Rain Degradation:

Its Implications For Satellite Communication

Robert Nelson
Via Satellite, feb 2003
(http://www.visatsatellite.com)

INTRODUCTION
To be successful, a satellite service must be competitive with a terrestrial
alternative if one is available. The level of service must equal or exceed the
terrestrial service at a comparable cost if the satellite solution is to gain
acceptance among potential customers.

When there are two alternatives, the choice of a satellite system will involve
considerations of cost, the amount of user equipment, ease of use and
reliability. For example, a potential broadband customer would have an
expectation of an affordable subscription rate, convenient installation, superior
performance and high availability. One of the factors that affects availability in a
satellite communication link is rain.

The presence of rain can have a significant detrimental effect on the

propagation of an electromagnetic signal. The rain degradation increases as the
frequency increases. At C-band (6/4 GHz), rain has little effect, except for brief
periods of unusually heavy rain, but at Ku-band (14/12 GHz) it can be important.
Nevertheless, typical rain margins on the order of 7 dB can be allocated to
accommodate rain loss at Ku-band in most geographic regions to ensure
availability comparable to that of C-band. At higher frequencies in Ka-band
(30/20 GHz), rain can have a very large effect that simply cannot be overcome
at the usual levels of availability. The result is that the availability will be
reduced. This fact must be taken into consideration when designing a Ka-band
satellite system to provide a service that will be widely used and accepted.

ATTENUATION ISSUES
The principal effect of rain is attenuation. A passing electromagnetic wave gives
up energy to the liquid in a raindrop. The loosely bound molecules of water
absorb energy from the electromagnetic wave, which in effect slightly heats the
raindrop. Water in solid form, such as snow or ice, produces no attenuation, as
the molecules of the crystals are tightly bound together and do not resonate
with the passing wave.

The amount of attenuation increases as the density of the rain increases and as
the wavelength of the electromagnetic wave approaches the size of a typical
raindrop. The wavelength is equal to the speed of light (3 x 108 m/s) divided by
the frequency, while the average diameter of a raindrop is about 1.5 mm. At the
downlink C-band frequency of 4 GHz, the wavelength is 75 mm. Thus the
wavelength is 50 times the average diameter of a raindrop and the waves pass
through the rain virtually without interaction.
Robert Nelson Rain Degradation:Its
2 Implications For Satellite Communication
Via Satellite, feb 2003

At the Ku-band downlink frequency of 12 GHz, the wavelength is 25 mm. Here

the ratio of wavelength to raindrop diameter is still fairly large, but yet is one-
third the value at C-band. Consequently, there is an interaction that can result in
a noticeable absorption of energy. The received carrier power will decrease and
the bit error rate of a digital signal will increase. Direct broadcast television
customers in Florida are familiar with the degradation or loss of picture during a
heavy rainstorm, which can be detected on the television long before the storm
actually arrives.

At the Ka-band downlink frequency of 20 GHz, the wavelength is 15 mm. At this

frequency, the wavelength is only 10 times the size of a raindrop. Therefore,
there is a significant exchange of energy between the passing electromagnetic
waves and the rain and a corresponding significant attenuation of the satellite
signal. As the wavelength approaches 1.5 mm, the attenuation continues to
increase and theoretically becomes maximum at a frequency of 200 GHz.

Figure 1 on page 26 shows how the specific attenuation, or attenuation per

kilometer, varies with rain rate and frequency. The rain rate is a measure of the
number of raindrops per unit volume. A rain rate of 25 mm/h would correspond
approximately to an availability of 99.95 percent in Washington, DC. For this
rain rate, the specific attenuation at 4 GHz is only 0.02 dB/km. Thus assuming a
typical effective path length of 5 km through the rain layer, the attenuation is 0.1
dB, which is negligible. However, for the same rain rate at 12 GHz the specific
attenuation is 1.0 dB and the total attenuation is roughly 5 dB. Consequently,
the received carrier power would be less than one-third what it would be with a
clear sky. The link budget would have to accommodate a rain loss of this
magnitude.

