This document discusses guidelines for highway geometric design in urban areas. It addresses selecting design designations and design speeds. When choosing design standards, continuity of roadway configuration and speed is desirable when possible. Design speeds in urban areas are lower than rural areas. The highway service classification must still be maintained within municipalities, though some adjustments to standards may be reasonable given local road use. A table provides examples of coordinating rural and suggested urban design designations. The document also discusses setting consistent design, operating, and posted speeds within roadway classifications. It notes physical constraints often determine design more than speed for retrofit urban roadway projects.
This document discusses guidelines for highway geometric design in urban areas. It addresses selecting design designations and design speeds. When choosing design standards, continuity of roadway configuration and speed is desirable when possible. Design speeds in urban areas are lower than rural areas. The highway service classification must still be maintained within municipalities, though some adjustments to standards may be reasonable given local road use. A table provides examples of coordinating rural and suggested urban design designations. The document also discusses setting consistent design, operating, and posted speeds within roadway classifications. It notes physical constraints often determine design more than speed for retrofit urban roadway projects.
This document discusses guidelines for highway geometric design in urban areas. It addresses selecting design designations and design speeds. When choosing design standards, continuity of roadway configuration and speed is desirable when possible. Design speeds in urban areas are lower than rural areas. The highway service classification must still be maintained within municipalities, though some adjustments to standards may be reasonable given local road use. A table provides examples of coordinating rural and suggested urban design designations. The document also discusses setting consistent design, operating, and posted speeds within roadway classifications. It notes physical constraints often determine design more than speed for retrofit urban roadway projects.
Designation Generally, when selecting the standards to be As with the selection of the design descriptor, applied to a given roadway, the basic parameter continuity of roadway configuration, e.g. divided for the selection of geometric standards is design or undivided is desirable. Continuity of speed is speed. In urban conditions for new construction also desirable, but not often practical or or major reconstruction this same approach achievable. Generally, design speeds used in applies. When setting the design speed, service urban areas are substantially less than those used classification and roadway function need to be in rural areas. The Highway Service considered. Classification must be maintained through municipalities. However, the spacing of It is desirable to provide a reasonable degree of accesses, design speed, number of lanes, consistency in the design speeds, operating presence of parking lanes may not be the same as speeds and subsequently the posted speed in the rural setting and some tradeoffs may be selected within each classification subgroup or practical and reasonable when local use of the group. For example, the posted speed for all highway is taken into consideration. minor Arterial roads within a municipality should be identical or near identical and typically The following table is a correlation between the the design speed is 10 km/h higher than the current rural designations and the proposed posted speed. Where the legal speed limit is not urban designations. When selecting an urban readily available, designers may obtain this designation, as a minimum, the designer should information from the Department. Where the strive to provide the Suggested Design speed limit is not posted in urban municipalities, Designation. the legal speed limit is 50 km/h. Driver expectations are met in this manner. When Table U.A.3.2 Coordination of Rural and selecting a design speed for a given roadway Urban Design Designations within a municipality, the designer should review the design speed of similar roadways Rural Designation Suggested Design before making a final decision. Designation in Urban Setting Many urban roadways traverse existing built up RFD – 130 UFD – 110 areas where the physical, environmental and RAD – 130 UAD–110 or UED–90 property constraints are frequently the prevailing RAU – 214.4 -120 UED – 90 controls rather than the design speed. Typical (future 4 lane) geometric design practice considers the RAU – 213.0 -110 UAD – 407.4-80 or RAU – 212.0 -110 UAU – 211-70 constraints imposed and then analyzes the design RAU – 211.0 - 110 for acceptability from the safety and operational RAU – 210 -110 UAD – 407.9-60 or points of view. If the analysis concludes that the RAU – 209 -110 UAU – 210 - 70 design is unacceptable, revisions are required to RCU – 209 -110 UCU – 211.0-60 minimize the influence of constraints or to RCU – 208 -110 modify the expectations of the driver. The All Local Roads ULU differences between the two approaches (that for Note: The pavement width has been omitted from the table in new urban construction projects and that for some cases because it was not relevant to the comparison. severely controlled urban retrofit projects) are illustrated in the following flow chart: