Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Dear READER,
This is a brief explanation about Scientific Research. These initial pages contain some basic concepts.
Next pages you can find elements to classify a research concerning: (1) Nature, (2) Objectives, (3) Approach
and (4) Methods and Techniques.
I. First classification (nature) category is related with outcomes or main purpose. Refers to
basic features and characteristic: Basic (as a base for another research) or Applied
resulting in a product or solving a problem).
II. The second category refers to objectives and the way of outcomes are presented
(exploratory, descriptive, explanatory). It’s the specific result to achieve.
III. On third category you’ll find the “approach” that means how to get closer to objectives
and goals. It refers to use quantitative, qualitative or mixed attitude. In both cases
researcher must be rigorous and follow normative procedures and data. It’s usually to say
that quantitate results are observer’ independent (positivism) although qualitative has a
meaning due to observer interpretation (interpretivism). You can find more information
from Burrell and Morgan (1999, p.22) and Morgan (1980, p.14).
IV. Last category (methods and techniques) represents the systematic work and how to act
or conduct experiments to reach more effective and efficient results. Linked to techniques
you’ll find tools to be used.
All you’ll see here is a concise description of science methodology. Please use full references for deep
and further information if you want to achieve productivity improvement. After reading you’ll find there is
no consensus or “THERE'S NO ONE SIZE FITS ALL”; all the way, this is a first step and an interesting beginning
for science research, informing main concepts according several authors.
When defining a methodology section of your publication you should (a) classify the research using
these categories and (b) describe in detail the steps of the path to reach your results. This is the system to
tell other people how to (step by step) get same results (or not).
Sincerely
tabajara@ifsc.edu.br
55 (48) 999 636363 BRAZIL
tabajara.tv
Professor CLEVERSON TABAJARA VIANNA – Tabajara@ifsc.edu.br – RESEARCH SCIENCE SUMMARY 2
tabajara.tv
Professor CLEVERSON TABAJARA VIANNA – Tabajara@ifsc.edu.br – RESEARCH SCIENCE SUMMARY 3
Classifications
2 Objectives (cont.) 3 Approach
What is a Scientific Considering a straight
research? concept, it refers to a new Qualitative
Research represents a systematic progress of science, preceding The natural environment is a direct
evaluation and collection of data, the research that will still source for data collection,
using defined and documented come. interpretation of phenomena and
Notice that in general the attribution of Meanings.
methods. It is organized in
"exploratory phase" of any It is an approach for exploring and
purpose do clear question and get
research is confused with an understanding the meaning
answers. Research is conduct by individuals or groups ascribe to a
researchers to prove hypothesis, "exploratory research".
social or human problem.
solve a problem or a certainty Has an inductive style, a focus on
about a specific phenomenon.
Descriptive
individual meaning, and the
It registers and describes the
1 Nature of importance of rendering the
observed facts without complexity of a situation. (CRESWELL,
Investigation interfering on them. Describes 2015;2016; Mayer, 2015; Esterberg,
the characteristics of a given 2002)
Basic - It does not have population or phenomenon;
immediate purposes and usually Establishes relationships Quantitative
produces knowledge or data to be
between variables. It requires the use of statistical resources
used in another research. and techniques, seeking to translate into
It involves the use of standard
Applied - For immediate data collection techniques: numbers the knowledge Generated by
the researcher.
purposes, it generates products, Questionnaire and systematic is an approach for testing objective
processes or solutions. observation. theories by examining the relationship
A case can be the “Ex post among variables. These variables, in turn,
2 Objectives facto Research” for descriptive can be measured (CRESWELL, 1998).
In general, is about testing theories
research Studies.
Exploratory deductively, building in protections
against bias, controlling for alternative
Phase Preliminary Research, for Explanatory explanations, and being able to generalize
the purpose of obtaining more It explains the causes, based and replicate the findings.
