You are on page 1of 4

728 J . Org. C h e m .

1989,54, 728-731
(D20) 6 2.35-2.65 (m, 8 H, CH2CH2),6.95 (s, 2 H, CH=CH), The actual oxidant appears to be I, (eq 3) and hydrogen
7.3-7.6 (m, 4 H, Ar). peroxide serves to regenerate iodine from HI (eq 4). In
Registry No. la, 90549-82-9; lb, 76673-34-2; IC, 97860-58-7; the absence of iodine the starting dihydroxybenzene is
Id, 118071-16-2;2a, 118111-04-9;2b, 76673-35-3;2c, 97860-59-8; recovered unchanged. However, the use of a stoichio-
0 2 , 7782-44-7.
OH 0
I II

Facile and Convenient Syntheses of Quinones


from Phenols dH 0

Francesco Minisci,* Attilio Citterio, Elena Vismara,


2HI + H202 - I2 + 2H20 (4)

Francesca Fontana, and Silvia De Bernardinis metric amount of iodine leads only to low conversions
(-10%) of the dihydroxybenzene to the quinone. On the
Dipartimento di Chimica del Politecnico, other hand, the quinone is significantly reduced to hy-
Piazza L. da Vinci 32, 20133 Milano, Italy
droquinone by HI, clearly indicating that reaction of eq
Mariano Correale 3 is reversible and the equilibrium is shifted a t left. Our
procedure is particularly effective because the fast oxida-
Enichem Sintesi, Madone BG, Italy tion of HI by H202(eq 4) keeps very low the stationary
Received June 16, 1988
concentration of HI, shifting the equilibrium of eq 3 at
right. Thus hydrogen peroxide makes catalytic in I, the
The oxidation of monohydroxy and dihydroxy aromatics process and a t the same time makes very efficient the
is the most general method to obtain quinones. The ox- overall reaction by fast oxidation of HI.
idation of 1,2- or 1,4-dihydroxybenzenes to the corre- The oxidation of monohydric phenols is another general
sponding quinones has been achieved by a variety of ox- method to obtain p-quinones.' High yields can be obtained
idants. The use of silver oxide or silver carbonate is gen- by suitable choice of the oxidant' or anodic oxidation.1°
erally the method of choice,' but it is not practical for However, severe limitations exist for a large-scale appli-
large-scale preparations, due to the expensive oxidants. cation of the known procedures, also with the most se-
Recently, a new method of oxidation of l,4-hydro- lective and mild oxidants (thallium nitrate,l' Jones reag-
quinones to 1,4-benzoquinones by diphenyl diselenide ent,', Fremy's salt,* etc.), owing to their toxicity and the
catalyzed hydrogen peroxide has been reported.2 That high cost. More convenient oxidants, such as molecular
prompts up to report a ~ a t e n t e d new
, ~ facile, general oxygen13and hydrogen peroxide,14have therefore attracted
procedure of oxidation of dihydroxybenzenes, which is considerable attention; they were generally used in the
more convenient and less expensive than the methods so presence of expensive metal-complex catalysts with mod-
far known. The procedure involves the oxidation of the erate to good selectivity and were mainly applied to simple
dihydroxybenzenes by H 2 0 2 in methanolic or aqueous substrates. We now report a new highly selective synthesis
solution, depending on the solubility of the dihydroxy- of p-quinones from 2,6-disubstituted phenols suitable for
benzene, at room temperature in the presence of catalytic large-scale works3 It involves the oxidation of the phenol
amounts of I, or HI (eq 1 and 2). While the reaction is by hydrogen peroxide in the presence of molecular bromine
or hydrogen bromide as catalyst (eq 5 ) . Also in this case
the actual oxidant appears to be bromine (eq 6), and H202

