You are on page 1of 7

Journal of Tropical Pediatrics Advance Access published February 13, 2015

Journal of Tropical Pediatrics, 2015, 0, 1–7


doi: 10.1093/tropej/fmv002
Original Paper

Evaluation of duration of antibiotic therapy in


neonatal bacterial meningitis: a randomized

Downloaded from http://tropej.oxfordjournals.org/ at University of California, San Francisco on February 20, 2015
controlled trial
by N. B. Mathur,1 Prarthana Kharod1, and Surinder Kumar2
1
Department of Neonatology, Maulana Azad Medical College, New Delhi, India
2
Department of Microbiology, Maulana Azad Medical College, New Delhi, India
Correspondence: N. B. Mathur, Department of Neonatology, Maulana Azad Medical College, New Delhi. Tel: þ919968604308.
E-mail <drnbmathur@ gmail.com>

SU M MAR Y
Objectives: To compare the effect of 10 days versus 14 days of antibiotic therapy in neonatal
meningitis on treatment failure rate.
Methods: The study was a randomized controlled trial conducted at a referral neonatal unit. The
participants were 70 neonates with meningitis randomized to receive 10 days (study group) or 14
days (control group) of antibiotics. The primary outcome measure studied was treatment failure in
each group within 28 days of enrolment.
Results: None of the neonates among either of the groups had occurrence of meningitis during
follow-up. Occurrence of sepsis was observed after discharge in three neonates in the control group
and none in the study group. Brainstem-evoked response audiometry was abnormal in one neonate
in the study group. Adverse effects of drugs and neurological deficits were not observed in the study
population.
Conclusions: Short course of antibiotic therapy (10 days) is effective, with potential benefits of
shorter hospital stay.

K E Y W O R D S : duration of antibiotics, effectiveness, meningitis, treatment failure.

INTRODUCTION exposure to antibiotics tends to increase probability


Neonatal meningitis causes significant mortality and of emergence of resistant strains of bacteria. The
neurological sequelae in developing countries [1–5]. problem of antibiotic resistance has spread all around
To the best of our knowledge, there is no study eval- the world and it is affecting the developing nations
uating the duration of antibiotic treatment in neo- much harder than developed countries. Excessive
natal meningitis [6–8]. Shorter course of antibiotic over-utilization of antibiotics in hospitalized patients
therapy can potentially decrease the duration of is one of the major risk factors for development
hospitalization, number of adverse events and health- of antibiotic resistance [10]. Although dexa-
care costs and could conserve the limited resources methasone-treated neonates have been shown to
available in low-income countries [9]. Prolonged have significantly lower mortality and normalization

C The Author [2015]. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com
V

 1
2  Evaluation of duration of antibiotic therapy in neonatal bacterial meningitis

of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) by day 7, shorter dur- brainstem-evoked response audiometry (BERA) were
ation of antibiotic therapy has not been evaluated in blinded. Informed consent was taken from the par-
neonates with meningitis administered dexametha- ents in a written format. All eligible neonates were
sone [5]. The objective of the present study was to randomized to receive a total of 10 days (study
compare the effect of a 10-day course (study group) group) or 14 days (control group) of antibiotic treat-
with a 14-day course (control group) of antibiotic ment. Rest of the treatment was similar in both the
treatment in neonatal meningitis on treatment failure groups. All neonates in both the groups received
rate (recurrence of serious bacterial infection within dexamethasone in the dose of 0.15 mg/kg intraven-
28 days of enrolment). ously every 6 h for 48 h as per unit protocol [5].

