Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Commerce
Ramaiah University of Applied
Sciences
Mark
First s
Sections
Marking Moderato
Examine
Scheme r
MarksMax
r Marks
Group Task Marks
A.1MAANAV20
Part-A Max Marks20
Part A
Instructions to Students:
Maanav Project
1. Written Report
2. PPT/Charts/Model/Street Play/Short Movie
Note:
The assignment will have to be submitted on the date specified.
There can be no last minute changes
Groups will made by the Course Leader
Name of the Student Registration number
1) Sabith H 19MCMS047082
3) Sanjana M 19MCMS047087
4) Shashank S 19MCMS047092
6) Soubhagya L M 19MCMS047097
8) Sunayana R 19MCMS047099
9) Supritha k 19MCMS047101
1) FEMALE INFANTICIDE
"Female infanticide is the intentional killing of baby girls due to the preference for male
babies and from the low value associated with the birth of females."
As per the decennial Indian census, Sex Ratio of India is 107.48. It means 107.48 males per
100 females in 2019. Therefore, India has 930 females per 1000 males. So, India has 48.20%
female population compare to 51.80% male population
Key Facts:
2) DOMESTIC VIOLENCE
A married woman who was leaving with her husband and with her husband’s aunt
was quite happy at her husband’s house at her early stage of marriage. After 2 years
of her marriage she got pregnant. When she got pregnant, she started getting
problems at her house from her husband and husband’s aunt. Her husband used to
listen to his aunt and was giving problems to her. He used to hit her very badly and
abuse her. She was pregnant and they used to never care for her and the baby which
was in her womb. He used to throw her out of the gate and hit her in front of all the
people in the area. Hitting her and throwing her out of the house continued. And
they stopped giving her food too. The women’s parents gave compliant to the police
station but never worked out it continued the same. The reason behind this was that
her husband’s aunt never liked her and she wanted him to marry her daughter. She
slept outside the house for continues for 2 days without entering the house. After all
this her parents were like it is your husband’s home and you should be there listening
to them. This continued for a long time and she left her husband’s house. And after 3
years she got married to another person, and that person accepted her daughter too
3) DOWRY
Case of RAJA:
When she was 13 her mother decided to marry her off to an 18 years old boy to pay
her father’s gambling debts. After the marriage the husband and both the in laws
would constantly abuse her, beating her and treating her like a slave because they
thought the dowry received wasn’t enough. She reported the abuse to the police
several time before her case got taken into consideration. After a few years she was
able to go back to her parents’ home. She is 18 now and she is getting her driver
license. She wants to be the first woman auto driver in Bhopal.
4) ACID ATTACK
Laxmi was attacked in Delhi’s Khan Market in 2005 by her acquaintances, Guddu and
Rakhi. Laxmi was 15 at that time and the act was seen as a revenge for Laxmi’s refusal
to marry Guddu, her friend’s brother. People, especially women, would taunt her, call
her names, and even speak ill about her and family. They questioned her upbringing
and faulted her for the attack. But the support from her parents gave Laxmi the
courage to move ahead with the multiple surgeries she needed. While she was aware
of the physical deformities caused by the acid attack, little was she prepared for the
face that stared back in the mirror 100 days after the incident.
Laxmi was so traumatised that she contemplated suicide. But thinking of the pain she
would cause her parents, she decided to end such thoughts. Instead, Laxmi chose to
confide in her parents, who encouraged her to seek counselling. Simultaneously, she
also decided to take her case to the court, and the trial went on for four years. The
result: Guddu was sentenced to 10 years in jail, and Rakhi was imprisoned for seven
years. But before all this, Laxmi languished under the mental and physical toll of the
attack. For months, she was unable to wear any clothes and would stay under a
blanket. Managing menstrual hygiene, when even a thin strip of cloth weighed her
bruised body down, was an additional cross for Laxmi to bear. Laxmi’s seven
surgeries took place over the course of seven years and cost around Rs 20 lakh. Her
father’s savings and his employer at that time helped the family bear the cost
financially.
Emerging from her dark days:
But change was afoot for Laxmi, who refused to be enslaved by the injustice meted
out to her. Slowly, with her parents’ support, she gained confidence and decided to
start her diploma in vocational training at the National Institute of Open Schooling,
Delhi. And in 2009, another big change happened. This move was met with a lot of
resistance from her community and girls in her institution, but Laxmi was unfazed.
With the support of her teacher and the institution, Laxmi completed her diploma.
5) CHILD MARRIAGE
Child marriage in India is one of the most baffling of all problems which the Indian
society faces. There was a time when most children were married at a very premature
age. There have been several instances wherein children less than 10 years of age got
married. They barely understood the meaning of marriage and yet they were tied to a
bond they could do nothing about.
Child Marriage in India is a centuries old tradition. When the 1921 census reported 600
brides in the age group of one to twelve months, Mahatma Gandhi was shocked. He
became instrumental in introducing the Sarda Act or the Child Marriage Restraint Act in
1929. That was the first step taken against child marriage in India. It fixed the age of
marriage for girls at 14 years and boys at 18 years. Since then many reformers and
stakeholders have been advocating against child marriage in India.
Mrs. Manga, resident of village Dammannapet, belongs to Backward Class (BC). She
was married at the age of l0 years, (when she was in 4th class) along with her two
elder sisters due to pressure of grandparents. According to her early marriage is
prevalent in her caste and her husband was performed at age of 13 years and after
one year she delivered a child. Now she is 21years and mother of three girl children.
She has been pressurized by her husband and in-laws to bear a male child. She is
neither able to oppose her family nor convince them she does not want more
children. She added she was unaware and had no knowledge of getting pregnant at
the first time. She told that “I was very keen to study but early marriage and-
husband snatched this opportunity from me”. She lost her adolescence and chance to
over development of herself. Many times, she was subject to harassment physically
and mentally by her in-laws and her husband to give them male child, some time
being scolded and beaten up.
6) ABORTION
Abortion, the expulsion of a fetus from the uterus before it has reached the stage of
viability (in human beings, usually about the 20th week of gestation). An abortion may
occur spontaneously, in which case it is also called a miscarriage, or it may be brought
on purposefully, in which case it is often called an induced abortion.
