31

REFERENCES

1. DEFRA (2005)., 'e-Digest of Environmental Statistics' Department for

Environment Food and Rural Affairs.
2. Dunn, J. B., (2015),’ The significance of Li-ion batteries in electric vehicle
life-cycle energy and emissions and recycling’s role in its reduction Energy’,
Environ. Sci. 8 158–68.
3. Dunn, J.B.,( 2012),’ Impact of recycling on cradle-to-gate energy consumption
and greenhouse gas emissions of automotive lithium-ion batteries’, Environ.
Sci. Technol. 46 12704–10.
4. Faria R,Moura P, Delgado J,T. de Almeida A., (2012),‘A sustainability
assessment of electric vehicles as a personal mobility system Energy
Convers’, Manage. 61 19–30.
5. Funazaki A., K. Taneda, K. Tahara and A. Inaba. (2003) 'Automobile life
cycle assessment issues at end-of-life and recycling'. JSAE Review, Volume
24, Issue 4, October 2003, pp381-386
6. Hawkins, T.R.,(2012),‘Comparative environmental life cycle assessment of
conventional and electric vehicles’, J. Indu. Ecol.1753-64
7. Hooftman N, Oliveira L, Messagie M, Coosemans T, Mierlo J Van. 2016.
Environmental Analysis of Petrol , Diesel and Electric Passenger Cars in a
Belgian Urban Setting.
8. ISO 14040 (2006): ‘Environmental management – Life cycle assessment –
Principles and framework, International Organisation for Standardisation’.
9. ISO 14044 (2006): ‘Environmental management – Life cycle assessment –
Requirements and guidelines, International Organisation for Standardisation’.
10. Ma H, Balthasar F, Tait N, Riera-Palou X, Harrison A. 2012. A new
comparison between the life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of battery electric
vehicles and internal combustion vehicles. Energy Policy. 44:160–173.
11. Nordelöf A, Messagie M, Tillman AM, Ljunggren Söderman M, Van Mierlo
J. 2014. Environmental impacts of hybrid, plug-in hybrid, and battery electric
 32

vehicle: what can we learn from life cycle assessment? Int. J. Life Cycle
Assess. 19:1866– 1890.
12. Onat NC, Kucukvar M, Tatari O. 2015. Conventional, hybrid, plug-in hybrid
or electric vehicles? State-based comparative carbon and energy footprint
analysis in the United States. Appl. Energy. 150:36–49
13. Rose L, Hussain M, Ahmed S, Malek K, Costanzo R, Kjeang E. 2013. A
comparative life cycle assessment of diesel and compressed natural gas
powered refuse collection vehicles in a Canadian city. Energy Policy. 52:453–
461.
14. Sims, R., (2014),‘Transport Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate
Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of
the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’, (Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press)pp 1–115.
15. TRL (2003) 'Data required to monitor compliance with the End of Life
Vehicles Directive'. Project Report PR SE/483/02. Transport Research
Laboratory, UK.
16. Wasteonline (2004).,' End of life vehicle and tyre recycling information sheet'
- wasteonline.org.uk
17. Zamel N. and X. Li (2005) ., 'Life cycle analysis of vehicles powered by a fuel
cell and by internal combustion engine for Canada'. Journal of Power Sources.
18. Schweimer G.W. and M. Levin (2000) 'Life Cycle Inventory for the Golf A4.
Research, Environment and Transport', Volkswagen AG, Wolfsburg,
Germany.
19. MEET (1997) Fuel and Energy Production Emission Factors (1997): MEET
Project: 'Methodologies for Estimating Air Pollutant Emissions from
Transport'. Contract No. ST-96-SC.204. Public dissemination - Project funded
by the European Commission under the Transport RTD programme of the 4th
framework programme. 20/6/97 R112.
20. ACCORD (2001)., ' Automotive Consortium on Recycling and Disposal'.
Used Tyre Working Group 2001 Report.