You are on page 1of 7

Aquaculture Research, 2009, 40, 181^187 doi:10.1111/j.1365-2109.2008.02081.

Cage culture of the Pacific white shrimp Litopenaeus


vannamei (Boone, 1931) at different stocking densities
in a shallow eutrophic lake

Maria Lourdes A Cuvin-Aralar, Alma G Lazartigue & Emiliano V Aralar


Southeast Asian Fisheries Development Center, Aquaculture Department (SEAFDEC/AQD), Binangonan Freshwater Station,
Binangonan, Rizal, Philippines

Correspondence: M L A Cuvin-Aralar, Southeast Asian Fisheries Development Center, Aquaculture Department (SEAFDEC/AQD),
Binangonan Freshwater Station, Binangonan, 1940 Rizal, Philippines. E-mail: mlcaralar@aqd.seafdec.org.ph

Abstract few years ago, the National Fisheries Research and


Development Institute (NFRDI) imported high health
Postlarvae of Litopenaeus vannamei were acclimated
broodstock from accredited producers of Speci¢c
and stocked in lake-based cages at the following stock-
Pathogen Free/Speci¢c Pathogen Resistant (SPF/
ing densities: 10, 20, 30 and 40 shrimp m  2. Another
SPR) stocks for research purposes. It was only in Jan-
set of shrimp was stocked in concrete tanks as refer-
uary 2007 that the government ban on the culture of
ence samples at 30 shrimp m  2. Signi¢cant di¡er-
this species was lifted in this country, backed by data
ences were observed among stocking densities
obtained from the experimental trials and after a ser-
throughout the 95-day culture. The ¢nal weight at
ies of public consultations and hearings. The culture
harvest decreased with increasing stocking density:
of this introduced species is rapidly expanding in the
mean weights of 23.3, 15.8, 13.0, 10.9 and 14.6 g for the
Philippines, primarily because of its short culture
10, 20, 30, 40 shrimp m  2 and reference tanks were
period due to its fast growth.
observed respectively. There were no signi¢cant di¡er-
Shrimp is traditionally cultured in coastal or
ences in survival throughout the culture period, ran-
estuarine environments. Recently, with the success
ging between 69% and 77%. Daily growth rates
of China and the US in the inland culture of shrimp,
(range: 0.11^0.24 g day  1) and speci¢c growth rates
interest in their culture in low-salinity environments
(range: 3.54^4.34%) also di¡ered signi¢cantly among
has grown. The species of choice for inland shrimp
stocking densities, both increasing with decreasing
culture is the Paci¢c white shrimp L. vannamei be-
stocking density. The feed conversion ratio in the cages
cause it is a euryhaline species that can be found in
did not di¡er among the stocking densities, ranging
1^40 g L  1 salinity waters (Davis, Samochoa & Boyd
from 1.53 to 1.65. The relationship between stocking
2004). A number of studies have looked into the ionic
density and mean individual weight at harvest fol-
concentrations of low-salinity waters as a factor
lowed the equation y 5 81.06x  0.54 (R2 50.938) and
a¡ecting the growth and survival of L. vannamei in
that of stocking density and production (in g m  2) is
culture. Modi¢cations of the freshwater environment
y 5 58.01x  0.46 (R2 50.834).
to di¡erent ionic concentrations of potassium and
magnesium in 4 g L  1 salinity have been conducted
Keywords: Litopenaeus vannamei, freshwater, cage
(Davis, Saoud, McGraw & Rouse 2002; Davis, Boyd &
culture, stocking density, Laguna de Bay, Philippines
Rouse 2005). These studies have shown that the sur-
vival and growth of L. vannamei postlarvae are signif-
icantly improved by the supplementation of
potassium and magnesium in the culture waters.
Introduction
Successful acclimation of L. vannamei to 0.25 g L  1
The Paci¢c white shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei was has been carried out (Tomasso, Atwood & Browdy
recently introduced as a species in the Philippines. A 2004).

