FUNDAMENTALS OF FAMILY LAW1

Compulsory Course

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES OF THE COURSE

Every natural and legal person is assigned a personal law defining his or her status and capacity.
The connecting factors determining one’s personal law vary from one legal system to another. For
instance, common law adopts nationality, Islamic law assigns personal law by religion etc. A study of
Principles of Family Law in India is only one of its kinds in the world. In India Family Law is the
personal law of the person which deals with the matter pertaining to a person and his or her family.
Hindu, Muslim, Christian and Parsi have their different personal law in India. Some of these laws are
uncodified while some others are codified. “Personal Laws” are a common legacy of colonialism and
liberation from colonialism in India. The regime of "personal laws" originated in the political domain in
periods of political and territorial conquest. Both conquered and conquering people carried with them,
laws which were "personal" to them. While the constitutional provisions of India are democratic and
secular, their colonial legacy ensured that they inherited a common problem of plural legal systems. This
system of laws dealing with the so called private domain of the family is a branch of laws that has come
to be known as "personal laws".

Compulsory course on “Principles of Family Law” is offered to the second year third semester
students. This course is an introduction to the basic fundamental principles of family law in India.
Objectives of the course are as follows:

1. Compulsory Course on Principles of Family Law tries to provide students not just an explanation
of the law as it stands but also an account of its historical background.
2. Course provides discussion of legal principles combined with authoritative discussion of policy,
practices, issues etc.
3. Course covers the core areas of family law such as marriage, divorce, maintenance, adoption,
custody, guardianship, acknowledgement, successions etc.
4. Course includes an analysis of the factors underlying development and a prompt to encourage
discussion of the laws, effectiveness in contemporary society.
5. The course includes discussion of key policy development including Law Commission Reports.
6. Course covers case presentations and generate discussion on the issues raised in these cases.

Marks Distribution
Tutorials 30
Class Participation 10
End Sem Exam 55
………………
Total 100
                                                            
1
 Dr.Kavita Singh, Assistant Professor (Law) 
 ………………

JULY
TOTAL 60 HOURS TEACHING

4TH JULY MONDAY (TWO HOUR) Nature and Scope of Hindu law

Readings:

i. Mayne’s Treatise on Hindu Law & Usage, Ranganath Misra, 15th ed., 2006.[PREFACE]
ii. P V Kane, HDS, Vol 1 Part 1 at pg 3
iii. Critique of Modern Hindu Law Book Review by Sampat, 1972JILI 443- 458.
iv. Derret, Hindu law, 1984 IBR 322-342 .
v. H A Freeman, An Introduction to Hindu Jurisprudence, The American Journal of
Comparative Law, Vol. 8, No. 1, Winter, 1959.
vi. EDITORIALS, The Hindu Code Bill, EPW 1949 I at pg 52.
vii. LETTERS TO THE EDITOR, Hindu code Bill and agri-Cultural Holdings, EPW 1952 Vol IV at p
49.
viii.

5ST JULY TUESDAY (ONE HOUR) Sources of different personal laws in India
Readings:

i. Hon’ble Katju,M, J., Ancient Indian Jurisprudence vis-a-vis Modern Indian

Jurisprudence, AIR 2008 Journal 65.
ii. Hon’ble Katju,M, J., The importance of Mitakshara in the 21st Century, AIR 2005
Journal 215.
iii. A.M. Bhattacharjee, Hindu Law and the Constitution, 2nd ed., Eastern Law House, 2005.

7TH JULY THURSDAY (ONE HOUR) Hindu law applies to..

Readings:
i. Shastri Yagnapurushadasi v Muldas Vaishya, AIR 1966 SC 1119. Dr. Radhakrishnan,
“The Hindu View of life”.
ii. Raghavacharya, Hindu law, 6th Ed at 845-46.

