Professional Documents
Culture Documents
To cite this article: Yoshinori SUZUKI , Takuya NANKAWA , Takuo OZAKI , Toshihiko OHNUKI , Arokiasamy J. FRANCIS ,
Youichi ENOKIDA & Ichiro YAMAMOTO (2007) Electrochemical Studies on Uranium in the Presence of Organic Acids, Journal
of Nuclear Science and Technology, 44:9, 1227-1232
Taylor & Francis makes every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the information (the “Content”) contained
in the publications on our platform. However, Taylor & Francis, our agents, and our licensors make no
representations or warranties whatsoever as to the accuracy, completeness, or suitability for any purpose of
the Content. Any opinions and views expressed in this publication are the opinions and views of the authors,
and are not the views of or endorsed by Taylor & Francis. The accuracy of the Content should not be relied
upon and should be independently verified with primary sources of information. Taylor and Francis shall
not be liable for any losses, actions, claims, proceedings, demands, costs, expenses, damages, and other
liabilities whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with, in relation to or
arising out of the use of the Content.
This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic
reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, sub-licensing, systematic supply, or distribution in any
form to anyone is expressly forbidden. Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://
www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and-conditions
Journal of NUCLEAR SCIENCE and TECHNOLOGY, Vol. 44, No. 9, p. 1227–1232 (2007)
ARTICLE
Advanced Science Research Center, Japan Atomic Energy Agency, Tokai, Ibaraki 319-1195, Japan
3
EcoTopia Science Institute, Nagoya University, Furo-cho, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya 464-8603, Japan
4
Environmental Sciences Department, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York 11973, USA
(Received November 24, 2006 and accepted in revised form April 19, 2007)
We examined electrochemical redox reactions of UO2 2þ in perchlorate and organic acid (oxalic, ma-
lonic, succinic, adipic, L-malic, and L-tartaric acids) solutions using cyclic voltammetry to reveal the ef-
fects of complex formation with organic acids on the redox behavior. In the perchlorate and organic acid
solutions, a redox reaction of UO2 2þ /UO2 þ and an oxidation reaction of U(IV) produced by a dispropor-
tionation of UO2 þ were observed. The peak potentials of the UO2 2þ reduction showed a good linear re-
lationship with the stability constants of 1:1 UO2 2þ -organic complexes. In the presence of malonic acid,
the redox potential for UO2 2þ /UO2 þ was constant at pH 1–2 and 5–6 while it decreased with an increase
in pH from 2 to 5. Additionally, it was independent of malonate concentration at 0.1–0.5 M while it de-
creased with an increase in the concentration from 0.005 to 0.1 M. Based on the experimental and the spe-
ciation calculation results, we determined the redox reactions of UO2 2þ -malonate complexes as a function
of pH and malonate concentration. We also determined the redox reactions of UO2 2þ -oxalate complexes
in the same way.
KEYWORDS: uranium organic complex, organic acid, redox reaction, electrochemistry, cyclic vol-
tammetry, stability constant, uranium(V), disproportionation
I/A
tion states among these three actinides.1)
Psa2
Pma2
(a)
Pma1 (a)
Paa2
I/A
Psc1
(b)
60 A
I/A
0.010 V s-1
0.025 Pmia2
0.050 40 A
Pac1
0.075
0.100
0.125
(c)
Downloaded by [WARSZAWSKI UNIWERSYTET MEDYCZNY- BIBLIOT] at 07:21 24 February 2015
0.150
Pmc1
Pta2
-0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 Pmic1
E / V (vs. Ag/AgCl)
(d)
UO2 2þ with malonic or oxalic acids. In the malonic solution, Malic acid
-0.6
an anodic peak was observed at around 0.15 V. We attribute 3 4 5 6 7
it to an oxidation reaction of U(IV) species produced by the
disproportionation of U(V) similar to the case in the perchlo- log β VI1,1
rate solution.
Figure 3 shows the cyclic voltammogram of UO2 2þ in an Fig. 4 The cathodic peak potentials at v of 0.025 V s1 in Fig. 2
aqueous solution containing 0.1 M NaClO4 and (a) succinic, and Fig. 3 vs. log VI 1;1 .