Tapasya Umesh Pisal, aged 24 years, has approached this Court under Article
32 of the Constitution of India seeking directions to the respondents to allow
her to undergo medical termination of her pregnancy. She apprehended
danger to her life, having discovered that her fetus was diagnosed with
tricuspid and pulmonary atresia, a cardiac anomaly in the fetus.
The aforesaid Medical Board has examined the petitioner and stated that as
on 07.08.2017, she was into her 24th week of pregnancy. She was
accompanied by her husband and they are aware of the cardiac anomaly and
the associated morbidity of the baby if born alive. The salient features of the
said report are as under :
The fetus is diagnosed as having hypo plastic right heart with tricuspid and
pulmonary atresia with small size pulmonary arteries.
The surgeries that will be necessary on the fetus have been reported to
carry high morbidity and mortality.
We also have on record the opinion of an eminent surgeon Dr. Devi Shetty of
Bangalore who has stated that most of these children do not live till the adult
life. Their life is precarious because of the problems resulting from low
oxygenation in the body.
But for the time period, it appears that the case falls under section 3(2)(b) of
the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971, which reads as under:
“3.When pregnancies may be terminated by registered medical practitioners.-
(1).... (2)(b) Where the length of the pregnancy exceeds twelve weeks but does
not exceed twenty weeks, if not less than two registered medical practitioners
are, of opinion, formed in good faith, that -
(i) The continuance of the pregnancy would involve a risk to the life of the
pregnant woman or of grave injury to her physical or mental health; or
(ii) There is a substantial risk that if the child were born, it would suffer
from such physical or mental abnormalities as to be seriously
handicapped.” In these circumstances, it is difficult for us to refuse the
permission to the petitioner to undergo medical termination of
pregnancy. It is certain that the fetus if allowed to born, would have a
limited life span with serious handicaps which cannot be avoided. It
appears that the baby will certainly not grow into an adult.
7) WOMEN TRAFFICKING
Women trafficking in India, although illegal under Indian law, remain a significant
problem. People are frequently illegally trafficked through India for the purposes of
commercial sexual exploitation. Women are trafficked in India for diverse reasons.
Women and girls are trafficked within the country for the purposes of commercial
sexual exploitation and forced marriage, especially in those areas where the sex ratio is
highly skewed in favour of men. India is also a destination for women and girls from
Nepal and Bangladesh trafficked for the purpose of commercial sexual exploitation.
Indian women are trafficked to the Middle East for commercial sexual exploitation.
Human trafficking in India results in women suffering from both mental and physical
issues. Mental issues include disorders such as PTSD, depression and anxiety. The lack
of control women has in trafficking increases their risk of suffering from mental
disorders. Women who are forced into trafficking are at a higher risk for HIV, TB, and
other STDs. Condoms are rarely used and therefore there is a higher risk for victims to
suffer from an STD.
When she was 22 years old, Luiza Karimova left her home in Uzbekistan and
travelled to Osh, Kyrgyzstan with the hopes of finding work. However, without a
Kyrgyz ID or university degree, Karimova struggled to find employment. When a
woman offered her a waitressing job in Bishkek, the capital city in the north of
Kyrgyzstan, she welcomed the opportunity.
But things took a turn for the worse after arriving in Bishkek. Karimova recalls that,
“They held us in an apartment and took away our passports. They told us that we’d
be photographed again for our new employment documents, to be registered as
waitresses. It felt strange, but we believed them.”
Then, Karimova and the other women were put on a plane to Dubai, handed fake
passports instead of their real ones, and shepherded to an apartment after landing.
“We were to be sex slaves and do whatever the clients wanted. The next day I was
sent to a nightclub and told that I would have to earn at least 10,000 USD by the end
of the month,” says Karimova.
For 18 months, her life was consumed by the nightclub work. Upon leaving the club
one evening, Karimova saw a police car approaching, and instead of running away,
she stayed to let the police arrest her.
“I was deported back to Osh, and since my ID was fake, I spent a year in jail. I filed a
police report, and three of the traffickers were captured”.
However, after being released from prison, Karimova was left to live on the streets,
ashamed and unemployed. She went back to work in the sex industry until she was
approached by Podruga, an organization that assists women subjected to sex and
drug trafficking. “They offered me work. I wasn’t sure that I would fit in, but slowly I
began to trust them,” she says.
Now, Karimova works to prevent the exact situation in which she found herself. As
an outreach worker with Podruga, she visits saunas and other places where sex
workers may be. “I often meet girls who dream of going to Turkey and Dubai, to earn
more. I tell them, ‘please don’t go...There is nothing good for you there.’”
To prevent their futures from unfolding as hers did, Karimova provides the women
with health and safety resources and information about legal aid. “To stop trafficking
of women and girls, we have to inform people about the full consequences of human
trafficking and how to detect the signs. It is critical to start raising awareness about
this in schools, starting young, so that they do not become victims.”
8) SEXUAL HARASSMENT
This is famously known as “The Butt Slapping Case”. This was one of the most
criticised high profiled cases. The last decision came in 2005 which ultimately reduce
the punishment to probation. An opinion can be formed from this case about the
lenient judicial procedure towards the high elites of the society.
Rupal Deol Bajaj was an IAS Officer belonging to Punjab Cadre. She lodged a FIR
against Mr.KPS Gill the Director General of Police u/s 341,342.352,354 and 509 of IPC.
On the said date, in the party of KPS Gill the accused around 10.pm walked across a
group of ladies and joined them. After sometime some of the ladies started leaving
and going into the house. The victim didn’t notice that Mr.KPS Gill was misbehaving
with them.
KPS Gill then called the victim to talk about something. On realisation by victim a out
of order behaviour by Gill, she avoided going. After a while Gill reached out to her
amongst the other ladies who were sitting together and ordered her in an obnoxious
manner to get up and come along. She resisted and turned back and started leaving,
when he slapped her back.
Judgement:
In 1998 the High Court of Punjab and Haryana Gill booked Gill u/s 354 i.e.
outraging modesty of a women and u/s 509 i.e. an act, word, gesture intended to
insult a lady.
He was sentenced for rigorous imprisonment for 3months and simple
imprisonment for 2months along with fine of Rs.200000.
