1

MANUEL V. GALLEGO FOUNDATION COLLEGES, INC.

Institute of Graduate Studies
Cabanatuan City

LESSON PLAN AND DEMONSTRATION TEACHING SCORING RUBRIC

(Course: Contemporary Teaching Strategies)

Name of Student: (Ratee):_______________________________ Name of Evaluator (Rater):___________________________

Date of Evaluation:_______________________ Time of Evaluation_________________________

DIRECTIONS: Please check the column that is MOST DESCRIPTIVE of the quality of instructional plan and plan
implementation.

A. Outcome-Based, 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.25

Learner-Centered Exceeds Expectations Meets Expectations Approaches Does Not Meet
and Technology- Expectations Expectations
Integrated Lesson (FAILED)
Plan (40%)
CRITERIA:
The outcome specifies The outcome specifies The outcome partly The outcome is
1. Clarity of clearly the action, the clearly the action, the specifies the action, vague; the action,
Outcome output/ performance) and the output / performance) the output/ performance the product
(25%) context that relates directly and the context and the context (performance) and
to the target students’ real the context are
world confusing

2. Alignment of All parts of the plan:
Parts of Plan outcome, objectives,
(25%) output/performance and
learning activities are
perfectly aligned with each
other
All parts of the plan:
outcome, objectives,
output / performance
and learning activities
are aligned with each
other
Parts of the plan: Parts of the plan are
outcome, objectives, not aligned with
output / performance each other
and learning activities
are partly aligned with
each other

3. Scaffolding of Learning activities are
Learning Activities detailed and are
and scaffolded to ensure good
Appropriateness quality learning output /
of Teaching performance, and teaching
Strategies strategies perfectly fit the
(25%) chosen topic
4. Technology The technology (PPT,
Integration video clips/games, etc.)
(15%) that is integrated into the
planned teaching-learning
activities/ strategies is
well-thought out / well-
designed to attain the
desired output /
performance with ease
and fun
5. Language The plan contains no flaws
Accuracy in grammar, spelling,
(10%) terminologies used, etc.
Learning activities are
sufficient and are
scaffolded to ensure
quality output /
performance, and
teaching strategies fit the
chosen topic
The technology (PPT,
video clips/games, etc.)
that is integrated into
the planned teaching-
learning activities /
strategies is well-
thought out / well-
designed to attain the
desired output /
performance
The plan contains minor
flaws in grammar,
spelling, terminologies
used, etc.
Learning activities are Learning activities
limited but are are insufficient and
scaffolded, and are not scaffolded;
teaching strategies teaching strategies
partly fit the chosen do not fit the topic
topic
The technology (PPT, The technology
video clips/games, (PPT, video
etc.) that is integrated clips/games, etc.)
into the planned that is integrated
teaching-learning into the planned
activities / strategies teaching-learning
has little relevance to activities / strategies
the desired output / has no relevance to
performance the desired output /
performance
The plan contains The plan is severely
major flaws in flawed; it is
grammar, spelling, incomprehensible
terminologies used,
etc.

B. PLAN EXECUTION OR TEACHING DEMONSTRATION (60%)

 2

1.00 1.50 2.00 2.25

Exceeds Expectations
CRITERIA:
1. Mastery (25%) Shows spontaneity and
accuracy in processing
information in accordance
with the planned learning
activities, and able to
persuade audience of the
veracity of the information
2. Execution of Planned learning activities
Planned / teaching strategies are
Learning Activities perfectly executed leading
and Teaching to attainment of learning
output / performance with
Strategies (25%) ease
3. Pedagogical The use of technology
Treatment of (PPT, video clips / games,
Technology (25%) etc.) helps illuminate
complex concept/idea and
make learning FUN
Meets Expectations
Shows spontaneity and
accuracy in processing
information in
accordance with the
planned learning
activities
Planned learning
activities / teaching
strategies are
executed as planned
leading to attainment of
learning output/
performance
The use of technology
(PPT, video clips/
games, etc.) helps
illuminate complex
concept/idea
Approaches Does Not Meet
Expectations Expectations
(FAILED)
Lacks spontaneity and Processing of
accuracy in processing information is not
information; there is spontaneous and is
deviation from the inaccurate; there is
planned learning total deviation from
activities the planned
learning activities
Planned learning Planned learning
activities / teaching activities/ teaching
strategies are partly strategies are not
executed leading to followed leading to
partial attainment of non-attainment of
learning output / learning output /
performance performance
The use of technology The use of technology
(PPT/video clips/ (PPT/video clips/
games, etc.) does help
games, etc.) partly illuminate complex
helps in illuminating concept/idea; it leads to
complex concept/idea confusion

4. Communication Speaks spontaneously, Speaks spontaneously Speaks with hesitation; Speaks in an

Skills (15%) clearly, casually and and clearly but with grammar/pronunciation incomprehensible
convincingly without minimal / minor have major flaws manner
grammar and grammar/pronunciation
pronunciation flaws flaws

(Note: 2nd paragraph is Uses pure English
not a requirement for language in his/her
Filipino majors) interactions with students
during the entire teaching
demo duration
6. Attainability Accomplishes the desired
(10%) output / performance on
time (as indicated in the
plan) and with ease
Uses English language
almost entirely in his/her
interactions with
students
Accomplishes the
desired output /
performance on time
(as indicated in the
plan) but with difficulty
Use both English and Uses pure Filipino
Filipino languages in or Tagalog
his / her interactions language in his / her
with students interactions with
students
Accomplishes the Does not
desired output / accomplish the
performance beyond desired output /
the scheduled time performance.
and with difficulty

Remarks/Comments:
________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________________

SUMMARY OF GRADES
GRADES
DESCRIPTIONS
1.0 – 1.25
1.26 – 1.63 Exceeds Expectations
1.64 - 2.00 Meets Expectations
2.01 – 2.25 Approaches Expectations
Does Not Meet Expectations