GAP ANALYSIS BETWEEN DNVGL-OS-B101 VS EN-10025 (TMCP MATERIAL)

Chemical Analysis is Stringent in DNVGL-B101 than EN 10025-4

Standard Grade C Si Mn P S Cr Mo Ni Cu Al Nb V Ti N
1)
S355ML 0.14 0.50 1.60 0.025 0.02 0.30 0.10 0.50 0.55 0.02 min 0.05 0.10 0.05 0.015
EN 10025-4
S355M 0.030 0.025

DNVGL-OS-B101 D36 0.18 0.50 0.9-1.6 0.035 0.035 0.20 0.08 0.40 0.35 0.02 min 0.02 - 0.05 0.05 - 0.10 0.007 - 0.02 -

CEV is stringent in DNVGL-B101 than EN 10025-4

2)

Mechanical properties including Impact are stringent in DNVGL-B101 than EN 10025-4.

3)

Sample location are different in DNVGL-B101 than EN 10025-4. DNVGL-B101 asks for Impact in Two Direction (Longitudinal & Tranverse).

4)

CE Marking required by EN & Pre-Qualification of Material Manufcturer required by DNVGL-B101.

5)
 NDT operators qualification Stringent in DNVGL-B101 than EN 10025.

6)