information (delimitation of a on the record, analysis,
theme) on a subject (with little or classification and
Mixed Approach
no knowledge). It will guide the interpretation of the observed Researching with a Mixed methods
objectives, methods and the phenomena. It identifies approach involves collecting both
formulation of the research factors that contribute to the quantitative and qualitative data,
questions or even give a new integrating the two forms of data, and
occurrence of phenomena;
using distinct designs that may involve
focus. "Deepens the knowledge of
philosophical assumptions and
It generally uses bibliographic reality because it explains theoretical frameworks. The focus of
research and case studies and Reason, why things. (GIL, this form of inquiry is to reach a
involves usually: 2010, p. 28). combination of qualitative and
Bibliographical survey; Interviews Natural sciences use this quantitative approaches in purpose
and Analysis of examples. method, and, in the social to provides a full understanding of a
sciences, the observational research problem. Of course, it
method is manly applied. should be better than each one alone
(CRESWELL, 2015;2016)
tabajara.tv
Professor CLEVERSON TABAJARA VIANNA – Tabajara@ifsc.edu.br – RESEARCH SCIENCE SUMMARY 4
tabajara.tv
Professor CLEVERSON TABAJARA VIANNA – Tabajara@ifsc.edu.br – RESEARCH SCIENCE SUMMARY 5
tabajara.tv
Professor CLEVERSON TABAJARA VIANNA – Tabajara@ifsc.edu.br – RESEARCH SCIENCE SUMMARY 6
Questionnaires can be
Data Collection fully structured (usually is a
COMMENTS:
Techniques choice among answers), semi
As we can observe, Research is a
or non-structured, depending
term used liberally for any kind of
on the liberty level of
Data-collection techniques means a responses. Interviews investigation that is intended to
systematic collection of uncover interesting or new facts.
information about the study object. Interviews are There are a large range of tools
Data are collected in purpose to usually carried out in face-to-
and techniques used for different
reach conclusive answer research face mode, but it can be done
enquiry that are applied in a
questions about phenomena, by using real-time
research.
objects or people. technological resources.
Questionnaires are useful for Adequate and precise research
Data can be obtained by observing,
driving interviews. methods will give reliable
Interviewing, questionnaires, focus
Usually in interviews a
group discussions, etc. solutions. There are specific
questionnaire or a guide is used.
methods used for collecting and
As respondents has analyzing data in practical issues.
Survey, Interview &
different levels, types of There are also clear and
Questionnaire (method) qualifications, questions must attractive presentation data style
be easily understandable to all The nature of research problem,
A survey commonly has a respondents. There are ‘open- kind of data to be treated will
theoretical clarification, a ended’ and ‘closed’ questions advise appropriate type of
hypothesis to be tested or even an and answers. An open-ended research and collecting data. A
idea to be explored. Are the most question leaves the procedure is applied in collecting,
common technique of research respondent entirely free and processing and analysand data.
from academic, industry or should leave sufficient space By using processes and
government area. Is fully or time to answer. On the procedures is possible to define
associated to quantitative other side, close questions variable relationships
methods, implies in same show a scale or categories to
questions and order, contrasting be chosen (and even “none” There are four main types of
with Interviewing and other option). These are a large quantitative research designs:
unobtrusive options. variety of scales and can be descriptive, correlational, quasi-
The survey involves direct built from attitudes to a list of experimental and experimental.
interrogation (through a products or services. Likert The differences between the four
questionnaire) to a group of scale is a very useful option int types primarily relates to the
people whose behavior is being this case. degree the researcher designs for
researched. The interviews may be There are also control of the variables in the
unstructured or made through interdependent questions or experiment. Surveys and polls for
questionnaires and these are filtered questions, like: if “yes” example, are preferable data
classified as structured and semi- go to questions xx; ‘skip’ if collection tools used in
structured. condition. Be aware if you are quantitative research.
not conductions the interview
Questionnaires are a good or questionnaire, is up to the Technology is a great support
way to obtain information from respondents choose the order and a survey can be answered on
many people and/or people who they like, not in a logical order mobile phones, emails or an
may not have the time to attend you planned for. Internet accessing an internet address
an interview. Polling is also a practical (URL).
Questionnaires typically contain instrument.
multiple choice questions, attitude
scales, closed questions and open-
ended questions.
tabajara.tv
Professor CLEVERSON TABAJARA VIANNA – Tabajara@ifsc.edu.br – RESEARCH SCIENCE SUMMARY 7
tabajara.tv
Professor CLEVERSON TABAJARA VIANNA – Tabajara@ifsc.edu.br – RESEARCH SCIENCE SUMMARY 8
tabajara.tv
Professor CLEVERSON TABAJARA VIANNA – Tabajara@ifsc.edu.br – RESEARCH SCIENCE SUMMARY 9
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Bardin, Laurence. Análise de Conteúdo. Tradução Luiz Antonio Reto e Agusto Pnheiro. Portugal. Edições 70.
