HEADING OF SENTENCING IN SESSION CASE

IN THE COURT OF SESSION JUDGE, LUCKNOW

Present:- Shri S.M Singh

Session Judge, Lucknow

Session Case No- 1108 of 12

u/s 302/379 of IPC

STATE of Uttar Pradesh

Versus

Mr. Aarsh Raj

SENTENCE ORDER
After evalution of evidence on record and pronouncing the conviction order u/s 302/379 of IPC,
1860 against the accused persons namely Aarsh Raj. The court has hereby opened the court onto
the prosecution and defence to produces their senstensing argument.
Ld. Counsel for the state demanding the life imprionment for both the accused as the conduct of
the accused that is harming the law and order in the society and if any greater and severe
punishment is being awarded, then, it will create an example in the society which would deter
such heinous crimes to be committed further. The above evidence that have been produced was
sufficient to prove that the conduct of the accused was done deliberatley with highest intention to
commit the crime. And hence no linenecy would be shown.
Ld. Counsel for the defence demanding that the less qunatum of punishment should be granted as
accused himself plead guity and helped the court to come to the conclusion. Also, the accused is
a student of 22 years and currently pursuing his Undergraduate course from Kapnur University.
So some sort of linenecy must be shown.
After listnening to all the above arguments, the court has come to the finding that under section
302, the accused persons are convicted for life improsenment and under section 301, the accused
persons are convicted for 3 years of improsenment. The improsenment order is passed
consecutively.
Leave granted. Appleal allowed.

(Shri. S.M Singh)

Session Judge, Lucknow