Nu Star Cebu Structural Calcs Typical Floor 1sub 12may2020

STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS
OF TYPICAL FLOOR CURTAIN WALL SYSTEM
NU STAR CEBU
(TOWER 1)
Cebu Southroad Properties, Cebu City, Philippines
May 12, 2020
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Sheet No. 1
I. DESIGN CRITERIA
II. RWDI WIND TUNNEL TEST REPORT (TOWER 1)
III. ANALYSIS OF GLASS

A1. Analysis of 1.5mW X 2.4mH Outer Vision Glass................... III.A1 Glass 1/3 - 3/3
A2. Analysis of 1.5mW X 2.4mH Inner Vision Glass Lite............. III.A2 Glass 1/4 - 4/4
B1. Analysis of 1.5mW X 1.3mH Spandrel Glass......................... III.B1 Glass 1/4 - 4/4
C1. Analysis of 1.533mW X 2.4mH Outer Vision Glass............... III.C1 Glass 1/3 - 3/3
C2. Analysis of 1.533mW X 2.4mH Inner Vision Glass Lite......... III.C2 Glass 1/4 - 4/4
D1. Analysis of Sealant Bite @ Hotspot Condition.................... III.C1 Sealant 1/3 - 3/3
D2. Analysis of Sealant Bite @ Non-Hotspot Condition........... III.C2 Sealant 1/3 - 3/3
IV. ANALYSIS OF MULLION

A1. Analysis of Typical Height Int. Mullion@ Hotspot................ IV.A1 Mullion 1/15 - 15/15
A2. Analysis of Typical Height Int. Mullion@ Non-Hotspot....... IV.A2 Mullion 1/15 - 15/15
V. ANALYSIS OF TRANSOM
A. Analysis of Intermediate Transom @ Hotspot..................... V.A Transom 1/7 - 7/7
B. Analysis of Stackjoint Transom @ Hotspot........................... V.B Stack Joint 1/14 - 14/14
C. Analysis of Stackjoint Element @ Hotspot............................V.C Stack Head 1/4 - 4/4
VI. ANALYSIS OF TRANSOM AND MULLION CONNECTION

A. Analysis of Screw Connection at Int. Transom................... VI.A Screw 1/5 - 5/5
B. Analysis of Screw Connection at Sill Stack Joint................ VI.B Screw 1/5 - 5/5
C. Analysis of Screw Conn. at Head Stack Joint.................... VI.C Screw 1/5 - 5/5
VII. ANALYSIS OF BRACKETS, BOLTS AND ANCHOR

A. Load Reaction at Support….................................................. VII.A Reaction 1/4 - 4/4
B1. Analysis of Hook Bracket @ Hotspot Condition…............. VII.B1 Hook Bracket 1/5 - 5/5
B2. Analysis of Hook Bracket @ Non-Hotspot............................VII.B2 Hook Bracket 1/5 - 5/5
C1. Analysis of Primary Bracket @ Hotspot Condition…......... VII.C1 Primary Bracket 1/4 - 4/4
C2. Analysis of Primary Bracket @ Non-Hotspot…....................VII.C2 Primary Bracket 1/4 - 4/4
D1. Analysis of Bolts and Screw @ Hotspot…............................. VII.D1 Bolts and Screw 1/3 - 3/3
D2. Analysis of Bolts and Screw @ Non-Hotspot…....................VII.D2 Bolts and Screw 1/3 - 3/3
E1. Analysis of Anchor Bolt (@ -6.75kPa Hotspot)…................. VII.E1 Anchor Bolt 1/6 - 6/6
E2. Analysis of Anchor Bolt (@ -4.25kPa Non-Hotspot)…........ VII.E2 Anchor Bolt 1/6 - 6/6
NU STAR CEBU
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Sheet No. 2
VIII. ANALYSIS OF OPERABLE WINDOW AND COMPONENTS

A. Analysis of Sash Frame(@ -6.75kPa Hotspot).............................. VIII.A Sash Frame 1/8 - 8/8
B. Analysis of Hinge Connections...................................................... VIII.B Hinge 1/8 - 8/8
C. Analysis of Lock Points..................................................................... VIII.C Lock Points 1/1
IX. APPENDICES
A. ENGINEERING DATA
ADM: Table 3.3-1
ADM: Table 2-22
ADM: Table 2-24
ASTM E 1300: Table 1 to Table 4
ASTM E 1300: Table 5 to Table 6
ASTM E 1300: APPENDIXES, X2
AAM TIR A9-91: Table 11
B. STAAD INPUT
STAAD Input for Mullion Analysis….......................................................... Page 1/1
STAAD Input for Operable Frame Analysis…....................................... Page 1/1
NU STAR CEBU
I. DESIGN CRITERIA
NU STAR CEBU

DESIGN CRITERIA
1.0 REFERENCES
1.1 National Structural Code of the Philippines 2015, 6th Edition

Volume 1, Buildings, Towers, and other Vertical Structures
1.2 Standard Practice for Determining Load Resistance
of Glass in Buildings - ASTM E1300 2000 Edition
1.3 Aluminum Design Manual
Specifications and Guidelines for Aluminum Structures
1.4 RWDI WIND TUNNEL TEST REPORT
2.0 DESIGN LOADS
2.1 DEAD LOADS

3
2.1.1 Glass unit weight -----------------------------25.10kN/m
2.2 LIVE LOAD

2.2.1 Impact Live Load ----------------------------890N
2.3 WIND
2.3.1 RWDI WIND TUNNEL TEST REPORT
2.4 Other loadings shall be in accordance with NSCP/ASTM

Requirements and specifications.
3.0 MATERIAL SPECIFICATIONS
3.1 ALUMINUM - 6063-T6 or 6061-T6 for Extrusions

- 3003-H14 for Painted or Mill Sheet
3.2 STEEL - ASTM A36 for Hot-Rolled Shapes

& Plates
- ASTM A500 Gr. B for Steel Tubing
- ASTM A569 for Sheet
NU STAR CEBU
3.3 ANCHOR BOLT - Grade 8.8 Carbon Steel
- Electro-Galvanized
3.4 EXTERIOR FASTENERS - Stainless Steel, A316
3.5 INTERIOR FASTENERS - QQP 416, Type I, Class 1 CAD-

Plated Steel in Dry Area
- 300 Series Stainless Steel in
Wet Area
3.6 WELDS - E70xx Electrode for Steel

- ER 4043 Electrode for Aluminum
NU STAR CEBU
II. RWDI WIND TUNNEL TEST REPORT (TOWER 1)
NU STAR CEBU

Note:
1 The wind loads presented are the ASCE 7-10 ultimate state wind loads
multiplied by 0.6 for Allowable Stress Design and are to be applied to the
building's cladding system in the same manner as would wind loads
calculated by code analytical methods. For Load and Resistance Factor Design
T1 applications, the wind loading presented needs to be divided by 0.6.
A1
Key Plan Key Plan of Wall Surface (A)
3.25
SURFACE A1
2.75
PP T.APX.
LVL 27
3.25
LVL 26
4.25
LVL 25
LVL 24
LVL 23
LVL 22
LVL 21
LVL 20
LVL 19
SEE TOWER 1 - ELEVATION 2
LVL 18 4.25
LVL 17
LVL 16
LVL 15
LVL 14
LVL 13
LVL 12
LVL 11
LVL 10
LVL 9
LVL 8 5.25
LVL 7
3.75
LVL 6
LVL 5
7.25 4.25
8.25 7.25
3.25
SEE PODIUM ELEVATION

4.75
TOWER 1 - ELEVATION 1
0 10 25m
Recommended Wind Loads for Cladding Design (kPa) Drawn by: SSU Figure: 4
Peak Net Negative Pressures
(Negative External Pressure with Positive Internal Pressure Where Applicable) Approx. Scale: 1:600
300-Year Design Wind Speed = 267 km/h, Importance Factor = 1.0
Cebu Integrated Resort - Cebu, Philippines Project #1900907 Date Revised: Aug. 13, 2019
Note:
The wind loads presented are the ASCE 7-10 ultimate state wind
loads multiplied by 0.6 for Allowable Stress Design and are to be
applied to the building's cladding system in the same manner as
would wind loads calculated by code analytical methods. For Load
2 and Resistance Factor Design applications, the wind loading
presented needs to be divided by 0.6. B1
T1
Key Plan of Wall Surface (B)

Key Plan
3.25
3.75
3.25
SURFACE B1
3.25
PP T.APX. 4.25 3.75 3.25
LVL 27 3.25
3.75
LVL 26
LVL 25
2.75
LVL 24
LVL 23
3.75
LVL 22
LVL 21
LVL 20
2.75
LVL 19
4.25
LVL 18
LVL 17
LVL 16
LVL 15
LVL 14
LVL 13
LVL 12
3.25
LVL 11
LVL 10
LVL 9
LVL 8 2.75
3.75
LVL 7
LVL 6
LVL 5
0 10 25m
Note:
The wind loads presented are the ASCE 7-10 ultimate state wind loads multiplied by C3
0.6 for Allowable Stress Design and are to be applied to the building's cladding C1
system in the same manner as would wind loads calculated by code analytical
methods. For Load and Resistance Factor Design applications, the wind loading
T1
presented needs to be divided by 0.6. C2
C
Key Plan
Key Plan of Wall Surfaces (C)
3.25 3.25
SURFACE C1
SURFACE C2
PP T.APX.
4.25
3.25 LVL 27
LVL 26
5.25 LVL 25
4.25
LVL 24
LVL 23
LVL 22
4.75
3.75
LVL 21
4.75
LVL 20
LVL 19
LVL 18
LVL 17
3.25 LVL 16
SEE TOWER 1 - ELEVATION 2 3.75 LVL 15

4.25
LVL 14
LVL 13
LVL 12
5.25 LVL 11
4.75
LVL 10
LVL 9
LVL 8
3.75 LVL 7
LVL 6
LVL 5
SURFACE C3
TOWER 1 - SECTION C-C
0 10 25m
Note:
and Resistance Factor Design applications, the wind loading D1
T1 presented needs to be divided by 0.6.
4
D2 D3
D4
Key Plan of Wall Surfaces (D)

Key Plan
3.75
2.75
3.25 3.25
SURFACE D4
SURFACE D1 3.25
SURFACE D3
SURFACE D2
4.25
3.75 4.25
PP T.APX.
3.25 6.75 4.25 3.25
LVL 27 3.25 4.75
LVL 26 4.25
3.75
3.25
LVL 25
LVL 24 5.25
4.25 5.75 4.25
LVL 23
LVL 22
LVL 21
4.75
LVL 20
LVL 19 3.75
LVL 18 3.25 3.75
LVL 17
6.25
LVL 16
3.25
LVL 15
LVL 14 4.25
LVL 13
5.75
LVL 12
6.75
LVL 11
5.25
LVL 10
LVL 9
LVL 8 4.25
6.25 4.25
3.75
LVL 7
LVL 6
4.75
5.75
LVL 5
4.25
0 10 25m
Note:
1 The wind loads presented are the ASCE 7-10 ultimate state wind loads
multiplied by 0.6 for Allowable Stress Design and are to be applied to the
building's cladding system in the same manner as would wind loads
calculated by code analytical methods. For Load and Resistance Factor Design
T1 applications, the wind loading presented needs to be divided by 0.6.
A1
Key Plan Key Plan of Wall Surface (A)
2.75
SURFACE A1
3.25
PP T.APX.
LVL 27
LVL 26
2.75
LVL 25
LVL 24
LVL 23
LVL 22
LVL 21
LVL 20
LVL 19
2.75
LVL 18
LVL 17
LVL 16
LVL 15
LVL 14
LVL 13
LVL 12
LVL 11
LVL 10
LVL 9
LVL 8 3.25
2.75
LVL 7
LVL 6
LVL 5
2.75
0 10 25m
Peak Net Positive Pressures
(Positive External Pressure with Negative Internal Pressure Where Applicable) Approx. Scale: 1:600
Note:
2 and Resistance Factor Design applications, the wind loading
presented needs to be divided by 0.6. B1
T1
Key Plan of Wall Surface (B)

Key Plan
2.75
SURFACE B1
PP T.APX.
LVL 27
LVL 26 2.75
LVL 25
LVL 24
LVL 23
LVL 22
LVL 21
LVL 20
LVL 19
LVL 18 2.75
LVL 17
LVL 16
LVL 15
LVL 14
LVL 13
LVL 12
LVL 11
LVL 10
LVL 9
LVL 8 2.75
LVL 7
LVL 6
LVL 5
0 10 25m
Note:
The wind loads presented are the ASCE 7-10 ultimate state wind loads multiplied by C3
0.6 for Allowable Stress Design and are to be applied to the building's cladding C1
system in the same manner as would wind loads calculated by code analytical
methods. For Load and Resistance Factor Design applications, the wind loading
T1
presented needs to be divided by 0.6. C2
C
Key Plan
Key Plan of Wall Surfaces (C)
2.75
SURFACE C1
2.75
SURFACE C2
2.75 PP T.APX.
3.25 LVL 27
LVL 26
LVL 25
2.75 3.25 LVL 24
LVL 23
LVL 22
LVL 21
LVL 20
LVL 19
LVL 18
LVL 17
LVL 16
3.25
LVL 15
LVL 14
LVL 13
LVL 12
LVL 11
LVL 10
LVL 9
2.75 3.25 LVL 8
LVL 7
LVL 6
LVL 5
SURFACE C3
TOWER 1 - SECTION C-C
0 10 25m
III. ANALYSIS OF GLASS
NU STAR CEBU

Project Name: NU STAR CEBU
Location: Cebu Southroad Properties, Cebu City, Philippines
Item: Analysis of 1.5mW X 2.4mH Outer Vision Glass (8mmHS + 12mmAS + 8mmFT) considering -6.75kPa
Date: May 11, 2020
• FIG.1.1 : Partial Elevation of Curtain Wall System (Refer to Drawing No. APP-PE01)
GLASS
BEING
I. DESIGN PARAMETERS:
Neg. Design Wind Pressure, -q = 6.75 kPa

Glass Type = IGU
Long Dimension, a = 2400.00 mm
Short Dimension, b = 1500.00 mm
Glass Treatment :
Glass Lite 1 = Heat Strengthened
Glass Lite 2 = Fully Tempered
Thickness of Glass, tg
Glass Lite 1, t1 = 8.00 mm
Area of Glass, A = axb
2
= 3600000.00 mm
Modulus of Elasticity, E = 71700000.00 kPa
3
Unit Weight of Glass, Ug = 24525.00 N/m
III.A1 Glass 1/3
Date: May 11, 2020
II. CHECK GLASS ALLOWABLE PRESSURE LOAD:
2.1 Determine Glass Factor

Refer to ASTM E-1300 TABLE 2 Glass Type Factors ( GTF ) for Insulating Glass (IG).
Glass Lite 1, GTF1 = 1.90

2.2 Determine Load Share Factor :

Refer to ASTM E-1300 TABLE 5 Load Share Factors ( LS ) for Insulating Glass Units.
Glass Lite 1, LS1 = 2.00

2.3 Determine Non-Factored Load

For Both Glass Lite 1 & 2 refer to Figure 2.1 ( ASTM E-1300 FIG.A1.6 )
Glass Lite 1, NFL1 = 1.90 kPa

• FIG.2.1 : ASTM E1300-04 FIG.A1.7 : Non Factored Load Chart (upper chart) for
8mm Glass with Four Sides Simply Supported.
1.9
2.4 Determine Load Resistance
Glass Lite 1, LR1 = 7.22 kPa

Since LR1 < LR2 wps = 7.22 kPa
2.5 Determine Glass Allowable Pressure Load, wps
wps = 7.22 kPa
Since wps > -q Therefore, glass is SAFE on Pressure Load.
III.A1 Glass 2/3
Date: May 11, 2020
III. CHECK DEFLECTION OF GLASS:
3.1 Allowable Deflection
■ At Full Design Wind Load:
Allowable Deflection, δallow = 35.00 mm
■ At Half Design Wind Load:
Allowable Deflection, δallow/2 = b

90
= 16.67 or 19.00 mm
3.2 Load Carried By Each Lite, -q/LS :
Glass Lite 1,q1 = -q/LS1 = 3.38 kPa

Glass Lite 2, q2 = -q/LS2 = 3.38 kPa
3.3 Determine Maximum Glass Deflection:

Refer to ASTM E-1300 Section X2.1.Alternate Procedure For Calculating The Approximate Center Of Glass Deflection.
■ At Full Design Load:
2 3
ASTM X2.2 r0 = 0.553 – 3.83 ( a/b) +1.11 ( a/b ) – 0.0969 (a/b )
= -3.15
2 3
ASTM X2.3 r1 = - 2.29 + 5.83 ( a/b ) - 2. 17 ( a/b ) + 0.2067 (a/b )
= 2.33
2 3
ASTM X2.4 r2 = 1.485 – 1.908 ( a/b) +0.815 ( a/b ) – 0.0822 (a/b )
= 0.18
2 4
ASTM X2.5 x = ln{ln [ q (ab) / E t ]}
= 1.61
ASTM X2.1 δmax = t1 exp ( ro + r1 x + r2 x2 )
= 23.37 mm
Since δmax < δallow Therefore, glass is SAFE on deflection at full design load.
2 3
ASTM X2.2 r0 = 0.553 – 3.83 (a/b) + 1.11 (a/b) – 0.0969 (a/b)
= -3.15
2 3
ASTM X2.3 r1 = - 2.29 + 5.83 (a/b) - 2. 17 (a/b) + 0.2067 (a/b)
= 2.33
2 3
ASTM X2.4 r2 = 1.485 – 1.908 (a/b) + 0.815 (a/b) – 0.0822 (a/b)
= 0.18
ASTM X2.5 x = ln{ln [ q1 (ab) 2 / E t 4]}
= 1.46
ASTM X2.1 δmax/2 = t1 exp (ro + r1 x + r2 x2)
= 15.19 mm
Since δmax/2 < δallow/2 Therefore, glass is SAFE on deflection at half design load.
III.A1 Glass 3/3
Item: Analysis of 1.5mW X 2.4mH Inner Vision Glass Lite (8mmHS + 12mmAS + 8mmFT)
Date: May 11, 2020
GLASS
BEING
NOTE: The inner glass lite was analyzed using STAAD Software Analysis considering the application of 890N impact load.
The load share wind pressure of -3.38kPa will be considered in the analysis of inner glass lite. Please see Page III.A1 Glass 3/3.
Neg. Design Wind Pressure, -q = 3.38 kPa Refer to Page III.A1 Glass 3/3.
Impact Live Load, LL = 890.00 N
Glass Type = IGU
Glass Treatment :
2
= 3600000.00 mm
3
III.A2 Glass 1/4
Date: May 11, 2020
Figure 1.1 STAAD Model and Application of Impact Live Load
Allowable Surface Stress of FT, σallow = 73.00 MPa

Please refer to VIII. APPENDICES (A. Engineering Data)
Actual Surface Stress, σact. = 56.046 MPa

Refer to Table 2.1 or Fig. 2.1 Stress Result, Plate 8882
σallow > σact. SAFE
σact.
Stress Ratio = = 0.77 < 1.00
σallow
Table 2.1 STAAD Stress Result
III.A2 Glass 2/4
Date: May 11, 2020
Figure 2.1 Stress Contour

90
= 16.67 or 19.00 mm
3.2 Actual Deflection
■ Actual Deflection @ Full Design, δactual = 12.805 mm