Appeals were made into Supreme Court of India wherein the punishment was
turned into probation in 2005.
9) INEQUALITY
Rape is a type of sexual assault usually involving sexual intercourse or other forms of
sexual penetration carried out against a person without that person's consent.
Summary:-
In a country like India where a woman is treated to be no less than a goddess but why doesn’t it
reflect in the actions of people in our country?
As an hypocrisy of the above state the 4th highest crime in india is rape. Rape one of the most
frequent crimes against women. Sometimes it is a stranger who is just attacking the random female
but most of the time it's a person who is known like a friend, family, colleague or a well known
relative.
Even after all that been discussed the justice in india towards these assaulted victims come late or
sometimes they have to fight a war to get the justice which was theirs from the beginning for
becoming the innocent victim of this horrendous sexual assault.
Dr. Priyanka Reddy a 27 year old veterian doctor from shamshabad in hyderabad was a native of
Telangana. On 27 November that fateful night when she was returning from hospital after her
duty.She was working in Kollur village near Shadnagar in Hyderabad she had been working there for
about an year. She was brutally raped and burned her to death. The accused are 4 men who
according to police already pre-planned this crime. The Police found this body the next day half-
burnt below the underpass 30 km away from shadnagar. According to the investigation the accused
forced the victime to drink alcohol before raping her. After dragging her to an isolated open plot
where they forced her for a soft drink spiked with alcohol in terms of getting her unconscious. They
repeatedly raped her one by one.
The sad truth is the prime suspect (Areef) offered her help with her flat tire. The other suspect ( Jollu
shiva) had taken the scooter to the repair shop, however he returned saying all shops are closed. She
called her sister when she was scared and felt the things were suspicious. Later her phone was
switched off. The accused dragged in the victim 15 meters into an open plot where her screams
were unheard. They raped her repeatedly one by one. The accused held her legs, the other gagged
and smothered killing her on spot. Later they removed the number plate and threw the body in the
back of the truck. While the other two followed the scooter. They dumped her body in chatanpally
they got petrol in an empty bottle from kothur.the accused wrapped the body in a blanket and they
set the body on fire. Later the other two accused (shiva and naveen) returned to ensure the ashes of
the body. The more brutal facts came out after the interrogation that the accused where
continuously raping the dead body in the back of the lorry.
There are a few parameters to be blamed in the whole case. Family of the victims and reporters
accused the police for taking the actions late when they informed them that her phone went off
after informing her sister that she was scared to be with some strangers. The police asked the family
to go from one station to another.
Next morning a milkman found the body. Later police came to get the charred body and family
recognised from the scarf,bunkle and a ganesha locket.
On 29 Nov 2019, Police had traced the four criminals involved in the brutal rape. The prime suspect
was Mohammed pasha who was a lorry driver. The others( j shiva, j naveen & chenna) were all 20
year old cleaners . All were the residents of Narayanpet district.
There was a huge public outrage especially after the Nirbhaya case. Public wanted the accused to be
hanged to give justice to the 27 year old priyanka reddy. On 6 Dec 2019 the nation awoke the news
of the 4 accused being encountered when they tried to flee while they were being taken to the
murder site. On 6 dec 2019 around 3 am the Cyberabad police shot dead all the four suspects on 4
highway the veterinarian's rape and murder case. The police had taken the accused to recreation of
the crime scene. While trying to enact the scene again the accused tried stoning the cops and after
several warnings to surrender they tried escaping and the cops had no choice but the encounter the
criminals on the spot.
II CASE LAWS WITH LOOPHOLES AND SOLUTIONS
This case is about the girl being brutally raped and murdered 8 years ago and the justice
knocked at her door too late not until 20 March 2020. This reveals a lot about the justice
towards females in india. India has set an example every 15 minutes of having a woman
being raped. It is high time this is to be discussed why it took so long for the justice to be
served and what exactly happened that fateful evening with Nirbhaya.
A 23 year old physiotherapy student, Jyothi Singh was travelling with a male friend on 16th
December 2012 with a male friend in a private bus that fateful evening where she was
raped by the six other passengers present in the bus while the driver was driving throughout
delhi while this brutal assault was happening to the innocent victim. While her friend was
injured badly in terms not to take any actions against them on the crime scene. she was in
so much pain that it took her life after two days when she was transferred to the hospital in
Singapore after 11 days of the assault.
The case of Nirbhaya not only bought awareness among women about the resistance of
rape but took the life of the victim in terms to realise the criticality of the situation in our
country. The accused where Ram singh a bus driver who hanged himself in tihar jail but the
defense & family claims it to be a murder. The rest of the five accused where one was Ram
singhs's brother Mukesh Singh was arrested in rajasthan. One of the accused was minor
Pawan Gupta, vinay sharma , akshay thakur. They were accused of Rape, murder, assualt
and robbery.
JUDGEMENT:-
● One of the major loophole for this convicts was Curative petition
● mercy petition which was filed one after another which left the judgement hanging
● The gap between the rejection of the mercy petition and date of execution was 14
days which led them to find the loopholes to escape the execution.
● Another aspect of nirbhaya case was the hanging to be carried on the same day or
the different days based on that the curative and mercy petition where filed.
Hanging is not the solution and the death of the convicts is not going to bring any change to
the life of the victim, said a few newspapers. What could be the justice to a woman who lost
her life struggling to death to escape from being tortured, Getting sexually abused, and
being assaulted. Who is to be blamed for the safety of women in our country? What is the
justice to a woman who is an innocent victim?. Anyways there were a few changes made
legally to support the victim.
● A committee was set to make some changes in law amendments within 30 days that
was called the justice verma committee.
● The Government of Karnataka announced the 24/7 helpline (1091) for future
precautions.
● The pending cases were taken into action faster to avoid the loopholes for the
convicts.
● The Government of Tamil Nadu also announced a 13 point action for the safety of
women and said that crime of sexual assault will be considered a grave crime.
● women prosecutors will be appointed as most of the cases in india are not filed due
to the fear of society and gender inequality.
● Jammu-kashmir also to the action to change the state laws on sexual assaults.
● Himachal Pradesh took actions to the crimes against womens to be dealt with by the
committee at district-level.