At 20 GHz, the specific attenuation is somewhat less than 3 dB/km and the total
attenuation is roughly 12 dB, or more than a factor of 15. A margin of this
magnitude would be impractical. If a more reasonable margin of about 7 dB
were allocated, then according to the graph, the maximum allowable rain rate at
20 GHz would be reduced to around 15 mm/h. This implies that the received
signal strength would be maintained at the necessary level for a smaller
percentage of rainfall situations.

SYSTEM TEMPERATURE
The second mechanism for rain degradation is an increase in system
temperature. The system temperature is a measure of the total noise in the
receiver. Just as the thermodynamic temperature of the air is a macroscopic
measure of the average kinetic energy of the air molecules on the microscopic
scale, the system temperature is a measure of the average energy of electrons
moving randomly within the receiver. The system temperature at the output
terminals of an antenna is equal to the antenna noise temperature plus the
equivalent temperature of the chain of components in the receiver, including the
low noise amplifier (LNA), the down converter and other elements. The key
parameter that describes the receive antenna is the so-called "figure of merit,"
or ratio of antenna gain to system temperature G/T.

-2-
Robert Nelson Rain Degradation:Its
3 Implications For Satellite Communication
Via Satellite, feb 2003

On the downlink, the clear sky noise temperature of an earth station antenna is
roughly 25 K. If a typical receiver equivalent temperature is about 125 K, the
overall clear sky system temperature for a small antenna might be
approximately 150 K. When it rains however, the antenna sees the warm rain at
a temperature of 300 K. Thus the overall system temperature increases. This
increase in system temperature can cause a degradation in G/T that is of the
same order of magnitude as the rain attenuation itself.

On the uplink, the satellite antenna is directed toward a large area of the warm
Earth and has a noise temperature of 300 K anyway. The total system
temperature of a satellite receiver might be about 700 K. Thus the uplink is
affected only by attenuation, which is higher than the downlink attenuation
because of the higher frequency.

POLARIZATION ISSUES
In addition to attenuation, rain affects the polarization of satellite signals. There
are two forms of polarization: linear and circular. For linear polarization, the
electric field in a signal transmitted from a satellite may oscillate either in a
vertical direction or in a horizontal direction relative to the equatorial plane. For
circular polarization, the electric field rotates in either the clockwise or
counterclockwise directions. The purpose of using either two linear or two
circular polarizations is to double the data rate capacity permitted within a given
bandwidth. It should be noted that, as seen from the earth station, the vertical
and horizontal linear polarizations are not only both rotated with respect to the
local horizon, but they are also not precisely orthogonal (unless the earth station
is at the same longitude as the satellite).

The source of rain degradation is the change in polarization angle. A falling

raindrop is not spherical. Rather, the viscous forces of the air cause it to be
flattened into an oblate spheroid. The orientation of the axis of the raindrop is in
general not vertical, but has a statistical distribution with an average cant angle
of about 25°. Consequently, the transmission path through the raindrop is
different for different polarizations and the polarization of the received signal is
altered. For a fixed LNA orientation, the polarization mismatch results in a loss
on the order of a few tenths of a dB. Thus, this loss is small but measurable.
Some antennas can automatically maintain the proper polarization alignment.

AVAILABILITY
A geographic area is divided into rain climate regions characterized by the
probability of a given rain rate being exceeded. The rain regions for the United
States are illustrated in Figure 2 on page 26. For example, Washington, New
York and Chicago are in region D2 and Miami is in region E. The significant
quantity is the maximum rain rate, not the annual rainfall. Thus San Francisco
and Seattle are both in region C, which at first glance might seem paradoxical.
Although it may rain often in Seattle and much less frequently in San Francisco,
the likelihood of it raining hard, however, is about the same in both cities.