+ 2H20 (11
?H R
R4)23& OH + H202 12 @
;;R1 0 R2

1 2
8
5 6

R2 R2 (4) Teuber, H.; Rau, W. Chem. Ber. 1953, 86, 1036. Zimmer, H.;
4
Lanken, D. C.; Morgan, S. W. Chem. Reu. 1971, 71, 229.
3 (5) Kharash, M. S.; Yashi, B. S.; J. Org. Chem. 1957,22, 1439.
(6) Balogh, V.; Fetizon, M.; Golfier, M. J. Org. Chem. 1971,36, 1339.
also catalyzed by Br2, it is less selective because of the (7) Teuber, H.; Glosamer, 0. Chem. Ber. 1965, 98, 2643.
competitive electrophilic addition of bromine to the ac- ( 8 ) Teuber, H.; Gotz, N. Chem. Ber. 1954,87, 1236.
tivated aromatic ring, and with complete conversions of (9) Ngo, M.; Larson, K. R.; Mendenholl, G. D. J. Org. Chem. 1986,51,
5390.
the dihydroxybenzenes the yields are generally significantly (10) Ronlan, A. J . Chem. Commun. 1971, 1647.
lower (Table I) compared with I, catalysis. Chlorine is not (11)McKillop, A.; Perry, D. M.; Edwards, M.; Autus, S.; Farkas, L.;
suitable. Nogrady, N.; Taylor, E. C. J . Org. Chem. 1976, 41, 282 and reference
therein.
(12) Liotta, D.; Arbiser, J.; Short, J. W.: Saindane, M. J. Orp. Chem.
1983, 48, 2932.
(1) (a) Thomas, R. H. The Chemistry of the Quinoid Compound; (13) Gras, J. L. Tetrahedron Lett. 1977, 4117. Corey, J.; Danheiser,
Patai, S., Ed.; Wiley: London, 1974; p 111. (b) Land, T. In Compre- R. L.; Chandraxkaran, S.; Siret, P.; Keck, G. E.; Gras, J. L. J . Am. Chem.
hemiue Organic Chemistry; Stoddart, J. F., Ed.; 1979; Vol. I, p 1216. (c) SOC.1978, 100, 8031. Fullerton, T. J.; Ahern, S. P. Tetrahedron Lett.
Rodd's Chemistry of Carbonyl Compounds; supplement to IIIB/IIIC, 1976, 139. Cajdeville, P.; Maning, M. Ibid. 1983, 5611.
1981; pp 8-14. (14) Bryce-Smith, D.; Gilbet, A. J. Chem. SOC.1964, 873. Ito, I.;
(2) Pratt, D. V.; Ruan, F.; Hopkins, P. B. J. Org. Chem. 1987,52, 5053. Aiharo, K.; Mataumoto, M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1983, 5249. Barton, D. H.
(3) Minisci, F.; Citterio, A.; Vismara, E.; De Bernardinis, S.; Correale, R.; Magnus, P. D.; Quirmey, J. C. J. Chem. SOC.,Perkin Trans. 1 1975,
M.; Neri, C. Italian Patent (Enichem) (18.5.1986) no. 20754 A/86. 1610.

0022-3263/89/1954-0728$01.50/0 0 1989 American Chemical Society


Notes J. Org. Chem., Vol. 54, No. 3, 1989 729

9 and (ii) it makes more selective the overall process com-


pared with the use of stoichiometric amount of Br2 by
+ 4HBr (6) keeping very low the stationary concentration of HBr.
With iodine, under the same conditions, the yields are
significantly lower, probably because the bulky iodine atom
makes less favorable the ipso attack. With chlorine only
2HBr + H 2 0 2 - 0
Brp + 2H20 (7) traces of quinones were observed.
Two synthetic procedures have been developed in
serves to regenerate Brz from HBr (eq 7 ) . The oxidation, agreement with this mechanism, which requires that all
in fact, takes place by using stoichiometric amount of the phenol must be transformed into the 4-bromo deriv-
bromine under the same conditions, but again the effi- ative in the initial step because the bromination of the
ciency is much lower because it is known15 that 2,6-di- phenol is much faster than the further bromination of the
tert-butyl-p-benzoquinone reacts with HBr in methanolic 4-bromophenol. The first procedure involves the use of
solution giving the 4-methoxy-2,6-di-tert-butylphenol (eq 0.55 mol of bromine and 2 mol of hydrogen peroxide for
8) and other unidentified compounds containing methoxy mole of phenol in order to make still available a small
0 on excess of bromine when all the phenol is transformed in
II I
the 4-bromo derivative. In the second procedure 0.1 mol
of bromine and 2.5 mol of hydrogen peroxide are used per
mole of phenol, but this last is added dropwise within 1
I h to the reacting mixture: the fast oxidation of the phenol
OW3 to the quinone keeps the stationary concentration of the
groups. In the oxidation by stoichiometric Br2, certainly phenol lower than that of bromine, which is continuously
the first step of the mechanism involves the electrophilic regenerated from HBr by H202(eq 7). Hydrogen bromide
bromination of the phenol (eq 9). On the other hand, it can be utilized instead of Br2, but an additional 0.5 mol