Refer to Table 3.1 Node Displacement Summary for Full Design, Node 2320
■ Actual Deflection @ Half Design, δactual/2 = 6.403 mm

III.A2 Glass 3/4
Date: May 11, 2020
Table 3.1 Node Displacement Summary for Full Design
Table 3.2 Node Displacement Summary for Half Design
III.A2 Glass 4/4
Item: Analysis of 1.5mW X 1.3mH Spandrel Glass (8mmHS + 12mmAS + 8mmHS) @ -6.75kPa Hotspot
Date: May 11, 2020
GLASS
BEING
ANALYZED

Glass Type = IGU
Glass Treatment :
2
= 1950000.00 mm
3
III.B1 Glass 1/4
Date: May 11, 2020






3.1

Since LR1 > LR2 wps = 11.16 kPa
wps = 11.16 kPa
III.B1 Glass 2/4
Date: May 11, 2020

90
= 14.44 or 19.00 mm


2 3
ASTM X2.2 r0 = 0.553 – 3.83 ( a/b) +1.11 ( a/b ) – 0.0969 (a/b )
= -2.56
2 3
ASTM X2.3 r1 = - 2.29 + 5.83 ( a/b ) - 2. 17 ( a/b ) + 0.2067 (a/b )
= 1.87
2 3
ASTM X2.4 r2 = 1.485 – 1.908 ( a/b) +0.815 ( a/b ) – 0.0822 (a/b )
= 0.24
2 4
= 1.33
2
ASTM X2.1 δmax = t1 exp ( ro + r1 x + r2 x )
= 11.35 mm
2 3
ASTM X2.2 r0 = 0.553 – 3.83 (a/b) + 1.11 (a/b) – 0.0969 (a/b)
= -2.56
2 3
ASTM X2.3 r1 = - 2.29 + 5.83 (a/b) - 2. 17 (a/b) + 0.2067 (a/b)
= 1.87
2 3
ASTM X2.4 r2 = 1.485 – 1.908 (a/b) + 0.815 (a/b) – 0.0822 (a/b)
= 0.24
2 4
ASTM X2.5 x = ln{ln [ q1 (ab) / E t ]}
= 1.13
= 6.89 mm
III.B1 Glass 3/4
Date: May 11, 2020
III.B1 Glass 4/4
Item: Analysis of 1.533mW X 2.4mH Outer Vision Glass (8mmHS + 12mmAS + 8mmFT) @ -6.75kPa Hotspot
Date: May 11, 2020
GLASS
BEING

Glass Type = IGU
Glass Treatment :
2
= 3679200.00 mm
3
III.C1 Glass 1/3
Date: May 11, 2020






1.8

Since LR1 < LR2 wps = 6.84 kPa
wps = 6.84 kPa
III.C1 Glass 2/3
Date: May 11, 2020

90
= 17.03 or 19.00 mm


2 3
ASTM X2.2 r0 = 0.553 – 3.83 ( a/b) +1.11 ( a/b ) – 0.0969 (a/b )
= -3.11
2 3
ASTM X2.3 r1 = - 2.29 + 5.83 ( a/b ) - 2. 17 ( a/b ) + 0.2067 (a/b )
= 2.31
2 3
ASTM X2.4 r2 = 1.485 – 1.908 ( a/b) +0.815 ( a/b ) – 0.0822 (a/b )
= 0.18
2 4
= 1.62
ASTM X2.1 δmax = t1 exp ( ro + r1 x + r2 x2 )
= 24.03 mm
2 3
ASTM X2.2 r0 = 0.553 – 3.83 (a/b) + 1.11 (a/b) – 0.0969 (a/b)
= -3.11
2 3
ASTM X2.3 r1 = - 2.29 + 5.83 (a/b) - 2. 17 (a/b) + 0.2067 (a/b)
= 2.31
2 3
ASTM X2.4 r2 = 1.485 – 1.908 (a/b) + 0.815 (a/b) – 0.0822 (a/b)
= 0.18
2 4
ASTM X2.5 x = ln{ln [ q1 (ab) / E t ]}
= 1.47
= 15.73 mm
III.C1 Glass 3/3
Date: May 11, 2020
GLASS
BEING
NOTE: The inner glass lite was analyzed using STAAD Software Analysis considering the application of 890N impact load.
The load share wind pressure of -3.38kPa will be considered in the analysis of inner glass lite. Please see Page III.C1 Glass 3/3.
Neg. Design Wind Pressure, -q = 3.38 kPa Refer to Page III.C1 Glass 3/3.
Impact Live Load, LL = 890.00 N
Glass Type = IGU
Glass Treatment :
2
= 3679200.00 mm
3
III.C2 Glass 1/4
Date: May 11, 2020
Figure 1.1 STAAD Model and Application of Impact Live Load
Allowable Surface Stress of FT, σallow = 73.00 MPa

Please refer to VIII. APPENDICES (A. Engineering Data)
Actual Surface Stress, σact. = 58.117 MPa

Refer to Table 2.1 or Fig. 2.1 Stress Result, Plate 4683
σallow > σact. SAFE
σact.
Stress Ratio = = 0.80 < 1.00
σallow
Table 2.1 STAAD Stress Result
III.C2 Glass 2/4
Date: May 11, 2020
Figure 2.1 Stress Contour

90
= 17.03 or 19.00 mm
3.2 Actual Deflection
■ Actual Deflection @ Full Design, δactual = 13.796 mm

■ Actual Deflection @ Half Design, δactual/2 = 6.898 mm

III.C2 Glass 3/4
Date: May 11, 2020
Table 3.1 Node Displacement Summary for Full Design
Table 3.2 Node Displacement Summary for Half Design
III.C2 Glass 4/4
Item: Analysis of Sealant Bite @ Hotspot Condition (-6.75kPa)
Date: May 11, 2020
GLASS
BEING
Design Wind Pressure, wp = 6.75 kPa

Short Side Length, s = 1533 mm
Long Side Length, l = 2400 mm
Total Length of Sealant, L = 7.866 m
Actual structural sealant bite, Bact1 = 38.00 mm See FIG.2.0
Actual IG secondary sealant bite, Bact2 = 20.00 mm See FIG.2.0
Yield strength of sealant, βsu = 140 kPa
III.D1 Sealant 1/3
Date: May 11, 2020
II. DESIGN OF STRUCTURAL BITE :
• FIG.2.0 : Plan Detail of Sealant Bite
Sealant Adaptor
Structural Sealant
Secondary Sealant
2.1 Check Minimum Structural Sealant Bite
Minimum Structural Sealant Bite, Bmin1 = 0.5 s wp

βsu
(DOW CORNING : Silicone Structural Glazing Manual) = 36.96 mm
or
= 38.00 mm
Bmin1 < Bact SAFE
III.D1 Sealant 2/3
Date: May 11, 2020
2.2 Check Minimum IG Secondary Sealant Bite
Minimum IG Secondary Sealant Bite, Bmin2

(DOW CORNING AMERICAS : Insulating Glass Technical
=
[ 0.5 s wp
βsu
] x 50%
Manual) = 18.48 mm
Bmin2 < Bact SAFE
III. DETERMINE JOINT MOVEMENT CAPABILITY:
3.10 Compute Movement of Substrate
Maximum Temperature, Tmax = 80 °C

Minimum Temperature, Tmin = 50 °C
Thermal Coefficient of Aluminum, ∆ AL = 0.0234
Length of Material, L' = 1.53 m
Movement of Substrate, Me = ( Tmax – Tmin ) ( ∆AL ) ( L )
= 1.076 mm
3.20 Check Movement Capability of Sealant
Width of Sealant, ws = 6.00 mm

Movement of Capability of Sealant, Mc = ± (50 %) (ws)
= 3 mm
Mc > Me SAFE
III.D1 Sealant 3/3
Item: Analysis of Sealant Bite @ Non-Hotspot Condition (-4.25kPa)
Date: May 11, 2020
GLASS
BEING

Short Side Length, s = 1533 mm
Long Side Length, l = 2400 mm
Total Length of Sealant, L = 7.866 m
Actual structural sealant bite, Bact1 = 25.00 mm See FIG.2.0
Actual IG secondary sealant bite, Bact2 = 12.00 mm See FIG.2.0
Yield strength of sealant, βsu = 140 kPa
III.D2 Sealant 1/3
Date: May 11, 2020
II. DESIGN OF STRUCTURAL BITE :
• FIG.2.0 : Plan Detail of Sealant Bite
Structural Sealant
Secondary Sealant
2.1 Check Minimum Structural Sealant Bite
Minimum Structural Sealant Bite, Bmin1 = 0.5 s wp

βsu
(DOW CORNING : Silicone Structural Glazing Manual) = 23.27 mm
or
= 25.00 mm
Bmin1 < Bact SAFE
III.D2 Sealant 2/3
Date: May 11, 2020
2.2 Check Minimum IG Secondary Sealant Bite
Minimum IG Secondary Sealant Bite, Bmin2

(DOW CORNING AMERICAS : Insulating Glass Technical
=
[ 0.5 s wp
βsu
] x 50%
Manual) = 11.63 mm
Bmin2 < Bact SAFE
III. DETERMINE JOINT MOVEMENT CAPABILITY:
3.10 Compute Movement of Substrate
Maximum Temperature, Tmax = 80 °C

Minimum Temperature, Tmin = 50 °C
Thermal Coefficient of Aluminum, ∆ AL = 0.0234
Length of Material, L' = 1.53 m
Movement of Substrate, Me = ( Tmax – Tmin ) ( ∆AL ) ( L )
= 1.076 mm
3.20 Check Movement Capability of Sealant
Width of Sealant, ws = 6.00 mm

Movement of Capability of Sealant, Mc = ± (50 %) (ws)
= 3 mm
Mc > Me SAFE
III.D2 Sealant 3/3
IV. ANALYSIS OF MULLION
NU STAR CEBU

Item: Analysis of Typical Height Intermediate Mullion @ Hotspot Condition (-6.75kPa)
Date: May 11, 2020
TRIBUTARY WIDTH
TRIBUTARY
WIDTH
Max. Neg. Design Wind Pressure, -wp = 6.75 kPa

Tributary Width, tw = 1500.00 mm
Total Length of Mullion, L = 3700.00 mm
Max. Unsupported Length of Mullion, LU = 3700.00 mm
Max Unbraced Length of Mullion, Lb = 2400.00 mm
Unbraced Length of Mullion, Lbs = 1000.00 mm
(location of anti-buckling clip)
Thickness of Glass (IGU), tg = 16.00 mm
Modulus Elasticity of Aluminum, Ea = 69600.00 MPa
Modulus Elasticity of Steel, Es = 200000.00 MPa
3
3
Unit Weight of Aluminum, Ua = 26487.00 N/m
3
Unit Weight of Steel, Us = 76975.00 N/m
2
Tributary Area of Glass, Aglass = 5550000.00 mm
2
Cross sectional Area of Transom, Atransom = 2150.05 mm
Weight of Glass, Wglass = Ug Aglass t
= 2177.82 N
Weight of Mullion, Wmullion = Ua AToatal Lu
= 270.61 N
Weight of Transom, Wtransom = Ua Atransom tw
= 170.85 N
IV.A Mullion 1/15
Date: May 11, 2020
II. SECTION PROPERTIES:
2.1 Member : Male Mullion (6063 - T6)
Cross Sectional Area :

2
Am = 1475.11 mm
Moment of Inertia Along X-axis :
4
Ix-m = 6256188.33 mm
Moment of Inertia Along Y-axis :
4
Iy-m = 644493.60 mm
Distance of Extreme Fiber Along X - Axis :
cx-m = 54.77 mm
Distance of Extreme Fiber Along Y - Axis :
cy-m = 101.77 mm
Section Modulus Along X-axis or at Compression Side :
3
Scx-m = 61473.68 mm
Section Modulus Along Y-axis or at Compression Side :
3
Scy-m = 11766.76 mm
Radius of Gyration Along X -Axis :
rx-m = 65.12 mm
Radius of Gyration Along Y -Axis :
ry-m = 20.90 mm
Torsional Constant:
4
Jm = 251969.98 mm
• FIGURE 2.1 :
IV.A Mullion 2/15
Date: May 11, 2020
2.2 Member : Female Mullion (6063 - T6)

2
Af = 1286.14 mm
4
Ix-f = 5398644.35 mm
4
Iy-f = 261588.93 mm
cx-f = 27.33 mm
cy-f = 106.85 mm
3
Scx-f = 50526.92 mm
3
Scy-f = 9571.53 mm
rx-f = 64.79 mm
ry-f = 14.26 mm
Torsional Constant:
4
Jf = 251588.85 mm
• FIGURE 2.2 :
IV.A Mullion 3/15
Date: May 11, 2020
2.3 Computation of Torsional Constant for Male Mullion :
2.3.1.a Torsional Computation for Rectangular Hollow Tube Element

• Hollow Tube element ( See Figure 2.1 )
t1 = 4 mm
t2 = 3 mm
a = 40 mm
b = 50.7 mm
• Torsion Constant By Roark's Formula :
J1 = 2 t1 t2 ( a - t1 )2 ( b - t2 )2
2 2
( a t1 + b t2 - t1 - t2 )
4
J1 = 249583.148 mm
2.3.2 Torsional Computation for Open Parts, J2
TABLE 2.1 : Torsional Constant for Open Parts ( Refer Figure 2.1 )
no. length of thickness of length over Torsional Constant
item of items element element thickness b/t < 10 b/t > 10
3
n b t b/t n(1/3-0.2t/b)bt nbt3/3
1 1 123.3 3 41.100 0 1109.700

2 1 34 4 8.500 674.13 0
3 2 33.5 3 11.167 0 603.000
TOTAL 674.13 1712.70

Torsional Constant, J2 : 2386.83 mm4
2.3.4 Total Torsional Constant :
Jm = J1 + J2
= 251969.98 mm4
2.4 Computation of Torsional Constant for Female Mullion :

t1 = 4 mm
t2 = 3 mm
a = 40 mm
b = 50.7 mm
J1 = 2 t1 t2 ( a - t1 )2 ( b - t2 )2
( a t1 + b t2 - t12 - t22 )
4
J1 = 249583.148 mm
IV.A Mullion 4/15
Date: May 11, 2020
n b t b/t n(1/3-0.2t/b)bt3 nbt3/3
1 1 42 4 10.500 0 896.000
2 1 123.3 3 41.100 0 1109.700
TOTAL 0.00 2005.70

4
Torsional Constant, J2 : 2005.70 mm
Jf = J1 + J2
= 251588.85 mm4
2.5 Member : Load Share Male Mullion Steel Insert 1

(120MM X 30MM X 8MM THK. CHANNEL STEEL INSERT)
Thickness of Male Steel Insert

tms1 = 8 mm
Depth of Male Steel Insert
dms1 = 120 mm
Width of Male Steel Insert
wms1 = 30 mm
Number of Male Steel Insert
nms1 = 1 pc.
Total Area of Steel Insert :
2
Ams1 = 1312 mm
Total Weight of Steel Insert :
Wms1 = 373.67 N
4
Ix-ms1 = 2257749.33 mm
4
Iy-ms1 = 77268.55 mm
Distance of Centroid Along Y - Axis :
Cy-ms1 = 60.00 mm
IV.A Mullion 5/15
Date: May 11, 2020
2.6 Member : Male Mullion Steel Insert 2

(38MM X25MM X 5MM THK. CHANNEL STEEL INSERT)

tms2 = 5 mm
dms2 = 38 mm
wms2 = 25 mm
nms2 = 1 pc.
2
Ams2 = 388.4468 mm
Wms2 = 110.63 N
4
Ix-ms2 = 76153.61 mm
4
Iy-ms2 = 22219.55 mm
Cy-ms2 = 19.00 mm
Vertical Distance from centroid of steel to centroid of male mullion :
yms2 = 51.40 mm
Horizontal Distance from centroid of steel to centroid of male mullion :
xms2 = 1.30 mm
IV.A Mullion 6/15
Date: May 11, 2020
2.7 Member : Female Mullion Steel Insert 1 (NO STEEL INSERT)
Thickness of Female Steel Insert

tfs1 = 0 mm
Depth of Female Steel Insert
dfs1 = 0 mm
Width of Female Steel Insert
wfs1 = 0 mm
Number of Female Steel Insert
nfs1 = 0 pcs
Total Area of Steel Stiffener :
2
Afs1 = 0 mm
Total Weight of Steel Stiffener :
Wfs1 = 0.00 N
4
Ix-fs1 = 0.00 mm
4
Iy-fs1 = 0.00 mm
Cy-fs1 = 0.00 mm
2.8 Member : Composite Female Mullion Steel Insert 2


tfs2 = 5 mm
dfs2 = 38 mm
wfs2 = 25 mm
nfs2 = 1 pc.
2
Afs2 = 388.4468 mm
Wfs2 = 110.63 N
4
Ix-fs2 = 76153.61 mm
4
Iy-fs2 = 22219.55 mm
Cy-fs2 = 19.00 mm
Vertical Distance from centroid of steel to centroid of female mullion :
yfs2 = 46.30 mm
Horizontal Distance from centroid of steel to centroid of female mullion :
xfs2 = 7.80 mm
IV.A Mullion 7/15
Date: May 11, 2020
III. TOTAL MOMENT OF INERTIA :
Modular Ratio:
n = Es x Ea - 1
= 2.874
Moment of Inertia Along X-axis (Load Share of Male Steel Insert 1):
Ix-Lms1 = n ( Ix-ms1 )
= 6487785.44 mm4
Transfer Moment of Inertia Along X-axis (Composite Male Steel Insert 2):
Ix-Tms1 = n ( Ix-ms2 + Ams2 yms2a2 )
= 3167857.80 mm4
Transfer Moment of Inertia Along X-axis (Composite Female Steel Insert 2):
Ix-Tfs1 = n ( Ix-fs2 + Afs2 yfs2a2 )
4
= 2611675.65 mm
Moment of Inertia Along Y-axis (Load Share of Male Steel Insert 1):
Iy-Lms1 = n ( Iy-ms1 )
= 222036.07 mm4
Transfer Moment of Inertia Along Y-axis (Composite Male Steel Insert 2):
Iy-Tms1 = n ( Iy-ms2 + Ams2 xms2a2 )
= 65735.69 mm4
Transfer Moment of Inertia Along Y-axis (Composite Female Steel Insert 2):
Iy-Tfs1 = n ( Iy-fs2 + Afs2 xfs2a2 )
= 131760.49 mm4
Total Moment of Inertia Along X-axis :

Ix-T = Ix-m + Ix-f + Ix-Lms1 + Ix-Tms1 + Ix-Tfs1
= 23922151.57 mm4
Total Moment of Inertia Along Y-axis :

Iy-T = Iy-m + Iy-f + Iy-Lms1 + Iy-Tms1 + Iy-Tfs1
= 1325614.77 mm4
Total Cross Sectional Area of Split Mullion :

ATOTAL = Am + Af
= 2761.25 mm2
IV. COMPUTE FOR ACTUAL LOADINGS NORMAL TO THE GLASS SURFACE :
Uniformly Distributed Load due to Wind Load

-WWL = -wp tw
= 10125.00 N/m
IV.A Mullion 8/15
Date: May 11, 2020
V. DESIGN MOMENT AND SHEAR :
Maximum Design Moment, Mmax = 15516000.00 N-mm

Refer to Fig.5.0-c or Table 5.0, Moment Diagram, Beam 9
Maximum Design Shear, Vmax = 25000.00 N