(b) adipic, (c) L-malic or (d) L-tartaric acids at pH 4.0 meas-
ured at a scan rate of 0.025 V s1 . In the presence of succin- 0.15, 0.40 or 0.45 V in the respective malonic, succinic,
ic, adipic, L-malic or L-tartaric acids, a cathodic peak (Psc1 , adipic, L-malic or L-tartaric acid solutions. These peaks
Pac1 , Pmic1 , or Ptc1 ) was observed at around 0:27 (Esc1 ), are also thought to be an oxidation reaction of U(IV) pro-
0:27 (Eac1 ), 0:51 (Emic1 ) or 0:42 V (Etc1 ), respectively. duced by the disproportionation of U(V). We used stability
These peak potentials were also lower than those in a non-li- constants of 1:1 UO2 2þ -organic complexes (VI 1;1 ) as an in-
gand system, suggesting that the complex formation of dicator of stability of the UO2 2þ -organic complexes and ex-
UO2 2þ occurred with the organic acid. However, an anodic amined the relation between the peak potentials of Pmc1 ,
peak coupled with the cathodic peak was not distinguishable Poc1 , Psc1 , Pac1 , Pmic1 and Ptc1 and the indicators of the stabil-
in their solutions. This result indicates that hardly any oxida- ity of the complexes. Figure 4 shows a plot of the peak po-
tion reaction of U(V) occurred on the electrode because of tentials of the cathodic peak at v of 0.025 V s1 in Fig. 2 and
the fast disproportionation of U(V). An anodic peak Pma2 , Fig. 3 vs. VI 1;1 .17) The peak potentials decreased linearly
Psa2 , Paa2 , Pmia2 or Pta2 was observed at around 0.10, 0.15, with an increase in VI 1;1 . These results show that it is more
-0.1 -0.34
Em1
E / V (vs. Ag/AgCl)
-0.36 Eo1
E / V (vs. Ag/AgCl)
-0.2
-0.38
-0.3
-0.40
E
1
-0.4 E
m1
Downloaded by [WARSZAWSKI UNIWERSYTET MEDYCZNY- BIBLIOT] at 07:21 24 February 2015
E -0.42
o1
-2.5 -2 -1.5 -1 -0.5 0
-0.5
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 log C
pH Fig. 6 Em1 and Eox1 vs. the logarithm of the organic acid concen-
tration (log C).
Fig. 5 The pH dependence of E1 , Em1 and Eox1 .
difficult to reduce UO2 2þ by complexation in the presence of ported by Smith and Martell17) showed that the predominant
an organic acid which forms a stronger complex with species of uranyl at pH 1–2, 2–3, and 3–6 are UO2 2þ ,
UO2 2þ . Essentially, the redox potential of UO2 2þ /UO2 þ in UO2 Mal0 and UO2 Mal2 2 , respectively (H2 Mal: a malonic
the presence of organic acid depends on the ratio of the sta- acid). The predominant species of an uncomplexed malonic
bility constants of UO2 2þ - and UO2 þ -organic complexes (V acid at pH 2–3, 3–5 and 5–6 are H2 Mal0 , HMal and Mal2 ,
and VI ) and we need to plot the redox potentials against respectively. In consideration of the predominant species of
logðV =VI Þ. However, we can get a good linear relationship uranyl and an uncomplexed malonic acid and the m values,
between the peak potentials and log VI 1;1 . The stability con- the redox reactions in pH from 2 to 5 are expressed by the
stants of UO2 þ complexes are generally considered to be following equations:
much smaller than those of UO2 2þ complexes1) and the ef-
UVI O2 Mal0 þ e þ 2Hþ $ UV O2 þ þ H2 Mal0
fect of formation of UO2 þ complexes on the redox potential
is smaller compared to that of UO2 2þ complexes. This ten- (pH 2{3); ð3Þ
dency is useful to predict the potential at which UO2 2þ VI
U O2 Mal2 2 þ V
þ e þ H $ U O2 Mal þ HMal
may be reduced in the presence of an organic acid whose sta- (pH 3{5): ð4Þ
bility constant is already known.
Plock and Miner11) reported the effect of pH on UO2 2þ re-
2þ
3. Effect of pH on the Redox Behavior of UO2 duction in a 1 M malonate solution by polarography. In their
Figure 5 shows pH dependence of E1 in a perchlorate so- study, the half-wave potential decreased with an increase in
lution, Em1 in a malonate solution and Eo1 in an oxalate solu- pH from 1 to 4.8 while Em1 was constant at pH 1 to 2 in our
tion at an organic acid concentration of 20 mM. E1 obtained study. The difference may be caused by the difference of the
at pH 0 to 4 was constant (about 0:14 V). In the malonate malonate concentration. Their work was done at a higher
solution at pH 1–2, Em1 was almost the same value as E1 , malonate concentration compared to our study and UO2 2þ
suggesting that UO2 2þ did not form complexes with a ma- formed a complex with a malonic acid at such a low pH.