11TH JULY MONDAY (TWO HOUR) Discussion & Class Participation

i. Shastri Yagnapurushadasi v Muldas Vaishya, AIR 1966 SC 1119.

ii. Perumal v poonnuswami, AIR 1971 SC 2352
iii. CM Arumugan v S. Raja Gopal, (1976) 1 SCC 863
iv. Vimla Bai v Hira lal Gupta, (1990) 2 SCC 22.

12ST JULY TUESDAY (ONE HOUR) Hindu marriage

i. A Critique of Modern Hindu Law, Duncan M. Derrett, (1970)

ii. Family Law Lectures Family Law I, Kusum, 2007, LexisNexis Butterworths
iii. Family Law I & II, Poonam Pradhan Saxena, Halsbury’s Law’s of India, Vol. 10, 26 & 28
LexisNexis Butterworth Publications.

14TH JULY THURSDAY (ONE HOUR) valid condition for Hindu marriage/
ceremonies of Hindu marriage/.

i. Ceremonial Validity of Hindu Marriages : Need for Reform, (1977) 2 SCC (Jour) 22.
ii. Factum Valet Essays in Classical and Modern Hindu Law: Current problems and the
legacy of.. By John Duncan Martin Derrett, pg 79-84.
i. Sarla Mudgal v UOI, AIR 1995 SC 1531
ii. Lily Thomas v UOI, AIR 2000 SC 1650

18TH JULY MONDAY (TWO HOUR) Discussion & Class Participation

i. Bhaurao Shankar Lokhande v. State of Maharashtra, AIR 1965 SC 1564

ii. Babui Panmato Kuer v. Ram Agya Singh, AIR 1968 Pat. 190
iii. Pinninti Venkataramana v. State, AIR 1977 A.P. 43
iv. P. v. K., AIR 1982 Bom. 400

19th JULY TUESDAY (ONE HOUR) Prohibited Degree/ Sapinda Relationships

i. Lata Singh v State of UP, AIR 2006 SC 2522.

ii. Budhu Singh v Laltu Singh, AIR 1915 PC 70.
iii. Reform in Indian Marriage Law: A comment on Debates of 1974-75 by Derrett, 1975
JILI 177-198.

21st JULY THURSDAY (ONE HOUR) Restitution of conjugal rights

i. Restitution of Conjugal Rights by M. Gangadevi, 2003 JILI 453-455.

ii. Wife Right to Employment Vs Husband Conjugal Right by Kusum, 1977 JILI 77-83.
iii. Week-end Marriages and Restitution of Conjugal Rights by Paras Diwan, 1978 JILI 1-28.
iv. Flavia Agnes, Conjugality, Property, Morality and Maintenance , VOL 44 No. 44
October 31 - November 06, 2009.

25TH JULY MONDAY (TWO HOUR) Discussion & Class Participation

i. Saroj Rani v Sudarshan Kumar, AIR 1984 SC 1562

ii. Dadaji Bhikaji v Rukhmabai, (1885) ILR 9 Bom
iii. T Sareetha v T Venkatasubbiah, AIR 1983 AP 356
iv. Harbinder Kaur v Harminder Singh, AIR 1984 Del 66

26TH JULY TUESDAY (ONE HOUR) PCMA/Nullity of Marriage

i. Section 16 of the Hindu Marriage Act - Illegitimate Children, 5 Journal of the Indian Law
Institute 424 (1963).
 ii. Marriage Age in India and Abroad by Tahir Mahmood, 1980 JILI 38-79.
iii. Prohibition of Child Marriage Act, 2006
iv. M.M. Malhotra v UOI, AIR 2006 SC 402

28TH JULY THURSDAY (ONE HOUR) Divorce under Hindu law

i. Changing basis of Divorce and the Hindu law by Raj Kr Agarwal, 1972 JILI 431-422.
ii. Regulating Marriage and Divorce- Need for a Comprehensive legislation, 2006 JILI at
106-111.
iii. Irretrievable Breakdown of Marriage: A Ground for Divorce, by Kusum, 1978 JILI 288-
303.
iv. Law Commission 59th Report (1974).