Loopholes:
The Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 is enacted to eradicate the practice of dowry, but the Act
has so many loopholes.
The Act was sought to be amended in 1986 with a view to checking the misuse of the
Act, introduced Sec.8-B which deals with appointment of Dowry Prohibition Officers
by State Govt. The punishment prescribed for demanding, taking and giving dowry
were very low. So the Act has been amended from time to time.
The major cause for failure of Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 is that an infringement of
the provision of the Act is not made a cognizable offence.
At present the offence is non-compoundable and so the wives framed in large no. of
cases or her family member simply for extracting money.
The Law commission recommended that the offence under sec. 498-A should be
made compoundable offence with the permission of the court.
The justice Malimath committee on criminal justice reform also recommended that it
should be made compoundable as well as bailable.
According to the opinion of the many people if offence will make compoundable it will
decrease the cases burden of the court. But I don’t think so that, the making offence
compoundable or non-compoundable makes any difference. The evil like dowry is deeply
rooted in the society it takes much time to eradicate this. At present this is the situation that
there are so many laws but not the specific or exact one which solve the problem properly.
Solutions:
Child marriage violates international human rights laws and standards, including Article
16(2) of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which requires the “free and full
consent” of spouses to marriage. It also violates Article 16 of the Convention on the
Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW), which requires
women and girls to have the “right freely to choose a spouse” and to “enter into
marriage only with their free and full consent.” CEDAW also states that the “betrothal
and the marriage of a child shall have no legal effect.” India is also signatory to the
Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC), and child marriage violates a range of CRC
provisions, including the right of children not to be separated from their parents against
their will and the right of children to freely express their views on matters that affect
them. Further, under the CRC, the state is obligated to take measures to abolish
traditional practices prejudicial to the health of children, including marriage.
The social forces at play perpetuating child marriage are difficult to combat, deep-
seated and intertwined as they are. But perhaps what is lesser known is that laws in
India prohibiting child marriage are flawed, contributing to the problem.
First, the Prohibition of Child Marriage Act, 2006 repealed the Child Marriage Restraint
Act, 1929 and attempted to address the previous Act’s shortcomings. This Act defined
child marriage as the marriage of boys under age 21 and girls under 18. The Act also
made positive changes, including extending the maximum length of punishment to two
years of imprisonment and/or a fine of up to one lakh rupees. If the marriage is
nullified, the Act requires the return of money, valuables, gifts, and ornaments given by
each party to the other, and also allows an order of maintenance for the former wife.
The Act also provides for government-appointed Child Marriage Prohibition Officers to
work to prevent child marriages; while good in theory, it is unclear whether they are
actually in operation and to what extent.
Notably, the Delhi High Court has held that the 2006 Act overrides personal law (Court
On Its Own Motion (Lajja … v. State) (2012)). Thus, even if child marriage is considered
acceptable in personal law, religious communities (in this jurisdiction, at least) are
required to adhere to the more stringent requirements of the 2006 Act, which allow
child marriages to be voidable at the option of the child entered into the marriage.
Despite this, it is worth emphasizing that the Act still failed to make all child marriages
automatically void, instead making them void only where the child is “taken or enticed”
from the care of a guardian, in cases of compulsion, fraud or trafficking, and if
performed in violation of an injunction. Erecting further barriers, the Act holds that a
child marriage is voidable only upon the filing of a petition for annulment in district
court. It is thus deeply problematic that the 2006 Act does not automatically declare
child marriages void, only making them voluntarily voidable. This gap led to a disturbing
judgment in May 2012, where the Delhi High Court held that a 15-year old girl, under
Muslim personal law, has the right to marry without the consent of her parents as long
as she has attained the age of puberty (Mrs. Tahra Begum v. State of Delhi And Ors,
(2012)). The High Court held that a child marriage is not automatically void under India’s
civil laws if entered into by the ‘choice’ of the girl, but that the marriage would be
voidable only at the option of the contracting party under the Prohibition of Child
Marriage Act, 2006. This loophole thus seems to allow child marriages to continue to be
legally valid, in violation of CEDAW.
Solutions:
By way of present writ petition filed in public interest under Article 32 of the
Constitution of India, the petitioner – a registered NGO seeks to highlight the plight of
the acid attack victims and the inadequacy how the compensation payable to the
victims as per the orders of the Apex Court in Laxmi vs. Union of India (in Writ Petition
(Crl.) No.129 of 2006). Petitioner also highlights the lack of a legal guarantee to free
medical care, rehabilitative services or adequate compensation under the Survivor
Compensation Schemes.
This case was filed by a NGO Parivartan Kendra in order to bring to notice the
predicament of the acid attack victims. It contains reference to Laxmi vs Union of India
case.
The four assailants attacked two dalit girls of Bihar with acid during midnight while they
were sleeping on their rooftops. They had also terrorized and harassed them and their
family before executing their acid attack. The victims were rushed to Patna Medical
College and Hospital where they were not given proper treatment on time. The
Government of Bihar gave a compensation of Rs.2,42,000 for the treatment of both the
victims. However, the family had already spent Rs. 5,00,000 on their treatment till the
filing. The acid attack victims have to go under multiple medical treatments and
surgeries which are very expensive. This case highlights the disparity in compensations
given to acid attack victims for their treatment, rehabilitation and restoration.
It also brings to notice the carelessness and irresponsibility on the path of hospitals
where the acid attack victims are taken for treatments. The victims were also
mistreated by the hospital and doctors on the grounds of their caste. This case also
points out the lack of standard procedures and treatment to be followed for the victims.
It also signifies the need to place stringent and strict regulations on the sale of acid and
other such corrosive substance. Furthermore, severe forms of punishments and fines
for the failure to follow the regulations..
LOOPHOLES:
The law commission of India in its 226 th report has asserted that the majority of acid attack
victims are women – “particularly young women for spurning suitors, for rejecting proposals
of marriage, for denying dowry etc. The attacker is not able to take the fact that he has been
rejected by the women and seeks to destroy the body of the women who has dare to stand
up to him. A renowned academician Afroza Anwari in his study emphasized that how acid is
used by men on women as a mark of their masculinity and superiority over women to keep
women in their place14. Acid is used as weapon to silence and control women by destroying
what is constructed as the primary constituent of her identity. Anwari in his study further
maintained that in patriarchal and conservative societies, overemphasis is laid on marriage
of a girl. Women have been limited to their virginity and fair complexion. Her romantic
relationship prior to her marriage is odious 15. When the girl turns down the proposal of
vengeful lovers for marriage or is rejected by the family of hers, they resort to acid attack.