Refer to Fig.5.0-d or Table 5.0, Shear Diagram, Beam 10
Figure 5.0 Staad Loading Diagram
a. Staad Model b. Beam Labels c. Moment Diagram d. Shear Diagram
Table 5.0 Staad Beam Loading Report
IV.A Mullion 9/15
Date: May 11, 2020
VI. CHECK MAXIMUM DEFLECTION:
Allowable Deflection, δallow = Lu

175
= 21.14 mm
Nominal Deflection , δnom = 7.534 mm

Refer to Fig.6.0-a or Table 6.0, Staad Report, Beam 15
Maximum Deflection, dmax = dstaad ( Ix-f + Ix-m ) / Ix-T

= 3.671 mm
Since δallow < δmax Therefore, Aluminum Mullion is SAFE in deflection.
Table 6.0 Staad Beam Displacement Report
VII. CHECK BENDING STRESS PER ALUMINUM DESIGN MANUAL:

Refer to ADM Table 2.24: Allowable Stresses For Building Type Structures
6063 – T6 Extrusions and Pipe
7.1 Member: Male Mullion Extrusion
Sec. 3.4.2 Tension in Beam "Ft"

(extreme fiber, net section)
Allowable Tensile Stress, Ft = 15.00 ksi

= 103.43 MPa
Sec. 3.4.11 Compression in Component of Beam "Fb1" :

(compression in beams, extreme fiber, gross section: single web shapes)
Lower Slenderness Limit, S1 = 22.00

Upper Slenderness Limit, S2 = 94.00
Slenderness, S = Lbs
ry-m
= 47.84
S1 < S < S2
Lateral Buckling Check, Fb1 = 16.7 - 0.073 S
= 13.21 ksi
= 91.07 MPa
IV.A Mullion 10/15
Date: May 11, 2020

(element uniform compression gross section: Flat elements supported on both edges)
Width of section or Element, b = 34.00 mm

Thickness of Section or Element, t = 4.00 mm
Slenderness, S = b
t
= 8.50
S1 > S < S2
Lateral Buckling Check, Fb2 = 15.00 ksi
= 103.43 MPa

(elements in bending in own plane, gross section: flat elements supported on both edges)
Width of section or Element, h = 123.30 mm

Slenderness, S = h
t
= 41.10
S1 > S < S2
= 137.90 MPa
7.2 Allowable Bending Stress
Allowable Bending, Fb-m = 91.07 MPa
7.3 Check Actual Bending Stress in Mullion
Max. Moment Carried by Male Mullion, Mm = Mmax Ix-m

Ix-T
= 4057787.94 N-mm
Maximum Bending Stress, fb-m = Mmax cy-m

Ix-m
= 66.01 MPa
Since fb-m < Fb-m Therefore, male mullion is SAFE on bending stress.
IV.A Mullion 11/15
Date: May 11, 2020
7.4 Member: Female Mullion Extrusion


= 103.43 MPa

(compression in beams, extreme fiber, gross section: tubular shapes)

ry-f
= 70.12
S1 < S < S2
= 11.58 ksi
= 79.85 MPa


Slenderness, S = b
t
= 8.93
S1 > S < S2
= 103.43 MPa


Slenderness, S = h
t
= 41.10
S1 > S < S2
= 137.90 MPa
Allowable Bending, Fb-f = 79.85 MPa
IV.A Mullion 12/15
Date: May 11, 2020
Max. Moment Carried by Female Mullion, = Mmax Ix-f

Mf Ix-T
= 3501581.60 N-mm
Maximum Bending Stress, fb-f = Mmax cy-f

Ix-f
= 69.30 MPa
Since fb-f < Fb-f Therefore, female mullion is SAFE on bending stress.
VIII. COMPUTE AXIAL LOADINGS :
Total Axial Dead load, RDL = 1.1 (Wglass + Wmullion + Wtransom + Wms )
= 3292.23 N
IX. COMPUTE AXIAL STRESSES PER ALUMINUM DESIGN MANUAL :

9.1 Member: Male Mullion extrusion
Sec. 3.4.1 Tension,Axial "Ft"


= 103.43 MPa
Allowable Compressive Strength, Fa-m = 103.43 MPa
9.2 Actual Axial Compressive Stress
Actual Axial Compressive Stress, fa-m = RDL

Am
= 2.23 MPa
Since fa-m < Fa-m Therefore, male mullion is SAFE on axial compressive stress.
X. COMPUTE AXIAL STRESSES PER ALUMINUM DESIGN MANUAL :

10.1 Member: Female Mullion extrusion


= 103.43 MPa
IV.A Mullion 13/15
Date: May 11, 2020
10.2 Allowable Axial Compressive Stress
Allowable Compressive Strength, Fa-f = 103.43 MPa
Actual Axial Compressive Stress, fa-f = RDL

Af
= 2.56 MPa
Since fa-f < Fa-f Therefore, female mullion is SAFE on axial compressive stress.
XI. CHECK UNDER COMBINED AXIAL COMPRESSION AND BENDING STRESSES :
11.1 Member : Male Mullion Extrusion
Actual Bending Stress, fb-m = 66.01 MPa

Actual Compressive Stress, fa-m = 2.23 MPa
Allowable Bending Stress, Fb-m = 91.07 MPa
Allowable Axial Stress, Fa-m = 103.43 MPa
fb-m fa-m
+ = 0.75
Fb-m Fa-m
Since CSR < 1.00 Therefore, male mullion extrusion is ADEQUATE.
11.2 Member : Female Mullion Extrusion
Actual Bending Stress, fb-f = 69.30 MPa

Actual Compressive Stress, fa-f = 2.56 MPa
Allowable Bending Stress, Fb-f = 79.85 MPa
Allowable Axial Stress, Fa-f = 103.43 MPa
fb-f fa-f
+ = 0.89
Fb-f Fa-f
Since CSR < 1.00 Therefore, female mullion extrusion is ADEQUATE.
IV.A Mullion 14/15
Date: May 11, 2020
XII. CHECK BENDING STRESS OF STEEL INSERT
12.1 Check Actual Bending Stress (Male Mullion Steel Insert 1)
Minimum Yield Strength of Steel, Fy = 248 MPa

Steel Allowable Bending Stress, Fbs = 0.6 Fy
= 149 MPa
Max. Moment Carried by Steel Insert, Mms1 = Mmax n Ix-ms1

Ix-T
= 4208002.72 N-mm
Maximum Bending Stress, fb-ms1 = Mms1 cy-ms1

(Compression on Extreme Fiber) Ix-ms1
= 111.83 MPa
Remark : Since fb-ms1 < Fbs SAFE

= 149 MPa

Ix-T
= 141935.41 N-mm

= 35.41 MPa
12.3 Check Actual Bending Stress (Female Mullion Steel Insert 2)

= 149 MPa
Max. Moment Carried by Steel Insert, Mfs2 = Mmax n Ix-fs2

Ix-T
= 141935.41 N-mm
Maximum Bending Stress, fb-fs2 = Mfs2 cy-fs2

(Compression on Extreme Fiber) Ix-fs2
= 35.41 MPa
Remark : Since fb-fs2 < Fbs SAFE
IV.A Mullion 15/15
Item: Analysis of Typical Height Intermediate Mullion @ Non-Hotspot Condition (-4.25kPa)
Date: May 11, 2020
TRIBUTARY WIDTH
TRIBUTARY WIDTH

Tributary Width, tw = 1500.00 mm
Total Length of Mullion, L = 3700.00 mm
Max. Unsupported Length of Mullion, LU = 3700.00 mm
Max Unbraced Length of Mullion, Lb = 2400.00 mm
Unbraced Length of Mullion, Lbs = 1000.00 mm
(location of anti-buckling clip)
Thickness of Glass (IGU), tg = 16.00 mm
Modulus Elasticity of Steel, Es = 200000.00 MPa
3
3
3
2
Tributary Area of Glass, Aglass = 5550000.00 mm
2
Weight of Glass, Wglass = Ug Aglass t
= 2177.82 N
Weight of Mullion, Wmullion = Ua AToatal Lu
= 270.61 N
Weight of Transom, Wtransom = Ua Atransom tw
= 170.85 N
IV.B Mullion 1/15
Date: May 11, 2020
2.1 Member : Male Mullion (6063 - T6)

2
Am = 1475.11 mm
4
Ix-m = 6256188.33 mm
4
Iy-m = 644493.60 mm
cx-m = 54.77 mm
cy-m = 101.77 mm
3
Scx-m = 61473.68 mm
3
Scy-m = 11766.76 mm
rx-m = 65.12 mm
ry-m = 20.90 mm
Torsional Constant:
4
Jm = 251969.98 mm
• FIGURE 2.1 :
IV.B Mullion 2/15
Date: May 11, 2020
2.2 Member : Female Mullion (6063 - T6)

2
Af = 1286.14 mm
4
Ix-f = 5398644.35 mm
4
Iy-f = 261588.93 mm
cx-f = 27.33 mm
cy-f = 106.85 mm
3
Scx-f = 50526.92 mm
3
Scy-f = 9571.53 mm
rx-f = 64.79 mm
ry-f = 14.26 mm
Torsional Constant:
4
Jf = 251588.85 mm
• FIGURE 2.2 :
IV.B Mullion 3/15
Date: May 11, 2020
2.3 Computation of Torsional Constant for Male Mullion :

t1 = 4 mm
t2 = 3 mm
a = 40 mm
b = 50.7 mm
J1 = 2 t1 t2 ( a - t1 )2 ( b - t2 )2
2 2
( a t1 + b t2 - t1 - t2 )
4
J1 = 249583.148 mm
3
n b t b/t n(1/3-0.2t/b)bt nbt3/3
1 1 123.3 3 41.100 0 1109.700

2 1 34 4 8.500 674.13 0
3 2 33.5 3 11.167 0 603.000
TOTAL 674.13 1712.70

Jm = J1 + J2
= 251969.98 mm4
2.4 Computation of Torsional Constant for Female Mullion :

t1 = 4 mm
t2 = 3 mm
a = 40 mm
b = 50.7 mm
J1 = 2 t1 t2 ( a - t1 )2 ( b - t2 )2
( a t1 + b t2 - t12 - t22 )
4
J1 = 249583.148 mm
IV.B Mullion 4/15
Date: May 11, 2020
n b t b/t n(1/3-0.2t/b)bt3 nbt3/3
1 1 42 4 10.500 0 896.000
2 1 123.3 3 41.100 0 1109.700
TOTAL 0.00 2005.70

4
Torsional Constant, J2 : 2005.70 mm
Jf = J1 + J2
= 251588.85 mm4
2.5 Member : Male Mullion Steel Insert 1 (NO STEEL INSERT)

tms1 = 0 mm
dms1 = 0 mm
wms1 = 0 mm
nms1 = 0 pc.
2
Ams1 = 0 mm
Wms1 = 0.00 N
4
Ix-ms1 = 0.00 mm
4
Iy-ms1 = 0.00 mm
Cy-ms1 = 0.00 mm
IV.B Mullion 5/15
Date: May 11, 2020
2.6 Member : Composite Male Mullion Steel Insert 2


tms2 = 5 mm
dms2 = 38 mm
wms2 = 25 mm
nms2 = 1 pc.
2
Ams2 = 388.4468 mm
Wms2 = 110.63 N
4
Ix-ms2 = 76153.61 mm
4
Iy-ms2 = 22219.55 mm
Cy-ms2 = 19.00 mm
Vertical Distance from centroid of steel to centroid of male mullion :
yms2 = 51.40 mm
Horizontal Distance from centroid of steel to centroid of male mullion :
xms2 = 1.30 mm
IV.B Mullion 6/15
Date: May 11, 2020
2.7 Member : Female Mullion Steel Insert 1 (NO STEEL INSERT)

tfs1 = 0 mm
dfs1 = 0 mm
wfs1 = 0 mm
nfs1 = 0 pcs
2
Afs1 = 0 mm
Wfs1 = 0.00 N
4
Ix-fs1 = 0.00 mm
4
Iy-fs1 = 0.00 mm
Cy-fs1 = 0.00 mm
2.8 Member : Composite Female Mullion Steel Insert 2


tfs2 = 5 mm
dfs2 = 38 mm
wfs2 = 25 mm
nfs2 = 1 pc.
2
Afs2 = 388.4468 mm
Wfs2 = 0.00 N
4
Ix-fs2 = 76153.61 mm
4
Iy-fs2 = 22219.55 mm
Cy-fs2 = 19.00 mm
Vertical Distance from centroid of steel to centroid of female mullion :
yfs2 = 46.30 mm
Horizontal Distance from centroid of steel to centroid of female mullion :
xfs2 = 7.80 mm
IV.B Mullion 7/15
Date: May 11, 2020
Modular Ratio:
n = Es x Ea - 1
= 2.874
Transfer Moment of Inertia Along X-axis (Composite Male Steel Insert 2):
2
Ix-Tms1 = n ( Ix-ms2 + Ams2 yms2a )
= 3167857.80 mm4
Transfer Moment of Inertia Along X-axis (Composite Female Steel Insert 2):
2
Ix-Tfs1 = n ( Ix-fs2 + Afs2 yfs2a )
= 2611675.65 mm4
Transfer Moment of Inertia Along Y-axis (Composite Male Steel Insert 2):
Iy-Tms1 = n ( Iy-ms2 + Ams2 xms2a2 )
4
= 65735.69 mm
Transfer Moment of Inertia Along Y-axis (Composite Female Steel Insert 2):
Iy-Tfs1 = n ( Iy-fs2 + Afs2 xfs2a2 )
= 131760.49 mm4
Total Moment of Inertia Along X-axis :

Ix-T = Ix-m + Ix-f + Ix-Tms1 + Ix-Tfs1
= 17434366.13 mm4
Total Moment of Inertia Along Y-axis :

Iy-T = Iy-m + Iy-f + Iy-Tms1 + Iy-Tfs1
= 1103578.70 mm4
Total Cross Sectional Area of Split Mullion :

ATOTAL = Am + Af
= 2761.25 mm2
Uniformly Distributed Load due to Wind Load

-WWL = -wp tw
= 6375.00 N/m
IV.B Mullion 8/15
Date: May 11, 2020

Refer to Fig.5.0-c or Table 5.0, Moment Diagram, Beam 9

Refer to Fig.5.0-d or Table 5.0, Shear Diagram, Beam 10
Figure 5.0 Staad Loading Diagram
a. Staad Model b. Beam Labels c. Moment Diagram d. Shear Diagram
Table 5.0 Staad Beam Loading Report
IV.B Mullion 9/15
Date: May 11, 2020
Allowable Deflection, δallow = Lu

175
= 21.14 mm
Nominal Deflection , δnom = 6.157 mm

Refer to Fig.6.0-a or Table 6.0, Staad Report, Beam 10
Maximum Deflection, dmax = dstaad ( Ix-f + Ix-m ) / Ix-T

= 4.116 mm
Since δallow < δmax Therefore, Aluminum Mullion is SAFE in deflection.
Table 6.0 Staad Beam Displacement Report
VII. CHECK BENDING STRESS PER ALUMINUM DESIGN MANUAL:

7.1 Member: Male Mullion Extrusion


= 103.43 MPa


ry-m
= 47.84
S1 < S < S2
= 13.21 ksi
= 91.07 MPa
IV.B Mullion 10/15
Date: May 11, 2020


Slenderness, S = b
t
= 8.50
S1 > S < S2
= 103.43 MPa


Slenderness, S = h
t
= 41.10
S1 > S < S2
= 137.90 MPa
Allowable Bending, Fb-m = 91.07 MPa
Max. Moment Carried by Male Mullion, Mm = Mmax Ix-m

Ix-T
= 4009381.09 N-mm
Maximum Bending Stress, fb-m = Mmax cy-m

Ix-m
= 65.22 MPa
Since fb-m < Fb-m Therefore, male mullion is SAFE on bending stress.
IV.B Mullion 11/15
Date: May 11, 2020
7.4 Member: Female Mullion Extrusion


= 103.43 MPa

(compression in beams, extreme fiber, gross section: tubular shapes)

ry-f
= 70.12
S1 < S < S2
= 11.58 ksi
= 79.85 MPa


Slenderness, S = b
t
= 8.93
S1 > S < S2
= 103.43 MPa


Slenderness, S = h
t
= 41.10
S1 > S < S2
= 137.90 MPa
Allowable Bending, Fb-f = 79.85 MPa
IV.B Mullion 12/15
Date: May 11, 2020
Max. Moment Carried by Female Mullion, = Mmax Ix-f

Mf Ix-T
= 3459809.94 N-mm
Maximum Bending Stress, fb-f = Mmax cy-f

Ix-f
= 68.47 MPa
Since fb-f < Fb-f Therefore, female mullion is SAFE on bending stress.
Total Axial Dead load, RDL = 1.1 (Wglass + Wmullion + Wtransom + Wms )
= 2881.20 N

9.1 Member: Male Mullion extrusion


= 103.43 MPa
Allowable Compressive Strength, Fa-m = 103.43 MPa
Actual Axial Compressive Stress, fa-m = RDL

Am
= 1.95 MPa
Since fa-m < Fa-m Therefore, male mullion is SAFE on axial compressive stress.
X. COMPUTE AXIAL STRESSES PER ALUMINUM DESIGN MANUAL :

10.1 Member: Female Mullion extrusion


= 103.43 MPa
IV.B Mullion 13/15
Date: May 11, 2020
10.2 Allowable Axial Compressive Stress
Allowable Compressive Strength, Fa-f = 103.43 MPa
Actual Axial Compressive Stress, fa-f = RDL

Af
= 2.24 MPa
Since fa-f < Fa-f Therefore, female mullion is SAFE on axial compressive stress.
XI. CHECK UNDER COMBINED AXIAL COMPRESSION AND BENDING STRESSES :
11.1 Member : Male Mullion Extrusion
Actual Bending Stress, fb-m = 65.22 MPa

Actual Compressive Stress, fa-m = 1.95 MPa
Allowable Bending Stress, Fb-m = 91.07 MPa
Allowable Axial Stress, Fa-m = 103.43 MPa
fb-m fa-m
+ = 0.74
Fb-m Fa-m
Since CSR < 1.00 Therefore, male mullion extrusion is ADEQUATE.
11.2 Member : Female Mullion Extrusion
Actual Bending Stress, fb-f = 68.47 MPa

Actual Compressive Stress, fa-f = 2.24 MPa
Allowable Bending Stress, Fb-f = 79.85 MPa
Allowable Axial Stress, Fa-f = 103.43 MPa
fb-f fa-f
+ = 0.88
Fb-f Fa-f
Since CSR < 1.00 Therefore, female mullion extrusion is ADEQUATE.
IV.B Mullion 14/15
Date: May 11, 2020
XII. CHECK BENDING STRESS OF STEEL INSERT

= 149 MPa

Ix-T
= 140242.21 N-mm

= 34.99 MPa
12.2 Check Actual Bending Stress (Female Mullion Steel Insert 2)

= 149 MPa
Max. Moment Carried by Steel Insert, Mfs2 = Mmax n Ix-fs2

Ix-T
= 140242.21 N-mm
Maximum Bending Stress, fb-fs2 = Mfs2 cy-fs2

(Compression on Extreme Fiber) Ix-fs2
= 34.99 MPa
Remark : Since fb-fs2 < Fbs SAFE
IV.B Mullion 15/15
V. ANALYSIS OF TRANSOM
NU STAR CEBU