AUGUST
1ST AUGUST MONDAY (TWO HOUR) Discussion & Class Participation

i. Saroj Rani v Sudarshan Kumar Chaddha, AIR 1984 SC 1562

ii. Russell v Russell, 1897 AC 375.
iii. Gollins v Gollins,1964 AC 644.
iv. N.G. Dastane v. S. Dastane, AIR 1975 SC 1534

2ND AUGUST TUESDAY (ONE HOUR) Divorce under Hindu law

i. Is The Supreme Court Ready To Reinterpret “Cruelty”?

ii. 'Irretrievable Breakdown of Marriage' SCC (J)

4TH AUGUST THURSDAY (ONE HOUR) Divorce under Hindu law

i. Desirability of Instant Divorce by Judiciary:A Critique by Daljeet Singh, 2003 JILI 439.
ii. Reappraisal of Bars to Divorce: A Comparative Study by Harinder Bhopari, 1984 JILI
255-287.
iii. Fraud as a Ground for Divorce by S.Jaffer Hussian, 1969 JILI 520-534.

8TH AUGUST MONDAY (TWO HOUR) Discussion & Class Participation

i. Naveen Kohli v. Neelu Kohli, (2006) 4 SCC 558

ii. Samar Ghosh v. Jaya Ghosh, 2007 (3) SCJ 253
iii. Bipinchandra Jaisinghbai Shah v. Prabhavati, AIR 1957 SC 176
iv. Savitri Pandey v. Prem Chandra Pandey, AIR 2002 SC 591

9TH AUGUST TUESDAY (ONE HOUR) Nikah under Muslim law

i. Mulla, Principles of Mahomedan Law M. Hidayatullah and Arshad Hidayatullah,(19th ed., 2008)
 ii. Asaf A.A. Fyzee, Outlines of Muhammadan Law (2008)
iii. Muslim Family Law, David Pearl & Werner Menski, 3rd Edition 1998, Sweet & Maxwell.

11TH AUGUST THURSDAY (ONE HOUR) Dower

i. Muslim Women Right to Mahr: An Appraisal by M. Afsal Wani , 2001 JILI 388-409.
ii. Mahr and muslim Divorcee’s Right to Maintenance by Lucy Carroll, 1985 JILI 485-495.
iii. Dr. S. Indira Devi, Concept of Mahr, 2007 AIR (J) 12.
iv. Mulla, Principles of Mahomedan Law M. Hidayatullah and Arshad Hidayatullah,(19th ed., 2008)
v. Asaf A.A. Fyzee, Outlines of Muhammadan Law (2008)

15TH AUGUST MONDAY HOLIDAY

16TH AUGUST TUESDAY (ONE HOUR) Talaq under Muslim law

i. Repudiation of Maritial Tie at the Instance of Muslim Wife: Misgiving and Clarification by
Salim Akthar & mohd Wasim Ali, 2003 JILI 471-483.
ii. Furqan Ahmad, Understanding the Islamic Law of Divorce, 2003 JILI 484-508.
iii. Mulla, Principles of Mahomedan Law M. Hidayatullah and Arshad Hidayatullah,(19th ed.,
2008)
iv. Asaf A.A. Fyzee, Outlines of Muhammadan Law (2008)

18TH AUGUST THURSDAY (ONE HOUR) Talaq under Muslim law

i. Muslim Family Law, David Pearl & Werner Menski, 3rd Edition 1998, Sweet & Maxwell.
ii. Family Law Lectures Family Law I, Kusum, 2007, LexisNexis Butterworths
iii. Supreme Court on Children, Research Edited by Aparna Bhatt, Human Right law Net work.
iv. Family Law I & II, Poonam Pradhan Saxena, Halsbury’s Law’s of India, Vol. 10, 26 & 28
LexisNexis Butterworth Publications.

22ND AUGUST MONDAY (TWO HOUR) HOLIDAY

23RD AUGUST TUESDAY (ONE HOUR) Statutory Divorce under Muslim

law

i. Dissolution of Muslim Marriage Act, 1939

ii. Mulla, Principles of Mahomedan Law M. Hidayatullah and Arshad Hidayatullah,(19th ed., 2008)
at 267-276.

25TH AUGUST THURSDAY (ONE HOUR) Maintenance [Hindu] [Muslim]

i. Claim of Maintenance Under Cr. P. C by Paras Diwan, 1985 JILI 291-317.

ii. Matrimonial Causes: Dynamics of Ancillary reliefs by BK Sharma, 1989 JILI210 -225.
iii. Maintenance Claims of de facto spouses Gunvantre v. Bai Prabha, 5 Journal of the Indian
Law Institute 514 (1963).
 iv. The Saha Bano Controversy, Asghar Ali Engineer, 1987, Orient Longman.
v. Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986: A retrogressive Precedent of
Dubious Constitutionality by Lucy Caroll, 1986 JILI 364-376.
vi. Maintenance under Act 2007.

29TH AUGUST MONDAY (TWO HOUR) Discussion & Class Participation

i. Shamim Ara v. State of U.P., 2002 Cr LJ 4726 (SC)

ii. A. Yousuf Rawther v. Sowramma, AIR 1971 Ker. 261
iii. Itwari v. Asghari, AIR 1960 All. 684
iv. Danial Latifi v. Union of India, (2001) 7 SCC 740

30TH AUGUST TUESDAY (ONE HOUR) Uniform Civil Code

i. Towards a UCC:Judicial Vicissitude, by Virendra Kumar, 2000JILI 314-334.

ii. UCC Suggessions by DC Manocha, 2000 JILI 448-457.
iii. Sarla Mudgal vs. Union of India, AIR 1995 SC 1531
iv. Lilly Thomas vs. Union of India, 2000 AIR SCW 1760
v. Shah Bano’s Case and UCC - Survey of Public Opinion Among Muslim by P. Koteswar
Rao, 1985 JILI 572-577.
SEPTEMBER
1ST SEPTEMBER THURSDAY (ONE HOUR) INTRODUCTION TO LAW OF
SUCCESSION

i. Family Law Lectures, Family Law– II, Poonam Pradhan Saxena, (2nd ed., 2007)
ii. Family Law I & II, Poonam Pradhan Saxena, Halsbury’s Law’s of India, Vol. 10, 26 & 28
LexisNexis Butterworth Publications.
iii. "Some Aspects of the Indian Succession Act", 1957 Supreme Court Journal 201.

5TH SEPTEMBER MONDAY (TWO HOUR) Discussion & Class Participation

i. Commissioner of Income – tax v. Gomedalli Lakshminarayan, AIR 1935 Bom. 412

ii. Moro Vishwanath v. Ganesh Vithal (1873) 10 Bom. 444
iii. Muhammad Husain Khan v. Babu Kishva Nandan Sahai, AIR 1937 PC 233
iv. C.N. Arunachala Mudaliar v. C.A. Muruganatha Mudaliar, AIR 1953 SC 495

6TH SEPTEMBER TUESDAY (ONE HOUR) Classical Hindu Law of Succession

i. Family Law Lectures, Family Law– II, Poonam Pradhan Saxena, (2nd ed., 2007)
ii. The Importance Of Mitakshara In The 21st Century
iii. Family Law I & II, Poonam Pradhan Saxena, Halsbury’s Law’s of India, Vol. 10, 26 & 28
LexisNexis Butterworth Publications. .
iv. "Some Suggestions for the Amendment of the Indian Succession Act", 1962 (2) Supreme
Court Journal 62.
 v. "Shares to Female Members at a Partition under Mitakshara Law", 5 Journal of the
Indian Law Institute, 270 (1963).

