Professional Documents
Culture Documents
net/publication/45114801
CITATIONS READS
44 165
6 authors, including:
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
Working on the project SpeCIMeN: Specific Care on the Interface of Mental health and Nursing home. View project
All content following this page was uploaded by Smc Rasquin on 16 July 2015.
Figures in parentheses are standard deviations; IDDD = Interview for Deterioration in Daily Life in Demen-
tia.
1
Z scores.
The aim of this study was to investigate the relation ble) and an SCL-90 at baseline. Patients with neurological deficits
between psychiatric symptoms and cognitive perfor- other than stroke or major psychiatric disorders were excluded
from the study. Severe aphasia, precluding an adequate communi-
mance following stroke. As cognitive deficits are common
cation for the informed consent procedure, was also an exclusion
in patients with psychiatric symptoms [20–22], we hy- criterion. The Medical Ethics Board of the University Hospital
pothesized that psychiatric symptoms are associated with Maastricht approved the study, and all participants gave informed
an increased risk of subsequent cognitive decline. consent.
Patients were asked within 48 h of stroke to participate in the
study and were administered a clinical and neuropsychological ex-
amination at 1, 6, 12 and 24 months after stroke.
Methods One hundred and ninety-six patients participated in the CO-
DAS study. Ten patients (5.1%) could not fill out the SCL-90 due
Procedure to severe cognitive deficits, 30 patients (15.3%) refused assessment
The present study was a 2-year follow-up study, with 1-, 6-, 12- with the SCL-90. At baseline, the SCL-90 was administered to 156
and 24-month assessments, of a cohort of patients who suffered patients.
from stroke. Baseline measures include, besides demographic and Table 1 presents the baseline characteristics of the partici-
neurological variables, an assessment of psychiatric functioning pants.
(Symptom Checklist, 90 items; SCL-90) and a cognitive test bat-
tery. Both the SCL-90 and the test battery were administered at Medical Assessment
each assessment. Primary outcome was cognitive status (dementia/ Medical information was collected directly after the patients
mild cognitive impairment, MCI/normal) and whether there was had come to the hospital because of stroke symptoms and entered
decline in cognitive functioning. into the Maastricht Stroke Register, a prospective databank [26].
This databank contains information on all stroke patients referred
Patients to the Department of Neurology of the University Hospital of
Patients were participants of the CODAS study (Cognitive Dis- Maastricht and included data about neurological examination,
orders after Stroke), a 2-year prospective study, which has been brain imaging, clinical information, risk factors such as the pres-
described earlier [4, 23–25]. Patients were included in the study if ence of diabetes, hypertension, cholesterol, heart failure in the past,
they had had a first-ever hemispheric stroke, were older than 40 family history of vascular diseases and clinical diagnosis of the
years, had post-stroke adequate fluency in Dutch, had an initial stroke syndrome and the CT/MRI scan data.
MMSE 615 (to ensure that neuropsychological testing was possi-
Table 4. Risk for people with psychiatric symptoms for VaD or post-stroke MCI
Agoraphobia 10/14 (71.4) 3.6 0.9–14.7 49/112 (43.8) 1.1 0.5–2.7 11/27 (40.7)
Anxiety 8/14 (57.1) 2.1 0.6–7.6 43/113 (38.0) 0.9 0.4–2.7 11/28 (39.3)
Depression 12/14 (85.7) 8.0 1.5–42.7* 52/113 (46.0) 1.1 0.5–2.6 12/28 (42.9)
Somatization 9/14 (64.3) 1.2 0.3–4.4 63/113 (55.8) 0.8 0.4–1.9 17/28 (60.7)
Insufficiency 13/15 (86.7) 7.5 1.4–39.5* 62/113 (54.9) 1.4 0.6–3.2 13/28 (46.4)
Sensitivity 7/14 (50.0) 3.0 0.8–11.6 28/113 (24.8) 0.9 0.4–2.6 7/28 (25.0)
Hostility 7/14 (50.0) 3.0 0.8–11.6 25/113 (22.1) 0.9 0.3–2.2 7/28 (25.0)
Sleep 7/15 (46.7) 0.8 0.2–2.7 48/113 (42.5) 0.7 0.3–1.5 15/28 (53.5)
Total 12/14 (85.7) 6.9 1.3–36.8* 61/113 (53.9) 1.4 0.6–3.1 13/28 (46.4)
Figures in parentheses are percentages. sympt./total = Number of patients with psychiatric symptoms/total
number of patients who filled in the subscale; OR = odds ratio; CI = confidence interval. * p < 0.05.
