Peer Assessment

Student being assessed: Aaron Vissel

Student masking the assessment: Dagmar Besteman

For each aspect, rate the student on a scale from A to D using the following guide:
A: did this very well B: did this adequately
C: did this less than adequate D: did this poorly

General Aspect: Group process

Specific Aspect: Comment: Rating:
Attended a large majority Always present.
A
of group meetings

Maintained contact with Within the group chat he was present.

B
other group members

Communicated constructively Clear arguments, doesn’t drift off by using too B

to discussion many words.

Generally was cooperative in Is willing to think outside the box and accept A
group activities ideas of others. Not fixed on his own plans.

Asked useful questions Could be a bit more topic related sometimes ;) B

Encouraged and assisted other Lets others speak up when they want to, gives A
group members them a chance to talk.

General Aspect: The Task

Made a genuine attempt to Never noticed a hiccup from my point of view.
complete all jobs agreed by A
the group

Made an intellectual Not ground-breaking, but from an academical

contribution to the perspective suffices. B
completion of the task

Did (at least) the fair share Did research on his part and worked it out. B
share of work

Read and commented in Never had any trouble with being on time. A
A timely manner on drafts
of the report

Contributed a significant amount Can speak about his ideas more often, there is B
(measured in ideas as well as more potential.
words) to this report
General Aspect: Overall
Based on your ratings and
comments above, this students
contribution overall
on this group task

Aaron was always present at every meeting, he has always been active, undertaking and
made others aware of his presence during the meetings. He is not someone to blend into the
background easily, so he matches a vibrant group ethic. Aaron is always willing to listen to
others and give them a chance to talk. When he notices someone has trouble speaking up he
gives them a chance, which shows his support towards his other team members.

It would be possible for Aaron to speak his mind bit more concerning topic relevant ideas. I
feel like there could be more creative input from his side, that has not yet been shown. He is
always very talkative, but could try to use this vibrant energy in the making of the product
since we have to give it a unique boost.

Furthermore Aaron is not stubborn, which makes him an easy team mate to work with. He is
willing to make his own actions fit the ideas of others without being a block in the road. All
together he is a very social, energetic person, but has to be careful this won’t be his weak
spot as focus can sometimes drift away.
 Peer Assessment

Student being assessed: Aaron Vissel

Student masking the assessment: Pascal Meier

For each aspect, rate the student on a scale from A to D using the following guide:
A: did this very well B: did this adequately
C: did this less than adequate D: did this poorly

General Aspect: Group process

Specific Aspect: Comment: Rating:
Attended a large majority present at every meeting A
of group meetings

Maintained contact with present in the group chat and always A

other group members contactable

Communicated constructively Gives clear arguments when discussing B

to discussion but sometimes talks to much about non
topic related stuff

Generally was cooperative in listens to all arguments carefully and is A

group activities open for other ideas. No problem with
being wrong

Asked useful questions Has good as well as less good questions B

Encouraged and assisted other Assists when asked to as well as A

group members motivates the group in unproductive
moments

General Aspect: The Task

Made a genuine attempt to Jobs were completed appropriate A
complete all jobs agreed by
the group

Made an intellectual Contributed good information about B

contribution to the interviewing and gave good comments
completion of the task about articles send by his peers

Did (at least) the fair share Completed his task appropriate and on time A
share of work Aaron did his fair share of work

Read and commented in Read the report and gave some critical B
A timely manner on drafts feedback, but it could be more as well
of the report as more detailed

Contributed a significant amount always listening and willing to contribute B

(measured in ideas as well as his fair share of work, but could be more
words) to this report proactive
General Aspect: Overall
Based on your ratings and
comments above, this students
contribution overall
on this group task

Overall Aaron was a productive member of our COP. He contributed many ideas during brainstorm
sessions and was well informed about discussed topics. Aaron dove into the topic of interviewing for
our product and found multiple articles which were informative and helped to create the overall
structure of the topic. He always does his fair share if work and presents the result in an appropriate
and good manner.
On the other hand, Aaron sometimes tends to go of topic which can be irritating at some points.
However, after a complain, Aaron goes back to work and completes his task. In my opinion he needs
to work a little bit on his behaviour to become more professional, on the other hand a laugh during a
working session never harmed nobody and therefore can loose up the tense working environment.

All in all, I am happy with Aaron and his work up to this date and I am sure that this will noot change.