Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CHAPTER 2" T H E R M O G R A V I M E T R Y
2.1 Introduction
N
-i
"r r ~ _
m
w
Zr
W
0
0
7
i;i w
Z
R
o
w Lu o
"r N ILl ,--
F-
o
0
I-- Z
_
o~ " " .....
I
R
_-J
Q~
c56
B
| i
- - ,., = ...... - . . . . . . . . . .
I IHrdl3M % i
64
2.2,2 The isQ~hermal thermal stability determination.
Isothermal mass/time curves of n o n - s t a b i l i s e d PP powder
samples were measured during I000 minutes at temperatures
b e t w e e n 160~ and 280~ The PP TGA samples (about I0 mg.)
were flushed with nitrogen during one hour at 30~ before the
experiment was started.
g9. 8 99. 8
T(lsot, h.) - t68~
. . . . . l ~z
99. 7
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . -- . . . . . . - - _ _ _ _ _ L
r- r-
---~ U
~: 99,4 t3 99. 4
T(t=oth.) - 228~
9g. 3 -
, %
99. 3
99. ~ 4 - 99.2
99. ] - - 99.1
98, 9 - - 98.9
I . . . . . I I ...... 1 I I i '1 ' 1 1
0.0 100. 0 200. 0 300. 0 400. 0 500. 0 600. 0 700. 0 800. 0 900. 0 1000. 0
Time (minutes)
Figure 2.2
Isothermal TGA mass/temperature curves of a PP powder sample (non-stabilised)
66
Table 2.1 R e s u l t s of i s o t h e r m a l T G A e x p e r i m e n t s on
n o n - s t a b i l i s e d PP p o w d e r s a m p l e s
~,..~[_ ,, . . . . .
222 0.423 .
9.0E-7
242
, =
0.534 7.8E-7
250 0.425 1.5E-6 ,, ,,
,
270 0.496 1.6E-5
277 m 0.412 3.3E-5
9 7
67
Figure 2.3
Oligomer content/temperature relation
(nonstabilised powder/stabilised nibs)
+ non- ~ stab.
stab. mibs
0.80
-I-
0.70
+
0.60
J
A J
0.50 J A
c
0
-I-
J
o
E
JA A
0
0.40 J A
0
J
-t-
0.30 J
_r
A
0.20 I _ _ I I I I
Figure 2.4
The thermal degradation loss rate of PP as a function of 1000/T
+ non- ~ stab.
stab. n/bs,
0.00001 +
+ +
U')
o
le-06
5e-Q7 I I I I I I I
gg. 5 - 99. 5
PP N I B S A M P L E
stabilised
gg. 0 - 99. 0
98.5 - 98. 5
97.5 - gT. 5
PP P O W D E R S A M P L E
non.stabilised
97.0 - 97.0
T i m e (minutes)
96.5 - g6. 5
0.0 500. 0 1000. 0 1500. 0 2000. 0 2500. 0 3000. 0 3500. 0 4000. 0
Figure 2.5
The mass/time curves of a non-stabilised and a stabilised PP sample during
isothermal TGA experiments at 250~ (nitrogen atm.)
PERKIN-ELMER 7 Series Thermal Analysis System
100.0 - '. . . . .
i,i i ,, , ,,,,,,,/,, ,,, ,,, , ,,,,,, , ,, , , , ,', , , , , | i
99.8 -
o~ 9 9 . 2 -
9g.o-
,,,3
.,m,
QI
N 9a.a-
nitrogenatmosphere
TEMP 1: 30.0~ TIME 1: 0 . 0 m i n RATE 1: 0.1~
98.6 - TEMP 2: 450.0~
98.4 -
98. 2 -
184[~ 2@41~ /
98.0 -
, , . . . . . t . . . . ~ I .... ~ ' ' -I ............ I 'I ' "
50.0 75. o ~oo. o ~25. o ~5o. o ~75. o 2oo. o 225.o 250. o 27~.o 3oo. o
Figure 2.6 Temperature(~
PP TGA experiment. Heating rate 0.1~
72
The TGA sample pan was filled with about I0 mg. of catalyst
sample and placed in a closed, n i t r o g e n flushed, small bottle.
This happened in the dry-box used to store the catalyst. The
TGA sample pan was transported in this bottle to the TGA
sample loading table. The whole TGA balance system was packed,
subsequently, in a big p o l y e t h y l e n e bag (Sigma A3533 Atmosbag
36" x 51" x 58", provided with two gloves) This bag was
closed as good as possible around the electrical cables and
blown up with an excess of nitrogen. The relative humidity in
the bag decreased in about one hour from 50 - 70 % to less
than 5 % due to this nitrogen purge. The catalyst sample was
then, using the gloves of the Atmosbag, taken out of the
bottle and placed in the TGA hang-up wire. Subsequently, the
TGA furnace was closed and the m e a s u r e m e n t was started.
go. 0
85.0
65.0 -
60. 0 -
References
95, 0 9-0, I
go. 0 "-0. 2
85. 0
I
/
#
"-0. 3
8o.o //
I !
"-0. 4
--
J::
75.0-
/I
"-0. 5
.,,..
(9
.,,1
7o.o- -0. 6 U1
65, 0 - -0~ 7
k
60. 0 -0. 8
55, 0 -
1
528~ -0. 9
234~
50, 0 -1.0
........ ~. . . . . . . . . . . . I ......... I ..... I i . . . . . . i ....... t
I00. 0 200.0 300. 0 400. 0 500. 0 600, 0 700, 0
I
-0. 2 -0. 2
\ \
i/ |
' / .J
-0, 3 | -0. 3
.c_ -0. 4
E
o~
t
/ \., ;
[
I
"-~ -0. 5
/
t -0. 5
ID
I
~ -0. 6
.~_
L_
E3 - 0 . 7
I
ri 390~
15.BY. T I C I 4
-0, 6
-0. 7 ,..3
! 28. B~. DIBP
-0.8
f I
-0. B
4.BX T t C I 4
-0. 9
-1.0
i 9 2 2 . 5 ~ DIBP
-0. g
.0
-1.1
i
!
5aeoc -1.1