Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Buildings are designed per building code regulations, aptly termed Prescriptive Based
Design. It is a methodology based upon meeting all of the specific requirements of the code.
In prescriptive based design, the normal engineering analysis practice is to assume
linear-elastic behavior for structural members, which fails to reliably account for
redistribution of forces due to member nonlinear behavior and dissipation of energy due to
material yielding. Because of this, considerable damage has been observed and life safety
goals was not achieved from major earthquakes in recent decades in residential and
commercial buildings. Safety is understood as the structures ability to deform in the inelastic
range but no collapsed is allowed.
During high seismic excitation, the building generally responds well beyond its elastic and
linear capacity. There are two inelastic nonlinear options available for assessing the
performance of a structure subjected to earthquake load; namely Pushover Analysis and
Inelastic Nonlinear Time History Analysis. These two methods of analyses are used in
Performance Based Design. It is a methodology using advanced engineering tools and methods
to provide solutions to complex life safety problems in order to achieved life safety goals.
The purpose of this presentation is to explain the procedure in performing Inelastic Nonlinear
Analysis using the professional software XTRACT v3.0.8 and PERFORM-3D v4.0.3, to
evaluate the performance of multi-storey buildings (designed by traditional linear static and
linear dynamic load procedures) when subjected to earthquake ground motion.
PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT OF RC MRF BUILDING BENNY AIT
Civil/Structural Engineer
- Thailand ACECOMS
Performance Objectives
Overview
Vision 2000 Committee of SEAOC (1995) describes the concept of
performance based seismic engineering that the building needs to satisfy
certain performance criteria in order to achieve specified performance
objectives for different performance levels or damage states.
Performance Objectives
An expression of the desired performance levels for the building for
each earthquake design level. The qualitative performance statements
is to resist:
minor levels of earthquake shaking (magnitude 4 to 4.9) without damage.
moderate levels of earthquake shaking (magnitude 5 to 5.9) without
structural damage.
major levels of earthquake shaking (magnitude 6 to 6.9) with structural and
nonstructural damage but protect life safety.
the most severe levels of earthquake shaking (magnitude 7 to 7.9) ever
anticipated without collapse.
PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT OF RC MRF BUILDING BENNY AIT
Civil/Structural Engineer
- Thailand ACECOMS
Performance Levels
An expression of the maximum desired extends of damage to a building
which may be considered satisfactory for a given earthquake ground
motion. The standard performance levels are:
Collapse
Global
Life Safety
capacity
curve
Building Displacement Δ (earthquake intensity)
PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT OF RC MRF BUILDING BENNY AIT
Civil/Structural Engineer
- Thailand ACECOMS
Performance Based Design
Perform
Preliminary
Design
Assess
Performance
Capability
Revise
Design
Does
No Performance Yes
Done
Meet
Objectives?
Collapse
Lateral shear
Lateral deformation
Increasing earthquake demand
Collapse Prevention
Performance Level
Collapse
Note that for nonductile
Damage Limited
structure, there may be
control safety relatively little margin in the
Elastic response that respectively
Range defines the three performance
levels.
Lateral deformation
Increasing earthquake demand
Mean
Probability of Return FEMA
Exceedance Period 273 Design Earthquake
(Years)
50% in 50 years 72 O Minor earthquake
20% in 50 years 225 IO Moderate earthquake
10% in 50 years 475 LS Design basis earthquake (DBE)
2% in 50 years 2,475 CP Maximum Considered Earthquake or
Maximum Capable Earthquake (MCE)
DBE – the major earthquake defined by various parameters such as PGA, response spectra, etc. for which
the structure will be, or was, designed.
MCE – the greatest or severe earthquake that can reasonably be expected to be generated by a specific
source on the basis of seismological and geological evidence.
PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT OF RC MRF BUILDING BENNY AIT
Civil/Structural Engineer
- Thailand ACECOMS
Building Performance Levels
Building Performance Levels are obtained by combining Structural and
Nonstructural Performance Levels.
Performance Structural Target Damage and Nonstructural Target
Level Performance Damage and
Performance
Operational (O) Very light damage. No permanent Negligible damage.
drift. Substantially original Power and other utilities are
strength and stiffness. available.