r 2008 The Authors


Journal Compilation r 2008 Blackwell Publishing Ltd 181
Culture of Litopenaeus vannamei in freshwater lake M L A Cuvin-Aralar et al. Aquaculture Research, 2009, 40, 181^187

This study was conducted to determine the Scarpa (2004). Davis et al. (2002) recommended that
growth and survival of L. vannamei cultured in PLs younger than PL15 should not be acclimated to
cages in a shallow eutrophic lake at low to moder- salinities lower than 4 g L  1. It was therefore
ate stocking densities and to determine the viabili- decided to prolong the acclimation to 5 days to
ty of this cage culture technology for adoption in further improve the survival of the PLs, by which
rural lakeshore ¢sh farming communities. Laguna time the PLs were already 16 days old at the end of
de Bay, where the experimental trials were con- acclimation. Final survival after acclimation was
ducted, is the largest inland water body in the Phi- 88% in our study. The freshwater-acclimated PLs
lippines and widely used for aquaculture of ¢n¢sh were nursed for 3 weeks in 5  5  1m hapa net
like milk¢sh Chanos chanos, Nile tilapia Oreochro- cages (1mm mesh size) inside concrete tanks sup-
mis niloticus, bighead carp Aristichthys nobilis and plied with deep well water. The stocking density for
African cat¢sh Clarias gariepinus. The lake has a the nursery phase was 80 PLs m  2, fed with a com-
mean depth of 2.8 m and is classi¢ed as freshwater. mercially formulated shrimp feed.
The lake periodically receives saltwater back£ow After 3 weeks in the nursery, the shrimp (average
from its single river outlet, the 24-km-long Pasig weight: 0.376  0.067 g) were stocked in ¢xed experi-
River, which connects to Manila Bay, which in turn mental hapa net cages (L  W  D: 2.5  1  1m;
opens into the South China Sea. Salt-water back- 1mm mesh size) tied to bamboo poles staked into
£ow occurs during years when there is limited the lake substrate within the vicinity of the station.
rainfall. The average water residence time in the The cages did not reach the substrate. The following
lake is 1 year. The study aims to determine the via- stocking densities each with four replicates were
bility of L. vannamei farming in cages as an alterna- used: 10, 20, 30 and 40 shrimp m  2. As a reference
tive to ¢n¢sh culture in the lake. Litopenaeus sample, another group of shrimp were stocked in four
vannamei has a higher market value that can con- replicate 2.5  1  1m outdoor concrete tanks ¢lled
siderably improve the livelihood of local ¢sh farm- with deep well water at a stocking density of
ers. Although there have been studies on the 30 shrimp m  2 (treatment designated as 30-T). Mon-
culture of L. vannamei in £oating cages, these were itoring to determine growth and survival was con-
conducted in an estuarine environment (Paquotte, ducted at 28, 64 and 95 days of culture (DOC). The
Chim, Marin, Lemos, Stern & Tosta 1998) and not in shrimp were fed with a commercially formulated
¢xed lake-based cages in inland waters. shrimp feed with the following proximate composi-
tion: 35.6% crude protein, 3.5 lipids, 5.9% ¢bre,
45.73% nitrogen-free extract and 11.21% ash. The
shrimp were initially fed at 10% body weight equiva-
Materials and methods
lent until 28 DOC, tapering o¡ to 7% until 64 DOC
The experimental trials were conducted at the lake- and 5% until termination of the experiment. Mortal-
based culture facilities of the Binangonan Fresh- ities from stress resulting in total sampling at 28 DOC
water Station (BFS) of SEAFDEC/AQD in Rizal, Phi- were observed. Sampling was modi¢ed to bulk
lippines. High health 11-day-old post-larvae PL of weighing 10 individuals per cage and counting the
L. vannamei in 26 g L  1 salinity were obtained from survivors on site to reduce stress-induced mortalities.
NFRDI’s National Inland Fisheries Technology Devel- Feed ration was adjusted based on sampling data. Ac-
opment Center (NIFTDC) in Pangasinan Province, cumulated detritus at the bottom and the sides of the
Philippines. This centre produces high health post- cages were removed during monthly sampling. No
larvae from SPF/SPR broodstock. The PLs were accli- aeration was provided throughout the experiment,
mated to freshwater using deep well water. as this is the typical practice in cage culture in this
Acclimation was carried out in stages by reducing lake. Water movement from wind was su⁄cient to
salinity to half that of the previous day by dilution of maintain the water quality inside the cages. Water
the saline rearing water with freshwater every morn- quality was monitored inside and outside the cages
ing until the ¢fth day when the water was changed at 09:00 h thrice a week for the duration of the ex-
fully to freshwater. Deep well water of BFS has a sali- periment. A portable Horiba Water Quality Checker
nity of 0.8 g L  1 and total hardness ranging from 80 Model U-10 (Horiba, Kyoto, Japan) was used to deter-
to 100 mg L  1. Survival of the freshwater-acclimated mine dissolved oxygen, temperature, pH, total dis-
shrimp can be improved by extending the acclima- solved solids and salinity. A Secchi disc was used to
tion time from 48 to 72 h according to McGraw and determine transparency.

