Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Turbocharging of Ic Engines To Increase Overall Efficiency and Recover Waste Heat
Turbocharging of Ic Engines To Increase Overall Efficiency and Recover Waste Heat
INTRODUCTION:
From the past few decades there has been a trend of making the most ideal
engine by the engineers. Every time there is a difficulty to obtain highest
efficiency without compromising performance. However, it is important to
understand the parameters on which the engine’s efficiency is dependent
and how these parameters can be altered to achieve maximum efficiency.
Parameters like thermodynamic processes, internal friction, expansion ratio,
air-fuel-ratio, load, tribological boundaries and various losses accounts for
engine performance [1]. Majority of the energy lost is in the form of heat.
Continuous attempts are being made by engineers to overcome losses and
recover energy to get the maximum output. Technically, Efficiency of an
engine can be deduced as the ratio of power obtained after the combustion
of fuel to the amount of fuel required to produce the output.
--------------- 1 b------------------------
Previous studies have shown that using Hybrid Turbochargers can be
In this paper, the effects of turbo charging on various engine parameters are
simulated and results are analyzed to advocate the use of turbocharger as a
method to increase overall efficiency of engine. It’s not clear how this fills the
gap you just mentioned in Move 2. Make the connection clear. It is found
that the integration of various components of drive train affects the
performance parameters, so an attempt will be made to predict the
variations in performance by using different combinations of compressor,
gearbox, and pumps in relation to the turbine [4] [11]. Why are there
citations in Move 3? Move 3 should be focused on the experiment/test/study
that you “did.” Furthermore, the use of organic rankine cycle will be
validated as it also improves engine efficiency and enhances CHP [7] [12].
Same here. If you are going to use some of the methods from previous
research, then that is what you should be talking about in the literature
review (move 1b). To achieve maximum efficiency various waste heat
recovery methods will be tested in conjunction with the use of turbochargers.
To aid the experimentation results and statistical data, software’s like CFD to
simulate working of fluids, MATLAB to compute the raw data, ANSYS to
perform thermal analysis will be used currently, the IC engine runs on 40%
efficiency and in this paper we will try to use above mentioned methods to
increase the efficiency by 5% to 10%. Thus, the ultimate aim of this paper is
to discuss the optimum solutions to achieve maximum engine efficiency
under dynamic working conditions. You’ve got way too much going on for
Move 3. Just keep it simple. State what your paper is presenting (your
methods and hypothesis) is just a couple sentences.
So generally, you need to clean up your literature review (1b) so that you’re
actually discussing the previous literature and not how stuff works. This is
not a teaching article. You are trying to argue that your research is relevant
but showing what others have done and how your study fills a certain gap in
that research.
REFERENCES:
Nothing in a reference list should be ALL CAPS.
[1]p. Bera, "development of engine efficiency characteristic in dynamic
working states", energies, vol. 12, no. 15, p. 2906, 2019. Available:
10.3390/en12152906
[2]a. Kasztelan, y. Yao, d. Marchant and y. Wang, "a review of novel
turbocharger concepts for enhancements in energy efficiency", international
journal of thermal and environmental engineering, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 75-82,
2010. Available: 10.5383/ijtee.02.02.003
[9]very high fuel economy, heavy duty, constant speed, truck engine
optimized via unique energy recovery turbines and facilitated high efficiency
continuously variable drivetrain. Washington, d.c: united states. Dept. Of
energy, 2010
“The primary objective of a turbocharger is to use the waste gas from the
exhaust and produce more power without additional fuel. With the recent
advancement in the automobile industry the turbochargers have become
more diverse and provide us with a wide range of working conditions.
Previous [5] studies have shown that using Hybrid Turbochargers can be
effective in improving engine performance.”
“Turbocharger is a single axial turbine which is run by the exhaust gas
coming out of the combustion chamber [5]” The underlined idea is not
stated in the original source quote below. This is plagiarism.
[4]
[7]
“[…] producing electrical energy via generator and reusing heat energy for
cabin heating reduces the load on engine significantly [7].” None of the
quotes below say this.
“Furthermore, the use of organic rankine cycle will be validated as it also
improves engine efficiency […] [7] [12].”
“[…] This process of collecting exhaust gas and reusing it to produce extra
power through turbines by increasing volume of air inside the combustion
chamber […] [7]” I don’t see this information below in the quotes either.
This is a problem for all of the above examples. You’re adding ideas and
interpretations to your paraphrases, and you can’t do this. A paraphrase has
to match in meaning. After you cite the information, then you can
interpretation and add your own meaning to it, but you cannot combine
them because that’s plagiarism.
Your grade for the draft does not take these paraphrasing issues into
account, so just know that if you still have issues like this, your grade will
likely be lower.
“The conclusion is that the Rankine cycle presents the best heat recovery
potential and the largest application range.” Your paraphrase says
something different from this.
“The heat exchangers and the pump already exist and the ORC components
are considered to have similar weight. Economic model of the energy
integration technology: heat exchanger, evaporator, turbine, pump, and
condenser.”