Immediate Light damage. No permanent Equipment and contents
Occupancy (IO) drift. Substantially original secure but may not operate
strength and stiffness. Minor due to mechanical/utility
cracking. failure.
Elevators can be restarted.
Fire protection operable.
PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT OF RC MRF BUILDING BENNY AIT
Civil/Structural Engineer
- Thailand ACECOMS
Building Performance Levels (continued)
Performance Structural Target Damage and Nonstructural Target
Level Performance Damage and
Performance
Life Safety (LS) Moderate damage. Some Falling hazard mitigated but
permanent drift. Residual strength extensive systems damage.
and stiffness in all stories. Gravity
elements function. Building may
be beyond economical repair.
Collapse Prevention Severe damage. Large permanent Equipment and contents
(CP) drifts. Little residual strength or secure but may not operate
stiffness. Gravity elements due to mechanical/utility
function. Some exits blocked. failure.
Building near collapse.
Start
CAPACITY
REDESIGN DEMAND
PERFORMANCE
No
OK?
Yes
End
Methods of Analysis
There is a hierarchy of four levels of structural analysis for the evaluation
of existing buildings (FEMA). These four methods of analysis are also
used to determine the seismic response of new structures:
Linear Static Procedure (LSP)
– Suitable only for regular buildings, which respond primarily within the
elastic range.
– The LSP is the equivalent static load procedure, as specified in UBC.
– Designing for an elastic code base shear and elastic drift limit will result in
structures with vastly different damage potential and collapse probability.
Linear Dynamic Procedure (LDP)
– Able to model irregular buildings but is also suitable for regular building
which respond primarily within the elastic range.
– The LDP is the response spectrum method of analysis, as specified in UBC.
– Still the same problems as in LSP, except accounts for higher mode effects.
Three points labeled IO, LS and CP are used to define the acceptance criteria for the hinge.
IO = Immediate Occupancy LS = Life Safety CP = Collapse Prevention
Performance point: No
OK?
Represents the
building’s ultimate Yes
deformation under the End
design earthquake
PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT OF RC MRF BUILDING BENNY AIT
Civil/Structural Engineer
- Thailand ACECOMS
Evaluation of Performance
According to performance point, engineers check the responses of the
building using certain acceptability criteria. The responses can be checked
on two levels. First, there are global limits on building responses for each
performance objective, such as lateral load stability and drift limits.
Secondly, the engineer checks local element or component responses against
acceptability limits, such as element strength and sectional inelastic rotation
limits. The limits on inelastic rotation are recommended based on
observations from tests and experience from past earthquakes (ATC-40,
1996).
A
PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT OF RC MRF BUILDING BENNY AIT
Civil/Structural Engineer
- Thailand ACECOMS
Note:
A
Simple scaling, scale the time
history so that its spectrum is at the
Initial Selection of Accelerograms approximate level of the design
response spectrum in the period
Recorded Time Histories range of significance to structural
or response. Because the spectrum of
Simulated-Recorded Time Histories recorded time history has peaks and
valleys, it is likely that this scaling will
result in a spectrum that exceeds the
Modification of Time Histories for smooth design spectrum at some
periods and is lower than the design
Compatibility with Design Response
spectrum at other periods. Therefore,
Spectrum additional time histories will probably
need to be selected and scaled so
Amplitude Scaling (Simple Scaling) that the spectra of the set of time
or histories provide an aggregate match
Frequency Scaling (Spectrum Matching) or fit to the design spectrum over the
period range of interest.
• Frequency scaling (or spectral mathcing) of earthquake records modifies the energy
content of the record at various frequencies so as to change the shape of the response
spectrum produced by the record. The procedure is iterative. This is where the use of
computer software like EZ-FRISK v7.32 is essential. For the detailed discussion on
frequency scaling, refer to Appendix C of Time History Dynamic Analysis of
Concrete Hydraulic Structures, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers manual EM 1110-2-
6051.
Internal
6 @ 3.0m
W-E beams: 45cm x 55cm
Top End Rebar: 4 – #8
Bottom End Rebar: 3 – #8
Top Midspan Rebar: 2 – #8
Bottom Midspan Rebar: 3 – #8
6.0m
Ties: #3 @0.10m
N-S beams: 45cm x 60cm
3.75m
Top End Rebar: 4 – #8
Bottom End Rebar: 3 – #8
Top Midspan Rebar: 2 – #8
Bottom Midspan Rebar: 3 – #8 6.0m 5.0m 6.0m
Ties: #3 @0.10m
Slabs: 135mm
The following XTRACT screen shots outlines the basic flow of the program
from creating a new project to creating cross sections to viewing analysis
data. This example will present each of the following steps in detail:
• Create a new project by clicking the 'New' icon on the main toolbar.
• Within the new project creation wizard, select begin from Template or
User Defined.
• Enter section data, material models, specify mesh size, and create cross
section.
• Add analyses to the created section.
• Analyze.
• View output results in the 'Interactive Output' dialog.
• Add a graph to compare analysis results from the different cross sections.
• View or print 'Analysis Reports'.
PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT OF RC MRF BUILDING BENNY AIT
Civil/Structural Engineer
- Thailand ACECOMS
70x70 RC Column
1. Create a new project by clicking the 'New' icon on the main toolbar.
Open a
New Project
Click to
Continue
Select User
Defined
Click to
Begin
Click to
Close
Apply
View Stress Material
Strain Plot for Model
given
Parameters
View Stress
Strain Plot for Apply
given Material
Parameters Model
View Stress
Strain Plot for Apply
given Material
Parameters Model
Discretize/
Overlay
Click to Click to
Import Discretize
Click to
Accept
Select PM
Interaction
Controlled by concrete
Controlled by steel
The change of the surface from being controlled by the concrete in compression to
being controlled by the steel in tension is so called balanced point.
PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT OF RC MRF BUILDING BENNY AIT
Civil/Structural Engineer
- Thailand ACECOMS
6. Add Moment Curvature analysis to the created section. A series of five
moment curvature analysis is typically performed with differing axial
forces.
Select
Moment
Curvature
Click to Click to
Accept Accept
Controlled by concrete
Controlled by steel
The following are the Analysis Reports for PM1, MC1, MC2, MC3, MC4,
and MC5.
Click to
Add New Click to
Section Add
Section
Select From
Template
Apply Material
Model
Click to
Add
Select Moment
Curvature
Click to Click to
Accept Accept
Note:
The dark blue represents
compression in the concrete,
the white is crushing of the
concrete, the yellow steel bars
represents the yield plateau,
the green bars represents
strain hardening, and fuchsia
and grey concrete represent
zero tensile strain
The following are the Analysis Reports for MC1, MC2, MC3, and MC4.
PERFORM-3D
Inelastic Basic F-D
Relationship
Click to Click to
Add New Add
Section Section
Select As a
copy of
Click to Select
Movement
Selected
Point
Click to Select
Movement
Click to
Enter new Y Discretize
coordinate
Click Draw
Bars
Click Select
Existing
Section Bars
Selected
Bars
Click to
Accept
Select Moment
Curvature
Click to Click to
Accept Accept
Note:
The dark blue represents
compression in the concrete,
the white is crushing of the
concrete, the yellow steel bars
represents the yield plateau,
the green bars represents
strain hardening, and fuchsia
and grey concrete represent
zero tensile strain
The following are the Analysis Reports for MC1, MC2, MC3, and MC4.
PERFORM-3D
Inelastic Basic F-D
Relationship
PERFORM-3D offers a powerful 3D nonlinear static pushover analysis and dynamic analysis
options which tracks hinge formation and helps identify the failure mode of the structure that
can be performed either on existing or new construction.
(e) 2D Frame
Various Ways
Fig. 1 Various Waysto Model a Real Structure
to Model a Real Struture
6 @ 3.0m
W-E beams: 45cm x 55cm
Top End Rebar: 4 – #8
Bottom End Rebar: 3 – #8
Top Midspan Rebar: 2 – #8
Bottom Midspan Rebar: 3 – #8
6.0m
Ties: #3 @0.10m
N-S beams: 45cm x 60cm
3.75m
Top End Rebar: 4 – #8
Bottom End Rebar: 3 – #8
Top Midspan Rebar: 2 – #8
Bottom Midspan Rebar: 3 – #8 6.0m 5.0m 6.0m
Ties: #3 @0.10m
Slabs: 135mm
Column Deformation Elastic Rotation < 0.01 radians Rotation < 0.02 radians
(FEMA 273 p. 6-20)
Beam Deformation Elastic Rotation < 0.02 radians Rotation < 0.025 radians
(FEMA 273 p. 6-19)
Allowable Drift Index 0.005 0.010 0.020
Note: Drift index is the ratio of the horizontal roof displacement to the height of the building relative to the ground.
Approximate Empirical Correlations Between the MMI Intensities and the PGA
1. Ca and C are the earthquake near-source effect that defines ground motion
range of the
spectrumv
controlled range
of the spectrum
Make sure that you read through the sections of the FEMA-273 Guidelines and Commentary
or its updated version FEMA 356 before you attempt to apply the NSP and NDP. The
procedures discussed here automate the process but you still need a thorough knowledge of
the method to ensure valid results. Finally, it is emphasized that the PERFORM-3D
documentation for the nonlinear analysis is not intended to, and does not, document the
computational details of nonlinear analysis, but rather is intended to document the
capabilities of PERFORM-3D in the nonlinear analysis and performance assessment for 3D
structures.
Select Start a
new structure
Activate
Modeling
phase
Activate
Nodes task
Click to
change
to 2D
view
Select
Grid tab
Click to
Test
Select
Move
tab
Select
Supports
tab
Activate
Elements
task
Select
New
button
Click
Click Click
Click Click
Activate Add or
delete frames task
Select
New
button
Click to
Accept
Select
Duplicate tab
Click to
Test
Activate
Elements task
Select Add
Elements
tab
Click
Click
Click
Click
Click
Click
Select
New
button
Click
Click
Select
New
button Click
Click
Click
Click
Click
Select
Change
Group
Click to
Move
Select
New
button
Select
Change
Group
Click to
Move
Activate Add
or delete
frames task
Click to change
to Plan View
Select
New
button
Click to
Accept
Select
New
button
Click to
Accept
Select
New
button
Click to
Accept
Select
New
button
Click to
Accept
Activate Add
or delete
frames task
Click to change
to Elevation
View looking
along H1
Select
New
button
Click to
Accept
Activate
Nodes task
Select
Single tab
Click down
arrow
Click to
Test
Activate
Nodes task
Select
Slaving
tab
Click down
arrow
Select
New
button
Click to
Accept
Select
Masses tab
Select
New
button
Click to
Accept
Click down
arrow
Click down
arrow
Note: The behavior of the nonlinear model depends on the properties of the components,
you must be careful when you specify these properties. See Table 6-7 (page 6-21), Table
6-8 (page 6-22), Table 6-18 (page 6-51) and Table 6-19 (page 6-52, Chapter 6, of
FEMA 356 for the Modeling Parameters and Numerical Acceptance Criteria for
Nonlinear Procedures.
Activate
Components
task
Select Cross
Sects tab
Click down
arrow
Select
New
button
Click to
Accept
Click down
arrow
Click to
Calculate
Select
Inelastic
Strength tab
Click to Plot
Select
Inelastic tab
Click down
arrow
Select
New
button
Select Use
Cross Section
Select Deformation
Capacities
Click to
Accept
Click down
arrow
Click down
arrow
Select
Deformation
Capacities
Click to
Check
Select
Compound
tab
Select
New
button
Click to
Accept
Click down
arrow
Click down
arrow
Click down
arrow
Click Add
button
Click down
arrow
Click down
arrow
Click down
arrow
Click to
Check
Select Cross
Sects tab
Click down
arrow
Select
New
button
Click to
Accept
Click down
arrow
Click to
Calculate
Select
Inelastic
Strength tab
Click to
Check
Select
Inelastic tab
Click down
arrow
Select
New
button
Select Use
Cross Section
Select Deformation
Capacities
Click to
Accept
Click down
arrow
Click down
arrow
Select
Deformation
Capacities
Select
Compound
tab
Select
New
button
Click to
Accept
Click down
arrow
Click down
arrow
Click down
arrow
Click down
arrow
Click down
arrow
Click down
arrow
Click Add
button