Bazeley, P. (2012). Integrative analysis strategies for mixed data sources. American Behavioral Scientist, 56, 814-828.
doi:10.1177/0002764211426330
Bowen, G. A. (2005). Preparing a qualitative research-based dissertation: Lessons learned. The qualitative report, 10(2), 208-222.
Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27-40.
doi:10.3316/QRJ0902027
Bryman, A. (2006). Integrating quantitative and qualitative research: How is it done? Qualitative Inquiry, 6, 97-113.
Bryman A. (2007). Barriers to integrating quantitative and qualitative research. J Mixed Methods Res. 2007;1(1):8-22.
BURRELL, Gibson; MORGAN, Gareth. (1979). Sociological paradigms and organisational analysis: Elements of the sociology of
corporate life. Routledge, 1979.
Castillo-Davis, C. I., & Hartl, D. L. (2003). GeneMerge—post-genomic analysis, data mining, and hypothesis testing.
Bioinformatics, 19(7), 891-892.
CERVO, A. L. BERVIAN, P. A. (2002). Metodologia científica. 5.ed. São Paulo: Prentice Hall, 2002.
Colton, D., & Covert, R. W. (2007). Designing and constructing instruments for social research and evaluation. John Wiley &
Sons.
Cornelis, R., Caruso, J. A., Crews, H., & Heumann, K. G. (2004). Handbook of elemental speciation: techniques and
methodology. John Wiley & Sons.
Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Creswell, J. W., and V. L. Plano Clark. (2011). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
Publications, Inc.
Creswell, J. W. (2015). A concise introduction to mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Creswell, J. W. (2016). Reflections on the MMIRA the future of mixed methods task force report.
Esterberg, K. G. (2002). Qualitative methods in social research. McGraw-Hill Boston, MA
Easterby-Smith, M., Thorpe, R., & Lowe, A. (1991). Management research: an introduction. London: Sage.
Erasmus Research Institute of Management. (2003). ERIM journals list 2003. Retrieved February 15, 2005, from
http://www.erim.eur.nl/erim/publications/ejl/welcome.html
Fetters, M. D., Curry, L. A., & Creswell, J. W. (2013). Achieving integration in mixed methods designs—principles and practices.
Health services research, 48(6pt2), 2134-2156.
Financial Times. (2003). FTs journals ranking list 2003. Retrieved October 2, 2005, from http://www.ft.com
Gage, N. L. (1989). The paradigm wars and their aftermath a “historical” sketch of research on teaching since 1989. Educational
researcher, 18(7), 4-10.
GIL, A. C. (2008);Métodos e técnicas de pesquisa social. 6ª ed. São Paulo: Atlas, 2008.
Gil, A. C. (2010). Como elaborar projetos de pesquisa. 5ª ed. São Paulo: Atlas.
Gibbert, M., Ruigrok, W., & Wicki, B. (2008). What passes as a rigorous case study? Strategic management journal, 29(13),
1465-1474.
Ivankova NV, Kawamura Y. (20xx). Emerging trends in the utilization of integrated designs in the social, behavioral, and health
sciences. In: Tashakkori A, Teddlie C, eds. Sage Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research. 2nd ed.
Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2010:581-611.
Jonker, J., & Pennink, B. (2010). The essence of research methodology: A concise guide for master and PhD students in
management science. Springer Science & Business Media.
Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis: an introduction to its methodology (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
LAKATOS, Eva Maria; MARCONI, Marina de Andrade. Fundamentos de metodologia científica. 5ª ed. São Paulo: Atlas, 2003.
Liamputtong, P., & Ezzy, D. (2005). Qualitative research methods (Vol. 2). Melbourne: Oxford university press.
Little, J. D. (2004). Models and managers: The concept of a decision calculus. Management science, 50(12_supplement), 1841-
1853.
tabajara.tv
Professor CLEVERSON TABAJARA VIANNA – Tabajara@ifsc.edu.br – RESEARCH SCIENCE SUMMARY 10
Magarey, J. M. (2001). Elements of a systematic review. International Journal of Nursing Practice, 7(6), 376-382.
