EIC PRODUCT CENTER

The restoration of old buildings in major cities in the world costs enormous
government expenditure. This money should be used in new housing and road
development. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

By Timothy Williams

Old buildings and ancient artefacts are an integral part of a nation’s heritage and
culture. The preservation of such structures is essential to preserving and
elucidating the history of a country. Without a sense of history, a nation is unable
to learn from the mistakes and achievements of the past. In that sense, it is vital
that governments take steps to allocate sufficient funds for their preservation.

Some would argue that in certain countries governments should prioritise other
spending commitments, with health, education and other public services
ear-marked as more essential. Undoubtedly, in the developing world, with
millions of people still living in abject poverty, governments face a stark choice
between helping the citizens of today and preserving elements of its history. It is
often difficult to make such choices, especially in situations where civil unrest or
public pressure are at risk of escalating.

Nonetheless, it is clear to me that a country that fails to adequately protect its

cultural and historical heritage fails to strengthen its moral and ethical values.
Historic buildings are not simply bricks and mortar; they are a symbol of the
traditional values and principles of the people of the nation. To that end,
government expenditure on the preservation of old buildings is an investment in
the moral principles of the people.

Thus, in conclusion, I have no doubt that government expenditure should be

directed unequivocally towards the upkeep of historic buildings. However, in
certain economic circumstances, it may be necessary for governments to
prioritise other areas of investment for the benefit of its citizens.