Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Engineering Structures
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/engstruct
a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t
Article history: This paper has evaluated the seismic capacity of some structural models which represent real RC existing
Received 17 March 2012 buildings designed to gravity loads only, through non-linear dynamic simulations. A simulated design of
Revised 18 May 2012 the selected structural models has been performed on the basis of the codes in force and the state of prac-
Accepted 27 June 2012
tice at the time of construction. A total of 216 building classes have been defined by varying building age,
Available online 3 August 2012
number of storeys, the presence and position of infill, plan dimensions, external beam stiffness, and con-
crete strength. Seismic response has been analysed by taking into consideration various peak and integral
Keywords:
intensity measures, and various response parameters, such as ductility demands and inter-storey drift.
Seismic vulnerability assessment
RC buildings
The results confirm that the best intensity measure to be used is the Housner Intensity IH, and that all
Gravity-load design the response parameters have correlation coefficient values statistically significant with IH, but the best
Non-linear dynamic analysis correlation is obtained between IH and drift. Different performances have been discussed with regard to
Masonry infills two main groups of results relevant to building age. Infill distribution and height play the most influential
role in building performance among the parameters adopted to classify the structural types. The analyses
performed in the present paper deal with structural types representative of whole buildings and can thus
be seen as verifying and extending results already available on plane frames.
Ó 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
0141-0296/$ - see front matter Ó 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.06.043
258 A. Masi, M. Vona / Engineering Structures 45 (2012) 257–269
due to ground motion variability; (ii) input motion characteristics and located within a certain region can be determined. In particu-
have a most significant effect on vulnerability curves. On the other lar, specifications on the prescribed values of loads and material
hand, dynamic simulations require input motions having duly se- strengths, as well as the minimum values of the dimensions of
lected characteristics [6]. structural elements and of reinforcement amounts can be derived
A specific procedure based on these premises has already been by reference to the codes in force. However, there are difficulties in
proposed and applied in [9], where structures widely present in the ascertaining: (i) the values of internal forces actually used in the
Italian and European building stock, and representative of low- safety verifications, (ii) the location of reinforcement and, (iii) the
mid- and high-rise building types designed only to vertical loads, detailing solutions. For this reason, reference has to be made to
were considered. The main results reported in [9] highlighted the the structural design handbooks commonly adopted in the period
strong role of the seismic input. Therefore, meticulous consider- (e.g., in Italy, [13]) and to the technical documentation of real
ation is required when ground motions are selected and thus the buildings found in the archives of public administrations, building
choice of artificial accelerograms generated in line with some firms and professional offices. From the handbooks more accurate
codes (e.g. Eurocode 8 [10]) appears inadequate for vulnerability indications can be obtained regarding the design methods and the
assessment evaluations: if compared assuming equal PGA values, arrangement of reinforcement in the structural elements. Techni-
they are too onerous with respect to recorded accelerograms, be- cal documentation of real buildings shows design and construction
cause of their damage potential and frequency content. rules actually adopted in practice, thus enabling verification of the
The studies carried out in [6,9] were relevant to plane frames reliability of the data obtained from codes and handbooks.
extracted from real buildings. Consequently, it is deemed that if On the basis of the knowledge obtained in this manner of the
the whole building is analyzed, the achieved seismic response structural characteristics of existing buildings, it was possible to
can manifest some variation. In fact, real buildings, made of plane implement a procedure for the vulnerability evaluation of RC
frames with different dynamic characteristics, strength and ductile framed structures, representative of typical dwelling buildings
capacity, show a more complicated non-linear dynamic behaviour. [9]. It is made up of five main steps:
The procedure however, inherits further developments as it is able
to provide a realistic evaluation of the seismic vulnerability of RC 1. selection of some structural types of RC buildings, typical of the
existing buildings designed only to vertical loads. For these period and of the region under examination;
reasons, further studies aimed at an improved evaluation of the 2. carrying out of a simulated design of the structural types based
vulnerability of building types by taking into account the interac- on regulatory documents and state of the practice used at the
tions between the different plane types have been performed in time of construction;
recent years, and the main results are presented in this paper. 3. calculation of the seismic response through non-linear dynamic
The main objective of the paper is to identify the influence of analyses;
some structural parameters on the non-linear seismic behaviour 4. evaluation of the performances by means of response vs. inten-
of gravity load designed RC buildings. Specifically, the role of sity relationships relevant to some structural and non-struc-
construction age, dimensions in plan and elevation, presence and tural response parameters (drift, ductility demands, etc.);
position of infill walls and, finally, of concrete strength has been 5. analysis of the increase in degree of damage with increasing
evaluated through non-linear dynamic analyses. Such an evaluation seismic intensities, thus determining the seismic vulnerability
is a necessary preparatory step towards the setting up and of each type through two alternative approaches:
definition of fragility curves of structural types representative of a. assignination of vulnerability classes, according to the Euro-
Italian and European RC building stock. Although studies dealing pean Macroseismic Scale 1998 (EMS-98 [14]);
with the same topic are already present in the technical literature, b. derivation of fragility curves defining the conditional proba-
they were performed either on few sample structures (one max bility of being within or exceeding a certain damage state.
