Professional Documents
Culture Documents
4
ISSN 1974-9821 August 2013
Abstract – In this study, Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) approach was proposed to
analyze the flow in the centrifugal pump impeller using the SolidWorks Flow Simulation (SWFS).
Impeller is designed for the head (H) 24 m; discharge (Q) 1.583 L/s; and speed (N) 2880 rpm.
Impeller vane profile was generated by circular arc method and point by point method and CFD
analysis was performed for the impeller vane profile. Further the impeller is analyzed for both
forward and backward curved vane. The internal flow simulation was solved by Navier-Stokes
equations with modified K- ε turbulence model in the impeller. Velocity and pressure distribution
were analyzed for the modified impellers. As the result, impeller with backward curved circular
arc vane showed good agreement. Copyright © 2013 Praise Worthy Prize S.r.l. - All rights
reserved.
Nomenclature I. Introduction
, m ⁄s Volume flow rate Centrifugal pumps are very common equipment used
,m Head in residence, agriculture and industrial applications. It is
N, rpm Speed essential for a pump manufactured at low cost and
, rps Angular velocity consuming less power with high efficiency. The overall
, Total pressure performance is based on the impeller parameters and it is
fluid density essential to identify the optimized design parameter of
turbulence energy the impeller.
dissipation rate of turbulence energy CFD helps the designer to identify the optimal
fluid viscosity parameters of the impeller by numerical flow simulation.
fluid turbulent viscosity The impeller is virtually analyzed using CFD software
ij-th component of the laminar stress tensor package SWFS. The aim of the present paper is to
i-th component of the fluid velocity vector analyze the performance of impeller by developing the
ij-th component of the Reynolds stress tensor vane profile by circular arc method and point by point
method and perform CFD analysis of the impeller vane
i-th component of the Cartesian coordinate
profile for forward and backward curved vane shown in
system
Fig. 1.
i-th component of the normal-to-the-wall in
A numerical approach was performed using CFD to
the fluid region
examine the characteristics of static torque and extracted
distance from the wall along the normal to it
power of turbine in a free stream with various
dimensionless distance from the wall along the
hydrodynamic flow conditions [1].
normal to it
Computational investigation of water turbine based on
boundary layer thickness calculated by the
three-dimensional numerical flow were calculated and
integral method
analyzed for a specific flow speed discussed by Wang et
Wall shear stress
al., [2]. Shojaeefard et al., carried out experimental study
Cm, m/s Meridional component of absolute velocity
for performance improvement of centrifugal pump by
Cu, m/s Peripheral component of absolute velocity
modifying the geometric characteristics using CFD for
K m2 Capacity constant at point, viscous fluid [3].
CFD analysis was performed on the unsteady flow
Subscripts behavior near the tongue region of a centrifugal pump for
three-dimensional unsteady flow regarding grid size,
1, 2 Inlet and outlet
time step size and turbulence model [4].
i, j, k directions of the Cartesian coordinate system
The performance of the pump is numerically
w at the wall
optimized on a two-dimensional centrifugal pump
impeller to find the impeller geometry for maximizing
the pump efficiency by varying the design variables of
Manuscript received and revised July 2013, accepted August 2013 Copyright © 2013 Praise Worthy Prize S.r.l. - All rights reserved
1327
R. Ragoth Singh, M. Nataraj, S. Surendar, M. Siva
blade angles at the leading and the trailing edge [5]. A II.2. Vane Profile
methodology for optimizing the impeller geometry using
Three methods of constructing the vane profile are
CFD and Response Surface Method were discussed [6].
circular arc method, point by point method and
Numerical investigation using k - ε turbulence model in
conformal representation method. In this paper, two
the water turbine as discussed elsewhere [1], [2], [7].
methods (circular arc method and point by point method)
A detailed investigation of internal flow in a
are considered for developing the vane profile.
centrifugal pump impeller with six twisted blades using a
Table I lists the main geometric parameters to model
three - dimensional Navier-Stokes code with a standard k
the forward and backward curved vane by circular arc
- ε two-equation turbulence model were done by Cheah
method and point by point method.
et al., [8]. A detailed flow investigation were made with a
laser Doppler velocimeter in a centrifugal pump TABLE I
equipped with a vaned diffuser were carried out at PARAMETERS OF IMPELLER
different operating points for different rotor–stator Parameter Dimension
relative positions [9]. Head 24 m
Mixed flow pump was analyzed using a coarse grid in Discharge 1.583 L/s
Speed 2880 rpm
the impeller using a commercial CFD code (FLOTRAN) Outer Diameter of impeller 144 mm
with 3-D Reynolds Averaged Navier Stokes equations in Inner Diameter of impeller 36 mm
a rotating cylindrical coordinate system and standard k - Inlet blade angle 19.25o
ε turbulence model was used to solve the analysis [10]. Blade angle at outlet 23.76o
Impeller width at inlet 10 mm
The performance of a centrifugal pump was analyzed Number of blades 4
using CFD and response surface methodology by
modifying impeller design specifications at the best
efficiency point [11]. II.3. Circular Arc Method
The impeller is arbitrarily divided into a number of
Specification of Pump concentric rings between r1 and r2. The radius of arc ,
between any two rings rb and ra is obtained from the
relationship (1).