only the presence of depression, insufficiency of thinking symptoms and those without. Table 5 presents data of
and acting and total score on the SCL-90 were signifi- cognitive decline on the CAMCOG.
cantly more often present in patients with VaD. Patients who had overall psychiatric symptoms or with
Patients with psychiatric symptoms were compared to specific symptoms of anxiety or depression decline more
patients without these symptoms with regard to the course often compared to patients with few or no psychiatric
of cognitive functioning. Patients with psychiatric symp- symptoms. Patients with psychiatric symptoms declined
toms declined more often on executive functioning (2 = on average 10.1 (SD 6.6) points on the CAMCOG from
5.1, d.f. = 2, p = 0.08) and on the CAMCOG (2 = 5.7, 1 to 6 months, whereas patients with few or no psychiat-
d.f. = 2, p = 0.049) from 1 month to 6 months after stroke, ric symptoms declined with a mean of 7.8 (SD 3.3) points.
and on the test that measured mental speed from 6 to 24 From 6 to 24 months, this decline was lower (2.8 points
months after stroke (2 = 5.9, d.f. = 2, p = 0.05). In the for the patients with psychiatric symptoms and 0.3 points
other cognitive domains, the course of cognitive function- for the patients without psychiatric symptoms).
ing was comparable between patients with psychiatric
Figures in parentheses are percentages. * p < 0.05. decl.+/sympt.+ = Number of patients with psychiatric symp-
toms who declined/number of patients with psychiatric symptoms; decl.–/sympt.– = number of patients without
psychiatric symptoms who declined/ number of patients without psychiatric symptoms.
The incident cases of VaD or MCI were too few to Patients who were diagnosed at baseline of having
perform valid multiple regression analyses. Therefore, we VaD reported more often psychiatric symptoms, com-
could only perform analyses in which we compared pa- pared to patients with MCI or no cognitive deficits (85.7%
tients who declined on cognitive performance (assessed compared to 53.9 and 46.4%, respectively). In general,
with the CAMCOG) to those who improved, and found more patients with MCI reported psychiatric symptoms
that patients who declined had more often a territorial compared to patients without any cognitive deficits, al-
stroke (28.8% of the patients who declined had a territo- though this was not found for all subscales of the SCL-90.
rial infarct, in contrast to only 3.8% of the patients who The absence of an association between psychiatric deficits
improved; 2 = 5.9, d.f. = 1, p = 0.02). We also compared and post-stroke MCI could be related to the fact that the
patients with psychiatric symptoms to those without concept of MCI is heterogeneous. However, none of the
these symptoms and found that patients with psychiatric patients with MCI had interference with daily life due to
symptoms have lower baseline MMSE scores (mean 25.3, their cognitive deficits. Incident cases of VaD and MCI
SD 3.5) compared to patients with few or no psychiatric were too few to perform valid multiple regression analy-
symptoms (mean 26.7, SD 2.9; t = 2.5, d.f. = 153, p = sis, therefore we could not define whether psychiatric
0.01). symptoms predict independently the development of a
cognitive disorder. We found differences with regard to
demographic and stroke-related variables between pa-
Discussion tients with VaD and patients with MCI and also between
patients who declined and those who did not. In future
In this study we investigated whether stroke patients research, the independent contribution of these variables
with psychiatric symptoms at baseline showed more cog- to deterioration of cognitive functioning after stroke
nitive decline compared to patients with few or no psy- should be investigated in larger samples.
chiatric symptoms. More than 50% of the stroke patients This is the first study that investigated a broader range
reported psychiatric symptoms up to 2 years after the of psychiatric symptoms after stroke. Most of the psychi-
event. Psychiatric symptoms were most prevalent (85%) atric symptoms reported concerned somatization and in-
among patients with a post-stroke diagnosis of VaD. The sufficiency of thinking and acting, which might be ex-
presence of psychiatric symptoms was predictive of sub- pected in people with physical handicaps and cognitive
sequent decline in executive functioning, mental speed deficits due to a stroke. Depressive symptoms were also
and global cognitive functioning on the CAMCOG, in the common, as has been reported by others [9–12, 44].
period from 1 to 6 months after stroke.
