Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Assignment 5 16109062 Rahul

    Uploaded by

    Rahul Fonsa
    10 views9 pages
    This document contains tabular data comparing the flexural modulus (E(flex)) and density of materials at different volume fractions of magnesium composites. The materials tested include polyethylene (PE), carbon fiber (Cf), silicon carbide (SiC), and aluminum (Al). The data shows that as the volume fraction of the additional material increases, both the flexural modulus and density of the magnesium composite generally increase. Magnesium composites with carbon fiber have the highest flexural modulus values and are best suited for applications requiring a stiff and light panel material.

    Original Description:

    Original Title

    Assignment_5_16109062_Rahul_

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    ODS, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document contains tabular data comparing the flexural modulus (E(flex)) and density of materials at different volume fractions of magnesium composites. The materials tested include polyethylene (PE), carbon fiber (Cf), silicon carbide (SiC), and aluminum (Al). The data shows that as the volume fraction of the additional material increases, both the flexural modulus and density of the magnesium composite generally increase. Magnesium composites with carbon fiber have the highest flexural modulus values and are best suited for applications requiring a stiff and light panel material.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as ODS, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    10 views9 pages

    Assignment 5 16109062 Rahul

    Uploaded by

    Rahul Fonsa
    This document contains tabular data comparing the flexural modulus (E(flex)) and density of materials at different volume fractions of magnesium composites. The materials tested include polyethylene (PE), carbon fiber (Cf), silicon carbide (SiC), and aluminum (Al). The data shows that as the volume fraction of the additional material increases, both the flexural modulus and density of the magnesium composite generally increase. Magnesium composites with carbon fiber have the highest flexural modulus values and are best suited for applications requiring a stiff and light panel material.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as ODS, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 9

    Ec Ef C1/C2 vol fraction f d/L E(flex) E(flex) E(flex) density

    0.255 46 3 0.003 0.05 2.493986 2.518814 2.71744 200


    4 0.005 1.529724 1.554503 1.752729 330
    12 0.01 0.805606 0.83026 1.027491 590
    0.02 0.442806 0.467211 0.662449 850
    0.03 0.321375 0.345531 0.538778 1110
    0.05 0.223384 0.247042 0.436303 1240
    0.1 0.147453 0.169866 0.349167 1370
    0.2 0.104314 0.124236 0.283614 1435
    0.3 0.085384 0.102816 0.242272 1461
    0.5 0.062199 0.07465 0.174262 1474
    0.7 0.044755 0.052226 0.111993 1487
    0.9 0.029232 0.031722 0.051644 1493.5
    1 0.021739 0.021739 0.021739 1496.1

    0.005543 50

    Gc 45
    0.10039
    40

    35

    30

    25

    20

    15

    10

    0
    0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
    density E(flex) E(flex) E(flex)
    203.9 0.400965 0.397012 0.367993
    206.5 0.653713 0.643293 0.570539
    213 1.241301 1.204442 0.973245
    226 2.258325 2.140361 1.509549
    239 3.111625 2.894094 1.856054
    265 4.476601 4.047903 2.291983
    330 6.781805 5.886995 2.863962
    460 9.586464 8.049194 3.525913
    590 11.71175 9.726081 4.127584
    850 16.07743 13.39577 5.738487
    1110 22.34389 19.14762 8.929151
    1370 34.20937 31.52382 19.3632
    1500 46 46 46

    Column L
    Column M
    Column N

    800 1000 1200 1400 1600


    E(Mg) Rho(Mg) E(PE) Rho(PE) E(Cf) Rho(Cf) E(SiC) Rho(SiC) E(Al) Rho(Al)

    44 1800 105 950 230 1820 400 3200 330 3700

    1000

    modulus

    100

    10
    500
    10
    500

    If we draw lines of slope 3 based on th


    vol fraction Mg with PE Mg with PE density Mg with PE Mg with Cf Mg with Cf density Mg with Cf
    44 44 1800 44 44 1800
    0.1 50.1 46.7138524 1715 92.6 48.442044 1802
    0.2 56.2 49.7844828 1630 141.2 53.881701 1804
    0.3 62.3 53.2871972 1545 189.8 60.697553 1806
    0.4 68.4 57.3200993 1460 238.4 69.487485 1808
    0.5 74.5 62.0134228 1375 287 81.254355 1810
    0.6 80.6 67.5438596 1290 335.6 97.818792 1812
    0.7 86.7 74.1573034 1205 384.2 122.86617 1814
    0.8 92.8 82.2064057 1120 432.8 165.15581 1816
    0.9 98.9 92.2155689 1035 481.4 251.83585 1818
    1 105 105 950 530 530 1820

    Mg with PE
    Mg with PE
    Mg with Cf
    Mg with Cf
    Mg with SiC
    Mg with SiC
    Mg with Al
    Mg with Al

    Density
    5000
    5000

    of slope 3 based on the material index for light and stiff panel we will find that magnesium with
    Mg with SiC Mg with SiC density Mg with SiC Mg with Al Mg with Al density Mg with Al
    44 44 1800 44 44 1800
    79.6 48.298573 1940 72.6 48.175182 1990
    115.2 53.5279805 2080 101.2 53.225806 2180
    150.8 60.0272851 2220 129.8 59.459459 2370
    186.4 68.3229814 2360 158.4 67.346939 2560
    222 79.2792793 2500 187 77.647059 2750
    257.6 94.4206009 2640 215.6 91.666667 2940
    293.2 116.710875 2780 244.2 111.86441 3130
    328.8 152.777778 2920 272.8 143.47826 3320
    364.4 221.105528 3060 301.4 200 3510
    400 400 3200 330 330 3700

    Mg with PE
    Mg with PE
    Mg with Cf
    Mg with Cf
    Mg with SiC
    Mg with SiC
    Mg with Al
    Mg with Al

    5000
    5000

    d that magnesium with carbon fibre will lies on the upper right of the graph which is best suitab
    ich is best suitable material for this application

    You might also like