Professional Documents
Culture Documents
FOR
ZARA INVESTMENT (HOLDING) COMPANY LIM
PREPAIRED BY
MOHAMMED OTHMAN & ASHRAF BANE K
333849 330784
IRED BY
& ASHRAF BANE KENANEH
330784
upervision of
HADDAD
GO TO MAIN MENU==>
FINANCIAL ANALYSIS AND REPORT
FOR
ZARA INVESTMENT (HOLDING) COMPANY LIMIT
1. BALANCE SHEET
2. INCOME STATEMENT
4. NOTES
9. LIQUIDITY RATIOS
) COMPANY LIMITED
ANCE SHEET
OME STATEMENT
ASSETS 2002
For The Year Ended December 31,
current assets -
cash on hand at banks 3,974,915
accounts receivable, net 2,678,482
other current assets 2,009,267
inventory 1,338,526
trading investments -
total current assets 10,001,190
available for sale investments 4,837,888
projects in progress 4,552,017
fixed assets(property and equipment) 200,004,379
total assets 219,395,474
current liabilities
due to banks 880,018
current portion of long term loans 17,138,690
current portion of long t term notes payable -
short term bond -
accounts payable 2,868,286
other current laibilities 5,316,878
total current liabilities 26,203,872
long term loans 30,254,463
long term bonds 20,000,000
other long term liabilities 8,798,358
long term notes payable 2,500,000
defferred tax liabilities -
total liabilities 87,756,693
minority intrest 13,476,957
shareholders' equity -
paid in capital 125,000,000
statutory reserve 344,748
voluntary reserve 689,496
cumulative change in fair value of investment 530,817
accumulated losses 7,341,603
total shareholders' equity 118,161,824
total liabilities and shareholders' equity 219,395,474
GO TO MAIN MENU==>
Consolidated Income Statement ,FOR ZARA INVESTMENT COMP
AMMAN JORDAN.
operating revenues
operating expenses
48,486,683
29,846,895
18,639,788
2,330,916
131,107
1,412,244
119,700
1,178,823
19,150,746
3,871,716
1,074,397
16,353,427
-
13,599,712
2,753,715
37,729
2,715,986
705,851
2,010,135
125,000,000
0.016
Adjustment for -
depreciation
interest expense
loss (gain) from sale of fixed assets (property and equipment)
(gain) loss from sale of investments
(gain) loss on sale of investments in subsidiaries
unrealized (gain) from trading investments
other
cash from operations before changes in assets and liabilities
- - - 1,664,397
(801,996) (1,440,965) (549,485) (2,417,500)
(8,478,621) (1,798,183) (2,677,698) (4,439,439)
- 1,440,104 - 2,816,663
(8,005,453) (1,764,290) (3,159,332) (799,243)
- - 44,707,500 -
(1,156,902) (253,362) (433,970) -
7,230,621 4,120,414 (45,281,503) (10,668,556)
(5,638,517) (5,750,833) (5,309,235) (4,084,225)
435,202 (1,883,781) (6,317,208) (14,752,781)
2004 2005
1.33 2.24
125,000,000 125,000,000
545,199 507,459
4,949,604 4,064,554
71,811 192,838
ZARA INVESTMENT COMPANY.
AMMAN JORDAN.
VERTICAL ANALYSIS
current assets -
cash on hand at banks 1.81% 2.40% 5.08%
accounts receivable, net 1.22% 1.98% 1.73%
other current assets 0.92% 0.96% 1.03%
inventory 0.61% 0.64% 0.64%
trading investments EXCLUDED
total current assets 4.56% 5.98% 8.49%
available for sale investments 2.21% 3.27% 3.82%
projects in progress 2.07% 1.32% 1.22%
fixed assets(property and equipment) 91.16% 89.43% 86.47%
total assets 100.00% 100.00% 100.00%
current liabilities
due to banks 0.40% 0.28% 0.07%
current portion of long term loans 7.81% 0.65% 1.77%
current portion of l term notes payable EXCLUDED 0.60% EXCLUDED
short term bond EXCLUDED 4.79% 1.48%
accounts payable 1.31% 1.23% 1.36%
other current laibilities 2.42% 2.74% 2.90%
total current liabilities 11.94% 10.30% 7.59%
long term loans 13.79% 24.03% 7.47%
long term bonds 9.12% 4.79% 25.66%
other long term liabilities 4.01% 4.21% 4.35%
long term notes payable 1.14% 0.60% EXCLUDED
defferred tax liabilities EXCLUDED
total liabilities 40.00% 43.93% 45.07%
minority intrest 6.14% 6.17% 6.37%
shareholders' equity -
paid in capital 56.97% 59.89% 61.69%
statutory reserve 0.16% 0.17% 0.17%
voluntary reserve 0.31% 0.33% 0.34%
cumulative change in fair value of investment 0.24% 0.04% 0.14%
accumulated losses 3.35% 10.45% 13.77%
total shareholders' equity 53.86% 49.90% 48.57%
total liabilities and shareholders' equity 100.00% 100.00% 100.00%
CHECK: T.ASSETS = T.LIA +T.EQUITY 0.00 0.00 0.00
BALANCED BALANCED BALANCED
T COMPANY.