r 2008 The Authors


182 Journal Compilation r 2008 Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Aquaculture Research, 40, 181^187
Aquaculture Research, 2009, 40, 181^187 Culture of Litopenaeus vannamei in freshwater lake M L A Cuvin-Aralar et al.

Table 1 Water quality parameters in the cage culture area and reference tanks

Cage Tank

Parameter Mean  SD Range Mean  SD Range

pH 8.85  0.85 7.20–10.90 7.30  0.3 6.70–7.8


Temperature ( 1C) 26.3  0.9 24.6–29.8 27.70  2.0 25.9–30.0
Dissolved oxygen (mg L  1) 7.5  0.8 5.9–8.8 5.60  1.2 4.8–9.0
Total dissolved solids (mg L  1) 685  247 550–1260 770  100 303–670
Salinity (g L  1) 0.36  0.08 0.30–0.41 0.79  0.10 0.60–1.00
Secchi disc depth (cm) 52.2  14.3 35.0–110 – –
Water depth (m) 1.0 – 1.0 –

The variables obtained during the experimental di¡erence between them was not signi¢cant. The
run were as follows: weight, daily growth rate shrimp reared as reference samples in tanks had a
(DGR), speci¢c growth rate (SGR), survival, produc- slightly higher mean weight of 14.6 g but did not dif-
tion and feed conversion ratio (FCR). Comparison of fer signi¢cantly from those reared in cages at 20 and
the various production parameters and survival 30 shrimp m  2.
among the di¡erent stocking densities in the cages Signi¢cant di¡erences among treatments were ob-
and the reference stocks in the concrete tanks at served in the DGRs as well as in the SGRs as shown in
30 shrimp m  2 were performed. Statistical analysis Table 2. The highest DGR was observed in shrimp in
of the data was conducted using ANOVA using the gen- the 10 shrimp m  2, with a ¢nal mean growth rate of
eral linear models procedure of the STATISTICAL ANALY- 0.24 g day  1. Progressively lower DGRs were ob-
SIS SYSTEM (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA) to compare served as the stocking densities increased, with the
production parameters for each sampling. Percen- shrimp stocked at 40 shrimp m  2 having only a
tage data were arcsin-transformed before statistical mean of 0.11g day  1. By 95 DOC, shrimp cultured in
analyses. Duncan’s multiple-range test was used to the reference tanks showed signi¢cantly lower DGR
distinguish among means, with signi¢cant di¡er- compared with those in lower stocking densities. No
ences at Po0.05. The ¢nal weight and production at signi¢cant di¡erences in DGR of the shrimp stocked
each stocking density for each replicate were plotted at 30 shrimp m  2 in cages (0.13 g day  1) and the re-
and ¢tted with a power trendline using the equation ference tanks (0.15 g day  1) were observed.
y 5 axb to calculate least-squares ¢t through points, SGRs decreased with increasing stocking density
where y is the weight (g) or production (g m  2), x is (Table 2). The trend followed that of the DGR. SGRs
the stocking density and a and b are constants. for all treatments in the cages were the highest in
the ¢rst month of culture, ranging from 8.67% to
10.09%. The highest SGR was in the 10 shrimp m  2,
with a mean of 4.34%, followed by those stocked at
Results
20 shrimp m  2 with 3.93%. Shrimp stocked in cages
Table 1 shows the water quality inside the lake-based at 30 shrimp m  2 showed rates similar to those in
cages during the course of the experiment. There the reference tanks of the same density. The lowest
were relatively high total dissolved solids ranging SGR was observed in the cages with 40 shrimp m  2,
from 550 to 1260 mg L  1. Salinity during the culture with 3.54%.
period ranged from 0.30 to 0.41g L. 1 The lake was Stocking density did not in£uence survival of
quite turbid, with a mean Secchi disc depth of shrimp throughout culture. Survival ranged from
52.2 cm. 69% to 77% after 95 DOC, with no signi¢cant di¡er-
Stocking density had a signi¢cant in£uence on the ences among treatments as well as with the reference
growth of L. vannamei (Table 2). At harvest, the stocks in the tanks (Table 2). Production of shrimp in
shrimp reared at 10 shrimp m  2 reached a mean cages was plotted with the mean weights at each
weight of 23.3 g, which was signi¢cantly higher than stocking density as shown in Fig. 1. Production was
in the other stocking densities. This was followed by expectedly the highest at the highest stocking
those reared at 20 shrimp m  2 with 15.8 g. The density with 300 g m  2. This was followed by 293,
shrimp reared at 30 and 40 shrimp m  2 had mean 243 and 162 g m  2 for 30, 20 and 10 shrimp m  2
weights of 13.0 and 10.9 g, respectively, although the respectively. The relationship between mean

