Foreign Object Detection: Integration in Food Production - Food Safety... https://www.foodsafetymagazine.com/magazine-archive1/octobernovem...

Home » Magazine Archive » October/November 2012

740

TESTING | October/November 2012

Foreign Object Detection: Integration in Food

Production
By Karl Heinz Wilm
Stones in lentils or beans may damage a tooth. Years ago,
home cooks checked lentils for stones to protect their family
from any harm. The number of occurrences of foreign
materials in food is now becoming less frequent, and
consumers are less used to checking primary foodstuffs for
stones, sharp metal pieces or bones, as the food industry
continuously improves the safety and quality of their
products.

However, this trend also decreases public acceptance for such occurrences to a level that
approaches “zero tolerance.” Any incidence of foreign material harms the consumer,
undermines confidence in the brand and generates headlines. The name of the producer
and the grocery chain that sold the article are widely reported.

Current Regulations around the World

U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Regulations on Adulteration Involving Hard
or Sharp Foreign Objects

A physical hazard in food is any extraneous object or foreign matter that may cause
illness or injury to the consumer.

Consumers do not expect hard or sharp components in foods where kernels are normally
removed, such as cherries or pitted olives. Hard or sharp pit fragments are unexpected
and may cause serious harm if ingested.

FDA considers a product adulterated if it contains a hard or sharp foreign object that
measures 7 mm to 25 mm in length, and is ready-to-eat or requires only minimal
preparation steps that would not eliminate, invalidate or neutralize the hazard prior to
consumption.[1]

1 dari 8 01/11/2019 6:23

Foreign Object Detection: Integration in Food Production - Food Safety... https://www.foodsafetymagazine.com/magazine-archive1/octobernovem...

Foreign objects smaller than 7 mm rarely cause trauma or serious injury except in special
high-risk groups, such as infants, surgery patients and the elderly.[2]

Glass is the most frequently reported foreign material in food to cause illness or injury.

In 1995, the U.S. Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service
concluded that bone particles less than 1 cm are not a safety hazard; particles 1–2 cm are
low risk; and particles greater than 2 cm have the potential to be a safety hazard and may
cause injury.[3]

Foreign material other than bone may pose a potential hazard, and each instance should
be considered on a case-by-case basis, irrespective of size.

FDA Health Hazard Evaluation Board conclusions in cases of foreign materials

(1972–1997) found that 56 percent of objects 1–6 mm in size might pose a limited acute
hazard. For objects greater than 6 mm, only 2.9 percent were judged to present no
hazard.

Section 402(a)(3) of the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act prohibits the distribution of foods
that may contain repulsive matter, considered as filth, such as insects. Most consumers
find the presence of any visible filth contaminant, such as hair in a food product,
nauseating.[4]

Canadian Regulations
Canadian regulations support the FDA concept based on the 7 mm to 25 mm size
criterion.[5] These limits are not followed by Europe in its regulations on the hygiene of
foodstuffs.

2 dari 8 01/11/2019 6:23

Foreign Object Detection: Integration in Food Production - Food Safety... https://www.foodsafetymagazine.com/magazine-archive1/octobernovem...

EU Regulations on Physical Hazards in Foods

All food products sold in the EU must comply with regulations on the hygiene of
foodstuffs, which demand, above all, that these products must be safe.[6] All potential
biological, chemical or physical hazards must be prevented, eliminated or brought down
to an acceptable safety level. To achieve such a level of safety, food processors, packagers
and distributors should use the Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Points (HACCP)
concept, complemented with a quality control system, such as Good Manufacturing
Practices (GMPs) or ISO 9000. European regulations introduced the HACCP concept,
which obliges food producers to install safety measures to avoid physical hazards and
maintain documentation of all events.[7–9]

Hard or sharp foreign objects in foods may cause injury, including lacerations of the
mouth, throat, stomach and intestine. Safety concepts, such as HACCP, are being
introduced globally. They must cover all stages of the production process, from primary
production to retail sales.

Types of Physical Hazards

The type of foreign objects in food affects the technology needed to detect it:

Glass: Sharp glass contamination often occurs during filling processes in glass containers
if a container is accidentally broken. Another source, but less frequent, is light bulbs
broken during building maintenance.

Metal: Sharp metal objects may include screws and equipment splinters, blades, broken
veterinary needles, fragments and clippings of prior processing procedures.

Plastics: Soft and hard plastics may come from packaging material of an intermediary
production phase.

Wood: Wood splinters may have their origin at the farm or may come from handling
wooden pallets.

Stones: Small stones are common in crops like peas or beans contaminated during
harvest.

