2/24/2018 Case Digest: Cojuangco Jr. v.

Palma

HOME LAW NOTES + PH ELECTIONS + CASE DIGESTS + TRAVEL GAMES + TOYS

LAW TECH WORLD

Law, Technology and the World

CASE DIGEST: COJUANGCO JR. V. PALMA

Published by paul on October 10, 2013 | Leave a response

Eduardo M. Cojuangco, Jr., complainant versus Atty. Leo J. Palma, respondent.
Adm. Case No. 2474    September 15, 2004

Facts:

Eduardo Cojuangco, Jr. filed with this Court the instant complaint for disbarment against
Atty. Leo J. Palma, alleging as grounds deceit, malpractice, gross misconduct in office,
violation of his oath as a lawyer and grossly immoral conduct.

Complainant was a client of Angara Concepcion Regala and Cruz Law Offices (ACCRA) and
respondent was the lawyer assigned to handle his cases. He hired respondent as his personal
counsel. Consequently, respondent’s relationship with complainant became intimate. On
June 22, without the knowledge of complainant’s family, respondent married Lisa, the
complainant’s daughter in Hongkong. Complainant came to know that, a) on the date of the
supposed marriage, respondent requested from his (complainant’s) office and airplane ticket
to and from Australia, with stop-over in Hongkong; b) respondent misrepresented himself
as bachelor in the Hongkong authorities to facilitate his marriage with Lisa; and c)
respondent was married to Elizabeth Hermosisima and has three children. Complainant
filed for the declaration of nullity of the marriage between respondent and Lisa. The
complainant contented that with the moral ascendancy of the respondent over Maria Luisa
and his misrepresentation that there was no legal impediment or prohibition to his
contracting a second marriage, respondent succeeded in inducing and beguiling her into
marrying him. Without complying with the requirements of the Philippine law that he
should first obtain a judicial declaration of nullity of his marriage to Elizabeth H. Palma and
that the “advice” of Maria Luisa’s parents should first be obtained she being only twenty-two
(22) years of age, respondent succeeded in contracting marriage with her in Hongkong in
June 22, 1992 by falsely representing himself before the Hongkong authorities that he is a
“bachelor.”

The respondent contented that “….. and that it is contrary to the natural course of things for
an immoral man to marry the woman he sincerely loves.”

http://lawtechworld.com/blog/blog/2013/10/case-digest-cojuangco-jr-v-palma/ 1/6
2/24/2018 Case Digest: Cojuangco Jr. v. Palma

Issue:

Whether or not the marriage of respondent to Ma. Luisa is void ab initio.

Held:

To this date, the records fail to disclose the outcome of this case.

Respondent admits that he married Luisa in Hongkong representing himself as a bachelor;

however, he claimed that the marriage certificate stated a condition no different from the
term “spinster” with respect to Luisa. There is no question that respondent as a lawyer well
versed in the law knew fully well that in marrying Maria Luisa he was entering into a
bigamous marriage defined and penalized under Article 349 of the Revised Penal Code.

The ringing truth in this case is that respondent married Lisa while he has a subsisting
marriage with Elizabeth Hermosisima. The Certification from the Local Civil Registrar of
Cebu City shows that he married Elizabeth on December 19, 1971 at the Cardial’s Private
Chapel, Cebu City. On the other hand, the Certificate of Marriage from the Deputy Registrar
of Marriages in Hongkong proves respondent’s subsequent marriage with Lisa on July 9,
1982. That Elizabeth was alive at the time of respondent’s second marriage was confirmed.
In particular, he made a mockery of marriage which is a sacred institution demanding
respect and dignity. His act of contracting a second marriage is contrary to honesty, justice,
decency and morality.
Respondent justified his conduct by professing he really loved Lisa and since he married her,
he cannot be charged with immorality. His reasoning shows a distorted mind and a brazen
regard on the sanctity of marriage. In such relationship, the man and woman are obliged to
live together, observe mutual respect and fidelity. How could respondent perform these
obligations to Lisa when he was previously married to Elizabeth? If he really loved her, then
the noblest thing he could have done was to walk away.

