Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Immunofluorescence Staining PDF
Immunofluorescence Staining PDF
3
Julie G. Donaldson1
1
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda,
Maryland
Microscopy
Additional reagents and equipment for trypsinization of cells (UNIT 1.1, Phelan and
May, 2015)
NOTE: All solutions and equipment coming into contact with live cells must be sterile,
and aseptic technique should be used accordingly.
1. For adherent cells, 1 to 2 days prior to experiment trypsinize cells and seed onto
10-cm culture dishes, each containing 15 to 20 sterilized coverslips, so that on day
of experiment cells are 20% to 50% confluent.
Nonadherent cells can be coaxed into adhering to the coverslips by precoating the
coverslip with poly-L-lysine (see recipe). Apply 10 to 20 μl of suspended cells to each
coverslip, let sit 10 min, then proceed with fixation (step 3).
Alternatively, cells can be attached to coverslips using a cytocentrifuge by following the
manufacturer’s instructions.
4.3.2
Supplement 69 Current Protocols in Cell Biology
4. Aspirate formaldehyde fixative and wash coverslips twice, each time by adding 1
ml PBS, pH 7.4, letting stand 5 min, then aspirating PBS. Add 1 ml PBS/FBS to
the fixed coverslips and let stand 10 to 20 min to block nonspecific sites of antibody
adsorption.
Throughout the procedure, do not let cells dry out.
10. Carefully pick up each inverted coverslip and flip it over so that it is cell-side-up,
then place in a well of a 12-well plate. Wash each coverslip three times to remove
unbound antibody, each time by adding 1 ml PBS/FBS, letting stand 5 min, then
aspirating solution.
11. Dilute fluorophore-conjugated secondary antibodies in 0.1% saponin/PBS/FBS.
Mix, then microcentrifuge as in step 7 to remove aggregates.
Typically, commercial preparations are diluted between 1:100 and 1:500.
4.3.3
Current Protocols in Cell Biology Supplement 69
13. Wash coverslips as in step 10. After removal of last PBS/FBS wash, add 1 ml PBS.
14. Label slides and place 1 drop of mounting medium onto slide. Pick up coverslip
from well, gently blot off excess PBS by touching the edge to a Kimwipe, then
invert coverslip, cell-side-down, onto drop. Gently blot mounted coverslip with
paper towel, then seal edge of coverslip onto slide by painting the edge with a rim
of nail polish. Let dry.
The fixed, mounted, and nail-polish-sealed coverslips can be stored in the dark for 6 to
12 months at 4°C.
15. View specimen on fluorescence microscope using a 63× oil immersion objective.
Formaldehyde, 2%
In a chemical fume hood, dilute 2 ml 37% reagent-grade formaldehyde in 35 ml
PBS (see recipe), pH 7.4
Store 1 month at room temperature
As reagent-grade formaldehyde contains 11% methanol, as an alternative (or if necessary)
make up formaldehyde from paraformaldehyde by dissolving 0.4 g paraformaldehyde powder
in 10 ml H2 O that has been heated to 60°C, then diluting 1:1 with 2× PBS, pH 7.4. It might
be desirable to try both procedures for preparing the formaldehyde solution and see which
gives better results.
Mounting medium
Use Fluormount G (SouthernBiotech) or prepare 50% (w/v) glycerol and 0.1%
(w/v) p-phenylenediamine in PBS (see recipe), pH 8.0
Store indefinitely at room temperature
Poly-L-lysine-coated coverslips
Apply 25 μl 1 mg/ml poly-L-lysine to each sterilized no. 1 coverslip in a hood and
allow to stand 10 min. Carefully rinse coverslips three times with water, then allow
to air dry. Store indefinitely at room temperature.
COMMENTARY
Background Information component in any study. Immunofluorescence
The first use of fluorescently labeled anti- labeling is quite effective when combined
bodies to localize a protein in cells occurred with biochemical or ultrastructural studies
over 50 years ago (see Coons, 1961, for a rem- (Harford and Bonifacino, 2011) because the
iniscence). Since that time, the wide availabil- technique is rapid and so many parameters
ity of numerous antibodies and improvements can be assessed. Furthermore, in contrast to
in indirect labeling methods and fluorophores biochemical studies, which assume uniformity
Immunofluorescence has made immunofluorescent localization of of the sample, immunofluorescence technique
Staining proteins in cells both a routine and a vital allows analysis of individual cell differences.