two) accurately modelled and studied (e.g. [11]) or on an extensive
set of structural models achieved from an automatic generation Based on the above results, the seismic vulnerability of individ-
process (e.g. [12]). Moreover, the studies have generally been based ual or groups of buildings can be evaluated by placing them in the
on push-over analyses (such as those performed in the framework different structural types on the basis of their main structural char-
of the RISK-UE Project) and thus their results should be validated acteristics (period of construction, plan dimensions, number of sto-
through more realistic non-linear dynamic simulations. ries, expected material strengths, characteristics of infills, etc.). The
required characteristics can be collected by means of a rapid and
2. Methodology relatively inexpensive field survey, thus making the procedure
suitably applicable in large scale vulnerability evaluations.
Assessing existing RC buildings is a much more difficult task The procedure has already been applied to plane frames by
than designing new ones, because it requires working on struc- assigning the EMS-98 vulnerability classes (step 5.1). An applica-
tures of which only a limited knowledge can usually be obtained. tion of such studies is reported in [15], where the contribution of
There are difficulties in determining current material properties several Italian research centres to the USGS PAGER Project
and possible deterioration conditions carefully, as well as in (http://www.earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/pager/) is given. A
obtaining sufficiently accurate knowledge of some structural data good capacity in estimating mean collapse probabilities of Italian
(e.g. amount and location of reinforcement) as appropriate techni- RC buildings designed only to gravity loads is shown.
cal documentation is rarely available. The present paper focuses on steps 1–4 dealing with structural
A crucial aspect when attempting to gain information about the models representative of whole buildings, thus verifying and
structural characteristics of a building is the period of its construc- extending results already available on plane models. Specifically,
tion. When technical documentation is either not available or the main results of steps 3 and 4 are described indicating the struc-
insufficient, valuable data can be obtained by referring to the struc- tural parameters which have a significant influence on the seismic
tural codes in force, the adopted design methods and the adopted performances of the structures under study. Based on these results,
practices which were common at the time of construction. By using fragility curves for the main structural types representing existing
all the information obtainable from the above sources, a group of RC buildings can be achieved (alternative approach, step 5.2) and
structural characteristics typical of the buildings of a certain period their computation is currently in progress.
A. Masi, M. Vona / Engineering Structures 45 (2012) 257–269 259
2.1. Selection of structural types Besides, an examination of the technical documentation and the
configurations observed in the Italian building stock, has led to the
The most widespread types have been drawn from the survey of definition of three beam types (Fig. 2, on the left) on the basis of
population and building stock carried out over the entire Italian their stiffness: (i) Rigid Beams RB (beams having width b = 30 cm
territory by the National Institute of Statistics (ISTAT census, and depth h = 50 cm), (ii) Flexible Beams FB (wide beams having
http://www.istat.it). Specifically, data collected during the 1991 b = 70 cm and h = 22 cm), and (iii) No Beams NB (in this case a strip
and 2001 ISTAT surveys has been analyzed. Information relevant of the tile lintel floor diaphragm connecting the columns is consid-
to typical existing buildings without seismic design has also been ered). NB are generally present along the internal frames in the
used, by reviewing the original technical documentation or, when transverse direction, while RB and FB can be present in the external
possible, inspecting as-built structures. As a result, the following frames. Combining the different beam configurations with two dif-
aspects which can have a remarkable influence on global seismic ferent plan dimensions (small and large area) four cases have been
behaviour, have been found: considered (Fig. 2, on the right): cases 1 and 3 with RB beams, cases
2 and 4 with FB beams.
