Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Y, xxxx 1
R. Girish Kumar
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
R.V. College of Engineering,
Bengaluru, India
Email: girishkumarr@rvce.edu.in
N.S. Narahari
Department of Industrial Engineering and Management,
R.V. College of Engineering,
Bengaluru, India
Email: naraharins@rvce.edu.in
K.M. Mithilesh
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
P.E.S. College of Engineering,
Bengaluru, India
Email: mithileshkm4554@gmail.com
Reference to this paper should be made as follows: Kumar, A., Kumar, R.G.,
Narahari, N.S. and Mithilesh, K.M. (xxxx) ‘Case study on identification and
elimination of waste through lean implementation in an automotive part
manufacturing industry’, Int. J. Lean Enterprise Research, Vol. X, No. Y,
pp.xxx–xxx.
1 Introduction
Lean manufacturing (LM) also known as Toyota Production System (TPS) has
influenced the manufacturing practices around the world. The concept of LM was
pioneered by a Japanese automotive company, Toyota, during 1950s. The primary goals
of TPS were to reduce the cost and to improve productivity by eliminating wastes
(Womack et al., 1990). Principles of lean are universal as they are broadly accepted by
many manufacturing operations and have been applied successfully across many
disciplines (Holweg, 2007).
Case study on identification and elimination of waste 3
2.1 Objectives
The main objective of this research was to develop a lean compliancy that can help a
manufacturing industry to eliminate waste, maintain better inventory control and to
obtain better overall financial and operational control. VSM is utilised to identify the
wastes in the crank shaft manufacturing line of the organisation and provide solutions to
reduce the throughput time of the process.
Investigation is the first step in VSM. A visit to the production line gives an opportunity
to record observations such as data regarding material flow information flow and
personnel flow. Data such as process detail, machine detail, cycle time, rejection rate,
etc., can be recorded.
BS06
BS05
CS03
CS02
CS01
Date:
Process
Rev. no.:
Process no.
Components
1
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Rough turning
1
3
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Finish turning
28-Dec-11
Crank pin bore drilling, face milling, boring and chamfering, flange
4
X
X
X
X
face milling
5
Case carburising
Square side facing, drilling, counter boring, chamfering, undercut,
6
square machining
Product family matrix
X
X
X
X
Thread rolling
8
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Component type:
X
10
X
X
X
Deburring
X
X
X
X
X
Tempering
Line 6
X
Shot blasting
Note: The component that shares maximum number of process with other components will represent the process family.
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
OD and face grinding
X
X
X
X
Crank pin bore, face grinding and chamfering
X
OD polishing
X
Stem face slot milling
X
Induction hardening (slot width)
X
X
X
Laser marking
X
X
X
X
X
X
Crack inspection and demagnetising
X
X
X
X
X
Stage inspection
X
Connecting rod and bearing assembly
X
Crank pin and plug assembly
X
X
Crank shaft assembly
X
X
Gear assembly
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Final inspection
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Packing
X
11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
Shipping
X 19
X 14
X 13
X 16
X 14
X 10
27
No. of process followed
Product family matrix for crank shaft components Table 1
5 Case study on identification and elimination of waste
6 A. Kumar et al.
The product family matrix created for this research is shown in Table 1. From Table 1, it
is clear that CS04 component shares the maximum number of processes among its
variants. Hence, further process of value stream shall be performed on this component.
CS04 is an assembled crank shaft component which consists of CS041 (left crank shaft)
and CS042 (right crank shaft) which are manufactured in crank shaft line. It also includes
other sub-assemblies like connecting rod, crank pin, gear, bearing and crank pin plug
which are purchased from the supplier.
Figure 1 Cycle times for all crank shaft processes (see online version for colours)
Figure 2 Current state map of crank shaft line with wastes identified (see online version
for colours)
Mapping starts with customer, placed in the upper right hand region of the map. The
customer schedule is communicated electronically through e-mail or portal schedule
which is represented by using electronic information icon.
The information is received by the supply chain department, represented by a
production control icon. The schedule processed by the supply chain department is
communicated to the supplier through e-mail. The procured material is moved to the
storage area, represented by a triangular shape inventory icon. The manufacturing
processes are represented using process boxes which are aligned from left to right. The
process box contains various data that were collected earlier. Small inventory icons are
placed between the operations which represents work in process (WIP) material between
those operations. Timeline is drawn under every process boxes to compile the production
throughput time.
The improvements for reducing/eliminating the wastes that were identified in the
previous section are provided using the principles of LM. Three improvements were
suggested, which work towards the reduction of throughput time and increasing the
productivity.
Planvisage helped to solve their supply chain problems by eliminating the supply
chain inefficiencies. It offers a SCM software suite which is scalable, cost-effective and
performs production planning, shop floor scheduling, demand planning, forecasting,
replenishment planning and production execution. This software also helps in generating
capacity and material plans based on JIT principle.
There was yet a problem in implementing the software inside the organisation.
Working on this, efforts were made towards full functionality of the software. Firstly,
rectification of errors in master data was undertaken. Later, monthly data containing
customer schedule and inventory were uploaded. After running the software, various
reports were generated. Procurement plan is one of the reports that provide all the details
regarding the order quantity and order date for child parts as well as raw materials. This
information will help in ordering material from supplier in the right time and right
quantity so that the material is available JIT for processing. This solution estimated the
reduction of non-value added time from 48.48 hrs to 12 hrs, which accounts a reduction
of 14.4% on throughput time.
Addition of laser marking machine on the line will drastically reduce the need to
transport the components to the sub-contractors and reduce the waiting time of the
component. This change will prevent the transportation of the components to other plant
for processing which adds up to approximately 2,000 m with queuing inventory of 200
and non-value added time of 8 hrs. Reduction of 48 hrs of non-value added time can be
achieved by implementing this solution which accounts to 14.2% reduction in throughput
time.
Figure 5 Future state map for crank shaft manufacturing (see online version for colours)
12 A. Kumar et al.
5 Conclusions
References
Abdulmalek, F.A. and Rajgopal, J. (2007) ‘Analysing the benefits of lean manufacturing and value
stream mapping via simulation: a process sector case study’, International Journal of
Production Economics, Vol. 107, pp.223–236. Comment [t4]: Author: Please provide the issue
Chen, L. and Meng, B. (2010) ‘The application of value stream mapping based lean production number.
system’, International Journal of Business and Management, Vol. 5, No. 6, pp.203–209.
Holweg, M. (2007) ‘The genealogy of lean production’, Journal of Operations Management,
Vol. 25, pp.420–437. Comment [t5]: Author: Please provide the issue
Kuhlang, P., Edtmayr, T. and Sihn, W. (2011) ‘Methodical approach to increase productivity and number.
reduce lead time in assembly and production-logistic processes’, CIRP Journal of
Manufacturing Science and Technology, Vol. 4, pp.24–32. Comment [t6]: Author: Please provide the issue
Nordin, N., Deros, B.M. and Wahab, D.A. (2010) ‘A survey on lean manufacturing implementation number.
in Malaysian automotive industry’, International Journal of Innovation, Management and
Technology, Vol. 1, No. 4, pp.374–380.
Case study on identification and elimination of waste 13
Puvanasvaran, P., Megat, H., Hong, T.S. and Razali, M. (2009) ‘The roles of communication
process for an effective lean manufacturing implementation’, Journal of Industrial Engg. and
Management, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp.128–152.
Rother, M. and Shook, J. (1999) Learning to See: Value Stream Mapping to Add Value and
Eliminate Muda, The Lean Enterprise Institute, Brookline, Massachusetts, USA.
Sakthidhasan, K. and Vendan, S.P. (2010) ‘Reduction of wastage in motor manufacturing industry’,
Jordan Journal of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Vol. 4, No. 5, pp.579–590.
Shabeena Begam, M., Syath Abuthakeer, S., Subha, M.V. and Paranitharan, K.P. (2011)
‘Redesigning an automotive assembly line through lean strategy’, Int. J. of Lean Thinking,
Vol. 2, No. 2. Comment [t7]: Author: Please provide the issue
Shah, R. and Ward, P.T. (2003) ‘Lean manufacturing: context, practice bundles and performance’, number.
Journal of Operations Management, Vol. 21, pp.129–149. Comment [t8]: Author: Please provide the issue
Thyla, P.R. and Rajenthira Kumar, D. (2011) ‘Transformation to lean manufacturing by an number.
automotive component manufacturing company’, International Journal of Lean Thinking,
Vol. 2, No. 2. Comment [t9]: Author: Please provide the page
Womack, J.P., Jones, D.T. and Ross, D. (1990) The Machine that Changed the World, numbers.
pp.17–70, ISBN: 0-89256-350-8, Macmillan Publishing Company, Canada.