Classification of Foreign Materials in Food

Every type of food processing has its own specific and potential hazards. Evaluation of
the type of product, the intended market for the product and other factors must be

3 dari 8 01/11/2019 6:23

Foreign Object Detection: Integration in Food Production - Food Safety... https://www.foodsafetymagazine.com/magazine-archive1/octobernovem...

considered to determine the risk category of a possible physical hazard.

The Canadian Food Inspection Agency rates the likelihood of occurrence of physical
hazards based on the level of control a food processor can exercise to eliminate the
risk:[5, 10]

Low risk: If good control measures have been established, but minor infractions occur.

Medium risk: If some control measures were established, but inconsistencies occur.

High risk: If little or no control was established, major and critical infractions occur.

Foreign material may occur naturally in raw materials and food ingredients, such as
stones in lentils or bones in fish or meat.

It may be added unintentionally during processing due to poor equipment, as a result of

maintenance work or construction in the vicinity of an operating production line.
However, it may also be deliberately added to the food during processing or at grocery
retail as an act of blackmail, revenge or mental disorder.

Controlling Physical Hazards

It is necessary to implement GMPs, ISO 9000 and ingredient specifications, such as
determining that containers are weld-sealed to exclude staples and plastic or twist ties. A
vendor’s certification for raw materials must include physical hazard controls. The use of
foreign material screening equipment and employee training throughout the whole
processing chain is strongly recommended.

An effective physical hazard identification program requires detailed information for

every step of the food processing line. To obtain such information, the production
processes must be closely observed during all phases of their operation. Procedures to
control physical hazards can be determined with such observations, and a Control Point
can be included in the HACCP plan.

It is strongly recommended to be more stringent than the required 7 mm to 25 mm rule

of FDA. A customer will be outraged if he finds a 30-mm plastic piece in a jar of pasta
sauce or 5-mm hard starch lumps in baby food. Fruit stones, flavor lumps, bone chips,
metal fragments, broken injection needles, shotgun pellets, pieces of packaging, stones,
glass, pit fragments, insects or other filth materials are serious problems. Such foreign

4 dari 8 01/11/2019 6:23

Foreign Object Detection: Integration in Food Production - Food Safety... https://www.foodsafetymagazine.com/magazine-archive1/octobernovem...

materials represent badly maintained facilities and equipment, improper production

procedures and poorly conducted employee training. Any and all are a potentially lethal
blow to consumer trust.

Points of Origin and HACCP Corrective Steps

Control methods include raw material inspection and specification, vendor certification
and letters of guarantees, metal detectors, X-ray technology, effective pest control at the
facility, preventive equipment maintenance and proper sanitation procedures. Also
important are proper shipping, receiving and storage practices as well as tamper-proof or
tamper-evident packaging.

The food categories, in decreasing order of complaint frequency, are pastries, soft drinks,
vegetables, infant foods, fruits, cereals, fish, chocolate and cocoa products.[11]

Of 10,564 cases of foreign object injuries in children included in the Susy Safe Project
Registry, 26 percent were due to a food item, resulting in complications and prolonged
hospitalization. Bones were the most commonly retrieved food foreign object, while nuts
were most frequently associated with complications. The critical group ranging from 2 to
3 years of age requires special food surveillance.[12]

Specific characteristics of foreign bodies associated with increased hazard, such as size,
shape, hardness, pliability and elasticity, must be better defined to identify risky foods
for children up to 4 years of age. Nuts and seeds are one of the most common food items
leading to injuries in children. Control of the hazard level of various foods should be
improved, and warning labels on high-risk foods are suggested.[13]

Medical reports on life-threatening incidents of physical hazards in food are plentiful.

Several medical reports underline the severity of swallowing food containing sharp
objects. Although most pass harmlessly through the gastrointestinal tract and
conservative management is generally recommended, 10 to 20 percent require
nonoperative interventions and approximately 1 percent require surgery. An estimated
1,500 deaths occur annually from foreign object ingestion in the U.S.[14]

Most upper gastrointestinal foreign objects are related to food ingestion, and meat
products are most often found to be the origin of such events.[15]

The removal of sharp foreign objects from the esophagus can be dangerous and
challenging. Hyun et al.[16] describe proper apparatus and appropriate techniques that

5 dari 8 01/11/2019 6:23

Foreign Object Detection: Integration in Food Production - Food Safety... https://www.foodsafetymagazine.com/magazine-archive1/octobernovem...

should be employed to avoid life-threatening complications. These authors present a

procedure for recovering fish bones from the esophagus.

