ShowTransactionImageFile PDF

STATE OF TEXAS Ve.
No.
OffenN
FILED� 09/06/96 AAA�STE0: OR/27/o�
1. �A..A"""'q..J.�.A::1,,�'l,..L..�--------+�--
CRIMINAL DOCKET 2. ----------
Right
Thumb Print 3. ------------
Appeals Attorney ___________________.
�&»� oc�r_;-�l0---+-��.L£J:t:l.�'A-��LZE.��___:
��ML�
fw�d�
I� � N�0V�::....:1=
l3 998��
Thomas A. Wilder
DISTRICT CLERK
TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS
AL DIIITRICT c;ouRT PAPER• AND MUaT NOT •• REMOVED
CRIMINAL DOCKET
DEC 2 11998 DISMISSED ON MCYnON OF ura STATE, VOLdiJPO. .!:i1.-9
-,iisibfii .1M, jffiib i,fMfcf W ....�

DODD
NAME OFFENSE
r11t,O'( POIJl tl'-10: t,M l I Of 111tH Olll
ADDRESS [HlJ, I I'll IH 11 � I DATE 0•1 1 1 ',IQ
I 1)ft T l.ll)R Ill I'< I. P,
RACE 1, SEX fl AGE 'U DOB i , 10 l'I'� C. C.
CASE NO. p/, � 1 tlll(l FILED: (DATE) AGENCY I fJP f I.JflfllH 1 11 1
t·t llftS .. I U !)f 1fi!�1WI n

TRANSFER, 11 s130JJW DATE
COMPLA,INT NO. •J.,·,rnt;•�,

IN THE NAME AND BY AUTHOUTY OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:
Before me, the undersigned Assistant District Auorr.ey of Tarrar.t
County, Texas, this dav personally appeared the undersigned affiant,
who upon his oath �ays that he has good reason to be!ieve and does
believe that in t!1e County of Tarrant and State of Texas ** * * ** if * *
hereinafter called Defendant, in the County of
Tarrant and State afor-said, on or about the 1 ,, fll day of n,,, 19 iO, did
llff I ♦ •illl'I l Ill rt. JIH OH JOllAI I 'I' r /\Uh[ I llf Ill (!I II ,.. Ari 114M V H>IIAI . 1:-(,f<t F l>WMI>�. lt,
'"1llltlll Wt Ill 11 IJr fH fi Ot-'i'10l Y Wf11f'l1N. l(J �fl I /'I I lPI ,.J/K. (t ll\) !Hf '1fi I() Ol.H tl(>Af!)
11.-,•, tit(,. (,lft' 111\.lf( Jt! rtlF I lll•�•..r 11r Ll)l\i1l l I w, Ufl ()TlfttPt lit!, 'l(J 1.Uf'INJ1 HI{
fltt- or r ·t,�£ nr 1wri�1no. nr liAHl t' t>-�-'�11 ...
Filed (Clerk•• use only)
PEACE AND DIONITY OF THE STATE.
�"'¼- �.��-
dff o._f!'"'.i -,._=.=---��
att
r:E R TIF ICA TE OF PR OCEE DINGS
C.ASE: r.ib3t888 DOCI E·I': CID: (!Jl5937
OEFl!''J!)ANf: i:. □ E I NS□ r.J, ROBb'I t�pf;·RANT: 1),!,31888

l"'lCRO: INDlCTEl.'I: DC\TE: I I
1:0URTi D3 2 TRANSFE.: COURT:
CH0V: I I 1 Q: r.ouNTY:
O1SP06IT1CN OFFENSEt --- - ---------------

DlSf I _/_ CT COST:
__,_/ __
S!:N1E'llCE: S\/Etlf: !1 I SC:
,_, A�l)UNT: PAID:
FORFClT: ,_,_
------ _______...u,__:__..
!<FC MMD 5000()0. 00
0li3iA8fl
31� DTSTRJCT COURT
THE STATE OF TEXAS
COUNTY OF TARRANT No. 063188B
F [J
TARR• OUNi�
TO ANY PEACE OFFICl::R OF THE
STATE OF TE�AS, GREETINGS: TARRANT COUNTY
'96 SEP 10 P 1 :03
�ARRANT
You are hereby commanded to take the body oT
R(l[<BY ROB IN.'."DN TH6ffi\!.J'im 'illl 1!!�

OISTRlt 1 1,LE111{
keep, sci that you have him bo!fore the Honorable THE STATE OF TEXAS
vs.
17� DlSlR1r1 rOURT , in and for ROHDY f{OBlNSON
8861 AURll n
Tarrant County, at the Court House thereof, FORT WORTII TX 12'069 BM
in the City c,f Fort Worth, instanter, to answer Issued the 06THday of
the State of Te>cas on a chargt by IMMJ.KIWMtt( of
(x:»IPLAI NT SEPTl::HBEt- 19 96
CAF'I fAL HURDEf�
2
'l
issued under my hand and seal of office

in the City of Fort Worth, Tl'xas
r SEF'fF::MBF� 19 9t-,
lHOHt.S A. WlLDfR
Arrest ......... $ ____
Mileage ......... _____
Miscellaneous ... ____
SEP O 9 1996
Total ...•.... .
FORM 0. C. 265·C R
0'°tl61..:)t\L
OFFlCER'S RETIJRN
iftCo,
at o'clock M.,
e ll
�
• ,
, 19� al ___ o'doc:k __M., :J
TARR �tlR·
_
11lf3�
_..,._..._injail• =rue: �
I ....a, wl IICCltSUl'ily tra'1dcd ___ ulilcs in tit.! scrw:c ol this Writ, in addili<m to any
'96 3J1LWQ 8)1$lJ.C. COURT
uw:
odler mi1ea1J1c I may scmc:e
traYclcd ill lhc ol O!hcr proccs.s in lhis cause during lhc same trip.
THO�,,;:, ,. .i.11 .1ER
1
.c.J.i, RI - CU:. �
rnm��m
FEES: Matiag annt s__
Milugc s__ ')
Ct,mmitmcal s__
TOTAL s__
m &mm��,r
DAVID WlLUAMS, SHERIFF
FOR
Defendant
Byc9.S - Cot,y ' De puty
THE STATE OF TEXAS
vs.
ROBBY ROBINSON
�
t f -' r--
NI
..�
r
THE STATE OF TEXAS
TO DAVID WILLIAMS, SHERIFF OF TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, GREETINGS:
On this day, September 9, 1996, it appearing to the Court that there is now pending on
the docket of this Court, a certain case entitled the STATE OF TEXAS vs. ROBBY ROBINSON.
being Cau:;e No. 0631888, where said defendant is charged with the offense of CAPITAL
MURDER;and
WHEREAS, it further appearing to tlie C.lurt, that Defendant, ROBBY ROBINSON, (B/M
DOB: 12-10-69) is now confined in DENTON COUNTY JAJL, DENTON, TEXAS, and that,
therefore, a necessity exists for the issuance of a Bench Warrant for said Defendant, ROBBY
ROBINSON;
THEREFORE, it is ordered by the Court that the issu.ince of a Bench Warrant for the said
Defendant, ROBBY ROBINSON be and is hereby granted, and
THEREFOl<E, you the said David Williams, Sheriff of Tarrant County, Texas, are hereby
directed to call upon the proper authorities in DENTON COUNTY JAIL, DENTON, TEXAS, for
permission to take '.he body of said Def'.!ndant, ROBBY ROBINSON, and safely convey him/her
to the County Jail of Tarrant County, Texas, at Fort Worth, Texas, and that yl,u safely �eep
him/her in said jail until further orders of the Court herein are made and entered.
Due return make of thls writ on or about INSTAN1f!R, showing how you have executed
the same.
Given under my official hand and seal of said Court at Fort Worth, Texas, on this date
September 9, 1996.
r�b
�fuocE
372ND D1511UCT COURT
TARRANT COUN1Y, TEXAS
ATTESI:
THOMAS A. WILDER
Clerk d District Courts
Tarrant County, Texas
��
CASE NO. 0631888
nm STATE OF TEXAS INTIIE372ND

vs. DISTRICT COURT
ROBBY ROBINSON TARRANT COUNTY, 'IBXAS
ORDER APPOINTING COUNSEL FOR TIIE DEFENDANT
Date of Order: OCTOBER 3, 1996
On this dr,y, it being made knovm and appearing to the Court that the Ddendant
is without counsel of bis own selection to represent him herein, and that he is too pocr
to em.,ioy counsel, or give security therefor, to represent him herein and the Defendant
having requested that an attorney be appointed to represent him in the above styled an:!
numbered cause.
IT IS fflEREFORE ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED by the Court t!iat
SANTIAGO SAUN AS
a regularly licensed and practicing attorney is hereby appointed to represent the

Defendant u his attorney, ar said Attorney is hereby authorized to proceed to perfono
the d uties of the Attorney for the Defendant ls this cause.
Date
C
TIIE STATE OF TEXAS IN THE J 7�UDICIAL

vs. DISTRICT COURT
Bo h by 'fob, csn TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS
STATE'S ANNOUNCEMEi'([ OF REAJU'.
TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF SAID COURT:
NOW COMES the State of Texas in the above styled and numbered cau•. and announces
to the Court that the 31ate is ready for trial in this case.
Respectfully submiued,
TIM CURRY
CRIMlNAL DISTRICT ATIORNEY
TARRANT COUNTY.TEXAS
By. oYafa/at_
Assistant Criminal Diitrict Attorney
t-lLl:D
lHOUAsA. WlllD, DIST. Cl.EM
TNIRAHr COUNTY, TEXAS
,'DL?.J
-:·· /S��,
NOVO 719j6.
r., __'"".:...
By - .
.......
SAR.JUD
THE STATE OF TEXAS
Writ to Serve indictment
To Any Peace Officer of the State of Texas - GREETINGS:
YOU ARE HEREBY COMMANDED to immediately deliver to
the defondant, in person, in the case of the STATE OF TEXAS vs.
No. ..., c,
pending in the Criminal District Courts of Tarrant County,
the accompa'1yir>'J certified co py of Indictment in said cause.
HEREIN FAIL ,·�oT, znd mak11 due roturn hereof FORTHWITH.
WITNESS my signature and official seal on this the
day of
tl
THOMAS A. WI'� S,lerk/Qct Courts, Tarrant County, Texas
By �- / U,{ � , Deputy
OFFICER"S RETURN: (i;°" ·'' a ,c

:I�. I J � I � 90
1
:::o
Came to hand the same day issued and executed by me
-1::t
� 1 r..\ �� ...,, ,
/
on the_�0-1�- day of N��&,.19 ...1k_, by ,,.},..'"';,
_
:Bobb'-! Qub.1��,)
V
the°litlthln n1med
-
Defendant in perso,1, the within named certified copy of indict�nt in saiit c1u11.
a, · ;
� to_
.,
Returned on this the __\_\___
.. '1(,__
�
, Sheriff
, Deruty
Form O.C. 141A

._J
LL.
a.
Cl:
�
ATTORNEY-CL i; NT COrffL l CT £QlU.
11TH CIR. 1935, U.S. VS. YOUNG q82 F.2n. 991,995, Sm. CIR.
1973.
�IHEREFORE, PRrnISES CONSIDERED, DEFENDANT PR.A.YS THAT UP0/1
EXAMINATION OF THE FOREGOING MOTION THAT THE COURT GRANT THE
RELIEF SOUEHT IN THIS CAUSE.
RESPECT�ULLY SUBMITTED,
SU5SCR!BED AND SWORN TO EE�ORE ME BY THE ABOVE SIGN�D

ON THIS tia +I-. DAY OFOc±obe•( , 199.2_.
LYNNE A. DENTON
I lolOI\I Plih/,c -'�3ll�/�
�IN[ C� l[XAS
M, Comm 1,11 OB12 m
oo1
TARRANT coaNTY, T�XAS
��
. . .
. .. .
FIi Fn
TAPP \,. r· ·er�,;
0 . 1
'97 OCT 27 P4 :47
CAUSE IIUi·:BER 111 �
"••1..K
01S1 HIC f CLERK
I
Ob:31888
THE STATE Or TEX�S IN THE CRIMINAL DISTRICT
vs. COURT NUMBER l> .51l OF
� T Rabi n,gon TARRANT COUNTY TEXAS I
DECLARATION OF CONFLICT BETWEEN ATTORNEY AND CLIENT
TO THE HOilC�;.3LE �'ll%E OF SAl D COURT :

COM:S i;o1{ :;?ab,9] M�OJOn , PRO
DEFENDAiiT MID
SE
Lf:.Y.''..:N AT L!:'.L R:S?:CTrULLY MO'.':S Tr.E COURT rCR THE SUBST!TU-
T I o;v'or: ATT0?.NEY OF R:CORD �)IJ,[[JAaD SJlu., ,
PURSUANT TO
TEX�S CODE �r CRIMl�AL PROC:DURE ARilCLE 25.0�. DErENDAUT �OULD
s�o� THE CGU�T AS FOLLOWS :
{lr YOU DON'i NEED ANY OF TH� 3ELOW uJ NOT USE )
<l.) F�iLURE OF COUNSEL TO FILE MGTIONS REQUESTED BY CLIENT,

(2.) r�JLURE OF COUNSEL TO HAVE P�O SE MOTIONS HEARD,
(3.) CGVNSEL SHOWS NO INTEREST IN CASE AT HAN� A�D ONLY
S:EKS:PLEA BARGAINI�G.
14.) r�!LU�E OF COUNSEL TO REQUEST CRl�IKAL iNVESTJGATOR
FOR DEFENDANT I
(5.) FAILURE OF COUNSEL TO MEET �!iH DEFENDANT ARD/OR

A�UAJN� HIMSELF W!TH THE FACTS OF DEFENDANT'S CASE,
(5.) TOTAL BREAKDOWN OF CUMMUNICAT!ONS BETWEEN ATTORNEY
1,··II';7"'11
_..J,
AND CLIENT.
Nb1 I'; r
•pfl • -f' e-!; 1 I t 1 11 0 � ,\ N D U M I N S U P P O R T
�
J
.
�1.n1. 1 ,� r�lLrnE n1 Acc 1 1sa vo1cEs oBJErr10Ns To APPornr:: o courisEL
VJ . ,,. (,
..-:"' .,,.- -,·i,
c':.�i'\l
I ··�- c·..:ru 1 n 'l"'U'P. '" l''T
li
:;:;1"'°' ::� l.,;r._ .. ,n -' J1til�:. 11 O -u r
lil: RC�ASO"ti�h FO",; T:JC
••� D 1. SSA -
-
..,
-- r;.�•--- .-----------_.,...,._, --- -- -·-----"
=-rt
DANT (OU - '1•11 i�t,!l

i "' rv;
T,lliK
N, J .11'...L lii:-\1 .. :,l,J,,
ARECYCLEO
RDI313 y l?DBJAJSDIJ
,._
�. ;�H'-j-.
----
FILED ·:> +
nt0MM A. WILDER, 013T. Cl£AX PM -;
""'0315q3?
·-
TARRANT COUNTY, TEXA�
g
r-=- .LUt ......
JOO /I}. lAfYJAR � JAN - 9 199d 1.:J!'6
fl -,)DR.TH 1x 7t/9/p Tl/TIO _3 :31) .

r?i}p
Dip�
:;_::- THDM'1S VILJ:>£R :3 7 :)_

])JST. C.L£RK TflRRFWT
'IOI W. &1.KNAP )
f'/.. VDRT>-1 TX:. 76/Cfb
Ii .. , 1,11," .. Ill, I,., II,,., ,I II

?(,. ttY.l
C
fY1£fl7!JRANJ)Ul17 IN SUPPDRT
WJ/£Rl, AN !Wt.JJSlP VDICL5 D/3JI.C. TIDA/0 T{)
kiYPDINTlb C,['j}A./5£)__ , "171,(, T�IAL ect/l?T SJ!I.JV,(b
:LA.l!)l/IJ?£ IA/TO T/1£. �SQUj /"!JR DISSATIYAC.TLON,
7/JLL DWIAJC; !#'t>ff,4S VS. WIIJAIWR.i (/)IT 16 7 ,C:2b. 1:3� '1 L//
/ID. (IR. 198°; dS. vs. YM)J1 ,ygz;:Zt>. 991,9q5,
.j_a CJJ?. 1973,
W//atcJH, PR£/'!J&S t/Jf/Sit£R£b, JJE/Ml)/lUT --

PU'/S 77/d Ll/>t>AI flAfYlI#.AT.It>� tY m£ /!JP.£$DI-AJ4
rf!JT.IW -T71,,q-r 77a: troff ar,qAJT 7i?'£ W,U/"
S/J!l(J/11 .IAl 7711.S {',41}5£.
t(J;sp.(,t, Tl'l/li y SVIJnl.i T/"Lb, -

fell� k/4<.�..Q
WIAiMNT ?RD (3£
-.--------
LYNNE A 01-.�TON
tl<)'t)I\IPlbic
·,IA!. Of It XAS
��,__-�
1,l, C >mnt E,g 0!'22QQQJ
C AUS£ Nurn&:.R
04,:,,eea
.I)/ 771� (:R,1 fYl/,A,./1/L °'b.:ISTR.lC!,
C/:i)!(r NIJP1/3EI:. b 312
• DF
TflRR.fWT CDlJAITY; ID<.A�
])ECL�RllTIDN Of CIJUfillT B£TW££��;��l&t"""'

ATTORNEY RNp CLIENT JMJ .��;
nm._
TO Tl/£ 1/!JA/!)RABLf. JIJ/:4£ .SAip. C.,Duf{T �•- kd:@
3_·3 �
C�t11.s /JJW bMBV ;[AY K!JP,Wsr;w , PRD &
j:::£F£)Jl)AifT AN)> lAfMAAl AT,L.A� l<[SP£t:Tl-7/lLY 11{))£.S
//1£ C,Wl?T FM T/1,( &Jg5T.I T!/T.JIJAI (),r ATTDR.A1£ (
!Y Rlt!JR}) jmTlA(z!J SJLIJ,IJ,S , PllfciJA)IT 7ZJ Tl.Xlls
t}/::i- V CRJ#.IAll?L Pi,X{/)ll,f,[ ARaca Zd..!JJ/.. J;£F�A)]J
1
�i/ip S/IIJJ./ T/1,t C!JI/RT AS 17.t!.tJLJSi:
(J.) !AIL/JR£ or C,DtJA}S[,J.. 7Z> /'IL.£:, )1{); TO)/

Rll)U[,57-0 BY ClI£NT, _
(z.') iAIJ..U/lL DI' COIJA/W,_ 1� !lr4JI,[ rR!J Sl_ /YltJTLM )/,{,4Rh,
{J.) ;/JLb1/?l O/' t!)c!A!W 7l> t1a r WJ, 1 t£/M})JN7
MJ>JR //()IIJIIYT //JIJSl.JJ' WJTII 7l/{ /l/t'fS fY'
DvMl>li#! s fJSl,
W.) IOTJl 1Jlll4fjJJwAI !Y /Jl'/11/t!)J.J?!Jr1b!S Bll"1£&/ --·--;
A77�i<J/£..f Mp CI.IEAIT.
1t11 fz;
�le ,--JJL�� -�-�------
(�j�'!
- �
..
P'7 Ja.,rJ
_L NQUIR£ INTD TIIL K[JJSDIJ.S ,c'D/?.. bISSllTISF'/J�T:IDAi..,

J:'t>LLDW.l/J$ 1/lD;V//lS VS. WAINl,./R.:£$)1T 7t. 1 /. 2D, 738,
7- 1/1 11...IfL cr.Q.. 19851 ds. vs. fJDu»e l/a2 �:2D. 9�1 1 ____
S'95, 5.Tl'I t.2.R. 197:J
l;/)lm;·DR.::, P1?£.111SLS CDJJ.SZbER.ch, W£1J'Dr1).)T

P/!Jl 'Is 7Jl11 i vl!:1., EX.AHz1...iA atJJJ t>F TIIE. /'tJJ?.ErJow<4
f1DTJ!J.f rllr?T r;-1,: t.OUl'..i (JRll,VT TIie /;E:.MOV� L OF
�Ol/.)JU..L .L'N T/rES C,.qU.:!Jc..
SlJBSt.K!Blb AVJ> 81.,.JDR,'>J Tt..1 Blf'!Jl?£ 11£ BY TH€

AE/)V� SISJJE):> o,,v TJIIS £iL1L Mr' DC" ffJllt,) , 179.a_
: , o�
�l'SUC I)./ A}Jb 12)�
1/JRR.AAJT et�JNT'/ 7£ xAS
/lAJ') D/JL � SCLkS - PlE.fl /3flR.GfJ.IN.
£,XJ{IBIT B� CDU).}8£..L )/fl.S &vJ 7D &:€ Ml. Ti-lJC£
/?)JD J/1-?S NDT U.STu.i T6 flN',' t>;-- 1'1'1 E. tl.IbE.JJCl.
III.
�1/fi..lJR[ I),/:" CIYJVS,J;,L TlJ RlQIJL6T ('f?Jl1INA l IilVt:STJ<;ATDR..
,,C-!)R_ W"E)./j)f-1).}T. EXU1B TT C. � {;,!YJAJ:S[.,J.... TDL b ME
;Jlflr /l PRE-TRJ.Rc .:r;.JV.E..sr..r.(7/lT.1:JJ.i.J w&..11...b �c
..L fZ.Y.EJ.. £ VA Ai T.
_j'j_
,,,C,4JLIIJ?E. t>F Ct>LJ)./5,U 7<0 M£E. T 'v.lITI-I D£r£)J'/)AJJT
AAJb/21<.. ADU/l)JT JIIN.SEU- 'wIFI-I r/lE _r,4cr.s c,,c
DV-£N!JA,vt's Cll&. E.xdr,r2rr D: Cw1JS£L 1-!A.:s
Jv'"LISlb TD ,t:'.£1.£ f'/OiZMS O)J GRDU/JbG fie .s
✓
'vv'.4.ITI/\1(:J ON 7/-IE STitlE 1tJ Milk£ A 1V/DV€.
=:1Z:
7DTl1L I
/3RE-f/J<.:txY.•JN if C.DMMU/J. ':f/TIDAI 8�71.J�o.J
!tT7/YfW£.Y llAll> t.i.I£NJ: li/./IRIT ' : (.CU).15£, L
/1/1,S NJ€(!/. t:.C.T£ J) TO 1'1££ T WI Iti ea£Al T AFTER..
AIU/1E<.CUS K£DU£6T.
M[MORANDU/1 IN �UPPDRT
WJ/l/U!
flJJ !Jet.USil> VDTC£5 t)fi;JlCTI!JNS TO
APPDINT£) �J£.L,- T/1£ T/1.IAL eWl{T S�Oi.ll..h ___
C AUS£ NUMBER
00,3 {866 --------
1
1/1£. 8T!lT£ OF T£'/.A$ IM TIie CR.JfYIWAl b1.s,1c,c.r
-vs- <!.OUl?T NLI/Yl&R )) ,"31Z 01-
MBBy J. i?otH�LS.M T�l?I/AllT /!LJl./)J T'r', TcXFlS
Ff LED
™:llDER, Dist CUM
COOtffv,TEXq
])[(,LARJ1TI DN Df CONFLI l T MAY 2 O 1998- -i
13£ Thl[EN /1,TTORNl Y -4Al,D <!_LIEN T 11m,

By
--ro ti/£ I-IDNDRA5lE. S!.lbe£ SAID COURT :

Cor1£ NDiJ 8D88Y IAY R!JBitJ.SON, PRO SE
DLflN])ANT AN]) LA'/MAAi flT LAW, RE.SP£C.T.rV,Lf
()1QV.{$ TIil: COUR.T ,Cl>R T#;( .SU/38 T.ITUTION CJF __
/IT TORN£. y ()j' i{ECORJ) SfVJTUJ(;;Q $/iLLilA.S,
P!JRSUIINT TO Tc)(t.S CDD£ or C/?Jl-1.LAJ,4L Pl<!)C£DUR.£
!JRr.ICL£ Zt,.ot/. b£J:ENDA,AJT hlouLD .SHDW TN£ __ -J
COURT /IS l"'t>LLOt.,J$: -- _J
I
HILt11?£ .01 C,DIJ/./.5£L 7l> /to: flOT 1 o/J..s R£M£ST£1)
Bf tll£.1Jr. EXJIJBTT ,q:
CtvNs£L Jl;;s
r,4IL£J> T{)
hi£ /'1DrJ!)AJ m C!IIIJ.J..ENt� IN.'!>Jc. rM£Nr, Mor.to/J _____
l
TO SUPPR£0S £l/..Z J£)JCt:, }1DT.IDJJ 1D SUPPRW..S CDN
F"&S�VDN.
JI
UXJNSEl SNDWS AJD Il.)T£R£.S T �"/-I CA.:3£. fl T flAAJt,
•
lj1)!)1 \1111, •J IU! 10 1ql 11
,-H�I ()j l•ll! ,f '' 141 d• I·, l \7 II' 1'1'•1
llftl...,.ilii/91... I
aa&
t
IEJ!t t
TARRANT COUNTY JAIL MAI QOOt

ORDER
Bl IT J?..C:f101Bc/?.£t'> T1-1r1 T O,U rh'zS -.---- bflY
O,,C _____,/99'8. CAMl 0/\I To 13£ {!OVSI'bc:RED
TIIE r�o:vJ<:, Md T..Z.OA.I or Tdc l:Erc-'J'lYINT AJJJi
_ AFTER A 'PUJJI/R.Y f/6/lfUN(;I T/1£ <!<.J?..llcT )/J<lllvJq ---:...-�
C,oJJSzl::ic!Z6b T#c ,-,'?o 7.z-C).,(}. IT ..::z:s //2".cA'6""r�· ..;.__1
{YZbGJ<Ep -r,1,147 T,,t-lc Arof<.£811.Ib Mo r_zc,;J IC !l&l?.BY:
[ J (JRAN TE..'t>
__[� J ])£NIED
..,.....
---------------...-.....-.--.·
·---------- ------------~�--------
.r-----------..-------,-.
r
II[
No PJJ?..IDD Of' 1JN£ 11co;.-1 -r11£ EIIIU.IEST o,r Th"..r A80V,{
l)IIT,,(S /0 771-ZS l),q7"£ J.5 LXC<.l/D/lf;LE d,AJl>,€1? a.r _ s.�c. '/
3/l,IJ;> ARr. .JZA.O.Z. Ex!a&r A : Pxc.V,(,/VT:ZCJN (),,C
OPPl{E.3S.zv£ ?1rc;- 71<,IAL :z/Jc111c<!1:1<.llT.zcvJ; (I.) DE/ENhflAJ,
J-IIJS &OJ _-C;,J69JC.URATcb .r/.1 1 t4MfirVT L'DuAJ TY .T/II L
Tv✓ENTY ON£ U!.I) MDNTf/S 0/J T/1£ �R.ES&VT <YlSc/
w#.rCN L.:3 bVcR. St;VDJ {7) YG/11:..s 01- b.
lxuurr B. : �,FDJ]Yy;l/T .rs StJ/k/7-JAJf?

ANXI£.7Y /IA/]) /:fv5TRIIUD)J; (J) ;{/U/1K.RDUS (!,{XJf<..T
Wl(:I.CJI /'O,{ tl/11,{)./()vJN XcllSM Ill/Ve Ba)) cScT �,,c,;-.
\,jj.{£Rff/Jt£ • 'J>l/'Dfb!WT ffl/1',)S TIII/T TIit: :r.J.lbZC r�tcN r

/J.$flDJST HJ.11 lll:.l?_cIN BE &r /lSLDc 19Ji}) T/lltT lie '36 b:r.s-
- ---
_ Sut&,f,zfJEI;> /IA/2) .s,...� 7b BvoRe )1!: /JP T£ Aft)Vc

s��J./c]:; (j,{)Th"IS cJ.y- -1. DIJY f),t:-::Tune )918
l
---
------ -
4\W{JAl,�- �
-
LYNNE A. DENTON
MOICl�/l'\i)lic
StAI[ 6 IEYAS
- �-4RY HJ&C. :W ��-_ _..;:J
--d
My con--m bp Ot112V2001
T/lf(_MJJT ecu,4fftl, 77;MS

o CAUS[ NUMBtR
0'2J1ssa
Tl!£ S T./:/TE o;: T£./J1S FILED IN TJI£ CR.ll11NAL bi.STRlC.T
THOMAS A. WILDER. DIST. CLERK
-vs- TARRANTCOUNTY, TEXAS Cii.JRT A/1/1118ER })�71 Or'
Rol3BY J. R1JB1NSD>.J JUL -1 1998 TIIRF.flNT C/.)!J}.IT"1 Tz:XllS
Timl --��,/
�-,-.:;.oi-__ )__
j
1
MDTJDN TD D;SMis::, ::J)E; SP£fDY TRIRL ACT

--
1/) 1/1£ HDIJ0iU8LE -;TLJ])Q! OF TIII.S CtXJR..T �
R@'rJ& «otizAl:J!)JJ, ?JL) S£ ])ulNDRNT IN TH£ 11J5!JV£
C!I.US£, )1DV£.. T/1,,(, CCXJ!<.t TD � AST.D.£ ;"JI£ .IJ,f]JICTME>JT
A$AIN.ST II.IM ;./£,R.,CD/ A)I')) l)I.SC!-lllR$c 11.u'l rAb1".'.1
PR.D5£WTICW DR. R£$TJ</l£/l/t 7?IS?LUliocR t.J/Jl>�R.
P1<DVI.s1oiJ� DF Am(!_u :JZA.DZ iv- T11£ C6"tJi;: 6/'
Crtr11.rJt11tL PRDC.&DUR.£$ t>/' --r;x11s ol>DJJ T/lc /'OLLOWI/IJrq
GR.OUAlbS :
I.
S;up INP:rC..TNJ::.JJr vv4.S /'1,!..£P, Ill CouR.r C>Ai
RB-?¥>-ezi:, AAJ!> TIIE bu&VDP.NT WA-5 ARRDST£D A�
}2£r11..rAL£1) ,:Z:)J CUSTDb� FCI< -r,1-1,c o,.c-,.r&VS£ All£G£t)
.:L!v' 8f1Ib .IJJ'p..£c!TM£.).F1 L))J Ct{PTTAJ lv'/Ul?l)f" R.
- ----�-----
IL.
2, ff!£ S1/iT£. \tlAS JJDT Rx1n::d f'f>R Tl?IAL. 'w--ITHIA.I ..
1"�� W£ J///lj])R£'P TW'£NTY (!ZO) _!)AY.5 {'E 7i1/£ £ARLI£.$T {11:' &i.tb
'1'" AB[)V,(__ D,1.T£S. ---
- b/'1 -fz> s'ktfe r�em,1J e,,
CERTlFICATE OF SERVICE
I, Gregory T. Miller, hereby certify that on the 8th day of October, 1998, I have mailed or
h<llld-delivcred a true and correct copy of the foregoing motion to the Honorable Santiago Salinas,
Attorney of Record for the Defendant.
�-r.�
Gregory T. Miller
r
NOS. 0631888 A
, 0703200 A
,
0703205A & 0703209
A
Tl le s·1 ATE OF TEXA Ti IE

9
I
N
72Ni9 iJl�
S �
A 93
{ }
nm�
J
�
. OISTR l�OURt}jd,-
V -o puty,- -
S
{l
ROl3B Y ROBINSO TARR I
N A Ut , T , TEXAS
NTCO Y
{}
STATE'S NOTIC E OF INTENT TO SEEK CUMULATIV
E
OR "STACKED" SENTENCE
S
lOTHE IIONORABLEJUDGE OF SAID COUR

f:
COMES NOW the State ofTexas by an throu h e r Cr i Di A T

g m na s tr c t tt o rn e y i m Cu
cl h i l i
rry
and files with the Court this notice informin g the D fe

e n dan ta d hi
n tha t th S i
cou n
se e t e nt n
e s
l
d
ta
to seek cumulative or stacked sentences the cas e that are a ai D

i pen n st t e e e n
n s din h f d
g
g
ant.
The Defendan t has three (3) separat e C u pital M

ur d
e r in di
c m n
e
t
n
d
n in t
h
is Court an d
pe g
ts i
one (I) Murder indictment. In an effortto dis s of these ases w a l the S

c 1 out a t t e of Te x ,
as
e i h ri
po ta
throu gh the unders igne d prosecuto r, has offere a pl ea bar fo fort - (42) ears IO
g r y tw T on
d ain DC J
o
y
the less e r-includ::d offen�es of murder. The pica bai calle fo all four (4 se n bese
g r tences t o rv
ed
ain d )
concurrently . 7 //e Dt'fenda111, throug h his counse h re je ct this barga a ree• n

, as e p t.
l d l i
ea
g
n
Ihe Defendant is hereby put on \\ritten notice that the St ta doe i

e s not n te n t r o c
seu te
d
p
o
these four l4) <.a es in a sin gle criminal action and fu i nn Co

t e to as t s u rt t oc ula t eor
um
ds
lly k hi
"stac " the respective sentences that the Pefen dant re ceive s in e th fo
k
ac ho f
es e ur c s
ase
.
u
Res J)lct f llyyo
ur
s
,
R
TIM CUR Y
CRJMfNAL DISTRICT A TTORi�EY
�-r.�
As s is t ant
Gr g ry T. Mi e r,
o ll
e
C ri mi na l D bt r i
ct Att om ey
State Bar No. 14073650
CAUSE N O. 0631888A, 0703200A
,
070
3
2 0
5 ,
A
0 70 3 2 0 9 A
THE STATE OF TEXA

S § IN THE 37 2 N C
vs.
§ RIC T COU RT O F
DIS T
ROB BY ROBINS
O N
§ AR T CO T
T RAN UNY, TE X A S
0 R D I
R
BE IT REMEMBERE D th t the d t
, a on __ _ a y o
19_ , ca ■e n to be c o id ed t
he a v
i
o n s er boe a nd tore go ng M otio n tor
Leav e t o Fila Additio al M ti s Dete
n o o n by nda nt. Attar con sidera it no
f t e sam t t
o h e, i i t s e i i f
h op n o� o he c uor t t h a tth esame be:
GRANTE
D.
DENIE to hic h li t
D, w ru ng h e D at a ndant except■ •
S ET FOR HEARING ON T E d f
li ___ ay o _ _
___ _
19 _ a t _ _ o·cl ck
, _ o
SIGNE
D :
JUDGE P R SE I D ING
Tl-tis Motion is not made for purposes of delay, but that
justice i'!'.:._'ht :.,e done. Defendant would rely upon the Fourth,
Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth amendments to the Constitution of the
United States, Article I, Sections 9, 10, 13 and 19 of the
Cons titution of the State of Texas, and Articles 1. 04, 1. 05,
1.0Sl(a) and 106 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure.
WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Defendant prays that the
Court, upon good cause shown, grant to Defendant the opportunity to
file additional motion� herein.
RESPECTFULLY SUBMI'l'TED,
...t:J..
�
,r...
3311 N. Main st.
Fort Worth, Texas 76106
@
(817)625-2337
Fax I: (817) 625-2380
STATE BAR I 17536800
ATTORNEY FOR DEFENDANT
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
As Attorney of Record for Defe;,dant, I do hereby Certify that
a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing docuaent waa
this date provided to the Attorney for the State.
Date: Novellber 16, 1998
O
N .
M OTON
I -21.._
CAUSE NO. 0631888A. 07QJ20QA
,
P70J205A
.
'070
3 .l.™
TH E STAT TEXA 3 2
s
E E
7
F N
O T
S I H ND
DIST
vs .
s O RT
I CT
R
C U OF
ROBBY ROBINS T ARRAN
s C O
UN
T
ON
T
Y, TEX A
S TJ
�
XO'J'IAI 'l'O IILI IPPIT!OPI XO'J'IAI \
, I
TO TH E HONORABLE JUDC E O F SAI D COUR

T:
NOW COMES ROBB Y �CBINSON , the De fen d

a n t i the a v
boe entitled
n
and nWlbered cause , b y and thr Couns wo u l d s h o
, and w unt othe
oug h el
Court a s follows:
I
.
Defendan t i s requir ::>d, b loc a ru les and Art i c l 0

e 28 . 1 , T•••�
y l
COd e o t Cri■inal Procedure, t o til e all -

pre t r a l m o
t ons not le s s
i i
than seven (7 ) da y s befor e an y hear ing upon su c

h ■o tions. Dt1 f
enda n
t
has i· good fait h atte■ pte to tile su c -t
h pr e r al aotio n s �•
d i
a r
e
�eeae necessar y an relevan to the tria o f Defe n n t.
d a
d d t l
II
.
However, in the event that additiona l

■ a tt
er s n o w unknow n to
Defendant after the exercise o d ue dili sn c

e be
! � ap p
a re n
t,
c oae
Defendant would ask for leave ot co u rt to tile add tional
i
io n s
mo t
at a la�er date which mig ht be co n
a tr ued to v ) al
olate ru les
i
oc
and/or Article 28. ,
0l Texas Cod• ot cr i■ ina l
rocedure.
P
CAUS E N . 0631888A 0703200A 0703205A i 0703209
O . . ,
A
s
TH E STAT E O F TEXA I N 1' H E 372
S ND
vs .
s
DISTR C T CO
I UR T OF
s
ROBB Y ROBINSO TARR AN T TY
N C O
UN , T E
XAS
0 I D 8
-- -
B E I T REMEMBERE , tha t o n th e da f __
D y o _
_ _ _
_
19_ _, ca ■ e o n t o b e conaidere d th e abo an d f re in i J
v e o go g
M �t � n n
Li■in e b y Defendant . Afte r conaid e rati th i

on of � sft■ ,
e )� • �h •
f
opinio n o th e Cour t tha t Defend � n t '■ Y.o ti be
o n :
GRANTED.
DENIED t o whic h rulin th e Def

, e ndan t e x cn pt�.
g
T
SE FO R HEARIN G O N THE - - ua y o f -
- - --
19_ _ a t o'clock
,
SIGNED
:
WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, the Defendant respectfully
prays this Honorable Court grant this motion.
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,
..�.Gt
3311 N, Main St.
(817)625-2337
Fax#: (817)625-2380
STATE BAR# 17516800
CERTIFICATE OF �£RVICE
As Attorney of Record for Defendant, I 00 h�reby Certify that
a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing docUD1ent was
this date provided to the Prosecuti�n.
Date: Nov•-r 16, 199�
Atorneyfoioet�'
MOTION NO . ....l.6-
CAUSE NO, 06Jl888A, 0703200A, 0703205A. & 0703209A
THE STATE OF TEXAS s IN THE 372ND
vs. s DISTRICT COURT OF t
ROBBY ROBINSON s TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS

c,:
Tl
PlllBPNfT'S KOTIQI I LIKIII I I

(Name-Calli1, )
NOW COMES the Defendant in the above entitl�� and numtered

cause, by and through Counsel, and moves the Court as f�llows:
The Defendant r�quests the court to instruct the Prosecuting

Attot"ney and his assistants not to engage in any name-calling of
the Defendant, but rather refer to t.im only by his Christian ind
surname, the "Defendant" or the "Accused".
Movant would sho� that the use of any other name could only be
for the purpose of attaching derogatory and satirically
unflatt-.ering labels to the Defendant and same would be prejudicial
and likely to create bi as against the Defer.dant before tha jury
which would prevent him from obtaining a fair trial in violation of
the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United states
constitution, Article I, S£ctions 10 and 19 of the Texas
Constitution, and Articles L 04 and 1. 05 of the Texas Cr:.
criminal Procedure.
CAUSE NO. -0631888A. 0703200A. 0703205A. & 0703209A
THE S'fATE OF TEXAS s IN THE 372ND

vs. s DISTRICT COURT OF
0 R D B R
BE IT REMEMBERED, that on the ___ day of ________
19_, came on to be considered the above and foregoing Motion in
Limine by Defendant. After consideration of the same, it ie the
opinion of the court that Defendant's Motion be:
DENIED, to which ruling the Defendan� excepts.
GRANTED
SET For HEARING ON THE --- day of------''----
19__, at o'cloc,c
SIGNED:
JUDGE PRESIDING
ttL
�_
Santiago Salinas
3311 N. Main St.
(817)625-2337
Fax#: (817)'525-2380
STATE BAR# 17536800
A'M'ORNEY FOR DEFENDANT
A s Attorney of Record for Defendant, I do hereby Certify th��
a true and correct copy of the above and foragoing document was
this date prov ided to the Attorney for the State.
Date: November 16, 1998
At�
MOTION NO. _.n_
CAUSE NO. 0631888A, 0703200A, 0703205A, & 0703209A

DllliU>IIT'I IQTXPN XI LIMIII I H
(Reputation)
NOW COMES the Defendant in the above entitled
cac.3e, by and through his Attorney of Record, and
Court to instruct the Prosecuting Attorney, his assistants, or any
of the State's witnesses in this cause, not to allude, refer to, or
in any way bring before the jury, whether as a panel, or jury
selected to try this cause, �ny testimony regarding any information
received by the witness from any law enforcement officer, or from
any other source, outside the presence of this Defendant,
concerning any alleged general or specific act or acts of
misconduct on the part of this Defendant, or any reference to any
alleged reputation of this Defendant, during the guilt or innocence
phase of this trial, as the same wou)d constitute hearsay and would
be highly prejudic.ial and inflammatory, and no subsequent
instruction to the jury could cure the prejudicial error, and would
prevent this Defendant from receiving a fair trial, in accordance
with the Fift.h and Fourteenth Amendments to the United state■
constitutitJt1, Article I, Sectic.1s 10 and 19 of the Texas
Cons titution, and Articles 1. 04 and 1. 05 of the Texas Code of

Criminal Procedure, and all applicable laws of the United states
and the State of Texas.
r
CAUSE NO. 0631888A, 0703200A. 0703205A. & 0703209A

ROB'3Y ROBINSON s TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS
o a DB a
BE IT REMEMBERED, that on the day of ________
Limine by Defendant. After consideration of the same, it i.s the
opinion of the Court that Defendant's Motion be:
GRANTED.
DENIED, to which ruling the Defendant excepts.
Partially granted as indicated, and otherwise denied:
as to Item No. 1
as to Item No. 2
as to Item No. 3
SET FOR HEARING ON THE-�- day of ________
19_, at o'clock.
SIGNED:
JUDGE PRESIDINC
CERTlFICATE OF SERVICE
As Attorney of Record for Defendant, I do hereby Certify that
a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing document was
Attorney for Defendant

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, the Defendant herein
respectfully prays that this Honorable Court grant this Motion in
L.i.mine, and that the Str.lte be required to sub,oit any issue
reasonably related to the items listed above to the Court, outside
the presence of the jury, before the formal introduction of same,
or before any direct or indirect reference to the same before the
jury. Defendant further respectuflly prays this Motion be granted
in order to preserve his constitutional guarantees to a fair trial
and all such rights as guaranteed b}' the Fourth, Fifth, Sixth and
Fourteenth Amendments to the United Statas Constitution, Article I,
Sections 9, 10 and 19 of che Texas Constitution, and Articles 1.04,
1.05, 1.051 and 1.06 of the Texas Code of criminal Procedure.
�-
RESPECTFULLY SUBMIT'l'F.D,
3311 N. Main st.

{817)625-2337
Fax I: (817)625-2380
MOTION 1"0. _ll_
CAUSE NO. 0631888A, 0703200A, 0703205A, i 0703209A
THE STATE OF �EXAS s IN THE 372ND

vs. s DISTRICT ��URT OF
ROBBY ROBINSON s T.\RRANT COUNTY, TEXAS
'1
NQTIOll II LIKIO I a
(Confession)
NOW COMES ROBBY ROBINSON, the Defendant in the above entitlt1d

and numbered cause, by and through Counsel, and requests this
Honorable court to instruct the Prosecuting Attorney, witnesses on
behalf of the State, or any agents or representatives of the State
not to refer to, mention, infer or otherwise attempt to introduc�,
during any stage of this proceeding, the following matters without
first approaching the bench and obtaining, outside the presence of
the jury, a ruling on tho admbaibility of:
Item No. 1. Any alleged confession or statement of the

Defendant.
Item No. 2. The results of any search or seizure related
to the Prosecution in this cause.
Item No. J. Any evidence of a prior conviction, arrest
or act of misconduct.
•
ORDER SETTING HEAI\.ING PAT£
The fore<,oing motion is ordered set for per-trial hearing
pursuant to Article 2B.Ol, TEX. CODE CRIM. ?ROC. to be held on the
____ day of ________, 19 __, at __ o'clock __ .
JUDGE PRESIDING
0...F P E B
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the foregoing

Motion is hereby GRANTED DENIED on this ____ day of
______ _, 19 __ •
JUDGE PRESIDING
WHEREFORE, PRF'":ISES CONSIDERED, the Defendant reapectfully
prays thctt the court require the State to request the jury be
excused prior to seeking to present evidence the subject of this
motion and that a hearing be held outside the presence of the jury
to permit the court to determine the admissibility of such
e.v idenc&.
Respectfully submitted,
SANTIAGO SALINAS
3311 N. Main
(817) 625-2337
Fax #: (817) 625-2380
Texas Bar No. 17536800
CEBTtntATE OF SEJ!YICE
on this the 16th day or November, 1998, a t�u� �nd corrAct

copy of the above foregoing Motion '-'H hand-deiive.red/ •aUed to
the Assistant District At�orney of Tarrant County, Texas.
a_,c-�
SANTIAGO SALINAS
MOTIOr NO. _.u_
NO. 0631888A. 0703200A. 0703205A. 0703209�
STATE OF TEXAS * Iii THE 372ND
*
vs. * DISTRICT COURT UF
*
ROBBY ROBINSON * rARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS
MOTION IN LIMINE #F
(Emotional Trauma)
TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF SAID COU�T:

COMES NOW, ROBBY ROBINSON, the Defendant in the above styled
and numbered cause, by and through his �ttorney of record, SANTIAGO
SALINAS, and makes this Motion i� Limine to Restrict Evidence of
Emotional Trauma of Witnesses and �elatives of the Deceased and in
support thereof would show th� Court as tallows:
I.
The Defendant reasonably anticipates the .1tate wil 1 Bilek to

admit evidence at trial ot e110tional trauma suffered by partJ.cular
witnesses and relatives ot the deceaaed in this pa�ticular case.
The Defendant reasonably anticipates the State will i.eek th/\
admission of such evidence through direct testimony. The sole
purpose of the introduction of the testimony is to demon�tr.ate wo••
traU11Atic eJDOtional stace of mind on the part cf certain witnesses
and relatives of the deceased. Admission of s&� :, evidence would
violate DP£endant's right to d�e process an� a �aic trial under the
Texas constitution, Art. 1, Section 1�.
II.
such evidence would be irrelevant under Rules 401, 4ij2, 403
and 404 ot the TEX. RULES CRIM. EVID.
III.
Still further, such evidence would only be adJliaaible when it

has a tend•ncy to make the existence of � consequ�ntial tact aore
or less probable. Evidence concerning paycholGgical injuries and
trau-.atic i•p�ct of any witne " ,,r relative �t the injured part1
sustained as a r��ult of the ev,1nts surrounding this case does not
increase knowledge concerning the Odfendant's guilt.
CAUSE NO . .il.£..lla..88A, 0703200A, 07031,0SA, & 0703209A
THE STATE or TEXAS s IN THE 372ND

ROBBY ROBINSON s TARRAN'l' COUNTY, 1'EXJI.S
0 R D B R
BE IT REMEMBERED, that on th� ___ day of ________
19_, came. on to be considered the above �nd foregoing Motion in
Limine by Defendant. After consideration of the same, it is the
opinio,1 of the Court that Defendant's Motion be:
DENIED, to whic=h ru:, iniJ the Defendant exc.:!pts.
GRANTED
St'T FOR HEARING ON THE ___ 1.1ay of
19_, at o'clock
SIGNED:
JUDGE PRESIDING
a true and corr�ct copy of the above and foregoing document Wft•
this date provided to the Prosecution.

�$
A�torney for Defendant
( 4) Whether the person now on trial is the same person
previously convicted;
Defendant requests the granting of this motion in order to

preserve his rights to a fair trial as guaranteed by the Fifth and
Fourteenth Amendments to the United States constitution, Article I,
Sections 10 and 19 of the Texas Constitution, and Articles 1. 04 and
1. 03 of the Texas Code of criminal Procedure.
t
WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, it is respectfully requested
that this Court order the Prosecuting Attorney and/or his
assistants and/or his witnesses not to mention or allude to this
Defendant's prior convictions or any alleged violations of the law
in any manner in the presence of the jury until a hearing has been
held outside the presence of the jury and before the Court to
determine the relevant factors regarding prior convictions of this
Defendant as set forth above.
, �t��
Santiago Salinas
3311 N. Main St.
(817)625·2337
Fax#: (817)625-2380
ATTORNEY FOR DEPENDANT
MOTION NO. J..2-
CAUSE NO. 0631888A, 0703200A, 0703205A, & .0.703209A

j·-
1
T'J
DIPUQ>llT'I MQTION J¥ LtMIII II )
(Prior Convictions)
NOW COMES the Defendant in the above entitled and numbered
cause, by and through his Attorney of Record, and respectfully
requests that the court instruct the Prosecuting Attorney and/or
his assistants and/or his witnesses, not to mention, allude or
refer in any manner to any prior convictions or alleged violations
of the law by the Defendant in this cause in the presence of the
jury to determine the following:
(1) Whether the conviction involves either a felony or a

misdemeanor involving moral turpitude;
( 2) Whether the conviction has occurred at a tlme

sufficiently recent to have some bearing on the present credibility
of the witness;
(3) Whether the p.::ejudi::ial effect of impeachment will

outweigh the pr�bative relevance of the prior conviction to the
issue of er.edibility;
CAUSE NO. Q6318BBA, Q7Q32QQA, 07Q32Q5A, & 07Q32Q9A

0 RD BR
BE IT REMEMBERED, that on the ___ day of ________

19__ , came on to be considered the abova and foregoing Motion in

opinion of the Court that Defendant's Motion be:
GRANTED
SET FOR HEARING ON THE ___ day of _______
19 __ , at o'clock
SIGNED:
JUDGE PRESIDING
RESPECTFULL Y
S M T1' E ,
U BI D
tit.1£.�
3311 N. Main St.
o
Fort ) W rth, Texas
(817 625-2337
7 0
6 16
1
Fax
STATE#: B (8 I 7) b25-.!3S
17 53 6 O
A R 800
ATTORNEY FOR DEF E N AN
DT
CERTIFICATE O F SERVIC
E
As Attorne y of Record for Ce f
e nda I do here Ce tr f a t
t h
nt
, b i
y y
a true and correct cop of th9 abo v e and fo re um e
o in
do c n t wa a
y
g g
this date prov�ded to the Prosecu ti
on .

8
Attorn for De f
•� d
ant
e
y
MOTION NO. ....2.J.....
CAUSE Nv. 0631888A. 0703200A. 0701205A. & 0703209A

ROBBY -�OBINSON s TArtRANT COUNTY, TEXAS
QIIUIDAIT'I MQTrQI II Llklll ID

(Ext�aneous Offense)
NOW COMES the Defendant in the above Clntitled and numbered �
cause, by and through Counsel, and moves the Court to instruct the
?rosecuting A\':t.lrney and/or his assistants and/or his witn•,.ses
that before any evidence concerning ary extraneC\JS offense is
brought before the jury, that its ,,dmissibility t,e determined
outside the presenc6 and hearing of said jury for the reason t�at
certain evidence may not be admissible and would be highly
inflammatory. Defendant respectfully requests this Motion be
gr.anted in order to preserve his rights under the Fifth and

F�urteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution, Article I,
Sections 10 and 19 of the Texas Constitution, a,id Articles 1. 04 and
1.os o! the Texas Code of Criminal Procedur�.
WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, the Defendant prays that this
Motion be, in all tuings, granted.

CAUSE NO. 06318884.0703200A, 0703205A. & 0703209A

o a o I a
BE IT REMEMBERED, that on th& ___ day of
opinion of the Court that Defendant•o Motion be:
GRANTED
SET FOR HEARING ON THE --- day of _________ ,
19__, at o'clock
SIGNED:
JUDGE PRESIDING
As Attorney of Record fer Defendant, I do hereby Certify that
thi� rtate provided to the Attorney for the State.
Da�e: November 16, 1998
(2l
Defendant
1. 05 of the Texas Code of Criminal Pt·ocP.dure, and hereby requests
this instruction concerning the following evidence:
l. Any alleged violations of the law, which

have not resulted in a final conviction.
2. imr alleged violation of the law, which

havo not been classified as feloni�s,
or Thisdemeanor offenses involving moral
turpitude.
WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, the 08fendant pr�ys that �rior
to go!ng into a�y of the foregoing, the Prosecuting Attorney and
any m<>mber of his l.,..-u:f, and any witnesses in behalf of the Stc1te,
be instructed not. to a lludc to auch ev lde.'lce until first
appro;,ic:hj ng the t.anc>-t ar.d makir.-:, it ,mown to the \'.:0111.·,; tr.tat it is
the intent.; :-n to go into such matter,;, 01.1ts·�d"� tt.e presence and
hearing of the jury, and that t!)e Prc,pecut:.ng Attorney intends to
cf fer sn-;h proG.c, thus perau.tting the :ury '..:o be retired and th-.
evidence a1:e. objectior,=, heard ai,,d t 1 1� c,,.1rt being given an
opportunity to rule on the au;-iss:i.!,nli ':,y of the evidence b<:,fore it
is placed before the jury, thus p reventin� _o.�ejudicial error in
such cause and error whicn no instru=tion cm,ld cure.
RF.SPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,
;�/4
S1rntiago Salf;.as-
3 J ll N. Main St.
Fort Worth, T�xas 7610�
;i:17)625-2337
FaY. I (817)625-2380
STA'l'F. BA.n I 175368(•0
A1'TOP(U:;Y FOR DEFENDANT

MOTION N0. -1.Q_
CAUSE NO. 0631888A, 0701200A, 07C3205A, & 0703209A
s DISTRICT COURT OF
ROBBY ROBlNSON s TARRANT COUNTY,
PllllPIIT'I MQTIOl. II LIIJII IC
(Violationn of LawJ
NOW COMES the Def�� -�r.c in the above entitled and numbered
cause and requests the Court to instruct the Prosecuting Attorney,
h1s assi�tants, or any of the State's witnesses in this cause, not
to allude to, refer to, or in 1my way bring before the jury,
whether as a panel, or jury �elected to try this CRUse, during any
sta�e of this pro,;eeding, any of the following, arid would show the
court that to allow such testimony would be prejudicial to the
rights of the Uefendant in this cause.
This Defendant would urge the court to instruct the
Prosecuting Attorney not to refer to or allude to any of the
follow�ng without firGt approaching the bench and making known to
the Court and the attorneys for the Defendant outside the presence
and hlj&ring of tho jury that he intends t,, offer such proof, thu111
pe;:11itting the jury to be retired and the evidence anu objections
heard, and tho court to rule on the admissibility of such evi.dance
before it is placed before ·i.:he jury, thus prevent.ing prejudicial
error no subsequent inst1·uction �ould cure. The Defendant prays
this Honorable Cour:. preserve his rights under the Fifth and
Fourteenth Allendaents to the United States Ccnstitution, Article I,
Sections 10 3nd 1� of the Texas Constit�tion, �nd Articles 1,04 and
CERTIF!CATE OF SERVI.a
On this the day o: November, 1998, a true and corr�ct
copy of the above and fc,regoing Motion :-ia�, •·, · ., hand
delivared/ma!led to the Assistant District Attc•rneJ Tarrant
County, Texas.
ORDER SETTING HEARING....Dll£
Tt.e foregoing motion is ordered set for pre-trial hearing
pursuant to Article 28,0l., TEX, CODE CRIM. PROC.. to be held on the
day of _________ , 19 __ , at ___ o'clock --·
JUDGE PRES!DING
Q..B P E R
IT IS HERFBY ORDER�D , ADJUDGED AHO D!CREB.> that tha
foregoing N�tion is h�reby GRANTED DENIED on this the
day of ___.a..;..__, :?..9___ •
JUDGE PRESIDING
Defendant is entitled to have the Court rule on the
admissibility of such evidence prior to it be:· :1g offered in the
presence of the jury. To allow any tuc::ntion, al) usion or other
reference to any alleged b��tements by the accused prior to the
Court ruling on their admissibility would be unduly harmful and
prejudicial to the Defendant and could riot be cured by an
instruction to disregard, depriving Defendant of his �ights to a
fair trial and due process under the 14th Amendment to the United
Gtates constitution.
WHEREF'ORL, PREMISES CONSIDERED, De�endant respectfully prays
that the State, its attorneys and witnesses be ordered not to
mention, refer to, allude to, comment upon, suggest or otherwise
brlng before the jury, diructly or indirectly, any allegeti oral or
w£itten statements of the Defendant or any parts thereof unless and
u�til the Court h�s ruled on the admissibility of such macters. It
is further prayed tha� the Court order the State and its attorneys
to approach the bench �nd request a hearing outside the presence of
the jury prior to addressing the admissibility of tl. ·:se matters in
court. It is likewi�e prayed th&t the attorneys for the state be
ordered to advisa and inform .111 :;tate witnesses of the
restrictions and requirements of this motion.
dt@c/4:(l.1
SANTIAGO SALINAS
3311 N, Main
(817) 6i5-2337
Fax #: (817) 625-2380
MOTION 110. ....li_
NO.0631888A, 0703200A. 0703205A. & 0703209A
STATE OF TEXA.S * IN THE 372ND

*
vs. * DISTRICT C OURT OF
* �
ROBBY ROBINSON * TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS ':'1
DEFENDANT'S MOTION IN LIMINE #B

DEFENDANT'S STATEMEN� _,.