Furthermore, (not stated in the case) under Article 35 paragraph 3 of the Family Code, “a
marriage solemnized without a marriage license is void ab initio except those covered by the
preceding chapter”. Though the marriage was solemnized in Hongkong, the intrinsic validity
of the marriage is governed by the national law of the contracting parties. In the case at bar,
since both of the parties are Filipino citizens, the validity of their marriage shall be governed
by the Philippine law. Under the Philippine law, absence of the essential and formal
requisites of marriage shall make the marriage void ab initio. Their marriage was contracted
without the valid marriage license, thus, the marriage of respondent and Ma. Luisa is void ab
initio.

Filipino Amendments Accra Certificate Marriage Certificates

http://lawtechworld.com/blog/blog/2013/10/case-digest-cojuangco-jr-v-palma/ 2/6
2/24/2018 Case Digest: Cojuangco Jr. v. Palma

RELATED ARTICLES:

Case Digest: ANTONE V. Case Digest: Garcia v. Recio

BERONILLA

Case Digest: Merced v. Diez Case Digest: Garcia v. Recio

Case Digest: JUAN DULALIA, Case Digest: Garcia v. Recio

JR. v. ATTY. PABLO C. CRUZ

Share this:

Posted in Case Digest

LEAVE A REPLY

Comment

Name * Email *

Website

POST COMMENT
http://lawtechworld.com/blog/blog/2013/10/case-digest-cojuangco-jr-v-palma/ 3/6
2/24/2018 Case Digest: Cojuangco Jr. v. Palma

← PREVIOUS NEXT →

SEARCH

Law Tech World

542 likes

Like Page

Be the first of your friends to like this

POPULAR POSTS

Pokemon Revolution: How to Get to Giovanni in Silph Co Maze (25,391)

Pokemon Revolution: Eevee Mission at Game Corner Guide (15,318)
2014 Case Digest: Arigo v. Swift (8,367)
Pokemon Revolution: How to Get to Articuno in Seafoam Island (8,034)
2015 Case Digest: Diocese of Bacolod v. COMELEC (7,292)
2017 Case Digest: Estipona v. Lobrigo and People (5,840)
2014 Case Digest: Sameer Overseas Placement Agency… (5,575)
2015 Case Digest: Kalaw v. Fernandez (MR) (5,296)
Pokemon Revolution: Cinnabar Mansion Guide (5,007)
Case Digest: PCGG V SANDIGANBAYAN (4,592)

This work by Law Tech World is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0
International License.

http://lawtechworld.com/blog/blog/2013/10/case-digest-cojuangco-jr-v-palma/ 4/6
2/24/2018 Case Digest: Cojuangco Jr. v. Palma

Live Traffic Feed

A visitor from Philippines
viewed Case Digest:
GENSON v ADARLE 0 secs
A
agovisitor from Philippines viewed
"Case Digest: Cojuangco Jr. v.
Palma" 8 secs ago
A visitor from Liberty, Leyte
viewed "Civil Law Bar Exam
Answers: Partnership" 1 min ago
A visitor from Liberty, Leyte
viewed "Case Digest: CHAM v.
ATTY. PIZARRO" 10 mins ago
A visitor from Sucat, Rizal
viewed "Case Digest: Estrada v.
Escritor" 11 mins ago
A visitor from Cavite viewed
"Case Digest: MERCURY DRUG
CORPORATION and
AURMELA GANZON vs. RAUL
DEvisitor
A LEON" from
29 Mountain
mins ago View,
California viewed "Pokemon
Revolution: How to Get HM05
Flash" 29from
A visitor minsBologna,
ago Emilia-
Romagna viewed "Pokemon
Revolution: Eevee Mission at
Game Corner Guide" 38 mins ago
A visitor from Ugong Norte,
Quezon City viewed "Case
Digest: SILAHIS
INTERNATIONAL HOTEL,
INC. and PANLILIO v.SOLUTA
A visitor
et al . 482fromSCRA Milwaukee,
660 (2006)" 41
Wisconsin
mins ago viewed "Pokemon
Revolution: How To Teach
Pikachu
A visitorSurf" from 43 mins ago
Nashua New
Real-time view · Get Feedjit

Privacy Policy

http://lawtechworld.com/blog/blog/2013/10/case-digest-cojuangco-jr-v-palma/ 5/6
2/24/2018 Case Digest: Cojuangco Jr. v. Palma

Copyright © 2018 Law Tech World.

Powered by WordPress and Live Wire.

http://lawtechworld.com/blog/blog/2013/10/case-digest-cojuangco-jr-v-palma/ 6/6