Downloaded from http://tropej.oxfordjournals.org/ at University of California, San Francisco on February 20, 2015
Temperature, respiratory rate, heart rate, blood pres-
sure, capillary filling time, peripheral pulses, mental
MATERIALS AND METHODS
status, urine output, oxygen saturation and blood gas
This pilot randomized controlled trial was conducted analysis were recorded in all cases. Neonates in the
in the referral neonatal unit of a teaching government study group were admitted at least for 14 days (4
hospital providing tertiary care to outborn neonates days after cessation of antibiotics) for close observa-
delivered in community hospitals or at home. Eligible tion. The patients were followed up daily for 1 week
neonates consecutively admitted with meningitis dur- and then weekly till day 28 of enrolment (i.e. day 35
ing the period from May 2012 through January 2013 of starting antibiotics). Danger signs (poor feeding,
were enrolled. Neonates with major congenital mal- lethargy, cough, chest retractions, diarrhea, seizures
formations were excluded. A sample size of 70 neo- and abdominal distension) were explained at the
nates with meningitis was calculated based on the time of discharge with the advice to report immedi-
number of neonates admitted to the referral neonatal ately in case of any symptoms. Outcome parameters
unit with meningitis in the previous year. The diagno- studied were treatment failure in each group within
sis of neonatal meningitis was made on the basis of 28 days of enrolment (defined as clinical sepsis along
presence of >32 cells/mm3 in the CSF examination with abnormal CSF picture), adverse effects of drugs,
[11, 12] in a sick neonate along with any of the fol- neurological deficit and sensorineural hearing loss by
lowing: abnormal total leukocyte count defined as BERA. BERA was performed using click stimuli de-
less than 5,000 or more than 20,000/mm3, raised im- livering monophasic square pulses of 100 ms duration
mature/total neutrophil count ratio (>0.2), elevated at the rate of 10 Hz through headphones.
micro-erythrocyte sedimentation rate and raised Contralateral ear was masked with continuous white
C-reactive protein. CSF examination was done at ad- noise. It was done after 3–4 weeks of discharge and
mission (baseline) for cells, protein, sugar, Gram repeated further after 4 weeks if initial study showed
stain, culture and sensitivity. Blood culture was per- abnormality. The study was approved by the institu-
formed under aseptic conditions by collecting 1 ml of tional ethical committee.
venous blood in a bottle containing tryptic soy broth. Statistical analysis was done using the software
The sensitivity of the organisms to the commonly version SPSS 16. The continuous variables were
used antibiotics was tested. Cranial ultrasonography tested by using Student t-test and categorical vari-
was done by day 7 of antibiotic therapy. All cases of ables by Pearson chi-square test. For variables with
neonatal meningitis who by day 7 of antibiotic treat- non-Gaussian distribution, Mann–Whitney test was
ment had clinical remission, normal CSF and no evi- applied. Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to com-
dence of infection on cranial ultrasonography were pare pre- and post-intervention variables within the
enrolled in the study (on day 7 of antibiotic therapy). same group. Probability of less than 5% (p < 0.05)
The randomization sequence was generated using was considered significant.
random allocation software in variable blocks of 2 or
4 and concealed by placing the group allocation
in sealed opaque envelopes. The study was not RESULTS
blinded. However, the persons who examined A flowchart of participants in the study is presented
CSF and performed cranial ultrasonography and in Fig. 1. A total of 130 neonates were admitted with
Evaluation of duration of antibiotic therapy in neonatal bacterial meningitis  3

Assessed for eligibility (n=130)

DID NOT MEET INCLUSION CRITERIA

(by day 7 of antibiotic therapy) (n= 60)

Refused to participate: 0

Downloaded from http://tropej.oxfordjournals.org/ at University of California, San Francisco on February 20, 2015
Randomized (n=70)

Allocated to intervention (Study group, n=35) Allocated to intervention (Controls, n=35)


Received Allocated intervention (n=35) Received Allocated intervention (n=35)

Lost to follow up (n=0) Lost to follow up (n=0)


Discontinued intervention (n=0) Discontinued intervention (n=0)

Analysed till day 28 after enrolment Analysed till day 28 after enrolment
(n=35) (n=35)

Occurrence of sepsis during follow up: 0 Occurrence of sepsis during follow up: 3
Death during follow up: 1 Death during follow up: 2

FIG. 1. Flow of study.