COMES NOW, ROBBY ROBINSON, the Defendant, by and through his
attorney of record, SANTIAGO SALINAS, and moves the court to order
the State. and its witnesses not to mention, refer to, allude to,
comment upon, sugg�st or otherwise bring out in the presenc� of the
jury any statements purportedly made by Defendant, whether cral or
written, electronically recorded, transcribed or otherwise
preserved unless and until the admissibility of such matters or�
first determined by the court. In support of this motion,
Defendant would show the following:
I,
Statements of an accusec\ 11·e not admissible in evidence unless

voluntarily made and obtained under circumstances complying with
Article 38.22 TEX. CODE, PROC. and state and federal constitutional
tJafeguards.
II,
The Texas Rules of Criminal Evidence likewise govern the

admissibility of statements of an accused. Prior to admitting
evidence, the admissibility of such evidence must first be
established by the offering party. Certain evidence otherwise
properly admissible is not admissible if the prejudicial effect
outweighs any probative value, RULE 403, TEX,R,CRIM,EVlD,
ORDER SETTING HEARING DATE
The foregoing motion is ordered set for pre-trial hearing

pursuant �o Article 28.01, TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. to be held on the
day cf ____ ____ , 19_, at __ o' :::lock _.
JUDGE PRESIDING
�
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED , ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the
foregoing Motion is hereby GRANTED DENIED on this the
day of ________ , 1998.
JUDGE PRESIDING
WHERE FOR E: PREh ISE S CON S IDERE D, th e
reques ts this
de fenda nt respectfull
Honorablo Cour t to grant th is Mot ion in Limin y
h3 court's ru innd�t�o
instruc t �he Prosecutio n in acr,or dance i h t e a
w t
thi s Motio . l g
n
Re spectfu ll s ubm itte

y d,
�
SANTIAGo5.WNAS
33 1 N. M
1
ai n St. 1
For t Worth, Tex a� 7� 0
8 6
( 17) 625-23J 37
Fa x #: (817 625-2380
Texa s Ba r N o. 175368 0
0
ATTORNEY FOR DEFENDAN
T
CERT;FICATE OF SEnVIC
E
On this the /t:,"{f d a be
copy y o f Nov ell r, 1998, true and corr• t

of the abo v e ar,d for egoing Moti on a ha■ been
delivered/malle to the Aaaistant D illtr t hand
ct At orney
i
d ot Tarra t
n
county, Texas.
SANTIAG O AL I
NAS
S
MOTION NO.�
NO.Q6Jl888A, 070J200A, 0703205A, & 070J2U9A
STATE OF TEXAS IN THE 372ND

vs. DISTRICT COURT OF
ROBBY ROBINSON TARRANT COUN'fY, TEXAS
MOTION IN LIMINE #A
ilUOR ACTS OF MISCONDUCT OP DEFENDANT
COMES NOW, ROBBY ROBINSON, the Defendant in tne above sty!.ed

and numbered cause by and through his attorney of record, SANTIAGO
SALINAS, and files this Motion in Limine--Prior Acts of Misconduct
of Defendant, and in support of said Motion would chow unto the
Court as follcws:
I.
The Defendant has reason to believe and does believe that �he
prosecution, in its case in chief, in rebuttal, or in punish�ent,
will attempt to introduce evidence concerning possible prior acts
of 111isconduct ori the po.rt of ROBBY ROBINSON. This evidence would
not necessarily be admissible in evidence.
II.
The Defendant would respectfully request this Honorable court
to instruct the Prosecution not to mention, allude to, nr refer to
either directly or indirectly in the presence of the jury, any
tffstimony or evidence concerning any alleged prior act of
misconduct on the part of ROBBY ROBINSON, until such tiae as the
jury is retired and a hearing is conducted outside the presence of
the jury to determine the admiasibility of any alleged prior acts
as evidence and testimony.
.c,:;BTIFICATE OF SERVI\e'.E
on this the } b ,h,day of November, '..99�, a true and correct

copy of the above and for�going Motion was hand delivered/mailed to
the Assistant District Attorney of Tarrant County, xas.
,
/jd.vrg()J-
SANTIAGO SALINAS
PBPER SETTING HEARING DATE

pursuant to Article 28,01, TEX, CODE CRIM. PROC. to be held on the
day of _________ , 19__ , at ___ o'clock __ •
JUDGE PRESIDING
oBPEB
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUOGEU AND DECREED that tho
foregoing Motion is hereby GRANTED DENIP:D on thi■ the
__ day of ·------· 19__ ,.
JUDGE PRESIDING
r
ij, Any evidence, whether written or oral, relating to the
following:
a. Any efforts or lack of effort of the Defendant tu
rehabilitate himself;
b. Expressions of remorse or lack of remorse related to the
' ,stant offense attributed to the Defendant.
The Defendant, ROBBY ROBINSON, would show the Court that the
above requested information is in the possession or control of the
state of Texas and its agents. The Defendant has no �eans with
which to obtain the il'lfc:rmation to pr 1perly prepare to defend this
case in the punishment hearing.
Texas stat.utes provide that either side may present any
relevant evidence for the jury's cor, •deration of the proper
anowers to the punishment iss�es and ma present any arguments for
or against the imposition of the death penalty. To properly
prepare and tect any evidence offered by the State in support of a
sentence of death, the Defendant must have notice in order to be
able to investigate and test the competency of said prospective
punishment evidence.
SANTIAGO SALINAS
3311 N. Main
(817) 625-2337
Fax #: (817) 625-2380
MOTION NO . .1L
NO • .Q.uJ1888A. 0703200A, 0703205A, & 97.Qrn.A
STATE OF TEXAS * IN THE 372N::>

*
vs. * DISTRICT COURT OF
*
* •-f
ROBBY ROBINSON TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS l:,
MQllON FOR DISCOVERY OF PUNISHMENT EVIDENCE
TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE Of' SAID COURT:

COMES NOW, ROBBY ROBINSO�, the Defendant in the above sty�ed
and numbered cause, by and through his atto�ney of record, SANTIAGO
SALINAS , and moves this Court to disclose the following:
1. The names of witnesses or identification of tangible
evidence related to any unadjudicated offenses which the State
intendR to offer in the punishment hearing in this c�use;
2. Copies of any documents expected to be offered in the
punishment ha.aring in tl,is cause which purport to represent or
refer tu any criminal adjudications that the State intends to offer
in the punishment hearing in this cause;
3. T!,e names and locations of any witnesses that the. state
intends to call to testify about the bad reputation and/or
character of the Defendant or for any characteristics which might
be relevant to the jury's consideration of the special issues on
punishment in this cause;
4. The names and locati-:>ns of any witnesses that might
testify in the punishment hearing in this cause regarding evidence
of the Defendant's intent to kill, attempt to kill, or
contemplation that life would be taken relative to instant offense;
s. The names and location of any expert witnesses that the
state intends co call in the punishment hearing in this cause and
a summary of the expected nature of their testimony;
6. The names and locations of any witnesses that the State
intends to call to testify about the Defendant's propensity for
violence or that he poses a continuing threat to society;
7. Any statPments, whether oral O!' written, made by or
attributed to the Defendant, and which the State intend• to offer
in the punishment phase of the trial, which reflect a deaire to
kill another or the ability to kill another;
r
CAUSE NO. 0631888A. 0703200A, 0703205A, i 0703209A

vs. s DISTHICT COUR� OF
0 R DIR
BE IT REMEMBERED, that on the ___ day ,.,f _________
19__ , came on to be considered the above �nd foregoing Motion for
Production of Information Concerning state's Witnesses. After
consideration of the same, it is the opi�ion of the Court that
Defendant's Motion be:
GRANTED.
DENIED, t� which ruling the Defendant excepts.
SET ""OR HEARING ON '1'HE ___ day of -----'-----
19__ , at ___ o'clock
SIGNED:
JUDGE P RESIDING
a true and correct copy of the above and foregoir.g document waB
this date provided t� the Attorney for the State.
3, Although local conviction records are available to the
public at large, such records would not reflect
convictions of a state's witness in jurisdictions outside
of this county;
4. To re4uire the State's attorney to obtain the so-called

"rap sheet" for each of the Stll'l:e's witnesses would not
place upon him an unreasonable burden.
WHEREFORE, Defendant respectfully prays that this Motion be,

in all things, granted.
Sant ac/o Salinas

at
3311 t:. Main
(817)625-2337
Fax #: (817) 625-2380
STATE BAR# 17�J6800
ATTORNEY FOR �!PENDANT
2. Defendant. is constitutionally entitled to know of any
offers of immunity or leniency extended to witness in
exchange for his testimony agninst Defendant and/or the
nature of any criminal ch2'rges pending against t-.lm.
Giglio� JJ.n.il.tld Stataa, 405 U.S. 150 (1972); Burkhalter
� .s.t.l..t.a, 493 S.W.2d 214 (Tex. Crim. App. 1973).
IV.
Defendant respectfully moves the court for an order directing
the State to make diligent efforts to ascertain and furnish to
Defendant, prlor to time of trial, the F.8.I. identification sheet,

or any other document or record (couonly known as a •rap sheet•)
which are obtainable from N,C.I.C. and ':'.C.I.C,, which is available
to the state and which would reveal that any pera�n called •• a
witness by the -'>tate has previously been convicted of a falony or
an offense involving :,\oral turpitude. In support of thia 1·equest,
Defendant would show that:
1. He is entitled to impeach a State's witn••• by showing

that he has been convicteJ cf a felon)' or ■iad•••anor
offense involving 110ral turpitude pursuant to Rule 609 of
the Texas Rules of cri■inal Evidence;
2. only law enforce•nt persoMel, including th• Proaec•1ting

At.torney • s Office, have legal ace••• to the so-called
• rap sheets•, which are coapil-1 by various qovernaental
kgenci•• throuihout th• &tat� and the Unit'!td States;
(b) summarized in a police or other investigative
report;
2. sa�d Statements are now within the possession, �ustody ,

o r control of the State or within the possession,
custody, or ,�ontrol of an agency of the State of Texas
and may be o�tained by the District Attorney W\th the
exercise of due uiligence;
III.
Defendant moves the court for an order directing the Distrlct

Attorney to prepare and have available for Defendant's inspection
and use at the time of trial a memorandum setting out in detail the
extent and scope of ar,y offers of immunity or promises of leniency
extended to any person called as a witness by the State and/or the
nat�re of any criminal charges pending against such person(s). In
support of this request, Defendant would show:
1. Defendant has reason to believe and does believe, that

one or more persons who will testify for the State have
been granted immunity from prosecution tor certain
offenses which could have been prosecuted by thJ State,
or have been promised leniency in exchange for their
testimony against the Defendant;
b. To deprive Defendant of the right and opportunity to
investigate the factual allegation� against him by
denying him access to the State's witnesses would be a
denial of due process of law and effective assistance of
counsel, in violation of the Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth
Amendments to the United states constitution, Article I,
Sections 10 and 19 of the Texas Constitution, and
Articles 1,04, 1,05 and l,05l{a) of the Texas Code of
Criminal Procedure,
II.
Defendant moves the court to order the District Attorney to
make available for Defendant's inspection and use at the t 1 me of
trial all statements cf p9rsons who the State intends to call as
witnesses, including those portions of any police report{s) which
contain a verbatim account or sWlllllary of any writtsn or oral
statement made by a witness in connection with the investigation of
this case, including Grand Jury testimony. !n support of this
request Def�ndant would show:
1, During its investigation of this case, the state, through
one or more of its agencies, conducted interviews with
several persons, many of whom will appear as witnesses
for the State at Defendant's trial. Durirg tho course of
said investigation, the persons interviewed gave
statements which were either:
(a) Reduced to writing and signed or acknowledged by the
person furnishing such statement, or
r
MOTION NO. _li_
CAUSE NO. 0631888A, 070J200A, 0703205A, & 0703209A

ROBBY ROBINSON (; TARRANT COUNT Y, TEXAS
�-
MOTION 101 PBQPVCTIO)I o: IIQ'OBQTIOI CONCJPN!NG ITUJ'I WIDIIIU ---,
TO THE HONORA�LE JUDGE OF SAID COURT:
NOW COMES ROBBY ROBINSON, Defendant in the above entitled and

numbered cause, by and through Counsel, and files this Motion for
Production of Information Concerning State's Witnesses, and for
saffle would show unto the Court as follows:
I.
D�fendant moves the Court for an order directing the State to

furnish Defendant with a list containing the names and addresses of
all persons the state intends to call as witnesses in the trial of
this cause. Additionally, Defendant would show:
a. In preparing the indictment herein, the District Attorney

failed to endorse thereon the names of witnesses on whose
testimony the indictlllent is based, as required by Article
20.20, Texas Code of Criminal Procedure;
on this the 16th day of November, 1998, a true and correct
copy of the above and foregoing Defendant's Motion Requesting the
J?ros13cution tc File A Hat of Physical Evidence was hand
delivered/mailed to the Assistant District Attorney of Tarrant
county, ·rexaA.
Santiago Salinas
ORDER SETTING HEARING PATE
The foregoing motion it ordered set for pre-trial hearing

pursuant to ART. 28.01, TEX.CODE.CRIM.PROC to be held on the
__day of 19__, at ____ o'cloc k ____
JUDGE PRESIDING
QBPER
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Defendant's

Motion Requesting The Prosecution to File ::. lfat of Physical
Evidence is hereby GRANTED DENIED on this day of
__________, 19 --·
JUDGE PRESIDING
III.
That such 1 ist should be furnished to the attorney of the

Defendant.
WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Defendant respectfully request
this Honorable Court to order the prosecution to designate in
writing to the Defendant where all items of physical evidence were
found as related to the above styled and numbered cause, by whom,
when and where said items of physical evidence were found, to gi.ve
an accurate description of the condition of said items of physical
evidence at the time found and to whom said items of physical
evidence were turned over prior to their introduction into evidence
in the above st.yled and numbered cause, and such list be p1·esented
to the attorneys for the Defendant prior to trial.
�(U
Santiago Salinas
3311 N. Main
(817) 625-2337
Fax# (817) 625-2380
state Bar No. 17536800
ATl'ORNEY FOR DEFENDANT
r
MOTION NO. ...J.L

NO. 06318BBA,_JJ]O�ZPPA, 0703Z05A, & 0703ZP9A
STATE OF TEXAS s IN THE 372ND
s
s
DEFENDANT'S MOTION REQUESTING THE PRQSECCTION
TO FILE A LIST OF PHYSICAL EVIDENCE
COMES NOW, ROBBY ROBINSON, Defendant, by and through his
attorney of record, SANTIAGO SALINAS, and files thh Motion
Requesting the Prosecution To File A List of Phy9ical Evidence. In
support of this motion, Defendant would respectfully show the Court
the following:
The prosecution through it various agents or agencies,

including, but not limited to the FORT WORTH POLICE DEPARTMENT aay
have accumulated tangible evidence in connection with thR above
styled and numbered cause. Article 39.14 of the TEX.CODE.CRIM.
PROC. specifically allows the Defendant the right to examine,
photograph or copy any and all ph}sical tangible evidence which the
State of Texas has in its possession.
II.
The Defendant further requests this Honorable Court to require
the prosecution to compile a complete list of all physical evidence
that it has seized and currently has in its possession at this tiaa
in connection with the investigation and prosecution of th•
Defendant in the above-styled and numbered cause.
. ; .
CAUSE NO. D631888A, 0703200A. 0703205A, , 07032Q.2A
THE STATE OF TEXAS s IN 'l'HE 372ND

vs. s DISTRIC'l' COUR'r OF
0 RD IR
BE IT REMEMBERED, that on the ___ day of

19 __ , came on to be considered the above and foregoing Motion
Requesting Notice of Prosecution's Intent to Use CertifiP-d Copie•
of Official Writte.n Instru111ents. After consideration of the same,
it is the opinion of the Court that Defrndant•s Motlon be:

GRANTED.
DENIED, to which ruling the Defendant except•.
SET FOR HEARING ON THE ___ day of
19__ , at o'clock
S"CGNED:
JUDGE PRESIDING
WHEREFORE, the Defendant respectfully prays that the Court
grant this Motion.
..�-----
3311 N, Main St.
(fil7)625-2337
Fax #: (817)625-2380
a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing doc1111ent was
MOTION NO, _ll_
CAUSE NO. 0631888A. 0703200A. 0703205A. & 0703209A

vs. s DISTRICT COURT Ot
PVDPIIT' I aw:::011 IIQQIITIIIQ IIQTI•�
IIPIICDJIOJl'I Jl'J'IIT 'fO QII CIITifIID
C:>PIII or orr1cm.. Jfal'l"1'11 JIITIQIIIT!I
NOW COMES ROBBY ROBINSON, Defenda�t in the above entitled and
numbered cause, by and through Counsel, and moves the court to
require the Prosecution to giV'.'. notice of its intent to u.;;;.s
certified copies of official written instruments, including, buc
not limited to, any certified copies of prior judgments of
convictions which the Prosecution intends to introduce as part of
the proof of the Defendant's prior criminal record at the
p�nishment hearing, or as impeachment evidence of witnesses who
testify in the Defendant's behalf, or at any phase of the trial
horein, and in support hereof, Defendant would Ahc•w the court as
follows:
I.
Unless a copy e,f such certified copies of official writ.i;en

instrumonts is delivered to the Defendant by the Prosecution, the
Defendant will be unduly surprised and disadvantaged, in violaticn
of h!s rights under the Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth ADtencblents to
the United states Constitution, Article I, Sections 10 and 19 of
the Texas con11titution, and Artkles 1,04, 1.05 and l.05l(a) of the
Texas Code of criainal Procedure.
C
CERTIFICATE Pf SERVICE
On this the 16th day of November, 1998, a true and correct

copy of the above and entitled Motion to Require Police to Maintai�
PQrsonal Notes was hand delivered/mailed to the Assistant District
Attorney o� Tarrant county, Texas.
QRDER SE'M'",,NG HEARiti�...!.rn
The foregoing 11otic-:-, it. ordered set for .,re-trial hearing

pursuant to ART. 28.01, TEX.CODE.� rtr".PROC. to be held on the
day of _________ 19 ____ , at
O'clock
JUL'GE PRESIUING
QB.[ll:R
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, A�JUt';EO AHO DECREED tiac1t the Motion to

R�quire the Pol� to Maintain Personal Notes is hereby
GRANTED DENIED on this __ day of ______ 19__
JUDGE PRESIDING
II.
There tore, in order to facilitate an orderly and timely

procedure at trial the Defendant respectfully requested this Court
to order prosecution to instruct all police and law enforcement
ag8nts to accurately maintair their personal notes and/or
record!.ngs and to have same available here in Tarrant county,
Texas, when said poli=P officers and law enfor.caaent agents are
c�lled as witness�• in th� above styled and numhered cauae.
WHEREFORE, PREMISE� CONSIDERED, Defendant reapectfully requeat

this Honor!'hle Court +:.o order the prosecution and all police
officers and law enfurce•ent agcntc �onnected with this case to
accurately and fully maintain all of their reraona� note■ and/or
recordings relative t� the inveatigat.�o:, of the charge■ in the
above atyled and nua�red cause 11r'.l to have aa■e phyaically
available and present in the courtroom �t the ti■e they are called
to teatif�• as witnaaaea in thia utter in the courthouse of Tarrant
County, Texas.
Respectful y aubaitted,
Santiago Salina•
3311 N. Nein
(817) 625-2337
Fax I (817, 625-2380
state Bar No. 175368��
..
MOTION NO. _J.J_
NO, 0631888A, 0703200A, 07QJ20SA, i 070J209A
STATE OF TEXAS s IN THE 372ND
s
s
'1QTION To BECllJlBE eo1...u:1: TO lAlH�lN fEBSPN,AL, tll:l2:ES

TO THE HOt.ORABLE JUDGE OS AID COURT:
�OMES NOW, ROBBY ROBI:-fSON, Defand�nt, � hill
by and through . I
:,
attorney of record, SANTIAGO S ALINAS, makes and file■ this hi•
Notion to Require Police and other law enforcement agents to
Maintain Personal Notes, and in support of said Motion would show
unto the Court as follows:
I,
The Defendant has reason to believe that the p.-1rticular police

agency and individuals ·••ho were involved in the inveatigation of
the abov� styled and numbered cause may have taken per■onal notes
and/or tapes recordings during their investigation of the above
case. It is anticipated that those officer• and individual• ■ight

utilize thos• notes prior to testifying in order to refre■h their
me■ory concerning their activities in connection with the case.
It is likewise anticipated that auch notes and/or r.co1•ding were or·
will be used to a�sist in the preparation of state■ent and for■a l
report■. Under Texa• Rules of Criminal EVidence 611, 612 and 614.
such notes and/or recording ■ay beco■e relevant to and adai■sible
for the defense of this case.
ORDER Sf.ll'..llfiL.H.EAlU.filL.DAll:
The foregoing motion is o· dered set for per-trial hearing
pursuant to Article 28.01, TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. to be h�ld on the
day of ________, 19 __, at __ o'clock __ •
JUDGE PRESIDING
OBPER
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the
Defendant's Motion for Hearing to Determine Qualifications of
Reputation Character Witness to Testify as to Opinion of
Defendant's Reputation/Character is hereby GRANTED DENIED
on this ____ day ot _______, 19__ •
JUDGE PRESIDING
SANTIAGO SALINAS
3311 N. Main
(8),7) (,25-2337
Fax #: (817) 625-2380
Texas Bar No, 17536800
� sBTIFICATE OF SERVICE
On this the 16th day of November, 1998 a true and correct copy
of the above foregoing Motion was hand-delivered/ mailed to the
Assistant District Attorn�y of Tarran t County, Texas.
{il«?�
SANTIAGO SALINAS
MOTION NO . ....l.2_
NO. !HiJll!IH!A, Q2QJ2QQA, Q2nQ5A, & l.l2QJ2Q2A
J
cJ
STATE OF TEXAS * IN THE 372ND
*
vs. * DISTRICT COURT OF �
ROBBY ROBINSON * TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS
MOTION FOR HEARING TO DETERMINE QUALIFICATION OF REPUTATION