Click down
arrow
Click down
arrow
Click down
arrow
Activate
Modeling
phase
Activate
Elements task
Click down
arrow
Click
Click
Click
Click Click
Click
Click Click
Click Click
Click Assign
Component
Click down
arrow
Click down
arrow
Click Assign
Click Clear
Selected
Ements
Select
Orientations
tab
Click down
arrow
Click to
select
Click to Test
Click to
Accept
Click down
arrow
Click to
select
Click to Test
Click to
Accept
Click down
arrow
Click to
select
Click to Test
Click to
Accept
Click down
arrow
Click to
select
Click to Test
Click to
Accept
Activate Load
patterns task
Select
New
button
Click to
Accept
Click down
arrow
Click down
arrow
Select
New
button
Click to
Accept
Click down
arrow
Click down
arrow
2. Floor loads due to DL and LL are converted to equivalent distributed loads as follows:
Two-Way Slab System (m = S/L >= 0.50) One-Way Slab System (m = S/L < 0.50)
short span long span short span long span
WS WS⎡3 − m2 ⎤ WS
wS = w L= ⎢ ⎥ w S =0 w L=
3 3 ⎣ 2 ⎦ 2
where: m = S/L S = shorter side L = longer side W = load per unit floor area
wS = equivalent uniformly distributed load @ shorter side
wL = equivalent uniformly distributed load @ longer side
WS 4.6(5)
WS 4.6(5) WS ⎛ 3 - m 2 ⎞ ⎛ 3 - 0.832 ⎞
wwSS== == ==7.7
7.7 kN/m
kN/m wL = ⎜⎜ ⎟⎟ = 7.7 ⎜⎜ ⎟⎟ = 8.9 kN/m
33 33 3 ⎝ 2 ⎠ ⎝ 2 ⎠
WS 4.6(5)
3.6(5) WS ⎛ 3 - m 2 ⎞ ⎛ 3 - 0.832 ⎞
wS = = = 7.7
6 kN/m
kN/m wL = ⎜⎜ ⎟⎟ = 6 ⎜⎜ ⎟⎟ = 6.9 kN/m
3 3 3 ⎝ 2 ⎠ ⎝ 2 ⎠
WS 2.4(5) WS ⎛ 3 - m 2 ⎞ ⎛ 3 - 0.832 ⎞
wS = = = 4 kN/m wL = ⎜ ⎟ = 4 ⎜⎜ ⎟⎟ = 4.6 kN/m
3 3 3 ⎜⎝ 2 ⎟⎠ ⎝ 2 ⎠
WS 1(5) WS ⎛ 3 - m 2 ⎞ ⎛ 3 - 0.832 ⎞
wS = = = 1.7 kN/m wL = ⎜ ⎟ = 1.7 ⎜⎜ ⎟⎟ = 1.9 kN/m
3 3 3 ⎜⎝ 2 ⎟⎠ ⎝ 2 ⎠
Select
Element
Loads tab
Select
New
button
Click to
Accept
Click down
arrow
Click
Click
Click
Click
Click to
Test
Select Define a
new subgroup
Click
Click
Click
Click to
Test
Select Define a
new subgroup
Click
Click to
Test
Click down
arrow
Click
Click
Click
Click
Click to
Test
Click
Click
Click to
Test
Click
Click to
Test
Note:
The self weight of column per unit length was specified in the Compound
component properties.
Select
New
button
Click to
Accept
Click down
arrow
Select
New
button
Click to
Accept
Click down
arrow
In PERFORM-3D a 'drift' is actually a drift ratio. The drift value is the H (Horizontal)
displacement of the upper node minus the H displacement of the lower node, divided by
the V (Vertical) distance between the nodes. In this example problem the node H
displacement δ at the roof level is relative to the ground.
Activate Drifts
and deflections
task
Select
New
button
Click
Select H1
Click
Select
New
button
Select H2 Click
Click
Activate
Structure
sections task
Select
New
button
Click down
arrow
Click Click
Click
Click
Click Click
Click
Click Click
Activate Limit
states task
Select
New
button
NOTE
Click down
arrow
Select
New
button
NOTE
Click down
arrow
Select
New
button
NOTE
Click down
arrow
Click down
arrow
Select
New
button
Select
Highlighted
drifts only
Select
New
button
Select
Highlighted
drifts only
Note:
To start a new analysis, press the toolbar buttons for the Analysis phase and the
Setup load cases task . Load cases are identified by name. For explanations see
Chapter 12, of the User Guide.
Press the toolbar to Run analyses tasks. An 'Analysis Series' allows you to specify
certain other parameters before you run any analyses to set up the structure and the load
cases. For the steps in running analyses, see Chapter 20, of the User Guide.
