Professional Documents
Culture Documents
No synchronous generator (nor its prime mover) can run faster or slower than the
other synchronous generators (and their prime movers) on the grid. It's just not
physically possible for one generator to be running at 50.134 Hz and another to be
running at 52.27 Hz, and still another to be running at 49.65 Hz if they are all
connected to the same grid which is operating at 50.001 Hz. It just can't happen.
To make a prime mover (which is providing the torque input that the generator is
converting to amps that is being converted to torque by motors which are also
connected to the grid) stably control its power output while connected in parallel
with other generators and prime movers on a grid, the control systems employ
straight proportional control. And that proportional control is called droop
control, droop speed control.
To increase the power output, the speed reference is increased. But, since the
speed can't actually change the increased error between reference and actual speed
is converted to increased fuel flow. That increased fuel flow, which would tend to
increase the speed, which can't increase appreciably, is still extra torque. And
the generator converts that extra torque into more amps. All of this is done very
smoothly and all the prime movers and their generators behave nicely and work
together to provide the load. If the "load" on the generator is to be increased,
then the turbine speed reference is increase again, the error between the actual
speed and the speed reference increases again, which increases the fuel flow which
increases the torque which increases the amps.
When turbine operators are watching the watt meter and twisting the governor handle
in the Raise direction to get the watt meter reading to increase, they aren't
changing the watt reference they are changing the turbine speed reference.
Droop speed control is straight proportional control in the strictest, purest sense
of the word. There is no reset or integral action to increase the fuel to make the
actual speed be equal to the reference. It can't be equal to the reference (if the
reference is more than the actual speed); it's not physically possible. And droop
speed control makes use of that impossibility to stably control the fuel in
proportion to the error.
When the generator is loaded, power is drawn from the mechanical system and the
generator applies a torque which opposes the direction of motion of the mechanical
system. As a result, the generator tends to slow down the mechanical system. (In
the same way that when you are driving on a flat road and then start to go up a
hill, the car slows down).
If the frequency of the generated voltages is too low, the frequency can be
increased by increasing the no-load speed of the mechanical governor (equivalent to
a cruise control in a car increasing the gas fed to the engine when the car goes up
hill).
All of this happens as long as the load on the Isoch machine doesn't exceed the
ability of the Isoch machine to produce power ("nameplate"), or the load on the
Isoch machine doesn't drop below 0 MW. It's the operator's job to adjust the load
on the Droop machine(s) to keep the load on the Isoch machine above 0 MW (usually
10-20% of rated) and below rated power output (usually 10-20% of rated) so that
sudden changes in load can be absorbed by the Isoch machine without affecting
frequency.
If the total load on a system is 10 MW, and the Isoch machine is rated for 5 MW and
is carrying 4 MW, and two other machines are each rated for 4 MW and are each
carrying 3 MW (for 4 + 3 + 3 = 10), if the operators want to decrease the load on
the Isoch machine by 1 MW they need to increase the load on one or both of the
Droop machines by 1 MW. So, let's say they add 0.5 MW to each of the Droop machines
while the load is stable at 10 MW, the load will be (3 + 3.5 +3.5 = 10 MW).
Isoch load sharing will usually automatically split the load between the units
according to some configuration determined when the system is installed so that the
load will be "shared" by all machines in accordance with their capability. So, in
the above example, two machines are rated for 4 MW each, for a total of 8 MW, and
the third machine is rated for 5 MW, for combined total of 13 MW. The two 4 MW
machines would be set to carry approx. 30.77% of the load, and the 5 MW machine
would be set to carry about 38.46% of the load. So the 5 MW machine would be
carrying approx. 3.846 MW of a 10 MW load, and the two 4 MW machines would each be
carrying about 3.077 MW, for a combined total of 10 MW. Any change in load would be
split according to the above ratios.