Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Consideration means the exchange price in ordinary sense. Consideration even may be
termed as burden discharged. In other words, it can be explained as ‘suffering’ in the sense of
loosing something, may be that is one’s energy, service, money or anything.
The concept ‘Consideration’ has been defined in section 2(d) of The Contract
Act, 1872. It says: When, At the desire of the promisor, the promisee or any other person
has done or abstained from doing, or does or abstains from doing, or promises to do or to
abstain from doing something, such act or abstinence or promise is called a consideration for
the promise.
Elements of consideration:
It is an act or abstinence. That means it may be positive or negative
It is done at the desire of the promisor. So, if it is done at the desire of any third person
that will not be a consideration. Conversely, if anything is done at the desire of the
promisor, then that will be a good consideration irrespective of the nature of the thing
done, even that may be legal or illegal, adequate or inadequate.
It may be three forms, i.e. has been done or is being done or is promised to be done at
future time
The contract must include a bargain for the terms of the exchange. This means there must
be something that is worth bargaining over to both the parties
There must be a mutual exchange between the parties. In simple terms, all parties
involved must benefit from the contract.
The exchange in the contract must be something of value.
An intent by both parties to enter into the agreement
One party must make an offer
The other party must accept an offer
Consideration may move from the promisee or any other person : From the
definition of consideration we cleared that there is no such requirement that consideration
1
1(1875) LR 10 Exch 153
2 In Thomas V. Thomas (1842) 2 QB 851
3 10th edn, sweet & Maxwell, 1999, at P. 64.
4 3rd edn, law of contract, Dr Muhammad Ekramul Haque, 2016
5 https://legaldictionary.net/consideration/
must move from promisee rather it may be furnished by the promisee or any other person and
as such an only material thing to be considered is that whether there is any consideration or
not. So a promise is enforceable if there exists any consideration and it is immaterial that by
the whom the consideration has been furnished.
According the reputed case Chinaya Vs. Ramaya2: An old lady, by deed of gift, made
over certain landed property to the defendant, her daughter. By the terms of the deed, which
was registered, it was stipulated that an annuity of Rs. 653 should be paid every year to the
plaintiff, who was the sister of the old women. The defendant of the same day executed in
plaintiff’s favour an Iqranama (agreement) promising to give to the stipulation. The annuity
was, however, not paid and the plaintiff sued to recover it.
Kinds of consideration:
Executory consideration
Executed consideration
Past consideration
Past consideration is one, which took place and is complete before the promise is made. If the
service is rendered in the past at the request or desire of the promisor the subsequent promise
is regarded as an admission that the past consideration was not gratuitous and which is
evidence of the amount of the reasonable remuneration on the faith of which the services
were rendered.2
The rule has sprung that if there is no consideration there is no contract according to the
section 25
2
6 https://accountlearning.com/consideration-contract-meaning-need-kinds/
An Agreement made without consideration is void
while laying down the first exception says that- it is expressed in writing and registered under
the law for the time being in force for the registration of documents and is made on account
of natural love and affection between parties standing in a near relation to each other.
I. The parties stand in near relation to each other and the agreement is made out of
natural love and relation. Example: Mother and son, husband and wife
II. It is written
III. It is registered
It is a promise to compensate, wholly or in part, a person who has already voluntarily done
something for the promisor, or something which the promisor was legally compellable to do.
I. To compensate wholly or in part person who has already voluntarily done something
for the promisor for instance, A find the dog of B and then B promises to give A TK.
1000, the promise made is enforceable by law without consideration.
II. To compensate wholly or in part a person who has already voluntarily done
something for the promisor which he was legally compellable to do. Suppose, if A
pays the gas bill of B and then B’s subsequent promise to compensate A is
enforceable without any consideration
3. the promise regarding the payment of time barred debt which is section
25(3) lays down that: it is a promise, made in writing and signed by the person to be
charged therewith, or by his agent generally or specially authorized in that behalf, to pay
wholly or in part a debt of which the creditor might have enforced payment but for the law
for the limitations of suits.
I. The promise must be about payment of time barred debt. So, if there is any claim
which is barred by the law of limitation for the time being in force, then the
subsequent promise made to pay the debt is enforceable without consideration if the
next condition is satisfied.
II. It should be written and signed.
An act
A promise to perform or not to perform an act
Property
Money
For example, if you offer to sell off your house to someone at $50,000, and in exchange, he
offers services to you worth this amount, then the consideration is deemed to be adequate.
In addition to a consideration, an agreement to the terms of a contract, a valid offer, and
acceptance are necessary for a contract to be enforced by any court. Consideration, in
essence, ensures the enforcement of promises made by one party to another, in a manner that
is acceptable by the law. In a written contract, even though inadequate consideration is not
void, it can make a contract unenforceable.
Some contracts do not necessarily require considerations in order to be enforceable. If the
court determines that one party deceived the other and they got into a contract that does not
meet the minimum requirements for a consideration, the court may allow for a substitute of
consideration, considering that the deceived party greatly relied on the promises made by the
other party. Even though both adequate and sufficient considerations involve a given value
for a contract to be legal, there is a slim difference between them. Whereas adequate
consideration demands that a contract constitutes a fair value, sufficient consideration only
considers the value as a factor — irrespective of whether it is fair or not. The law further
provides that as long as a consideration for a contract has some value, it is legal, even though
the value may not be fair. In this case, the consideration is sufficient but not adequate.
37
Mulla, the Indian Contract Act, 10th ed. P. 11.
8 39 DLR 243
9 Ibid
10https://www.upcounsel.com/adequacy-of-consideration-means