r 2008 The Authors


Journal Compilation r 2008 Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Aquaculture Research, 40, 181^187 183
Culture of Litopenaeus vannamei in freshwater lake M L A Cuvin-Aralar et al. Aquaculture Research, 2009, 40, 181^187

Table 2 Growth rates, survival and feed conversion ratio (  standard deviation, n 5 4) at various sampling intervals of
Litopenaeus vannamei reared in lake-based experimental cages (10, 20, 30, 40 shrimp m  2) and reference tanks
(30 shrimp m  2(T))

Treatment Daily growth rate, Specific growth Feed conversion


Day (shrimp m  2) Weight (g) DGRw (g day  1) rate, SGR (%)z Survival (%) ratio, FCR

28 10 6.35  0.40a 0.21  0.01a 10.09  0.23a 92.0  8.6 0.16  0.03c
20 5.38  0.24b 0.18  0.01b 9.50  0.16b 91.5  3.0 0.19  0.01b,c
30 4.78  0.14c 0.16  0.01c 9.08  0.11b,c 94.7  2.7 0.20  0.01b,c
40 4.27  0.15d 0.14  0.01d 8.67  0.13c 97.0  0.8 0.23  0.01b
30 (T) 2.95  0.42e 0.09  0.01e 7.32  0.54d 96.4  2.8 0.35  0.06a
P-value 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.3299 0.0001
64 10 18.68  0.91a 0.29  0.01a 6.10  0.08a 86.0  5.2 0.91  0.07c
20 13.45  0.66b 0.20  0.01b 5.59  0.08b 87.0  3.8 1.06  0.12b,c
30 10.78  0.93c 0.16  0.01c 5.24  0.13c 86.7  4.2 1.24  0.11a,b
40 9.45  1.33cd 0.14  0.02c,d 5.03  0.21c,d 81.7  2.1 1.40  0.18a
30 (T) 8.80  1.09d 0.13  0.02d 4.92  0.20d 87.2  11.1 0.95  0.12c
P-value 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.5526 0.0002
95 10 23.25  1.35a 0.24  0.01a 4.34  0.06a 70.0  7.6 1.57  0.05a
20 15.75  0.54b 0.16  0.01b 3.93  0.04b 77.0  4.7 1.54  0.12a
30 13.00  1.41cd 0.13  0.01c,d 3.72  0.12c 75.3  4.1 1.53  0.13a
40 10.88  1.08d 0.11  0.01d 3.54  0.10d 69.0  7.7 1.65  0.16a
30 (T) 14.62  2.49bc 0.15  0.03b,c 3.84  0.20b,c 74.2  11.1 1.14  0.12b
P-value 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.5154 0.0002