neonatal meningitis during the study period. Out of in three patients in the study group and one patient
these, 60 did not meet inclusion criteria (Fig. 1, in the control group. The antibiotic sensitivity of
Table 1). Both the groups were comparable with ref- Klebsiella isolates was 66% to ceftriaxone, 75% to
erence to age, weight, gestational age, gender, onset amikacin and 50% to meropenam. Positive blood/
of sepsis and neurological signs and physiological in- CSF culture was observed in six cases in the
stability at admission (Table 2). CSF parameters study group and seven cases in the control group
were comparable in both the groups at admission (Table 4). None of the neonates in both groups had
and on day 7 of antibiotic therapy (Table 3). Blood occurrence of meningitis during follow-up. In
culture was positive at admission in 11 of 70 patients the control group, three neonates had occurrence of
(six in the study group and five in the control sepsis during follow-up (on days 18, 21 and 23),
group). Most common isolate was Klebsiella, present whereas none of the neonates in the study group had
4  Evaluation of duration of antibiotic therapy in neonatal bacterial meningitis

the same (p ¼ 0.24). The three patients with occur- compared with two in the control group (on days 20
rence of sepsis were hospitalized, treated for sepsis and 24; p ¼ 1.00) (Table 5). None of them could
and discharged. Their blood cultures were sterile and reach the hospital before death. On follow-up,
CSF examination was normal. BERA was abnormal mothers were questioned to ascertain the cause of
in one neonate in the study group. However, this death (verbal autopsy). The neonate who belonged
neonate had associated perinatal asphyxia, a known to the study group had history of lethargy and chok-
cause of abnormal BERA. One neonate expired dur- ing attack. Both the neonates in the control group
ing follow-up in the study group (on day 27), as had history of decreased activity and poor oral intake
before expiry. The probable cause of death appeared

Downloaded from http://tropej.oxfordjournals.org/ at University of California, San Francisco on February 20, 2015
to be sepsis in all. Adverse effects of antibiotics and
Table 1. Cases of neonatal meningitis not meet- dexamethasone and neurological deficits were not
ing inclusion criteria (by day 7 of antibiotic observed till day 28 after enrollment in any neonate
therapy) in the study and control groups.
Cause of ineligibility Number (n ¼ 60)

Not remitted clinically: DISCUSSION


Progression of SIRS 28 According to the National Neonatal Perinatal
Persistence of poor feeding 7 Database, septicemia/meningitis has been the com-
Persistently lethargic 3 monest cause (38%) of death among the extramural
Abnormal cranial ultrasonography 4 neonates in India [13]. Physiological instability at ad-
Persistence of CSF abnormality 2 mission is high in extramural neonates in developing
Persistently positive blood culture 2 countries, as they destabilize during transportation,
Expired before day 7 10 resulting in higher fatality [14]. In the present study,
Left against medical advice 4 mortality in post-discharge follow-up was found to
be 2.9% in the study group and 5.7% in the

Table 2. Baseline characteristics of patients of study population


Variable Study group Control group p value

Age at admission (h) Mean (SD) 274.46 (196.4) 328 (211.4) 0.29
Weight (g) Mean (SD) 2108 (529.1) 2087.7 (771.5) 0.9
Gestational age (Mean (SD) 37.37 (2.0) 36.4 (3.1) 0.45
Male gender n (%) 25 (71.4) 25 (71.4) 1
Delivery conducted by doctor 24 (68.6) 23 (65.7) 0.9
Small for gestational age n (%) 17 (48.6) 17 (48.6) 1
Early onset 72 h of age n (%) 4 (11.4) 4 (11.4) 1
Duration (h) of symptoms Mean (SD) 46.94 (32.64) 50.74 (40.01) 0.87
Hypothermia 21 27
Mild 6 (17.1) 8 (22.9) 0.55
Moderate 13 (37.1) 17 (48.6) 0.33
Severe 2 (5.7) 2 (5.7) 1.00
Hypoxia 6 (17.1) 7 (20.0) 0.76
Shock 2 (5.7) 3 (8.6) 1.00
Hypoglycemia 1 (2.9) 2 (5.7) 1.00
Small pupil 2 (5.7) 2 (5.7) 0.90
Dilated pupil 2 (5.7) 3 (7.1)
Acute renal failure 16 (45.7) 16 (45.7) 1.00
Evaluation of duration of antibiotic therapy in neonatal bacterial meningitis  5