-3-
Robert Nelson Rain Degradation:Its
4 Implications For Satellite Communication
Via Satellite, feb 2003

The maximum rain rate, the frequency and the effective path length through the
rain layer determine the rain loss. The effective path length is not a geometric
length, but is rather a statistical quantity that is characterized by the manner in
which the rain distribution data are taken into account in a particular model. The
two authoritative models that are commonly used are the Crane model,
developed by Robert Crane of the University of Oklahoma, and the ITU-R
(formerly CCIR) model, created by a committee of the Radiocommunication
Sector of the International Telecommunication Union. These models differ
slightly by the boundaries of rain regions and the calculation of the effective
path length.

The basic Crane model, published in a journal of the Institute of Electrical and
Electronics Engineers (IEEE) in 1980, is known as the global model. It has been
enhanced by the two-component model, which takes into account the distinction
between the core rain area and the fringe area within a rain cell. This model is
described in Crane's recent book, Electromagnetic Wave Propagation Through
Rain (Wiley 1996). A comparison of rain degradation at the downlink
frequencies of 4 GHz, 12 GHz, and 20 GHz for rain region D2 and rain region E
and various availabilities is made in the Table on page 28 based on the Crane
global model using software that accompanies the book.

For example, for an availability of 99.90 percent in region D2 (such as in

Washington, DC), the maximum rain rate is 15.2 mm/h. This means that the
probability of the specified rain rate being exceeded is 0.10 percent,
corresponding to a total time of 8.77 hours per year that is divided into random
increments occurring at random times. At the Ku-band downlink frequency of 12
GHz, the rain attenuation is 2.8 dB and the decrease in receive antenna figure
of merit is 2.7 dB, implying a total degradation of 5.5 dB. In region E (such as in
Miami), the total degradation is 11.6 dB, an increase of about 6 dB or a factor of
four.

To compensate for this loss, the diameter of the receive antenna would have to
be doubled. For example, instead of the standard 45cm (18 inch) dish
commonly used for direct broadcast television, the antenna size would have to
be nearly 1 meter to maintain the same availability. Therefore, unless a larger
antenna was used, the availability for the same rain loss would be reduced to
99.6 percent. This fact of nature explains the occasional dissatisfaction of DBS
customers in Florida.

At Ka-band the rain problem is much worse. For a similar rain margin of 5.7 dB
in region D2, the availability is reduced to 99.6 percent and in region E it is
much less. With a higher margin of 8.4 dB, the availability in region D2 could be
increased to 99.8 percent. The experimental Ka-band Advanced
Communications Technology Satellite launched by NASA on the Space Shuttle
STS-51 in September 1993 has contributed much to knowledge of rainfall
propagation effects and has made possible many of the commercial Ka-band
projects now in development.

-4-
Robert Nelson Rain Degradation:Its
5 Implications For Satellite Communication
Via Satellite, feb 2003

METHODS OF MITIGATION
Rain loss at Ka-band can be mitigated, but it cannot be totally compensated.
One technique is site diversity. Two earth stations separated by a distance of
about 15 km to 30 km and connected by a terrestrial link can be used. It is
unlikely that both earth stations would experience the same rain intensity
simultaneously.

Another technique is to reserve bandwidth to permit more robust Forward Error

Correction coding that will maintain the same bit error rate at the specified bit
rate at a lower carrier power. In addition, the bit rate itself may be lowered
below the nominal value during periods of heavy rain.

Another possibility is the selective allocation of an alternative frequency, such

as Ku-band, as needed in areas encountering rain at a particular time. The rain
degradation at Ku-band could be within the allocated margin even though the
margin was exceeded at Ka-band.

RAIN AND FUTURE SATELLITE PROJECTS

The effects of rain can have a significant impact on satellite communication,
especially at the relatively high frequencies of Ka-band now being considered
for new satellite systems, such as broadband service. Among the many
business considerations involved in the design of such systems, the availability
in the presence of rain is an important issue in estimating customer acceptance.
This issue is particularly important when there is a terrestrial alternative
providing a similar service.

Robert A. Nelson is Via Satellite's Technical Editor.

-5-