1 Tatemichi TK, Desmond DW, Mayeau R, 16 House A, Dennis M, Warlow C, Hawton K, 33 Bowler JV, Hadar U, Wade JP: Cognition in
Paik M, et al: Dementia after stroke: Baseline Molyneux A: The relationship between intel- stroke. Acta Neurol Scand 1994;90:424–429.
frequency, risks, and clinical features in a hos- lectual impairment and mood disorder in the 34 Gerritsen MJ, Berg IJ, Deelman BG, Visser-
pitalized cohort. Neurology 1992; 42: 1185– first year after stroke. Psychol Med 1990; 20: Keizer AC, Meyboom-de Jong B: Speed of in-
1193. 805–814. formation processing after unilateral stroke. J
2 Tatemichi TK, Desmond DW, Stern Y, Paik 17 Robinson RG, Bolla-Wilson K, Kaplan E, Clin Exp Neuropsychol 2003;25:1–13.
M, et al: Cognitive impairment after stroke: Lipsey JR, Price TR: Depression influences in- 35 Derogatis LR, Lipman RS, Covi L: SCL-90: An
Frequency, patterns, and relationship to func- tellectual impairment in stroke patients. Br J outpatient psychiatric rating scale – Prelimi-
tional abilities. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry Psychiatry 1986;148:541–547. nary report. Psychopharmacol Bull 1973; 9:
1994;57:202–207. 18 Shimoda K, Robinson RG: Effects of anxiety 13–28.
3 Treves TA, Aronovich BD, Bornstein NM, Ko- disorder on impairment and recovery from 36 Arrindell WA, Ettema JHM: Symptom Check-
rczyn AD: Risk of dementia after a first-ever stroke. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci 1998; list (Handleiding bij een multidimensionele
ischemic stroke: A 3-year longitudinal study. 10:34–40. psychopathologie-indicator). Lisse, Swets &
Cerebrovasc Dis 1997;7:48–52. 19 Bowler JV: The concept of vascular cognitive im- Zeitlinger, 2003.
4 Rasquin SMC, Lodder J, Ponds RW, Winkens pairment. J Neurol Sci 2002;203–204:11–15. 37 Aben I, Verhey FRJ, Lousberg R, Lodder J,
I, Jolles J, Verhey FRJ: Cognitive functioning 20 Grant MM, Thase ME, Sweeney JA: Cognitive Honig A: Validity of the beck depression in-
after stroke: A one-year follow-up study. De- disturbance in outpatient depressed younger ventory, hospital anxiety and depression scale,
ment Geriatr Cogn Disord 2004;18:138–144. adults: Evidence of modest impairment. Biol SCL-90, and Hamilton depression rating scale
5 Pohjasvaara T, Erkinjuntti T, Vataja R, Kaste Psychiatry 2001;50:35–43. as screening instruments for depression in
M: Dementia three months after stroke: Base- 21 Purcell R, Meruff, Kyrias M, Pantelis C: Neu- stroke patients. Psychosomatics 2002;43:386–
line frequency and effect of different defini- ropsychological function in young patients 393.
tions of dementia in the Helsinki Stroke Aging with unipolar major depression. Psychol Med 38 Rasquin SMC, Lodder J, Visser PJ, Lousberg
Memory Study (SAM) cohort. Stroke 1997;28: 1997;27:1277–1285. R, Verhey FR: Predictive accuracy of MCI-
785–792. 22 Wilson RS, Mendes De Leon CF, Bennett DA, subtypes for Alzheimer’s disease and vascular
6 Pohjasvaara T, Mantyla R, Ylikoski R, Kaste Bienias JL, Evans DA: Depressive symptoms dementia in subjects with mild cognitive im-
M, Erkinjuntti T: Comparison of different clin- and cognitive decline in a community popula- pairment: A 2-year follow-up study. Dement
ical criteria (DSM-III, ADDTC, ICD-10, tion of older persons. J Neurol Neurosurg Psy- Geriatr Cogn Disord 2004;19:113–119.
NINDS-AIREN, DSM-IV) for the diagnosis chiatry 2004;75:126–129. 39 Rasquin SMC, Lodder J, Verhey FRJ: Predic-
of vascular dementia. National Institute of 23 Rasquin SMC, Verhey FRJ, Lousberg R, tors of reversible mild cognitive impairment
Neurological Disorders and Stroke/Associa- Winkens I, Jolles J, Lodder J: Vascular cogni- after stroke: A two year follow-up study. J Neu-
tion Internationale pour la Recherche et tive disorders. Memory, mental speed and cog- rol Sci, in press.
l’Enseignement en Neurosciences. Stroke nitive flexibility after stroke. J Neurol Sci 2002; 40 Teunisse S, Derix MM: Measurement of ac-
2000;31:2952–2957. 203–204:115–119. tivities of daily living in patients with dementia
7 Verhey FRJ, Lodder J, Rozendaal N, Jolles J: 24 Rasquin SMC, Verhey FRJ, van Oostenbrugge living at home: Development of a question-
Comparison of seven sets of criteria used for RJ, Lousberg R, Lodder J: Demographic and naire. Tijdschr Gerontol Geriatr 1991;22:53–
the diagnosis of vascular dementia. Neuroepi- CT-scan features related to cognitive impair- 59.
