University of Santo Tomas Faculty of Civil Law Remedial Law Department EVIDENCE, ‘Concept of evidence Scope of the Rules on Evidence Evidence in civil cates versus evidence in eriminal cases roof vernis evidence actu probans vers fst praband vee 3. Admissibility of evidence 1. Requisies for admissibility of evidence ‘© Pasple n Lange, GR No, 186228, March 15, 010 © Perle» Parungo, G.R. No, 125812, Norember 28, 1996 Relevance of evidence and collateral matters ‘Multiple admissibility Conditional admissibility Curative admissibility Direct and cizcumstantal evidence © Peple x Quizes, GR No 142532, November 18, 2003, © Pople, Rar Baron GR. No, 213215, January 11, 2016 © Pepe x Vicor, GR. No, 172468, October 15, 208 7. Positive and negative evidence Docimented Ali © Lijano 1 Pep, GR. No, 176389/ 176864, December 14, 2010 B. Competent and credible evidence avee Burden of proof and burden of evidence © Mawongong» Estine, GR. Ne, 136773, June 25, 2003 © Philippine Tit Company (ala en as Pras Bank 5 Redontr R. Gabinete a, GR. No, 216120, March 29, 2017 ). Presumptions 1. Conclusive presumptions ‘© Data Movers Belpavia Realy, GR. No, 144268, August 30, 2006 2. Disputable presumptions Liberal construction of the Rules on Evidence Quantum of evidence (weight and suliciency of evidence) 1. Proof beyond reasonable doubt 1) Corpus dels ‘© Rimorin ». People, GR. No, 146481, April 30, 2003 2. Preponderance of evidence “© Raymundo Lanaria, GR. No, 171036, October 17, 2008 3. Substantial evidence 4. Clear and convincing evidence Judicial notice and judicial admissions 1. What need not be proved2. Matters of judicial notice 2) Mandatory ») Diseretonary © Corinthian Garden. Spouses Tanjangso, GR. No, 160795, June 27, 2008 © Socal Justice Sony n Atenss, GR. No. 156052, Ferry 13, 2008 (© “G" Holdings, Inc National Mires and Aled Worker, GR. No, 160236, Octber 16, 2009 © Spones Lap». Chua, G.R. No. 177809, October 16, 2009 3. Judicial admissions 1) Effect of judicial admissions 'b) How judicial admissions may be contradicted "Caen ». Taiay Tors Sport Complex, GR. Na, 174154, October 17, 2008 Teabibe Information n Canisoe of nena Reveae, C.R. No157594, Mand 9, 2010 “4. Judicial notice of foreign laws, law of nations and municipal ordinance H. Object eeal) evidence 1, Nature of object evidence fe BPI Rees, GR. No. 157177, Febary 11, 2008 Pape x Malini, 264 SCRA 167 2. Requistes for admissibility 3. Categories of object evidence Papen Brdudan, GR. No, 178196, Argus 6, 2008 “© Paple x Brin, GR. No. 138534, March 17, 2004 © Sonn Pople, GR. Nor 10828083, November 16, 1995: Jaren Court of Appeals, CR. No. 118441, January 18, 2000 ‘Demonstrative evidence ‘View of an objector scene (Chain of evsody, in telation to Section 21 of the Comprehensive Dangerous Drugs Act ‘of 2002, as amended ‘e Papen Ram Lin y Mirada, GR. No. 231989, Scpambr 4, 2018 1. Role on DNA Evidence (A.M. No. 06-11-5-SC) ‘© Pople n Vall, 382 SCRA 192 © Paolo n Yaar, 428 SCRA 508 © Ine Estate of Rogelio Ong» Dies, G.R. No. 171713, Desember 14, 2007 owe I, Documentary evidence 1. Meaning of documentary evidence 2. Requistes for admissibility 3. Best Bvidence Rule 8) Meaning of the rule ') When applicable ‘) Meaning of original 1) Requisites for introduction of secondary evidence "e Repwbl x Ilda “Ie” Manor Manoa, al, GR. No. 171701, Febraary 8, 2012 Eda Shangri s. BF Corporation, CR. Ne. 145842, June 27, 2008 Cina Gaw 1, Cha GR. No. 160835, April 16, 2008 Sanson n, NLRC, GR. Na. 160855, April 16, 2008 ECS t, Del Rosario, GR. No. 146596, January 26, 2005 © Roelio Dantrn,Jlio Maghinan, Jr. G.R No. 191696, Apri 10, 2013, 4, Parol Evidence Rule 2) Application ofthe pur evidence rule ) When parol evidence can be introduced Distinctions between the best evidence rule and par evidence rale© ACK Phi acm Cag, GR. Ne 74466, Jb 4 2008 © Seautl Petroleum Carporation », Antocorp, Group, CR. No, 164326, October 17, 2008 © Mary Exo, GR Na 168387 gu 25,2070 5. Rules on Electronic Evidence (A.M. No. 01-7-01-SC) 2) Scope coverage meaning of cceuoaie evince cero data menage 8) Probuve vac of elecwonie documents o evidentiary weight method of proot «) Auhentcaon of eerie documents and eeewonie signs {} Electronic documents ve--e he essay rae ‘Avda, phorogaphiey ide and ephemeral evidence 2 Pap 2 Nel Enya als GR. No 204895, Mand 10, 2018 2 MCC nana Suits Cp 1 Sangong Cop, GR No. 17063, October 17,2007 6. Authentication and proof of documents 2) Meaning of authentication 3 Public and prvate documents © Sur Feipen Ppl; GR. No, 170974, Ma 3, 2008 “Repubofthe Pinan Cre Santo Gals, GR No. 215009, Jaman 23,2017 9 when a para wntngreques authentication: proof of a private wong © Bag Bai, 31 SCRA 764 Lionas Lon G2. Ne, 150162, Jnr 26,2007 4 Doming n Reb, 453 SCRA 812 Sean Fane, Prin Real Perper, nc GR No 158144, July 31, 2008, {p When idence of rutheniiy ofa private wring is not required ancient cues) How to prove geminenes of handing § Pubic documenta evden; proof of oficial ecord f) Anes of copy fy ruc econd opie document 3 Proof of lek of eco ) Hows ude eco impeached 1) Proofaf moa documents [Vio to expan aesdoos i doce 1m) Documentary evidence in an unofficial language J. Testimonial evidence 1. Quaifcatoas ofa witness ‘© Nerthust Aiki, Ie Chon C-R- NO, 195550, January 31, 2008 2. Competency versus credibility of a wines 3. Disqualfcations of witnesses ') By reason of mental capacity or jmmarasty Papen. Golimbin, GR. No, 145225, Apr 2, 2004 1) By reaion of manage (© Albarezn Rami, 473 SCRA 72 © Poype x Pansensy, 388 SCRA 669 Ppl Quit, 297 SCRA 1 6) By reason of death or insanity of adverse party (© Sansn Court of Appel, GR. No, 127745, Apel 22,2003 © Tan CA, 295 SCRA 755 Racor CA, 207 SCRA 234 © Bordala . CA, 374 SCA S55 4) By reaion of prvleged communications fe Mevaio x Vitro, AC. 5110, May 26, 2005 © Raglan Sandganbaan, GR. No, 105938, September 20, 1996 ‘© Papen. Imencon, GR. Ne. 131636, Mand 5, 2003 a eee© Gonzales» CA, GR. No. 117740, October 30, 1998 © erin Senate Conti on Accuntailiy, CR No, 180643, Marc 25, 2008 excel te Pip Erin GR NO. 1877, Ap 25, 2008 Examination ofa witness 1) Rights and obligations of a witness 'b) Order inthe examination of an individual witness i, Direct examination ii. Cross examination i, Re-dzeet examination iv, Re-eross examination v. Recalling the wimess «Leading and misleading questions €) Methods of impeachment of adverse pary’s witness ‘© Chua Ga » Gas, GR. No. 160855, April 16, 2008) 5 How the witness is impeached by evidence of inconsistent statements (aying the predicate) ‘Evidence of the good chanicter ofa witness 1) Judicial Aidit Rule (A.M. No, 12-8-8- so) 5. Admissions and confessions 8) Ret infer alos acta re ') Admission by a party ‘© Rujia Pati, Aleatain, 434 SCRAH9 ©) Offer of Compromise 1S Paplen Exgice, GR. Na, 171348, November 26, 2008 {&) Admission by a thind party ) Admitson bya cosparines or agent ‘© Republic x Sandigebayan, 406 SCRA 190 Admission by 2 conspizator Tamar». Angas. GR. Na, 177727, Jonnary 1, 2010 Pape, Vd, De Ramos, $03 SCRA 167 ‘© Pepe Bahanan, 639 SCRA 157 2) Admission by puives ‘© Gane» JAC, 189 SCRA 201 1) Admission by silence (© Eciraa » Desierto, 356 SCRA 108 1) Confessions | People, Mui, GR. No. 181043, Oxo 8, 2008 © Pape, Sata, G.R. Ne, 133858, Angut 12,2003, 2) Sima acts as evidence Bank of Commons» Masal, GR. No, 158149, Fray 9, 2006 2) Meaning of hearsay 5) Reason for exclusion of hearsay evidence ) Exceptions tothe hearsay rule i Dying declaration ‘+ Peple Taber, CR. No, 158169, Febmary 24, 2010 i, Declaration agnnst interest fil Actor declaration about pedigree jv. Family reputation or tradition regarding pedigree v. Common reputation vi. Part ofthe ns gfar ‘© Martrils x Pople G.R. No. 163217, Apni 18, 2006vil Ents in the regular course of business © Seomity Bank s. Gan, GR. Ne, 150464, June 27, 2006 vii, Enuies in official ecords ix. Commercial lists and the lke © Monat», Quiswmbing, GR.No. 127598, Febrnay 22, 2000, x Lesmed treaties ‘xi Testimony or deposition aa former tial 7. Opinion mule 8) Opinion of expett witness 1b) Opinion of ordinary witness © Daming 1, Deming, GR. No, 150897, April 11, 2005 8, Character evidence 1) Criminal eases ') Civil eases © People Les, GR. Na, 139070, May 29, 2002 9. Rule on Examination of a Child Wimess (A.M No. 004-07-SC) © Pape. Canee, GR. No. 491920, Mart 28, 2003 K. Offer and objection 1. Offer of evidence “© Ales Cnet. CIR, GR. No, 159490, Febrvary 18, 2008, © Digyn x Court of Appeal, GR. No, 140844, April 30,2008 (© Republiof te Phipps» Vakatina Exinse, Regia of Deds of Negros Octal tal, GR. No, 185603, Api 5, 2017 ‘When o make an offer Objection Repetiion of n objection Ruling Seiki out of an answer ‘Tender of excluded evidence © Crreal Layers, AMLRTY-06-2005, July 14, 2006 Noweee