a OH
I

+ Brp -
OH
I

01
+ HBr (9)
of H2O2must be used per mole of HBr.
Evidently the mechanism (eq 9-11) indicates that the
oxidation also occurs with phenols substituted in the para
position by a halogen atom (Cl, Br, I). This is clearly
shown by the results obtained with the substrates 5g and
5h in Table I1 in which the results are summarized.
Small amounts of dimeric quinones are generally ob-
is known16 that 2,6-di-tert-butyl-4-substituted-phenols served as byproducts (eq 12). The high yields, the simple
react with bromine, giving the 2-bromo-4-substituted- and mild experimental conditions, the generality, and the
2,6-di-tert-butyl-3,5-cyclohexadienone or the 4-bromo-4- unexpensive reagents and catalyst recommend these pro-
substituted-2,6-di-tert-butyl-2,5-cyclohexadienone, de- cedures as valuable methods also for industrial applica-
pending on the nature of the substituent in position 4. In tion~.~
particular, the 4-bromo-2,6-di-tert-butylphenol gives16 in
high yield the 4,4-dibromo-2,6-di-tert-butyl-2,5-cyclo-
hexadienone (eq 10). Actually we have isolated the com-
&
2 + 2H2O2 - O w 0 + 4H20 (12)

Experimental Section
General Procedures for the Oxidation of 1 and 3 (eq 1,2).
(A) H202(60%) (10.0mL, 0.22 mol) was added dropwise with
pound 7 in the initial stage of the bromine-catalyzed ox- stirring to a solution of dihydroxybenzene (0.20 mol), I2(10 mmol),
idation of 2,6-di-tert-butylphenoland hydrolyzed it to the and concentrated H2S04(10 mL) in methanol (600 mL) at room
temperature. After 4 h part of the formed quinone crystallized
corresponding quinone (eq 11). The hydrolysis of 7 to the and was collected by filtration. The methanolic solution was
8 R poured in 100 mL of water and extracted with ether, and the
quinones were purified by flash chromatography on silica gel
(hexane-ethyl acetate, 3:l). The products were identified by the
melting points (Table I) and by comparison of the IR and NMR
spectra of authentic samples.
U (B)A procedure similar to A has been utilized with di-
hydroxybenzenes, which have sufficient solubility in water, such
quinone in the presence of H20zis practically quantitative, as hydroquinone, 2-methylhydroquinone, and 2,g-dimethyl-
but yields are lower in the absence of H202,probably owing hydroquinone, with the only difference that water was used instead
to the side reactions with HBr (eq 8), contributing to ex- of methanol. In this way the quinone directly crystallized from
plain the lower yields obtained in the oxidation with the aqueous solution and was easily separated by simple filtration.
stoichiometric bromine compared with the bromine-cata- (C) A procedure similar to A was followed with the difference
lyzed oxidation with H202, that 20 mmol of HI was utilized instead of 12.
Thus the overall mechanism appears to involve eq 9-11 (D) A procedure similar to B was followed with the difference
and 7 . Again, as for the oxidation of dihydroxybenzenes that 20 mmol of HI was utilized instead of I2
(E)The same procedure as in A was used, with the difference
with 12,hydrogen peroxide has a 2-fold function: (i) it that 10 mmol of Br2 was utilized instead of 12.
makes catalytic in Brz the process by fast oxidation of HBr, The results are summarized in Table I.
Procedure B has been utilized with hydroquinone and stoi-
(15) Karhu, M. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1980, 1695. chiometric amount of I2 in the absence of H20z. The conversion
(16) Ershov, V. V.; Volod’kin, A. A. Izu. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Otd. of hydroquinone to p-benzoquinone is 10%; most of the hydro-
Khim. Nauk 1963, 893. quinone is left unchanged.
730 J . Org. Chem., Vol. 54, No. 3, 1989 Notes