CHARACTER WITNESS TO TESTIFY As TO OPINION OF DEFENDANT'S
REPUTATION/CHARACTER; TEX, RULES CRIM, EVID,, 4Q5
COMES NOW, ROBBY ROBINSON, the Defendant in the above styled
and nlllllbered cause, by and through his attorney of record, SANTIAGO
SALINAS, Who pursuant to the provision of TEX. RULES CRIM. EVID.
405, files this his Motion to require the State to establish
whether any proposed reputation/character witness ls in fact
qualified to testify as to any opinion concerning the
reputation/character of the Defendant.
Further, since the said evidenct.• is only admissible when the
reputation and/or character of the Deftir.1ant has been put in issue,
the Defendant requests that the state advisP. the Defendant and the
court of the purpose of the introduction of said evidencP outside
the presence of the jury prior to its offer, in ord�r that the
Defendant may insure that the evidence is in fact admissible under
TEX. RULES CRIM. EVID. 405, and if found admissible, to insure
that the evidence is restricted to its proper scope and that th£
jury be so instructed pursuant to the express requirements of TEX.
RULES CRIM. EVID. 105(a).
WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED the Defendant respectfully
ruquest that the Court require the State to disclo3e any evidence
of opinion as to the reputation and/or chdracter of the Defendant
it intends to offer in this case. Further, the Def·endant
respectfully request that, after said disclosu�e, the Court exclude
the proffered evidence of opinion as to the reputation and/or
ci;aracter of the Defendant and rule same inadmissible in the trial
of this cause, or in the alternative, that the Court hold a
hearing, prior to the trial of this cause, to determine the
admissibility of the testimony concerning the said matter
and tt,at after said hearing, that tt,e Court exclude the proffered
evidence of said matter, or in the alternative, if the Court
permits the introduction of said testimony, that he Court inquire
of the State the purpose of its admission and, thereafter, that the
Court instruct the jury that this evidence is admitted for the said
limited purpose and that said evidence may only be considered for
the purpose for which it was admitted.
T
HE
CAUSE N O. 0631888A, 07 0
ST TE OF TE
A X AS
3 20 0 , 0 703205
A
s
A
IN T EH
• 07032 09
37 2 N D
A
l
v s. § DIS T RIC T COURT OF
ROBBY ROBINS
ON
s TA NT
,
RRA COUNTY TEXA S
0 RD B R
BE IT REMEMBER , that o nt h e
ED da f _ ___ __ _
19_, came on to be co sn ide er d he a_ v _
_
bo and y foore oin �ot
e
t g g io n for
Ciscover y o Co r ro bo ra ti ve Ev idenc e b e f en dant. Aft re
f y
D
consideration o f t eh sa m e, t i i s the opini no of t eh our t th t t e
C a h
sa me be:
GRANTE .
D
DENIE , to w hic h ruling th
D e efen d a tn ex ecp t
s.
D
S ET F R HEARI - -- ay f
O NG OH T HE d o
19_, at o'c lo c k
SIGNE :
D
JUDGE PRESIDING
WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Defendant herein would pray
for the court to order the state to reveal any evidence which would
tend to corroborate any accomplice testimony relevant to the case
at bar.
Santiago Salinas
3311 N. Main St.
Fort Worth, Texas 7610�
(817)625-2337
Fax#: (817)625-2380
STATE BAR# 17536800
As Attorney of Record for Defendant, l do hereby Certify that
a tlue and correct copy of the above and foregoing document wa¥

II.
In light of the requirement in Article 38,!4, Texas Code of

Criminal Procedure, that accomplice testimony be corroborated in
order to support a conviction, the t'efendant would pray for
discovery of the facts, circumstances and witnesses by which the
State intends to prove, beyond a reasonable doub�, that such
evidence tends to connect the Defendant to the offense �ommitted.
III.
Mere presence of the accused in the company of an accomplice

is insufficient to corroborate the accomplice testimony. AYola y.
stAu, 511 s.W,2d 287 (Tex.Crim.App. 1974). Testimony of one
accomplice cannot corroborate the testimony of another. ��PJIAD y•
.5.t.Attl, 470 S.W.2d 656 (Tex.Crim.App. 1971). The mere showin1 that
an offense occurred is not sufficient corroboration. Rica Y,
�. 587 s.W.2d 688 (Tex.Crim.App. 1979).
In Cherb v, State, 472 S.W.2d 273 (Tex. Crim. App. 1971), the
court of Criminal Appeals stated the rule governing the teat of the
sufficiency of the corroboration of an accomplice witness'
testimony: "We must eliminate the evidence of the accomplice from
consideration and then examine the evidence of other witnassee to
ascertain if there is inculpatory evidence or evidence of
incriminating character which tends to connect the accused with the
commission of the offense. If there is such evidence, the
corrobOration is si:fficient, otherwise, it is not."
MOTION NO. _ll....
CAUSE NO. 0631888A, 0703200A, 0703205A, & 0703209A
TH� STATE OF TEXAS s IN THE :.72ND

MQTIQ)I roa DISCOVQY or CORROBOQTIYI

IYIQIQICI TO &cco.NPLICI Tll'J'IIPIX

NOW COMES ROBBY ROBINSON, the Defendant in the above entitled
and numbered cause, by and through his Attorney of Record, and
would show unto the court as follows:
I.
The present case is founded in substantial measure \\pon the
testimony of one or more accomplice witnesses. In order to
ad equately propare for trial upon the merits, D�fendant must be
fully advised of the facts and circumstances which would tend to
support a conviction, if any, by the fact finder, thereby
preserving Defendant's rights under the Fifth, sixth and Fourteenth
Amendments to the United States Constitution, Article I, Sections
10 and 19 of the Texas Constitution, and Articles 1,04, 1,05 and
1.051(a) of the Texas Code Criminal Procedure.
CAUSE NO. �SA. 0703200A. 07QJ;05A. & 0703209A

vs. 5 DISTRICT COURT OF
0 R D I'! R
BE IT REMEMBERED, that on the day of ________
19_, came on to be considered the above and foregoing Motion by
Defendant for Suppression of statement. After consideration of the
same, it is the opinion of the Court that Defendant's Motion to
Suppress be:
) GRANTED, and by way of this order, all further use of
said statement in any prosec\.tion upon any causes of action
involving said statement, be, and are hereby, barred and
prohibited.
199_, at ___ o'clock
SIGNED:
JUDGE PRESIDING
a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing document waa
this date provided to the Attorney for the state.
l
IV.
r- tne abov e an d !oreg oi n rea sons the admi sio n
r
g , s of t he
Defendant' o statemen t vio la t es the efe nd nt' e r i h t s n e th e
D a g u d r
Fifth, Sixt h an d Four teent h Amendme nts to t h n ted
e t a
Constitution, Article 1 , Sec ti ons 10 a n d 9 U i S t• •
1 f t eh exas
o T
Constitution, an d Artic le■ !.04, 1,05 , .05l ( a nd 8 re
l a . 2J , x aa
) J
Cod e o f Crimina l Proc ed ure.
WHEREFOR , PREMIS S NSI E , th e efe n d ant e ft n wo ld
E E C O DER D D h r i u
re spectfu ll y pray tha t this Cou rt condu ct a re-tr a
p i l hearing on
this Motion, an d afte r s uc h h ea ring , t h a tthis Cou r t rd o er a n and
y
all oral o r written sta te ment• taken froa the efendan s u press ed
D t p
for the aforemention e d reasons. Def nde an t p r a s for u ch o e and
y � th r
further relief aa to w hic h the efeid1 a nt may be n i e d
D e
t tl .
R P
ES ECTFULL Y
SUBMITTED,
Sant ago Sal

JJll N Main est.
Fort Worth, x as
( 8 17 )625-2337T 7 6106
7
Fax #: (81 ) 625-2380
S AT TE B AR I 1753680 0
A RNEY
TTO FO R D£P D
EH ANT
M TO I N O •
CAUS NO. 06 31 88 8, 070 2 0 0 , 070 205 , i 0 703O .QU2 N .....l.lL
E A J A J A
THE ST ATE OF T XA
E S s I N T Ht: 723 DN
v s.
RO BY ROBIN
SO N
s DIST IR CT C U
O R T OF
B
IIOHOJI s TARRAN T COUN TY, TE.:XAS
IJJITO
I IRIIIII
QMT
TO PPAPI
AGII QII YIT'
, IIMWQ IDT P
UT
T0 THE HONORA L E J Q
DG UR :
U E OP SAID C O T
B
OW COMES R ON , t he De te ndant in t he above ntit ed
N OBBY ROBINS e l
a,xl nuaber ed ca u•e, by and throug h coun el , nd oul d how u to
• a w a n t he
Cour t i n su o t o t h is o ion o u r a e e
pp r t t s p p• •
M t St t a nt ot t
Detendan ,t un d er the au thor i ty of ac k■ on y. •o o ,o 37 8 u.s. 36he 8
(1964), the fo l low ing:
J P
the tl■e f any I.

d convers ta i n� by and be tween t e
t
A o r e
c o r
d e
Defendan t an d la w en orca■ent t c e a t he e n d h �
f o fi r , D f• na c waa eitb:r
unde r arres t o r as so \
w •u bsta tially depr ived of con•t tu i� ri
n
libe i.. .:ie s by the c o n d cut of law ontorc e i t
.. nt officers and th�
J
.
surroun din g c irc u smt ances a• t o onstitute an ar e t .
c r s
II.
Any re su ltin g stat e■ent, whether oral or writt ne, was
involuntary, coerc de a nd /or an ti cfld fr ■o the efen dant.
D
II I.
Defen dant was de ri
p ved of tie r i7h tto cou n• le , and dJ� not
intelli,Jently, un derstan da bl y an d kn wo i g yl aive ny r. ight to
n w a
Coun••l attor ded by the o s n titutio n ot th e n i ted st�te a nd ot
C • U M
the State of Texas.
CAUSE HO. 06Jl888A. 070J20QA, 01.0J2QSA, 6 P2P'.t21lll

O I P ILi
ON THIS, the --- day of ------· 19 __ , CSlle on to l,11
heard the foregoing Motion f or Disclosure of l11peachi,,g
Information, �nd the saae is hereby:
) GRANTED, and the Pros ecuting Attorney is hereby •'t der,irt
to request of the proper law enfoccemen� authorities a full an1
complete pri-,r criminal record and other such infor111ad.�n a■
requested by the Defendant herein and to furnis h said inforaatior.
to the Defendant prior to trial.
DENIED, to which action of the court t'.1e Oefaridant dJ!iy
excepts .
SET FOR HEARING on the _ day of -�-- ____ , 19_,
at ___ o'clock ---·

�IGNED:
JUDGE PRESIOr�;
prays that this Motion herein be granted.
��/4?'L
Santiago Salinas
3311 N. Main St.
(817)625-2337
Fax I: (817) 625-2380
STATE BAR I \7536800
CER;rIFICATE OF SERVICE
this date provided t� the Attorney for the State.
/
Prosecuting Attorney has L�al, apparent or perceived influence.
5. The existence and identif !cation of each occasion on

which the witness has testified before any court, grand jury, or
other tribunal or body or otherwise officially narrated in relation
to the Defendant, th� investigation, or ti facts of this case.
6. The existence and id<!ntification of each occasion on
which each witness who was or is an informer, accom�lice, co
conspirator, or expert has testified before any court, grand iury,
or other tribunal or body.
7. Any and all personnel files 'for the witness, the
existence and identity of all federal, state and local government
files of the witness and the existence and identity of all official
ir.ternal affairs, internal investigation or public integri�y
investigation files relating to or connected with each witness who
was or is a law enforcement officer.
a. Any and all other records and/or information which
arguably could be helpful or useful to the Defense in impeaching or
otherwise detracting from the probatlvo force of the state· s
evidence or which arguably could lead to such records or
information.
9. The same records and information requested in items l
thro�gh 8 above with respect to each non-witness declarant whoa,
statements are offered in evidence.
J, Any and all consideration or promises of consideration
given to or on behalf of the witness or expected or hoped for by
the wit�ess. By "conside1ation" Defendant refers to absolutely
anything, whether bargained for or not, which arguably could be of
value or use to a witness or to persons of concern to the witness,
including, but not limited to, formal or informal, direct or
indirect: leniency, fa·,orable treatment or recommendations or
other assistance with respect to any �ending or potential criminal,
parole, probation, pardon, clemency, civil, tax court, court of
clains, administratjve or other dispute with the Prosecuting
Attorney or with any other authority or with any other parties;
cr.l.minal, civil or tax immunity grants; relief from forfeiture;
payments of money, rewarjs or feei1, witness fees and special
witness fees, provision of food, clothing, shelter, transportation,
legal services or other benefits; placement ln a "witness
protection program", informer status of th& witness; �nd any other
infoL,nation which arguably could revaal an interest, motive or bias
in the witness in favc,r of the Plaintiff or against the Defense or
�ct as an inducement to testify or to cclor testimony.
4. Any and all threats, express or implied, direct or
j ndirect, or other coercion 111ade or directed against the witness,
criminal prosecutions, investigations, or potential pr�secutions
pending or which could be brought against the witness, any
probationary, parole, deferred prosecution or custodial status of
the witness, and any civil, tax court, court of claims,
admlnii.trative, or other pending or potential disputes or
transactions which the Prosecuting Attorney or over which the
M O TIO NN O, .....i_
CAUSE NO. 0631888A
.
0703200A . 0703205
A .
& 0
7
0
3 2 9
0 A
TH STA TEXA IN T E 372

s
E E F
T O S H D
DI T T N
vs.
ROBB ROSINSO
s R
S IC COURT OF
s T
Y f
N N
AR T RAN CO 'UNY. TE X A S
IQ'1'IQI roa
DI8CLO@Qlll
OZ IKPllCJJNA Jll'OBNITIAM
TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE F SA D COUR

O I T:
COMES NOW, the Defen d n , t in the a bov e ent itle d and nu bered _
m
cause , by an d throu g h his Atto rney of Rec or ,d a nd r se p e c tfu l ' 1
l y
moves this Court pursuant to the Fifth Si th an
, x d Fourteent:.
Amendments to the United sta te s Cons tit ut io n , t i
Ar cle I, Secti� 1
10 and 19 of the Texas Con stitu ti no , r t ic les 1. C4, l. 5 a� )
A 0
l.OSl(a) of the Te xa s Co d e o f Cr im in a l Pr oc e ud re , a dn t he
principle s of Brady y. Maryland, 373 u. s. 83 (19 63) , for en rt y of
an Order directing the Prose cu tin g Atto r en
y forth iw th to make
in qui ry an d disclose al l o the fo llo win g w it hi n th e p osses ion
f s ,
custod y or control o f the State, o r the e xi te n ec o f w l1ic h s kn o w n
s i
or by the exercise o. due diligen ec c o uld bec om w
e k no n to the
Prosecutin g Attorne y:
l. Any and all reco r ds an d in forma tion re ve
aling prior
felon convictions or gu i lty ver dic ts o r juv en ile a d judic a to n
y
i s
attributed t o each witne ss ca e ll d b th e Pr o s c
e u t ng Att o rney,
i
y
including, but not limitttd to, re le v an t "r a sheet ".
p s
2. Any and all re c o rds an d in fo r m a tion re ev li
a ng prior
misconduct or cad acts attribute d to the w itness.
•
CAUSE NO. 0631888A, 0703200A, 0703205A, 0703209A

vs. s Dl£TRICT COURT OF
o a D • a
BE IT REMEMBERED, that on the day of
19__, came on to be considered the above and foregoing Motion to
Require Disclosure of Informer's Identity. After consideration of
the same, it is the opinion of the Court that Defendant's Motion
be:
GRANTED.
SET FOR HEARING ON THE --- day of
199 I at o'clock
SIGN:...D:
JUDGE PRESIDING
prays that the c�urt grant this �otion and order all such relief to
which Defendant is entitled under the Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth
Amend ments to the United states Constitution, Article I, Sections
10 and 19 of the T�xas Constitution, and Articles 1.04, 1,05 and
l.05l(a) of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure.
.u/!t#[._¥
3311 N, Main
(817)625-2337
(817)625-2380
STATE BAR# 17536800
ATTO�EY FOR DEFENDANT
Ao Attorney of Record for Defendant, I do hereby Certify that
this date provided to thn Attorney for the State.
Date: //ulf. I 3 Ir ff
1
III.
The informer is a material witness on thE issues of the
Defendant's guilt or innocence and the existence of entrapment as
a matter of law and/or fact.
IV.
The informer's identity is necessary to the presentation of
the proof that the officers did not rely upon credible information
supplied by a reliable informer.
v.
In the event that this court determines that the identity of
the info.rmer should be disclose�, and the prosecution elects not to
disclose the informer's identity, the Defendant further moves that
this Honorable Court dismiss the charges to which the testimony
would relate.
VI.
In the event that the Court declines to order that the

identity of the confidential informant be disclosed to the defense,
the Defendant respectfully moves that the court order all evidence
submitted to the court in camera be sealed and preserved in order
that it may be made available to the Appellate Cour.t in the event
of a conviction and a subsequent appeal,
p
MO'l'ION NO, _a_
CAUSE NO. �631888A, 0703200A. 0703205A, & 0703209A
THE STATE or TEXAS s IN THE 372ND

vs. s DISTRICT COURT or
NO'flAI TO IIQQlll PllCLQIQII or 1110•10•1 lPINTITX

COMES NOW, ROBBY ROBINSON, the Defendant in the above entitled
and n\ll'llbered cause, and moves the court to instruct the Prosecution
to reveal the true name of the informer upon whose .information
probable cause for ftrrest, search and seizure of the Defendant was
predicated in this cause, in accordance with Rule 508 of the Texas
Rules of Criminal Evidence. Defendant submits that the identity of
the confidential informant ir this case is necessary to ll fait'
determination of the issues of guilt or innocence. Royiaro y,
Unite:1 States, 353 U.S. 53 (1957); Bga.J.n Y, State, 807 S.W.2d 313
(Tex. Crim. App. 1991). As grounds therefor, the Defendant states:

I.
The informer in this cause participated in th• couiasion of
the alleged offense.
II.
The informer may have been present at th� time of the offense
charged against the Defendant.
•
CAUSE NO. �631888A, 0703200A, 0703205A, '0703209A

ROBBY ROBINSON S TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS
0 RD IR
BE IT REMEMBERED, that on the ___ day of

19_, came on to be considered the above and foregoing Motion to
Exclude Inadmissible Photographs. After consideration of the same,

it is the opinion of the Court that Defendant's Motion be:
GRANTED.
DENIED, to which ruling the Defen�ant excepts.
199_, at ___ o'clock
SIGNED:
JUDGE PRESIDING
WHER:FORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, the Defendant prays that the
Court suppress from evidence before the jury the above mentioned
photographs for the reasons given and for such other reasons that
will appear at plenary hearing.
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITI'ED,
Sant ago Sa 1nas

3311 N, Main
(817)625-2337
Fax #: (817) 625-2380
STATE BAR# 17536800
a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing docU11ent waa
Date: t,/;J,/,(J.1�1/
III.
The phctographs complained of are not material or relevant to
any issue on trial, and cannot be attributed to any act of the
Defendant.
IV.
The photographs complained of have very slight, if any,
pi:·obative value and great inflauatory aspects. While theso
photographs are not probative to any issue in this trial, they
suggest extraneous offenses which may .be inadmissible ir. the trial
of this cause. The inflammatory aspects of th�Ye photograph• are
so great that should the jur�• be allo,.,ed tv view them or even hear
mention of them no instructjon to the jury by the Court coulct cure
the prejudicial, infla1111Mtory and haraful effect upon the jury. If
the jury is allowed to view these photogr�phs or hear ■•nticn of
them, the Defendant would be effectively denied Defendant's dgt.t
to a fair trial. before a fair and impartial jury, in vic,J.atic.,;i of
the Fifth and Jo'ourteenth Amendments to the 11n i tc-d St11 tea
Constitution, Article I, Sections 10 nnd 19 of the Texaa
Constitution, and Article 1.05 of the TEIXa& Code ot Cri■inAl
Procedure. � Long y, stata , 823 s.w. 2d 568 {Tex. cri■. App.
1992), and Montgomery y, state. 810 s.w.2d 372 (Tex. cri■. App.
1991).
MOTION NO • ..:L.
CAUSE NO. Q6,'31888A, 07Q32QOA, J)7Q32QSA, i Q703209A
THE STATE C,F TEXAS s IN 'i'ijE 3 7 2ND