ASSETS CHARTS
2.50% 0.72%
1.91% 0.70%
2.00% 0.68%
1.50% 0.66% 0.64%
0.92% 0.96% 1.03% 0.64%
1.00% 0.62% 0.61%
0.50% 0.60%
0.58%
0.00% 0.56%
2002 2003 2004 2005 2002 2003
0.10% 12.00%
0.08%
0.08% 10.00%
8.00%
0.06% 5.98%
6.00% 4.56%
0.04%
4.00%
0.02% 2.00%
0.00% 0.00%
2002 2003 2004 2005 2002 2003
total assets
fixed assets(property and equipment)
120.00%
95.00% 100.00% 100.00%
91.16% 100.00%
89.43%
90.00% 86.47% 80.00%
85.00%
80.21% 60.00%
80.00%
40.00%
75.00%
20.00%
70.00%
0.00%
2002 2003 2004 2005 2002 2003
LIABILITIES CHARTS
9.00%
7.81%
0.50% 8.00%
0.40% 7.00%
0.40%
6.00%
0.28%
0.30% 5.00%
4.00%
0.20%
3.00%
0.10% 0.07% 2.00%
0.02% 0.65%
1.00%
0.00%
0.00%
2002 2003 2004 2005 2002 2003
2.00% 3.50%
1.61% 3.00% 2.74%
1.50% 1.31% 1.36% 2.42%
1.23% 2.50%
2.00%
1.00%
1.50%
0.50% 1.00%
0.50%
0.00% 0.00%
2002 2003 2004 2005 2002 2003
1.20% 1.14%
0.10%
1.00% 0.08%
0.80%
0.60% 0.06%
0.60%
0.04%
0.40%
0.20% 0.02%
0.00% 0.00%
2002 2003 2004 2005 2002 2003
shareholders' equity -
120.00%
100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00%
100.00%
80.00%
60.00%
40.00%
20.00%
0.00%
2002 2003 2004 2005
ASSETS CHARTS
1200.00% 250.00%
1000.00% 200.00%
800.00%
150.00% 124.86%
600.00% 100.00%
100.00%
400.00%
200.00% 50.00%
0.00% 0.00%
2002 2003 2004 2005 2002 2003
350.00% 120.00%
289.96% 100.00%
300.00% 100.00%
250.00% 80.00%
200.00% 160.08% 60.39%
141.24% 60.00%
150.00% 100.00%
100.00% 40.00%
50.00% 20.00%
0.00% 0.00%
2002 2003 2004 2005 2002 2003
350.00% 120.00%
289.96% 100.00%
300.00% 100.00%
250.00% 80.00%
200.00% 160.08% 60.39%
141.24% 60.00%
150.00% 100.00%
100.00% 40.00%
50.00% 20.00%
0.00% 0.00%
2002 2003 2004 2005 2002 2003
120.00% 105.00%
100.00% 100.00%
100.00% 93.31% 87.60% 100.00%
76.27% 95.13%
80.00%
95.00%
60.00%
90.00%
40.00%
20.00% 85.00%
0.00% 80.00%
2002 2003 2004 2005 2002 2003
LIABILITIES CHARTS
120.00% 120.00%
100.00% 100.00%
100.00% 100.00%
80.00% 66.50% 80.00%
60.00% 60.00%
40.00% 40.00%
17.19%
20.00% 3.75% 20.00% 7.93%
0.00% 0.00%
2002 2003 2004 2005 2002 2003
1200.00% 1200.00%
1000.00% 1000.00%
800.00% 800.00%
600.00% 600.00%
400.00% 400.00%
200.00% 200.00%
0.00% 0.00%
2002 2003 2004 2005 2002 2003
accounts payable other current laibilit
120.00% 200.00%
100.00% 165.78%
100.00%
82.03% 150.00%
80.00%
58.68% 100.00%
60.00% 52.83% 100.00%
40.00%
50.00%
20.00%
0.00% 0.00%
2002 2003 2004 2005 2002 2003
120.00% 1200.00%
100.00%
100.00% 1000.00%
80.00% 800.00%
60.00% 50.00% 600.00%
40.00% 400.00%
20.00% 200.00%
0.00% 0.00%
0.00% 0.00%
2002 2003 2004 2005 2002 2003
long term notes payable defferred tax liab
120.00% 1200.00%
100.00%
100.00% 1000.00%
80.00% 800.00%
60.00% 50.00% 600.00%
40.00% 400.00%
20.00% 200.00%
0.00% 0.00%
0.00% 0.00%
2002 2003 2004 2005 2002 2003
shareholders' equity -
120.00% 200.00%
100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00%
100.00%
150.00%
80.00%
100.00% 100.00%
60.00% 100.00%
40.00%
50.00%
20.00%
0.00% 0.00%
2002 2003 2004 2005 2002 2003
120.00% 1000.00%
100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00%
100.00% 800.00%
80.00%
600.00%
60.00%
400.00%
40.00%
20.00% 200.00% 100.00%