Item: Analysis of Intermediate Transom @ Hotspot Condition (-6.75kPa)
Date: May 11, 2020
th1
th2

Height of Upper Mullion, h1 = 1300.00 mm
Height of Bottom Mullion, h2 = 2400.00 mm
Width of Mullion, tm = 100.00 mm
Center to Center spacing bet. Mullions, Lc = 1500.00 mm
Unbraced length of transom, Lb = Lc - tm
= 1400.00 mm
Location of Setting Block from edge, a = Lb / 4
= 350.00 mm
Tributary Height of Upper Panel, th1 = h1
= 2
= 650.00 mm
Tributary Height of Lower Panel, th2 = Lc
3
= 500.00 mm
Tributary Area of Upper Panel, A1 = Lb th1
= 910000.00 mm2
Tributary Area of Lower Panel, A2 = Lb th2
= 700000.00 mm2
Equivalent Tributary Height of Transom, th = th1 + th2
= 1150.00 mm
V.A Transom 1/7
Date: May 11, 2020
Thickness of Glass carried (IGU), tg = 16.00 mm

Actual Width of Glass, wg = 1500.00 mm
Actual Length of Glass, lg = 2350.00 mm
3
3
2
Unit Weight of Steel, Us = 76975.00 mm
2.1 Member : Intermediate Transom (6063 - T6)

2
At = 2150.05 mm
Itx = 3663090.20 mm4
Ity = 10143908.30 mm4
ctx = 101.80 mm
cty = 50.38 mm
Section Modulus Along X-Axis
3
Sctx = 72709.07 mm
Section Modulus Along Y-Axis
3
Scty = 99649.38 mm
rx = 41.28 mm
ry = 68.69 mm
Torsional Constant:
J = 6752100.02 mm4
• FIGURE 2.1 :
V.A Transom 2/7
Date: May 11, 2020
2.2 Computation of Torsional Constant for Transom :

t1 = 3 mm
t2 = 3 mm
a = 100 mm
b = 186 mm
2 2
J1 = 2 t1 t2 ( a - t1 ) ( b - t2 )
2 2
( a t1 + b t2 - t1 - t2 )
4
J1 = 6752100.021 mm
III. CHECK LOADINGS DUE TO WIND LOAD:
Equiv. Uniformly Dist. Wind Load, WWL = -wp th

= 7762.50 N/m
IV. DESIGN MOMENT AND SHEAR :
Maximum Design Moment, Mmax ( y - y) = WWL Lb2

(@ end of transom) 8
= 1901812.50 N-mm
Maximum Design Shear, Vmax = WWL Lb

2
= 5433.75 N
V. CHECK MAXIMUM DEFLECTION:
Allowable Deflection, δallow = Lb

175
= 8.00 mm
Maximum Deflection , δmax = 5 WWL Lb4

384 Ea Ity
= 0.55 mm
Since δallow < δmax Therefore, transom is SAFE on deflection normal to glass.
V.A Transom 3/7
Date: May 11, 2020
VI. CHECK BENDING STRESS PER ALUMINUM DESIGN MANUAL:



= 103.43 MPa
Sec. 3.4.14 Compression in beam "Fb1" :

(extreme fiber, gross section:tubular shapes)

Slenderness, S = 2 Lb Sctx
( Ity J )1/2
= 24.60
S1 > S < S2
= 103.43 MPa
Sec. 3.4.16 Compression in Component of Beam, "Fb2" :


Slenderness, S = b/t
= 30.63
S1 < S < S2
Lateral Buckling Check, Fb2 = 19.0 - 0.17 b/t
= 13.79 ksi
= 95.10 MPa
Sec. 3.4.18 Compression Component in beam, "Fb3"

(element in bending in own plane, gross section: flat element supported on both edges)
Height of section or Element, h = 171.00 mm

Slenderness, S = h/t
= 57.00
S1 < S < S2
Local Buckling Check, Fb3 = 27.9 - 0.155 h/t
= 19.07 ksi
= 131.45 MPa
Allowable Bending, Fbx = 95.10 MPa
V.A Transom 4/7
Date: May 11, 2020
6.2 Check Actual Bending Stress
Actual Bending, fbx = Mmax cty

Itx
= 26.16 MPa
Since fbx < Fbx Therefore, transom is SAFE for bending stress normal to glass.
VII. CHECK LOADINGS DUE TO DEAD LOAD:
7.1 Check for Loadings
7.1.1 Uniformly Distributed Load due to Self weight ( S.W.) of Transom :

S.W. of Transom & Accessories, WDL = 1.10 ( Ua At )
= 62.64 N/m
7.1.2 Concentrated Load @ L / 4 :

Total Weight of Glass & Accessories (window)
2 Pg = A1 Ug tg
= 357.08 N
Concentrated Load @ L / 4, Pg = 178.54 N
VIII. DESIGN MOMENT AND SHEAR:
Maximum Design Moment, Mmax = WDL Lb2

+ Pg a
( for Uniform Load & Two equidistant Point Load ) 8
= 77837.31 N-mm
Maximum Design Shear, Vmax = WDL Lb

+ Pg
2
= 222.39 N
IX. CHECK MAXIMUM DEFLECTION DUE TO DEAD LOAD:
Pg a (3Lb2 - 4a )
2
Maximum Deflection , δmax = 5 WDL Lb4
+
384 Ea Itx 24 Ea Itx
= 0.07 mm
Since δmax < δallow Therefore, transom is SAFE on deflection parallel to glass.
V.A Transom 5/7
Date: May 11, 2020
X. CHECK BENDING STRESSES PER ALUMINUM DESIGN MANUAL:



= 103.43 MPa


= 57.00
S1 < S > S2
Lateral Buckling Check, Fb1 = 484 / b/t
= 8.49 ksi
= 58.55 MPa

Height of section or Element, b = 91.90 mm

= 30.63
S1 > S < S2
Local Buckling Check, Fb2 = 20.00 ksi
= 137.90 MPa
10.1 Allowable Bending Stress (consider Fb1 to govern)
Allow. Bending Stress Parallel to Glass, Fby = 58.55 MPa
Actual Bending Stress Parallel to Glass, fby = Mmax cty

Itx
= 1.07 MPa
Since fby < Fby Therefore, transom is SAFE on bending stress parallel to glass.
V.A Transom 6/7
Date: May 11, 2020
XI. CHECK SHEAR IN ELEMENT:
11.1 Sec 3.4.21 Shear in Elements , fsx

(gross section: Stiffened flat elements supported on both edges)
Shorter Dimension of rectangular panel, a1 = 91.90 mm

Longer Dimension of rectangular panel, a2 = 171.00 mm
Equivalent Width of Rectangular panel, ae = a1
2
√ 1 + 0.70 (a1/a2)
= 83.82 mm
Thickness of Transom, t = 3.00 mm
Lower Slenderness Limit, S1 = -
Slenderness, S = ae/t
= 27.94
S < S2
Allowable Shear Normal to Glass, Fsx = 8.50 ksi
= 58.61 MPa
Actual Shear Normal to Glass, fsx = Vmax

At
= 2.53 MPa
Since fsx < Fsx Therefore, transom is SAFE on Shearing Stress Normal to Glass.
11.2 Sec 3.4.21 Shear in Elements, fsy
Allowable Shear Parallel to Glass, Fsy = 8.50 ksi

= 58.61 MPa
Actual Shear Parallel to Glass, fsy = Vmax

At
= 0.10 MPa
Since fsy < Fsy Therefore, transom is SAFE on shearing stress parallel to glass.
XII. CHECK UNDER COMBINED BENDING AND SHEAR STRESS RATIO (CSR):
Actual Bending Stress Normal to Glass, fby = 26.16 MPa

Actual Bending Stress Parallel to Glass, fbx = 1.07 MPa
Allow. Bending Stress Normal to Glass, Fby = 95.10 MPa
Allow. Bending Stress Parallel to Glass, Fbx = 58.55 MPa
Actual Shear Normal to Glass, fsy = 2.53 MPa
Actual Shear Parallel to Glass, fsx = 0.10 MPa
Allowable Shear Normal to Glass, Fsy = 58.61 MPa
Allowable Shear Parallel to Glass, Fsx = 58.61 MPa
2 2
fby fbx fsy fsx
+ + + = 0.30
Fby Fbx Fsy2 Fsx2
Since CSR < 1.00 Therefore, transom extrusion is ADEQUATE.
V.A Transom 7/7
Item: Analysis of Stack Joint @ Hotspot Condition (-6.75kPa)
Date: May 11, 2020
th1
th2

Height of Upper Mullion, h1 = 2400.00 mm
Height of Bottom Mullion, h2 1300.00 mm
Width of Unitized Mullion, tm = 100.00 mm
Center to Center Spacing bet. Mullions, Lc = 1500.00 mm
Unbraced Length of Transom, Lb = Lc - tm
= 1400.00 mm
Location of Setting Block from edge, a = Lb / 4
= 350.00 mm
Tributary Height of Upper Panel, th1 = Lc
= 3
= 500.00 mm
Tributary Height of Lower Panel, th2 = h2
2
= 650.00 mm
Equivalent Tributary Height of Transom, th th1 + th2
= 1150.00 mm
Thickness of Glass carried (IGU), tg = 18.00 mm
3
3
2
Unit Weight of Steel, Us = 76975.00 mm
Area of Glass @ Upper Panel, Aglass = Lb th1
2
= 700000.00 mm
V.B Stack Joint 1/14
Date: May 11, 2020
2.1 Aluminum Section : Stack Sill (6063-T6)

2
As-s = 1686.29 mm
Ixs-s = 965756.42 mm4
4
Iys-s = 6388107.64 mm
cxs-s = 97.99 mm
cys-s = 41.83 mm
3
Scxs-s = 65188.23 mm
3
Scys-s = 23088.09 mm
rxs-s = 23.93 mm
rys-s = 61.55 mm
Torsional Constant:
Js-s = 704107.19 mm4
• FIG.2.1 :
2.2 Aluminum Section : Stack Head (6063-T6)

As-h = 2682.49 mm2
Ixs-h = 2711088.88 mm4
4
Iys-h = 11457569.43 mm
cxs-h = 104.57 mm
cys-h = 75.54 mm
3
Scxs-h = 109572.71 mm
3
Scys-h = 35887.36 mm
rxs-h = 31.79 mm
Date: May 11, 2020

rys-h = 65.35 mm
Torsional Constant:
4
Js-h = 872032.739 mm
• FIG.2.2 :
2.3 Computation of Torsional Constant for Stack Sill :

t1 = 3 mm
t2 = 3 mm
a = 45.2 mm
b = 98 mm
J1 = 2 t1 t2 ( a - t1 )2 ( b - t2 )2
( a t1 + b t2 - t12 - t22 )
4
J1 = 702860.685 mm
n b t b/t n(1/3-0.2t/b)bt3 3
nbt /3
1 1 68.5 3 22.833 0 616.500

2 1 70 3 23.333 0 630.000
TOTAL 0.00 1246.50

Js-s = J1 + J2
= 704107.19 mm4
Date: May 11, 2020
2.4 Computation of Torsional Constant for Stack Head :

t1 = 3 mm
t2 = 3 mm
a = 35.1 mm
b = 171 mm
J1 = 2 t1 t2 ( a - t1 )2 ( b - t2 )2
( a t1 + b t2 - t12 - t22 )
4
J1 = 872032.739 mm

n b t b/t n(1/3-0.2t/b)bt3 nbt3/3
1 1 65.6 4.4 14.909 0 1862.690

2 1 67 4 16.750 0 1429.333
TOTAL 0.00 3292.02

Js-h = J1 + J2
= 875324.76 mm4

Ix-T = Ixs-s + Ixs-h
4
= 3676845.30 mm

Iy-T = Iys-s + Iys-h
= 17845677.07 mm4
Total Cross Sectional Area :

ATOTAL = As-s +As-h
= 4368.77 mm2
Date: May 11, 2020
IV. CHECK LOADINGS DUE TO WIND LOAD:
Equiv. Uniformly Dist. Wind Load, WWL = wp th

= 7.76 N/mm
2
Maximum Design Moment, Mmax ( y - y ) = WWL Lb
(@ end of transom) 8
= 1901812.50 N-mm
Maximum Design Shear, Vmax = WWL Lb

2
= 5433.75 N
Allowable Deflection, δallow = Lb

175
= 8.00 mm
Maximum Deflection, δmax = 5 WWL Lb4

384 Ea Iy-T
= 0.31 mm
Since δmax < δallow Therefore, stack joint is SAFE on deflection normal to glass.
VII. CHECK BENDING STRESS PER ALUMINUM DESIGN MANUAL

7.1 Member: Stack Sill


= 103.43 MPa
Date: May 11, 2020

(extreme fiber, gross section: tubular shapes)
Slenderness, S = 2 Lb Scxs-s
1/2
( Iys-s Js-s )
= 86.06
> S < S2
= 103.43 MPa


= 15.07
S1 > S < S2
= 103.43 MPa


= 32.67
S1 > S < S2
= 137.90 MPa
Max. moment carried by stack sill, Ms-s = Mmax Iys-s

Iy-T
= 680780.16 N-mm
Actual Bending Stress Normal to Glass, fby = Ms-s cxs-s

Iys-s
= 10.44 MPa
Since fby < Fby Therefore, stack sill is SAFE on bending stress normal to glass.
Date: May 11, 2020
7.4 Member: Stack Head


= 103.43 MPa

Slenderness, S = 2 Lb Scxs-h
½
(Iys-h Js-h)
= 97.06
S1 > S < S2

= 103.43 MPa


= 11.70
S1 > S < S2

= 103.43 MPa


= 57.00
S1 < S < S2
Local Buckling Check, Fb3 = 27.9 - 0.155 S

= 19.07 ksi
= 131.45 MPa
Date: May 11, 2020
Max. moment carried by stack head, Ms-h = Mmax Iys-h

Iy-T
= 1221032.34 N-mm
Actual Bending Stress Normal to Glass, fby = Ms-h cxs-h

Iys-h
= 11.144 MPa
Since fby < Fby Therefore, stack head is SAFE on bending stress normal to glass.
VIII. CHECK LOADINGS DUE TO DEAD LOAD:
Uniformly Distributed Load due to Self weight ( S.W.) of Stack Sill :

WDL s-s = 1.10 ( Ua As-s )
= 49.13 N/m
Concentrated Load @ L / 4 :
Total Weight of Glass & Accessories
2 Pg = Aglass Ug tg
= 309.02 N
Concentrated Load @ L / 4, Pg = 154.51 N
Uniformly Distributed Load due to Self weight ( S.W.) of Stack Head :

WDL s-h = 1.10 ( Ua As-h )
= 78.16 N/m
Date: May 11, 2020
IX. DESIGN MOMENT AND SHEAR:
2
Maximum Design Moment, Mmax ( x - x ) = WDL s-s Lb + Pg a
( for Uniform Load & Two equidistant Point Load ) 8
= 66114.76 N-mm
Maximum Design Shear, Vmax = WDL s-s Lb + Pg

2
= 188.90 N
Maximum Design Moment, Mmax ( x - x ) = WDL s-h Lb2

8
= 19148.25 N-mm
Maximum Design Shear, Vmax = WDL s-h Lb

2
= 54.71 N
X. CHECK MAXIMUM DEFLECTION DUE TO DEAD LOAD:
Allow. Deflection @ Mid., δallow = 3.00 mm
Maximum Deflection, δmax = 5 WDL s-s Lb4 Pg a (3Lb2 - 4a2)

+
= 384 Ea Ixs-s 24 Ea Ixs-s
= 0.22 mm
Since δmax < δallow Therefore, stack sill is SAFE on deflection parallel to glass.
Allow. Deflection @ Mid., δallow = 3.00 mm
Maximum Deflection, δmax = 5 WDL s-h Lb4

384 Ea Ixs-h
= 0.02 mm
Since δmax < δallow Therefore, stack head is SAFE on deflection parallel to glass.
XI. CHECK BENDING STRESSES PER ALUMINUM DESIGN MANUAL :

11.1 Member : Stack Sill


= 103.43 MPa
Date: May 11, 2020


= 32.67
S1 < S < S2
Lateral Buckling Check, Fb1 = 19.0 - 0.17 b/t
= 13.45 ksi
= 92.71 MPa


= 15.07
S1 > S < S2
= 137.90 MPa
Allow. Bending Stress Parallell to Glass, Fbx = 92.71 MPa
Actual Bending Stress Parallell to Glass, fbx = Mmax cys-s

Ixs-s
= 2.86 MPa
Since fbx < Fbx Therefore, stack sill is SAFE on bending Stress parallel to glass.