ROBBY ROBINSON S TARFANT COUNTY, TEXAS
Dl!IIPIIT'I XQ'fJOII TO
IICLUDZ !DJW!IIXILI Pl?T0411PBI

Col!lea now the Defendant in the above entitled a11d numbered
c�use, by and through Defendant's Attorney of Record, and moves the
Court, pursui-.nt to Rule 4 OJ of the Texas kules of er i•inal
E',idence, to exclude froa evidence the following �hotagraphs, to
wit:
l. All photographs taken of all injured part.lea, Eubsequent
to the discovery of his �-.)dy.
As a basis for this iA<>tion, Defendant would she ., the Court as
follows:
I.
The photcgraphs in question have very alight, if �ny,

problltive value, and are hi�hly prejudicial against Defendant.
II.
The photogrDphs are extremely gruesor.e to the sensibilities of

reasonable persona and are calculated to appeal only to the base
inat.incts of tho v1ewer..
CERTIFICATE OF SERYICE
atf;Z�
On this the 13th uay of November, 1998, a true and correct
cory of the above and foregoing Motion for P roduction of E"idence
Favorable to the Accused was hand delivered/mailed to the Assistant
District Attorney of Tarrant County, Texas.
Sl\NTIAGO SALINAS
The foregoing motion is ordered set for rre-trial heai·lng

pursuant to Art.28,01, TEX. CODE r.RIM. PROC. to be held on the
____ day of _________ , 19__, at ___ o' r. lock
--·
JUDGE PRESIDitlG
Q....BJLLR
1T IS HEREBY ORDEF.'t':D , AD,�uoci;;c AifD tECREEn that the
foregoing Motion is hureby GR.\N'rF.c r•ENIED on this tn•
day of _______ , 19 __ .
JUDGE PRESIDING
5. A ny information which may tend to adversely affect the
credibility of any person called as a witness by the state, Giglio
vs, u,s�, 405 u.s. 150 (1972) ;crutcher vs, stote, 481 s.w. 2d 113
(TEX. CRIM. APP. 1972) i.'lcluding the arrest and/or c::onviction
record of each state witne�s, and including any offers of immunity
or leniency, whether mad� directly or indirectly, to any State's
witness in exch,nge fo� testimony.
6. The results of any scientific or other tests conducted in

this case which does or may reveal information favorable to the
Defendant.
II.
In connection with this request, Defendant respectfully moves

the Court t o order the stat� and it's agents to provide any and all
exculpatory mater.ials whether or not it is in the possession of the
District Attorney's office. Whether the prosecutor has actual
knowledge of the exculpatory information is irrelevant. If thece
is exculpatory information in the possession of the bw enf01·cement
agents, this k�owledge 1s imputed to the stato. Ex Parte Adams 768
S,W. 2nd 281 {TEX. CRIM. APP. 1989). The Defendant would request
that the Assistant District Attorney representing the State inquire
of All law enforcel\\ent officers whether they have knowladge of
exculpatory itlformation or evidence. The Defendant would further
request that the State's inquiry include not only evidence li•hich
exculpates guilt, but evidence which may tend to mitigate ;)r
lessen punishment. The Defendant would further r�quest that the
state instruct the law enforcement agents as to th� nature of
exculpatory and mitigating evidence and that the law enforcement
agents' opinion as to the �redibility of that evidGn�e is
irrelevant.
Resrectfully submitted,
t@ctfa_$_��-
sANTIAGo SALINAS
3311 N. Main
Fort Worth, Texas 7�106
(817) 625-2337
Fax #: (817) 625-2380
Texas Bar No, 17536800
t "
MOTION NO.�
·1,
N0.06Jl888A. 0703200A. 0703205A. & 0703209A
•
STATE OF TEXAS
• IN THE 372ND ,
vs. • DISTRICT COURT OF
•
ROBBY ROBINSON ,:. TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS
MOTION FOR PRODUCTION OF EVIDENCE

FAVORABLE TO THE ACCUSED
COMES NOW, ROBBY ROBINSON, Defendant, by and through his
att0rney of record, SANTIAGO SALINAS, pursuant to the Fifth, Sixth,
and Fourteenth Amendments to the Ur.tied States Constitution and
Article 1, Section 10, of the Texas constitution and respectfully
moves the Court to instruct the attorney representin<:J the State of
Texas 1n this case to make available for Defendant's inspection and
copying or photographing any evidence or information within the
possession, custody or control of the State of Texas or any of its
agencies, the existence of which is known or which by the exercise
of due diligence may become known, to the State's attorney, and
which is favorable to the Defendant on the issue of guilt or
innocence or which may tend to mitigate or lessen punishment in the
event the court should r.-turn a verdict of guilty. Brady vs,
Marylarul, 373 U.S. 83 (1963).
I.
Defendant's request for disclosure and production includes,

but is not limited to, the following:
1. Any written or recorded statement of any person,
including the Def�ndant, which contains information favorable to
the Defendant.
2. The substance of any oral statement of any person,
includj· g the Defendant, which contains infor�ation favorable to
the De ..,ndant.
3. The names and addresses of all persons, including any
person or persons arrested with the Defendant, who have, or aay
have, information favorable to the Defendant.
4. The names and addresses of all persons interviewed by the
state in coMection with this investigation but who the State doe•
not intend to call as witnesses in this case who do or may have
evidence or information favorable to the Defend ant.
CAUSE N O. 0631888A
,
0703200A
,
0703205A
,
i 0 0 2
7 3 0 9
A
s
TH E STAT E
O F TEX S N
THE 37 ND
A I 2
vs.
s
DIST RI
R TO
COU
CT
s
ROBB Y ROBINSO N TARRANT C UN TE SXA
O T
Y,
0 R D S
D E I T REMEMBERE , tha t on the__ day

D _ of ____ _ _
_
199_, cam e on to b e considere d the a b o
ve a n d fo e
r
g on
i
g M o
tion to
Revea l Agreement. Afte r cons id
er a ti
on of the same , it
is
e
th
opinion � f the Cour t that De f n
e d
an t'
s Mo on
ti
b e
:
GRANTED.
DENIED, t o which ru lin � the De f

en d
ant e x c ept s.
SE T FO R HEARIN O TH E___ da
o f _
G
N _
_ _ _
y _
199_ , a t___ o'cloc k
SIGNED:
JUDG PR E I I G
E S D N
WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDER�D, Defendant moves the Court to
grant this Motion in all things.
.M.@l
3311 N. Main
(817)625-2337
FAX# (817)625-2380
State Bar# 17536800
As Attorney of Record for Defendant, I do hereby certify that
a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing document wa■
this date provided to the Attorney for the state.
Date:

- I f)
MOTION NO, _!2,._

CAUSE NO. 0631888A, 0703200A, 0703205A, & 01ojio9A

vs. s UISTRICT COURT OF
HOTIOII TO HQQIBI IDTI TO IIYllle MX IQJlllQCIIIT

IUUIQ nrro IIDIA 'l'II l'IITI MD PX IIOIICQTIOlf
IITIJIII TQT COQLQ COICIIYllLJ IIILQQCI TIITIIOJ(Y
COMES NOW the Defendant in the above entitled and numbered
cause, by and through counsel, and moves the Court to iss�a an
order requiring the state to reveal any agreement entered into
between the Proaer.:uting Attorney or any othe!t: law enforcement
agency and any Prosecution Witnesa that could conceivably influence
said witness• testimony on the followirg grounds:
I.
That said credibility of said witnesses will be an important

issue in the principal case, and the evidence of any understanding
or agreement as to future prosecution would be ::·elevant to such
wi�ness• credibility and the trial jury is er.titled to know of it.
II,
That a refusal to reveal any such agreement constitutes a

violation of the due process protections provided by the FHth and
Fourteenth Amendments to the United Stat�:J Constitution, Article I,
F-�ctions 10, 13 and 19 of the Texas Constitution, and Articles 1,04
and 1.05 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure.
CERTIFICATE Of SEBYl.C.f.
I hereby C£ctify that on this (3.�_day of November 1998

true and corr�ct copy of the foregoing motion was delivered/mailed
to the Distri�t Attorney, of Tarrant county, Texas.
��--
SANTIAGO SALINAS
ORDER SETTING Ht;ARING OAll

pursuant to AR'J'. 28,01, TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. to be held on thf'
___ day of-· ____ , 19_, at ____ o'clock ___.
JUDGE Pk�SIDING
ORDl:B
On this ths ___ day of _______ , 19__ , came on to
be heard the Defendant's foregoi�g Hotion for Duplicate

Photographs and IT IS ORDERED AND DECREED that the forego1n9 Motion
is hereby
(GRANTED) (DENIED)
JUOOE PRE&IDitlG
IV,
Defendant would specifically request that the state also

provide photographs of other persons accused, including JULIAN
BURT, MALCOLM GRIFFIN, and ANTijONY FENNELL.
WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSID:"�ED, the Defendant respectfully
prays that this Honorable Court order the State to provide
Defendant's attorney with duplicate photographs taken in connection
with this case and duplicate photographs of other defendants or
persons accused.
SANTIAGO SALINAS
3311 N, Main
(817) 625-2337
Fax#: (817) 625-2380
Texas 9ar No. 17536800
r
r,
MOTION NO. -L..
NO.�..B.A,.._.Q.1.0..J.lOOA, 0703205A, & 0703209A
STl,TE OF TEXAS IN THE 372ND
I
ROBBY ROBI�:SON * TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS
MOTION FOR PUPLICATI. PHOTOGRAPHS
TO THE HONORABLE ,JUDGE OF SAID COURT:
COMES NOW, ROBBY ROBINSON, the Def£ndant in the above styled

and number.ad cause, by and through his attorney of record, SANTIAGO
SALINAS, a·nd requests the Court to order the State provide the
D efendant with a duplicate set of all photographs take� in
connection with this cause and would show the court as follows:
I.
'rhat numerous photographs were taken in the investigation of
the alleged homicid� that form the basis of this case.
II.
That there is now no way that the Defendant's attor.ney can
make an on-the-scene examination of the alleged murder site as it
then appeiared.
III.
That it is necessary for the Defendant's attorney to have

these photo�raphs available so as to be able to use and refer to
them at all times during pre-trial investigation in order to render
the Defendant effective assistance of counsel at triai.
•rhe foregoing motion is orden•d s<:.'.: fo·c pre-trial hearing

pur,,111ant to Art.28.01, TEY.. CODE CRIM. PROC. to be held on the
day of _ __________ , 19 ___ , at ___ o' c lo�k
--·
JUDGE PR".:SIDnm
I'T IS HERl-;B;{ ORDERED , AD.JtrD�EfJ .\NO DEcru:elJ that the
GIU..N'l'ED D01li::•J on thb tha __
day of-····------• 19 ___ .
JUDGi PRESlOrnG
WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, the Defendant r.3apectru l.ly
prays that this Honorable Court will conduct a pretrial hearinc1 on
this motion, and aft�r hearing evidence hereon, that this Honor�ble
court will order any and all oral or written statements by law
enforcement officers sup�ressed for the aforementioned reasons and
foe such other and further reasons which may d�velop during said
hearing.
RespP.ctfully submitted,
.{if;{ti!f
3311 ... �ain
(817) 625-2337
Fax #: (£17) 625-2380
�TTORNEY FOR �F.FENDANT
cER�UICATE OF SERVICE
On thj.s the j_ 3 I?, day of November, 1998, a true and correct

copy of th� above and foregoing Motlon To Suppr�s� oral and written
statements has beE:n 1and deliver-ed/aailed to the Assistant Distri�t
�ttorney of Tarrart County, Texas.
�
SANTIAG<' SALINAS
,.
MOTION NO. _.L

NO.06Jl888A, 070J2QQA 07o)i05b, i 02mA
STATE OF TEXAS rn THE 372ND

ROB!il/ ROtHNSON TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS
�- TO SUPPRES!s ORAL ANO WRITTEN STATEMEN'l'.S
TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF SAIO COURT:
COMES NOW, ROBBY ROBINSON, the Defendant in the clboVt'J styled

and numbered cause and files this Motion to suppress Ural and
Written Statements purportedly made by the Defendant to any law
enforceme�t �fficer and in support thereof would show the court as
follows:
I.
The State h�s indicated ttat certain oral and written

statements WQre made by the Defendant; to �gents of the State
subsequent to the arrest of Defendant b}· officers of the State, or
after Defendant came under suspicion of this offense.
II.
The aforesaid state:"lents were taken as a result cf ia�roper

promises and inducements made to the Deiend�nt by La� enforcement
agents.
III.
That aforesaid or�l and written state■ents were not

v�lurtarily given, �nd were obtained in violation of Defendant'•
rights under the Fo,trth, Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth Aaendaenta to
the United Sta'i.:es constitution; Article I, Section 9 of tne T�x•�
constitution; and Articles 38.22 and 38.23 of the Texas Cod• of
Cr. iminal Proced•1re.
1�
I hereby certify that on this / 3 " day c:' November 1998
true and corre.:t copy of the foregoing motion was Cl.u:tivered/m,:1iled
tc the District Attorney, of Tarrant co Tex��.
�
/:(/�/Jf_
SANTIAGO SALINAS

The fc- .cgoing motion is ordered set for pre-tri.. l hearing
pursuant to ART. 28.01, TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. to be h�ld on the
___ day of ________, 1994.
JUDGE PRESIDING
on this the ____ day of____ , 19_, came on to

be heard the D�fendant•s foregoing Moticn to Proeuce WitneasAs'
stat�ments and said Motiun is hereby
(GRANTED) (DENIED).
JUDGE
TIi
ND.n6 Jl888
A, 0 703200 A , 07032 0 5 A, & 07 30 02 MOA9TION NO. 2
V
ST ATE OF TE S '(J i
XA *
/ <?
IN T HE. 372ND
vs. *
* DISTRICT COUkT OF hi'\
ROBBY ROBINS *
ON *
NOTION T O P R 0QU C E WT.TNESSE T'SARRA CEMONUNT YT , TEXAS
T NAT T E S
S
TO THE HONORA DG UR
BLE JU E OF SAID CO T:
CO�ES N W ,
O ROBBY ROB INSO N, D e ef dn a tn in the above s
number ed ca u e tyled and
s , b y and t rh ough hi at o ney o o
s t r f rec rd, S ANTIAGO
SALIN , an d er s e t u l n!q u s t i;
AS p c f ly e t h e u
o rt to inst u ct th e
attorn ye for the ta t e t o hav� va C r
S a ilab le for us e by the Defendant
a y w itt n
n r e lita t c emnts, note , re cordi n s or ot
s g he r memoranda u any
witnesses w hi ch w r e ma ed t m f
e a a ti e p rev oi us to th etrial o f \:his
cause , so th t e
a th Defe ndan t may ha ev such st tem nt
pu rpose o f c o a e ■ for the
r ss-ex a im at i o n u su a t to e h
n p r n Rul 61d of t e Texas
Rule s o f Cr im ina l Evi nc .e
de
WHEREFOR , P
E REMISES CONSIDER ED, Defendant resp ctful y pray
tha t this Mo tio n in all th in s be a e l s
g gr n ted by the ou t a d 'lt t
C r n tr he
Stat e atto neys be so i stru ct d
r n e .
e c
l su tted,
R s p e tfu ly bmi
SANTIAGO SAL N SA
3311 N. M a :nI
Fort Worth, Texas 76 06
(817) 625-2 37 1
Fax #: a(8 17)3 625-2380
o o
T xaa B r N . 17536800
TTO EY F OR D FEEN DANT
A RN
Q.RD.EB
The foregoing Moticn is GRANTED as to the following

paragraphs:
SIGNED and ENTERED this __ _ day of _________

19_.
JUDGE PRESIDING
with said line-up.
XI.
Defend,rnt req:.iests tt,at the co·-,rt require the prosecution to

inform thls defendant before the trial begins if the State contends
that there are other conne-cted cases pending again1$t any other
persons in connecti�n with this r.ase and arising out of the same
transaction or facts. The Defendant requesta that he state name
any co-conspirators and co-defendants or accomplices who the State
believes may have participated in the commission Jf the cha�ged
offense.
The Defendant requests a hearing on his Motion and asks the
Court to granl the relief request�d.
dtf,�--,---------
�
Santia g � Salinas
3311 N. Main
(817) 625-2337
State Bar #17536800
ATTORNEY FOR DEFENr ....,.
I hereby certify that on this /?>'/A day of
November, 1998, a true c.nd correct copy of the foregoing Motion was
&�at..,
delivered to the Distri�t Attorney, Tarrant County, Texas.
SANTIAGO SALINAS
v.
Defendant requests the State to provide him with th& copies or
allow the 1efendant to insppct and make copies there�f., of any
photcgraphs, maps diagrams, drawings and other tangible exhibits
prepared by the State or its agents in their investigation of this
case.
VI.
The Defendant requeot that the court order the State to

provide him with t:-ie name, address and telephone number of any
witness which it does not anticipate calling t� testify at the time
of trial, but which it believes, or has reason to believ�, �ay have
material information relating to the innocence of the Defendant.
VII.
The defendant further requests thp Court to order the State tc.
produce at a reasor,able time prior to trial any exhibits which they
expect to introduce as evidence in this case including any video
tape or audio tape use:i to secretly video tape or audio t�!'•
defendant in any transaction involving undercover police officers
or confidential informants.
VIII.
Oefe•1dant request of the court that it order the state tc.

produce and furnish at a reasonable time before trial tc the
De?endant any copy of the report or the result of any scientific
tests, examination, comparison, or analysis ordered or received by
the prosecution in conn�ction with this case.
Defendant requests that the prosecution be re1uired to permit

Defendant to see, inspect and copy at a reasonable time prior to
trial, any search warrants or arrest warrants, together with the
affidavit and applications for such warrants and the olficera'
return on such warrants, if any such warrunts exist in conr.act:lon
with this case.
x.
Defendant requests that the state inform defendant 3& to when
the defendant, if he was, may have been personally exhibited in a
line-up by himself or with other persons. In that connection the
Defendant requests to be informed as to when ar.d where au.:h
exhib:i.tion waa held and whether or not the Defendant waa identified
by any witnesses and naming such witneaaea by na■e an1 address and
any in&trument signed or executed by the defendant in connection
,--
MOTION N, . 1
NO. 0631888A. 0703200A, 0703205A, i 07032(UIA
ST:,TE OF TEXAS s IN THE 372nd
�
s
ROBBY ROBINSON s TARAANT COUNTY, TEXAS
DEFENDANT'S MQ�IQN FOR DISCOVER¥

TO THE HOMORABLE JUDGE OF SAID COURT:
COMES NOW, ROBBY ROijlNSON, the Defendant, in the above styled
and numbered cause and respectfully files this his Motion for
Discovery in accordance with the Texas Code of Criminal Procedu�e,
and the rights insured him under the Federal and state
Constitution, and in support thereof, respectfully request the
following:
I.
Defendant requests the Court to order the State to provide him

with a copy of any and all written statements, if any, that he may
have given to the State or any OL its agents, including any Grand
Jury testimony, if any.
II.
In the event of an oral statement by t.he Defendt>.nt is being

relied upon by the f�ate in the prosecution of tnis case or such
statement is exculpa.:ory in nature, the Dafendant requests the
court. to instruct the State to provide him the summary or text of
flUCh statement or statemento, and advise the time, J: lace, and
persons to whom such statements were made.
III.
Defendant requests the court to order the State to provide him

with the name, address, and telephone number of each and every
witness, known to the State whc �ay know any fact material to the
pr�secution or defense of this cbse.
JV.
Defentiant requests of the Court to instr,•_� the State to
provide him with copies, �r permit 1$fendant to ,�py, the FBI and
Texas Department of Public Safety "rid any oth, .r law enforcement
agencies criminal records relating to the defent�nt•s prior ��r•ata
bnd convictions, if any.
The parties entrr into this Written Plea Bargain Agreement on this the / CJ �ay of November,
: 998, as evidenced by their respective signatures and asks this Court to accept this written plea
bargain agreement.
?&M>.-�(-�w
'➔
Robby Rabinson
/4-r.Mt--
Gregory T. Mil!er
&0 �
Defendant Assistant Criminal District Attorney
State Bar N 1 4073650
L:ntiago Salinas
State Bar No. 175361100
The Defenda11I Lf specifically p111 on notice t/,at itt t/,e event I/tat tl,e nefendant
attempts, in any manner whatsoever, to appeal from tlrese convictlon.f, either
directly or indirectly, titen this plea bargain �- ,rull and Yoid and tht! vartie.� return
10 their respt'ctivc positio11s as if this written plea bargain never ex.•1·ted.
8. The Defendant agrees to implicate and truthfully testify against the other three co
defendants: Julian Burt, Malcom Alvin Griffin 11, and Anthony Fennell. lfthere arc
other unindicted co-conspirators then th1: Defendant agrees to implicate and truthfully
te stily aga:nst any ofthose individuals.
The Defendant agrees to cooperate with representatives of the Tarrant C0unty