8TH SEPTEMBER THURSDAY (ONE HOUR) Hindu Undivided Family/ Hindu

Joint Family

i. The Supreme Court and HUF: A Foot Note by Derrett, 1978 JILI 463- 470.
ii. Family Law Lectures, Family Law– II, Poonam Pradhan Saxena, (2nd ed., 2007)
iii. Does Remuneration of a Coparcener constitute a Joint Family Income? 28 Journal of
Indian Law Institute 385 (1986).

12TH SEPTEMBER MONDAY (TWO HOUR) Discussion & Class Participation

i. Dharmendra Kumar v. Usha Kumar, AIR 1977 SC 2213

ii. T. Srinivasan v. T. Varalakshmi, 1 (1991) DMC 20 ( Mad.)
iii. Hirachand Srinivas Managaonkar v. Sunanda, AIR 2001 SC 1285
iv. Sureshta Devi v. Om Prakash, 1 (1991) DMC 313 (SC)

13TH SEPTEMBER TUESDAY (ONE HOUR) Karta

i. Family Law Lectures, Family Law– II, Poonam Pradhan Saxena, (2nd ed., 2007)
ii. Partition of Joint Hindu Family by Sivaramayya, 1986 JILI 226-228

15TH SEPTEMBER THURSDAY (ONE HOUR) Property

i. Family Law Lectures, Family Law– II, Poonam Pradhan Saxena, (2nd ed., 2007)
ii. Protection on unjust enrichments and undeserved misery as essence of property right
jurisprudence in Mitakshara by P.Iswar Bhat, 2006 JILI 155-174
iii. Toward Gender Just Property Law by Kusum, 2005 JILI 95-101.
19TH SEPTEMBER MONDAY (TWO HOUR) Discussion & Class Participation

i. Smt. Dipo v. Wassan Singh, AIR 1983 SC 846

ii. Commissioner of Wealth-tax v. Chander Sen, AIR 1986 SC 1753
iii. Gurupad Khandappa Magdum v. Hirabai Khandappa Magdum, AIR 1978 SC 1239
iv. Vellikannu v. R. Singaperumal (2005) 6 SCC 622

20TH SEPTEMBER TUESDAY (ONE HOUR) Womens Rights to property

i. Womens Property Right Under the Traditional Hindu Law by Prakash Chand Jain, 2003 JILI
509-536.
ii. Family Law Lectures, Family Law– II, Poonam Pradhan Saxena, (2nd ed., 2007)
iii. "Mother's Share at a Partition under Mitakshara Law", All India Reporter 67 (J) (1963).
iv. Women's Rights of Inheritance in India (1973, Madras Law Journal, Madras).
 v. “Reinforcing Patriarchal Dictates through Judicial Mechanism”, by Poonam Saxena,
2009 JILI 221-236.

22ND SEPTEMBER THURSDAY (ONE HOUR) Hindu Succession Act, 1956

iv. Family Law Lectures, Family Law– II, Poonam Pradhan Saxena, (2nd ed., 2007)
v. Status of Women Under Hindu Succession Act, 1956 by Suman Gupta, 2007 AIR (J) 65-72.

26TH SEPTEMBER MONDAY (TWO HOUR) Discussion & Class Participation

i. S. Narayanan v. Meenakshi, AIR 2006 Ker. 143

ii. Vaddeboyina Tulasamma v. Vaddeboyina Sesha Reddi, AIR 1977 SC 1944
iii. Bhagat Singh v Teja Singh, AIR 2002 SC 1
iv. Radhika Devi v Rajesh Kumar, AIR 2009 Pat 109

27TH SEPTEMBER TUESDAY (ONE HOUR) HOLIDAY

29TH SEPTEMBER THURSDAY (ONE HOUR) Muslim Gift & Will

i. Mulla, Principles of Mahomedan Law M. Hidayatullah and Arshad Hidayatullah,(19th ed., 2008)
at 112-142.

