Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Spring 2019-2020
Week number 9 & 10
7.6 Establishing the HACCP plan
7.6.2. Identification of CCPs
No
https://www.inspection.gc.ca/food-safety-for-industry/archived-food-guidance/safe-food-
production-systems/haccp-generic-models-and-guidance-documents/generic-model-
spices/eng/1364478208697/1364478402035?chap=0#s8c4
http://haccpalliance.org/alliance/haccpmodels.html
file:///C:/Users/User/Downloads/HACCP%20Generic%20Model_%20Spices%20%E2%80%93%20Ready-to-Eat%20Fresh-
Cut%20Vegetables%20%E2%80%93%20Forms%20-%20HACCP%20Generic%20Model%20for%20Ready-To-Eat%20Fresh-
Cut%20Vegetables%20-%20Food%20-%20Canadian%20Food%20Inspection%20Agency%20(1).pdf
Identify CCPs in your project
7.6 Establishing the HACCP plan
7.6.3. Determination of critical limits for CCPs
• Critical limits
-Values of monitored actions which separate the acceptable from the unacceptable.
-Are established to determine whether a CCP is under control. If a critical limit is exceeded or
violated, the products affected are deemed to be potentially unsafe.
-Shall be measurable and meet requirements of government regulations and/or company
standards and/or be supported by other scientific data.
-May be set for factors such as temperature, time, water activity, moisture level etc. These
parameters, if maintained within boundaries, will confirm the safety of the product.
• Critical limits based on subjective data (visual inspection) shall be supported by instructions
and/or education and training
Critical Limits (Principle 3)
Set Carefully
Applied to all
CCPs
Correctable Justifiable
Validated
Critical Limits
Criteria most frequently used for Critical
Limits:
• Time
• Temperature
• Aw
• pH
• Preservatives
• Salt concentration
• Viscosity
7.6 Establishing the HACCP plan
7.6.3. Determination of critical limits for CCPs
• If monitoring shows a trend toward lack of control at a CCP, operators can take action
to prevent loss of control of the CCP before the critical limit is exceeded.
-The point at which operators take such action is called “operating limit”.
- Operating limits should not be confused with critical limits
Critical limits_are the safety limits that must be met for each control
measure at a CCP.
One single value which separates safe from unsafe
(Principle 4)
On/Off
line
Tools &
WHERE methods
Related to
the CCP
WHAT HOW
Monitoring
System
Frequency
Responsibilities WHO WHEN
Monitoring System for each CCP
Monitoring procedures:
- Must have a written procedures-real time and accurate
- List frequency-continuous or intermittent
- Done by trained employee – maintain training records
- Monitoring techniques (online/offline)
- Audited and verified
- Monitoring methods must provide rapid results. Most methods are physical
Or chemical measurements:
Example: time, temperature, pH, water activity
7.6 Establishing the HACCP plan
7.6.4. System for the monitoring of CCPs
- To establish records that reflect the performance level of the system’s operation
at the CCP to comply with the HACP plan.
7.6 Establishing the HACCP plan
7.6.4. System for the monitoring of CCPs
• Monitoring is the process that the producer relies upon to show that the
HACCP plan is being followed.
- It provides the producer with accurate records enabling him to show that
the conditions of production are in compliance with the HACCP plan.
• Continuous:
- Time and temperature charts.
- Metals or X-ray detectors
- Bar code scanners for allergen labeling.
• Non-Continuous:
- Product temperature checks.
- pH checks
- Allergen label check
How to monitor?
Observation
Measurement
Why to monitor?
Detect loss of control
Corrective Actions
Quarantine/recall products
Microbiological tests Too slow
Expert interpretation
Further tests
Not efficient
7.6 Establishing the HACCP plan
7.6.4. System for the monitoring of CCPs
• Most monitoring procedure will need to be rapid.
-For this reason, physical and chemical measurements or visual observations,
which may be done rapidly, are often preferred to microbiological testing.
-Examples of some physical and chemical measurements are temperature, time,
pH, moisture level and water activity.
Planned corrective actions to be taken when critical limits are exceeded shall be specified in
the HACCP plan.