Cdminal District Attorney's Office and to make himself available for any pre-trial
preparations and testifying as often as needed. This includes any situation where one
of the cc.-defendants may be successful on appeal and a re-trial is mandated.
9. Regarding Indictment # 0631888A, the Stlte of Texas will dismis� that case.
However. that dismissal will b.: ''-.iii/rout prejudice."
Tht Defe11da11t is specifically ;,ut 011 noti<'e that the a/legations contained in
Indictment # 061Jl888A are Capitul Murder and that the elements of that
Indictment are different and apwrtfrom those elements cvnlained in Indictment
# 0703200A and 0703205A. Accordingly, there is no Double Jeopardy proMem.
Also, thue is no Statute of Limitations on Capital Murder.
The State of Texas will ooly proceed to trial on Indictment# 0631888A iftbc
Defendant fails to abide by the entire terms of this Written P/ec Bargain
Agreement.
10. In the event that any requirement of this Written Pita Bargain Agreement i.;
breached. then the entire plea bargain is null and void and the parties retum to their
rerpective positions as if this written plea bargain never exis!ed.
11. As a part of this plea bargain, the Court will make an affirmative finding concerning
the use or exhibition of a deadly weaPon, to-wit: a firearm.
I 2. As a part ofthis plea barga:n. the State ofTexas, through the undersignec prosecutor,
hereby agrees to recite on the S1a1eme111 of Fact form that is submitted to the
Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice that Robby
Robinson did not personally fire any firearm during these C'apital Murders or
Murder, but was acting as a Party to ,hese offenses. However. such a recitation has
no legal impact of the affirmative finding concerning the use or exhibition of a
deadly weapon as p,ovided for in# I i above.
FILED
THOMAS A. WILDER. 01ST. Cl.ERK
--
TAARANT COUNTY, TEXAS
NOS. 0631888A, 0703200A, 0703205A, & 0703209A
NOV t 9 1998
THE STATE OF TEXAS {} lN THE 372N�J�CIAL
Timm • '
vs. {} DISTRJl!Yr€0Ulff 4'�
�1'11
ROBD0RORINSON {} TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS
WRITTEN PLEA BARGAIN AGREEMENT
C'OMES NOW the State of Texas by and through her Criminal Di:;trict Attorney Tim Curry
and the Defendant. Robby Robinson, represented by his attorney of record, Santiago Salinas, .md
the parties enter inlo this written plea bargain agreement.
I. The Defendant is charged in Indictments# 063 I 888A, 0703200A, and 0703205A

"ith the offenses of Capital Murder. (Indictment# 063 I 8888A will be discusse,i
in section 9 below.) The State of Texas intends to proceed on the lesser-included
offenses of Murder in Indictments# 0703200A and 0703205:\.
2. In return for pleas of "guilty'· to the lesser offense of Murder in Indictments #

0703200A and 0703205A the Defendant will receive two (2) forty-two (42) yc:ir
sentenr s to the offenses of Muraer.
3. The Defendant in Indictment # 0703209A is charged with offorise of Murder. In

return fc: a plea of "guilty" to Indictment fl 0703209A the Defendant will also
receive a forty-two (42) year �entence for the offense of Murder.
4. In exchange for these pleas of "guilty" the State will recommrnd to the Court tint
these three (3) forty-two (42) year sentences shall be sc:rved concurrently or at the
same time.
5. The Defendant shall receive credit for all the time he has been in custody on these
charges, inc!ud:ng any such time as there w11.s a detainer on him from TaiTant County,
Texas.
The Defendant specifically waives any anJ all pre-trial motions that may have be en
tiled on his behalf.
7. The Defendant specifically gives up his right of appeal in each of these cases,
including but not limited to any po. conviction proceeding under Article 11.07 of
the Code of Criminal Procedure and any other collateral appeal of any nature.
C E � T I � I A T E O F P R C C E F. D I N G �
� • .JI
CASE NO. 0631888A
THE STATE OP TEXAS I IN THB 3nND DISTRICT
vs. § COURT OF
ROBBY JAY ROBINSON AKA: TARRANT COUNTY, UXAS
ROBBY ROBINSON
ORDER ENTERtNG DF.FEND,\N'f'S TRUE NAME INTO MINUl'ES OF THE COURT

DATE OP ORDER: NOVEMBER 19, 1998
BE IT KNOWN that on lb.it day, 1eC forth aboYo, caim oa lo be board tho Dofondaat ill tho aboYo tty!ed MIi
numbonid calillO and 11111etled that h11/bu true name i■:
ROBBY JAY ROBINSON
and ulte&: lhat hit/her name be chan1o,ci from:
ROBBY ROBINSON
u tlleaed ill tho INDICTMENT.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED AND ADJUOOED that Ibo Defendanl t tnio u,ne be oatered into tbt ,...._
of the Court, and that tll inatnune,111 and the INDICTMENT recite
ROBBY JAY ROBINSON
u tho Defendant'• true name.
PRESIDING JuooE
Dato Si,oed: NOVEMBliR 23, 1991
,-.
CASE NO.
THE STATE OF TEXAS INTI-IE
COURT _________
REQUEST FOR COUNSEL
On 1his _dL' t) day or 19 _ft,l have been advised by the Court or

oflhc�nding against me. I crnify 1ha1 I am wi1huu1 means
my right to rcprcscnti:.tion by counsel in the lria��
to employ counsel uf my own choosing and I l:crcby request the C,iurt to appoint cou:iscl for me.
OATH
I
, ____..{J.(L..G{!::.l4�,::J../L��----- being p re5c:ntly inc.1rceratcd in
Tarrant County Jail i ty, · :<as, declare un er penalty r,f perjury 1hat the foregoing is true and correct.
Executed this 3t,;.J dayor_J}

�
,19 f&.
MTi7��8
OROF.R APPOINTING COUNSEL
The Court determines this dl'fcndanl i\ indigent. _
It is the refore ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECRF.ED that_/��

a practicing allornl')' or this Court, is appointed lo defend said defendant.
/
..Akd
d,�J ,
/
/"
3/0
\mm�JiJ�
Signe<! this day of 19£. (
.
�7L�
1'Jd�./p(J6lt16
,
Please be advised that )'OU have bi!cn appointed lo represent the above Jckndant, who is charged with 10('
1l
:::�sen� canrtncd I c �arrant �41(:�4/,""
. )___________
You will be notified by the Court of the Selling date.
TO: AUDITOR, TAllllANT COUNTY, TEXAS
Thia is to certify that t.bc abo\'lr lllilUcld.'luri-Udcatt

rcrrescotiaa tbc abo\� IIIIIICd de
JUDGE, ___.:f"-'%'K
c.. '_ DISTRICT
-=:;;..
COURT _________
DC-6M Gl'C•llll RHV.9.ff
CASE NO.
THE STATE OF TEXAS IN THE 3 7.:2 MDISTRICT

COURT _________
On this--,,--,--- day of -,...,...�-,-+--,-+-- -• 19__ , I have been advised by the Court of

-,- -.,,.
my right lo r.:pn·scnlalion by counsel in the trial of th gc pending against me. I certify that I am without means
to employ counsel of my own choosing and J hereby re u ·1 the Court 10 appoint counsel for mr.
J, - - - being prw:ntly incarcerated in

-,-� -;-c--::- :----.-
Tarrant County jiiij in Tarrant ':ounly, Texas, ·naHy of perjury th;.t the foregoing is true and correct.
Excc111cd this ____ <la>.:
ORfil3R APPOINTING COUNSEL
The Court determines this defendant is indigent.
¥
It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED A.ND DECREED tbal -J'(;/J.122.�t:f.��..,l!��e,._�
a practicing allorncy of this Court, is appointl,J to defend so.id d-J,·ndanl.
Sig,,rn;, ,£1.5Yi "' or
rufu.��r,j--=-..:c...:-""-+-=-
You will be notified by th:: Court of the Setting date.
----�-
THOMAS A. WILDER. DISTRICT CLERK
o!� ---L-�-.,.
1lffll
TO: AUDITOR, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS
This is to certify that thc above auorncy bu a

represcoting the abovc named defendant in the a�
. _R,
JUDGE, __,_..zz.,.____ DISTRJ\.'T
COURT _________
(
11/18/98 T�lephone Conf. with Lou, DA's office 0.1

11/18/98 T8lephone Conf. with Lorrie, Court Coordinator 0.1
11/19/98 Conf. with G. Miller, Re: Parole letter;
Conf. with Judge Wisch
11/19/98 COORT
11/19/98 TP.lephone Conf. with Pat Robinson, am 0.3
11/19/98 conf. with Greg M�ller and Robert Foran;
Conf. with Judge Wisch; conf. with Client
and his parents in Jury Room; Client plead
guilty to three (3) cases. 5.0
11/23/98 Telephone conf. with Pat Robinson, Client's
mother 0.1
11/24/98 Rev. letter from G. Miller, Re: Parole letter 0.1
11/24/98 Telephone Conf. with Dallas Morning News reporter 0.1
12/2/98 Wrote letter to client 0.4
Number of Court Appearances: 12

'l'otal time expended: l:29. 80 hours
Copy expenses: 799@ .15 = $119. 85
I hope this assists the Court in setting an approprlate fee on

these cases .
Sincerely,
r
9/1/98 Telephone Conf. with Greg Miller 0.3
9/4/98 Rev. letter from Defendant 0.3
9/14/98 Conf. with Woody, Bailiff, Re: arrangements
to bring client to court, use of jury room 0.3
9/13/98 Rev. letter from client 0.3
9/14/98 Rev. file 6.0
9/15/98 Rev. file 3.5
9/15/98 Conf. with Client in Jury Room 3.5
9/15/98 Conf. with Greg Miller 0.3
9/16/98 Conf. with Client's mother 0.1
9/21/98 Conf. with Client's parents 1.8
9/21/98 Conf. with John Beatty 0.3
9/23/98 Rev. letter from Greg Miller 0.3
9/28/98 Telephone Conf. with John Beatty, Attorney for
Co-Defendant 0 ,.
9/29/98 Telephone Conf. with Louis Sturna, Attorney for
Co-Defendant 0.2
9/ 29/98 Conf. with Client in jail 1.5
9/30/98 Telephone conf. with Greg �iller 0.2
9/ 30/98 Telephone Conf. with John Beatty, Attorney 1...,r
co-Defendant 0.2
9/30/98 Telephone Conf. with Louis Sturns , Attorney for
Co-Cefendant 0.2
9/30/93 Telephone Conf. with Client's Mother 0.2
10/ 5/98 Telephone conf. with Greg Miller 0.1
10/6/98 T�lephone Conf. with Greg �iller 0.2
10/6/98 Telephone Conf. with Lorrie, Cou:.:-t coordinator 0.1
1 0/7/98 Telephone Conf. with Lorrie, Court Coordinator 0.2
10/7/98 Telephone Conf. with Greg Miller o . .i
10/7 /98 Telephone Conf. with John Beatty, Attorney for
Co-Defendant 0.2
10/8/98 Conf. with Client in the hold-over cell 0.4
10/8/98 Rev. State's Motion to Stack 0.2
10/8/98 COURT, Hearing on Rejection of Plea Bargain 0.4
10/8/98 conf. with Lui� Sturns, Attorney fer
Co-Defendant 0.6
10/8/98 In Courtroom, Re: co-Defendant Fennell
pleading or not pleading 1.0
10/28/98 Prepared Pre-Trial Motions 6.0
10/30/98 Prepared Pre-Trial Motions 6.0
10/30/98 Rev. letter fro� Client 0.3
11/11/98 Preparation of Pre-Trial Motions nm
11/12/98 Prep. for Trial 4.0
H/13/98 Conf. with Gr2g Miller 0.6
11/14/98 Prep. for Trial 4.0
11/16/98 Went to Clerk's Office and gave them
the Pre-Trial Motions 0.6
11/17/98 Picked up Pre-Trial Motions 0.6
l.1/17/98 Prep. for Trial .•
0
11/17/98 Conf. with Greg Miller 0.4
11/17/98 To Jail: Conf. with Client 1.5
11/17/98 Telephone Coaf. with Defendant's Mother 0.3
11/17/98 Telephone Cont. with Greg Miller 0.3
11/18/98 Rev. faxed letter from G. Miller 0.3
05/08/97 Prepared letter for Client 0.6
05/16/97 Reviewed lett�r from Client 0.3
05/19/97 COURT
05/30/97 Rev. letter from Client 0.5
7/5/97 Researched law s.o
8/10/97 Rev. file; Res. law 6.0
9/15/97 Rev. file; Res. law 6.0
10/17/97 Rev. Setting Notice 0.2
10/30/97 Rev. Pro-Se Motion 0.2
11/6/97 COURT
11/6/97 Conf. with Lorrie, Court Coordinator 0.2
11/ 1/97 Rev. lett�r from Client 0.2
11/10/97 Call to jail 0.2
11/17/97 COURT
11/17/97 To court, conf. with Lorrie 0.6
1/13/98 Conf. with Client in jail 1.5
1/14/98 Rev. Client's Motion for Conflict Declaration 0.2
1/24/98 Rev. Court Setting 0.2
1/30/98 conf. with Gregg Miller, prosecutor 0.4
2/10/98 Wrote letter to Client 0.4
2/26/98 COURT
2/26/98 conf. �ith Judge Wisch 0.3
3/4/98 Telephone Conf. with Lou, DA's office 0.1
3/4/98 To DA's office, offense report 0.8
3/9/98 COURT
3/9/98 Conf. with Judge Wisch 0.3
4/20/98 Rev. offense report 6.0
4/22/98 Rev. offense report 3.0
4/30/98 Rev. offense report 3,0
5/26/98 Rev. Motion of Conflict from Client 0.3
6/11/98 COURT
6/11/98 Cont. with Judge Thorton, Greg Hiller,
John Beatty, and Louis Sturns 1.0
6/22/98 COURT
6/22/98 Conf. With Judge Wisch and Greg Hiller,
prosecutor o.s
6/30/98 Rev. grievance filed by client 0.8
7/8/98 Rev. Grievance filed by Client 0.2
7/10/98 Prepared letter for Client 0.4
07/17/98 Rev. Notion to Dismiss Speedy Td.al
Act from Client o.s
8/19/98 Telephone Conf. with Greg �iller 0.5
8/2 5/98 Rev. lei.ter from Greg Hiller Re: offer 0.3
8/27/�8 Conf. •l'ith Greg Mille,: Re: Taped interview 0.5
8/28/'JS Rev. r,1quest for counsel on three new cases 0.3
9/1/98 conf. ,dth client's Mother 0.3
9/1/98 Conf. ·.J.th Judge Wlach, Re: use of jury room 0,4
'J/1/98 J'lre,:--.i.·e,•\ Jetter. to (:lient 0.6
SANTIAGO �ALINAS
Attorney at law
3311 Nonh Main
Fon Wonh, Toias 76106
AC 817-625-2JJ7
November 24, 1998
Honorable Judge Scott Wisch

372nd District Court
Tarrant county Justice Center
401 w. Belknap
Re: state of Texas vs.
ROBBY ROBINSON
Cause Nos. 0631888A, 0703200A,
0703205A, & 0703209A
Capital Murder
Dear Judge Wisch
A review of my file indicates the following activity on these
cases:
D4t& Description
10/2/96 Telephone Conference with I.on.·ie,
Re: Capital Murder Appointment 0,2
10/3/96 COURT
10/3/96 Reviewed Court Appointment #0631888-
Capital Murder 0.2
10/3/96 conf. with client 0,4
11/16/96 Rev. Setting Notice 0,2
l!/20/96 Conf. with Terry Moor�, ADA, discussed case 0,8
11/22/96 Rev. case o.�
12/20/96 COURT
12/26/96 Telephone Conf. With Terry Moore; cont.
with Judge Wisch; Conf. with client 1.0
01/28/97 Conf. with Terry Moore 1.0
01/28/97 Called jail 0,2
01/28/97 Went to see Client in jail :.i..o
1/29/97 Wrote letter to client 0,4
02/03/97 Prepared letter to Client 0.6
2/10/97 Rev. client's statement 2.0
02/19/97 Prepared letter to Client 0,6
03/25/97 Conf. With Terry Moore 0.6
4/7/97 Rev. Court setting 0.2
05/06/97 COURT
0631888A .,,.
0703200A
No. 0703205A
0703209A
The State of Texas In the 372nd District Court

vs.
ROBBY ROBINSON ___of Tarrant County, Texas
DEFENSE CLAIM FOR SERVICES OR�XPENSES

Offense CauseNo. Check Box If Partial
Ca'1ital Murder 0631888A Payment Requested D
capii:al Murder Qlfil.2
...,0
...:0
,..,A
:,.___
Capital Murrler Q7Q3205A o-

Date of Appt.1 3-96 & 8- 25-98
Murder 0703209A Dato ofDlspo.11-19-98
For ............. nnlu

Non Death Penalty Cases #of days/hours Rate Amount Authorized
Docket Arnearance 10 I 00 I ooo
Non Jurv Disposition 1 2. 00 zoo
Evldontiary Aooearance 1 .100 �00
Jurv Trial
Out ofCourt Time 1 ?O A "-••-� \r.l) ,1.�io
Annellate Work
Death Penalt� Cases

Docket Aoooarance
Evldentia!)'. Aeeean1nce
JurvTrial
Out ofCourt T!me
Annellate Work
'""-----.�oa ct110 �� Total $ 14' �9.1)�
I, Santiago SiilliAiil _, Attorney at Law, swear or affirm to theCourt

(Please Print or Type)
and to theCounty Auditor that they may rely upon the Information contained above to make payment
according to the fee schedule adopted by the Board of Judges pursuant to Article 26.05,C.C.P. effective
August 29, 1997.1 further swear or affirm that I have not received nor will I receive any other mo11ay or
anything else of value for representing the accused, except as otherwise closed to th Court In writing.
Attorney Information (Print):
Name Santiago Salinas BarCardNo. 17536800
Mailing Address 3311 N. Main Fort Worth, Texas 76106
TelephoneNumber ( 8 171625-2337 Soc.Sec.No. 467-72-1249
To: Audttar, TarrantCounty Texas