the structural system of Italian residential RC buildings is pre- The building types analysed in the present paper correspond
dominantly made up of moment resisting frames; essentially to the ones reported in the Building Typology Matrix
building structures generally have a rectangular plan shape; (BTM) of the Risk-UE Project. With regard to the irregular RC
frames are present in one direction only, generally the longer frames (RC3.2 type in RISK-UE), particular emphasis is devoted to
one (longitudinal), whilst in the orthogonal direction the frames the structural type representative of buildings with pilotis (PF type
are present on the external sides only; in this study).
typically, stiffness distribution is almost symmetric in both
principal directions in plan;
along the external frames unreinforced infill masonry walls are 2.2. Simulated design
present, usually with several large openings along the longitu-
dinal facades. A simulated design of the structural types under study has been
carried out by taking into account gravity loads only. Two con-
This information has been used to define some building types, struction periods have been considered by making reference to
characterized by symmetric plan shape, greater length in the lon- the structural codes for RC buildings in effect in Italy before and
gitudinal direction where frames connected by beams are typically after 1971.
present, and frames without beams in the transversal direction. To- There are two main codes for the design of structures without
tal length is variable depending on length and number of spans. seismic criteria:
The average value of span number is 5, variable in the 3–10 range.
Inter-storey height is generally equal to 3.0 m. Most of the existing 1. the Royal Decree n. 2239 of 1939 (R.D. 1939 [16]), that regu-
buildings have a number of storeys in the range 2–10, leading to a lated the design of RC buildings up to 1971;
total building height variable from 6 m to 30 m. In Fig. 1, the se- 2. the 1971 Law and the consequent issue of Ministerial Decrees
lected building types are shown, where 2-, 4- and 8-storey frames (D.M.), the first one of which was the D.M. 30/5/1972 (D.M.
have been considered, representative of low-, mid- and high-rise 1972 [17]).
buildings, respectively. In the exterior frames, the presence and po-
sition of infill masonry walls have also been considered, thus R.D. 1939 provided extremely poor rules concerning both de-
obtaining the following types: sign and construction activities, particularly with regard to rein-
forcement details. No rules were given for design actions and
frames without effective infills, i.e. with infills having many structural details. The allowable stress method was prescribed in
and/or very large openings or badly connected to the structure the safety verifications. Concrete was classified by means of the
so that their contribution to the strength and stiffness of the average cubic resistance (Rcm) at 28 days of ageing: Rcm had to be
structure can be neglected (BF, Bare Frame); at least three times the resistance value adopted in the calculations
frames with regularly arranged masonry infills (IF, Infilled and contained in the range 120–180 kg/cm2. Steel, generally in
Frame); smooth bars, was characterized by nominal allowable strength val-
frames without masonry infills at the ground floor (PF, Pilotis ues variable in 1400–2000 kg/cm2 range, according to the adopted
Frame). type.
Fig. 1. Number of storeys (on the left) and infill distributions (on the right) of the building types considered in the study.
260 A. Masi, M. Vona / Engineering Structures 45 (2012) 257–269
Fig. 2. Transverse beam types (on the left) and plan dimensions (on the right) of the building types.
D.M. 1972 introduced significant changes with respect to R.D. with the exception of the middle column at the I floor level which
1939. Nominal concrete strength, to be given in terms of character- has 0.30 0.40 m dimensions. All the columns have four reinforce-
istic values (Rck), was variable in the range 150–500 kg/cm2, then ment bars with diameter equal to 16 mm, 14 mm and 12 mm at
far higher than the values prescribed by R.D. 1939. Steel, generally the I, II and III–IV floor level, respectively. Percentage values are
in deformed bars, was characterized by tension strengths variable in the 0.50–0.68% range. Transverse reinforcement is made up of
in the range 4600–5500 kg/cm2 according to the adopted type, that 6 mm hoops with constant spacing equal to 0.15 m. The beams
is A38, A41 or FeB44. For the design of structural elements, the have been designed on the basis of the simplified model of contin-
allowable stress method was prescribed for safety verifications. It uous beam resting on simple supports. They have dimensions
is worth noting that, although the limit states method was intro- 30 50 cm (Rigid Beam) or 70 22 cm (Flexible Beam). Beam
duced in the following years, in design practice the allowable stress reinforcement remains constant along the building height. Shear
method continued to be almost exclusively used. In contrast to R.D. reinforcement is formed by 45° inclined steel bars resulting from
1939, D.M. 1972 provided some rules on structural details, for the reinforcement arranged according to the bending moment dia-
example with regard to the minimum amount and arrangement gram, and adding the hoops (diameter equal to 6 mm) requested
of longitudinal and transversal reinforcement in beams and by either shear values or minimum code requirements. Member
columns. dimensions, reinforcement amount and arrangement in beams
To compensate for the poor prescriptions provided by codes are reported in Fig. 3.