15.56%
0.00% 0.00%
2002 2003 2004 2005 2002 2003
120.00% 1000.00%
100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00%
100.00% 800.00%
80.00%
600.00%
60.00%
400.00%
40.00%
20.00% 200.00% 100.00%
15.56%
0.00% 0.00%
2002 2003 2004 2005 2002 2003
105.00%
100.00%
100.00%
95.13%
95.00% 92.36%
90.00% 86.69%
85.00%
80.00%
2002 2003 2004 2005
S , BLANCE SHEET
1.98% 1.90%
1.73%
1.22%
inventory
inventory
0.70%
0.64% 0.64%
0.61%
10.14%
8.49%
5.98%
4.56%
projects in progress
projects in progress
2.28%
2.07%
1.32% 1.22%
projects in progress
projects in progress
2.28%
2.07%
1.32% 1.22%
total assets
total assets
7.81%
2.54%
1.77%
0.65%
4.79%
1.48%
short term bond
4.79%
1.48%
3.10%
2.74% 2.90%
2.42%
24.03%
13.79%
7.47% 6.95%
4.35%
4.21%
4.01%
0.09%
minority intrest
minority intrest
6.95%
6.37%
6.14% 6.17%
statutory reserve
statutory reserve
0.29%
2.40%
cumulative change in fair value of investment
2.40%
0.24% 0.14%
0.04%
55.06%
53.86%
49.90%
48.57%
%
153.97%
% 131.11% 135.04%
100.00%
%
accounts receivable, net
%
153.97%
% 131.11% 135.04%
100.00%
%
%
2002 2003 2004 2005
inventory
inventory
% 100.41%
100.00%
%
99.05%
%
% 97.11%
%
%
%
2002 2003 2004 2005
%
192.73%
% 172.05%
% 124.86%
100.00%
%
%
%
2002 2003 2004 2005
projects in progress
projects in progress
%
100.00% 95.28%
%
%
60.39% 54.24%
%
%
%
%
2002 2003 2004 2005
%
100.00% 95.28%
%
%
60.39% 54.24%
%
%
%
%
2002 2003 2004 2005
total assets
total assets
%
100.00%
%
95.13%
% 92.36%
% 86.69%
%
%
2002 2003 2004 2005
%
100.00%
%
%
%
% 28.22%
20.99%
% 7.93%
%
2002 2003 2004 2005
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
2002 2003 2004 2005
other current laibilities
%
110.60% 111.06%
% 107.67%
%
100.00%
%
%
%
2002 2003 2004 2005
%
165.78%
%
100.00%
%
50.03% 43.72%
%
%
2002 2003 2004 2005
%
100.00% 99.83% 100.09%
%
%
%
%
%
0.00%
%
2002 2003 2004 2005
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
2002 2003 2004 2005
defferred tax liabilities
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
2002 2003 2004 2005
minority intrest
minority intrest
% 100.00%
%
% 98.09%
%
%
95.58% 95.72%
%
%
%
%
2002 2003 2004 2005
statutory reserve
statutory reserve
%
159.50%
%
100.00% 100.00% 100.00%
%
%
2002 2003 2004 2005
% 860.67%
%
%
%
% 100.00% 52.63%
15.56%
%
2002 2003 2004 2005
% 860.67%
%
%
%
% 100.00% 52.63%
15.56%
%
2002 2003 2004 2005
%
100.00%
% 88.13% 83.29% 88.62%
%
%
%
%
%
2002 2003 2004 2005
GO TO MAIN MENU==>
operating revenues
operating expenses
300.97%
94.12%
13.45%
495.21%
384.80%
75.42%
-10418.39%
96.79%
-19.38%
358.44%
-19.10%
51.28%
-15.65%
100%
-15.65%
VERTICAL COMMON ANALYSIS CHARTS , INCOME STATEMENT
OPERATING REVENUES
120.00%
100.00% 100.00% 100.00%
100.00%
80.00%
60.00%
40.00%
20.00%
0.00%
2002 2003 2004
100.00% 50.00%
77.82% 73.41%
80.00% 40.00%
64.81% 61.56%
60.00% 30.00% 26.59%
22.18%
40.00% 20.00%
20.00% 10.00%
0.00% 0.00%
2002 2003 2004 2005 2002 2003
less : general and administrative expenses(wth othr exp) add : net profit from sale of aly
less : general and administrative expenses(wth othr exp) add : net profit from sale of a
3.50% 0.30%
2.91%
3.00% 0.25%
2.50% 0.20%