Table 3. Comparison of CSF parameters in study population


Variable mean (SD) Study group Control group p value

Cells
At admission 114 (80) 134 (140) 0.15
Day 7 1 (4) 1 (6) 0.96
Proteins mg/dl
At admission 194.66 (50.4) 184.17 (48.5) 0.16
Day 7 130.83 (40.5) 140.64 (31.5) 0.28

Downloaded from http://tropej.oxfordjournals.org/ at University of California, San Francisco on February 20, 2015
Sugar mg/dl
At admission 49.37 (34.4) 52.26 (42.2) 0.94
Day 7 53.97 (14.370) 59.24 (17.7) 0.33
Positive blood culture N (%) 6 (17.1) 5 (14.3) 0.35
Positive CSF culture 0 2 (5.7)
Negative blood and CSF cultures 29 (82.9) 28 (80.0)

Table 4. Organisms isolated in blood/CSF cultures in study population


Organism isolated Study group (n ¼ 35) Control group (n ¼ 35) p value

Klebsiella 3 (8.6) 1 (2.9) 0.54


E. coli 1 (2.9) 1 (2.9)
Staphylococcus aureus 1 (2.9) 0
Coagulase-negative Staphylococcus 1 (2.9) 1 (2.9)
Nontyphoidal Salmonella 0 1 (2.9)
Pseudomonas 0 1 (2.9)
Acinetobacter 0 2 (5.8)

Table 5. Adverse outcomes in the study population


Outcome (follow-up till day 35) Study group n (%) Control group n (%) p value

Occurrence of sepsis 0 3 (8.6) 0.24


Death 1 (2.9) 2 (5.7) 1.00
Abnormal BERA 1 (2.9) 0 1.00
Total 2 (5.7) 5 (14.3) 0.43

control group. Adverse outcome (abnormal BERA, bacteriological response to therapy. Bacteriological
occurrence of sepsis after discharge and death) was response to therapy is monitored by sampling of
higher in the control group (14.3%) as compared CSF every 2–3 days in the first week after initiation
with the study group (5.7%). The study revealed of therapy [15]. However, the issue of the appropri-
that 10 days of antibiotics in neonatal meningitis was ate duration of antibiotic treatment had not been
as effective as 14 days of therapy and associated with subjected to adequate and conclusive research.
lower mortality and adverse outcome. The duration Scientific studies are available for effectiveness of
of treatment in neonatal bacterial meningitis is based short duration of antibiotic therapy in childhood
on clinical condition of the patient as well as (post-neonatal) meningitis [8, 16–21] and neonatal
6  Evaluation of duration of antibiotic therapy in neonatal bacterial meningitis

sepsis [22–24]. However, absence of studies to mortality in the control group. Larger studies are
evaluate the duration of antibiotic therapy for neo- required to address this issue. On post hoc analysis,
natal bacterial meningitis is highlighted in literature to detect an 11.4% reduction in occurrence of sep-
[6–8]. To the best of our knowledge, present study sis/ meningitis/death, a sample size of 93 cases in
is the first randomized controlled trial on duration of each group (1:1 ratio) would have a significance level
antibiotic therapy in neonatal meningitis. The dur- of 95% and power of 80%.
ation of treatment of childhood bacterial infection in Anti-inflammatory therapy in bacterial meningitis
general, and of meningitis specifically, has not been has been shown to decrease meningeal inflammation,
based on solid evidence [3, 25]. Early diagnosis and blood–brain barrier permeability, intracranial hyper-