4.3.4
Supplement 69 Current Protocols in Cell Biology
Immunofluorescence labeling has been In addition to saponin, which the authors in-
employed in a variety of cell-biological clude throughout the staining procedure, treat-
studies, including the first description of ments after fixation with 0.2% to 0.5% Tri-
peptide targeting sequences specifying ton X-100 or SDS can also be tried. Often a
retention of endoplasmic reticulum (ER) short treatment with these reagents prior to an-
lumenal proteins (Munro and Pelham, 1987) tibody incubations is sufficient to expose the
and initial studies describing the dynamic epitope. Special attention should be directed
membrane trafficking between the ER and toward ensuring that the access to the epitope
Golgi complex (Lippincott-Schwartz et al., is the same even if the protein has undergone a
1990). The first study describing the family translocation; for example proteins that shut-
of Rab GTPases used immunofluorescence to tle between the cytoplasm and nucleus are not
demonstrate distinct localization of the dif- always equally accessible to antibody labeling
ferent Rabs to different organelles in the cell (Pines, 1997).
(Chavrier et al., 1990). Immunofluorescent The primary antibody should be purified
localization of proteins encoded by novel to the extent that it recognizes only the
genes, including those associated with human protein of interest on immunoblots. Although
diseases and cancer (Nathke et al., 1996), affinity purification often resolves this, be
provides critical information for determining aware that “affinity-purified” antibodies do
the cellular function of these proteins. More not always result in antibodies that recognize
recently, the immunolocalization of endoge- only a single protein. Especially in the case
nous proteins serves as an important control of anti-peptide antibodies, multiple bands
when fluorescent chimeric proteins are being are sometimes labeled even after affinity
expressed to study the dynamic behavior of the purification. By immunoblotting on a gel
protein of interest in living cells. Similar local- (UNIT 6.2, Gallagher et al., 2011), it is easy to
ization of the endogenous and over-expressed determine on the basis of molecular weight
protein indicates the approach is valid. whether it is the protein of interest that is
recognized. However, not all antibodies that
Critical Parameters can be used to detect a specific protein by im-
To ensure success with immunofluores- munoblotting work for immunofluorescence
cence, three parameters are critical—fixation, detection. Likewise, there are antibodies that
permeabilization, and determination of the recognize the protein by immunofluorescence
specificity of labeling. The fixation and per- that do not recognize the separated, denatured
meabilization conditions must be assessed in- proteins transferred to nitrocellulose.
dividually for each antibody and each cell type Next, it is important to be able to determine
investigated. Refer to Griffiths (1993) for an what constitutes “specific labeling” with the
excellent discussion on fixation and issues re- antibody. To assess this, control-stained slides
lated to specificity of antibody labeling. (incubated with secondary antibody only or
Different fixatives might be investigated to with preimmune serum) should first be viewed
optimize preservation of the antigen, its distri- to determine what constitutes “nonspecific
bution, and the morphology of other cellular staining.” Ideally this is negligible, and, by
constituents. For example, some epitopes are contrast, the staining pattern obtained with
lost upon aldehyde fixation but preserved with the specific antibody is much brighter and
alcohol fixation, and vice versa. Alternative more distinct. When initially characterizing
fixatives to try include methanol at –20°C immunolocalization using a particular anti-
(5-min exposure) or formaldehyde fixation body, a range of dilutions of the primary and
followed by a brief (1-min) exposure to secondary antibodies should be examined
methanol at 0°C. Methanol fixation is often to determine optimal concentrations that
quite effective for localizing cytoskeletal minimize nonspecific staining and maximize
elements. Alcohols work by extracting lipids specific staining. Minimal background
and precipitating remaining proteins, whereas staining from secondary antibodies can often
aldehydes are cross-linking reagents that be achieved by dilution or trying different
generally preserve membranous structures secondary antibodies made in different host
better (McCaffery and Farquhar, 1995). species or obtained from different commercial
Sometimes, even when material is appro- suppliers. Then, a dilution of the primary
priately fixed, the epitope is obscured and not antibody is selected to optimally label the
accessible to antibody binding. Permeabilizing specific protein. At this point, further controls
reagents are typically detergents that partially should be analyzed to ensure that the staining
Microscopy
denature fixed proteins, exposing the epitope. observed is due to the presence of the protein
4.3.5
Current Protocols in Cell Biology Supplement 69
Figure 4.3.1 Examples of immunofluorescence labeling of formaldehyde-fixed cells. (A) and (B)
Double labeling of a normal rat kidney cell with a mouse monoclonal antibody to (A) the β-COP
component of coatomer and (B) a rabbit polyclonal antibody to mannosidase II. (C) Distribution
of vinculin in a formaldehyde-fixed normal rat kidney cell using a mouse monoclonal antibody. (D)
Distribution of transferrin receptor in formaldehyde-fixed HeLa cells using a mouse monoclonal
antibody. Bar is equal to 10 μm.
of interest. If a rabbit antiserum is used, preim- used, e.g., 1% (w/v) BSA (immunoglobulin-
mune serum should yield a pattern of staining free) or gelatin.
similar to that of the secondary antibody If no specific staining is observed, it is pos-
alone. If the immunizing antigen is available, sible to increase the concentration or time of
it can be added to the antibody dilution to exposure to the primary antibody. One can also
compete for the specific staining; and it should try alternative fixation and permeabilization
yield “background” levels of fluorescence. regimens to visualize specific staining.