1.96%
2.00%
1.44% 0.15%
1.50% 1.02%
0.10%
other revenue ( other income ) change in fair value of trading
3.50% 0.30%
2.91%
3.00% 0.25%
2.50% 0.20%
1.96%
2.00%
1.44% 0.15%
1.50% 1.02%
1.00% 0.10%
0.50% 0.05%
0.00% 0.00%
2002 2003 2004 2005 2002 2003
3.00% 50.00%
2.43%
2.50% 40.00%
2.00%
30.00%
1.50% 21.45%
17.83%
20.00%
1.00%
0.50% 10.00%
0.00% 0.00%
2002 2003 2004 2005 2002 2003
net profit (loss)befor income tax minority intrest & depreciation impairment loss from inv
60.00% 10.00%
50.32% 47.99%
50.00% 0.00%
40.00% 34.96% -10.00% 2002 2003
28.05%
30.00% -20.00%
20.00% -30.00%
10.00% -40.00%
0.00% -50.00%
-50.89% -49.47%
2002 2003 2004 2005 -60.00%
0.10% 10.00%
0.08%
0.08% 0.00%
-10.00% 2002 2003
0.06%
0.04% -20.00%
0.04%
0.02% -30.00%
0.02% -40.00%
0.00% -50.00%
-50.92% -49.47%
2002 2003 2004 2005 -60.00%
6.00% 10.00%
4.93%
5.00% 0.00%
4.00% -10.00% 2002 2003
3.00% -20.00%
2.00% 1.25% 1.46% -30.00%
1.00% -40.00%
0.05%
0.00% -50.00% -45.99% -48.22%
2002 2003 2004 2005 -60.00%
OPERATING REVENUES
200.00%
146.83%
150.00% 107.48%
100.00%
100.00%
50.00%
0.00%
2002 2003 2004
less : general and administrative expenses(wth othr exp) add : net profit from sale of aly
less : general and administrative expenses(wth othr exp) add : net profit from sale of
120.00% 120.00%
100.00% 94.12% 100.00%
100.00% 87.86% 100.00%
75.07%
80.00% 80.00%
60.00% 60.00%
40.00% 40.00%
20.00% 20.00% 4.98%
0.00% 0.00%
2002 2003 2004 2005 2002 2003
less : general and administrative expenses(wth othr exp) add : net profit from sale of
120.00% 120.00%
100.00% 94.12% 100.00%
100.00% 87.86% 100.00%
75.07%
80.00% 80.00%
60.00% 60.00%
40.00% 40.00%
20.00% 20.00% 4.98%
0.00% 0.00%
2002 2003 2004 2005 2002 2003
600.00% 1200.00%
495.21%
500.00% 1000.00%
400.00% 800.00%
300.00% 600.00%
205.97% 207.56%
200.00% 400.00%
100.00%
100.00% 200.00%
0.00% 0.00%
2002 2003 2004 2005 2002 2003
1200.00% 500.00%
1000.00% 400.00%
800.00%
300.00%
600.00%
200.00% 129.36%
400.00% 100.00%
200.00% 100.00%
0.00% 0.00%
2002 2003 2004 2005 2002 2003
net profit (loss)befor income tax minority intrest & depreciation impairment loss from inv
1200.00%
2000.00% 100.00% 1000.00%
0.00% 800.00%
-2000.00% 2002 -70.46%
2003 2004 2005 600.00%
-4000.00%
net profit (loss)befor income tax minority intrest & depreciation impairment loss from inv
1200.00%
2000.00% 100.00% 1000.00%
0.00% 800.00%
-2000.00% 2002 -70.46%
2003 2004 2005 600.00%
-4000.00%
400.00%
-6000.00% -5274.56%
-8000.00% 200.00%
-10000.00% 0.00%
-12000.00% -10418.39% 2002 2003
120.00% 140.00%
100.00% 112.69%
100.00% 120.00% 100.00%
100.00%
80.00%
80.00%
60.00% 51.28% 60.00%
40.00% 27.24% 40.00%
20.00%
20.00%
1.61% 0.00%
0.00% -20.00% 2002 2003
2002 2003 2004 2005 -40.00%
120.00% 140.00%
100.00% 112.69%
100.00% 120.00% 100.00%
100.00%
80.00%
80.00%
60.00% 51.28% 60.00%
40.00% 27.24% 40.00%
20.00% 20.00%
1.61% 0.00%
0.00% -20.00% 2002 2003
2002 2003 2004 2005 -40.00%
120% 140.00%
100% 100% 100% 100% 112.69%
100% 120.00% 100.00%
100.00%
80%
80.00%
60% 60.00%
40% 40.00%
20% 20.00%
0.00%
0% -20.00% 2002 2003
2002 2003 2004 2005 -40.00%
S , INCOME STATEMENT .