Downloaded from http://tropej.oxfordjournals.org/ at University of California, San Francisco on February 20, 2015
prompt use of antibiotics are probably more import- tension, brain edema, tissue damage, long-term
ant in reducing the mortality and morbidity than an neurological sequelae and mortality rates associated
extended antibiotic treatment regimen [20]. A large with this disease [8]. There is a strong support ex-
number of septic neonates have pleocytosis in CSF, pressed for the use of adjunctive dexamethasone,
often with negative blood and CSF cultures. All of preferably before initiation of antibiotic therapy
them end up receiving long course of antibiotics for [23]. In a randomized controlled trial on dexametha-
lack of guidelines. The duration of treatment in neo- sone in neonatal meningitis in our unit [5], mortality
natal bacterial meningitis is based on the clinical con- was found to be 12.5% in the dexamethasone
dition of the patient, CSF findings as well as on the group and 40% in the control group (p ¼ 0.005).
bacteriological response to therapy [26]. We did not The absolute risk difference was 27.5% (95%
include neonates who had not remitted by day 7 CI ¼ 9.1–45.8%). There was a significant reduction
with reference to clinical condition, CSF findings or in cells (62.5 vs. 100 per mm3) and proteins (162 vs.
cranial ultrasonography because of perceived risk. A 217.5 mg/dl) after 24 h of treatment in the dexa-
total of 60 neonates (46.2%) did not meet inclusion methasone group. IL-1b was significantly reduced
criteria but were followed up. Major causes of ineligi- after 24 h in dexamethasone group (290 vs. 665 pg/
bility were need for change of antibiotics within 7 ml). TNF-a was significantly lower (157.5 vs.
days (28 babies), absence of clinical remission by 427.5 pg/ml) and sugar significantly higher (50 vs.
day 7 of antibiotic therapy (10 babies), leaving 38 mg/dl) in the dexamethasone group after 24 h.
against medical advice within 7 days of antibiotic Significant benefit was noted with dexamethasone
therapy (4 babies) and death within 7 days of antibi- therapy in the progression of systemic inflammatory
otic therapy (10 babies). If 14 babies in the last two response syndrome (SIRS). Normalization of CSF
categories are excluded, 61% of all neonates with by day 7 was significantly more (p ¼ 0.01) in dexa-
meningitis (46 out of 116) would be eligible for the methasone group as compared with the control
potential benefits of short duration of antibiotics. group [5]. Yu et al. [27] in a study on purulent men-
Shorter course of antibiotic therapy can potentially ingitis in neonatal period, observed very high mortal-
decrease the duration of hospitalization, number of ity (75%) in the control group as compared with the
adverse events and healthcare costs and could con- steroid group (41%). Present study suggests that
serve the limited resources available in low-income dexamethasone administration may have a role in
countries [9]. Prolonged exposure to antibiotics reducing the duration of antibiotic therapy. Being a
tends to increase probability of emergence of resist- pilot study, the limitation of our study is small sam-
ant strains of bacteria. The problem of antibiotic re- ple size in a single center. For the purpose of the
sistance has spread all around the world and it is study (success of antibiotic therapy in eradicating
affecting poor and developing nations much harder infection), a follow-up of 28 days was considered suf-
than developed countries. Excessive over-utilization ficient. However, a longer follow-up is desirable.
of antibiotics in hospitalized patients is one of
the major risk factors for development of antibiotic CONCLUSION
resistance [10]. This could be a probable factor In conclusion, shorter duration of antibiotic therapy
explaining higher rates of recurrence of sepsis and in neonatal meningitis is associated with lesser
Evaluation of duration of antibiotic therapy in neonatal bacterial meningitis  7

adverse events (abnormal BERA and recurrence of 14. Mathur NB, Arora D. Role of TOPS (a simplified assess-
infection). The potential benefits include shorter ment of neonatal acute physiology ) in predicting mortal-
duration of hospitalization, lesser exposure to antibi- ity in transported neonates. Acta Paediatrica 2007;96:
172–5.
otics and reduction in healthcare costs. Further mul-
15. Volpe JJ. Bacterial and fungal intracranial infections. In:
ticenter trials may be done to validate the results. Neurology of the Newborn. 5th edn. Philadelphia, PA:
Saunders Elsevier;2008, 916–56.
REFERENCES 16. Lin TY, Chrane DF, Nelson JD, et al. Seven days of cef-
1. Furyk JS, Swann O, Molyneux E. Systematic review: neo- triaxone therapy is as effective as ten days treatment for
natal meningitis in the developing world. Trop Med Int bacterial meningitis. JAMA 1985;253:3559–63.