NOVEMBER
7TH NOVEMBER MONDAY (TWO HOUR) Mohammedan Law in different
Parts of India

i. Mohammedan Law in Pondicherry By David Annoussamy 2002 JILI 315-335.

8TH NOVEMBER TUESDAY (ONE HOUR) Muslim Law of Succession

i. Family Law Lectulres, Family Law– II, Poonam Pradhan Saxena, (2nd ed., 2007)
ii. Mulla, Principles of Mahomedan Law M. Hidayatullah and Arshad Hidayatullah,(19th ed., 2008)
at 36-46.

10TH NOVEMBER THURSDAY (ONE HOUR) Muslim Law of Succession (cont..)

vi. Family Law Lectures, Family Law– II, Poonam Pradhan Saxena, (2nd ed., 2007)
vii. Mulla, Principles of Mahomedan Law M. Hidayatullah and Arshad Hidayatullah,(19th ed., 2008)
at 47- 50.

14TH NOVEMBER MONDAY (TWO HOUR) Discussion & Class Participation

i. Om Prakash v Radha Charan

 ii. Githa Hariharan v. Reserve Bank of India (1999) 2 SCC 228

15TH NOVEMBER TUESDAY (ONE HOUR) Minority and Guardianship

i. The Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956

ii. Githa Hariharan v. Reserve Bank of India (1999) 2 SCC 228
iii. Mayne’s Treatise on Hindu Law & Usage, Ranganath Misra, (15th ed., 2006)

17TH NOVEMBER THURSDAY (ONE HOUR) Adoption

i. Javid v State of Maharastra, AIR 2002 Bom 1.

21ST NOVEMBER MONDAY (TWO HOUR) Discussion & Class Participation

22ND NOVEMBER TUESDAY (ONE HOUR) Discussion & Class Participation

11.Abu Salem Abdul Qayoom Ansari vs . State of Maharashtra and Anr . ( 10 Add to session
. 09 . 2010 - SC ) list
 ......25(1B), 26, 29 and 35; Explosive Substances Act, 1908 - Sections 3, 4, 5 and 6; Explosives Act,
1884 - Sections 9B and 9B(1...8), 222, 299, 432 and 433; Explosive Substances Act, 1998 - Sections
3......

Equivalent Citation: Equivalent Citation: 2010(58)BLJR1353, JT2010(10)SC202, 2010(9)UJ4341(SC)

12.Perla Somasekhara Reddy and Ors . vs . State of A . P . rep . by Public Add to session
Prosecutor ( 06 . 05 . 2009 - SC ) list

......Mentioned IN Acts/Rules/Orders: Explosive Substances Act, 1908 - Sections 3, 5 and...307 IPC as

also under Sections 3 and 5 of Explosive Substances Act, 1908 (in short the `Explosive Act'). They
were acquitted of the rest......

Equivalent Citation: Equivalent Citation: 2010(1)ALD(Cri)612, JT2009(8)SC105, 2009(7)SCALE115,

(2009)16SCC98, [2009]8SCR145

Cited in Manupatra(3+)

13.Manjit Singh @ Mange vs . CBI , through its S . P . ( 25 . 01 . 2011 - SC ) Add to session

list

......Establishment Act, 1946 - Section 3; Explosives Act; Indian Penal Code - Sections...in the smuggling
of RDX, weapons and explosives used in the Bombay Bomb Blasts...information regarding smuggling of
arms and explosives used in the Bombay bomb blasts......

Equivalent Citation: Equivalent Citation: AIR2011SC806, 2011(2)KCCRSN113,

2011(1)RCR(Criminal)765, 2011(1)SCALE766, 2011(1)UJ475(SC)

14.Mustaq Ahmed Mohammed Isak and Ors . vs . State of Maharashtra ( 08 Add to session
. 05 . 2009 - SC ) list

......7), 20(8) and 20(9); Explosive Substances Act, 1908 - Sections 4 and...Penal Code - Section 120B;
Indian Explosive Act, 1884 - Sections 5, 6, 9 and 9B...120B of IPC r.w. Section 4, 5 of Explosive
Substances Act, 1908 r.w. 5, 6......

