You are on page 1of 17

Chart title

Source dataset
Dataset metadata and download
List of available indicators
Extraction date
Enterprises employing ICT specialists | Year:2019
European Commission, Digital Scoreboard
https://digital-agenda-data.eu/datasets/digital_agenda_scoreboard_key_indicators/#download
https://digital-agenda-data.eu/datasets/digital_agenda_scoreboard_key_indicators/indicators
2020-05-19
FILTER NOTATION
Indicator group ict-specialist
Indicator e_itsp2
Breakdown ent_all_xfin
Unit of measure pc_ent
Country AT
BE
BG
HR
CY
CZ
DK
EE
FI
FR
DE
EL
HU
IE
IT
LV
LT
NL
NO
PL
PT
RO
SK
SI
ES
SE
UK
Time period 2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
2012
LABEL
ICT Specialist
Enterprises employing ICT specialists
All enterprises, without financial sector (10 persons employed or more)
Percentage of enterprises
Austria
Belgium
Bulgaria
Croatia
Cyprus
Czechia
Denmark
Estonia
Finland
France
Germany
Greece
Hungary
Ireland
Italy
Latvia
Lithuania
Netherlands
Norway
Poland
Portugal
Romania
Slovakia
Slovenia
Spain
Sweden
United Kingdom
Year:2019
Year:2018
Year:2017
Year:2016
Year:2015
Year:2014
Year:2012
DEFINITION

ICT specialists are employees for whom ICT is the main job. For example,
to develop,
Since 2010: operate or maintain
10_C10_S951_XK, ICT systems
2009: or applications.
10_C10_N82_XK, until 2008:
10_dfghiko
Enterprises with 10 or more persons employed. All manufacturing and
service sectors, excluding the financial sector. Breaks in series because
SOURCE

Eurostat, Table isoc_ci_eu_en2: Computers and the internet: enterprises


- summary of EU aggregates (NACE Rev. 2 activity)
SERIES CATEGORY
2012 Greece
2012 Finland
2012 Ireland
2012 Austria
2012 Norway
2012 United Kingdom
2012 Hungary
2012 Czechia
2012 Portugal
2012 Belgium
2012 Denmark
2012 Netherlands
2012 Slovakia
2012 Cyprus
2012 Latvia
2012 Spain
2012 Sweden
2012 Lithuania
2012 Germany
2012 Slovenia
2012 Croatia
2012 Estonia
2012 France
2012 Poland
2012 Italy
2012 Bulgaria
2012 Romania
2014 Finland
2014 Ireland
2014 Netherlands
2014 Denmark
2014 Hungary
2014 Belgium
2014 Cyprus
2014 Spain
2014 Greece
2014 United Kingdom
2014 Austria
2014 Germany
2014 Bulgaria
2014 Latvia
2014 Czechia
2014 Sweden
2014 Croatia
2014 Norway
2014 Slovenia
2014 Portugal
2014 Slovakia
2014 Lithuania
2014 Estonia
2014 Italy
2014 France
2014 Romania
2014 Poland
2015 Ireland
2015 Belgium
2015 Netherlands
2015 Greece
2015 Cyprus
2015 Hungary
2015 Spain
2015 Finland
2015 Denmark
2015 Austria
2015 Croatia
2015 United Kingdom
2015 Germany
2015 Bulgaria
2015 Slovenia
2015 Portugal
2015 Slovakia
2015 Sweden
2015 Czechia
2015 Norway
2015 Latvia
2015 Italy
2015 France
2015 Lithuania
2015 Estonia
2015 Romania
2015 Poland
2016 Ireland
2016 Greece
2016 Netherlands
2016 Hungary
2016 Belgium
2016 Denmark
2016 Spain
2016 Austria
2016 Cyprus
2016 Finland
2016 United Kingdom
2016 Germany
2016 Slovenia
2016 Slovakia
2016 Bulgaria
2016 Czechia
2016 Portugal
2016 Norway
2016 Sweden
2016 Latvia
2016 Croatia
2016 Italy
2016 France
2016 Lithuania
2016 Estonia
2016 Poland
2016 Romania
2017 Ireland
2017 Belgium
2017 Hungary
2017 Netherlands
2017 Finland
2017 Cyprus
2017 Denmark
2017 Austria
2017 United Kingdom
2017 Spain
2017 Czechia
2017 Greece
2017 Sweden
2017 Croatia
2017 Portugal
2017 Slovakia
2017 Bulgaria
2017 Slovenia
2017 Germany
2017 Norway
2017 Lithuania
2017 France
2017 Italy
2017 Estonia
2017 Latvia
2017 Poland
2017 Romania
2018 Ireland
2018 Belgium
2018 Denmark
2018 Netherlands
2018 Hungary
2018 Finland
2018 United Kingdom
2018 Cyprus
2018 Greece
2018 Slovenia
2018 Austria
2018 Croatia
2018 Germany
2018 Bulgaria
2018 Czechia
2018 Sweden
2018 Portugal
2018 Norway
2018 Spain
2018 Slovakia
2018 Lithuania
2018 France
2018 Italy
2018 Latvia
2018 Estonia
2018 Poland
2018 Romania
2019 Ireland
2019 Denmark
2019 Belgium
2019 United Kingdom
2019 Hungary
2019 Finland
2019 Netherlands
2019 Poland
2019 Cyprus
2019 Greece
2019 Portugal
2019 Czechia
2019 Latvia
2019 Bulgaria
2019 Austria
2019 Croatia
2019 Germany
2019 Norway
2019 Sweden
2019 Slovenia
2019 Slovakia
2019 France
2019 Spain
2019 Italy
2019 Lithuania
2019 Estonia
2019 Romania
CODE VALUE NOTE
EL 34.7258
FI 32.9275
IE 32.048
AT 31.448
NO 30.7219
UK 30.2345
HU 29.8946
CZ 29.198
PT 28.7714
BE 27.8775
DK 26.7298
NL 25.5243
SK 24.6663
CY 24.2698
LV 22.8138
ES 22.4254
SE 22.2868
LT 22.0049
DE 21.2813
SI 20.8199
HR 20.7593
EE 17.7086
FR 14.974
PL 14.2054
IT 14.1038
BG 13.318
RO 3.9962
FI 28.4745
IE 27.859
NL 26.9244
DK 26.7775
HU 26.6107
BE 26.1459
CY 24.8049
ES 24.5362
EL 24.2698
UK 24.2677
AT 23.6285
DE 22.2941
BG 20.9973
LV 20.7104
CZ 20.5141
SE 20.1875
HR 19.8478
NO 19.6347
SI 19.5605
PT 19.0809
SK 18.4287
LT 16.0003
EE 15.3804
IT 15.1678
FR 14.7027
RO 11.6789
PL 10.2153
IE 30.479
BE 28.2485
NL 28.1152
EL 26.3858
CY 26.2027
HU 25.5261
ES 25.2736
FI 24.9677
DK 24.4901
AT 23.8653
HR 22.2817
UK 22.2195
DE 21.3653
BG 20.4495
SI 19.7989
PT 19.7851
SK 19.4539
SE 19.3932
CZ 19.3016
NO 18.9831
LV 18.7955
IT 16.6786
FR 16.1988
LT 15.0101
EE 14.6413
RO 12.9132
PL 12.0159
IE 35.2742
EL 29.6475
NL 26.2683
HU 25.8241
BE 25.7038
DK 25.4959
ES 25.1728
AT 24.8102
CY 24.6009
FI 24.3521
UK 23.4758
DE 22.2322
SI 19.9971
SK 19.9788
BG 19.8634
CZ 19.4127
PT 18.9963
NO 18.854
SE 17.6902
LV 17.3831
HR 17.1871
IT 16.8348
FR 15.5446
LT 15.4345
EE 14.7364
PL 12.4728
RO 11.2432
IE 32.9395
BE 29.4011
HU 27.294
NL 26.8432
FI 25.956
CY 24.7908
DK 24.4824
AT 23.2613
UK 22.171
ES 21.002
CZ 20.5097
EL 20.4586
SE 20.3233 Results on cloud computing and
HR 20.0435 invoices not comparable as
PT 19.7976 u-flag when STE >2 pp for overall
SK 19.6499 proportions and 5 pp for
BG 19.2111
SI 19.0903
DE 18.9562
NO 18.5919
LT 18.1368
FR 17.2183
IT 16.1808
EE 14.9812
LV 13.5162
PL 12.2811
RO 9.87628
IE 32.3713
BE 28.2265
DK 27.8108
NL 27.3511
HU 26.2116
FI 25.6752
UK 24.3846
CY 22.8319
EL 21.9655
SI 20.3898
AT 20.193 Rounding differences occur. Due to
HR 20.153 item non-response
All aggregates fornumber
where nearly all
of
DE 20.0526 respondents was 3 or lower were
BG 19.7515
CZ 19.4655
SE 19.0768
PT 18.6051 Due to rounding, totals may not
NO 18.4997 correspond exactly to the sum of
ES 18.0352
SK 17.555
LT 17.0491
FR 17.0082
IT 16.1449
LV 15.4844
EE 13.4372
PL 13.233
RO 11.3402
IE 31.5443
DK 29.5615
BE 27.9644
UK 27.1238
HU 25.9865
FI 25.6023
NL 25.5835
PL 23.4894 high increase due to additional
CY 23.1343 validation with item E3a
EL 21.6416
PT 21.1625 Due to rounding, totals may not
CZ 20.451 correspond exactly to the sum of
LV 20.1084
BG 20.0825
AT 19.8026 Rounding differences occur. Due to
HR 19.2225 item non-response
All aggregates fornumber
where nearly all
of
DE 19.047 respondents was lower than 3 were
NO 18.8934
SE 18.2701 Not all questions asked from micro
SI 17.9992 enterprises@"Examples on type of
SK 17.7247
FR 17.4412
ES 16.6869
IT 15.9697
LT 15.2499
EE 14.8101
RO 10.4615
FLAG

You might also like