Lastly, support for specific staining can be If specific staining is observed, but it is very
confirmed by decreased labeling in a cell type dim, it is possible to increase the concentration
that does not express the protein of interest or of the primary and/or secondary antibodies.
in a cell where the protein has been depleted As long as background staining is low, the sig-
by small interfering RNA (siRNA), and by nal can be enhanced by using a fluorescence
increased labeling in cells overexpressing double-sandwich technique. To do this, fol-
the protein by transient transfection. Finally, lowing incubation with primary antibody (e.g.,
the use of different antibodies to the protein, a mouse monoclonal antibody) and washing,
if available, can independently confirm the incubate first in FITC-conjugated goat anti-
localization pattern. mouse IgG and then in FITC-conjugated don-
key anti-goat IgG. Caution should be observed
Troubleshooting that secondary antibodies do not alter the pat-
If background staining with secondary an- tern of single antibody labeling.
tibodies is too high, there are several possible
remedies. The secondary antibodies may be di- Anticipated Results
luted further, or different secondary antibod- Once conditions for specific localization
ies, different hosts, or different fluorophores have been optimized, the distribution of the
may be tried. Also, it is possible to try other protein in a variety of cells under a variety
“sorbing” reagents. PBS/FBS is generally a of conditions can be observed (see Fig. 4.3.1).
Immunofluorescence good sorbing reagent that effectively blocks Double labeling of two antigens allows the dis-
Staining
out nonspecific sites, but other agents can be tribution of one protein to be compared with
4.3.6
Supplement 69 Current Protocols in Cell Biology
that of another protein in the same sample us- tection. Curr. Protoc. Cell Biol. 52:6.2.1-6.2.28.
ing two secondary antibodies attached to fluo- doi: 10.1002/0471143030.cb0602s52
rophores that can be monitored in two different Griffiths, G. 1993. Fine Structure Immunocyto-
channels by flow cytometry. Thus, the location chemistry. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg.
of a known protein, say an antibody to a Golgi- Harford, J.B. and Bonifacino, J.S. 2011. Cur-
resident protein, can be used as a marker for rent Protocols in Cell Biology. Chapter 3,
the Golgi complex to see whether the anti- John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ. doi:
10.1002/0471143030.cb0300s52
gen under study colocalizes with it (Fig. 4.3.1,
panels A and B). Lippincott-Schwartz, J., Donaldson, J.G.,
Schweizer, A., Berger, E.G., Hauri, H.P., Yuan,
L.C., and Klausner, R.D. 1990. Microtubule-
Time Considerations dependent retrograde transport of proteins into
The entire procedure can be performed in the ER in the presence of brefeldin A suggests
3 hr. Fixed, washed coverslips can be stored an ER recycling pathway. Cell 60:821-836. doi:
at 4°C for several days prior to immunolabel- 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90096-W
ing. Incubations with primary antibodies can McCaffery, J.M. and Farquhar, M.G. 1995.
be extended to overnight at 4°C if necessary Localization of GTPases by indirect im-
munofluorescence and immunoelectron mi-
(or if it is desirable to increase staining). croscopy. Methods Enzymol. 257:259-279. doi:
10.1016/S0076-6879(95)57031-4
Disclaimer Munro, S. and Pelham, H.R.B. 1987. A C-
This article was written by Julie Donaldson terminal signal prevents secretion of lu-
in her private capacity. No official support or menal ER proteins. Cell 48:899-907. doi:
endorsement by the National Heart, Lung, and 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90086-9
Blood Institute (NHLBI) or National Institutes Nathke, I.S., Adams, C.L., Polakis, P., Sellin, J.H.,
of Health (NIH) is intended and none should and Nelson, W.J. 1996. The adenomatous poly-
be inferred. posis coli tumor suppressor protein localizes
to plasma membrane sites involved in active
cell migration. J. Cell Biol. 134:165-179. doi:
Literature Cited 10.1083/jcb.134.1.165
Chavrier, P., Parton, R.G., Hauri, H.P., Simons, K.,
and Zerial, M. 1990. Localization of low molec- Phelan, K. and May, K.M. 2015. Basic tech-
ular weight GTP binding proteins to exocytic niques in mammalian cell tissue culture.
and endocytic compartments. Cell 62:317-329. Curr. Protoc. Cell Biol. 66:1.1.1-1.1.22. doi:
doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90369-P 10.1002/0471143030.cb0101s66
Coons, A.H. 1961. The beginnings of immunofluo- Pines, J. 1997. Localization of cell cy-
rescence. J. Immunol. 87:499-503. cle regulators by immunofluorescence.
Methods Enzymol. 283:99-113. doi:
Gallagher, S., Winston, S.E., Fuller, S.A., and Hur- 10.1016/S0076-6879(97)83010-8
rell, J.G. 2011. Immunoblotting and immunode-
Microscopy
4.3.7
Current Protocols in Cell Biology Supplement 69