TO THE HORIZONTAL
ating revenues)
100.00% 100.00%
100%
2004 2006
2005
38.44%
35.19%
26.59%
22.18%
3.49%
0.16% 0.27%
0.25%
change in fair value of trading investment
0.25%
39.50%
32.09%
21.45%
17.83%
2.39%
2.22%
1.86%
5.68%
-50.89% -49.47%
% 5.60%
%
% 2002 2003 2004 2005
% -14.79%
%
%
%
-50.92% -49.47%
%
4.15%
-45.99% -48.22%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
loss per share
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
2002 2003 2004 2005
enues)
193.00
173.66%
146.83%
2004 2005
2006
%
300.97%
% 232.90%
% 128.81%
100.00%
%
%
2002 2003 2004 2005
%
100.00%
%
%
%
%
% 13.45%
4.98%
%
2002 2003 2004 2005
add : net profit from sale of alya apartments
%
100.00%
%
%
%
%
% 13.45%
4.98%
%
2002 2003 2004 2005
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
2002 2003 2004 2005
%
384.80%
%
% 264.37%
% 129.36%
100.00%
%
%
2002 2003 2004 2005
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
2002 2003 2004 2005
%
%
%
%
impairment loss from investment
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
2002 2003 2004 2005
% 100.00% 104.49%
%
%
% 42.62%
%
%
%
% 2002 2003 2004 2005
% -19.38%
% 100.00% 104.41%
%
%
% 42.65%
%
%
%
% 2002 2003 2004 2005
-19.10%
%
%
% 112.69%
100.00%
%
%
% 47.39%
%
%
%
% 2002 2003 2004 2005
-15.65%
%
%
% 112.69%
100.00%
%
%
% 47.39%
%
%
%
% 2002 2003 2004 2005
-15.65%
%
%
% 112.69%
100.00%
%
%
% 47.39%
%
%
%
% 2002 2003 2004 2005
-15.65%
%
GO TO MAIN MENU==>
LIQUIDITY OF SHORT-TERM ASSETS RATIOS .
2002 2003
* Current Ratio=Time 0.38 0.58
more is better
This ratio indicates how mush of current liabilities are covered by current assets , * for example in 2005 eac
current liabilities can be covered by (1.39) JD from current assets .
Comments :
The current ratio increased because of the increase in current assets and decrease in current liabilities
* Current Ratio=Time
1.50
1.00
0.50
-
2002 2003 2004 2005
2002 2003
* Days' Revenues in Receivables 47.56 57.25
less is better
This ratio gives an indication of the length of time that the receivables have been outstanding at the end of
example in 2005 the company needed (31.05) days in order to collect its receivables .
Comments :
we observed that Days' operating revenues in Receivables in 2005 compared to prior years was lower desp
in revenues by (18% ) which indicate improvement in collections policies .
60.00
40.00
20.00
2002 2003 2004 2005
2002 2003
* Account Receivable Turnover 7.67 7.19
more is better
This ratio gives an indication about the number of times that the company can collect its receivables during
example the company can collect its receivables (11.85) Times during the year 2005 .
Comments :
we observed that Account Receivables Turnover in 2005 compared to prior years was higher for the same r
discussed before .
15.00
10.00
5.00
2002 2003 2004 2005
15.00
10.00
5.00
2002 2003 2004 2005
2002 2003
* Account Receivable Turnover in Days 47.56 50.75
less is better
This ratio is the same as Days' operating revenues in Receivables except using The Average gross receiva
gross receivables .
55.00
40.00
25.00
2002 2003 2004 2005
2002 2003
* Days' Revenues in Inventory 22.49 22.27
less is better
This ratio indicates the length of time it take to use inventory through operating revenues , * for example in
company needed (16.21) days from the acquisition of inventory until the realization of cash through operati
30.00
20.00
* Days' Revenues in Inventory
30.00
20.00
10.00
2002 2003 2004 2005
2002 2003
* Inventory Turnover 16.23 16.42
more is better
This ratio gives an indication about the number of times that the company can sell its inventory during the y
example in 2005 the company sold its inventory (22.73) Times during the year .
* Inventory Turnover
* Inventory Turnover
Linear (* Inventory Turnover)
25.00
20.00
15.00
2002 2003 2004 2005
2002 2003
* Inventory Turnover in Days 22.49 22.22
less is better
This ratio is the same as Days' revenues in Inventory except using The Average inventory instead of endin
30.00
20.00
10.00
2002 2003 2004 2005
2002 2003
* Acid-Test Ratio (Quick Ratio) 0.33 0.52
more is better
This ratio is the same as current ratio but its more conservative because we exclude inventory from it beca
characterized by slow moving or possibly absolute .
1.40
0.70
-
2002 2003 2004 2005
2002 2003
* Cash Ratio 0.15 0.23
more is better
This ratio indicates the immediate liquidity of the firm, So its extremely conservative because it uses only c
marketable securities .
* Cash Ratio
0.80
0.40
-
2002 2003 2004 2005
2002 2003
* Working Capital $ (16,202,682) $ (9,006,695)
more is better
Comments :
1- Working Capital for 2005 was higher because Current Assets have increased .
2- The increase in Current Assets with dencrease in Current Liabilities .
* Working Capital
$10,000,000
$5,000,000
* Working Capital
$10,000,000
$5,000,000
$-
2002 2003 2004 2005
$(5,000,000)
$(10,000,000)
$(15,000,000)
$(20,000,000)
2002 2003
* Revenues to working Capital (1.72) (2.38)
more is better
This ratio indicates the efficiency of management using the working capital to create operating revenues ,
the lower of this ratio means that operating revenues are not adequate in relation to the available working c
15.00
10.00
5.00
-
(5.00)2002 2003 2004 2005
(10.00)
(15.00)
2002 2003
* Operating Cycle 70.05 72.98
less is better
This ratio represents the period of time elapsing between the acquisition of goods and the final cash relizat
from operating revenues .