= 103.43 MPa
Date: May 11, 2020


= 57.00
S1 < S > S2
Lateral Buckling Check, Fb1 = 484 / b/t
= 8.49 ksi
= 58.55 MPa
Sec. 3.4.17 Compression Component in Beam, "Fb2" :

(element in bending in own plane: Flat elements supported on tension edge, compression edge free)

= 16.75
S1 > S < S2
= 137.90 MPa


= 11.70
S1 > S < S2
= 137.90 MPa
Allow. Bending Stress Normal to Glass, Fbx = 58.55 MPa

Actual Bending Stress Normal to Glass, fbx = Mmax cys-h
Ixs-h
= 0.53 MPa
Since fbx < Fbx Therefore, stack head is SAFE on bending stress parallel to glass.
Date: May 11, 2020
XII. CHECK SHEAR IN ELEMENT:
Sec 3.4.20 Shear in Elements, fsy

(gross section, unstiffened flat elements supported on both edges)

= 32.67
S1 > S < S2
Allowable Shear Normal to Glass, Fsy = 8.50 ksi
= 58.61 MPa
Actual Shear Normal to Glass, fsy = Vmax

As-s
= 3.22 MPa
Since fsy < Fsy Therefore, stack sill is SAFE on shear stress normal to glass.
Sec 3.4.20 Shear in Elements, fsx


= 15.07
S1 > S < S2
= 58.61 MPa

As-s
= 0.11 MPa
Since fsx < Fsx Therefore, stack sill is SAFE on shear stress parallel to glass.
Date: May 11, 2020
Sec 3.4.20 Shear in Elements, fsy


= 57.00
S1 < S < S2
Allowable Shear Normal to Glass, Fsy = 11.0 - 0.059 S
= 7.64 ksi
= 52.66 MPa
Actual Shear Normal to Glass, fsy = Vmax

As-s
= 2.03 MPa
Since fsy < Fsy Therefore, stack head is SAFE on shear stress normal to glass.
Sec 3.4.20 Shear in Elements, fsx


= 11.70
S1 > S < S2
= 58.61 MPa

As-s
= 0.02 MPa
Since fsx < Fsx Therefore, stack head is SAFE on shear stress parallel to glass.
Date: May 11, 2020
XIII. CHECK UNDER COMBINED BENDING AND SHEAR STRESS RATIO (CSR):

2 2
fby fbx fsy fsx
+ + 2 + 2 = 0.13
Fby Fbx Fsy Fsx
Since CSR < 1.00 Therefore, stack sill is ADEQUATE.

fby fbx fsy2 fsx2

+ + + = 0.12
Fby Fbx Fsy2 Fsx2
Since CSR < 1.00 Therefore, stack head is ADEQUATE.
Item: Analysis of Stack Joint Element @ Hotspot Condition (-6.75kPa)
Date: May 11, 2020
Neg. Wind Load Reaction at Support, WWL = 17600.00 N

Refer Table 1.0, Staad Beam End Forces Report, Beam 10, Node 11
Factor of Safety for Brackets, FSb = 1.00
Design Wind Load Reaction at Support, -RWL = FS WWL
= 17600.00 N
Ultimate Yield Strength (6061-T6 Extrusion), Ftu1 = 28.00 ksi
= 193.06 MPa
Ultimate Shear Strength (6061-T6 Extrusion), Fsu1 = 12.00 ksi
= 82.74 MPa
Ultimate Yield Strength (6063-T6 Extrusion), Ftu2 = 20.00 ksi
= 137.90 MPa
Ultimate Shear Strength (6063-T6 Extrusion), Fsu2 = 8.50 ksi
= 58.61 MPa
Table 1.0 Staad Beam End Forces Report
V.C Stack Head 1/4
Date: May 11, 2020
Figure 1.0 Sleeve Analysis at Negative Windload
-RWL
Inner Sleeve
x x
Element of Aluminum Header
2.1 Aluminum Inner Sleeve
Length of Bracket, Lbracket = 550.00 mm

Thickness of Bracket, tbracket = 6.50 mm
2
Cross Sectional Area, Abracket = 3575.00 mm
3
Moment of Inertia, Ix_bracket = Lbracket tbracket
12
4
= 12586.98 mm
Axis of twist, cy_bracket = tbracket / 2 mm
= 3.25 mm
2.2 Element of Aluminum Stack Head
Length of Element, Lheader = 550.00 mm

Thickness of Element, theader = 4.80 mm
2
Cross Sectional Area, Aheader = 2640.00 mm
Moment of Inertia, Ix_header = Lheader theader3
12
4
= 5068.80 mm
Axis of twist, cy_header = theader / 2 mm
= 2.40 mm
2.3 Maximum Design Moment
ΣMo = 0
Maximum Design Moment, Mmax = 51.7 (-RWL)
= 909920.00 Nmm
III. ANALYSIS OF INNER SLEEVE:
3.1 Local Bending Stress
Max. Design Moment, Mb = Mmax Ix_bracket

Ix_bracket + Ix_header
= 648690.95 Nmm
V.C Stack Head 2/4
Date: May 11, 2020
Actual Bending Stress, fb = Mb cy_bracket

Ix_bracket
= 167.49 MPa
Allowable Bending Stress, Fb = Ftu1

= 193.06 MPa
Since fb < Fb Therefore, Gutter sleeve is SAFE on bending stress.
3.2 Local Shearing Stress
Max. Design Reactions, Rb = -RWL Abracket

Abracket + Aheader
= 10123.89 N
Actual Shearing Stress, fv = Rb

Abracket
= 2.83 MPa
Allowable Shearing Stress, Fv = Fsu1

= 82.74 MPa
Since fv < Fv Therefore, Gutter sleeve is SAFE on shear stress.
3.3 Combined Shear and Bending Stress Ratio
Actual Bending Stress, fb = 167.49 MPa

Actual Shearing Stress, fv = 2.83 MPa
Allowable Bending Stress, Fb = 193.06 MPa
Allowable Shearing Stress, Fv = 82.74 MPa
fb fv2
+ = 0.87
Fb Fv2
Since CSR < 1.00 Therefore, Gutter sleeve is ADEQUATE.
IV. ANALYSIS OF LEG OF STACK HEAD TRANSOM:
Max. Design Moment, Mb = Mmax Ix_header

Ix_bracket + Ix_header
= 261229.05 N-mm
Actual Bending Stress, fb = Mb cy_header

Ix_header
= 123.69 MPa
Allowable Bending Stress, Fb = Ftu2

= 137.90 MPa
Since fb < Fb Therefore, leg of stack head transom SAFE on bending Sstress.
V.C Stack Head 3/4
Date: May 11, 2020
Max. Design Reactions, Rb = RWL Aheader

Abracket + Aheader
= 7476.11 N
Actual Shearing Stress, fv = Rb

Aheader
= 2.83 MPa
Allowable Shearing Stress, Fv = Fsu2

= 58.61 MPa
Since fv < Fv Therefore, leg of stack head transom is SAFE on shear stress.
4.3 Combined Shear and Bending Stress Ratio

fb fv2
+ = 0.90
Fb Fv2
Since CSR < 1.00 Therefore, leg of stack head transom is ADEQUATE.
V.C Stack Head 4/4
VI. ANALYSIS OF TRANSOM TO MULLION CONNECTION
NU STAR CEBU

Item: Analysis of Screw Connection at Intermediate Transom
Date: May 11, 2020
• FIG.1.1: Section Detail of Vision Transom to Mullion Connection.
Pg
T1
T2
Max. Design Wind Pressure, wp = 6.75 kPa

Concentrated Load from glass @ L/4, Pg = 178.542 N V.A Transom 5/7
Unbraced Length of Transom, Lb = 1400.00 mm V.A Transom 1/7
Equivalent Uniformly Dist. Wind Load, WWL = 7762.500 N/m V.A Transom 3/7
Self Weight of Transom & Accessories, WDL = 62.643 N/m V.A Transom 5/7
Horizontal Reaction due to Dead load, RDL = WDL Lb
(Weight of Section & Accessories) = 87.70 N
Tributary Height of Upper Panel, th1 = 650.00 mm V.A Transom 1/7
Tributary Height of Bottom Panel, th2 = 500.00 mm V.A Transom 1/7
= 1150.00 mm
Quantity of Screws, n = 6.00 pcs
II. CHECK LOADINGS DUE TO WIND LOAD:
Horizontal Reaction at Upper Mullion, T1 = wp th1 Lb

2
= 3071.25 N
Horizontal Reaction at Lower Mullion, T2 = wp th2 Lb

2
= 2362.50 N
III. LOCATE FOR CENTROID OF BOLT GROUP:
Assumed Value, 2 AAREA = 2 BAREA = 2 CAREA

= 1.00 mm2
2
Total Area of Screws, ATOTAL = 6.00 mm
VI.A Screw 1/5
Date: May 11, 2020
Horizontal Distance from Bolt Center to Center of Screw Group :

x = 2AAREA (0) + 2BAREA (84) + 2CAREA (134)
(ATOTAL / 2)
x = 72.67 mm
Vertical Distance from Bolt Center to Center of Screw Group :

y = 2AAREA (0) + 2BAREA (86) + 2CAREA (87)
(ATOTAL / 2)
y = 57.67 mm
IV. CHECK ALLOWABLE SHEAR & BEARING AS PER ALUMINUM DESIGN MANUAL:
4.1 Required Shear & Bearing Strength of Screw
Moment at Point O, ΣMo = 114.7Pg + 16.8T1 - 44.2T2

= 32346.73 N-mm
Sum. of x & y Dist. of Screws, Σ(x2 + y2) = 34423.556 mm2
Shear Reaction along Y-axis / Screw, RyBOLT = ΣMo x Pg

2 2 +
Σ(x + y ) n
= 98.04 N
Shear Reaction along x-axis / Screw, RxBOLT = ΣMo y RWL

2 2 +
Σ(x + y ) n
= 566.06 N
Maximum Design Shear Per Screw, Vmax = [(RxBOLT)2 + (RyBOLT)2]1/2

= 574.49 N
4.2 Clause 5.4.3.1 Allowable Shear for member in contact with the screw head
Nominal Screw Diameter, D = 0.216 in

Ultimate Tensile Strength of 6063-T6 Alloy, Ftu1 = 30.00 ksi
Factor of safety on ultimate strength, nu = 1.95
Thk. of Member in contact w/ screw head, t1 = 3.00 mm
= 0.12 in
Allowable Shear force, Vallow = 2 Ftu1 D t1 / nu Eq. 5.4.3-1
= 0.78 kips
= 3491.59 N
Since Vallow > Vmax Therefore, screw is SAFE on shear strength.
4.3 Clause 5.4.3.2 Allowable Shear for member not in contact with the screw head

Thickness of member not in contact w/ screw = 3.00 mm
head, t2 = 0.12 in
= 0.78 kips
= 3491.59 N
VI.A Screw 2/5
Date: May 11, 2020
4.4 Clause 5.4.3.4 Allowable Shear Strength of screw
Safety Factor of Screw, ns = 3.00

Min. Tensile Yield Strength, Fy = 65.00 ksi
( Appendices: AAMA TIR A9-91, Table 11 ) = 448.24 MPa
Thread Root Area, A(R) = 0.0214 in2
2
( Appendices: AAMA TIR A9-91, Table 11 ) = 13.81 mm
Nominal shear Strength of Screw, Pns = Fy A(R)
= 6188.53 N
Allowable Shear force from AAMA, Vallow = Pns / (1.25 ns) Eq. 5.4.3-4
= 1650.27 N
4.5 ADM Table 2-24 Sec 3.4.6 : Bearing on flat surfaces, 6063 – T6
Threaded Screw Diameter, dts = 5.50 mm

Min. Thickness of Member Joined by Screw, tm = 3.00 mm
Projected Area, Ap = dts tm
= 16.50
Actual Bearing Stress on Bolts, fp = Vmax / (n Ap)

= 5.80 MPa
Allowable Bearing Stress on Bolts, Fp = 31.00 ksi

= 213.75 MPa
Since Fp > fp Therefore, aluminum plate is SAFE on bearing stress.
V. CHECK ALLOWABLE TENSION AS PER ALUMINUM DESIGN MANUAL:
• FIG.2 : Plan Detail of Vision Transom to Mullion Connection.
nPU
No. 12 X 38L
PHSTS
T1 + T2 + Pg + RDL
VI.A Screw 3/5
Date: May 11, 2020
5.1 Required Tensile Strength of Screw
Moment @ Point O, ΣMo = 0
Tensile Force Load of Screw Group, nPu = 19 (T1 + T2 + Pg + RDL)

134
= 808.21 N
Maximum Tensile Force Load / Screw, Pu = 134.70 N
5.2 Clause 5.4.2.1 Allowable Pullout for UNC Threads Screw

Yield Tensile Strength of 6063-T6 Alloy, Fty2 = 25 ksi
Safety Factor of Screw, ns = 3
Depth of Full thread engagement to Transom, tc = 3 mm
= 0.118 in
1.50 mm < tc > 3.00 mm
Screw Coefficient for tc < 3mm, Ks = 1.2
Nominal Pull-Out Strength of Screw, Pnot = Ks tc D Fty2 Eq. 5.4.2.1-1
= 0.765 kips
Allow. Pull-Out Strength From ADM, Pallow = Pnot / ns
= 1134.765 N
Since Pallow > Pu Therefore, screw is SAFE on pull-out strength.
5.3 Clause 5.4.2.2 Allowable Pullover for Pan Head Screw
Larger screw head Diameter, Dws = 0.425 in

Nominal Hole Diameter, Dh = 0.216 in
Screw Coefficient for valley fastening, C = 1.00
Thickness of Mullion in contact w/ screw head, t1 = 3.00 mm
= 0.118 in
Nominal Pull-Over Strength of Screw, Pnov = C t1 Ftu1 (Dws – Dh) Eq. 5.4.2.2-1
= 0.74 kips
Allow. Pull-Over Strength From ADM, Pallow = Pnov / ns
= 1099.02 N
Since Pallow > Pu Therefore, screw is SAFE on pull-over strength.
5.4 Clause 5.4.2 Allowable Tensile Strength of Screw

Ultimate Tensile Strength of Screw, Fu = 110.00 ksi
(Appendices: AAMA TIR A9-91, Table 11) = 757.90 MPa
Tensile Stress Area, A (S) = 0.0242 in2
2
= 15.61 mm
Allowable Tension of Screw, Pnt = 0.40 Fu A(S)
= 4733.20 N
Allow. Tensile Strength From AAMA, Pallow = Pnt / (1.25ns)
= 1262.19 N
Since Pallow > Pu Therefore, screw is SAFE on tensile strength.
VI.A Screw 4/5
Date: May 11, 2020
VI. CHECK COMBINED TENSILE & SHEAR STRESS :
Maximum Design Shear Per Screw , Vmax = 574.49 N

Allowable Shear force from AAMA, Vallow = 1650.27 N
Allow. Pull-Over Strength From ADM, Pallow = 1099.02 N
2 2
Vmax Pu
2 + 2 = 0.14
Vallow Pallow
Since CSR < 1.00 Therefore, screw is ADEQUATE.
VI.A Screw 5/5
Item: Analysis of Screw Connection at Sill Stack Joint
Date: May 11, 2020
• FIG.1.1 : Section Detail of Sill Stack Joint Connection.
Pg
T1

Concentrated Load from glass @ L/4, Pg = 154.508 N V.B Stack Joint 8/14
Unbraced Length of Transom, Lb = 1400.00 mm V.B Stack Joint 1/14
Equivalent Uniformly Dist. Wind Load, WWL = 7762.500 N/m V.B Stack Joint 5/14
Self Weight of Transom & Accessories, WDL = 49.131 N/m V.B Stack Joint 8/14

Tributary Height of Upper Panel, th1 = 500.00 mm V.B Stack Joint 1/14
Tributary Height of Bottom Panel, th2 = 650.00 mm V.B Stack Joint 1/14

= 1150.00 mm
Quantity of Screws, n = 5.00 pc/s.
Horizontal Reaction at Upper Mullion, T1 = wp th1 Lb

2
= 2362.50 N

2
= 1.00 mm
2

x = AAREA (0) + 2BAREA (84) + 2CAREA (134)
(ATOTAL / 2)
x = 87.20 mm
VI.B Screw 1/5
Date: May 11, 2020

y = 3BAREA (43.2)
ATOTAL
y = 25.92 mm
Moment at Point O, ΣMo = 131.2Pg + 16.4 T1

= 59016.38 N-mm
Sum. of x & y Dist. of Screws, Σ(x2 + y2) = 33102.746 mm

2
Shear Reaction along Y-axis / Screw, RyBOLT = ΣMo x Pg

2 2 +
Σ(x + y ) n
= 186.36 N
Shear Reaction along x-axis / Screw, RxBOLT = ΣMo y T1

2 2 +
Σ(x + y ) n
= 518.71 N

= 551.17 N

= 0.12 in
= 0.78 kips
= 3491.59 N

Ultimate Tensile Strength of 6063-T6 Alloy, Ftu2= 30.00 ksi
Thickness of member not in contact w/ screw head, t2
= 3.00 mm
= 0.12 in
= 0.78 kips
= 3491.59 N
VI.B Screw 2/5
Date: May 11, 2020

2
= 6188.53 N
= 1650.27 N

= 16.50

= 6.68 MPa

= 213.75 MPa
• FIG.2 : Plan Detail of Stack Joint Connection.
No. 12 X 38L
PHSTS nPU
T1 + Pg + RDL
VI.B Screw 3/5
Date: May 11, 2020
Tensile Force Load of Screw Group, nPu = 16.5(T1 + Pg + RDL)

106.00
= 402.51 N

= 0.118 in
1.50 mm < tc > 3 mm
= 0.765 kips
= 1134.765 N
Since Pallow > Pu Therefore, screw is SAFE on pull-out Strength.

Ultimate Tensile Strength of 6063-T6 Alloy, Ftu1
= 30.00 ksi
= 0.118 in
= 0.74 kips
= 1099.02 N

2
Tensile Stress Area, A (S) = 0.0242 in
2
= 15.61 mm
= 4733.20 N
= 1262.19 N
VI.B Screw 4/5
Date: May 11, 2020
Maximum Design Shear Per Screw, Vmax = 551.17 N

2 2
Vmax Pu
2 + 2 = 0.12
Vallow Pallow
VI.B Screw 5/5
Item: Analysis of Screw Connection at Head Stack Joint
Date: May 11, 2020
• FIG.1.1 : Section Detail of Head Stack Joint Connection.
No. 12 X 38L PHSTS
T2

Unbraced Length of Transom, Lb = 1400.00 mm V.B Stack Joint 1/14
Equivalent Uniformly Dist. Wind Load, WWL = 7762.500 N/m V.B Stack Joint 5/14
Self Weight of Stack Head & Accessories, WDL = 49.131 N/m V.B Stack Joint 8/14

Tributary Height of Upper Panel, th1 = 500.00 mm V.B Stack Joint 1/14
Tributary Height of Bottom Panel, th2 = 650.00 mm V.B Stack Joint 1/14

= 1150.00 mm
Quantity of Screws, n = 6.00 pcs
Horizontal Reaction at Lower Mullion, T2 = wp th2 Lb

2
= 3071.25 N

2
= 1.00 mm
2

x = 2AAREA (0) + 2BAREA (84) + 2CAREA (134)
(ATOTAL / 2)
x = 72.67 mm
VI.C Screw 1 / 5
Date: May 11, 2020

y = 2AAREA (0) + 2BAREA (27.7)
2AAREA + 2BAREA
y = 13.85 mm
Moment at Point O, ΣMo = 2.3 T2

= 46068.75 N-mm
Sum. of x & y Dist. of Screws, Σ(x2 + y2) = 21889.068 mm

2
Shear Reaction along Y-axis / Screw, RyBOLT = ΣMo x

Σ(x2 + y2)
= 152.94 N
Shear Reaction along x-axis / Screw, RxBOLT = ΣMo y T2

2 2 +
Σ(x + y ) n
= 541.02 N

= 562.23 N

= 0.12 in
= 0.78 kips
= 3491.59 N

Thickness of Transom not in contact w/ screw head, t2
= 3.00 mm
= 0.12 in
= 0.78 kips
= 3491.59 N
VI.C Screw 2 / 5
Date: May 11, 2020

2
= 6188.53 N
= 1650.27 N

= 16.50

= 5.68 MPa

= 213.75 MPa
• FIG.2 : Plan Detail of Stack Joint Connection.
No. 12 X 38L
PHSTS nPU
T2 + RDL
VI.C Screw 3 / 5
Date: May 11, 2020
Tensile Force Load of Screw Group, nPu = 19.5 (T2 + RDL)

106.00
= 577.65 N

= 0.118 in
1.50 mm < tc > 3 mm
= 0.765 kips
= 1134.765 N
Since Pallow > Pu Therefore, screw is SAFE onpull-out strength.