There is also an economic aspect to acid attacks in view of globalization. The financial
independence of women in a society of unemployed men creates antagonism in them.
“Deteriorating economic conditions, high unemployment rates among male bread-winners,
the growing number of powerless households, and the absence of pastoral work for male
labourers” are the major reasons for their pique. Thus, women who are burdened with the
onus of earning for the family are often made victim of acid by their husbands and In-laws
when they fail to live up to their expectations as homemakers in their conservative sexual
roles. Property disputes are another cause for such violence on women. The motivation of
acid attacks on women can be attribute to various factors and feelings. Some men throw
acid on women in order to demean them, some do to show their superiority over the
women. Men want their everlasting control over women’s fate.
Study of Indian News Reports, from January 2002 to October 2012 uncovered that victim’s
rejection for love and marriage proposals motivate attacks in 35% of the different new
stories, providing an intention for the attack 16. Furthermore, leading organization working
for acid attack victims published another report. The Campaign and Struggle against Acid
Attacks on Women (CSAAAW) found that sexual harassment or assault in response to a
women or girl refusing such advances or demanding that the violence should stop often
precede such attacks. This shows the society’s outlook on the women. Women still cannot
fight for the rights which are in still in every person from their birth. In a patriarchal society
woman is guided by the males and cannot take her own decisions or make her own choices.
Women complexion her size is considered as the beauty of her which is why it gives much
pleasure for the men to throw acids on the women in order to destroy their body and
dreams. It comes from the thinking “If I can’t have you, nobody else would. Another reason
may be dowry problems or other marital problems. Though taking dowry is a punishable
offence, but still it is largely prevalent in many areas. It is considered as the duty of the
bride’s family, and has to suffer a huge social stigma if not complied with. In India, many
women have claim that they are attacked with acids due to failure to meet the monetary
expectations of them in laws. The study of the newspaper reports in India, exhibits nearly
20% of the attacks are occurred between unrelated people, due to business rivalry, sales
disputes, land quarrels or due to families reprisal.17.
However, whilst self-immolation or setting a woman on fire are considered by some as
upright, the transformation of these types of traditions into the recent days burning of
brides over economic greed, is a perversion of the auspiciousness of Sati. Kerosene, most
often used as the ignition fluid in Dowry Violence, is commonly found in kitchens in India
and is cheap, legal, and accessible. In cases where Dowry Deaths are investigated, often they
are classified by authorities as Dowry Accidents whereby a stove has burst or there is a
kitchen accident.
Thus, from the above discussion it can be conclude that the men resort to acid attack as a
means to intimidate women and to impose their authority on her. Such types of ferocious
attacks foster his male ego and make him feel that he is the honoured maker of God and has
created the male-controlled society. Females between 11 and 30 years are the most
vulnerable to such attacks, in 36% of the acid violence women are attacked for refusing the
marriage proposals. Therefore, the main cause that is seen to be behind acid attack is
rejection for sexual advances.
SOLUTIONS:
Another country we can learn from is Colombia. The country, after a brutal attack on
Natalia Ponce De Leon in 2014, had within two years passed a law named after her,
making penalty for acid attacks comparable to that for homicide.
These acid attacks also happen at large because the country does not treat the
perpetrators more severely. The survivors, on the other hand, are not treated
generously by the society, adding to their troubles.
When it comes to safety of women, India has a long way to go and multiple
measures to take. Acid attacks, however, have been shocking the conscience of the
nation time and again. With several efforts already lined up, several more need to be
put in place to completely eradicate the country of this barbaric crime.
EVE-TEASING LED TO DEADTH OF A WOMEN IN THE STATE TAMIL NADU IN THE YEAR 1998
JUDGEMENT
Eve-Teasing is a euphemism, a conduct which attracts penal action but it is seen, only in
one State, a Statute has been enacted, that is State of Tamil Nadu to contain the same,
the consequence of which may at times drastic. Eve-teasing led to the death of a
woman in the year 1998 in the State of Tamil Nadu which led the Government bringing
an ordinance, namely, the Tami Nadu Prohibition of Eve-Teasing Ordinance, 1998,
which later became an Act, namely, the Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Eve-Teasing Act, 1998
[for short ‘the Eve-Teasing Act’]. The Statement of Objects and Reasons of the Eve-
Teasing Act reads as follows:
Accordingly, the Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Eve-teasing Ordinance, 1998 (Tamil Nadu
Ordinance No. 4 of 1998) was promulgated by the Governor and the same was
published in the Tamil Nadu Government Gazette Extraordinary, dated the 30th July,
1998.
The Bill seeks to replace the said Ordinance.” We are in this case concerned with a
situation where a member of the law enforcement agency, a police personnel, himself
was caught in the act of eve-teasing of a married woman leading to criminal and
disciplinary proceeding, ending in his dismissal from service, the legality of which is the
subject matter of this appeal.
The respondent herein, while he was on duty at the Armed Reserve, Palayamkottai was
deputed for Courtallam season Bandobust duty on 9.7.1999 and he reported for duty
on that date at 8.30 PM at the Courtallam Season Police out post. At about 11.00 PM he
visited the Tenkasi bus stand in a drunken state and misbehaved and eve-teased a
married lady, who was waiting along with her husband, to board a bus. The respondent
approached that lady with a dubious intention and threatened both husband and wife
stating that he would book a case against the husband unless the lady accompanied
him. Further, he had disclosed his identity as a police man. Both husband and wife got
panic and complained to a police man, namely, Head Constable Adiyodi (No.1368) who
was standing along with Head Constable Peter (No.1079) of Tenkasi Police Station on
the opposite side of the bus-stand. They were on night duty at the bus stand. They
rushed to the spot and took the respondent into custody and brought him to Tenkasi
Police Station along with the husband and wife. Following that, a complaint
No.625/1999 was registered on 10.7.1999 at that Police Station against the respondent
under Section 509 of the Indian Penal Code and under Section 4 of the Eve-teasing Act.