Activate Setup
load cases task
Click down
arrow
Select
New
button
Select
Element
Click down
arrow
Click to
Add
Click down
arrow
Click to
Add
Select Self
Weight
Click down
arrow
Click to
Add
Click down
arrow
Click down
arrow
Select
New
button
Select
Displacement
Pattern
Click to
Save
Select
New
button
Click to
Save
Select
New
button
Click to
Save
Select
New
button
Click to
Save
Select
New
button
Select Nodal
Load Pattern
Click to
Add
Select
New
button
Click to
Add
There are two load cases (one pair of El Centro ground motion horizontal components,
the E-W component and N-S component) of this type.
* Adjusted El Centro, angle from H1 = 0 degree
* Adjusted El Centro, angle from H1 = 90 degrees
Click down
arrow
Click to Add
Earthquake
Select
New
button
Click to Read
and Plot the
Earthquake
Click to Read
and Plot the
Earthquake
Select
New
button
Click to
Accept
Click to
Save
Select
New
button
Click to
Save
Activate Setup
Run analyses
task
Select Modal
Damping tab
Select Rayleigh
Damping tab
Click to
Draw the
Graph
Click to Add in
the Analysis List
Click down
arrow
Click down
arrow
Click to Add in
the Analysis List
Click down
arrow
Click down
arrow
Click to Add in
the Analysis List
Click down
arrow
Click to Add in
the Analysis List
Activate Limit
State Groups
Click New to
specify group
name
Click down
arrow
Click New to
specify group
name
Click New to
specify group
name
Note:
Under behavior assessment tasks the following toolbars will be activated one at a time:
1. Modal Analysis Results
2. Energy Balance
3. Deflected Shapes
4. Time Histories
Activate Modal
Analysis Results
Activate Energy
Balance task
Activate
Deflected Shapes
task
Click down
arrow
Select Limit
States tab
Click down
arrow
Click to
Close
Activate Time
Histories task
Click down
arrow
Note:
Under demand-capacity tasks the following toolbars will be activated one at a time:
1. General Push-over Plot
2. Target Displacement Push-over Plot
3. Usage Ratio Graphs
Activate General
Push-over Plot
task
Click
Click
Click
Click down
arrow
Click
Click
Click
Select
Spectra
Type in 1
Activate Target
Displacement
Push-over Plot
task
Type in 1
Click
Type in 1
Click Click
Activate General
Push-over Plot
task
Type in
0.006209
Performance assessment in dynamic analysis only depends on the limit state usage ratios.
Limit states were specified in the Limit States task, and limit groups in the Set up limit
state groups task.
Click down
arrow
Displacement Response
• Looking at the Target Displacement Pushover Plot considering Life Safety limit state,
the target drift ratio δ/V that will not exceed Demand/Capacity ratio (usage ratio) is
0.006209. It means that δ/V = 0.006209 is the reliable drift ratio of a building as it
reaches the Life Safety performance level. Correspondingly the reliable displacement
capacity of a building as it reaches Life Safety level will be δ = 0.006209 (21.75) which
is equal to 0.135 meter relative to the ground.
• Looking at the Deflected Shapes considering Collapse Prevention limit state, the
reference drift ratio δ/V that will not exceed Demand/Capacity ratio (usage ratio) is
0.01395. It means that δ/V = 0.01395 is the reliable drift ratio of a building as it
reaches its limit of structural stability. Correspondingly the reliable displacement
capacity of a building as it reaches its limit of structural stability will be δ = 0.01395
(21.75) = 0.3034 meter relative to the ground.
• There is a possibility that the column in the first story will be damaged when the drift
ratio exceeds 0.01395 or the lateral displacement relative to the ground exceeds 0.3034
meter.
• Since the computed drift ratio (δ/V) = 0.01395) is less than idealized inelastic drift
index of 0.02 and the inelastic response of the building in the earthquake design level
shows life safety capacity, the design of the building is within Life Safety and Collapse
Prevention performance objectives.
• The overall result of the pushover analysis in load case, H1 push uniform load,
indicated that the capacity and ductility of the seven story RC building is adequate to
sustain the severe earthquake excitation, and some members of the moment resisting
frame remain elastic and thus maintain the stability of the building structure.