The actions shall ensure that the cause of nonconformity is identified, that the parameter (s)
Controlled at the CCP is (are) brought back under control, and the recurrence is prevented.
https://www.inspection.gc.ca/food-safety-for-industry/archived-food-guidance/safe-food-production-systems/haccp-
generic-models-and-guidance-documents/generic-model-dark-chocolate-with-
almonds/eng/1364492141579/1364492481518?chap=2#s15c2
- Product characteristics
- Intended used
- Flow diagrams
- Process steps
- Control measures
7.8 Verification planning
- Careful preparation of the HACCP plan with clear definition of all the
necessary items does not guarantee the plan’s effectiveness
Validation of
Monitoring Verification Improvement
Control
control Of system Of system
measures
Internal Audit
Control Hazard
Valid method and Evaluate Continual
Produce conform
results individual Update
end product
verification result
7.8 Verification planning
Each HACCP plan should include verification procedures for individual CCPs
and for the overall plan.
- HACCP plans are expected to evolve and to improve with experience and
new information.
- Periodic verifications helps improve the plan by exposing and strengthening
weaknesses in the system and eliminating unnecessary or ineffective control
measures.
Validation is the act of assessing whether the HACCP adequately identifies and
Controls all significant food safety hazards or reduces them to an acceptable level.
What is verification?
❖ Based on observations and record review
❖ Usually activities that are repeated routinely
Validation activity examples
Confirming critical limits control the identified significant hazards.
HACCP plan
Verification records
• Document requirements:
❖ Name of record
❖ CCP correlated with it
❖ Document control info (revision date, version, approval)
❖ Space for monitor’s initials/ signature, date ad time of checks
Documentation and record
keeping
➢ Data used to control deviation, shelf-life, hazards,
• Support document for critical limits, product description, intended use, flow
HACCP development diagram, hazard analysis, CCPs, critical limits for each
CCP, verification activities, etc.
• Protect customers
• Document the product history
• Ease the withdrawal and/or recall of products
• Reduce consequences of non-conformities
• Communicate information to stakeholders
• Increase transparency and confidence
7.9 Purpose of Traceability
• Fixed time frame is not set in, but the following recommendation is
given:
- Generally for all products: 5 years from date of manufacturing or delivery
- For products with a shelf life above 5 years: the period of the shelf life +
6 month
- For highly perishable products with “a use by” date less than 3 months
or without a specified date: 6 months after the date of manufacturing or
delivery.
7.10 . Controlling of non-conformity
7.10.1. Corrections
• Corrective actions shall be initiated when critical limits are exceeded or
when there is a lack of conformity with OPRP (s).
• Data derived from the monitoring of OPRPs and CCPs shall be evaluated
by competent person to initiate corrective actions.
7.10 . Controlling of non-conformity
7.10.2. Corrective actions
• Reviewing nonconformities (including customer complaints)
• Reviewing trends in monitoring results that may indicate development
towards loss of control
• Determining the cause (s) of nonconformities
• Evaluating the need for action to ensure that nonconformities do not
recur
• Determining and implementing the actions needed
• Recording the results of corrective actions taken
• Reviewing corrective actions taken to ensure that they are effective
7.10 . Controlling of non-conformity
7.10.3. Handling of potentially unsafe products
• The organization shall handle nonconforming products by taking action
to prevent the nonconforming product from entering the food chain
unless it is possible to ensure that:
- The food safety hazard(s) of concern has(ve) veen reduced to the defined
acceptable levels.
- The food safety hazards (s) of concern will be reduced to identified
acceptable levels prior to entering into the food chain
- The product still meets the defined acceptable level(s) of the food safety
hazard (s) of concern despite the non conformity
7.10 . Controlling of non-conformity
7.10.3. Handling of potentially unsafe products
Each lot of product affected by the nonconformity shall only be released
as safe when:
- Evidence that the control measures have been effective.
- The results of verification activities demonstrate that the affected lot of
product complies with the identified acceptable levels for the food safety
hazard(S) concerned.
7.10 . Controlling of non-conformity
7.10.3. Handling of potentially unsafe products
Following evaluation, if the lot of product is not acceptable for release, it
shall be:
-reprocessed or further processed to ensure that the food safety hazard is
eliminated or reduced to acceptable levels.
- Destroyed and/or disposed as waste
7.10 . Controlling of non-conformity
7.10.4. Withdrawals
• Withdrawn products shall be secured
• Results of withdrawals should be an input to management review
• Withdrawal program shall be verified (mock or practice withdrawals)