You are on page 1of 38

Chapter Three - Project Management Structure

Chapter Objectives:
• To Identify and understand the different types of project
organization
• To choose the appropriate project management structure
• To appreciate the role of culture in project organization

Tsegabrhan Mekonen (PhD) 1


Project Management Structures
• To manage a project, project owner (a company…) has
to set up a project organization, which can supply the
resources for the project and provide service during its
life cycle
• It explains how the activities of the project and the
people involved are organized.
• A project structure defines the lines of authority,
responsibility, accountability, communication
framework, work centers…
• An effective organization ensures that clear lines of
authority exist, and that every member of the project
knows what he or she must do to make the project a
success Tsegabrhan Mekonen (PhD) 2
Why Organize the Work?
• Provides a basis for organizing the project

– Budget and estimates


– Schedule and tracking
– Documentation
– Personnel assignments

Tsegabrhan Mekonen (PhD) 3


Project Management Structures
• Challenges to Organizing Projects
– The uniqueness and short duration of projects
relative to ongoing longer-term organizational
activities
– The multidisciplinary and cross-functional nature of
projects creates authority and responsibility
dilemmas.
• Choosing an Appropriate Project Management
Structure
– The best system balances
the needs of the project
with the needs of the
Tsegabrhan Mekonen (PhD) 4
Project Organogram
• The structure of project organization is
important for the smooth functioning of the
project.
• There are three main types of project organizations
in practice:
– Functional project organization
– Pure Project organization
– Matrix

Tsegabrhan Mekonen (PhD) 5


Project Management Structures

• Organizing Projects: Functional organization


– It uses functional units of the parent organization as
home for the project
– Different segments of the project are delegated
to respective functional units.
– Coordination is maintained through normal
management channels.
– Used when the interest of one functional area
dominates the project or one functional area has a
dominant interest in the project’s success.
Tsegabrhan Mekonen (PhD) 6
Cont’d
1. The Project as part of the functional organization
Proj. Coordination
CEO

Production Engineering … Marketing ….


Manager

Staff Staff Staff

Staff Staff

The circled boxes represent staffs engaged in the project


Tsegabrhan Mekonen (PhD) 7
Functional Organizations

8
Tsegabrhan Mekonen (PhD)
Cont’d
Characteristics Functional Org Structure

Project Mgr’s Authority Little

Resource Availability Little

Who controls project budget Functional Manager

Project Mgr’s Role Part-time

Project Mgr Admin Staff Part-time


Tsegabrhan Mekonen (PhD) 9
Functional Organization of Projects
• Disadvantages
• Advantages
1. Less focus on the project
1. No Structural Change
2. Problem of shared
2. Flexibility in the use of responsibility/ lack of
staff ownership
3. In-Depth Expertise & 3. Poor Integration/ lack of
an expert can be used coordinated effort
by many projects
4. Slow and Sub-optimization of
4. Knowledge sharing is the project
easy
5. Weak individual motivation
5. Individual
development 6. Does not facilitate holistic
Tsegabrhan Mekonen (PhD)approach 10
Project Management Structures (cont’d)

2. Organizing Projects: Pure Project/ Projectized


organization
– Dedicated Teams
– Teams operate as separate units under the
leadership of a full-time project manager.
– In a projectized organization where projects are the
dominant form of business, functional departments
are responsible for providing support for its teams.

Tsegabrhan Mekonen (PhD) 11


Cont’d
Pure project organization

Project Manager

Production Engineering … Marketing ….


Manager

Line A Mechanical Product B

Tsegabrhan Mekonen (PhD) 12


Cont’d….
Pure Project/Projectised organization

CEO

Project Project Project


Manager Manager Manager

Staff Staff Staff

Staff Staff Staff

Staff Staff Staff

(Circled boxes represent staff engaged in project activities.)