Ultimate Tensile Strength of 6063-T6 Alloy, Ftu1
= 30.00 ksi
= 0.118 in
= 0.74 kips
= 1099.02 N

2
Tensile Stress Area, A (S) = 0.0242 in
2
= 15.61 mm
= 4733.20 N
= 1262.19 N
VI.C Screw 4 / 5
Date: May 11, 2020

Allow. Pull-Over Strength from AAMA, Pallow = 1099.02 N
2 2
Vmax Pu
2 + 2 = 0.12
Vallow Pallow
VI.C Screw 5 / 5
VII. ANALYSIS OF BRACKETS, BOLTS AND ANCHORS
NU STAR CEBU

Item: Load Reaction at Support
Date: May 11, 2020
• FIG. 1.0 : Partial Elevation of Curtain Wall System (Refer to Drawing No. APP-PE01)
TRIBUTARY WIDTH
Negative Design Wind Pressure @ Hotspot, = 6.75 kPa

-wpH
Negative Design Wind Pressure @ Non- = 4.25 kPa
Hotspot, -wpNH
Negative Wind Load Reaction @ Hotspot, - = 45200.00 N
WLH
Refer to Fig.2.0-c or Table 2.0, Negative Windload, Node 10
Negative Wind Load Reaction @ = 30900.00 N
Non-Hotspot, -WLNH
Refer to Fig.2.0-c or Table 2.1, Negative Windload, Node 10
Dead Load Reaction, RDL = 3292.23 N IV.A Mullion 13/15
Factor of Safety for Brackets, FSb = 1.00
Factor of Safety for Anchors, FSa = 1.30
Overload Factor for Anchors, OFa = 1.33
VII.A Reaction 1/4
Date: May 11, 2020
II. LOAD REACTIONS FOR BRACKETS:
2.1 Reaction due to Negative Wind Load (Hotspot)

Negative Wind Load Reaction at Support = FSb -WLH
(Hotspot), -RWL-H = 45200.00 N
2.2 Reaction due to Negative Wind Load (Non-Hotspot)

Negative Wind Load Reaction at Support = FSb -WLNH
(Non-Hotspot), -RWL-NH = 30900.00 N
2.3 Reaction due to Dead load

Dead Load Reaction, DL = FSb RDL
= 3292.23 N
III. LOAD REACTIONS FOR ANCHORS:
3.1 Reaction due to Negative Wind Load (Hotspot)

Negative Wind Load Reaction at Support = OFa FSa -WLH
(Hotspot), -RWL-H = 78150.80 N
3.2 Reaction due to Negative Wind Load (Non-Hotspot)

Negative Wind Load Reaction at Support = OFa FSa -WLNH
(Non-Hotspot), -RWL-NH = 53426.10 N
3.3 Reaction due to Dead load

Dead Load Reaction, DL = OFa FSa RDL
= 5692.27 N
Figure 2.0 Staad Load Reactions at Support (Hotspot Condition)
a. Negative Wind Load Reaction @ Hotspot Condition
VII.A Reaction 2/4
Date: May 11, 2020
Figure 2.1 Staad Load Reactions at Support (Non-Hotspot Condition)
a. Negative Wind Load Reaction @ Hotspot Condition
Table 2.0 Staad Load Reaction Report @ Hotspot Condition
VII.A Reaction 3/4
Date: May 11, 2020
Table 2.1 Staad Load Reaction Report @ Non-Hotspot Condition
VII.A Reaction 4/4
Item: Analysis of Hook Bracket @ Hotspot Condition (-6.75kPa)
Date: May 11, 2020
I. Design Parameters
Negative Wind Load Reaction, RWL1 = 45200.00 N

Refer to VII.A Reaction 2/4
Design Dead Load Reaction, RDL = 3292.23 N
Allowable Tensile Strength of Element, Ft = 28.00 ksi
Refer to Fig. 1.1: ADM 2005 Allowable Stress = 193.06 MPa
Allowable Shear Strength of Element, Fs = 12.00 ksi
Fig. 1.1: ADM 2005 Allowable Stress for 6061-T6 Alloy & Temper Extrusions
VII.B1 Hook Bracket 1/5
Date: May 11, 2020
II. Analysis of Aluminum Hook Bracket @ Section a-a
• FIG. 2.1 : Connection Detail of Hook Bracket to Mullion

Refer to Drawing No. CIR-DT03
RDL HOOK BRACKET

a
RWL
2.1 Section Properties at a-a
Length of Bracket at Section a-a, Lbracket = 175.00 mm

Diameter of Bolt, dbolt = 12.00 mm
Net Length of Bracket at Section a-a, Lnet = Lbracket - 3dbolt
139.00 mm
Thickness of Bracket at Section a-a, tbracket = 10.00 mm
2
Cross Sectional Area at Section a-a, Abracket = 1390.00 mm
2.2 Local Tensile Stress
Tension Load at Section a-a, Rt = RWL1 / 2

= 22600.00 N
Actual Tensile Stress, ft = Rt

Abracket
= 16.26 MPa
Allowable Tensile Stress, Ft = Ft

= 193.06 MPa
Since ft < Ft Therefore, hook bracket is SAFE on bending stress.
Date: May 11, 2020
Shear Load Reaction, Rv = RDL / 2

= 1646.12 N
Actual Shearing Stress, fv = Rv

Abracket
= 1.18 MPa
Allowable Shearing Stress, Fv = Fs

= 82.74 MPa
Since fv < Fv Therefore, hook bracket is SAFE on shearing stress.
2.4 Combined Tension and Shear Stress Ratio
Actual Tensile Stress, ft = 16.26 MPa

Allowable Tensile Stress, Ft = 193.06 MPa
2
ft fv
+ 2 = 0.08
Ft Fv
Since CSR < 1.00 Therefore, hook bracket is ADEQUATE at section a-a.
III. ANALYSIS OF b-b SECTION OF ALUMINUM HOOK BRACKET:

HOOK BRACKET
b
RDL
RWL
Date: May 11, 2020
3.1 Section Properties at b-b
Length of Bracket at Section b-b, Lbracket = 40.00 mm

Thickness of Bracket at Section b-b, tbracket = 16.70 mm
2
Cross Sectional Area at Section b-b, Abracket = 668.00 mm
Moment of Inertia at Section b-b, Ix = tbracket Lbracket3
12
4
= 89066.67 mm
Distance from N.A. to Extreme Fiber, cy = Lbracket / 2
= 20.00 mm
Load Eccentricity, e = 28.50 mm
Design Local Moment, Mb = RWL1 e

2
= 644100.00 Nmm
Actual Bending Stress, fb = Mb cy

Ix_bracket
= 144.63 MPa
Allowable Bending Stress, Fb = Ft

= 193.06 MPa
Since fb < Fb Therefore, hook bracket is SAFE on bending stress.

= 1646.12 N

Abracket
= 2.46 MPa

= 82.74 MPa
3.4 Combined Bending and Shear Stress Ratio

ft fv2
+ = 0.75
Ft Fv2
Since CSR < 1.00 Therefore, hook bracket is ADEQUATE at section b-b.
Date: May 11, 2020
IV. ANALYSIS OF c-c SECTION OF ALUMINUM HOOK BRACKET:

c c
RWL
4.1 Section Properties at c-c
Length of Bracket at Section c-c, Lbracket = 16.00 mm

Thickness of Bracket at Section c-c, tbracket = 17.50 mm
2
Cross Sectional Area at Section c-c, Abracket = 280.00 mm
Shear Load Reaction, Rv = RWL1 / 2

= 22600.00 N

Abracket
= 80.71 MPa

= 82.74 MPa
Item: Analysis of Hook Bracket @ Non-Hotspot Condition (-4.25kPa)
Date: May 11, 2020
Negative Wind Load Reaction, RWL1 = 30900.00 N

Date: May 11, 2020
II. Analysis of Aluminum Hook Bracket @ Section a-a

RDL HOOK BRACKET

a
RWL
2.1 Section Properties at a-a

Net Length of Bracket at Section a-a, Lnet = Lbracket - 3dbolt
139.00 mm
2
2.2 Local Tensile Stress
Tension Load at Section a-a, Rt = RWL1 / 2

= 15450.00 N
Actual Tensile Stress, ft = Rt

Abracket
= 11.12 MPa
Allowable Tensile Stress, Ft = Ft

= 193.06 MPa
Since ft < Ft Therefore, hook bracket is SAFE on bending stress.
Date: May 11, 2020

= 1646.12 N

Abracket
= 1.18 MPa

= 82.74 MPa
2.4 Combined Tension and Shear Stress Ratio
Actual Tensile Stress, ft = 11.12 MPa

Allowable Tensile Stress, Ft = 193.06 MPa
2
ft fv
+ 2 = 0.06
Ft Fv
Since CSR < 1.00 Therefore, hook bracket is ADEQUATE at section a-a.
III. ANALYSIS OF b-b SECTION OF ALUMINUM HOOK BRACKET:

HOOK BRACKET
b
RDL
RWL
Date: May 11, 2020
3.1 Section Properties at b-b

2
Moment of Inertia at Section b-b, Ix = tbracket Lbracket3
12
4
= 89066.67 mm
Distance from N.A. to Extreme Fiber, cy = Lbracket / 2
= 20.00 mm
Load Eccentricity, e = 28.50 mm
Design Local Moment, Mb = RWL1 e

2
= 440325.00 Nmm
Actual Bending Stress, fb = Mb cy

Ix_bracket
= 98.88 MPa

= 193.06 MPa
Since fb < Fb Therefore, hook bracket is SAFE on bending stress.

= 1646.12 N

Abracket
= 2.46 MPa

= 82.74 MPa

ft fv2
+ = 0.51
Ft Fv2
Since CSR < 1.00 Therefore, hook bracket is ADEQUATE at section b-b.
Date: May 11, 2020
IV. ANALYSIS OF c-c SECTION OF ALUMINUM HOOK BRACKET:

c c
RWL
4.1 Section Properties at c-c
Length of Bracket at Section c-c, Lbracket = 16.00 mm

Thickness of Bracket at Section c-c, tbracket = 17.50 mm
2
Cross Sectional Area at Section c-c, Abracket = 280.00 mm
Shear Load Reaction, Rv = RWL1 / 2

= 15450.00 N

Abracket
= 55.18 MPa

= 82.74 MPa
Item: Analysis of Typical Primary Bracket @ Hotspot Condition (-6.75kPa)
Date: May 11, 2020
Negative Wind Load Reaction, RWL = 45200.00 N

Refer to Fig.1.1: ADM 2005 Allowable Stress for 6061-T6 = 193.06 MPa
VII.C1 Primary Bracket 1/4
Date: May 11, 2020
II. Analysis of Aluminum Primary Bracket @ Section a-a
• FIG. 2.1 : Section Detail of Primary Bracket

RDL
a
RWL
a
2.1 Section Properties of Bracket at a - a Section

2
3
Moment of Inertia, Iy = Lbracket tbracket
12
4
= 202168.27 mm
Distance from N.A. to Extreme Fiber, cx = tbracket / 2 mm
= 8.20 mm
In-Out Tolerance, e = 30.00 mm
2.2 Actual Local Bending Stress Considering a - a Section
ΣM o = 0
Design Moment of Primary Bracket at = -45.6 RWL + (66.1+e) RDL
Section a-a, M = 1744736.70 Nmm
Actual Bending Stress, fb = M cx

Iy
= 70.77 MPa

= 193.06 MPa
Since fb < Fb Therefore, primary bracket is SAFE on bending stress.
Date: May 11, 2020
2.3 Actual Local Shearing Stress Considering a - a Section
Actual Shearing Stress, fv = RDL

Abracket
= 0.36 MPa

= 82.74 MPa
Since fv < Fv Therefore, primary bracket is SAFE on shear stress.
2.4 Combined Bending and Stress Stress Ratio

fb fv2
+ = 0.37
Fb Fv2
Since CSR < 1.00 Therefore, primary bracket is ADEQUATE at section a-a.
III. Analysis of Aluminum Primary Bracket @ Section b-b

RDL b
RWL
3.1 Section Properties of Bracket at b - b Section

Net Length of Bracket at Section b-b, Lnet = Lbracket - 2dbolt
518.00 mm
2
3
Moment of Inertia, Iy = Lbracket ( tbracket )
12
4
= 110279.77 mm
Date: May 11, 2020

= 6.70 mm
IN-OUT Tolerance, e1 = 30.00 mm
3.2 Actual Local Bending Stress Considering b - b Section
ΣM o = 0
Design Moment for Vertical Leg of Primary Bracket, = -44.1RWL + (191.1 + e1) RDL
M = 1265407.95 N-mm

Iy
= 76.88 MPa

= 193.06 MPa
3.3 Actual Shearing Stress Considering b - b Section
Actual Shearing Stress, fv = RWL

Abracket
= 6.51 MPa
Allowable Shearing Stress, Fv = Fsu

= 82.74 MPa

2
fb fv
+ = 0.40
Fb Fv2
Since CSR < 1.00 Therefore, primary bracket is ADEQUATE at section b-b.
Item: Analysis of Typical Primary Bracket @ Non-Hotspot Condition (-4.25kPa)
Date: May 11, 2020
Negative Wind Load Reaction, RWL = 30900.00 N

Date: May 11, 2020
II. Analysis of Aluminum Primary Bracket @ Section a-a

RDL
a
RWL
a
2.1 Section Properties of Bracket at a - a Section

2
3
Moment of Inertia, Iy = Lbracket tbracket
12
4
= 147031.47 mm
= 8.20 mm
In-Out Tolerance, e = 30.00 mm
2.2 Actual Local Bending Stress Considering a - a Section
ΣM o = 0
Design Moment of Primary Bracket at = -45.6 RWL + (66.1+e) RDL
Section a-a, M = 1092656.70 Nmm

Iy
= 60.94 MPa

= 193.06 MPa
Date: May 11, 2020
2.3 Actual Local Shearing Stress Considering a - a Section
Actual Shearing Stress, fv = RDL

Abracket
= 0.50 MPa

= 82.74 MPa
2.4 Combined Bending and Stress Stress Ratio

fb fv2
+ = 0.32
Fb Fv2
Since CSR < 1.00 Therefore, primary bracket is ADEQUATE at section a-a.
III. Analysis of Aluminum Primary Bracket @ Section b-b

RDL b
RWL
3.1 Section Properties of Bracket at b - b Section

Net Length of Bracket at Section b-b, Lnet = Lbracket - 2dbolt
368.00 mm
2
3
Moment of Inertia, Iy = Lbracket ( tbracket )
12
4
= 80203.47 mm
Date: May 11, 2020

= 6.70 mm
IN-OUT Tolerance, e1 = 30.00 mm
3.2 Actual Local Bending Stress Considering b - b Section
ΣM o = 0
Design Moment for Vertical Leg of Primary Bracket, = -44.1RWL + (191.1 + e1) RDL
M = 634777.95 N-mm

Iy
= 53.03 MPa

= 193.06 MPa
3.3 Actual Shearing Stress Considering b - b Section
Actual Shearing Stress, fv = RWL

Abracket
= 6.27 MPa
Allowable Shearing Stress, Fv = Fsu

= 82.74 MPa

2
fb fv
+ = 0.28
Fb Fv2
Since CSR < 1.00 Therefore, primary bracket is ADEQUATE at section b-b.
Item: Analysis of Bolts and Screw @ Hotspot Condition (-6.75kPa)
Date: May 11, 2020
I. Load Reactions
Negative Wind Load Reaction, RWL = 45200.00 N VII.A Reaction 2/4

Design Dead Load Reaction, RDL = 3292.23 N VII.A Reaction 2/4
II. Adequacy Check of M12 Hex. Head Machine Bolt
• FIG. 2.1 : Plan and Section of Connection of Hook Bracket (Refer to Drawing No. CIR-DT03)
M12 HHMB RDL
RWL
a) Plan View b) Section View
2.1 Design Criteria

Quantity of Bolt, nb = 6.00 pc/s.
2.2 Checking Shear Capacity of Bolt
(RWL + RDL )1/2

2 2
Total Shear Load, Rv =
= 45319.74 N
Design Reaction per Machine Bolt, fv = Rv

nb
= 7553.29 N
Shear (Single) Strength of M12 Bolt, Fv = 2219 lbs

Refer to Fig. 3.1; AAMA-TIR-A9-91, Table 11 = 9870.11 N
Since Fv > fv Therefore, M12 HHMB is SAFE on shear strength.
2.3 Checking Bearing Capacity of Material
Thickness of Mullion Member, tm = 3.00 mm

Thickness of Bearing Plate Member, tb = 4.00 mm
Cross-sectional Area of Bearing , Ap = tb dbolt
= 48.00 mm2
Allowable Bearing Stress, Fp = 31.00 ksi

Refer to Fig. 3.2: ADM 2005 Allowable Stress fo 6063-T6 = 213.75 MPa
Actual Bearing per Bolt on Muliion, fp = fv

Ap
= 157.36 MPa
Since Fp > fp Therefore, material is SAFE on bearing stress.
VII.D1 Bolts and Screw 1/3
Date: May 11, 2020
III. Adequacy Check of M12 Socket Head Screw at Hook Bracket
M12 Socket
Head Screw
RDL
3.1 Design Criteria
Diameter of Screw, dscrew = 12.00 mm

Quantity of Screw, ns = 2.00 pcs
3.2 Checking Tensile Capacity of Screw
Total Tensile Load, Rt = RDL

= 3292.23 N
Design Reaction per Screw, ft = Rt

ns
= 1646.12 N
Tensile Strength of M12 Socket Head = 2219 lbs

Screw, Ft = 9870.11 N
Refer to Fig 3.1: AAMA-TIR-A9-91, Table 11
Since Ft > ft Therefore, M12 Socket Head Screw is SAFE on tensile strength.
Date: May 11, 2020
Fig 3.1: AAMA TIR A9-91 Table 11
Fig 3.2: ADM 2005 Allowable Stress for 6063-T6
Item: Analysis of Bolts and Screw @ Non-Hotspot Condition (-4.25kPa)
Date: May 11, 2020
I. Load Reactions
Negative Wind Load Reaction, RWL = 30900.00 N VII.A Reaction 2/4

Design Dead Load Reaction, RDL = 3292.23 N VII.A Reaction 2/4
II. Adequacy Check of M12 Hex. Head Machine Bolt
M12 HHMB RDL
RWL
2.1 Design Criteria

Quantity of Bolt, nb = 6.00 pc/s.
2.2 Checking Shear Capacity of Bolt
2 2 1/2
Total Shear Load, Rv = (RWL + RDL )
= 31074.89 N
Design Reaction per Machine Bolt, fv = Rv

nb
= 5179.15 N
Shear (Single) Strength of M12 Bolt, Fv = 2219 lbs

Refer to Fig. 3.1; AAMA-TIR-A9-91, Table 11 = 9870.11 N
Since Fv > fv Therefore, M12 HHMB is SAFE on shear strength.
2.3 Checking Bearing Capacity of Material
Thickness of Mullion Member, tm = 3.00 mm

Thickness of Bearing Plate Member, tb = 4.00 mm
Cross-sectional Area of Bearing , Ap = tb dbolt
= 48.00 mm2
Allowable Bearing Stress, Fp = 31.00 ksi

Refer to Fig. 3.2: ADM 2005 Allowable Stress fo 6063-T6 = 213.75 MPa
Actual Bearing per Bolt on Muliion, fp = fv

Ap
= 107.90 MPa
Since Fp > fp Therefore, material is SAFE on bearing stress.
Date: May 11, 2020
III. Adequacy Check of M12 Socket Head Screw at Hook Bracket
M12 Socket
Head Screw
RDL
3.1 Design Criteria
Diameter of Screw, dscrew = 12.00 mm

Quantity of Screw, ns = 2.00 pcs
3.2 Checking Tensile Capacity of Screw
Total Tensile Load, Rt = RDL

= 3292.23 N
Design Reaction per Screw, ft = Rt

ns
= 1646.12 N
Tensile Strength of M12 Socket Head = 2219 lbs

Screw, Ft = 9870.11 N
Refer to Fig 3.1: AAMA-TIR-A9-91, Table 11
Since Ft > ft Therefore, M12 Socket Head Screw is SAFE on tensile strength.
Date: May 11, 2020
Fig 3.1: AAMA TIR A9-91 Table 11
Fig 3.2: ADM 2005 Allowable Stress for 6063-T6
Item: Analysis of Anchor Bolt at Hotspot (-6.75kPa)
Date: May 11, 2020
• FIG.1.1 :
RDL
RWL
Design Wind Pressure, +wp = 6.75 kPa