On 10.7.1999, at about 1.25 hrs., the respondent was taken to the Government Hospital
Tenkasi for medical examination. There he was examined by Dr. N. Rajendran, who
issued a Certificate of Drunkenness.
The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Armed Reserve, Tiruneveli, conducted a detailed
domestic enquiry and after examining ten prosecution witnesses and perusing fourteen
prosecution documents and after hearing the defence witnesses, submitted a report
dated 22.11.1999 finding all the charges proved against the delinquent respondent. The
Superintendent of Police, Tiruneveli after carefully perusing the enquiry report
dismissed the respondent from service on 4.1.2000.
The respondent, aggrieved by the dismissal order, filed O.A. No.1144 of 2000 before the
Tamil Nadu Administrative Tribunal, Chennai. While the O.A. was pending before the
Tribunal, the Judicial Magistrate, Tenkasi rendered the judgment in S.T.C No.613 of
2000 on 20.11.2000 acquitting the respondent of all the charges. The judgment of the
Criminal Court was brought to the notice of the Tribunal and it was submitted that, on
the same set of facts, the delinquent be not proceeded within the departmental
proceeding. The judgment of this Court in Capt. M. Paul Anthony v. Bharat Gold Mines
Ltd. and Another (1999) 3 SCC 679 was also placed before the Tribunal in support of
that contention.
The Tribunal noticed that both, husband and wife, deposed before the Enquiry Officer
that the respondent had committed the offence, which was supported by the other
prosecution witnesses, including the two policemen who took the respondent in
custody from the place of incident. Consequently, the Tribunal took the view that no
reliance could be placed on the judgment of the criminal court. The O.A. was
accordingly dismissed by the Tribunal vide order dated 23.3.2004. The order was
challenged by the respondent in a Writ Petition No.13726 of 2004 before the High Court
of Madras. The High Court took the view that if a criminal case and departmental
proceedings against an official are based on the same set of facts and evidence and the
criminal case ended in an honourable acquittal and not on technical grounds, imposing
punishment of removal of the delinquent official from service, based on the findings of
domestic enquiry would not be legally sustainable. The High Court also took the view
that the version of the doctor who was examined as PW8 and Ext. P-4 certificate issued
by him, could not be considered as sufficient material to hold the respondent guilty and
that he had consumed alcohol, but was found normal and had no adverse influence of
alcohol. The High Court, therefore, allowed the writ petition and set aside the impugned
order dismissing him from service. It was further ordered that the respondent be
reinstated with continuity of service forthwith, with back wages from the date of
acquittal in the criminal case, till payment.
The State, aggrieved by the said judgment has filed this appeal by special leave through
the Deputy Inspector General of Police. Shri C. Paramasivam, learned counsel appearing
for the appellant, submitted that the High Court was not justified in interfering with
disciplinary proceedings and setting aside the order of dismissal of the respondent.
Learned counsel submitted that the High Court overlooked the fact that the standard of
proof in a domestic enquiry and criminal enquiry is different. The mere acquittal by the
criminal Court does not entitle the delinquent for exonerating in the disciplinary
proceedings. Learned counsel also submitted that the case in hand is not where
punishment of dismissal was imposed on the basis of conviction in a criminal trial and
only, in such situation, acquittal by a Court in a criminal trial would have some
relevance. Further, it was also pointed out that, in the instant case, the respondent was
not honourably acquitted by the criminal Court, but was acquitted since complainant
turned hostile.
Shri V. N. Subramaniam, learned counsel appearing for the respondent, supported the
findings recorded by the High Court. Learned counsel submitted that the judgment of
the criminal court acquitting the respondent has to be construed as an honourable
acquittal and that the respondent cannot be proceeded with on the same set of facts on
which he was acquitted by a criminal court. Learned counsel also placed reliance on the
judgment of this Court in Capt. M. Paul case (supra).
We may first deal with the departmental proceedings initiated against the respondent.
The charges were inquired into by the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Armed Reserve
Tirunelveli. The prosecution examined ten witnesses and fourteen documents were
produced. On the side of the defence, D.W. 1 and D.W. 2 were examined. After
examining the witnesses on either side and after giving an opportunity of hearing, the
Enquiry Officer found all the three charges proved beyond reasonable doubt. P.Ws. 4
and 5, who were Head Constables 1368 Adiyodi of Tenkasi Police Station and Head
Constable 1079 Peter of Tenkasi Police Station, clearly narrated the entire incident and
the involvement of the respondent, so also PW 6, the Head Constable of Tenkasi Police
Station. The Enquiry Officer clearly concluded that the evidence tendered by the
prosecution witnesses P.Ws. 4, 5 and 6 and prosecution documents 3, 4 and 5 would
clearly prove the various charges levelled against him. The Medical Officer of the
Government Hospital had also certified that the delinquent had consumed liquor and he
was not cooperating for urine and blood tests. The Enquiry Officer also found that the
delinquent ought to have reported for duty at the out-post station on 10.7.1999 at
07.00 hrs. as per the instruction given to him on 9.7.1999 at 20.30 hrs., while he
reported for courtallam season Bandobust duty at season out-post police station. But, it
was found that the delinquent had failed to report for duty. Further, he had also
indulged in the activity of eve-teasing a married woman. After finding the delinquent
respondent guilty of all the charges, the Enquiry Officer submitted its report dated
22.11.1999. The Superintendant of Police, Tirunelveli concurred with the findings of the
Enquiry Officer and held that the charges were clearly proved beyond reasonable
doubt. It was held that the respondent being a member of a disciplined force should not
have behaved in a disorderly manner and that too in a drunken state, in a public place,
and misbehaving with a married woman. It was held that the said conduct of the
respondent would undermine the morale of the police force, consequently, the
Superintendant of Police awarded the punishment of dismissal from service on the
respondent, vide its proceeding dated 4.1.2000. The respondent then filed an appeal
before the Inspector General of Police, which was rejected vide his proceeding dated
10.3.2000. Respondent then filed an application in O.A. No. 1144 of 2000 before the
Tamil Nadu Administrative Tribunal. While O.A. was pending, the delinquent was
acquitted of the criminal charges.