Design calculation
The computations of the values of for various rings
and the radii of ar of the vane are shown in Table II and
Fig. 2:
Vane profile devlopment
−
= (1)
Modeling using Solid Works 2( − )
Copyright © 2013 Praise Worthy Prize S.r.l. - All rights reserved International Review on Modelling and Simulations, Vol. 6, N. 4
1328
R. Ragoth Singh, M. Nataraj, S. Surendar, M. Siva
The values of the vane profile coordinates and the SWFS software is a powerful CFD tool that enables
vane profile are shown in Table III and Fig. 3: designers to quickly and easily simulate fluid flow for the
success of designs.
Design cycles are expensive and time-consuming.
∙ = (2) CFD analysis is able to help the designers to optimize the
designs by simulating several concepts and scenarios to
make absolute assessment. SWFS solves time-dependent
180 three-dimensional Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes
= (3)
∙ equations using the k - ε turbulence model with the Finite
Volume Method (FVM).
TABLE II
CO ORDINATES OF VANE PROFILE DEVELOPMENT – CIRCULAR ARC METHOD
rbcos βb-
Ring r r2 β cosβ r cos β rb2– ra2
racos βa
1 18 324 19.25 0.9440 16.993 - - -
X 31.5 992.75 20.377 0.9374 29.528 12.535 668.25 26.65
Y 45 2025 21.505 0.9303 41.867 12.338 1032.75 41.85
Z 58.5 3422.25 22.6325 0.9229 53.994 12.1279 1397.25 57.60
2 72 5184 23.76 0.9152 65.897 11.9074 1761.75 74.008
TABLE III
COORDINATES OF VANE PROFILE DEVELOPMENT – POINT BY POINT METHOD
θ
S.No r Cm b w δ t sin ß ß B ∆r x ∆
Degrees
1 18 1.44 32 5.45 0.263 5 28.27 0.176 0.440 26.14 113.18 0.009 99.94 0.899 0
2 27 1.39 28.33 5.062 0.274 5 42.41 0.117 0.392 23.13 86.69 0.009 77.52 0.697 51.53
3 36 1.34 24.66 4.666 0.288 5 56.54 0.088 0.376 22.11 68.35 0.009 61.70 0.555 91.51
4 45 1.29 21 4.269 0.303 5 70.68 0.070 0.374 21.98 55.05 0.009 49.98 0.449 123.33
5 54 1.24 17.33 3.873 0.322 5 84.82 0.058 0.381 22.40 44.91 0.009 40.87 0.367 149.10
6 63 1.20 13.66 3.476 0.345 5 98.96 0.050 0.395 23.30 36.83 0.009 33.50 0.301 170.18
7 72 1.15 10 3.08 0.374 5 113.09 0.044 0.418 24.72 30.16 - - - 187.46
TABLE IV
MESH DETAILS
CAFC CABC PPFC PPBC
Total cells 46391 46391 40651 40651
Fluid cells 6959 6980 14457 14469
Solid cells 24264 24264 10084 10084
Partial cells 15168 15147 16110 16098
Copyright © 2013 Praise Worthy Prize S.r.l. - All rights reserved International Review on Modelling and Simulations, Vol. 6, N. 4
1329
R. Ragoth Singh, M. Nataraj, S. Surendar, M. Siva
2 1
= + − ; = −
Mass Continuity: + ∇∙( )=0 (4) 3
= ∙ (9)
.
20.5
= (1 − ) · 1+ (10)
where:
√
= ; =
Copyright © 2013 Praise Worthy Prize S.r.l. - All rights reserved International Review on Modelling and Simulations, Vol. 6, N. 4
1330
R. Ragoth Singh, M. Nataraj, S. Surendar, M. Siva
Copyright © 2013 Praise Worthy Prize S.r.l. - All rights reserved International Review on Modelling and Simulations, Vol. 6, N. 4
1331
R. Ragoth Singh, M. Nataraj, S. Surendar,
Surendar M. Siva
Copyright © 2013 Praise Worthy Prize S.r.l. - All rights reserved International Review on Modelli
Modelling
ng and Simulations, Vol. 6, N. 4
1332
R. Ragoth Singh, M. Nataraj, S. Surendar, M. Siva
Copyright © 2013 Praise Worthy Prize S.r.l. - All rights reserved International Review on Modelling and Simulations, Vol. 6, N. 4
1333