(e.g. about minimum member dimensions and reinforcement Infills are usually made of two layers of hollow brick masonry
detailing), reference has been made in the simulated design pro- (Fig. 4a) with poor mechanical characteristics (Fig. 4b), and a total
cess to the most prominent handbooks and to the current design gross thickness equal to about 30 cm (external panel 12 cm, hollow
practice (typical construction drawings) of both periods. However, space about 10 cm, internal panel 8 cm) for structures built both
also the technical documentation typically provided in design before and after 1971.
practice was rather poor with respect to structural details. As an Generally speaking, Ante71 types can be considered as repre-
example, a simple table reporting section dimensions, number sentative of non-ductile RC framed buildings with poor construc-
and diameter of longitudinal reinforcing bars was generally pres- tion quality (e.g. with low concrete strength and smooth steel
ent for column members. No or poor indications on transverse bars), whereas Post71 buildings can be considered as representa-
reinforcement were usually given. As a consequence, most of the tive of non-ductile RC framed buildings with medium construction
information for the simulated design of the structural elements quality (e.g. with medium concrete strength and deformed steel
has been taken from the commonly used handbooks. bars). Such building types are widely used also in other parts of
Two main classes have been considered according to the period the world, so that studying their performances can be beneficial
of construction of buildings, that is buildings realized before 1971 for other regions and not limited to the Italian community. Partic-
(Ante71, R.D. 1939 was in effect) and after 1971 (Post71, using ularly, RC framed structures with masonry infills are extensively
D.M.1972). However, the simulated design procedure adopted for used in many countries, e.g. they comprises approximately 75%
Ante71 structures is not very different from the one adopted for of the building stock in Turkey, about 60% in Colombia, and over
Post71 ones, the main difference being in material properties. 30% in Greece [18].
Internal force values have been computed on the basis of the
characteristic values of dead and live loads. Live loads were as-
sumed equal to 2.0 kN/m2, as prescribed for residential buildings. 2.3. Selection of seismic input
In designing structural members, safety verifications have been
performed according to the allowable stress method, assuming dif- Seismic input has a fundamental role in the non-linear seismic
ferent mechanical properties of materials for the buildings built response of structures, as widely discussed in the technical litera-
before and after 1971. The values adopted in the study are summa- ture (e.g. [2,6,9,19]). Specifically, in [6] the importance of an accu-
rized in Table 1. rate selection of the accelerograms to be used in vulnerability
The columns have been designed by taking into account axial studies is demonstrated. To achieve realistic estimations of struc-
load only and adopting the minimum requirements provided in tural performances, such a selection needs to be based on intensity
the code and in the handbooks of the reference period. As an exam- measures capable of appropriately representing the damage poten-
ple, in the mid-rise (4-storey) building types designed after 1971, tial of real seismic events. Following this approach, accelerograms
the columns of the external frames always have square sections recorded during real earthquakes prove to be the more appropriate
with 0.30 m dimension. The same occurs in the interior frames, choice when performing vulnerability studies on RC buildings.
A. Masi, M. Vona / Engineering Structures 45 (2012) 257–269 261
Fig. 3. Dimensions, amount and arrangement of reinforcement in: (a) Rigid Beams and (b) Flexible Beams.
Fig. 4. Two-layers masonry infill with hollow brick panels: (a) transverse section of the panel and (b) damage example in L’Aquila earthquake 2009.
A. Masi, M. Vona / Engineering Structures 45 (2012) 257–269 263
Table 2
Adopted values of degrading parameters for Ante71 RC buildings.
Table 3
Fig. 5. PGA–IH relationship for the 50 selected accelerograms. Adopted values of degrading parameters for Post71 RC buildings.