Tsegabrhan Mekonen (PhD) 13
Projectized Organizational Structure

Tsegabrhan Mekonen (PhD) 14


Dedicated Project Team

Tsegabrhan Mekonen (PhD) 15


Cont’d
Projectized
Characteristics
Org Structure

Project Mgr’s Authority High to Almost Total

Resource Availability High to Almost Total

Who controls project budget Project Manager

Project Mgr’s Role Full-time

Project Mgr Admin Staff Full-time

Tsegabrhan Mekonen (PhD) 16


Cont’d

• Advantages • Disadvantages
1. Simple and short 1. Expensive
communication 2. Effort duplication
2. PM will have full 3. Creates inconsistency in
responsibility & the application &
authority procedure of the parent
3. Fast decision making company
and unity of command 4. Distort the staff
4. Cohesive and tends to relationship with parent:
support holistic problem of
approach “projectitis”…”WE”
5. Cross-Functional 5. The worry of “life after
Integration the project”
Tsegabrhan Mekonen (PhD) 17
cont’d
3.Organizing Projects: Matrix Structure
– Hybrid organizational structure (matrix) is
overlaid on the normal functional structure.
• Two chains of command (functional and project)
• Project participants report simultaneously to both
functional and project managers.
– Matrix structure optimizes the use of
resources.
• Allows for participation on multiple projects while
performing normal functional duties.
• Achieves a greater integration of expertise and
project requirements.
Tsegabrhan Mekonen (PhD) 18
Cont’d….
Matrix Project organization

CEO

Project Dept HR Dept Finance Dept

Mgr Project A Staff Staff

Mgr Project B Staff Staff

Proj. Coordination
Tsegabrhan Mekonen (PhD) 19
Matrix Organization Structure

Tsegabrhan Mekonen (PhD) 20


Cont’d….

Strong Matrix Org Structure


Characteristics
Project Mgr’s Authority Moderate to High

Resource Availability Moderate to High

Who controls project budget Project Manager

Project Mgr’s Role Full-time

Project Mgr Admin Staff Full-time


Tsegabrhan Mekonen (PhD) 21
Project Organization: Matrix Form

• Advantages • Disadvantages
1. Efficient 1. No unity of command
2. Flexible/Reasonable 2. Dysfunctional Conflict/
access to staff Infighting
3. Strong Project Focus 3. Stressful/A tough job to
balance all project at the
4. Easier Post-Project
HQ
Transition/No problem
of “life after project” 4. This may slow the decision
making process

Tsegabrhan Mekonen (PhD) 22


Different Matrix Forms

• Weak Form
– The authority of the functional manager
predominates and the project manager has indirect
authority.
• Balanced Form
– The project manager sets the overall plan and the
functional manager determines how work to be
done.
• Strong Form
– The project manager has broader control and
functional departments act as subcontractors to the
project. Tsegabrhan Mekonen (PhD) 23
Cont’d….
Matrix Project organization/Weak

CEO

Functional Functional Functional


Manager Manager Manager

Staff Staff Staff

Staff Staff Staff

Staff Staff Staff

(Circled boxes represent staff engaged in project activities.)

Tsegabrhan Mekonen (PhD) 24


Cont’d….

Weak Matrix Org Structure


Characteristics

Project Mgr’s Authority Limited

Resource Availability Limited

Who controls project budget Functional Manager

Project Mgr’s Role Part-time

Project Mgr Admin Staff Part-time


Tsegabrhan Mekonen (PhD) 25
Cont’d….
Matrix Project organization/Balanced

CEO

Engineering Dept HR Dept Finance Dept

Project manager Staff Staff

Project manager Staff Staff

Proj. Coordination
Tsegabrhan Mekonen (PhD) 26
Cont’d….