Means of each parameter within each sampling day with di¡erent letter superscripts are signi¢cantly di¡erent at Po0.05 based on
ANOVA.
wDGR, SGR and FCR for each sampling day was computed from Day 0.
zSGR 5100  (lnWt11  lnWt)/(Tt  1  Tt), where lnW 5 natural logarithm of mean individual weight at time t11 or t and T 5 time
(days) t11 or t.

are reports of better (Bray, Lawrence & Leung-Trujillo


1994; Perez-Velasquez, Gonzales-Felix, Jaimes-Busta-
mante, Martinez-Cordova, Trujillo-Villalba & Davis
2007) and poorer (Pan, Zhang & Liu 2007;Yan,Wang
& Cao 2007) growth achieved by L. vannamei reared
in lower salinity waters compared with those reared
in higher salinities. Shrimp grown at 2 g L  1 showed
signi¢cantly better growth than those reared in 35
and 50 g L  1, although the experiment was only for
Figure 1 Weight and production of Penaeus vannamei 32 days (Perez-Velasquez et al. 2007). On the other
after 96 days of culture at di¡erent stocking densities. hand, studies by Ogle, Beaugez and Lotz (1992) re-
ported higher survival in Paci¢c white shrimp reared
in 16 than 2 g L  1 salinity. Similar results were ob-
individual weights achieved after 95 DOC and stock- tained by Yan et al. (2007) in their studies, which
ing density followed the equation y 5 81.06x  0.54 showed lower survival in L. vannamei cultured in
(R2 50.938), and the relationship between stocking 2 g L  1 salinity compared with those reared in sali-
density and production (in g m  2) is y 5 58.01x  0.46 nities of 11, 21 and 31g L  1. These discrepancies in
(R2 50.834). the performance of L. vannamei have been explained
by Perez-Velasquez et al. (2007) as an e¡ect of the age
of the shrimp at the start of rearing in low-salinity
waters: younger PLs perform poorly, both in terms of
Discussion
growth and survival, when cultured in low-salinity
There are mixed reports on the performance of L. waters, while older juveniles perform better in the
vannamei grown in low and higher salinity. There same rearing environment. PLs of L. vannamei accli-

r 2008 The Authors


184 Journal Compilation r 2008 Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Aquaculture Research, 40, 181^187
Aquaculture Research, 2009, 40, 181^187 Culture of Litopenaeus vannamei in freshwater lake M L A Cuvin-Aralar et al.

