Professional Documents
Culture Documents
March 2014
January 2013
3/31/2014 Footer
Agenda
• Introduction
– What is tolerance stack up
– Why tolerance stack up
– Type of tolerance stack up
– Tolerance stack up process
• Worst case Tolerance Stack Up Analysis with Plus and Minus
Tolerance and Assembly Shift
• Case Study: ST Tool
• Tolerance Stack Up Analysis with GD&T
• Case Study
What is Tolerance Stack
Up?
• A simple assembly
Worst-Case Tolerance Stack Up with Plus and minus
tolerance – Assembly Shift
• Assembly shift – represents the amount that parts can
move from its nominal position during the assembly due to
clearance. For example, clearance between a hole and a
fastener, and hole and a shaft, a width and a slot etc.
• This clearance must be accounted for in tolerance stack up.
• Assembly shift is the greatest when the hole and the
fastener at their LMC. The difference represent the worst-
case assembly shift.
• Assembly shift within threaded hole is normally omitted and
assumed to be fixed as the clearance is considered
negligible compared to the subject of study.
Worst-Case Tolerance Stack Up with Plus and minus
tolerance
• Assembly shift
Worst-Case Tolerance Stack Up with Plus and minus
tolerance
• A simple assembly with assembly shift
Worst-Case Tolerance Stack Up with Plus and minus
tolerance
• A bolted assembly with assembly shift
Worst-Case Tolerance Stack Up with Plus and minus
tolerance
• A bolted assembly with assembly shift
Tolerance Stack Up Case Study: ST Tools (P134000-0021)
14
Tolerance Stack Up Case Study: ST Tools
Step 1: Determine the subject of study for feature 1
To ensure lock ring to be in the groove of casing hanger
body once the ST tool lands on Casing Hanger
ST tool
lands on
Casing
Hanger
15
Tolerance Stack Up Case Study: ST Tools
Step 1: Determine the subject of study
2 Conditions:
1. Point G on Lock Ring must be to the left of Point B on Casing
Hanger i.e. determine the Gap G-B.
2. Point H on Lock Ring must be to the left of Point C on Casing
Hanger i.e. determine the Gap C-H LANDING SHOULDER
Casing Hanger
C H B
G
16
Tolerance Stack Up Case Study: ST Tools
Step 2 & 3: Identify all the parts and dimensions that
form a loop and contribute to subject of study and
convert all tolerance to equal bilateral
Parts Involved
Casing Hanger
17
Tolerance Stack Up Case Study: ST Tools
18
Tolerance Stack Up Case Study: ST Tools
Step 2 & 3: Identify all the parts and dimensions contribute to subject of
study and convert all tolerance to equal bilateral
CH3
X.XXX ± 0.005
10.650
CH1
(13.74 - 13.0425)/2 ± (0.015+(13.045-13.040))/2
CH2 0.34875 ± 0.00875
6.36 ± 0.015
45o 2 x 45o
C
CH1 B
19
Tolerance Stack Up Case Study: ST Tools
20
Tolerance Stack Up Case Study: ST Tools
Step 2 & 3: Identify all the parts and dimensions contribute to
subject of study and convert all tolerance to equal bilateral
IB2
22.87 ± 0.015 IB1
1.600 ± 0.005
IB3
17.25 ± 0.015
Inner Body
Tolerance Stack Up Case Study: ST Tools
LOCK Ring
1105DU2006364
22
1.80 ± 0.015
LR2
H G Tolerance Stack Up
Case Study: ST Tools
LR3 (12.810 - 12.34)/2 ± 0.005*2
0.235 ± 0.01 (12.810 - 12.20)/2 ± 0.005*2
0.305 ± 0.01 LR1
Step 2 & 3:
Identify all the ∅12.34 ∅12.20
parts and
dimensions
contribute to ∅12.810
subject of study
and convert all
tolerance to
equal bilateral
Assumption:
No angular
tolerance for 45°
23
Tolerance Stack Up Case Study: ST Tools
Step 4: Loop Analysis Gap G-B IB1
CH3
CH2 CH1
Casing Hanger
B #
G
Inner Body LR1
IB3
IB2
CH3
CH2
CH4
IB3
IB2
Find the max and min gap between the end of the male coupler and
the crevice of the female coupler when the male coupler is securely
bolted using tolerance stack up analysis
28
Tolerance Stack Up Exercise:
MQC Couplers Tolerance Stack Up Analysis
MQC Plate Female Coupler
DWG-0212241-001 DWG-0214703-001
Male Coupler
DWG-0214703-001
Coupler Plate
DWG-0212243-001
29
Worst-Case Tolerance Stack Up with GD&T
• Parts and assemblies that have been properly
dimensioned and toleranced with GD&T must also
be converted to equal bi-lateral tolerances before a
tolerance stack up can be completed.
• Care must be taken when converting the geometric
tolerance to ± equal bi-lateral tolerance as the
material condition modifier (MMC,LMC,RFS) must be
considered.
• This session will concentrate on RFS only.
Worst-Case Tolerance Stack Up with GD&T
• Converting the geometric tolerance to ± equal bi-lateral
tolerance.
– Determine worst case Outer Boundary and Inner
Boundary
– Boundaries are generated by the collective effects of
size and geometric tolerances.
Hole
Tolerance Zone
Inner Boundary
Outer Boundary
Center Point
Video 1 : Boundary
THE IB;OB FOR THE RFS CONCEPT This is applicable
Alternative method
0.495±0.005
for RFS only!
±0.010 For external feature
±0.015 WCIB= LMC - GT
WCOB=MMC+GT
Bi-Equal Tolerance:
(WCOB+WCIB)/2 , ± (WCOB-WCIB)/2
(CONTINUES)
Bi-Equal Tolerance : (0.51+0.48)/2, ± (0.51-0.48)/2
=> 0.495 ± 0.015
THE IB;OB; FOR THE RFS CONCEPT This is applicable
Alternate Method for RFS only!
0.505±0.005 For internal feature
±0.010 WCIB= MMC - GT
±0.015 WCOB=LMC+GT
Bi-Equal Tolerance:
(WCOB+WCIB)/2 ± (WCOB-WCIB)/2
Convert GD&T to
Bi-Equal Lateral:
6±2
Note: MMC modifier for the holes (x4) allow more tolerance (Bonus
tolerance), thus resulting in bigger tolerance range.