Professional Documents
Culture Documents
KEY WORDS: (Materials), (Magnesium Alloy), (Steel), (Dissimilar Joining), (Resistance Spot
Welding)
800
intermetallic layer of Fe-Al and Al-Mg were formed at the
joint interface. L + (αFe)
700
650℃ 649℃
1. Introduction 600
0.008
Reduction of fuel consumption and curbing carbon 0.00043
(Mg) + (αFe)
dioxide (CO2) emissions are key issues being tackled by the 500
automotive industry to resolve energy problems and the (Mg)
problem of global warming. Vigorous efforts are being 400
made to develop technologies for improving powertrain 0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1
efficiency [1] and for lightening the vehicle body [2] as Mg Atomic Percent Iron Fe
measures for addressing these issues. Material substitution
of light metals such as aluminum alloys, magnesium alloys Fig. 1 Mg-Fe binary phase diagram
for steel is an effective way to reduce the vehicle body
weight, and the establishment of effective techniques for 700
joining aluminum alloys and steel has been strongly desired
[3-5] Previously, we developed an effective method for 600
L
dissimilar joining of aluminum alloys and steel sheet by
resistance spot welding [6]. Further weight savings can be
Temperature (℃)
500
expected by applying magnesium alloys to the body at the ← (Mg)
416℃
381℃
view point of the strength-to-weight ratio. Proceeding from 341℃ 340.9℃ 347℃
400
the dissimilar joining of aluminum alloy and steel, we then ↓ 364℃
325℃ Mg51 Zn20
developed a dissimilar joining of magnesium alloy and
300
steel. (Zn)→
Mg2 Zn11
Mg 2 Zn 3
MgZn2
MgZn
200
2. Dissimilar materials joining concept for magnesium
alloys and steel
100
Figure. 1 shows a binary phase diagrams of Mg and 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Fe. The Mg and Fe system has an almost complete phase Mg Atomic Percent Zinc Zn
separation nature. The fact that there is little reactivity
between the two elements makes it difficult to join them Fig. 2 Mg-Zn binary phase diagram
33
Paper Title (Please Type Using 10-points Times New Roman Font in Bold with First Letter in Capital)
temperature. We focused on this point and tried to use the 4. Results and discussion
low-temperature eutectic reaction of Mg and Zn to remove 4.1 Results of joint interface observations
the oxide film on the magnesium alloy surface. And both Figure. 3 shows SEM images and the AES analysis of
Fe-Al and Al-Mg are combinations that generate the interface of the joint formed with the proposed joining
intermetallic compound (IMC) layers. By using Al, IMC technique, for a combination of the galvanized steel sheet
layers of Fe-Al and Al-Mg can be obtained at the joint and magnesium alloy plate. These observation results
interface. In this way, we devised our concept for dissimilar confirmed that an IMC layer can be formed with this
joining of a magnesium alloy and steel sheet process as a result of removing the oxide layer on the
metallurgically by means of aluminum. Our joining concept magnesium alloy surface in the eutectic melt and
is to achieve such like a joint structure within the short effectively evacuating it toward the periphery of the joint
cycle time of resistance spot welding. area.
Figure. 4 shows TEM images of a joint interface. We
3. Experimental procedure conducted SAED analysis on the regions labeled A and B
The materials used were a zinc coated steel (GI steel) in Fig. 4. The results showed that region A was the Fe2Al5
sheet and a magnesium alloy plate (AZ31). Cross-sectional phase and that region B was the Al12Mg17 phase. The
observations were performed by an auger electron boundaries of regions A and B were not clear, and we
spectroscopy (AES) and a scanning electron microscope presume that the reaction layer was a mixture of these two
(SEM) to verify whether the oxide film on the magnesium phases.
alloy surface was removed and whether the IMC layer was
formed. In addition, transmission electron microscope
(TEM) observation and selected area electron diffraction
(SAED) analysis were performed in order to analyze and
3.0
identify in detail the reaction products produced at the joint N=4 (average value) Ref. JIS Z 3140
interface.
Tensile shear strength (kN)
10μm 1μm
Mg Mg 1200
GI steel-AZ31
Fig. 3 Cross section of joint interface 1000 AZ31-AZ31
Max tensile shear load (N)
800
600
Mg side Mg side
400
A 200
Reaction layer
Reaction layer
B 0 4
200nm 10 105 106 107
500nm
Number of cycles to failure Nf
Fig. 4 TEM microphotographs of joint Fig. 6 Fatigue characteristics
i f
34
Transactions of JWRI, Special Issue on WSE2011 (2011)
35