Table I. Oxidation of 1,2- a n d 1,4-Dihydroxybenzenes by HzOz


mp, "C
substrate R1 R2 R3 R4 product procedure yield, % found lit. (ref)
la H H H H 2a A 97 114 115
la 2a B 93
la 2a C 95
la 2a D 93
la 2a E 52
lb CH3 H H H 2b A 98 68 68-69
lb 2b B 92
lb 2b C 94
lb 2b D 93
IC CH3 H H CH3 2c A 95 72 72-3
IC CH3 H H CH3 2c B 92
IC 2c C 94
IC 2c D 92
Id CH, CH3 H CH3 2d A 98 32 32
Id 2d D 96
Id 2d E 94
le CH3 CH3 CH3 CH3 2e A 92 110 111
If CH, H (!ZH5 2f A 87 40 40-1
1g t-Bu H H t-Bu 2g A 86 67 67
k 2g C 88
lg 2g E 68
lh t-Bu H t-Bu H 2h A 91 152 152
li Ph H H Ph 2i A 97 138 138
3a H CH3 CH3 H 4a A 74 102 102
3b H t-Bu H H 4b A 72 66 66-7
3c t-Bu H t-Bu H 4c A 76 115 114-5
3c 4c D 75
3c 4c E 48
1,4-dihydroxynaphthalene 1,4-naphthoquinone A 98 124 124
1,4-dihydroxynaphthalene 1,4-naphthoquinone D 97
1,4-dihydroxynaphthalene 1,4-naphthoquinone E 72
2-methyl-1,4-dihydroxynaphthalene Z-methyl-1,4-naphthoquinone A 98 106 107

Table 11. Bromine-Catalyzed Oxidation of Phenol 5 to Quinone 6 by HzOz


mp, "C
substrate R, R2 R3 R4 R5 product procedure yield," TO found lit. (ref)
5a CH, H H H CH, 6a A 85 72 72-73 (4)
5a 6a B 82
5a 6a C 86
5a 6a D 83
5b CH3 CH3 H H CH3 6b A 77 32 32
5b 6b C 82
5c CH3 CH, H CH3 CH3 6c A 92 110 111
5c 6c C 90
5d C6H5 H H C6H5 6d A 95 137-8 138
5d 6d C 92
5e CH3 H H H C2H5 6e A 84 40 40
5f t-CdHg H H H t-CdHg 6f A 97 66-7 67
5f 6f B 94
5f 6f C 95
5f 6f D 91
5g t-CdHg H C1 H t-CdHg 6g A 98 67 67
5g 6g C 94
5h t-CdHg H Br H t-C,H, 6h A 96 66-7 67
5h 6h C 95
5i 2-methylnaphthol 6ib A 90 107 107
a Based on starting phenol. * 2-Methyl-l,4-naphthoquinone.
R e d u c t i o n of p - B e n z o q u i n o n e by HI. p-Benzoquinone with authentic samples (IR, NMR).
reacts with stoichiometric amount of HI under the conditions of Procedure B. The procedure is similar to A with the difference
procedure B, giving 52% of hydroquinone and 44% of unchanged that HBr (0.11 mol) and HzOz (0.25 mol) were utilized instead
p-benzoquinone. of Br, (0.055 mol) and HzOz (0.2 mol).
G e n e r a l P r o c e d u r e s f o r the Oxidation of 5 (eq 5). P r o - P r o c e d u r e C. A solution of the phenol 5 (0.1mol) in methanol
c e d u r e A. The substituted phenol 5 (0.1 mol) and Br, (2.83 mL, (100 mL) was added dropwise within 1 h to a refluxed solution
0.055 mol) were added to a solution of 60% HzOz (9.8 mL, 0.2 of Br, (0.52 mL, 0.01 mol), 60% HzOz (12.2 mL, 0.25 mol), and
mol) and concentrated H,S04 (6 mL) in methanol (300 mL). The concentrated H2S04(6 mL) in methanol (100 mL). The solution
resulting mixture was refluxed for 20 min and then concentrated was refluxed for additional 5 min and worked up as in A.
to 100 mL and cooled a t 0 "C; the precipitated quinone 2 was Procedure D. The procedure is similar to C with the difference
collected by filtration and recrystallized from pentane. Residual that HBr (0.02 mol) and H202(0.27 mol) were used instead of
amounts of quinone were recovered by dilution of methanolic Brz (0.01 mol) and HzOz (0.25 mol).
solution with water, extraction with ether, and isolation by flash T h e results are summarized in the Table 11.
chromatography on silica gel (hexane-ethyl acetate, 3:l). T h e Procedure A has been utilized by using iodine instead of
quinones 6 were identified by the melting points and comparison bromine with 5f; the yield of 6f is 16%. Under the same con-
J. Org. Chem. 1989,54, 731-732 73 1

ditions with Cl, instead of Br, only traces (<2%) of 6f were Scheme I
observed.
Hydrolysis of the Dibromocyclohexadienone 7. Procedure
A at room temperature allows the separation of the dibromo-
cyclohexadienone 7 in 10%yield by flash chromatography on silica
gel (hexane-ethyl acetate, 3:l) as a crystalline product: mp 127 I I
O C (lit.16mp 127-128 "C); IR 1660 cm-'; 'H NMR 6 1.2 (s, t-Bu,
2
NH2 NH2
18 H), 7.08 (s, CH of quinone, 2 H); MS, m l z 306 (M'), 284, 269, 1
253, 242, 252, 189.
Hydrolysis of 7 in the Presence of Hz02 The hydrolysis
of 7 was performed under the same conditions of procedure A 4-Amino-1,2,4-triazole (4-AT) is an activated and blocked
in the absence of Br,. A quantitative yield of 2,6-di-tert-butyl- triazole that can be prepared directly from hydrazine and
p-benzoquinone was obtained. derivatives of formic acid.' We report a regiospecific
Hydrolysis of 7 in the Absence of H202 The hydrolysis was one-pot synthesis of some l-alkyl-1,2,4-triazolesbased on
performed under the same conditions of procedure A by using the alkylation of 4-amino-1,2,4-triazole and the subsequent
10 mL of H 2 0 instead of H20zand in the absence of Brz. A 47% deamination of the so formed triazolium salt (Scheme I).
yield of 2,6-di-tert-butyl-p-benzoquinone was obtained.
Oxidation of 2,g-Di-tert-butylphenol by Stoichiometric Results and Discussion
Br2 Procedure A was utilized by using a stoichiometric amount
of Br, and in the absence of H202. A 37% yield of 2,g-di-tert- Alkylation of 4-AT proceeded easily in polar media
butyl-p-benzoquinonewas obtained. (isopropyl alcohol, or acetonitrile) exclusively a t N-1 usu-
ally in good yield (Table I). In the case of alkylation with
Acknowledgment. The research has been supported sec-butyl bromide, the yield of l g was only 59%, owing
by the CNR, Progetto Finalizzato Chimica Fine e Secon- to the difficulty encountered in separating l g from re-
daria. maining aminotriazole. However, a satisfactory yield of
Registry No. la, 123-31-9; lb, 95-71-6; IC, 654-42-2; Id, 2g was obtained in the one-pot reaction. The amino-
700-13-0; le, 527-18-4;lf, 72693-14-2; Ig, 2444-28-2; lh, 88-58-4; triazolium salts (la-h) were deaminated readily with a
li, 13379-77-6;2a, 106-51-4;2b, 553-97-9;2c, 137-18-8;2d, 935-92-2; slight excess of nitrous acid in essentially quantitative
2e, 527-17-3; 2f, 29148-36-5; 2g, 2460-77-7; 2h, 719-22-2; 2i, yield. Evolution of nitrous oxide was observed during
844-51-9;3a, 2785-74-2;3b, 98-29-3;3c, 1020-31-1;4a, 4370-50-7; deamination, as has been found in nitrous acid deamina-
4b, 1129-21-1; 4c, 3383-21-9; 5a, 576-26-1; 5b, 2416-94-6; 5c,
527-35-5;5d, 2432-11-3; 5e, 1687-64-5;5f, 128-39-2;5g, 4096-72-4; tion of other 1,l-disubstituted aromatic hydrazines.* It
5h, 1139-52-2; 5i, 7469-77-4; 7, 1144-36-1; 1,4-dihydroxy- should be noted that the 2,4-dichlorophenacyltriazole(2c)
naphthalene, 571-60-8; 2-methyl-1,4-dihydroxynaphthalene, reacts with nitrous acid a t ambient temperature. There-
481-85-6; 1,4-naphthaquinone, 130-15-4; 2-methyl-1,4- fore, it is advisable to carry out deaminations a t 0-5 "C
naphthaquinone, 58-27-5. and to avoid too large an excess of nitrous acid.
We found that the alkylation and deamination reactions
could be performed sequentially in one-pot in good yield
without isolation of the aminotriazolium salts. Alkyl-
triazole isolation is facilitated by the fact that any 4-AT
Synthesis of l-Alkyl-1,2,4-triazoles:A New (starting material) or 1,2,4-triazole (a potential byproduct)
One-Pot Regiospecific Procedure' remains in the aqueous phase from which the desired
product is precipitated or extracted. This reaction se-
Bret A. Astleford, Gerald L. Goe, James G. Keay,* and quence is useful for alkylating agents as unreactive as
Eric F. V. Scriven primary alkyl chlorides as well as for more reactive benzylic
Reilly Industries, Inc., 1500 S. Tibbs Avenue, Indianapolis, and phenacyl halides. Furthermore, the mild nonbasic
Indiana 46241 conditions employed here are particularly suited to al-
kylating agents that bear base-sensitive substituents, which
Received September 22, 1988 contrast with the strongly basic conditions frequently used
in direct alkylations of triazoles. The reaction sequence
Regiospecific alkylation of 1,2,4-triazoles provides a has failed with trityl chloride, however, because the in-
synthetic challenge.2 Direct alkylation of 1,2,4-triazole termediate trityl(aminotriazo1ium) salt undergoes solvolysis
affords usually a mixture of mainly 1- and some 4-sub- to form trityl alcohol under the acidic deamination con-
stituted p r ~ d u c t . ~Ratios vary with the nature of the ditions used.
alkylating agent and conditions but frequently range from Our work provides the first example of a fairly general
70:30 to 9010. Preparation of 1-substituted 1,2,4-triazoles high-yield regiospecific one-pot synthesis of 1-substituted
has become important of late, as a number of such triazoles 1,2,4-triazoles from 4-AT,9 although alkylation of 4-AT'O
has been found to be very effective agricultural fungicides? and deamination of aminotriazoles" and -triazolium saltslo
antimycotic~,~ and more recently aromatase inhibitow6
(5) Richardson, K.; Marriott, M. S. Annu. Rep. Med. Chem. 1987,22,
(1) Dedicated to Dr. Alan R. Katritzky on the occasion of his 60th 159.
birthday. (6) Boyle, F. T.; Wardleworth, J. M. Eur. Pat. Appl. EP 250,198;
(2) Temple, C., Jr. Chemistry of Heterocyclic Compounds; Weiss- Chem. Abstr. 1988,108, 131829. Hirsch, K. S.; Jones, C. D.; Taylor, H.
berger, A., Taylor, E. C., Eds.; Wiley: New York, 1981; Vol. 37. Potts, M. Eur. Pat. Appl. EP 166,556; Chem. Abstr. 1986, 105, 42798.
K. T. Chem. Reu. 1961, 61, 87. Polya, J. B. In Comprehensive Hetero- (7) Allen, C. F. H.; Bell, A. Org. Synth. 1944, 24, 12 and references
cyclic Chemistry; Katritzky, A. R., Rees, C. W., Eds.; Pergamon: Oxford, therein. Goe, G. L.; Scriven, E. F. V.; Keay, J. G.; Huckstep, L. M. Eur.
1984; Vol. 5, p 733. Pat. Appl. EP 269,308, 1988.
(3) (a) Atkinson, M. R.; Polya, J. B. J . Chem. SOC.1954, 3319. Ains- (8) De Rosa, M.; Haberfield, P. J. Org. Chem. 1981, 46, 2639.
worth, C.; Jones, R. G. J. Am. Chem. SOC.1955, 77,621. (b) Claramunt, (9) Kotone, A.; Hoda, M.; Fujita, T. Japan Kokai, 49, 117, 470, 1974.
R. M.; Elguero, J.;Garceran, R. Heterocycles 1985,23,2895. (c) Hongkui, (IO) Becker, H. G. 0.;Boettcher, H.; Roethling, T.; Timpe, H.-J. Wiss.
Z.; Lianam, L.; Qizhen, G. Youji Huarue 1986, 2, 108. Z . Tech. Hochsch. Chem. "Carl Schorlemmer" Leuna-Merseburg 1966,
( 4 ) Fungicide Chemistry, Aduances and Practical Applications; 8, 22.
Green, M. B., Spilker, D.A., Eds.; ACS Symposium Series 304, 1986. (11) Geldard, J. F.; Lions, F. J . Org. Chem. 1965, 30, 318. Alonso, J.
Synthesis and Chemistry of Agrochemicals; Baker, D. R., Fenyes, J. G., M.; Martin, M. R.; de Mendoza, J.; Torres, T.; Elguero, J.Heterocycles
Moberg, W. K., Cross, B., Eds.; ACS Symposium Series 355, 1987. 1987, 26, 989.

0022-326318911954-0731$01.50/0 0 1989 American Chemical Society

You might also like