Equivalent Citation: Equivalent Citation: AIR2009SC2772, 2009CriLJ3952, JT2009(8)SC250,

2009(8)SCALE642, (2009)7SCC480, [2009]8SCR465

Cited in Manupatra(1+)

15.Pulin Das @ Panna Koch vs . State of Assam ( 22 . 02 . 2008 - SC ) Add to session

 list

......Act; Indian Penal Code; Explosive Substances Act; Criminal Procedure...thing by using bombs,
dynamite or other explosive substances or inflammable...the Indian Penal Code, Arms Act and
Explosive Substances Act; (2) There......

Equivalent Citation: Equivalent Citation: 2008(56)BLJR1201, 2008CriLJ2070, 2009(2)GLT9,

JT2008(2)SC574, 2008(2)SCALE729, (2008)5SCC89

Cited in Manupatra(1+)

16.Shaukat Hussain Guru vs . State ( NCT ) Delhi and Anr . ( 14 . 05 . 2008 - Add to session
SC ) list

......130, 299, 300, 302 and 307; Explosive Substances Act; Criminal...the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and
the Explosive Substances Act: i) Section...with 120B of IPC xi) Section 3 of Explosive Substances Act.
......

Equivalent Citation: Equivalent Citation: AIR2008SC2419, 2008CriLJ3016, 2008(7)SCALE525,

(2008)6SCC776

17.State of Orissa vs . Sikhar Jena and Ors . ( 01 . 12 . 2008 - SC ) Add to session

list

......IN Acts/Rules/Orders: Indian Explosives Act - Section 9; Indian Penal Code...years and under
Section 9(b) of the Indian Explosives Act, (in short `Explosive Act') read with Section 149 IPC and
sentenced......

Equivalent Citation: Equivalent Citation: AIR2009SC1039, 2009CriLJ980, JT2009(1)SC421,

(2008)15SCC187

18.Jagdish vs . State of M . P . ( 18 . 09 . 2009 - SC ) Add to session

list

......Words Mentioned IN Acts/Rules/Orders: Explosive Substances Act - Section 5; Indian Penal Code -
Sections...The sentences under Section 148, IPC and Section 5 of the Explosive Substances Act and
under Section 302, IPC, shall run concurrently......

Equivalent Citation: Equivalent Citation: 2010(1)ALD(Cri)277, 2009(57)BLJR3095, 2010(1)JLJ135(SC),

JT2009(12)SC300, 2009(12)SCALE580, [2009]14SCR727, 2009(9)UJ4499(SC)
19.Somon vs . State of Kerala ( 24 . 10 . 2008 - SC ) Add to session
list

......Words Mentioned IN Acts/Rules/Orders: Explosive Substances Act, 1908 - Sections 3 and 5;

Indian...IPC). They were also charged under Sections 3 and 5 of the Explosive Substances Act, 1908.
The Judicial Magistrate, Ranni......

Equivalent Citation: Equivalent Citation: ILR2008(4)Kerala747, JT2008(11)SC579

20.Ganesh Gogoi vs . State of Assam ( 07 . 07 . 2009 - SC ) Add to session

list

......people does any act or thing by using bombs, dynamite or other explosive substances or
inflammable substances or fire- arms...or things by using (a) bombs or dynamite, or (b) other explosive
substances, or (c) inflammable substances, or......

