Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Abstract—This paper suggests the 3-DOF PID Controller with species typical reactions to environmental changes (Damasio,
emotion function and tuning approach. The PID controller has 1994; Sloman, 2003). So, the emotion technology should
been widely used owing to its simplicity and robustness in study for coming technology. That is, emotion technology
various systems. However, the classical PID controller cannot will be used in various IT technology or design. Neural,
both function such as set-point following and disturbance. To neuro-fuzzy and evolutionary system and their derivatives
recover, the 2-DOF (Two-Degree Of Freedom) controller with followed later. Recently, biological information processing
a 2-DOF (Two-Degree Of Freedom) function controller which systems such as human beings have many interesting
has both set point-following function and disturbance-rejecting functions and are expected to provide various feasible ideas
function, at the same time has been suggested. On the other
to engineering fields [10]. Biological information such as
hand, emotion function is an important role in human being.
However, many researchers have been dealing its structure
immune system in living organisms can be mainly classified
and modeling. Herein, this paper suggests novel 3-DOF-EI-PID into the following four systems: brain nervous, genetic
controller with emotion function(3-DOF-EI-PID: 3-Degree Of system, endocrine system. Also, they are the important for
Freedom-Emotion Intelligent-PID). Also, this paper suggests artificial intelligence. This paper suggests the scheme and
tuning technique of the 3-DOF-EI-PID controller by immune tuning approach of 3-DOF Emotion Intelligent PID
algorithm. controller (3-DOF- EI-PID).
90% of all control systems are PID type [1,2,3]. Also, owing 1 1 K p K d s
to their popularity in the industrial world, several approaches K p 1
PV ( s) Ti s
1 Ti s
1
Td s
s
Eout (t 1) Eold
s
(t 1) Enew
s
(t ) (4a)
2 1 0.5 0.2 0.1
/ new (t ) exp( L) (4b)
s
Eold
75
71
2 1 0.5 0.2 0.12 Llim
n
: limit speed in PID gain
Tuning algorithm is those emotional parameters do well in
2 1 0.5 0.2 0.1 system.
[step 1] Initialization and recognition of antigen: The
Figure 4. Allocation structure of , , gain in antibody. immune system recognizes the invasion of an antigen, which
corresponds to input data or disturbances in the optimization
On the other hand, the k locus of antibody 2 represents problem.
gain for tuning of the 2-DOF PID controller. Here, the [step 2] Product of antibody from memory cell: The immune
objective function can be written as follows. system produces the antibodies that were effective to kill the
antigen in the past. This is implemented by recalling a past
successful solution from memory cell.
i Ln Lobject f n
z
2
n (6) [step 3] Calculation for searching a optimal solution.
n1 [step 4] Differentiation of lymphocyte: The B - lymphocyte
R I
P cell, the antibody that matched the antigen, is dispersed to
Ln i i ,n the memory cells in order to respond to the next invasion
i 1
quickly.
0 : Ln Llim it
[step 5] Stimulation and suppression of antibody: The
fn n
expected value
k of the stimulation of the antibody is given
1 : Otherwise
where, i : objective function by
: the number of processes for obtaining an optimal PID m
z !k
(7)
gain k "
k
L : optimal level in process for selection of an optimal gain
n where " k is the concentration of the antibodies and is
object
L
n
: target optimal value in process for selection of an represented by
sum of antibodies with same affinity as m! k
optimal gain " k = "k (8)
: penalty constant sumof antibodies
f
n
: penalty function
[step 6] Stimulation of Antibody: To capture the unknown
P : the number of route for selection of an optimal gain antigen, new lymphocytes are produced in the bone marrow
R : gain level in route i in place of the antibody eliminated in step 5.
i
I
i, n
: subsidiary function
,QLWLDOYDOXH K p , Ki , Kd , , , ,
⁎Ⱂ
,0
K p , K i , K d , ,
B
69 1 T1 s
⁎Ⱂ
1
1 T2 s K p 1
*V
B Ti s
⁎Ⱂ
⁎Ⱂ
K p Td s
1
Td s
⁎Ⱂ
⁎Ⱂ
Figure 5. Immune based tuning of the 3-DOF-EI-PID controller with emotion function
76
72
IV. SIMULATION AND DISCUSSION V. CONCLUSIONS
Table 1 the comparison of tuning results in 3-DOF-EI-PID The PID controller has been using in many areas. Also,
shows in Table 1. Table 1 expresses immune based tuning is approach for achieving an optimal PID gain is wide and
close to best solution. The mechanism of emotion function is various in many tools such as, Z-N, fuzzy, NN-fuzzy, GA etc.
biologically very complicated. That is, when the emotional The modified 2 - DOF PID controller is designed by
intensity of a B-function crosses a threshold it gets excited rearranging the 2 - degrees parameter to enable parameters of
and transmits messages that suppress or stimulate other controller to fit into the industrial areas. The emotion
segment activity. function is an important role in human being decision-
making. Recently, that area is emerging technology. Herein,
this paper suggests approach for application emotion in
industrial control and the other IT technology. For this
purpose, we suggest an immune algorithm based tuning
method for the 3-DOF-EI-PID controller. Parameters P, I
and D encoded in antibody are randomly allocated during
selection processes to obtain an optimal gain for 3-DOF-EI-
PID controller. The suggested controller can also be
experimented for effectively in the system.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
This research was supported by Basic Science Research
Program through the National Research Foundation of
Korea(NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education, Science
Figure 6. Simulated result with emotion function. and Technology(2012R1A1A2042098).
Tuning Methods Response [1] C. H. Lee and C. C. Teng, “A Novel Robust PID Controllers Design
Item Kp by Fuzzy Neural Network,” Asian Journal of Control, Vol. 4, No. 4,
Ti Td tr ts OV
pp. 433-438, 2002.
Z-N- [2] [J. X. Xu, Y. M. Pok, C. Liu, and C. C. Hang, “Tuning and Analysis
34.30 0.27 0.08 0.0774 1.2356 63.2
PID of a Fuzzy PI Controller Based on Gain and Phase Margins,” IEEE
PI 23.23 0.38 - 0.1299 2.338 77.2 Trans. on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics- Part A: Systems and
ISTE- Humans, Vol. 28, No. 5, pp. 685-691, 1998.
40.86 7.53 0.04 0.1441 4.7563 6.8
PID [3] Kraus, T.W., &Mayron, T.J, “Self-tuning PID controllers based on a
8.04 pattern recognition approach,” Control Engineering Practice, 106–111,
PI 11.90 - 0.1605 1.6713 18.6
4 1984.
21.6 [4] Hang, C. C., W. K. Ho and L. S. Cao, “A comparison of two design
IM 33.85 0.08 0.0263 2.4402 9.3
7 methods for PID controllers,” ISA Trans., 33, 147-151, 1994.
[5] Zhuang, M. and D. P. Atherton, “Automatic tuning of optimum PID
The messages on reaching other B-function territories controllers,” IEE Proc. Part D, 14, 216-224, 1993.
stimulate or inhibit them, creating a positive or negative [6] C. H. Lee and C. C. Teng, “Tuning PID Controller of Unstable
effect on the current emotion of the B-function. These Processes: A Fuzzy Neural Network Approach,” Fuzzy Sets and
messages form metaphors for biological neurotransmitters. Systems, Vol. 128, No.1, pp. 95-106, 2002.
They also have a life-time stamped on them by their creators [7] Dong Hwa Kim, “Tuning of a PID controller using a artificial
at the time when they emanate, which is proportional to the immune network model and fuzzy set” IFSA, July 28, Vancouver.
change in the associated emotion intensity. The messages [8] Dong Hwa Kim, “Intelligent Tuning of the 2-DOF PID Controller On
the DCS for Steam Temperature Control of Thermal Power Plant,”
can be either stimulate or suppress the B-function onto IEEE Industrial Application Society. I&CPS 2002, May 5 - 8, 2002,
whose territory they are sent. The decision as to which B- Savannah, GA, USA.
function to stimulate and which to suppress has been made [9] Valentin Lungu, “Artificial emotion simulation model,”
by intuitively classifying the affection of other emotions on a http://aimas.cs.pub.ro/people/valentin.lung.
basic emotion, as positive or negative. It is also proportional [10] Dong Hwa Kim. “Tuning of 2 - DOF PID controller by immune
to the input intensity to that B-agent among other factors algorithm," IEEE international conference on evolutionary
discussed later. computation, Hawaii, May 12 - 17, 2002.
77
73