The types of foreign-object swallowing incidences in children include coins (57%), button
batteries (22%), sharp objects (12%), chicken bones (2.3%) and others (6.7%).[17]

Preventing Common Physical Hazards

Care taken to protect the consumer covers bulk food production, portioned packaged
foods at grocery stores and fast food. The complete production chain must identify small
particles of metal, glass, wood, plastic fragments, stones and other foreign objects, such
as moths and beetles, that hurt the consumer or cause a nauseating reaction. Controls
should include the following:
• Inspection of raw materials and ingredients, looking for field contaminants

• Provision of good storage facilities, usage of lamp covers to avoid bulb breakage and
maintenance of effective pest control

• Development of specifications and controls for all ingredients and components

• Effective detection and elimination systems for physical hazards, such as metal
detectors or magnets to remove metal particles; use of X-ray and low-power microwave
systems to detect nonmetallic materials

• Periodic training of employees engaged with shipping, receiving, storing, handling and
equipment maintenance that encompasses the entire food production chain, including:

Agricultural Production
These include grains, vegetables, big farms and small organic businesses.

Meat Production
Care should be taken at farms, abattoirs and retail; knives, mincers, meat slicers, vacuum
bowl cutters and broken injection needles must be scanned.

Transportation
Special care is needed for bulk transportation; recovery after road accidents should be
observed.

Food Processing Factory

6 dari 8 01/11/2019 6:23

Foreign Object Detection: Integration in Food Production - Food Safety... https://www.foodsafetymagazine.com/magazine-archive1/octobernovem...

The daily maintenance of transport belts must be assured (Figure 1). Well-sanitized
machines that look very good may bear many hazards of foreign bodies in food, like
broken parts of defective systems. Audits should concentrate on these problems and daily
inspections of peeling machines and vegetable slicers.

Grocery Chains
Personnel should be trained to be attentive to prevent packaging adulteration or criminal
attempts of extortion.

Hospitality
Restaurants, hotels and fast food chains should consider introducing GMPs and HACCP.

Technology for Detection of Foreign Particles

Every product presents special technological challenges. Translucent and opaque liquids
filled in bottles, colored opaque plastic packages, tin cans or milk cartons respond
differently to available detection systems (Figure 2).

Metal detectors: Metal detectors find splinters from machinery, fractions of broken
cutters and blades, needles, screws or fragments of clips.

X-ray detectors: These respond to metal, stone, bone, hard plastics and Teflon. Both
systems can screen the product after the filling procedure. X-ray detectors may find glass
pieces that result when a jar or bottle is crushed during malfunction of the packaging
line.

Near-field radar response: Foreign bodies are detected in embedding material by

transmitting low-power microwaves through the material, as explained by the Swedish
Institute for Food and Biotechnology and the Food Radar System (FRS).[18] The system
uses a microwave sensor designed for emulsions and pumpable products. It measures the
dielectric properties of the food flow of processing equipment. Foreign materials produce
a deviation from the norm, activating a pneumatic rejection unit. The system not only
detects denser foreign objects but also is particularly suited to foreign objects such as
wood, plastic, bone, extraneous vegetable matter, contaminants such as fruit stones and
nut kernels and process faults such as flavor and starch lumps in baby foods.

FRS must be installed within the pipe system, before packaging. Any deviation at the
filling station is not covered.

7 dari 8 01/11/2019 6:23

Foreign Object Detection: Integration in Food Production - Food Safety... https://www.foodsafetymagazine.com/magazine-archive1/octobernovem...

Conclusions
Ample technology exists for detection of foreign material in foodstuffs. To ensure food
safety, this technology should be complemented by quality control practices such as
HACCP and GMPs, and by ongoing training of personnel. With proper implementation
in the production line, illness or injury to consumers can be avoided.

Karl Heinz Wilm is a biochemist at the University Belém do Pará, Brazil. He has 32
years of quality management experience in the German food industry.

References
1. www.fda.gov/ICECI/ComplianceManuals/CompliancePolicyGuidanceManual
/ucm074554.htm.
2. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10049789.
3. www.fsis.usda.gov/OPPDE/rdad/FRPubs/02-033N
/ThePhysicalHazardsofForeignMaterials.pdf.
4. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11029271.
5. www.gov.mb.ca/agriculture/foodsafety/processor/cfs02s33.html.
6. www.cbi.eu/?pag=85&doc=1109&typ=mid_document.
7. eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ
/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2004:139:0001:0054:EN:PDF.
8. eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ
/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2004:226:0083:0127:EN:PDF.
9. eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ
/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2004:139:0206:0320:EN:PDF.
10. laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/regulations/C.R.C.,_c._870/index.html.
11. foodsafety.unl.edu/haccp/start/physical.html.
12. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22376998.
13. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22365133.
14. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3123183/?tool=pubmed.
15. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17131048.
16. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22318080.
17. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17766213.
18. www.foodradar.com/assets/pdf/fruit_processing_0112.pdf.

> Categories: Contamination Control: Physical; Testing and Analysis: Physical

740

8 dari 8 01/11/2019 6:23