Equivalent Citation: Equivalent Citation: 2009(2)ACR2358(SC), AIR2009SC2955, 2009(57)BLJR2101,

JT2009(9)SC59, RLW2010(1)SC145, 2009(9)SCALE135, (2009)7SCC404, [2009]9SCR1209,
2009(7)UJ3284(SC)

Cited in Manupatra(3+)

21.Noorul Huda Maqbool Ahmed vs . Ram Deo Tyagi and Ors . ( 04 . 07 . Add to session
2011 - SC ) list

......building, Shri Lalit pointed out that if even under that explosive situation the police personnel did
not use weapon and...concerned area. The situation grew extremely volatile and explosive, particularly,
in the areas of the four......

22.M . Mohan vs . The State represented by The Deputy Superintendent of Add to session
Police ( 01 . 03 . 2011 - SC ) list

...... V.P. Shrivastava v. Indian Explosives Limited and Ors. (2010) 10 SCC... V.P. Shrivastava v. Indian
Explosives Limited and Ors. Discussed...In V.P. Shrivastava v. Indian Explosives Limited and Ors.
(2010) 10 SCC......

Equivalent Citation: Equivalent Citation: 2011(1)ACR965(SC), AIR2011SC1238, 2011CriLJ1900,

2011(2)JCC1078, JT2011(3)SC32, 2011(2)RCR(Criminal)272, 2011(3)SCALE78, (2011)3SCC626

23.Zameer Ahmed Latifur Rehman Sheikh vs . State of Maharashtra and Ors Add to session
. ( 23 . 04 . 2010 - SC ) list
 ......country, does any act by using bombs, dynamite or other explosive substances or inflammable
substances or firearms or...country,- (a) by using bombs, dynamite or other explosive substances or
inflammable substances or firearms or other......

Equivalent Citation: Equivalent Citation: AIR2010SC2633, JT2010(4)SC256, 2010(4)SCALE276,

[2010]4SCR1042

Cited in Manupatra(1+)

24.Mohd . Ayub Dar vs . State of J and K ( 21 . 07 . 2010 - SC ) Add to session

list

......prosecution urged that appellant Mohd Ayub Dar @ Ishfaq had visited Pakistan, where he was trained
in the handling of firearms and explosives. He was involved in a number of other terrorists' cases and
was arrested in Delhi by the Delhi Police on 6.5.1991......

Equivalent Citation: Equivalent Citation: 2011(1)ACR184(SC), AIR2010SC2864, 2011 1

AWC(Supp)2.21SC, 2010(58)BLJR980, 2010CriLJ4389, JT2010(8)SC459, (2010)9SCC312,
[2010]8SCR916, 2010(7)UJ3398(SC)

25.Rajesh Kumar and Anr . vs . State Govt . of NCT of Delhi ( 25 . 02 . 2008 Add to session
- SC ) list

...... (a) any Chemical Examiner or Assistant Chemical Examiner to Government; (b) the Chief Controller
of Explosives; (c) the Director of the Finger Print Bureau; (d) the Director, Haffkeine Institute, Bombay;
......

Equivalent Citation: Equivalent Citation: 2008(2)ACR1646(SC), JT2008(3)SC330, 2008(1)KLT985(SC),

2008(3)SCALE87, (2008)4SCC493

26.Prabhu vs . State of Madhya Pradesh ( 03 . 12 . 2008 - SC ) Add to session

list

......used as a weapon of offence, is likely to cause death, or by means of fire or any corrosive substance,
or by means of any explosive substance, or by means of any substance which is deleterious to the
human body to inhale, to swallow, or to receive......

Equivalent Citation: Equivalent Citation: 2009(1)ACR54(SC), AIR2009SC745, 2009(1)ALD(Cri)674,

JT2008(13)SC72

27.George Pon Paul vs . Kanagalet and Ors . ( 29 . 04 . 2009 - SC ) Add to session

 list

......death, or by means of fire or any heated substance, or by means of any poison or any corrosive
substance, or by means of any explosive substance, or by means of any substance which it is deleterious
to the human body to inhale, to swallow, or to receive......

Equivalent Citation: Equivalent Citation: JT2009(14)SC155, 2009(7)SCALE672, (2009)13SCC478,

[2009]7SCR330