(e.g. elastic spectral ordinate at the fundamental period of vibra- fc = 28 and fc = 18 MPa is small, while the difference is more evi-
tion of the building) parameters in representing the damage poten- dent for fc = 10 MPa, particularly in the 2–4 storey types; such a
tial of a ground motion. Besides, in [38] a relationship to convert IH trend is mainly due the decrease of ductile capacities of RC
into EMS98 intensity has been provided, enabling the use of IH in members, more pronounced when fc decreases from 18 to
large scale loss scenarios (e.g. [39]) prepared by using classical ap- 10 MPa.
proaches like the Damage Probability Matrices [40]. The compari- The lower drift values are always achieved in the IF types, thus
son shows that when the results are displayed with reference to confirming the positive role of masonry infills on the seismic
the Housner Intensity the correlation is higher than using PGA or performance of RC buildings without earthquake resistant
the other selected intensity measures. As an example, in Fig. 8 design, provided that infills are regularly arranged both in plan
the results relevant to BF-Post71-fc18 types (2-, 4- and 8-storey) and elevation. More remarkable differences between IF and
are reported to show the correlation of drift values with both IH both PF and BF types can be seen in 2-storey buildings. As an
and PGA. As can be seen, drift has a far higher correlation with IH example, for IH = 1 m, the percentage difference between drift
than with PGA. Further, in Table 4 the correlation coefficient values values in IF and PF types is on average around 75% in 2-storey
with all the intensity measures, computed according to both Pear- types, and decreases to about 15% in 8-storey types.
son and Spearman, have been reported. Small differences appear Drift values in BF types are always lower than in PF types,
between Pearson and Spearman coefficients, globally confirming although small differences are found, irrespective of concrete
that the best correlation is found considering IH, even though com- strength and building height. As an example, for IH = 1.5 m, per-
parable correlation coefficients are obtained with PGV, too. The centage difference between drift values in BF and PF types is on
lowest correlation values are found considering the effective dura- average around 10% for all building heights.
tion td. For these reasons, in the following the results are always Assuming that for drift values higher than 1.5% the structures
displayed with reference to IH. under study suffer heavy structural damage up to collapse [9],
Results also show that all the response parameters have corre- results show that collapse in BF types can be expected for IH val-
lation coefficient values which are statistically significant with re- ues (computed for drift = 1.5%, the same hereafter) starting
spect to the Housner Intensity, but the best ones are obtained for from 1.15 (4-storey, fc = 10) up to 1.8 (2-storey, fc = 28). IH val-
the correlation between IH and drift. On the other hand, drift is ues slightly lower can be found in PF types, while in IF types
generally considered an effective indicator of global damage on heavy damage up to collapse can be expected for IH values
RC buildings as it correlates well with their structural and non- around 1.4–1.7 in 4- and 8-storey types, and for IH values higher
structural damage [2,41] also observed after severe earthquakes than 2.5 in 2-storey structures.
[19]. As an example, some results in terms of ductility demands
are reported and discussed on the basis of their correlation with Similar trends can be found in Ante71 types with respect to the
drift and IH. Specifically, some relationships are displayed in role of concrete strength, infill distribution and building height
Fig. 9, and the correlation coefficient values of the relationships (Fig. 12). Concerning their performances, the results show that col-
drift–DRCmax and drift–DRBmax are reported in Table 5. As can be lapse in BF types can be expected for IH values starting from 1.05
seen, drift has a high coefficient of correlation with the other dam- (4-storey, fc = 10) up to 1.5 (2-storey, fc = 28). Larger scatter can
age parameters. Therefore, although all the response parameters be found in PF types, where IH values related to expected collapse
listed at Section 2.5 were evaluated, for the sake of brevity results are in the range 0.85–1.6, with the lower values relevant to 4-sto-
are hereafter discussed on the basis of drift values only. rey structures. In IF types heavy damage up to collapse can be ex-
With respect to the role of the parameters adopted to classify pected for IH values around 1.4–1.7 for 4- and 8-storey types, and
structural types, results show that the variability due to plan for IH values higher than 2.5 in 2-storey structures.