Balanced Matrix Org Structure


Characteristics

Project Mgr’s Authority Low to Moderate

Resource Availability Low to Moderate

Who controls project budget Mixed

Project Mgr’s Role Full-time

Project Mgr Admin Staff Part-time


Tsegabrhan Mekonen (PhD) 27
Description Weak Matrix Balanced Matrix Strong Matrix
PM Title Project coordinator, PM PM
or
project leader
PM focus Split focus between Projects and Projects and
project and project work project work
functional
responsibilities
PM Power Minimal authority Balance of authority Significant authority
and power and power and power
PM Time Part-time on Full-time on projects Full-time on projects
projects
Org. Style Most like functional Blend of both weak & Most like a
strong matrix projectized
organization
PM report Functional manager A functional manager, Manager of project
to but shares authority managers
Tsegabrhan Mekonen (PhD) 28
and power
Cont’d….
Mixed Project organization

– A mix of both Functional & Pure is the usual


practice in project organization

• “Matrix management works, but it sure is difficult at times.


All matrix managers must keep up their health and take
Stress-Tabs. —A Project Manager” (Larson and Gray, 2011:
65)

Tsegabrhan Mekonen (PhD) 29


Choosing the Appropriate Project Management
Structure
• Organization (Form) Considerations
– How important is the project to the firm’s
success?
– What percentage of core work involves projects?
– What level of resources (human and physical)
are available?

Tsegabrhan Mekonen (PhD) 30


Choosing the Appropriate Project Management Structure
(cont’d)
• Project Considerations
– Size of project
– Strategic importance
– Novelty and need for innovation
– Need for integration (number of departments
involved)
– Environmental complexity (number of external
interfaces)
– Budget and time constraints
– Stability of resource requirements
Tsegabrhan Mekonen (PhD) 31
Organizational Culture
• Organizational Culture Defined
– A system of shared norms, beliefs, values, and
assumptions which bind people together,
thereby creating shared meanings.
– The “personality” of the organization that sets
it
apart from other organizations.
• Provides a sense of identify to its members.
• Helps legitimize the management system of the
organization.
• Clarifies and reinforces standards of behavior.
Tsegabrhan Mekonen (PhD) 32
Identifying Cultural Characteristics

• Study the physical characteristics


of an organization.
• Read about the organization.
• Observe how people interact
within the organization.
• Interpret stories and folklore
surrounding the organization.

Tsegabrhan Mekonen (PhD) 33


Organizational Culture Diagnosis Worksheet

Power Corp. (extracted from Gray and Larson (2017)


I. Physical Characteristics:
Architecture, office layout, décor, attire
Corporate HQ is 20 Story modern building—president on top floor.
Offices are bigger in the top floors than lower floors. Formal business
attire (white shirts, ties, power suits, . . . ) Power appears to increase
the higher up you are.
II. Public Documents:
Annual reports, internal newsletters, vision statements
At the heart of the Power Corp. Way is our vision . . . to be the global
energy company most admired for its people, partnership and
performance. Integrity. We are honest with others and ourselves. We
meet the highest ethical standards in all business dealings. We do
what we say we will do. Tsegabrhan Mekonen (PhD) 34
Organizational Culture Diagnosis Worksheet (Cont’d)
III. Behavior:
Pace, language, meetings, issues discussed, decision-making style,
communication patterns, rituals
Hierarchical decision-making, pace brisk but orderly, meetings start on time
and end on time, subordinates choose their words very carefully when
talking to superiors, people rarely work past 6:00 P.M., president takes top
performing unit on a boat cruise each year . . .
IV. Folklore:
Stories, anecdotes, heroines, heroes, villains
Young project manager was fired after going over his boss’s head to ask for
additional funds.
Stephanie C. considered a hero for taking complete responsibility for a
technical error.
Jack S. was labeled a traitor for joining chief competitor after working for
Power Corp. for 15 years.
Tsegabrhan Mekonen (PhD) 35
Implications of Organizational Culture for Organizing Projects

• Challenges for Project Managers in Navigating


Organizational Cultures
– Interacting with the culture and subcultures
of the parent organization
– Interacting with the project’s clients or customer
organizations
– Interacting with other organizations connected to the
project

Tsegabrhan Mekonen (PhD) 36


Key Dimensions Defining an Organization’s Culture

Tsegabrhan Mekonen (PhD) 37


Cultural Dimensions of an Organization Supportive
of Project Management

Tsegabrhan Mekonen (PhD) 38

You might also like