Comments :
1- In 2005 the collection policies of Receivables were improved efficiently compared to 2002 .
2- Increase in the volume of operating revenues result in a higher Inventory Turnover in Days .
* Operating Cycle
80.00
50.00
20.00
2002 2003 2004 2005
M ASSETS RATIOS .
Time)
2005
2004 2005
36.12 31.05
bles
n Receivables)
2005
2004 2005
9.36 11.85
ver
ble Turnover)
2005
2005
2004 2005
39.01 30.79
ver in Days
2005
2004 2005
17.86 16.21
n Inventory)
n Inventory)
2005
2004 2005
20.10 22.73
2005
2004 2005
18.16 16.05
he Average inventory instead of ending inventory .
y Turnover in Days)
2005
2004 2005
1.03 1.30
tio)
2005
tio )
2005
2004 2005
$ 1,829,583 $ 5,430,906
increased .
s.
04 2005
2004 2005
(11.42) 13.36
ital
o working Capital)
4 2005
ng Cycle)
2005
GO TO MAIN MENU==>
LONG-TERM DEBT-PAYING ABILITY RATIOS .
more is better
This ratio indicates how many times the earnings of the company have ability to cover its interest obligation
the year, * for example in 2005 the company's earnings were able to cover the interest obligation (1.68) time
Comments :
The increase in this ratio due to the decrease in interest expense with increase in net income before tax .
2.00
1.00
-
2002 2003 2004 2005
(1.00)
(2.00)
more is better
The result of this ratio is the same as Times Interest Earned because we didn't have any Fixed Charges.
2.00
1.00
-
2002 2003 2004 2005
(1.00)
(2.00)
less is better
This ratio indicates the percentage of Assets financed by Creditors, * for example in 2005 each one JD of as
have (37.99%) obligation .
Comments :
1- In 2005 total liabilities decreased , but greater than decrease in the total Assets .
2- In 2004 compared with 2003 the increase in this ratio because the decrease in total liabilities , but less th
decrease in total assets .
3- In 2003 compared with 2002 the increase in this ratio because the decrease in total assets and increase i
liabilities .
* Debt Ratio
46.00%
41.00%
* Debt Ratio
46.00%
41.00%
36.00%
2002 2003 2004 2005
less is better
This ratio indicates how well creditors are protected in case of insolvency, * for example in 2005 each one J
equity have (6.8996 JD) debt .
Comments :
1- In 2004 compared with 2003 the increase in this ratio because the decrease in total liabilities , but less th
decrease in shareholders' equity .
2- In 2003 compared with 2002 the increase in this ratio because the decrease in shareholders' equity and in
in total liabilities .
100.00%
80.00%
60.00%
2002 2003 2004 2005
2002 2003 2004
* Debt to Tangible Net Worth Ratio 74.27% 88.04% 92.79%
less is better
This ratio indicates how well creditors are protected in case of insolvency (Excluding Intangible Assets),
example in 2005 each one JD of equity have (6.8996 JD) debt .
Comments :
The Company didn't have any Intangible Assets which result in a same percentages as Debt/Equity Ratio .
* Debt to Tangible Net Worth Ratio Linear (* Debt to Tangible Net Worth Ratio)
100.00%
80.00%
60.00%
2002 2003 2004 2005
LITY RATIOS .
ned)
2005
2005
1.68
ave any Fixed Charges.
rage)
2005
2005
37.99%
ets .
total liabilities , but less than
2005
69.00%
2005
Worth Ratio)
2005
GO TO MAIN MENU==>
PROFITABILITY RATIOS .
more is better
This ratio gives a measure of net income JDs generated by each one JD of operating revenues, * for examp
one JD of operating revenues generate (5.60%) net income .
Comments :
1. We observe a low level for this ratio between 2002 - 2004 with a positive increase in 2005 .
2. Increase the volume of operating revenues in 2005 but less than the increase of Net Income .
30.00%
0.00%
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
-30.00%
-60.00%
more is better
This ratio measures the activity of the assets and the ability of the firm to generate operating revenues thro
the assets, in 2005 the company was able to use its assets (0.247) Times in order to generate operating reve
Comments :
0.300
0.150
0.000
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
-0.150
more is better
This ratio measures the firms ability to utilize its assets to create profits by comparing profits with the asse
the profits .
* Return On Assets
6.00%
4.00%
2.00%
0.00%
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
-2.00%
-4.00%
-6.00%
-8.00%
6.00%
4.00%
2.00%
0.00%
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
-2.00%
-4.00%
-6.00%
-8.00%
more is better
It’s the same as Return on Assets ratio - but in a different formula - to show us the most effective items in ra
4.00%
0.00%
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
-4.00%
-8.00%
more is better
This ratio gives a measure of the operational net income JDs generated by each one JD of operating revenu
in 2005 each one JD of operating revenues generate (39.50%) net income .