mated at PL15 or older showed better responses to course of his experiments, salinity in the ponds aver-
low salinities down to 1g L  1 (Davis et al. 2002). aged 0.7 g L  1 and shrimp reached mean individual
Growth in cages of L. vannamei in Laguna de Bay weights of 20.5, 14.4 and 17.1g after 134 DOC at 7, 13
was comparable to those obtained in other studies. and 30 shrimp m  2 stocking densities respectively.
Litopenaeus vannamei cultured at a salinity range of These values are comparable with those achieved by
9^13 g L  1 for 126 days at 35 shrimp m  2 with simi- our study after only 95 DOC. Salinity in Laguna de
lar initial weights as our studies reached a size range Bay, speci¢cally in the area where the shrimp were cul-
of 18^20 g with FCR of 1.1^1.4 and DGR of 0.14^ tured in cages, ranged from 0.30 to 0.41g L  1 and was
0.16 g day  1 (Amaya, Davis & Rouse 2007). The DGR slightly lower than those in the ponds used by Green
obtained in our studies were also comparable to (2008). The concentrations of ions such as potassium
those obtained by Zelaya, Rouse and Davis (2007), and magnesium in the rearing water, reported to be im-
who reported 0.13^0.15 g day  1 after 112 DOC at portant in low-salinity culture of L. vannamei, should
22 g L  1 salinity at a stocking density of also be determined before future attempts to culture in
35 shrimp m  2. The survival rates in our study could inland waters, similar to those conducted by Saoud,
have been higher because stress-induced mortalities Davis and Rouse (2003) for inland well waters.
from monthly sampling were observed during the The results obtained in this study show that L. vanna-
course of the experiment. Nevertheless, survival in mei can be acclimated and reared to a marketable size
the cage experiments was slightly higher at 69^77% (15^20 g) in cages in this lake and opens up the possibi-
compared with those reported by Zelaya et al. (2007), lity of culture at moderate stocking densities of this spe-
who reported 63^64% survival of L. vannamei at cies. The choice of stocking densities will depend on the
35 shrimp m  2 after 112 DOC in 22 g L  1. Martinez- target size of shrimp at harvest. Survival rates were not
Cordova and Pena-Messina (2005) also obtained much in£uenced by the stocking densities used. Production
lower survival after 10 weeks of culture in fertilized in cages obtained from this study at 293^300 g m  2
ponds with only 35% for L. vannamei cultured at for those stocked at 30^40 shrimp m  2 for 95 DOC
30 shrimp m  2. was slightly lower than those obtained in ponds re-
The lower FCR (1.14) for the shrimp in the refer- ported in other studies using amended freshwater en-
ence tanks in our experiment could be due to the vironments at 345^496 g m  2 at stocking densities of
more e⁄cient utilization of feed probably due to com- 30^39 shrimp m  2 after 125 DOC (Green 2008). In
plete access to feeds dispensed compared with possi- higher salinity ponds of 15^24.5 ppt stocked at
ble losses of feed through the bottom of the net cages. 35 shrimp m  2, production ranged from 352 to
The relatively good growth and survival of the 374 g m  2 after a culture period of 112 days (Garza de
shrimp used in our experiment despite the extremely Yta et al. 2004). However, mean production from the re-
low salinity may be due to the longer nursery phase ference tanks with 30 shrimp m  2 was 384 g m  2
before stocking the juvenile shrimp in the cages. Garza after 95 DOC, which was compared with the results
deYta, Rouse and Davis (2004) suggest that nurseries from the other studies conducted in pond systems by
improve survival during grow-out and increase size Green (2008) and Garza de Yta et al. (2004). Our re-
uniformity at harvest. Zelaya et al. (2007) reported sults show that the culture of the Paci¢c white
that shrimp stocked directly to grow-out ponds had shrimp at moderate stocking densities is a viable
lower weights compared with those that were ¢rst alternative for Laguna de Bay. No additional aeration
nursed, although the di¡erences were not statistically was needed during the culture period at the densities
signi¢cant. used in this study. The relatively short culture period
The salinity during the duration of the experi- of L. vannamei means fast turnover rates and the pos-
ments was lower compared with those used in pre- sibility of three to four croppings per year.
vious studies using low-salinity waters. Roy, Davis, Because modi¢cation of the rearing water by addi-
Saoud and Henry (2007a) used 4 g L  1 with L. van- tion of ions such as potassium and magnesium is
namei until the juvenile stage with the addition of highly impractical and not recommended for lake-
some ions, and showed that addition of K1 increased based culture, dietary supplementation of these im-
growth and addition of Mg1 signi¢cantly improved portant ions may further improve the performance
survival but did not a¡ect growth. Green (2008) of L. vannamei for culture in lake-based cages. Diet-
reported stocking strategies for grow-out of L. vannamei ary modi¢cations may also help in improving the
in ponds ¢lled with freshwater amended with major production of L. vannamei in freshwater by providing
ions such as potassium and magnesium. During the mineral supplementation to feeds used for freshwater

r 2008 The Authors


Journal Compilation r 2008 Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Aquaculture Research, 40, 181^187 185
Culture of Litopenaeus vannamei in freshwater lake M L A Cuvin-Aralar et al. Aquaculture Research, 2009, 40, 181^187

or low-salinity culture of these shrimp. There are stu- Davis D.A., Saoud I.P., McGraw W.J. & Rouse D.B. (2002)
dies that show that supplementation of minerals es- Considerations for Litopenaeus vannamei reared in inland
sential for osmoregulatory process enhances the low salinity waters. In: Avances en Nutricion Acuicola VI.
growth and survival of this shrimp (Roy, Davis, Memorias delVI Simposium Internacional de Nutricion Acuico-
Saoud & Henry 2007b). la.3 al 6 Septiembre del 2002 (ed. by L.E. Cruz-Suarez, D.
Ricque-Marie, M. Tapia-Salazar, M.G. Gaxiola-Cortes
Environmental and health management issues on
& N. Simoes), pp. 73–90. Southern Regional
the culture of L. vannamei in freshwater and low-salinity
Aquaculture Center, Auburn, Alabama.
waters should also be considered. There are reports of Davis D.A., Samochoa T.M. & Boyd C.E. (2004) Acclimating Pa-
the presence of introduced L. vannamei in rivers and es- ci¢c White Shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei, to Inland, Low-
tuaries inThailand, probably due to escapees from near- Salinity Waters. US Department of Agriculture. SRAC
by farms because there is as yet no evidence to conclude Publication No. 2601, 8pp. http://www.ag.auburn.edu/
that these shrimp have established themselves in the davisda/publications/publication__¢les/ca19__sina__vi.pdf
wild (Senanan, Tangkrock-olan, Panutrakul, Barnette, Davis D.A., Boyd C.E. & Rouse D.B. (2005) E¡ects of potas-
Wongwiwatanawute, Niphonkit & Anderson, 2007). sium, magnesium and age on growth and survival of Li-
Moreover, this study involved estuarine and riverine topenaeus vannamei post larvae reared in inland low
salinity well waters in West Alabama. Journal of theWorld
environments with a mean salinity of 23.17 g L  1.
Aquaculture Society 36, 416^419.
Thus far, there are no reports of escapees of L. vanna-
Garza DeYta A., Rouse D.B. & Davis D.A. (2004) In£uence of
mei populations that have established in fresh or very
nursery period on the growth and survival of Litopenaeus
low-salinity waters. However, a thorough assessment vannamei under pond production conditions. Journal of
of the possible ecological impact of the culture of L. van- the World Aquaculture Society 35, 357^367.
namei in cages in inland waters should be conducted Green B. (2008) Stocking strategies for production of Litope-
before the results of our experimental trial can be con- naeus vannamei (Boone) in amended freshwater in inland
ducted on a commercial scale. ponds. Aquaculture Research 39, 10^17.
Questions on the susceptibility of L. vannamei Martinez-Cordova L.R. & Pena-Messina E. (2005) Biotic
reared in fresh and low-salinity waters to diseases communities and feeding habits of Litopenaeus vannamei
still need to be investigated. Pan, Jiang & Miao (Boone 1931) and Litopenaeus stylirostris (Stimpson 1974)
(2005) tested L. vannamei at salinities between 5 and in monoculture and polyculture semi-intensive ponds.
Aquaculture Research 36,1075^1084.
30 g L  1. The results show that phenoloxidase, bac-
McGraw W.J. & Scarpa J. (2004) Mortality of freshwater-ac-
teriolytic and antibacterial activities returned to con-
climated Litopenaeus vannamei associated with acclima-
trol values within 6 h of exposure to di¡erent tion rate, habituation period, and ionic challenge.
salinities, which is covered by the time frame for the Aquaculture 236, 285^296.
acclimation of the shrimp to freshwater. The use of Ogle J.T., Beaugez K. & Lotz J.M. (1992) E¡ects of salinity on
high health stocks of L. vannamei from accredited the growth and survival of Penaeus vannamei. Gulf Re-
sources will minimize the introduction into the cul- search Reports 8, 415^421.
ture environment of devastating diseases. Pan L.-Q., Jiang L.-X. & Miao J.-J. (2005) E¡ects of salinity and
pH on immune parameters of white shrimp Litopenaeus
vannamei. Journal of Shell¢sh Research 24,1223^1227.
Pan L.-Q., Zhang L.-J. & Liu H.-Y. (2007) E¡ects of salinity
Acknowledgment
and pH on ion-transport enzume activities, survival and
The authors thank Mr Federico Reyes for the assis- growth of Litopenaeus vannamei postlarvae. Aquaculture
tance in the sampling of the shrimp in cages. 273,711^720.
Paquotte P., Chim L., Marin J.-L.M., Lemos E., Stern M. & Tos-
ta G. (1998) Intensive culture of shrimp Penaeus vannamei
in £oating cages: zootechnical, economic and environ-
References
mental aspects. Aquaculture 164, 151^166.
Amaya E.A., Davis D.A. & Rouse D.B. (2007) Replacement of Perez-Velasquez M., Gonzales-Felix M.L., Jaimes-Busta-
¢sh meal in practical diets for Paci¢c white shrimp (Lito- mante F., Martinez-Cordova L.R., Trujillo-Villalba D.A. &
penaeus vannamei) reared under pond conditions. Aqua- Davis D.A. (2007) Investigation of the e¡ects of salinity
culture 262, 393^401. and dietary protein level on growth and survival of Paci-
Bray W.A., Lawrence A.L. & Leung-Trujillo J.R. (1994) The ¢c white shrimp, Litopenaeus vannamei. Journal of the
e¡ect of salinity on growth and survival of Penaeus vanna- World Aquaculture Society 38, 475^485.
mei, with observations on the interaction of IHHN virus Roy L.A., Davis D.A., Saoud I.P. & Henry R.P. (2007a) E¡ects
and salinity. Aquaculture 122, 133^146. of varying levels of aqueous potassium and magnesium

r 2008 The Authors


186 Journal Compilation r 2008 Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Aquaculture Research, 40, 181^187
Aquaculture Research, 2009, 40, 181^187 Culture of Litopenaeus vannamei in freshwater lake M L A Cuvin-Aralar et al.

on survival, growth, and respiration of the Paci¢c white (Litopenaeus vannamei, Boone, 1931) in the wild in
shrimp, Litopenaeus vannamei, reared in low salinity Thailand. Journal of Shell¢sh Research 26, 1187^1192.
waters. Aquaculture 262, 461^469. Tomasso J., Atwood H. & Browdy C. (2004) Physiolo-
Roy L.A., Davis D.A., Saoud I.P. & Henry R.P. (2007b) gical challenges of culturing Litopenaeus vannamei in
Supplementation of potassium, magnesium and sodium water containing low concentrations of dissolved solids.
chloride in practical diets for the Paci¢c white shrimp, US Marine Shrimp Farming Program Industry Briefs 10,
Litopenaeus vannamei, reared in low salinity waters. 1^7.
Aquaculture Nutrition 13, 104^113. Yan B.,Wang X. & Cao M. (2007) E¡ects of salinityand tempera-
Saoud I.P., Davis D.A. & Rouse D.B. (2003) Suitability of in- ture on survival, growth and energy budget of juvenile Lito-
land well waters for Litopenaeus vannamei culture. Aqua- penaeus vannamei. Journal of Shell¢sh Research 26,141^146.
culture 217, 373^383. Zelaya O., Rouse D.B. & Davis D.A. (2007) Growout of Paci¢c
Senanan W., Tankrock-olan N., Panutrakul S., Barnette P., white shrimp, Litopenaeus vannamei, stocked into produc-
Wongwiwatanawute C., Niphonkit N. & Anderson D.J. tion ponds at three di¡erent ages. Journal of the World
(2007) The presence of Paci¢c whiteleg shrimp Aquaculture Society 38, 92^101.

r 2008 The Authors


Journal Compilation r 2008 Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Aquaculture Research, 40, 181^187 187

You might also like