The meaning of the expression ‘honourable acquittal’ came up for consideration before
this Court in Management of Reserve Bank of India, New Delhi v. Bhopal Singh
Panchal (1994) 1 SCC 541. In that case, this Court has considered the impact of
Regulation 46(4) dealing with honourable acquittal by a criminal court on the
disciplinary proceedings. In that context, this Court held that the mere acquittal does
not entitle an employee to reinstatement in service, the acquittal, it was held, has to be
honourable. The expressions ‘honourable acquittal’, ‘acquitted of blame’, ‘fully
exonerated’ are unknown to the Code of Criminal Procedure or the Penal Code, which
are coined by judicial pronouncements. It is difficult to define precisely what is meant
by the expression ‘honourably acquitted’. When the accused is acquitted after full
consideration of prosecution evidence and that the prosecution had miserably failed to
prove the charges levelled against the accused, it can possibly be said that the accused
was honourably acquitted.
In R.P. Kapoor v. Union of India, AIR 1964 SC 787, it was held even in the case of
acquittal, departmental proceedings may follow where the acquittal is other than
honourable. In State of Assam and another v. Raghava Rajgopalachari reported in 1972
SLR 45, this Court quoted with approval the views expressed by Lord Williams, J. in
(1934) 61 ILR Cal. 168 which is as follows: “The expression “honourably acquitted” is
one which is unknown to court of justice. Apparently it is a form of order used in courts
martial and other extra judicial tribunals. We said in our judgment that we accepted the
explanation given by the appellant believed it to be true and considered that it ought to
have been accepted by the Government authorities and by the magistrate. Further, we
decided that the appellant had not misappropriated the monies referred to in the
charge. It is thus clear that the effect of our judgment was that the appellant was
acquitted as fully and completely as it was possible for him to be acquitted. Presumably,
this is equivalent to what Government authorities term ‘honourably acquitted’”.
As we have already indicated, in the absence of any provision in the service rule for
reinstatement, if an employee is honourably acquitted by a Criminal Court, no right is
conferred on the employee to claim any benefit including reinstatement. Reason is that
the standard of proof required for holding a person guilty by a criminal court and the
enquiry conducted by way of disciplinary proceeding is entirely different. In a criminal
case, the onus of establishing the guilt of the accused is on the prosecution and if it fails
to establish the guilt beyond reasonable doubt, the accused is assumed to be innocent.
It is settled law that the strict burden of proof required to establish guilt in a criminal
court is not required in a disciplinary proceedings and preponderance of probabilities is
sufficient. There may be cases where a person is acquitted for technical reasons or the
prosecution giving up other witnesses since few of the other witnesses turned hostile
etc. In the case on hand the prosecution did not take steps to examine many of the
crucial witnesses on the ground that the complainant and his wife turned hostile. The
court, therefore, acquitted the accused giving the benefit of doubt. We are not
prepared to say in the instant case, the respondent was honourably acquitted by the
criminal court and even if it is so, he is not entitled to claim reinstatement since the
Tamil Nadu Service Rules do not provide so.
In view of the above mentioned circumstances, we are of the view that the High Court
was not justified in setting aside the punishment imposed in the departmental
proceedings as against the respondent, in its limited jurisdiction under ARTICLE 226 of
the Constitution of India.. We may, in the facts and circumstances of this case, wish to
add some aspects which are also of considerable public importance. We notice that
there is no uniform law in this country to curb eve-teasing effectively in or within the
precinct of educational institutions, places of worship, bus stands, metro-stations,
railway stations, cinema theatres, parks, beaches, places of festival, public service
vehicles or any other similar place. Eve-teasing generally occurs in public places which,
with a little effort, can be effectively curbed. Consequences of not curbing such a
menace, needless to say, at times disastrous. There are many instances where girls of
young age are being harassed, which sometimes may lead to serious psychological
problems and even committing suicide. Every citizen in this country has right to live with
dignity and honour which is a fundamental right guaranteed under of the Constitution
of India. Sexual harassment like eve- teasing of women amounts to violation of rights
guaranteed under Articles 14, 15 as well. We notice in the absence of effective
legislation to contain eve-teasing, normally, complaints are registered under IPC.
SECTION NO 249 says that “Whoever, to the annoyance of others- (a) does any obscene
act in any public place, or (b) sings, recites or utters any obscene song; ballad or words,
in or near any public place, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description
for a term which may extend to three months, or with fine, or with both”.
It is for the prosecution to prove that the accused committed any obscene act or the
accused sang, recited or uttered any obscene song; ballad or words and this was done in
or near a public place, it was of obscene nature and that it had caused annoyance to
others. Normally, it is very difficult to establish those facts and, seldom, complaints are
being filed and criminal cases will take years and years and often people get away with
no punishment and filing complaint and to undergo a criminal trial itself is an agony for
the complainant, over and above, the extreme physical or mental agony already
suffered.
SECTION NO 506 IPC says, “Whoever intending to insult the modesty of any woman,
utters any word, makes any sound or gesture, or exhibits any object, intending, that
such word or sound shall be heard, or that such gesture or object shall be seen, by such
woman, or intrudes upon the privacy of such woman, shall be punished with simple
imprisonment for a term which may extend to one year, or with fine or with both”. The
burden is on the prosecution to prove that the accused had uttered the words or made
the sound or gesture and that such word, sound or gesture was intended by the
accused to be heard or seen by some woman. Normally, it is difficult to establish this
and, seldom, woman files complaints and often the wrong doers are left unpunished
even if complaint is filed since there is no effective mechanism to monitor and follow up
such acts. The necessity of a proper legislation to curb eve-teasing is of extreme
importance, even the Tamil Nadu Legislation has no teeth.
Eve teasing today has become pernicious, horrid and disgusting practice. The Indian
Journal of Criminology and Criminalistics (January- June 1995 Edn.) has categorized eve
teasing into five heads viz. (1) verbal eve teasing; (2) physical eve teasing; (3)
psychological harassment; (4) sexual harassment; and (5) harassment through some
objects. (1977) 6 SCC 241, this Court has laid down certain guidelines on sexual
harassments. ; (1995) 6 SCC 194, this Court has explained the meaning of ‘modesty’ in
relation to women. More and more girl students, women etc. go to educational
institutions, work places etc. and their protection is of extreme importance to a civilized
and cultured society. The experiences of women and girl children in over-crowded
buses, metros, trains etc. are horrendous and a painful ordeal.