lonic acid in this pH range. At pH 2–3 and 3–5, Em1 decreas- In the oxalate solution, Eo1 was constant between pH 4
ed with a rise in pH with slopes of 0:134 and 0:061 V/ and 6 (about 0:38 V), suggesting that the predominant
pH, respectively. The slope of redox potential vs. pH is ex- UO2 2þ species does not change and no protons are involved
pressed theoretically by 0:060m V/pH, where m is the in the redox reaction of UO2 2þ -oxalate complexes in the pH
number of protons involved in the one-electron redox reac- range. The speciation calculation of the 1 mM UO2 2þ and
tion.18) So, those slopes indicate that 2 and 1 protons are in- 20 mM oxalate system showed that the predominant species
volved in the redox reactions at pH ranges of 2–3 and 3–5, of uranium is UO2 Ox2 2 at the pH range (H2 Ox: an oxalic
respectively. Em1 was constant above pH 5 (about 0:40 acid). Below pH 4, Eo1 could not be determined because
V), suggesting that no protons were involved in the redox re- Poa1 was not observed.
action. These results suggest that a different redox reaction
for UO2 2þ proceeded on the electrode for each pH range. 4. Effects of the Concentration of Malonic and Oxalic
In our previous study, we showed that the reduction poten- Acids on the Redox Behavior of UO2 2þ
tial of UO2 2þ -citrate complex shifted as the complex species A plot of Em1 vs. the logarithm of the organic acid concen-
changed.13) A speciation calculation of the 1 mM UO2 2þ and tration (C) at pH 5 is shown in Fig. 6. In the malonate solu-
20 mM malonate system based on the stability constants re- tion, Em1 decreased proportionately with an increase in log C
UO2 (salen)DMF in DMF solution (DMF=N, N-dimetylfor- (C > 0:1 M); Ef ¼ 0:403 V;
mamide, acac=acetylacetonate, and salen=N, N0 -disalicyli- UVI O2 Ox2 2 þ e $ UV O2 Ox2 3
dene-ethylenediaminate). They found that U(V) formed
more stable complexes with multidentate ligands such as (C > 0:005 M); Ef ¼ 0:377 V:
acac and salen than those with unidentate ligands such as The stability constants of UV O2 Mal2 3 and UV O2 Ox2 3
DMF. In our study, a similar tendency was obtained in the were estimated as 5:06 0:07 and 6:7 0:1 V, respectively.
aqueous malonate solutions. We also found that UV O2 Mal2 3 was comparatively stable to-
A plot of Eo1 vs. the logarithm of C at pH 5 is shown in wards disproportionation.
Fig. 6. In the presence of an oxalic acid, Eo1 was constant
(about 0:38 V) in the range of log C from 2:3 to 1:0
Acknowledgements
(C from 0.005 to 0.1 M), indicating that the dissociation of
oxalate from UO2 2þ did not occur (Fig. 6). So, the redox re- The Japan Atomic Energy Agency is gratefully acknowl-
action attributable to Poc1 and Poa1 is suggested as the fol- edged for its partial financial support to Y. Suzuki as a re-
lowing equation: search fellowship for the Promotion of Science and Young
Scientists. This research was supported in part by a Grant-
UVI O2 Ox2 2 þ e $ UV O2 Ox2 3 (C > 0:005 M): ð8Þ
in-Aid of the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science
LogV 1;2 was estimated to be 6:7 0:1 by substituting and Technology to T. Ohnuki and by Environmental Reme-
Ef ¼ 0:377 0:004 V, E0 ¼ 0:142 0:004 V, T ¼ 298 diation Sciences Program, Office of Biological and Environ-
K and log VI 1;2 ¼ 10:6417) into Eq. (7). mental Research Office of Science U.S. Department of
The logs of the stability constants of UV O2 Mal2 3 and Energy under contract No. DE-AC02-98CH10886 to A. J.
U O2 Ox2 3 in a 0.1 M NaClO4 solution obtained in the
V
Francis.
present study were slightly larger than those of
NpV O2 Mal2 3 and NpV O2 Ox2 3 which were determined
by Tochiyama et al.20) using a solvent extraction method References
to be 4.22 and 6.15, respectively, in a 1.0 M NaClO4 solu- 1) R. J. Silva, H. Nitsche, ‘‘Actinide environmental chemistry,’’
tion. A lower ionic strength solution gives larger stability Radiochim. Acta, 70/71, 377 (1995).
constants. So, our results are thought to be reasonable in a 2) W. E. Harris, I. M. Koltoff, ‘‘The polarography of uranium. I.