Malhotra, N. K., Birks, D. F., & Wills, P. (2013). Essentials of marketing research. Harlow: Pearson.
MARTINS, G. de A. (1994). Manual para elaboração de monografias e dissertações. 2.ed. São Paulo: Atlas, 1994.
Maxwell, J. A. (2013). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Mayer, I. (2015). Qualitative research with a focus on qualitative data analysis. International Journal of Sales, Retailing &
Marketing, 4(9), 53-67.
Mazza, R., & Berre, A. (2007). Focus group methodology for evaluating information visualization techniques and tools. In 2007
11th International Conference Information Visualization (IV'07) (pp. 74-80). IEEE.
MORGAN, Gareth. (1980). Paradigms, metaphors, and puzzle solving in organization theory. Administrative science quarterly, p.
605-622, 1980.
O’Cathain A, Murphy E, Nicholl J. (2008). The quality of mixed methods studies in health services research. J Health Serv Res
Policy. 2008; 13(2):92-98.
Patton, M. Q. (1980). Qualitative evaluation methods.
Pedhazur, E. J., & Schmelkin, L. P. (2013). Measurement, design, and analysis: An integrated approach. Psychology Press.
Pettigrew, T. F., Tropp, L. R., Wagner, U., & Christ, O. (2011). Recent advances in intergroup contact theory. International
journal of intercultural relations, 35(3), 271-280.
Plano Clark VL. The adoption and practice of mixed methods: U.S. trends in federally y funded health-related research. Qual Inq.
2010;16(6):428-440
Podsakoff, P. M., Mackenzie, S. B., Bachrach, D. G., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2005). The influence of management journals in the
1980s and 1990s. Strategic Management Journal, 26(5), 473-488.
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Podsakoff, N. P., & Bachrach, D. G. (2008). Scholarly influence in the field of management:
A bibliometric analysis of the determinants of university and author impact in the management literature in the past quarter
century. Journal of Management, 34(4), 641-720.
PRODANOV, Cleber Cristiano. FREITAS, Ernani Cesar de. Metodologia do trabalho científico [recurso eletrônico]: métodos e
técnicas da pesquisa e do trabalho acadêmico. 2. ed. Novo Hamburgo: Feevale, 2013.
Rosenthal, R. (1986). Meta-Analytic Procedures for Social Science Research Sage Publications: Beverly Hills, 1984, 148 pp.
Educational Researcher, 15(8), 18-20.
Rosenthal, R., & Dimatteo, M. R. (2001). Meta-analysis: recent developments in quantitative methods for literature reviews.
Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 59-82.
Saint Arnault, D., and M. D. Fetters. (2011). “RO1 Funding for Mixed Methods Research: Lessons Learned from the “Mixed‐
Method Analysis of Japanese Depression” Project.” Journal of Mixed Methods Research 5 (4): 309– 29.
Slavin, R. E. (1983). Cooperative Learning. Research on Teaching Monograph Series. Longman Inc., College Division, 1560
Broadway, New York, NY 10036.
Sokal, R. R., & Rohlf, F. J. (1962). The comparison of dendrograms by objective methods. Taxon, 11(2), 33-40.
Stake, R. (1995). The Art of Case Study Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
THIOLLENT, M. (1998). Metodologia da pesquisa-ação. 8. ed. São Paulo: Cortez, 1998.
TRUJILLO FERRARI, A. (1974). Metodologia da ciência. 3. ed. Rio de Janeiro: Kennedy, 1974.
Valiela, I., & Martinetto, P. (2005). The relative ineffectiveness of bibliographic search engines. Bioscience, 55(8), 688-692.
Valiela, I., & Martinetto, P. (2005). The relative ineffectiveness of bibliographic search engines. Bioscience, 55(8), 688-692.
YIN, Robert K. (2009); Case study research: Design and methods (applied social research methods). London and Singapore: Sage,
2009.
Zhao, D., & Strotmann, A. (2008). Evolution of research activities and intellectual influences in information science 1996–2005:
Introducing author bibliographic‐coupling analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and
Technology, 59(13), 2070-2086.
tabajara.tv
Professor CLEVERSON TABAJARA VIANNA – Tabajara@ifsc.edu.br – RESEARCH SCIENCE SUMMARY 11
Index
tabajara.tv