Spacing Between Anchor Bolt, s = 120.0 mm
= 4.7 in
Number of Bolts, n = 5.0
Number of Thread/inch, nt = 14.0
Outside Diameter of Anchor, d = 16.0 mm
= 0.6 in
Head Diameter of Anchor, do = 32.0 mm
= 1.3 in
Embedment Depth of Anchor, hef = 400.0 mm
= 15.7 in
Thickness of Concrete, t = 510.0 mm
= 20.1 in
Concrete Compressive Strength, fc' = 7500.00 psi
= 51.72 MPa
Specified Yield Strength of Anchor, fy = 50.00 ksi
= 344.75 MPa
II. Tensile Capacity
A. STEEL STRENGHT IN TENSION
Effective Cross-sectional area of Single Anchor in Tension (D.5.1) Eqn D-3

AseN = π/4 (d-0.9743/nt)2
2
= 0.25 mm
Specified Tensile Strength of Anchor in Tension

futa = min.(1.9 fy ; 125ksi)
= 95000.00 psi
Modification Factor for Anchor Sec. D.4.4a ASTM A 193

Grade B7 Rods Comply as Ductile
ɸ = 0.75
VII.E1 Anchor Bolt 1/6
Date: May 11, 2020
Nominal Steel Strength of a Group of Anchor in Tension

Nsa = nt AseN futa
= 327965.2 lbf
Steel Strength of a Group of Anchor in Shear, ɸNsa

= 245973.9 lbf
1094092.03 N
B. CONCRETE BREAK-OUT STRENGHT IN TENSION
Distance From Center of Anchor to concrete edge (RD.6.2.1)

cal = 1.5 hef
= 23.6 in
Projected Concrete Failure Area of Group of Anchor (D.5.2.1) Eqn D-6

ANc = (cal + 1.5 hef) (1.5hef + (n-1)s + 1.5hef)
2
= 3124.8 in
Projected Concrete Failure Area of Single of Anchor (D.5.2.1) Eqn D-6

ANco = 9hef2
2
= 2232.0 in
Distance Between Load Reaction Eccentricity (D.5.2.6)

eN = 1.4 in
Modification Factor for Anchor Group Loaded Eccentrically in Tension (D.6.2.5), ψ ecN < = 1.0
ψ ecN 1
= 2eN
1+
3hef
= 1.00
Minimum Edge Distance from Center of Anchor

ed = 4.9 in
Modification Factor for Edge Effect Loaded in Tension (D.5.2.5), ψ edN < = 1.0
ψ edN = ed
(0.7 + 0.3 , 1.0) minimum
1.5hef
= 0.76
Coefficient for Basic Concrete Break-out, kc (D5.2.2)

Cast-in = 24
Post-installed = 17
Modification Factor for Cracked and Non-cracked Concrete ψ cN (D5.2.6)

Cracked = 1.0
Non-cracked = 1.4
Modification Factor for Post Installed Anchors (D5.2.6)

ψ cpN = 1.0 cracked
ψ cpN = 1.4 non-cracked
Modification Factor Reflecting the Reduce Mechanical

Properties of Lightweight concrete, D.8.6.1
λ = 1.0
Basic Concrete Break-out Strength in Tension, D5.2.2

Nb = kc λ √fc' (hef)1.5
= 92006.60 lbf
Date: May 11, 2020
Nominal Concrete Break-out Strength in Tension, D5.2.1

Ncbg = ANc
ψ ecN * ψ edN * ψ cN * ψ cpN* Nb
ANco
= 97992.0 lbf
Modification Factor for Anchor w/ Reinforcement Concrete Condition B (D.4.4.c)

ɸ = 0.7
Concrete Break-out Strength in Tension, ɸNcbg = 68594.4 lbf

305107.87 N
C. PULL-OUT STRENGHT IN TENSION
Net Bearing Area of Head Bolt Eqn D-15, Abrg = π/4 (do2-d2)
2
0.93 in
Pull-out Strength of Single Bolt (D5.3.4), Np = 8 Abrg fc

= 56096.52 lbf
Nominal Pull-out Strength of Single Bolt (D5.3.1)

NpN = ψ cpN Np
= 56096.52 lbf
Nominal Pull-out Strength of Group of Bolt (D5.3.1)

n NpN = ψ cpN Np
= 280482.61 lbf
Pull-out Strength of Group of Bolt ɸ NpN = ɸ n Np

= 196337.83 lbf
873310.65 N
III. Shear Capacity
A. STEEL STRENGHT IN SHEAR
Effective Cross-sectional area of Single Anchor in Shear (RD.6.1.2)

AseV = 0.25π(d)
2
= 0.31 in
Specified Tensile Strength of Anchor in Shear

futa = 95000.00 psi
Nominal steel Strength of a Group of Anchor in Shear

Vsa = n AseV futa
= 148032.49 lbf
Modification Factor for Anchor Sec. D.4.4a

ɸ = 0.65
Steel Strength of a Group of Anchor in Shear, ɸVsa

= 96221.1 lbf
427991.53 N
Date: May 11, 2020
B. CONCRETE BREAK-OUT STRENGHT IN SHEAR

cal = 1.5 hef
= 23.6 in
Thickness of Slab (effective in resisting shear)

ha = t if t less than or equal to 1.5 cal
otherwise use 1.5 cal
= 20.1 in
Projected Concrete Failure Area of Group of Anchor (D.6.2.1)

AVc = (1.5cal + (n-1)s + 1.5.cal)ha
2
= 1802.3 in
Projected Concrete Failure Area of Single of Anchor (D.6.2.1)

Avco = (3cal)ha
2
= 1422.9 in

ev = 1.4 in
Modification Factor for Anchor Group Loaded Eccentrically in Shear (D.6.2.5), ψ ecV < = 1.0
ψ ecV 1
= 2eV
1+
3cal
= 0.96
Modification Factor for Edge Effect Loaded in Shear (D.6.2.6)

ψ edV = 1.0
Modification Factor for non-cracked or cracked w/ 0.5"

rebars between anchor and concrete edge (D.6.2.7)
ψ cV = 1.4
Modification Factor for Concrete Thickness (D.6.2.8), ψ hV = 1.0

ψ hV = (√ 1.5cal\ha), 1.0
= 1.33
Load Bearing length of Anchor for Shear, D.6.2.2

Ie = hef for Anchors w/ Constant Stiffness over full length
Ie = hef
= 15.7 in

λ = 1.0
Basic Concrete Break-out Strength in Shear, D6.2.2

Vb = 7 (Ie/d)0.2 √d λ √fc' (cal)1.5
= 105156.50 lbf
Date: May 11, 2020
Nominal Concrete Break-out Strength in Shear, D6.2.2

Vcbg = AVc
ψ ecV * ψ edV * ψ cV * Vb
AVco
= 238447.9 lbf

ɸ = 0.7
Concrete Break-out Strength in Shear, ɸVcbg = 166913.5 lbf

742431.46 N
C. PRY-OUT STRENGTH IN SHEAR
Coefficient for Pry-out Strength, kcp = 1.0 if hef < 2.5" or 63.5mm; 2.0 otherwise
= 2.0
Nominal Concrete Break-out Strength of Group of Anchors in tension

Ncbg = 97991.99 lbf
Nominal Pry-out Strength of Group of Anchors (D.6.3.1)

Vcpg = kcp Ncbg
= 195983.99
Pry-out Strength of Group of Anchors, ɸVcpg = 137188.79 lbf

610215.75 N
Summary of Nominal Strength in Reduction Factor ɸ
Tension Load lbf ɸ ɸN

Steel Strength Nsa = 327965.24 0.75 1094092.03
Concrete Breakout Ncbg = 97991.99 0.70 305107.87
Pull-out Strength n Npn = 280482.61 0.70 873310.65
Shear Load
Steel Strength Vsa = 148032.49 0.65 427991.53
Concrete Breakout Vcbg = 238447.93 0.70 742431.46
Pry-out Strength Vcpg = 195983.99 0.70 610215.75
Concrete Capacity
ɸNc = min(ɸn Npn, ɸNcbg) = 305107.87 N

ɸVc = min(ɸn Vcg, ɸVcpg) = 610215.75 N
Strength in Tension Tg = min(ɸNsa, ɸNc) = 305107.87 N
Strength in Shear Vg = min(ɸn Vsa, ɸVc) = 427991.53 N
Date: May 11, 2020
III. Actual Loads
Load Eccentricity, e = 35.00

Distance of Prying Action, d = 68.00
Shear Load Reaction, RWL = 45200.00 N VII.A Reaction 1/4
Dead Load Reaction, RDL = 3292.23 N VII.A Reaction 1/4
Tensile Load Reaction, TWL = e RWL
- RDL
5/6 d
= 24625.42 N
Factor of Safety F.S, = 1.30
Overload Factor O.F, = 1.33
Design Shear Load Reaction, V = RWL F.S O.F
= 78150.80 N
= 347614.76 lb
Design Tensile Load Reaction, T = TWL F.S O.F
= 42577.35 N
= 189384.04 lb
IV. Shear and Tension Load Combination
A. STEEL FAILURE MODE
V
= 0.18
ɸVsa
T
= 0.04
ɸTsa
V T
+ = 0.22 < 1.2 OKAY
ɸVsa ɸTsa
CONCRETE FAILURE MODE
V
= 0.57
ɸVc
T
= 0.62
ɸNc
V T
+ = 1.19 < 1.2 OKAY
ɸVc ɸTc
Item: Analysis of Anchor Bolt at Non-Hotspot (-4.25kPa)
Date: May 11, 2020
• FIG.1.1 :
RDL
RWL
Design Wind Pressure, +wp = 4.25 kPa

Spacing Between Anchor Bolt, s = 150.0 mm
= 5.9 in
Number of Bolts, n = 3.0
Number of Thread/inch, nt = 14.0
Outside Diameter of Anchor, d = 16.0 mm
= 0.6 in
Head Diameter of Anchor, do = 32.0 mm
= 1.3 in
Embedment Depth of Anchor, hef = 350.0 mm
= 13.8 in
Thickness of Slab, t = 510.0 mm
= 20.1 in
Concrete Compressive Strength, fc' = 7500.00 psi
= 51.72 MPa
Specified Yield Strength of Anchor, fy = 50.00 ksi
= 344.75 MPa
II. Tensile Capacity
A. STEEL STRENGHT IN TENSION
Effective Cross-sectional area of Single Anchor in Tension (D.5.1) Eqn D-3

AseN = π/4 (d-0.9743/nt)2
2
= 0.25 mm
Specified Tensile Strength of Anchor in Tension

futa = min.(1.9 fy ; 125ksi)
= 95000.00 psi
Modification Factor for Anchor Sec. D.4.4a ASTM A 193

Grade B7 Rods Comply as Ductile
ɸ = 0.75
Date: May 11, 2020
Nominal Steel Strength of a Group of Anchor in Tension

Nsa = nt AseN futa
= 327965.2 lbf
Steel Strength of a Group of Anchor in Shear, ɸNsa

= 245973.9 lbf
1094092.03 N
B. CONCRETE BREAK-OUT STRENGHT IN TENSION

cal = 1.5 hef
= 20.7 in
Projected Concrete Failure Area of Group of Anchor (D.5.2.1) Eqn D-6

ANc = (cal + 1.5 hef) (1.5hef + (n-1)s + 1.5hef)
2
= 2197.1 in
Projected Concrete Failure Area of Single of Anchor (D.5.2.1) Eqn D-6

ANco = 9hef2
2
= 1708.9 in

eN = 1.4 in
Modification Factor for Anchor Group Loaded Eccentrically in Tension (D.6.2.5), ψ ecN < = 1.0
ψ ecN 1
= 2eN
1+
3hef
= 1.00
Minimum Edge Distance from Center of Anchor

ed = 4.9 in
Modification Factor for Edge Effect Loaded in Tension (D.5.2.5), ψ edN < = 1.0
ψ edN = ed
(0.7 + 0.3 , 1.0) minimum
1.5hef
= 0.77
Coefficient for Basic Concrete Break-out, kc (D5.2.2)

Cast-in = 24
Post-installed = 17
Modification Factor for Cracked and Non-cracked Concrete ψ cN (D5.2.6)

Cracked = 1.0
Non-cracked = 1.4
Modification Factor for Post Installed Anchors (D5.2.6)

ψ cpN = 1.0 cracked
ψ cpN = 1.4 non-cracked

λ = 1.0
Basic Concrete Break-out Strength in Tension, D5.2.2

Nb = kc λ √fc' (hef)1.5
= 75306.25 lbf
Date: May 11, 2020
Nominal Concrete Break-out Strength in Tension, D5.2.1

Ncbg = ANc
ψ ecN * ψ edN * ψ cN * ψ cpN* Nb
ANco
= 74496.0 lbf

ɸ = 0.7
Concrete Break-out Strength in Tension, ɸNcbg = 52147.2 lbf

231950.69 N
C. PULL-OUT STRENGHT IN TENSION
Net Bearing Area of Head Bolt Eqn D-15, Abrg = π/4 (do2-d2)
2
0.93 in
Pull-out Strength of Single Bolt (D5.3.4), Np = 8 Abrg fc

= 56096.52 lbf
Nominal Pull-out Strength of Single Bolt (D5.3.1)

NpN = ψ cpN Np
= 56096.52 lbf
Nominal Pull-out Strength of Group of Bolt (D5.3.1)

n NpN = ψ cpN Np
= 168289.57 lbf
Pull-out Strength of Group of Bolt ɸ NpN = ɸ n Np

= 117802.70 lbf
523986.39 N
III. Shear Capacity
A. STEEL STRENGHT IN SHEAR
Effective Cross-sectional area of Single Anchor in Shear (RD.6.1.2)

AseV = 0.25π(d)
2
= 0.31 in
Specified Tensile Strength of Anchor in Shear

futa = 95000.00 psi
Nominal steel Strength of a Group of Anchor in Shear

Vsa = n AseV futa
= 88819.49 lbf
Modification Factor for Anchor Sec. D.4.4a

ɸ = 0.65
Steel Strength of a Group of Anchor in Shear, ɸVsa

= 57732.7 lbf
256794.92 N
Date: May 11, 2020
B. CONCRETE BREAK-OUT STRENGHT IN SHEAR

cal = 1.5 hef
= 20.7 in
Thickness of Slab (effective in resisting shear)

ha = t if t less than or equal to 1.5 cal
otherwise use 1.5 cal
= 20.1 in
Projected Concrete Failure Area of Group of Anchor (D.6.2.1)

AVc = (1.5cal + (n-1)s + 1.5.cal)ha
2
= 1482.2 in
Projected Concrete Failure Area of Single of Anchor (D.6.2.1)

Avco = (3cal)ha
2
= 1245.0 in

ev = 1.4 in
Modification Factor for Anchor Group Loaded Eccentrically in Shear (D.6.2.5), ψ ecV < = 1.0
ψ ecV 1
= 2eV
1+
3cal
= 0.96
Modification Factor for Edge Effect Loaded in Shear (D.6.2.6)

ψ edV = 1.0
Modification Factor for non-cracked or cracked w/ 0.5"

rebars between anchor and concrete edge (D.6.2.7)
ψ cV = 1.4
Modification Factor for Concrete Thickness (D.6.2.8), ψ hV = 1.0

ψ hV = (√ 1.5cal\ha), 1.0
= 1.24
Load Bearing length of Anchor for Shear, D.6.2.2

Ie = hef for Anchors w/ Constant Stiffness over full length
Ie = hef
= 13.8 in

λ = 1.0
Basic Concrete Break-out Strength in Shear, D6.2.2

Vb = 7 (Ie/d)0.2 √d λ √fc' (cal)1.5
= 83801.12 lbf
Date: May 11, 2020
Nominal Concrete Break-out Strength in Shear, D6.2.2

Vcbg = AVc
ψ ecV * ψ edV * ψ cV * Vb
AVco
= 166170.3 lbf

ɸ = 0.7
Concrete Break-out Strength in Shear, ɸVcbg = 116319.2 lbf

517387.84 N
C. PRY-OUT STRENGTH IN SHEAR
Coefficient for Pry-out Strength, kcp = 1.0 if hef < 2.5" or 63.5mm; 2.0 otherwise
= 2.0
Nominal Concrete Break-out Strength of Group of Anchors in tension

Ncbg = 74495.98 lbf
Nominal Pry-out Strength of Group of Anchors (D.6.3.1)

Vcpg = kcp Ncbg
= 148991.96
Pry-out Strength of Group of Anchors, ɸVcpg = 104294.37 lbf

463901.38 N
Summary of Nominal Strength in Reduction Factor ɸ
Tension Load lbf ɸ ɸN

Steel Strength Nsa = 327965.24 0.75 1094092.03
Concrete Breakout Ncbg = 74495.98 0.70 231950.69
Pull-out Strength n Npn = 168289.57 0.70 523986.39
Shear Load
Steel Strength Vsa = 88819.49 0.65 256794.92
Concrete Breakout Vcbg = 166170.30 0.70 517387.84
Pry-out Strength Vcpg = 148991.96 0.70 463901.38
Concrete Capacity
ɸNc = min(ɸn Npn, ɸNcbg) = 231950.69 N

ɸVc = min(ɸn Vcg, ɸVcpg) = 463901.38 N
Strength in Tension Tg = min(ɸNsa, ɸNc) = 231950.69 N
Strength in Shear Vg = min(ɸn Vsa, ɸVc) = 256794.92 N
Date: May 11, 2020
III. Actual Loads
Load Eccentricity, e = 35.00

Distance of Prying Action, d = 68.00
Shear Load Reaction, RWL = 30900.00 N VII.A Reaction 1/4
Dead Load Reaction, RDL = 3292.23 N VII.A Reaction 1/4
Tensile Load Reaction, TWL = e RWL
- RDL
5/6 d
= 15793.06 N
Factor of Safety F.S, = 1.30
Overload Factor O.F, = 1.33
Design Shear Load Reaction, V = RWL F.S O.F
= 53426.10 N
= 237639.29 lb
Design Tensile Load Reaction, T = TWL F.S O.F
= 27306.21 N
= 121458.01 lb
IV. Shear and Tension Load Combination
A. STEEL FAILURE MODE
V
= 0.21
ɸVsa
T
= 0.02
ɸTsa
V T
+ = 0.23 < 1.2 OKAY
ɸVsa ɸTsa
CONCRETE FAILURE MODE
V
= 0.51
ɸVc
T
= 0.52
ɸNc
V T
+ = 1.04 < 1.2 OKAY
ɸVc ɸTc
VIII. ANALYSIS OF OPERABLE WINDOW AND
COMPONENTS
NU STAR CEBU

Item: Analysis of Sash Frame @ Hotspot (6.75kPa)
Date: May 11, 2020
• FIG.1.0 : Partial Elevation of Curtain Wall System

Refer to Partial Elevation No. APP-PE01
Refer to Drawing No. D-107
Max. Design Wind Pressure, wp = 6.75 kPa

Maximum Tributary Width, tw = 750.00 mm
Center to Center Spacing bet. Mullions, Lc = 1500.00 mm
Total Length of Vertical Frame, L = 2400.00 mm
Max. Unsupported Length of Frame, LU = 600.00 mm
Max Unbraced Length of Frame, Lb = 600.00 mm
Max.Location of Locking Points.( see staad report)
Total Thickness of IGU Glass, tg = 28.00 mm
3
3
3
Area of Glass, Aglass = Lc L
= 3600000.00 mm2
2
Weight of Glass, Wglass = Ug Aglass tg
= 2472.120 N
Concentrated Load of Glass @ L/4, Pglass = Wglass / 2
= 1236.060 N
Weight of Vertical Sash Frame, Wver-sash = 60.442 N
Weight of Horizontal Sash Frame, Whor-sash = 37.776 N
Total Weigth of Operable Frames, Woperable = Wver-sash + Whor-sash
= 98.218 N
VIII.A Sash Frame 1/8
Date: May 11, 2020
2.1 Section Member : Sash Frame (6063 -T6)