0.1 M NaClO4 solution. Reduction in moderately acid solutions. Polarographic deter-
mination of uranium,’’ J. Am. Chem. Soc., 67, 1484 (1945). (VI) in malonic acid media,’’ Anal. Chim. Acta, 38, 553
3) I. M. Koltoff, W. E. Harris, ‘‘The polarograhy of uranium. II. (1967).
Polarography in strongly acid solution,’’ J. Am. Chem. Soc., 12) M. Susic, I. Gal, E. Cuker, ‘‘Polarographic determination of
68, 1175 (1946). uranium in ores in ascorbic acid supporting electrolyte,’’ Anal.
4) W. E. Harris, I. M. Koltoff, ‘‘The polarography of uranium. III. Chim. Acta, 11, 586 (1954).
Polarography in very weakly acid, neutral or basic solution,’’ 13) Y. Suzuki, T. Nankawa, T. Yoshida, et al., ‘‘Reduction behav-
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 69, 446 (1947). ior of uranium in the presence of citric acid,’’ Radiochim. Acta,
5) L. Sipos, L. J. Jeftic, M. Branica, et al., ‘‘Electrochemical 94, 579 (2006).
redox mechanism of uranium in acidic perchlorate solutions,’’ 14) J. Selbin, J. D. Ortego, ‘‘The chemistry of uranium(V),’’ Chem.
J. Electroanal. Chem., 32, 35 (1971). Rev., 69, 657 (1969).
6) K. Mizuguchi, Y. Y. Park, H. Tomiyasu, et al., ‘‘Electrochem- 15) H. Imai, ‘‘Reaction rate and electron transfer mechanism in
ical and spectroelectrochemical studies on uranyl carbonato disproportionation reaction of uranium (V),’’ Bull. Chem.
and aqua complexes,’’ J. Nucl. Sci. Technol., 30, 542 (1993). Soc. Jap., 30, 873 (1957).
Downloaded by [WARSZAWSKI UNIWERSYTET MEDYCZNY- BIBLIOT] at 07:21 24 February 2015
7) K. A. Kraus, F. Nelson, G. L. Johnson, ‘‘Chemistry of aqueous 16) S. Kihara, ‘‘Analytical chemical studies on electrode processes
uranium(V) solutions. I. Preparation and properties. Analogy by column coulometry, II. Studies on the electrode processes
between uranium(V), neptunium(V) and plutonium(V),’’ of uranium and plutonium in aqueous solutions,’’ Electroanal.
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 71, 2510 (1949). Chem. Interfacial Electrochem., 45, 45 (1973).
8) K. A. Kraus, F. Nelson, ‘‘Chemistry of aqueous uranium(V) 17) R. M. Smith, E. Martell, Critical stability Constants, Vol. 6,
solutions. II. Reaction of uranium pentachloride with water. Plenum Press, New York (1989).
Thermosynamic stability of UO2 þ . Potential of U(IV)/(V), 18) L. Meites, Polarographic Techniques, 2nd ed., Wiley, New
U(IV)/(VI) and U(V)/(VI) couples,’’ J. Am. Chem. Soc., 71, York (1965).
2517 (1949). 19) S. Y. Kim, H. Tomiyasu, Y. Ikeda, ‘‘Electorocemical studies
9) G. H. Tishkoff, Pharmacology and Toxicology of Uranium on [UO2 (DMF)5 ](ClO4 )2 , UO2 (acac)2 DMF, and
Compounds, McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York (1949). UO2 (salen)DMF (DMF=N, N-dimethylformamide, acac=ace-
10) D. Ferri, I. Grenthe, F. Salvatore, ‘‘Studies on metal carbonate tylacetonate, salen=N, N0 -disalicylideneethylenediaminate)
equilibriums. 7. Reduction of the tris(carbonato)dioxouranate complexes in DMF,’’ J. Nucl. Sci. Technol., 39, 160 (2002).
(VI) ion, UO2 (CO3 )3 4 , in carbonate solutions,’’ Inorg. Chem., 20) O. Tochiyama, Y. Inoue, S. Narita, ‘‘Complex formation of
22, 3162 (1983). Np(V) with various carboxylates,’’ Radiochim. Acta, 58/59,
11) C. E. Plock, F. J. Miner, ‘‘Polarographic behavior of uranium 129 (1992).