dimensions and beam stiffness is rather low compared to other It is interesting to analyse the differences between Ante71 and
parameters (e.g. infill distribution). As an example, the comparison Post71 types comparing the curves in Figs. 11 and 12. Results show
between the results obtained in BF-Post71-4storey type shows that that:
small differences are achieved by comparing cases 1 and 3 (smaller
vs. larger plan area, Fig. 10a). Slightly higher drift values in the in 2- and 4-storey buildings, drift values are generally higher in
types with flexible beams, due to their lower stiffness, can be found Ante71 BF and PF types, with respect to the relevant Post71
by comparing cases 3 and 4 (RB vs. FB, Fig. 10b). Globally, small dif- types. As an example, for IH = 1 m, the percentage difference
ferences are found among cases 1–4 independently by the number between drift values in Ante71 and Post71 types is on average
of storeys and infill distribution (e.g. see IF-Post71-8storey type, around 40–60% in 2-storey structures, and decreases up to
Fig. 10c). Therefore, the role of plan dimensions and beam stiffness about 10–15% in 4-storey structures.
in the variability of structural performance is not explicitly ana- Lower to negligible differences can be found in IF types where
lysed in the following, but mean values of results of cases 1–4 the remarkable contribution of masonry infills, which are iden-
are considered. tical in Ante71 and Post71 types, relegate the differences deriv-
Particularly, different performances among building types are ing from structural member capacity to the background.
discussed by separating the results into two main groups according Low differences can also be found by comparing 8-storey types.
to building age, that is Post71 and Ante71 and, furthermore, by In this case the high values of the fundamental period of vibra-
separating comments on the basis of building height, distribution tion in the structural types of both periods [42] lead to very low
of infill panels, and concrete strength. and rather coincident values of response parameters in Ante71
The diagrams in Figs. 11 and 12 display the best fit curves of the and Post71 types.
results for Post71 and Ante71 types, respectively. In each diagram As for collapse probability, building age causes remarkable dif-
three curves are reported relevant to the three concrete strength ferences in PF types. As an example, in Ante 71 types collapse
values adopted in the analyses. can be expected for IH values decreasing up to 0.85 (4-storey,
With regard to Post71 types (Fig. 11), results show that: fc = 7), while in Post71 types IH values are always higher than
1.1.
Drift values are always higher in the structures with lower con-
crete strength (fc = 10 vs. fc = 28 MPa) with differences decreas- Globally, by comparing the seismic behaviour of the examined
ing with the building height. Generally, the difference between types, a high vulnerability can be expected for the buildings with
A. Masi, M. Vona / Engineering Structures 45 (2012) 257–269 265
Fig. 8. BF-Post71-fc18 types (2-, 4-, 8-storey): drift values as a function of IH (on the left) and PGA (on the right).
Table 4
BF-Post71-fc18 type: correlation coefficient values Drift–IH, Drift–PGA.
Fig. 9. Correlation between drift and maximum Ductility Ratio in Columns (DRCmax) in BF-Post71 types.
Table 5
4. Summary and conclusions
Ante71 and Post71 types: correlation coefficient values Drift–DRCmax, Drift–DRBmax.
An extensive parametric analysis has been performed to evalu-
2 storey 4 storey 8 storey
ate the seismic vulnerability of some RC structural models through
DRCmax DRBmax DRCmax DRBmax DRCmax DRBmax non-linear dynamic simulations. Structural models have been se-
Ante71 lected and detailed in such a way as to be representative of real
BF 0.84 0.76 0.95 0.83 0.84 0.71 existing RC buildings. Coherently with the evolution of the struc-
IF 0.80 0.77 0.94 0.84 0.90 0.83
tural codes in effect in Italy, two construction periods have been
PF 0.77 0.73 0.84 0.73 0.82 0.75
considered, that is Ante71 and Post71 buildings. The same struc-
Post71
tural types (plan dimensions, building height, position and charac-
BF 0.91 0.86 0.95 0.83 0.84 0.72
IF 0.85 0.77 0.94 0.84 0.89 0.80 teristics of infills, etc.) have been considered for both Ante71 and
PF 0.82 0.78 0.84 0.73 0.81 0.77 Post71 buildings. On the contrary, Ante71 and Post71 structures
differ in the properties of constituent materials and, as a conse-
quence, in the structural member dimensions and details (amount
pilotis frames, as confirmed in recent earthquakes (e.g. L’Aquila and arrangement of reinforcement). Ante71 and Post71 types can
2009 [43]). On the contrary, a low vulnerability can be assigned be considered as representative of RC framed buildings with poor
to the buildings with regularly arranged masonry infills. An inter- and medium construction quality, respectively.
mediate behaviour, although closer to PF than IF types, is shown by A total of 216 building classes have been defined by varying
the building types with ineffective infills. some design parameters, that is building age, number of storeys,
266 A. Masi, M. Vona / Engineering Structures 45 (2012) 257–269
Fig. 10. Role of plan dimensions and beam stiffness: (a) smaller (case 1) vs. larger (case 3) plan area in BF-Post71-4storey type, (b) RB (case 3) vs. FB (case 4) beam stiffness in
BF-Post71-4storey type, (c) comparison of cases 1–4 in IF-Post71-8storey type.
