Professional Documents
Culture Documents
This vignette makes one essential point: the quality of evidence is more
important than the quantity of evidence. In fact, low quality cannot be compensated
for by high quantity. Confirmations are used to illustrate this point and can be
discussed here. Other types of evidence can also be discussed: e.g., internal vs.
external documentation and the value of client representations.
Examine the summary of the audit process in Figure 13-9 (page 424) to
review how tests of controls and substantive tests of transactions (Chapter
14) and audit sampling for tests of controls and substantive tests of
transactions (Chapter 15) tie into Chapter 16. It is also useful to do the
same with Figure 13-7 (page 417).
16-1
Identify client business risks
Set tolerable misstatement and assess inherent risk
Assess control risk – We use Figure 16-2 (page 523) to describe the
relationship between transaction-related and balance related audit
objectives for the sales and collection cycle
We ask students to identify the physical starting point for performing tests of the
year-end balance in accounts receivable and explain why the aged trial balance is
the logical starting point. It is important that students know what an aged trial
balance looks like (Figure 16-3, page 527), and where it comes from. T-14-1 is
useful to show where the aged trial balance fits into the accounting system.
(See Figure 16-3)
(See T-14-1)
The balance-related audit objectives first developed in Chapter 6 should be
reviewed at this point. Our emphasis is on why there are objectives (types of
misstatements), why they are different from transaction-related audit objectives, and
how they are used.
T-16-1 summarizes balance-related audit objectives and T-16-2 compares balance-
related audit objectives to transaction-related audit objectives.
(See T-16-1 and T-16-2)
Next, we require students to close their books and go over the balance-related
audit objectives on T-16-3.
(See T-16-3)
We require students to do the following in class:
16-2
16-3
Our experience is that they need a lot of guidance in doing this, and it is
somewhat time-consuming, but productive. We believe that two objectives deserve
special attention:
(See T-16-4)
Problems 16-23, 16-24 and 16-26 are excellent reviews of accounts receivable
balance-related audit objectives. Problem 16-25 is useful to help students distinguish
among tests of controls, substantive tests of transactions, analytical procedures, and
tests of details of balances.
(See T-16-5)
Multiple Choice Question 16-21 and Problem 16-33 (alternative procedures) are also
useful at this point. Problem 16-31 can be used to illustrate timing differences and
other errors and differences that an auditor may need to resolve when using
balance confirmations.
16-4
Developing Tests of Details Audit Program (page 538)
We use the Hillsburg Hardware Co. to illustrate how auditors develop detailed
audit program steps for tests of details. Refer students especially to Table 16-4
(page 540) and Table 16-5 (page 541) and remind them:
Figure 16-7 (page 539) is useful for understanding the decision process
that the in-charge auditor followed.
The procedures were developed from a unique set of facts (see Figure 16-
7). If the facts change, the procedures are likely to change.
The sample size and items to select are included in the audit program.
They were decided on a judgment basis considering the relevant factors in
the engagement.
Notice that confirmation (Procedure 10 in Table 16-5) is used to satisfy
multiple objectives.
The procedures in Table 16-5 are those in Table 16-4 (design format) converted to
a performance format. We trace one or two procedures in class from Table 16-4 to
Table 16-5 to make sure that students understand how this is done. The reasons for
the differences between a design and a performance format should be emphasized.
Review
Any of Problems 16-23, 16-24, 16-25, or 16-26 are useful to review types of
tests and balance-related audit objectives. Problem 16-32 is useful for practice in
developing an audit program. Case 16-34 is especially useful for identifying audit
risks and summarizing the trade-off between tests of controls, substantive tests of
transactions, analytical procedures, and tests of details of balances. Problem 16-36
can be used to illustrate the performance of selected procedures using ACL.
If you used the Pinnacle Manufacturing Case in earlier chapters, it is important
that you finish it by using Case 16-35, which is the final part.
16-5
CHAPTER 16
CROSS-REFERENCE OF LEARNING OBJECTIVES AND PROBLEM MATERIAL
Multiple Discussion
Review Choice Questions ACL Problem
Learning Objectives Questions Questions and Problems and Cases
16-1 Describe the methodology for designing tests of 16-1, 16-2, 16-34
details of balances using the audit risk model. 16-17
16-2 Design and perform analytical procedures for 16-3 16-20 16-29, 16-32 16-35
accounts in the sales and collection cycle.
16-5
16-3 Design and perform tests of details of balances for 16-4, 16-5, 16-22 16-23, 16-24, 16-34, 16-35,
accounts receivable. 16-6, 16-7, 16-25, 16-26, 16-36
16-8, 16-18, 16-27, 16-29,
16-19 16-32
16-4 Obtain and evaluate accounts receivable 16-9, 16-10, 16-21 16-28, 16-30, 16-34, 16-35
confirmations. 16-11, 16-12, 16-31, 16-32,
16-13, 16-14, 16-33
16-15, 16-16
16-5 Design audit procedures for the audit of accounts 16-32 16-34
receivable, using an evidence planning worksheet
as a guide.
BALANCE-RELATED AUDIT OBJECTIVES
T-16-1
COMPARISON OF
TRANSACTION-RELATED AUDIT OBJECTIVES
AND BALANCE-RELATED AUDIT OBJECTIVES
TRANSACTION-RELATED BALANCE-RELATED
AUDIT OBJECTIVES AUDIT OBJECTIVES
Transactions are properly Details in the trial balance agree
included in the master file and with related master file
are correctly summarized. amounts, foot to the total in the
trial balance, and agree to the
total in the general ledger.
Recorded transactions exist. Amounts in the trial balance
exist.
Existing transactions are Existing amounts are included
recorded. in the trial balance.
Transactions are accurately Amounts in the trial balance are
stated. accurate.
Transactions are properly Amounts in the trial balance are
classified. properly classified.
Transactions are recorded on Transactions near the balance
the correct dates. sheet date are recorded in the
proper period.
Not applicable. Amounts in the trial balance are
stated at realizable value.
Not applicable. The client has rights to assets in
the trial balance.
T-16-2
BALANCE-RELATED AUDIT OBJECTIVES
FOR TESTS OF DETAILS OF BALANCES
Detail tie-in
Existence
Completeness
Accuracy
Classification
Cutoff
Realizable value
Rights
T-16-3
SALES CUTOFF
REQUIRED:
T-16-4
CHARACTERISTICS OF A CONFIRMATION
1. Receipt
4. Requested by auditor
QUESTION:
T-16-5