Comments :
This ratio is greater than Net Profit Margin ratio because we did not deduct other expenses from it like the N
Income.
50.00%
25.00%
0.00%
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
more is better
This ratio measures the activity of the operating assets and the ability of the firm to generate operating reve
use of the operating assets, in 2005 the company was able to use its operating assets (0.25) Times in order
operating revenues .
Comments :
This ratio is greater than the Total Assets Turnover ratio because we excluded the construction in progress
the dominator .
0.45
0.30
* Operating Asset Turnover
0.45
0.30
0.15
0.00
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
more is better
This ratio measures the firms ability to utilize its operating assets to create profits by comparing profits wit
generate the profits .
Comments :
This ratio is the same as Return on Total Assets except that we use operating Assets .
15%
10%
5%
0%
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
2002 2003 2004
* Dupont Return on Operating assets 2.32% 3.06% 6.48%
more is better
It’s the same as Return on operating Assets ratio - but in a different formula - to show us the most effective
16.00%
8.00%
0.00%
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
more is better
This ratio measures the firm ability to make productive use of its property, plant, and equipment by generat
revenues JDs .
Comments :
The company has used its Fixed assets more efficiently in 2005 than the previous two years to create oper
revenues .
0.400
0.300
* revenues to fixed assets
0.400
0.300
0.200
0.100
0.000
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
more is better
Comments :
From 2004 - 2005 there was no long term note payable which cause an increase in this ratio.
* Return On Investment
8.00%
0.00%
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
-8.00%
2002 2003 2004
* Return On Total Equity -10.87% -13.02% -6.01%
more is better
This ratio measures the return on both the common and preferred stockholders , for example in 2005 the re
common and preferred stocks were (1.98 %)
Comments :
We observe that Return on Total equity in 2005 compared to prior years was higher for the following reason
1- Increase the volume of operating revenues .
2-There was no Redeemable Preferred stocks.
3- Also there was an increase in Total Equity but it was less than the increase in Net Income .
10.00%
0.00%
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
-10.00%
-20.00%
more is better
This ratio measures the return to the common stockholders' ( the residual owners ) , * for example in 2005 t
common equity (1.98 %)
Comments :
The results were the same as Return on Total Equity because we did not have any Preferred Stock .
more is better
This ratio indicates how much operating revenues contribute in Gross Profit , * for example in 2005 each on
operating revenues result in (38.19%) in gross profit .
Comments :
The percentage of operating expenses from operating revenues have increase due to the increase in operat
50.00%
40.00%
30.00%
20.00%
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
Total Assets Turnover
Return On Assets
Prediction Dupont Return On Assets
2005 2006 Operating Income Margin
5.60% 12.9% Operating Assets Turnover
Return On Operating Assets
Dupont Return On Operating Assets
Revenues to Fixed Assets
Return On Investment
g revenues, * for example in 2005 each
Return On Total Equity
Return On Common Equity
Gross Profit Margin
Net Income .
2006
Prediction
2005 2006
0.247 0.294
operating revenues through the use of
generate operating revenues .
2006
Prediction
2005 2006
1.38% 3.5%
2006
2006
Prediction
2005 2006
1.38% 3.80%
set)
2006
Prediction
2005 2006
39.50% 46.9%
e JD of operating revenues, for example
argin)
2006
Prediction
2005 2006
0.25 0.31
ver)
ver)
2006
Prediction
2005 2006
9.92% 12%
ts .
ssets)
2006
perating assets)
2006
TO THE TOP ^^^
Prediction
2005 2006
0.296 0.325
ets)
ets)
2006
Prediction
2005 2006
1.61% 5.30%
this ratio.
t)
2006
t Income .
2005
1.98%
, * for example in 2005 the return on
Preferred Stock .
TO THE TOP ^^^
Prediction
2005 2006
38.44% 46%
2006
The Degree of Financial Leverage is the multiplication factor by which the net income changes as compared
change in Earnings Before Interest & Tax, for example in 2005 if Earnings Before Interest & Tax have increa
(10%) then the Net Income will increase { 10% X 2.48 } =(24.8%) .
Comments :
We observe a positive increase in the Degree of Financial Leverage in 2002,2003 and 2005 , which have a po
effect on Net Income also the Earnings per Share but in 2004 decreased .
3.00
2.50
2.00
1.50
1.00
0.50
0.00
2002 2003 2004 2005
This ratio indicates the amount of income earned on a share of common stock during the accounting perio
Comments :
It's the same as Earnings per Share in the face of the Income Statement .
0.040
0.020
-
(0.020)2002 2003 2004 2005
(0.040)
(0.060)
(0.080)
(0.100)
(0.120)
(0.140)
This ratio expresses the relationship between the market price of a share of common stock and the stock's
earnings per share, For example in 2005 market price per share equal (139.29) times the EPS.