4
Ix-sf = 120365.749 mm
4
Iy-sf = 57684.227 mm
2
Asf = 475.405 mm
csfy = 28.892 mm
3
Sc = 4166.087 mm
rx-sf = 15.91 mm
ry-sf = 11.015 mm
Torsional Constant :
4
Jsf = 20103.40 mm
• FIGURE 2.1 :
2.2 Computation of Torsional Constant for Sash Frame :
2.6.1 Torsional Computation for Rectangular Hollow Tube Element

t1 = 3.00 mm
t2 = 3.00 mm
a = 49.00 mm
b = 12.30 mm
J1 = 2 t1 t2 ( a - t1 )2 ( b - t2 )2
( a t1 + b t2 - t12 - t22 )
4
J1 = 19856.728 mm
Date: May 11, 2020
2.6.2 Torsional Computation for Open Parts, Jsf
3 3
n b t b/t n(1/3-0.2t/b)bt nbt /3
1 1.00 26.70 3.10 8.613 246.67 0
TOTAL 246.67 0.00

Jsf = J1 + J2
= 20103.40 mm4
2.8 Member : (No Steel Insert)
Total Area of Steel Stiffener :

2
Asf = 0.00 mm
Total Weight of Steel Stiffener :
Wsf = 0.000 N
4
Ix-sf = 0.00 mm
Iy-sf = 0.00 mm4
Modulus of Elasticity :
Es = 200000.00 MPa
Cy-sf = 0.00 mm
Modular Ratio:
-1
n = Es x Ea
= 2.874

Ix-tot = Ix-sf + (n * Ix-ms)
= 120365.75 mm4

Iy-tot = Iy-sf + (n * Iy-ms)
4
= 57684.23 mm
Total Cross Sectional Area Sash Frame :

2
ATOTAL = 475.41 mm
Uniformly Distributed Load due to Wind Load, = wp tw

WWL = 5.06 N/mm
Date: May 11, 2020

Refer to STAAD Report (Beam Force Detail Summary)

Refer to STAAD Report (Beam Force Detail Summary)
TABLE 1: STAAD REPORT (Beam Force Detail Summary)
FIGURE A: STAAD MODEL
FIGURE B: STAAD MODEL WITH BEAM AND NODE LABELS
Beam Labels Node Labels
Date: May 11, 2020
Lu
Allowable Deflection, dallow =
175
= 3.43 mm
Actual Deflection from Staad, dstaad = 0.230 mm

Refer to STAAD Report (Beam Displacement Summary)
dmax < dallow SAFE
TABLE 1: STAAD REPORT (Beam Displacement Summary)
VII. CHECK BENDING STRESS PER ALUMINUM DESIGN MANUAL

Refer to ADM Table 2.24: Allowable Stresses For Building Type Structures (6063 – T6 Extrusions & Pipe)
7.1 Member: Vertical Sash Frame Extrusion
ADM Table 2-24 Sec. 3.4.2 Tension in Beam "Ft" ( Extreme Fiber , Net Section )
Allow. Tensile Stress, Ft = 15.00 ksi

= 103.43 MPa
ADM Table 2-24 Sec. 3.4.11 Compression in Component of Beam "Fb1" :

Slenderness, S = Lb
ry-sf
= 54.470
S1 < S < S2

= 12.72 ksi
= 87.73 MPa
Date: May 11, 2020
ADM Table 2-24 Sec. 3.4.14 Compression in beam "Fb2" :

2 Lb Sc
Slenderness, S =
√Ix J
= 101.63
S1 > S < S2

= 103.43 MPa
ADM Table 2-24 Sec. 3.4.16 Compression in Component of Beam, "Fb3" :


= 5.50
S1 > S < S2

= 103.43 MPa
ADM Table 2-24 Sec. 3.4.18 Compression Component in beam, "Fb4"

Height of section or Element, b = 42.00 mm

= 14.00
S1 > S < S2

= 137.90 MPa
7.2 Allowable Bending Stress (consider Fb1 to govern)
Allowable Bending, Fb = 87.73 MPa
7.3 Check Actual Bending Stress in Vertical Sash Frame
Max. Moment carried by Vertical Sash Frame, Mmax Ix-sf

=
Mmax-sf Ix-tot
= 109000.00 N-mm
Actual Bending Stress of Vertical Sash Frame, Mmax-sf csfy

=
fb Ix-sf
= 26.16 MPa
fb < Fb SAFE
Date: May 11, 2020
8.1 Due To Dead load
Total Axial Dead load, RDL = 1.1 (Wglass + Wver-sash + Whor-sash + Wsf)
= 2719.33 N

Refer to ADM Table 2.24: Allowable Stresses For Building Type Structures (6063 – T6 Extrusions & Pipe)
ADM Table 2-24 Sec. 3.4.1 Tension, Axial "Ft"


= 103.43 MPa
ADM Table 2-24 Sec. 3.4.7 Compression in column " Fa1" ( Axial Gross Section )
(compression in column, axial : all column)
Slenderness, S = k Lb
r
= 54.47
Upper Slenderness limit, S2 = 78.00
S1 < S < S2
Flexural Buckling Check, Fa1 = 14.2 - 0.074 kLb/r

= 10.17 ksi
= 70.12 MPa
ADM Table 2-24 Sec. 3.4.9 Compression in Column Elements " Fa2" ( Gross Section )
(compression in column elements, gross section : flat elements supported on both edge)
Width of Section or Element, b = 49.00 mm

Thickness of Section or Element, t2 = 3.00 mm
= 16.33 mm
Upper Slenderness limit, S2 = 39.00
S1 < S < S2
Local Buckling Check, Fa2 = 16.0 - 0.14 b/t

= 13.65 ksi
= 94.10 MPa
9.2 Allowable Axial Compressive Stress ( Fa1 govern )
Allowable Compressive Strength, Fa = 70.12 MPa
Axial Dead load, RDL = 2719.33 N

Actual Axial Compressive Stress, fa = RDL / Asf
= 5.72 MPa
fa < Fa SAFE
Date: May 11, 2020
X. CHECK UNDER COMBINED AXIAL COMPRESSION AND BENDING STRESSES :
Actual Compressive Stress, fa = 5.72 MPa

Allowable Axial Stress, Fa = 70.12 MPa
fa fb
+ = 0.38 < 1.00 SAFE
Fa Fb
Item: Analysis of Hinge Connections
Date: May 11, 2020
Total Weight of Glass & Accessories, Wg = 357.080 N V.A Transom 5/7
Maximum Dead Load, RDL = Wg N

= 357.080 N
Actual Tension, TDL = 4 RDL

3 2
= 238.053 N
Number of Connections, n = 3
• FIG.2.0 : Friction Bar Hinge Connections at Mullion and Vertical Sash Frame
Reference Drawing Details
SASH FRAME
BAR HINGE
#10 SCREW
II. CHECK ALLOWABLE SHEAR & BEARING AS PER ALUMINUM DESIGN MANUAL
2.1 Direct Shear Load
Maximum Design Shear Per Screw, Vmax = RDL / n

= 119.03 N

Ultimate Tensile Strength of Steel, Ftu1 = 60.00 ksi
Thickness of Member in contact w/ screw = 1.20 mm
head, t1 = 0.05 in

= 0.55 kips
= 2457.04 N
Vallow > Vmax SAFE
VIII.B Hinge 1/4
Date: May 11, 2020

Thickness of Member not in contact w/ screw = 3.00 mm
head, t2 = 0.12 in

= 0.69 kips
= 3071.30 N
Vallow > Vmax SAFE

Min. Tensile Yield Strength, Fy = 65 ksi
( Appendices: AAMA TIR A9-91, Table 11 ) = 9.806 mm2
= 4395.592 N
= 1172.158 N
Vallow > Vmax SAFE

= 5.76

= 20.66 MPa

= 144.80 MPa
Fp > fp SAFE
III. CHECK ALLOWABLE TENSION AS PER ALUMINUM DESIGN MANUAL
Actual Tensile Force, Pu = TDL / n

= 79.351 N

= 0.118 in
1.5 mm < tc < 3 mm
VIII.B Hinge 2/4
Date: May 11, 2020
Ks = 1.2 for 1.5mm ≤ tc ≤ 3mm

Nominal Pull-Out Strength of Screw, Pnot = Ks D tc Fty2 Eq. 5.4.2.1-1
= 0.673 kips
= 998.173 N
Pallow > Pu SAFE

Ultimate Tensile Strength of Steel, Ftu1 = 60 ksi
Screw Coefficient for valley fastening, C = 1
Thickness of Member in contact w/ screw head, t1 = 1.2 mm
= 0.047 in
= 0.522 kips
= 773.388 N
Pallow > Pu SAFE

Ultimate Tensile Strength of Screw, Fu = 110 ksi
Tensile Stress Area, A (S) = 0.0175 in2
= 11.290 mm2
= 3422.767 N
= 912.738 N
Pallow > Pu SAFE
IV. CHECK COMBINED TENSILE & SHEAR STRESS :

Vmax2 Pu
+ = 0.09 < 1
Vallow2 Pallow
VIII.B Hinge 3/4
Date: May 11, 2020
V. CHECK FOR BAR HINGE CAPACITY
Total Load that Bar Hinge Will Carry, DLBH = RDL

= 357.080 N
Bar Hinge Capacity, DL = 45.00 kg

= 441.45 N
DL > DLBH SAFE
FIGURE 1.1: Friction Bar Hinge Capacities
Note: Use Bar hinge capacity of 45kg or equivalent.
VIII.B Hinge 4/4
Item: Analysis of Lock Points
Date: May 11, 2020
• FIG.1.0 : Partial Elevation of Curtain Wall System

Refer to Partial Elevation No. APP-PE01
LEGEND: --- LOCKING POINTS

= 688.08 kgs/m2
II. DESIGN OF LOCKING POINTS
2.1 Required Number of Locking Points
Height of Operable Window, h = 2400 mm V.ATransom 1/7

Center to Center Spacing of Mullion, Lc = 1500 mm V.ATransom 1/7
Total Mullion Width, wm = 90 mm V.ATransom 1/7
Length of Horizontal Frame, L = Lc - wm
= 1410 mm
Capacity of Each Locking Points, LCAP = 1.950 kN

= 198.78 kg
Number of Locking Points , n = h Lc wp

LCAP
= 11.71 pcs.
REMARKS: Provide 12 Locking Points.

See spacing of locking points at sheet no. VIII.A Sash Frame 4/8
VIII.C Lock Points 1/1
IX. APPENDICES
NU STAR CEBU

A. ENGINEERING DATA
NU STAR CEBU

ADM: TABLE 3.3-1
NU STAR CEBU
ADM: TABLE 2-22
NU STAR CEBU
ADM: TABLE 2-22
NU STAR CEBU
ASTM E 1300: TABLE 1 to TABLE 4
NU STAR CEBU
ASTM E 1300: TABLE 5 and TABLE 6
NU STAR CEBU
NU STAR CEBU
NU STAR CEBU
NU STAR CEBU
AAMA TIR A9-91: TABLE 11
NU STAR CEBU
B. STAAD INPUT
NU STAR CEBU

STAAD INPUT FOR MULLION ANALYSIS 8 10 16 TO 19 FIXED BUT MX MY MZ
LOAD 1 LOADTYPE Dead TITLE -WL@HOTSPOT

STAAD SPACE
MEMBER LOAD
START JOB INFORMATION
11 12 16 19 UNI GZ 8.625
ENGINEER DATE 08-May-19
8 TO 10 15 17 18 UNI GZ 10.125
END JOB INFORMATION
LOAD 2 LOADTYPE Dead TITLE -WL@NON-HOTSPOT
INPUT WIDTH 79
MEMBER LOAD
UNIT MMS NEWTON
8 TO 12 15 TO 19 UNI GZ 6.375
JOINT COORDINATES
LOAD 3 LOADTYPE Dead TITLE DL
6 0 12200 0; 8 0 15170 0; 9 0 15900 0; 10 0 18870 0; 11 0
19600 0; SELFWEIGHT Y -1.2
12 0 24035 0; 13 0 25030 0; 16 0 23735 0; 17 0 11470 0; 18 0 LOAD COMB 4 DL+(-WL@HOTSPOT)
8500 0;
3 1.0 1 1.0
19 0 24733 0;
LOAD COMB 5 DL+(-WL@NON-HOTSPOT)
MEMBER INCIDENCES
3 1.0 2 1.0
8 8 9; 9 9 10; 10 10 11; 11 11 16; 12 12 19; 15 6 8; 16 16 12;
17 17 6; PERFORM ANALYSIS
18 18 17; 19 19 13; FINISH
START GROUP DEFINITION
MEMBER
_HIGHSPAN 11 12 16 19
_TYPICAL 8 TO 10 15 17 18
JOINT
END GROUP DEFINITION
DEFINE MATERIAL START
ISOTROPIC ALUMINUM
E 68947.6
POISSON 0.33
DENSITY 2.66018e-005
ALPHA 2.3e-005
DAMP 0.03
END DEFINE MATERIAL
MEMBER PROPERTY AMERICAN
8 TO 12 15 TO 19 PRIS AX 2761.25 IX 1000 IY 1.16548e+007

IZ 906083
CONSTANTS
MATERIAL ALUMINUM ALL
MEMBER RELEASE
9 11 12 START FX MY MZ
SUPPORTS
STAAD INPUT FOR OPERABLE FRAME MEMBER PROPERTY AMERICAN
1 TO 16 PRIS AX 475.405 IX 1000 IY 120366 IZ 57684.2

STAAD SPACE
CONSTANTS
START JOB INFORMATION
MATERIAL ALUMINUM ALL
ENGINEER DATE 10-May-20
SUPPORTS
END JOB INFORMATION
5 TO 16 FIXED BUT MX MY MZ
INPUT WIDTH 79
LOAD 1 LOADTYPE None TITLE WINDLOAD AT HOTSPOT
UNIT MMS NEWTON
FLOOR LOAD
JOINT COORDINATES
_FRAME FLOAD 0.00675 GZ
1 0 0 0; 2 0 2400 0; 3 1500 0 0; 4 1500 2400 0; 5 375 2400 0;
6 1125 2400 0; LOAD 2 LOADTYPE None TITLE WINDLOAD AT NON-
HOTSPOT
7 375 0 0; 8 1125 0 0; 9 0 200 0; 10 1500 200 0; 11 0 1800 0;
12 1500 1800 0; FLOOR LOAD
13 0 700 0; 14 1500 700 0; 15 0 1200 0; 16 1500 1200 0; _FRAME FLOAD 0.00425 GZ
MEMBER INCIDENCES LOAD 3 LOADTYPE None TITLE DL
1 1 9; 2 3 10; 3 1 7; 4 2 5; 5 5 6; 6 6 4; 7 7 8; 8 8 3; 9 9 13; 10 SELFWEIGHT Y -1.2 LIST ALL
10 14;
LOAD COMB 4 COMBINATION LOAD CASE 4
11 11 2; 12 12 4; 13 13 15; 14 14 16; 15 15 11; 16 16 12;
1 1.0 3 1.0
START GROUP DEFINITION
LOAD COMB 5 COMBINATION LOAD CASE 5
FLOOR
2 1.0 3 1.0
_FRAME 1 TO 16
PERFORM ANALYSIS
MEMBER
FINISH
_VERTFRAME 1 9 11 13 15
END GROUP DEFINITION
DEFINE MATERIAL START
ISOTROPIC CONCRETE
E 21718.5
POISSON 0.17
ALPHA 1e-005
DAMP 0.05
TYPE CONCRETE
STRENGTH FCU 27.579
ISOTROPIC ALUMINUM
E 68947.6
POISSON 0.33
ALPHA 2.3e-005
DAMP 0.03
END DEFINE MATERIAL

Nu Star Cebu Structural Calcs Typical Floor 1sub 12may2020

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Nu Star Cebu Structural Calcs Typical Floor 1sub 12may2020

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS

OF TYPICAL FLOOR CURTAIN WALL SYSTEM

II. RWDI WIND TUNNEL TEST REPORT (TOWER 1)

III. ANALYSIS OF GLASS

IV. ANALYSIS OF MULLION

VI. ANALYSIS OF TRANSOM AND MULLION CONNECTION

VII. ANALYSIS OF BRACKETS, BOLTS AND ANCHOR

VIII. ANALYSIS OF OPERABLE WINDOW AND COMPONENTS

Cebu Southroad Properties, Cebu City, Philippines

1.1 National Structural Code of the Philippines 2015, 6th Edition

2.0 DESIGN LOADS

2.1 DEAD LOADS

2.2 LIVE LOAD

2.4 Other loadings shall be in accordance with NSCP/ASTM

3.0 MATERIAL SPECIFICATIONS

3.1 ALUMINUM - 6063-T6 or 6061-T6 for Extrusions

3.2 STEEL - ASTM A36 for Hot-Rolled Shapes

3.4 EXTERIOR FASTENERS - Stainless Steel, A316

3.5 INTERIOR FASTENERS - QQP 416, Type I, Class 1 CAD-

3.6 WELDS - E70xx Electrode for Steel

Cebu Southroad Properties, Cebu City, Philippines

Key Plan Key Plan of Wall Surface (A)

SEE PODIUM ELEVATION

Key Plan of Wall Surface (B)

SEE PODIUM ELEVATION

Key Plan of Wall Surfaces (C)

SEE TOWER 1 - ELEVATION 2 3.75 LVL 15

TOWER 1 - SECTION C-C

Key Plan of Wall Surfaces (D)

SEE PODIUM ELEVATION

Key Plan Key Plan of Wall Surface (A)

Key Plan of Wall Surface (B)

SEE PODIUM ELEVATION

Key Plan of Wall Surfaces (C)

2.75 3.25 LVL 24

2.75 3.25 LVL 8

TOWER 1 - SECTION C-C

Cebu Southroad Properties, Cebu City, Philippines

Neg. Design Wind Pressure, -q = 6.75 kPa

II. CHECK GLASS ALLOWABLE PRESSURE LOAD:

2.1 Determine Glass Factor

Glass Lite 1, GTF1 = 1.90

2.2 Determine Load Share Factor :

Glass Lite 1, LS1 = 2.00

2.3 Determine Non-Factored Load

Glass Lite 1, NFL1 = 1.90 kPa

2.4 Determine Load Resistance

Glass Lite 1, LR1 = 7.22 kPa

Since LR1 < LR2 wps = 7.22 kPa

2.5 Determine Glass Allowable Pressure Load, wps

wps = 7.22 kPa

Since wps > -q Therefore, glass is SAFE on Pressure Load.

III. CHECK DEFLECTION OF GLASS:

3.1 Allowable Deflection

■ At Full Design Wind Load:

Allowable Deflection, δallow = 35.00 mm

■ At Half Design Wind Load:

Allowable Deflection, δallow/2 = b

3.2 Load Carried By Each Lite, -q/LS :

Glass Lite 1,q1 = -q/LS1 = 3.38 kPa

3.3 Determine Maximum Glass Deflection:

■ At Full Design Load:

■ At Half Design Wind Load: