You are on page 1of 82

Lecture 2 -

ShallowFoundations
Shallow Foundations

Shallow Foundations are used


whenever possible; they are the
most economical foundation system.

Need to consider:
• soil strength (i.e., bearing capacity)
• settlement
Shallow Foundations: Definitions

• Individual (isolated) footing – supports


single column
• Combined footing – supports group of two
or more columns
• Continuous (wall) footing –supports wall
• Mat (or raft) supports entire structure (or
portion of structure)

3
Bearing Capacity Theory
Ultimate Bearing Capacity: refers to the
applied stress that will just cause a shear
failure of the soil (qult)

Allowable Bearing Pressure: refers to the


applied stress the soil can safely support
(qall = qult/FS).

Footing design must be safe against:


– Foundation failure (bearing capacity)
– Excessive settlement (often controls) 12
Foundation Engineering
General
Shear

Local Shear

Punching
Shear

5
6
General Shear Failure
• Well defined shear surface & failure pattern
• Continuous slip surface
• Sudden and catastrophic failure
• Failure accompanied by tilting
• Bulging on both sides of footing
• Typical for dense soils

7
Local Shear Failure
• Failure pattern defined only under footing
• Bulging at sides of footing
• Large vertical settlement, but no collapse or tilting
• Settlement = 3%-15% B

8
Punching Shear Failure
• Failure pattern difficult to observe
• As load increases, soil under footing
compresses
• Soil outside footing remains relatively
uninvolved
• No movement of soil outside of footing
• Small, sudden jerks of vertical movement, but no
collapse or tilting
• Typical for loose soil
• Settlement = 3%-15% B
9
10
Bearing Capacity Simple Model

11
12
Terzaghi’s Bearing Capacity
Theory
• Based on classical theory of plasticity

• Based on Prandtl solution for


punching of a rigid base into a softer
material (1920)

• Based on material with rigid plastic


behavior. Therefore, solution is strictly
limited to “general shear failure”

13
Terzaghi’s Bearing Capacity Theory
Assumptions:

• Soil is rigid plastic material


• Shearing resistance of overburden is
neglected
• Overburden soil is modeled as a surcharge load
• Length/width (L/B) is large; i.e., continuous
footing
• Soil strength modeled as Mohr-Coulomb

14
15
Terzaghi’s Bearing Capacity

For Terzaghi Df<B. Others: Df<4B


17
Terzaghi: Φ , Vesic: 45°+ Φ/2

Shear strength of this soil is not considered by


Terzaghi
Terzaghi’s Bearing Capacity
Nγ ?

20
21
Terzaghi’s Bearing Capacity for square
and circular foundations

22
23
25
27
 Arena Seca

𝜸𝒅 c´=0 ∅′

 Arcilla saturada en el largo plazo o arena saturada

𝜸′ c´ ∅′

 Arcilla saturada en el corto plazo

𝜸 𝒔𝒂𝒕 cu ∅=0

28
General Bearing Capacity Equation
(Meyerhof, Hansen and Vesic) Ver Bowles
Meyerhof:

29
Meyerhof:

30
Hansen

31
Hansen (H)

32
Hansen (H)

33
Hansen (H)

34
Vesic (V)

35
Vesic (V)

36
Vesic

37
General Bearing Capacity Equation
(Das recommendations)

38
Continúa…
|

40
|

Continúa…
|

42
Modifications for Water Table

43
Modifications for Water Table

44
Modifications for Water Table

45
46
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
Eccentrically Loaded Foundations

 x   x centric   x bending
Para una zapata rectangular:
P My
x  
A I
Eccentrically Loaded Foundations
Ultimate Bearing Capacity under Eccentric
Loading —One-Way Eccentricity
Effective Area Method (Meyerhoff, 1953)

59
Ultimate Bearing Capacity under Eccentric
Loading —
One-Way Eccentricity
Effective Area Method (Meyerhoff, 1953)

60
Ultimate Bearing Capacity under Eccentric
Loading — Hansen or Vesic (Alternative)

61
62
63
64
65
66
Ultimate Bearing Capacity under Eccentric Loading
Two-Way Eccentricity

67
Ultimate Bearing Capacity under Eccentric Loading
Two-Way Eccentricity

68
Continúa…
70
71
Continúa…
73
BEARING CAPACITY FOR
FOOTINGS ON LAYERED SOILS

75
 If H is large
85
86
Stratified soils
 Método de parámetros promedios (REVISAR Bowles, pág.
254):

Estos valores se reemplazan en las ecuaciones asumiendo suelo


homogéneo

Universidad del Norte87

You might also like