Comments :
* Price/Earnings Ratio
150.00
100.00
50.00
-
2002 2003 2004 2005
(50.00)
* Price/Earnings Ratio Linear (* Price/Earnings Ratio)
150.00
100.00
50.00
-
2002 2003 2004 2005
(50.00)
This ratio indicates the proportion of current earnings retained for internal growth (not paid out as dividend
Comments :
In the four years the earnings retained was 100% because the company wasn't have any dividends from pro
120%
60%
0%
2002 2003 2004 2005
Comments :
In 2005 this ratio was increased due to the increase in the Stockholders' Equity.
1.00
0.80
0.60
2002 2003 2004 2005
Comments :
1- If the result of this ratio is greater than ( 1 ) that means the Market Price per share is greater than the Boo
Value per share which is better for the company .
2- Also, this means that the copmany has an efficient use of its resources, which reflected on its Stock Pric
3- Another reason can be the Speculation in Amman Stock Exchange.
4- In 2002 this ratio was low because increase in book value per share
3.00
1.75
0.50
2002 2003 2004 2005
3.00
1.75
0.50
2002 2003 2004 2005
NVESTORS .
2005
2005
0.016
2005
139.29
Ratio)
2005
Ratio)
2005
2005
100%
2005
2005
0.84
e of outstanding common stock , *
2005
2005
2.67
2005
2005
GO TO MENU==>
CASH FLOW (CF) RATIOS .
more is better
This ratio indicates a firm's ability to meet its current maturities of debt.
Comments :
1- the company it was able to meet it's debt because of the positive operating cash flow for year 2002-2005
2- In 2005 the company could cover it's current debt (3.29) times by the operating cash only .
3- In 2005 the decrease in this ratio due to the increase in current portion of long term loans .
5.00
2.50
0.00
2002 2003 2004 2005
more is better
This ratio indicates a firm's ability to cover total debt with the yearly operating cash flows.
Comments :
This ratio is the same as Operating Cash Flow / Current except it covers total debt.
* Operating Cash Flow / Total Debt Linear (* Operating Cash Flow / Total Debt)
25.00%
12.50%
0.00%
2002 2003 2004 2005
more is better
This ratio indicates the funds flow per common share outstanding.
Comments :
1- In 2005 each Common Share have been covered by (0.13) JD from the operating cash.
2- In 2003 the decrease in this ratio due to the decrease in operating cash flow in this year .
* Operating Cash Flow Per Share Linear (* Operating Cash Flow Per Share)
0.14
0.07
* Operating Cash Flow Per Share
* Operating Cash Flow Per Share Linear (* Operating Cash Flow Per Share)
0.14
0.07
-
2002 2003 2004 2005
Operating Cash Flow / Total Debt
Operating Cash Flow Per Share
2005
3.29
nd Current N-P
P)
2005
2005
22.02%
g cash flows.
debt.
bt
w / Total Debt)
2005
2005
0.13
rating cash.
w in this year .
2005
GO TO MAIN MENU==>
MULTIVARIATE MODEL .
* Because Z score of (3.1389) is greater than (2.675) in 2005, The Company is moving toward a less likely pos
regard to bankruptcy that mean the company is in a good financial position
* In 2002-2004 the z score close to bankruptcy and the company is moving toward a less likely position in reg
bankruptcy in 2005
y.
+ 0.010 E
2005
0.03
0.14
0.10
3.88
0.25
3.1389
2003 2004
5,016,918 10,301,423
4,123,982 3,511,649
0 0
12,487,408 17,206,673
6,833,118 7,744,591
186,633,104 175,213,296
2,748,788 2,468,879
189,381,892 177,682,175
0 0
208,702,418 202,633,439
2003 2004
2,574,962 2,748,879
585,238 151,268
10,000,000 3,000,000
2,609,142 3,596,717
21,494,103 15,377,090
51,404,425 15,135,349
10,000,000 52,000,000
21,664,523 21,705,848
104,563,051 104,218,287
2003 2004
125,000,000 125,000,000
125,000,000 125,000,000
125,000,000 125,000,000
344,748 344,748
689,496 689,496
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
-82,596 279,392
-21,812,281 -27,898,484
104,139,367 98,415,152
208,702,418 202,633,439
2003 2004
30,007,537 40,995,111
22,029,970 26,570,871
7,977,567 14,424,240
2,175,746 1,859,038
0 0
14,399,445 14,333,896
14,399,445 14,333,896
-8,597,624 -1,768,694
635,937 591,910
1,272,926 0
-374,965 22,137
-8,859,648 -1,198,921
5,611,030 4,877,793
-14,470,678 -6,076,714
0 9,489
0 0
0 0
-14,470,678 -6,086,203
2003 2004
3,974,915 5,016,918
4,690,074 14,761,045
-1,764,290 -3,159,332
-1,883,781 -6,317,208
5,016,918 10,301,423
2003 2004
0.33 2.37
0 0
0 0
0.83 0.79
-7 -27
0 0
0 0
1.03 1.69
26.59 35.19
-30 -3
-48 -15
-7 -3
-14 -6
50.1 51.43
49.9 48.57
-2 0
0.14 0.2
0.16 0.23
-3 22.41
0.58 1.12
-9,006,695 1,829,583
GO TO MAIN MENU==>