demiology 1996;15:166–172. ment in the first year after stroke. J Neurol 41 Petersen RC, Doody R, Kurz A, Mohs RC, et
8 Wetterling T, Kanitz RD, Borgis KJ: Compar- Neurosurg Psychiatry 2004;75:1562–1567. al: Current concepts in mild cognitive impair-
ison of different diagnostic criteria for vascular 25 Jolles J, Houx PJ, van Boxtel MPJ, Ponds ment. Arch Neurol 2001;58:1985–1992.
dementia (ADDTC, DSM-IV, ICD-10, RWHM: The Maastricht Aging Study: Deter- 42 Cullum S, Huppert F, McGee M, Dening T,
NINDS-AIREN). Stroke 1996;27:30–36. minants of Cognitive Aging. Maastricht, Neu- Ahmed A, Paykel ES, Rayne C: Decline across
9 Chemerinski E, Robinson RG: The neuropsy- ropsych Publishers, 1995. different domains of cognitive function in nor-
chiatry of stroke. Psychosomatics 2000; 41: 5– 26 de Jong G, van Raak L, Kessels F, Lodder J: mal ageing: Results of a longitudinal popula-
14. Stroke subtype and mortality: a follow-up tion-based study using CAMCOG. Int J Geri-
10 Robinson RG: Neuropsychiatric consequenc- study in 998 patients with a first cerebral in- atr Psychiatry 2000;15:853–862.
es of stroke. Annu Rev Med 1997; 48: 217– farct. J Clin Epidemiol 2003;56:262–268. 43 Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS: Using Multivariate
229. 27 Roman GC, Tatemichi TK, Erkinjuntti T, Statistics. Boston, Allyn & Bacon, 2001.
11 Johnson GA: Research into psychiatric disor- Cumming JL, et al: Vascular dementia: Diag- 44 Robinson RG: Poststroke depression: Preva-
der after stroke: The need for further studies. nostic criteria for research studies. Report of lence, diagnosis, treatment, and disease pro-
Aust NZ J Psychiatry 1991;25: 358–370. the NINDS-AIREN International Workshop. gression. Biol Psychiatry 2003;54:376–387.
12 Aben I, Verhey FRJ, Honig A, Lodder J, et al: Neurology 1993;43:250–260. 45 Aben I: Post Stroke Depression: The Need for
Research into the specificity of depression after 28 Brand PA, Jolles J: Learning and retrieval rate a Bio-Psycho-Social Approach; doctoral thesis,
stroke: A review on an unresolved issue. Prog of words presented auditorially and visually. J University of Maastricht, 2004.
Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 2001; Gen Psychol 1985;112:201–210. 46 Carson AJ, Macttale S, Aller K, Lawrie SM, et
25:671–689. 29 Houx PJ, Jolles J, Vreeling FW: Stroop inter- al: Depression after stroke and lesion location:
13 Aben I, Verhey FRJ, Strik J, Lousberg R, et al: ference: Aging effects assessed with the Stroop A systematic review. Lancet 2000; 356: 122–
A comparative study into the one year cumula- Color-Word Test. Exp Aging Res 1993; 19: 126.
tive incidence of depression after stroke and 204–224. 47 Castillo CS, Starkstein SE, Fedoroff JP, Price
myocardial infarction. J Neurol Neurosurg 30 Vink M, Jolles J: A new version of the Trail- TR, Robinson RG: Generalized anxiety disor-
Psychiatry 2003;74:581–585. Making Test as an information processing task. der after stroke. J Nerv Ment Dis 1993; 181:
14 Downhill JE, Robinson R: Longitudinal as- J Clin Neuropsychol 1985;7:162. 100–106.
sessment of depression and cognitive impair- 31 Luteijn F, van der Ploeg FAE: Manual Gron- 48 Hochstenbach JB, den Otter R, Mulder TW:
ment following stroke. J Nerv Ment Dis 1994; inger Intelligence Test. Lisse, Swets & Cognitive recovery after stroke: A 2-year fol-
182:425–431. Zeitlinger, 1983. low-up. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2003; 84:
15 Murata Y, Kimura M, Robinson RG: Does 32 Verhey FRJ, Huppert FA, Korten ECM, Houx 1499–1504.
cognitive impairment cause post-stroke de- PJ, et al: Cross-sectional comparison of the 49 Turner-Stokes L: Poststroke depression: Get-
pression? Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 2000; 8: Cambridge Cognitive Examination revised: ting the full picture. Lancet 2003; 361: 1757–
310–317. The CAMCOG-R. Age Aging 2003;32:1–7. 1758.