LOOPHOLES :
Marital Rape – Not rape – An absolute baloney: The statue is quite an elaborate and
extensive one. It aims at covering all aspects and ingredients of the monstrous and
heinous crime of rape. What the law fails to understand here is that a wife is a woman
first of all and she can never stop being a woman till the end of her days. So, if being a
wife puts her into a more vulnerable position as the husband could actually have
intercourse without her consent, the law itself is backfiring the very intent of the
legislation, that is to protect women from such monstrous crimes.
"Penetration" – Poorly defined : The word "penetration" is very obscure and indefinite.
Ordinarily in the act of rape the "penetration" is made by the penal organ.
Unfortunately, there are many gruesome instances where external objects have been
inserted into the women’s organ such as the infamous "Delhi gang rape”. This is what
happened in the case of Smt Sudesh Jhaku v. Kcj and Ors. In this situation the judiciary
blames the legislation for poor drafting and the judiciary is blamed for poor
interpretation. Ultimately it is nothing but a grave miscarriage of justice. Therefore,
either the statute must be elaborate enough to cover all such monstrous acts within the
ambit of rape or the courts must exercise wide interpretation or rather a liberal
approach towards interpretation of such a vague statue.
Requirement for an exclusive statute for paedophiles : Sexual assault on children is
again on the rise yet there is no exclusive enactment or statute to address such a
heinous crime. Currently, sexual assaults on children are dealt under section 375,376
and 377. Rape is no doubt a monstrous act but child sexual assault is even graver than
rape and the perpetrators of child sexual assault need severe deterrence through an
exclusive act or a provision. When there are umpteen enactments from a pin to a plane
in India, why not there be a separate legislation for child sexual assault? When Dowry
was at the peak, the Dowry Prohibition Act came to the rescue. Similarly, when
Domestic violence was a pressing social issue, The Domestic Violence act was enacted.
Thus, the legislators ought to enact a special legislation to tackle the problem of child
sexual assault
SOLUTIONS:
.All the State Governments and Union Territories are directed to depute plain clothed
female police officers in the precincts of bus-stands and stops, railway stations, metro
stations, cinema theatres, shopping malls, parks, beaches, public service vehicles, places
of worship etc. so as to monitor and supervise incidents of eve-teasing.
There will be a further direction to the State Government and Union Territories to
install CCTV in strategic positions which itself would be a deterrent and if detected, the
offender could be caught.
Where any incident of eve-teasing is committed in a public service vehicle either by the
passengers or the persons in charge of the vehicle, the crew of such vehicle shall, on a
complaint made by the aggrieved person, take such vehicle to the nearest police station
and give information to the police. Failure to do so should lead to cancellation of the
permit to ply.
State Governments and Union Territories are directed to establish Women’ Helpline in
various cities and towns, so as to curb eve-teasing within three months.
Suitable boards cautioning such act of eve-teasing be exhibited in all public places
including precincts of educational institutions, bus stands, railway stations, cinema
theatres, parks, beaches, public service vehicles, places of worship etc.
Responsibility is also on the passers-by and on noticing such incident, they should also
report the same to the nearest police station or to Women Helpline to save the victims
from such crimes.
The State Governments and Union Territories of India would take adequate and
effective measures by issuing suitable instructions to the concerned authorities
including the District Collectors and the District Superintendent of Police so as to take
effective and proper measures to curb such incidents of eve-teasing.
No concrete rules for protection of women from sexual harassment in workplace prior to
this case
Vishaka case laid down guidelines for prevention of sexual harassment of women at
workplace
Some major lapses are there and there is scope of improvement
FACTS:
Bhanwari Devi was a social activist in one of the villages in Rajasthan and worked for
stopping child marriages in the village.
She endeavoured to stop the marriage of Ramkaran Gujjar’s daughter who was still an
infant. She was not excused for this ‘fault’ and was subjected to social boycott.
She was gang-raped by Ramkaran Gujjar and his five friends in front of her husband on
September 1992. She was declined treatment at the primary health centre.
The police also repeatedly taunted her when she approached them to file a complaint. The
trial court discharged the accused for being not guilty. Various women activists and social
organizations voiced their support to Devi and a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) was filed in
the Apex court under the name ‘Vishaka’.
ISSUES:
Whether or not it is mandatory for enacting guidelines for prevention of sexual harassment
of women at workplace?
JUDGEMENT:
The apex court observed that each such incident violates the basic rights of ‘Gender
Equality’ and therefore the right of life and personal liberty under article 21 of the Indian
Constitution.
Also, every profession or trade should provide safe working environment to the employees.
Sexual harassment at workplace hampers the victim’s right to live a dignified life.
Thus, the court laid down certain guidelines to be followed by the employers and
employees in the workplaces to avoid sexual harassment of women at workplace.
These guidelines were simply called the ‘Vishaka guidelines’ which were later incorporated
into Sexual Harassment at workplace (Prevention, Prohibition, and Redressal) Act 2013.
LOOPHOLES:
Absence of punishment for non-compliance. There is no mention of a fine or trail that a
perpetrator might have to face.
it fails to hide those ladies operating within the agricultural employees and defence force,
that area unit mostly men – dominated sectors.
the act seems to be gender biased since it solely protects ladies.
the act has wide scope for false allegations. There are a unit high possibility of those laws
obtaining put-upon at the hands of girls for his or her personal advantages.
the availability relating to the fixing of the financial compensation per the economic
potential of the person, makes it discriminatory since the person with high rank and
standing are going to be created to pay quite the person with status, that out of nothing
appears to serve any purpose although being discriminatory in nature.
SOLUTIONS:
In addition to ensuring compliance with the other provisions stipulated, the Sexual
Harassment Act casts certain obligations upon the employer to, inter-alia,
Family pressure
Police attitude
Social stigma
Prolonged court trial
Faulty law implementation
Various corrupt practices
R
E
F
E
R
E
N
C
E
S
:
1) www.Indiankanoon.com
2) Wikipedia : Violation of women rights