Fig. 11. Post71 buildings: results of NLDAs in terms of best-fit curves between IH and drift.
infill presence and position, plan dimensions, external beam stiff- accelerograms applied along the two main horizontal directions
ness, and concrete strength. Each model has been subjected to 50 in plan, thus a total of 21,600 simulations have been performed.
A. Masi, M. Vona / Engineering Structures 45 (2012) 257–269 267
Fig. 12. Ante71 buildings: results of NLDAs in terms of best-fit curves between IH and drift.
Results have been analysed considering various peak (e.g. PGA) and building height. Concerning the differences between Ante71 and
integral (e.g. IH) intensity measures, and various response parame- Post71 types, results show that drift values are generally higher
ters, such as ductility demands and inter-storey drift. in Ante71 structures when considering BF and PF types having 2-
With regard to the considered intensity measures, results con- and 4-storeys, while lower to negligible differences can be found
firm that the best intensity measure to be used is IH. Furthermore, in all IF and 8-storey types. Therefore, Post71 types generally show
results show that all response parameters have correlation coeffi- better performances than Ante71 types, even though differences
cient values statistically significant with IH, but the best one is ob- decrease in the taller structures and, also in regularly infilled types.
tained for the correlation between IH and drift. With regard to the Among the considered structural parameters, infill distribution has
parameters adopted to classify structural types, results show that the greatest influence on seismic response. This confirms results
the variability due to plan dimensions and beam stiffness is rather already found in previous studies on plane frames, related to the
low compared to other parameters (e.g. infill distribution). There- remarkable contribution provided by regularly arranged infills in
fore, different performances in terms of computed drift values have reducing seismic vulnerability of gravity-load designed buildings.
been discussed by considering two main groups of results relevant The analyses performed in the present paper are the extension
to building age, that is Post71 and Ante71, and identifying the role to pseudo-3D structural types of previous studies dealing with sin-
of infill distribution, building height, and concrete strength. gle plane frames. They are the essential premise for setting up fra-
With regard to Post71 types, results show that the lower drift gility curves of existing RC buildings using an HAZUS-like approach
values are always achieved in IF types. Drift values in BF types but representative of the specific building stock under examina-
are always lower than in PF types, even though small differences tion. Fragility curves for the main building types indicated by the
are found irrespective of concrete strength and building height. results of the present study are being set up and will be presented
Furthermore, drift values are always higher in structures with low- in a future paper. The results of the extensive parametric analysis
er concrete strength with differences decreasing with building in conjuction with recent experimental results can also be used
height. Similar results have been found in Ante71 types with to propose a new damage index including both drift and ductility
respect to the role of concrete strength, infill distribution, and demands.
268 A. Masi, M. Vona / Engineering Structures 45 (2012) 257–269
intensity derived from finite faults ground motion simulations. Bull Earthq Eng [42] Masi A, Vona M. Estimation of the period of vibration of existing RC building
2012;10(2):517–45. types based on experimental data and numerical results. In: Increasing seismic
[39] Puglia R, Vona M, Klin P, Ladina C, Masi A, Priolo E, et al. Analysis of site safety by combining engineering technologies and seismological data. Springer
response and building damage distribution due to the 31 October 2002 Book, WB/NATO Publishing Unit; 2008. p. 207–26
earthquake at San Giuliano di Puglia (Italy). Earthquake Spectra, in press. [43] Ricci P, De Luca F, Verderame GM. 6th April 2009 L’Aquila earthquake, Italy:
[40] Dolce M, Masi A, Marino M, Vona M. Earthquake damage scenarios of Potenza reinforced concrete building performance. Bull Earthq Eng
town (Southern Italy) including site effects. Bull Earthq Eng 2003;1(1):115–40. 2011;9(1):285–305.
[41] Priestley MJN, Calvi GM, Kowalsky MJ. Displacement-based seismic design of
structures. Pavia (Italy): IUSS Press; 2007.