Lobotomy Gets Them Home

Broadly speaking, our perceptions are based on complex brain formulae that we
build upon. The brain's raw material to base experience is harvested by our senses,
such as sight to determine what to make of collections of colour and sound for
example. If colour is a length of a given light, or sound is the frequency of a
vibration in the air clapped into the equipment of our eardrum, then it is possible
to start to unpick the perpetual bombardment through the resolution of
transmitted opinion and agenda of converging forms of mass communication.

New forms of meaning and value, ie we act according to established societal rules
in many cases. The paint from which someone constructs their reality, the
sharpness and sensitivity of your brush ead depends whether your ‘mass
standardized’ or made of rarer paint! When light refracts the flash of danger, and
the vibrations in the air are filled with bad news then what do you start to believe
in? We're creatures looking for attachment to people and things, we need to
charge our libido by these means, and stimulate the direction of our energy.
"Remember to report the 'runners'", "Get the police to patrol the roundabouts". A
quote from Heraclitus, "Sooner or later everything runs into its opposite".

The transmutation of the libido through symbols has been going on since the dawn
of civilization (Jung 1970). We can detach a degree of energy from instinct, and
clarify a defined free will over time, which is an observable quality of our evolution
from recent ancestors. Symbols continue to charge our libido, and figuratively, we
can construct narratives based on them, and their place in time. What are you
following?

"I am but mad north-north-west. When the wind is southerly, I

know a hawk from a handsaw." Shakespeare

Human history allows the observer to trace the tendencies and conditions of our
shared cultures around the world.
Linage of ideas of earlier incarnations of humans cultures found mythologies with
common themes around the world where similar anecdotes of theology of the key
constituents of life, death, the women and the man, nature and various topics that
form principal and ethics have symmetrical content in the narratives of their
meanings. These people were not determined to form mythology with influence of
the technologies of OUR time, so this void was shaped more by the vacuum of
instinct, a purer correlation to direct experience of self environment, rather than
reported environment that mass communication allows. From this perspective I
would hypothesize that mass communication is an impurity in the process of
understanding the axioms of the mind body.

The common truth seems to be something like ‘we experience the world more
directly from our own histories and circumstances, etched within the wider lens of
mass humanity’. This has hereditary consequences. Necrosis of possibility has lived
and died in such conditions. The biologic goal remains to be attuned and rational on
impulse, harmonized by the illness of universal consequences.

Perhaps circumstance, a desire to associate your opinion with others out of a blind
truth, or a fear of being wrong can change the way someone reaches a conclusion.
Jung said to think is to reach a conclusion, but to feel is to place a value on
something. So to think and to feel are slightly different modes of function. It's
possible that someone can confuse the way they think with how they feel, I guess I
am severely guilty at various times.

An example to consider the difference is 'thinking' is to apply the same pathology

to ants as to antelopes, it is to construct reality in scientific terms of constant
facts, and to build a life where everything that happens is anticipated and to be
expected. Feelings are based on asymmetrical facts, given a consistency by their
user, a hierarchy of practical use. They may not make the same sense to someone
else. Shapes of behavior or observable decisions in life that are hard to
understand is the best example.

Both are equally useful ways to interpret the world, and can be interchangeably
applied, but the difference in how borrowed meaning is developed should be traced
back to its roots. So what someone considers necessary based on a whim of a
feeling is not useful, just as a judgement may be made through non sequitur
application of thought, assuming that the same prevalence will occur again.
Try To Come In Old

'Mainstream' and the archetype, and how this process manifests ‘art’. It is worth
understanding what archetype means before carrying on. A basic definition is
something like ' a common example of a certain type of person or thing developed
though time'.

Art can be considered anything and everything by a fast and loose definition, but
esteemed art must personify awareness in a collective group. Otherwise it is
perhaps idiosyncratic 'art', or art which is too sophisticated for the place and time
it inhabits, and is a heirloom for another time and place to divulge meaning. The
open mind is awake to possibility that anything may be worth its salt, and that is
the puzzlement of art!

Huxley (1962) suggests that art is a vehicle of numerous other fields, it is the
unconscious birthplace of ideas realized, a reliable example being technological
advancement that seems to precede hypothetical technologies developed in Sci Fi
film. Under the guise of art, it is possible to contemplate and view collective
unconscious thoughts through the passage of the dream, brought to life in the
arts. How contaminated this process becomes in the present time is an interesting
debate, and whether the markets reduce pure formations of art to specific means
to an end is alarming. The panopticon model has become efficient to a level where
mass surveillance is considered a good idea to be applied almost indiscriminately,
rather than formerly of the prison system. This technology is morally neutral, but
its pliability can become powerfully out of control, where facial recognition is used
in such a central way that the dictum of blame takes on an automated process.

Mainstream funneled mythology where the purity of the art has been diminished
and cross contaminated by the markets. Guiding parable of the ancestral culture,
resplendent, iridescent images of old stories and symbols.

Consumers of mainstream art do not benefit from witnessing definition or high

resolution realness in cultural depictions of occult works, where to identify meaning
is a muscle being worked on. 'Bringing the world to life' is based on a prism of
perspective (like the one of The Dark Side Of The Moon album cover!).
You have to clarify what you want to see based on that you've decided is the
pictorial meaning and connection to worlds, related to your imagination's eye. If
you go to the job and become absorbed in the mundane, then you lose a sharpness
for clarity seeing brand new as you learn to not subject your mind to learning from
new experiences, if your experiences are mostly the same. You become one thing
with one solution, and do yourself in pursuing one thing. You're on autopilot,
periodically interrupting yourself with reflections of time, where it isn't clear of
its value. You see where you're going, and then become surprised when you're in
the same time grove, but somewhere different.

Like had the ambition, but don't know what to do when you ‘get there’, or get to
imagination's end, and then ran out of ideas of what to do next. Got the money, but
don't know how to spend it, so spend it badly on other people's dreams, so they can
watch me at it.

The quote by Heraclitus seems to apply, likewise even to this essay. The
explanation of history and behavior trying to culminate into some form of truth.
Like moaning about supermarkets, and then realizing your out of bread and milk at
8pm- and you NEED to have Porridge tomorrow morning.

So history grows the monologue of the thought process, dictated by the unknown
anticipation of the future!!!!

Refermentations

• An Introduction To Jung Psychology By Frieda Fordham

• Jung Selected Writings By Anthony Storr
• Aldous Huxley Lecture On Human Potential
• Aldous Huxley Berkley Speech- The Ultimate Revolution
• Battle For The Mind By William Sargent
• Flow My Tears, The Policeman Said By Phillip K Dick