Professional Documents
Culture Documents
emotional well-being
Guided by systems theory, this mixed-methods study of 98 families examined parent- and
child-reported play, exploration, and leisure activities in relation to family members' socio-
emotional well-being. Parents and children completed surveys independently and
interviews were conducted with a subset of families. Quantitative findings showed that
child report of secure exploration with both parents, and mother report of leisure activities,
were associated with some couple and parent–child well-being indicators and nearly all
child well-being indicators. Father report of play and leisure activities was associated with
more couple and parent–child well-being indicators than mother report and showed some
differences in associations with child well-being indicators. Interview data provided
examples of how families incorporate play and leisure into their busy lives and the
perceived benefits and enjoyment derived from these activities. These findings emphasize
the importance of family play and leisure involvement for parents' and children's well-
being.
Lee, B.J., Yoo, M.S. Family, School, and Community Correlates of Children’s Subjective
Well-being: An International Comparative Study. Child Ind Res 8, 151–175 (2015).
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-014-9285-z
The primary purposes of this study are twofold: to examine how family, school, and
community factors are related to children’s subjective well-being; and to examine the
patterns of the relationships between family, school, and community variables and
children’s subjective well-being across nations. We use the data from the pilot study of the
International Survey of Children’s Well-Being for our analysis. We use multiple regression
and multilevel methods in the study. We find that family, school, and community lives all
significantly affect the levels of children’s subjective well-being. We also find that family,
school, and community lives of children are important predictors of subjective well-being
even after controlling for the country-specific cultural and contextual factors. We find that
the economic variables of GDP and inequality are not significant factors predicting
children’s subjective well-being. Rather it is the nature of children’s relationships with
immediate surrounding environments, such as frequency of family activities, frequency of
peer activities, and neighborhood safety, are most consistently related to the levels of
children’s subjective well-being across the nations.
Family play and leisure activities: correlates of parents' and children's socio-
emotional well-being
https://www.aihw.gov.au/getmedia/30d3e529-a599-4b39-a30b-8ac63c6617b2/AW15-3-1-
role-of-family-in-child-wellbeing.pdf.aspx
The first years of a child’s life provide lifelong foundations for health, development and
wellbeing. Healthy development requires that children grow and learn in supportive and
nurturing families and environments. A child’s brain and biological development begins
before birth and continues well into adolescence. Children who have a poor start in life are
more likely than others to develop problems with health, development, learning and
behaviours. These problems may have a cumulative effect over the life course, which can
affect capacity to fully participate in society, resulting in increased inequality in social
status or social opportunity, reduced labour force participation and entrenched
intergenerational disadvantage (National Scientific Council on the Developing Child
2005/2014).
https://www.researchgate.net/deref/http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org
%2F10.1111%2Fcp.12059?_sg
%5B0%5D=bN1AnX17RXaXpQQrLLBlaIuoozWar_lYqaH1NrVIT3d6myeS0yqBNHDaJ
oQvzaFCwJcIHsaIl8a3aiO2NtEZoeBYFg.JZoEuSUYJS38e9PwsybKbGpBfRH5Cx9zLD
mMZS8o_EAhZJBfI7yANyoZ6kkrofGc1IhMtMmgscfT5RViuJpH7Q
Family well-being provides a foundation for positive parenting and child well-being. Many
previous studies have outlined the possible connections between family well-being,
parenting, and child well-being, yet translating research into practice continues to be
problematic. The purpose of this article is to review the current literature (from 2000 to
2014) on family and child well-being in order to create a model of well-being that is useful
for both researchers and practitioners. The model builds upon Bronfenbrenner's Ecological
Systems Theory, and is differentiated from other prominent models of family functioning
by focusing on bolstering family strengths and well-being (as opposed to ameliorating
family stress, risk, or deficits) and on supporting child well-being (as opposed to treating
maladjustment). The model addresses family well-being (parental well-being, family self-
sufficiency, and family resiliency), developmental parenting (affection, responsiveness,
encouragement, teaching, engagement, positive discipline, and co-parenting), and child
well-being (physical and mental health, self-regulation, social and cognitive competence).
Direct and indirect connections between model components and possible moderating
factors are discussed. A theory of change model is proposed as a tool for practitioners from
a variety of disciplines and fields to guide their work with families. Recommendations for
clinicians, limitations of the model, and future directions are discussed.
Fomby, P., & Cherlin, A. J. (2007). Family Instability and Child Well-Being. American
sociological review, 72(2), 181–204. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240707200203
Past research suggests that children who experience multiple transitions in family structure
may face worse developmental outcomes than children raised in stable two-parent families
and perhaps even children raised in stable, single-parent families. However, multiple
transitions and negative child outcomes may be associated because of common causal
factors such as parents’ antecedent behaviors and attributes. Using a nationally-
representative, two-generation longitudinal survey that includes detailed information on
children’s behavioral and cognitive development, family history, and mother’s attributes
prior to the child’s birth, we examine these alternative hypotheses. Our results suggest that,
for white children, the association between the number of family structure transitions and
cognitive outcomes is largely explained by mother’s prior characteristics but that the
association between the number of transitions and behavioral outcomes may be causal in
part. We find no robust effects of number of transitions for black children.
https://observatoriosociallacaixa.org/documents/22890/140842/baixa_DOSSIER6_CAST.p
df/00789ea0-e93c-de65-fdb8-05c4bc6dd287
Barómetro
Artículos
18 ¿Qué factores familiares afectan al desarrollo escolar de los hijos?, por Diederik
Boertien
En Colombia:
http://www.scielo.org.co/pdf/encu/v16n1/1692-5858-encu-16-01-00078.pdf