Downloaded from http://tropej.oxfordjournals.org/ at University of California, San Francisco on February 20, 2015
Health 2011;16:672–9. 17. Kavaliotis J, Manios SG, Kansouzidou A, et al. Treatment
2. Ramakrishnan M, Ulland A, Sreinhardt LC, et al. Sequelae of childhood bacterial meningitis with ceftriaxone once
due to bacterial meningitis among African children: a sys- daily: open, prospective, randomized, comparative study
tematic literature review. BMC Med 2009;7:47. of short-course versus standard-length therapy.
3. Goetghebuer T, West TE, Wermenbol V. Outcome of Chemotherapy 1989;35:296–303.
meningitis caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae and 18. Martin E, Hohl P, Guggi T. Short course single daily cef-
Haemophilus influenza type b in children in the Gambia. triaxone monotherapy for acute bacterial meningitis in
Trop Med Int Health 2000;5:207–13. children: results of a Swiss multicenter study. Part I: clin-
4. Murray CJ, Lopez AD. Mortality by cause for eight re- ical results. Infection 1990;18:70–7.
gions of the world: Global burden of disease study. 19. Roine I, Ledermann W, Foncea LM, et al. Randomized
Lancet 1997;349:1269–76. trial of four vs. seven days of ceftriaxone treatment for
5. Mathur NB, Garg A, Mishra TK. Role of dexamethasone bacterial meningitis in children with rapid initial recovery.
in neonatal meningitis: a randomized controlled trial. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2000;19:219–22.
Indian J Pediatr 2013;80:102–7. 20. Singhi P, Kaushal M, Singhi S, et al. Seven days vs. 10
6. Heath PT, Yusoff NKN, Baker CJ. Review: neonatal men- days ceftrixone therapy in bacterial meningitis. J Trop
ingitis. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2003;88:F173–8. Pediatr 2002;48:273–9.
7. Tunkel AR, Harman BJ, Kaplan SL, et al. Practical guide- 21. Molyneux E, Shaikh QN, Saha S, et al. 5 versus 10 days of
lines for the management of bacterial meningitis. Clin treatment with ceftriaxone for bacterial meningitis in chil-
Infect Dis 2004;39:1267–84. dren: a double- blind randomized equivalence study.
8. Karageorgopoulos DE,Valkimade PE, Kapaskelis A, et al. Lancet 2011;377:1837–45.
Short versus long duration of antibiotic therapy for bac- 22. Gathwala G, Sindwani A, Singh J, et al. Ten days versus
terial meningitis: a meta-analysis of randomized con- fourteen days Antibiotic therapy in culture-proven neo-
trolled trials in children. Arch Dis child 2009;94:607–14. natal sepsis. J Trop Pediatr 2010;56:433–35.
9. Quagliarello V, Scheld WM. Bacterial meningitis: patho- 23. Gathwala G, Dutta S, Narang A. Randomized controlled
genesis, pathophysiology and progress. N Engl J Med trial of 7-day versus 14-day antibiotics for neonatal sepsis.
1992;327:864–72. J Trop Pediatr 2006;52:427–32.
10. Alanis AJ. Resistance to Antibiotics: Are We In The Post- 24. Saini SS, Dutta S, Ray P, et al. Short course versus 7-day
Antibiotic Era?. Arch Med Res 2005;36:697–705. course of intravenous antibiotics for probable neonatal
11. Sarff LD, Platt LH, McCracken GH. Cerebrospinal septicemia. A pilot, open-label, randomized controlled
fluid evaluation in neonates: comparison of high-risk trial. Indian Pediatr 2011;48:19–24.
infants with and without meningitis. J Pediatr 1976;88: 25. Lambert HP. Don’t keep taking the tablets? Lancet 1999;
473–7. 354:943–5.
12. Palazzi DL, Klein JO, Baker CJ: Bacterial sepsis and 26. Beek DVD, Brouwer MC. Systematic review: no differ-
meningitis. In: JS Remington, JO Klein, CB Wilson, et al. ence between short-course and long-course antibiotics for
(eds). Infectious Diseases of the Fetus and Newborn Infant. bacterial meningitis in children, but available evidence
6th edn. Philadelphia: Elsevier Saunders, 2006. limited. Evid Based Med 2010;15:6–7.
13. Report of the National Neonatal Perinatal Database. 27. Yu JS, Grauaug A. Purulent meningitis in the neonatal
Delhi: National Neonatology Forum of India, 2002–03. period. Arch Dis Child 1963;38:391–6.

You might also like