PART III: SUMMARY OF RATINGS FOR DISCUSSION

Ratin Adjectival
Final Performance results
g Rating
Accomplishments of KRAs and Objectives     4.388 VS

Rater- Rate Agreement

The signatures below confirm that the employee and his/her superior have agreed on content of this appraisal form and the performance rating.

Name of Employee VENUS T. CAALEM Name of Superior CENON C. CALAOR  

Signatur
e       Signature      

                 

PART IV: DEVELOPMENTAL PLANS

Action Plan
Resources
Strengths Developmental Needs (Recommended Developmental Timeline
Needed
Intervention)
A. FUNCTIONAL COMPETENCIES
OBJECTIVE 3 KRA 1 OBJECTIVE 10 KRA 4 Coaching and Mentoring with subject
Semi-annual
Applied a range of teaching strategies to Developed summative tests: (a) with coordinators especially on new subjects taught in
(during INSET
Test Materials
develop critical and creative thinking, as TOS reviewed by superior; (b) with SHS since learning and teaching materials are
and during LAC
well as other higher order thinking skills. sample accomplished still lacking From Division or
Sessions)
questionnaire/answer sheets LRMDS
Year Round
Develop complete summative tests with TOS and Textbooks and
 complete test files on test banks on different
subject areas.

Acquire related test materials from Division

Learning
Coordinators or LRMDS and other sources
Materials

B.  CORE BEHAVIORAL COMPETENCIES
 Professionalism and ethics
 Service orientation
 Teamwork
 Result focus
Internet
Develop capacity building skills, Purchase reading materials and professional
modernize and upgrade strategies guidelines. Personal and
based on learners need. Connect with valuable and effective authors and Local School
speakers to enlarge sphere of knowledge and All Year Round Funds
Coordinate with fellow mentors for wisdom.
positive feedback and planning.
Attend INSET and Seminars
More teacher-student time and
interaction to follow up learning with
desirable habits and application.

VENUS T. CAALEM CENON C. CALAOR CENON C. CALAOR

Teacher II Principal II (Approving Authority)
(Ratee) Rater
 PART III: SUMMARY OF RATINGS FOR DISCUSSION

Adjectival
Final Performance results Rating
Rating
Accomplishments of KRAs and Objectives    

Rater- Rate Agreement

 The signatures below confirm that the employee and his/her superior have agreed on content of this appraisal form and the performance rating.

Name of Employee JOSELITO P . ESTRIBO Name of Superior CENON C. CALAOR  

Signatur
e       Signature      

                 

PART IV: DEVELOPMENTAL PLANS

Action Plan
Resources
Strengths Developmental Needs (Recommended Developmental Intervention) Timeline
Needed

C. FUNCTIONAL COMPETENCIES
OBJECTIVE 3 KRA 1: OBJECTIVE 3 KRA 3Developed and used Coaching and Mentoring with the ICT Coordinator Semi-annual Laptop
Used different teaching strategies that develop varied teaching and learning resources (during INSET)
critical and creative thinking and/or other including ICT Attend ICT literacy courses Year round Local funds
HOTS (any available time
within a year)
D.  CORE BEHAVIORAL COMPETENCIES
 Professionalism and ethics Innovation specially in designing and Participate in INSET to gain more knowledge in using Semi-annual Local Funds
 Service orientation conceptualizing of learners materials ICT. (during INSET)
 Teamwork using ICT
 Result focus

JOSELITO P. ESTRIBO CENON C. CALAOR CENON C. CALAOR

Teacher III Principal II (Approving Authority)
(Ratee) Rater