I, the undersigned Judge ol TarrantCounty, do hereby certify that U1eDefendant Is Indigent and that the
attorney above has been appointed to represent the defendant and has performed servlcn set out above
and that sakl attorney is entitled under Ar1lcle 26.05, TexasCode ofCriminal Procedure, to be paid from e.
General Fund of TarrantCounty,TC'{II for arvtcn performed In the total amount shown aboYe.
Judge, 37 2 � Court __
OC-tlS·CR GPC-1901
0631888A
NO. ______ r
THE STATE OF TEXAS IN THE 372ND JUDICIAL DISTRICT
vs COURT NO. _________
ROBBY ROBINSON TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS
MOTION TO DISMISS
TO THE IIONORABLE JUDGE OF SAID COURT:
NOW COMES the Stile of Texu by ind throush her Criminal District Attorney, and
rNpectfuUv requffta the Court to diln1ila the above entitled and numbered criminal action for
the reuon:
__ OMO! ln1urticient evidence. • (Specify)
XXX DM02 The defendant wu convicted in Cause No. 0?03200A on tbe ___
_
day of _______ ,19 __ ,
__ DM03 The complain Inc whneu h11 requested diamiaal •-· 1rridaYit on rile.
__ DM04 The cue hu been refiled/reindicted u C.1111 No. ______
FILED
__ DM05 The defendant hu never been apprehended. THOMAS A. Wllt,ER, DIST. ti.ERK
TARRANT COUNTY, TtXAS
__ DM06 The defendant ii deceued -·· d.ath certificate on file.
__ DM07 Defendant rranted immunity tor t,1timony. OF.C 2 1 1998
__ OM08 Other •(Specify)
__ DM09 Proaeeution ii barred by the Speedy Ttial Act.
__ OMI0 The defendant hu been placed in the deferred prONCution procram.
��
THlS DISMISSAL IS "WIIBOOr PREJUDICE." SEE "MU'ITEN PLFA BARGAIN �."
WHEREFORE, it ii prayed 1h1t the above entitled and numbered cauM be (!iamllMd.
Rnpecttully 11Jbmitted,
TIM CURRY
CRIMINAL DISTRICT ATTORNEY
TARR.ANT OUNTY, TEXAS
j
/�--r�-
ASSISTANT CRIMINAL DISTRICT A'ITORNEY
Gregory T. Miller
State Bar No. 14073650 �
Th, ror.. oin tilion hnin1 been pr-.nted to mt on tbil the 2. \ day or
�
Q:4.g,M V , A. D. 19 "0 ,111d th• same hi.,ln1 been contidend, ii ii
tbtrefort ORDE RED, ADJUDGED tnd DECREED that uld above entitled ud au■IIIK� c
be ind tbt ,..- ia bert�y ciiamlaed. UI'llDJl' PR&JUOICE
CER .. tF ICATE a;: P R O C E E D l � G S
[:
,..
j);J/02
• C:
Jd/MYt!ittlldJ� d/Me.-1/�J�:ioolf -h�-�
3'/2,,�
� {)h?;;,;_4p-/Vvlt(Jl,Lrp/'dfd.
� : "l
N
'"□• 0..
of..Nlli.,."-'� �IIGll 1•
_,,--.. ,-,;\f \11c• ,..»
....._
F:::,..,,.,,.=,,"o"o,a-'::...,�-...,....,"""-,r'-"�"'-....:....:;...___
NB(lrtT.\l4'11h�
C(l"tl t,£VP4t '"

ii
i5 r:,.,=11"","0,:-:,------,-,,-�.,,..,,_=:-:,--:.,., ...-,-------------------------'-------------f
-----------------------------------=-----===---------J
IS THE USE Of SUffl.EMENT 11£QUlll£D OM THIS INCllllNT? Yf:S NO (J O
MAIL TOP COPY TO: TEXAS DfMRTMUiT Of PUil.iC SAFETY PO IGX 4143 AUSJIN TX fflU.4143
w.ll-'RR(ST RCPORTl1',G SHCCT YIUN-,_OSECUTOII •CPOIITI� SH[( T
STATE V'S. ROBBY JAY R llNSON Multi-PwgcT"' taped- I
HEARING ON GtnLTY PLa..AS VOLUME I OF I
I
tapcd1 11 17:17 TX1,1 26:21 w1tnc:1scs1>1 s. 1 .•. :
Tarrant1111 1:8.15,25 typewritten IIJ 26 9 words 111 20.4
13,10 14·2,l2 16:5 24.21
-u-
workcd111 l-2
26 2.!,19
Worth1>1 I 16.19 26·21
t.:ndcr 111 10·13
ultjm.tcly 111 4 13 writc111 6:15
term 121 13'2 15:17
uncustoJy111 �1:5 writing1s1 3.19 8 s, 8
terms 121 5:7 10:7 10:22 24,1
tcstificd111 11:1 under121 6·25 26.9
writtcn112 1 4.4.16,17 6 1
1•
tc1tify1 1 4.9.10.14 5·16 undcntud 121 1 3 16 6.17 8:4 10·8 12:t>.16
S:,6 6:9 IS:�.21.72.22 5:20 •l:S 8:18 9:16 11:15
11:J�.22 12:16.20 136 22:1I> 23:7 24: I
testimony1,1 2'7 1 3 9 13.,8 1s:1,6.2J.:5 16··1.9
13:20 14:1.6.11 i.1:21 l(,•1.l,15 17:22.25 18 I -x-
22:22,22 19 4,13 20:2.7 21:7
Tcxu 111 1 1·4.8.16.19.25 undcnt.nda 121 7:l X111 2:1
2'6 4:18 12 3 13:11 14.2 8 13
14.12 15:11 17·19 '4.S -Y-
25:7 26:1,5,19 undcntood111 6:15
unindicted111 4:12 ycup1 IS 18
Tlwlk 1,1 18.24 21·25
25:17 unit111 17:19 y..a.� 161 3 l3,13,l2 8 12
United111 5:23 8 19 24·4
thereafter111 26:9
yoursclf111 6:'ll 14 17
thcn:forc111 20 unlc11111 153
---
__-!·
third111 8:7 unlikely II I 5:5
lbornton111 17:lh ur.n:lated II I I �-11
thorough I I I 16:23 untruthfully11 5 17 I 17) I 4.5.6,-,8 2.U ,2
thrcatc-..cd121 7:1 9:18 ur. 1'1 3: 14 5:7 6:21.23
thrcc1u1 3:12,22 S 2S ·21 13:4 16:6 19 24 21:5
9:15 11:13 12:4,14.17 uacd1•1 3:2: 9.19 1◄ 11
17:20,21 23.25 24:16 25 2,4.5
through()) 10.6 11.21
24:20 -v-
Thunday111 2 2 vari'>ua 11 1 7:13
I
.imcly ;11 2:14 verbal Ill '0.13
1 ;rLOth) :•! 13.22 verbally . 11 3.20 8·10
tiM111 4:4 vcnu� 111 2:6
today11 11 4.19 6:1.24 I
vicwpoint11 1 22 21
7:14.22 10:21 17:4.23
19:11 22.6.12 villit111 17:6
today's Ill 6·3 !7:12 vi■ \•-4:d 111 19:8
24:20 •1oid111 P:i◄
Tony111 1◄:22 VOLUME121 1:2.2
totall;,i11 20 21 voluntarily Ill 6 14 7·9
18 12 19:14 22:10
irallleribcd II I 18" IS
transcript111 18:7 VS111 I.�
tnDICription121 26·7
26:11 -w-
tr1111portcd121 24:14 W 111 26:20
24:21
1waive111 7 24
trial IIJ l · .l 2.5 5· I7 6:7 w1ivcd1•1 1.11.... ,
7 16 19:5,6 H:7 17.24 25:12
trials 121 4:10,14 ,niving 111 22. 7
trickcd111 9.19 W1vcn111 14:8
tricd111 4.13 wea l• I 3·25 4:1
mac11J 7::i 13:13.23 lS:19 25·2., •
18: I J 23:5,9.11 26.6 weck111 19·8
truly-11 26:1� willii.a 111 10:22
tr111ty111 21:5 WiKb121 1:22 14·23
trutbflllly 11 1 4:9,14 Wiacb'a111 1 7 1.10
trypJ 6:11 15:20 Niabc2,1 10·14 16:24
twclVC(JI 12.15.25 21:17 witbout111 S:JS
two1•1 4·258:5 Jl:16,lt witacllt4J 10:19 11:6
Jl:18 17:16 18:25 26:14
DBRRA MAIN, CSR

(117) 114-2996
STATE VS. ROBBY JAY lNSON null - tapcn:corded
!r
™
HEARING ON OUILTY PLL-AS

Multi-Page
VOLUME I OFJ
null II J 17:24 Parolc111 1 19:25 prom1sc111 10:6 reporter's11 1 1:1 2:14 :;cpuau:a fl1 2 l :2
numbcr171 2:8,11 12:15 put 1◄1 4:6 5:14.20 15:25 promiscd11 1 7:2 23:10 SCl'VC(Jl 24:15,23
12:25 13:9.25 14:10 participation1>1 3:1 prosccutc11 1 5:18 reprclC'Ut■tion1116:19 set fJJ J 9:4.5
numbcred11 1 1:21 1 0:3 12:7 provisions111 4:17 requcst1JJ 20:9 21:4 shall I11 20:21
numbcn 1◄1 3:4 4:� parties Ill 7:1 12:2 l�:18 PSl 11120: 18,19 21:3 require IJJ 6:8 12: 1 Shcriff111 24:13
23: 12.25 p1rty 1111 4:l.2 12:7,l1 punishmcnt1•1 2:11 req11in:d1Jt 24:16 25:6 Shorthand !JI I:23
12:20 13:14,15.16.18.23 3:1 1 .16 8:6,8.14 requirements11 1 10:15 26:17
13:24 14:4,5,8.9.14 25:4
punishment-hearing rcspcctivcm 5:7 24:15 11how 111 23:11
pass 11 1 18:25
-0-
0111 2:1 Ill 22:22 responding111 7: 1 4 1idc111 25:14
oath111 11:7 p■.�t12119·8.18 purposes 1>1 2:4 10 14 rcs n,ibility1413:1 side■ flI 22:22
pen11 1 21:13 I 17:24
objcctioo Ill 4:2� 5:9 4: � 10:2.23 aign111 o:24
obscrvin:w1 7:13 f'CD■lty (JI 8:7 15:2 i :,ursu1nt11 1 12:2 responsible11 1 4:2 airn■tun: 141 2l:5.10, 1 7
OCC.Uf(IJ 16•)l penitcnti■rypJ 3:!4 JIUrsu�· Ill l�:7 re1t JIJ 22:23 26:14
15.11 20:1' p'.11 Jl) 5:4.8 20:10 21:2.4 rc&IN JJJ 16: I 4 22:25
off11 1 2:1 I signe d 1• 1 4:18 S:25 6:4
person111 ◄.1 putting I I J 20:24 6:16 8:9 10:21 12:<I IS:21
offonsc11•1 2:22.23 3.3 rw:1ultcd11 1 14:16
4.1 5:19 9:1.1.6.7.11 penon1lly 1,1 12·!�.i� - 22:5
reward111 9:24
11:19 12:12 19: 1 8 23·)5 pen-0ns1115 I right(lt) 2:4.21 4:24 5:13
significant 11117:9
23·16,19 25:3,(.6 penuadcd , 1 1 7.2 5.18 6:24 ,1:24 10:1,20.23 silent1216:24 10:24
-Q-
questions 12 1 1 8:22
offenses 1,1 3:2 4:8 10-3 Phooo 12 1 1:16, 1 ' 21·)9 11:24 12:22 13.8 15:20 six !JI 22:8.8
11:17 1':7,8 picc.�s 111 22:8 18:18 20:6 2):1,13 25:i7 aolcly Ill 1 6:14
quick 111 22.1
Officc:111 21:13 placc111 20:19 rights 1s1 6:21,2l 7:9,10 somctimc11 1 16:4
officcr111 20 18 22:7
placed 12 1 23·5.25 -R- I0:111117.24
Official1 ◄1 1:24 26.4 14 p:ca 1H 1 2.5,15.24 �;o Robby1,> 1 1·8 2:7,6 11:5 speak 14
1 5:8 15:JS 16: 15
26:18
OtlC (IDJ 4:11 5:8 6·6.12
4.'1,6.)5,17 5.7,12,1 ,.20
6:2.Jj,17. 18.20.�2 7.3 d·5
IR
1,1 2' I
range 1s1 3:11.16 8.6.f,
I 1.11.12 13:10 14:1.11
19:4 23:4,11,13
19:10
ipccific1114:16
10:3 11:16 19:20 20.9,15 9:2.7.11 lll 2,7..<.9.11.15 8·14 Robcrt121 1 :14 13.13
111 4:8,11
21.16 12:16,23 13.2 15:4.25 rcachcd111 2.24
I Robiaaon11t 1 I ·8 2:7.7 apccitically
6:23.2.� 7:3 12:6 13:1
one's111 7:1 16.6,2, 1 ,25 19:10.13 22:7 re1dp 1 2:11 6.15 24.1! �:21 3:� 8::� 0:20 l 1:5
17:17
22:l�.16.16,2213:7.14 ll·!l,12.15 U.l(. 14:2
opca 1s1 6.1.10 22:6.12 reading 1117:25
1
23: 15.19.20.2) :4:J.7.9 14:11 22:223:1,4,1;,I! 1pcat111 2◄:18

22:17 ready11 1 21:14
plcarl 171 2:25 3 21 4:22 oom1J1 17•'7,IO .,-cts111 18 :JJ
opinion;11 7:16 5:1 7·1:!9 1 0 12·1 real111 22:1 1 aquan,111s-s
1Ulct 11121 5
oppo::1unity111 7:21 reu?n1z1 9-16 2◄:8
pieading11 1 9.14,22 run12 1 3.24 24:17 stud111 7.15
oral 111 18:7 17:22 rccc1vc111 322
ord:::ru1 20:18.21 25:J ________ statc11JJ 1:4.14,14,16.17
pie ads II) 2:'I received Ill 7:20 2:6 ):2 4.18,24 5:l7 �-·
?rdcrcd \II 24:J I ----"' ---- 1 0:13.17 11:J O ;2:3,11
-s-
picas 1•1 l:l\J,21 2:1,6 5:tlrccitcd111 14:23
original1r1 R:16 16:8,14 5: 2.10 12:2 26.8 S11 1 2:1 12:24 20:1.11 22:12,24
rccommt11dationi1J 26.J.J2
23:I (i 24· 19 pied111 14:25 2◄-12 SaliDU)))J 1:17 2 ·9. 19
originally 1s1 2:21 8:5 poiat 1,1 2:15 2:20 3:6.7 4:IS,20 7:JI Statc'11Jt 20:22 21:3
rccordiui l:l 7:•� 8_4 7:17 8:2·1 :.is 17 ,v:JJ
8.25 9:6 23'13 12 .22·24 11 3 2 '2 :14 statcmcatrs1 18:2.8,JO
police 111 18 3 · ,, · • 10:16 12:5.23.25 ll :5 18:16 21:12
overall111 18:17 23.2. 0 24 1226 1 1
s ition11 1 12:11 16:22 17.8.12 18:21 19.1
-P-
- po
possibility11 1 t9:9 rccor
�
n:duccd111 �
Ill 4 19 7- 4 24:2 1�3 21: 10,23 22:25 24:10 Statc1111 5:23
2s:s. 1 1,15 stay1ag11125:18
possiblciJJ s:n t5:8 1tcp111 22:t
P11 1 2:1 n:fi lc11 1 � 1a SANTIAG011 1 1· 1
i,rc•iudicciiJ 5:IS still111 10:24
p.m l' I 2'3 4.5 6:2 17:7 prep n:fleet12 1 22.1◄ 25:1 s■tisficd 1,1 6.19 7:8
1
� arcdlZJ 2.12•13 8:1� stop11111.22

25:19 12:15
prcaeace11 1 2'2 11 ;,...,:9 rcllc:ctcdpJ ntu · fyingr•,
· t0:14 • 1y1.....a
-111 2:6 4:3 6:I
packct111 21:13 23.9 rcflcclll ·, 1 26:12
Page 111 2:4 n:fUIC tl) $;16 l¼'dclWhilc!IJ 13:1) ll&btcc:1'08(1) 25.6
pre1CDt111 2:3
pages Ill 18:16 22:9 26:6 Prca
iding 111 1·22 rcfuscdtl l 5.6 Scott11 1 1 :22 such1JJ 12:1 24:lO
p■pcrJII 22:8 pre triaill) 7:13 17:1) regard1s1 13:8,25 14 10 acat11122:18 l 1llpCIViJioa\11 26:10
pl.pen 111 12:4 ;6:21 I
19.9 15:9 18:2 IC&tcdlJI 10:19 22.20 1upcct111 5·5
'l2:15 pruoa111 17.19 rcgardia& 111 22'2) acctiOD (I) 25:9 IWOR (JI 23.5,7
rapcrwo1k1J1 6:16 pn·aoaen1121:2 Rcgardlcu1118:16 ICC(II 22:3 IWOl'll(9l 11:2,613:9�
10:21 rciaforcc111 20·22 2L3 acck111 15:20 14:1.6.11 23:8.9
I r obQ 'll 16:J
·,1&ra&raph111 21:11 � l'CIDIUll1l 6:2◄ 10·24 scada111 21: 1 3
COWC(2) 25:i '0
p�dr1111•1 9.2J 24:21 ICl'.1(11 20:ll -T-
procced 11 1 3:31 1:1 8
PuuuDII'! 19.24 l6: ll mDUldtJJ :4:8. 1 3 acalncll11J 3:12,22 24:4 tablo11122:20
pMCDll(ll 17.8 H:11 proc:eediag11 1 3:20 llEMEMBEllf' ,,1 24:8.15,18 15:1 taba111 25: 1 3
19:14 1 l:25 17:12 1:20 IClltcacca(41 3:24 5:13 takiJta1114:25 5:9 12.17
pa-:w:>.le ill lv:23 7'J J :noc:cicdi1181 (SJ I :.!2 Rcponcr1sJ 1:23.24 26:4 24:16.23 UlpO(II 18:6
21:7 26:17, 18 Scatcacn111112:12
�-------- --________, 7: I 3 15:19 26:7.12 tapc-n,conW,1,1 II:�
j
DE91lA MAJN, CSR INb '•
(IH 'I) II\N-J.996
------------�----------
STATH VS. ROBBY JA"i R 'INSON Multi-Page ™ death- DOW

HF.ARING ON GUILTY PLa.,,S VOLUME 1 OF 1
acath 1,1 8:7 12•19 13:12 CllCCUIC111 22 10 G111 2:1 tndividual1111 12:19 le1sc:r1113·3 8:11 9:1.7
13'22 14:3.7.14.1 6 IS 21 ediibitcd11 325 25:2 gentlemc:011 1 2s:11 14:20 11 :18 23:14,16 1
, 9
1
Debra 1> 1 I:2326:4, 17 25:5 given Ill 18:11.13 20 12 innuenee11 1 9:19 life1•1 3.IH6.12.19
Dc:c:embcr111 26:1 s ellhibits111 26 12 : Glass121 14 21 1512 informp1 l !:14,16 1 6.� likcwi■e111 13:20 14:1
deci1ion11 1 16·13,1 7 Cllpectcd 11 1 16 25 gone1J I 16·20 1821 inmatc111 20·21 I I; 11
19:15 Expires1 11 26 23 inquircd11 1 13:1 liVCIJI 5:7 16· 6
good11 1 12 10
Dcfc.1dant1141 1: 19 2·5 Cllplanation111 5 Institutional1s1 3:23 located111 20:12
2 3,8 3 10.18 52.22.2 4 4 GREC111 1.14
Griffin 171 4 11.22 5.6 20 20 24:S.14,22
7.7,23 M 20.23 9·4.9,13
9·17.21.25 IO.S.10,17 1, 9 -F- 14 22.24 I55.22 intt:nd111 6.14 -M-
11.1,2,6 20.24 21 ·8 22·13 facc111 2H iutcntiorq11 15:2'1
gu1rantce111 19.23 1 mailing111 26:20
22:IS,20 23:3.11 25.3 gue11 t>J 7.18 8. 4 17·16 intcntion1lly1•1 1312 •�ain1,1 1:18.23 26.4,17
factt•I S:I 9 IS 14.17
Dcfend1nt'1 111 2:6 IS:20 guilt 1•1 6 24,2510.23 13:21 14:7,13
. Malcom,,, 4.1 1 s.s
Dcfen■e111 222s flCU(II 21 12 12.7 involved IJI 14:18.20 14:�2 .:.4 15:5
delivered11 1 24.22 fashion 111 2 15 guilty t>11 1:10.21 ,.I.2s !nvolvcmcnt111 q-7 marked 121 44 6:2
dehuivc111 9.23 3:21 7.159:2.3.4,8.8.9.12 IIIUC:111 13.5 material111 16:20
f1thcr1Jl 17:319:22
Dcpartmcnt1• 1 2 4 S 9.12,13.14,15,20.22,21 itcmfJ I 12:15.24.25
Fu IJ I 1 .16.19 10 II 12 l l,2u 1 4 25 mattcn111 11 :9
deputies 111 7 14 felony (JI 8.9 25.3 17 22 23.14,15,19,20.21 May1>1 1311 14:3,12
detective, ,,1 17: I� 18 8 Fennell Il l 4 12.22 56 26 8 -J- mean, 1z1 5: IS 19.19
18:12 14:22.24 15S.22 Jamc1111 1◄. ◄ �tally111 6·13
din:ctoru, 20:20 24 14 filc111 4 4 6J,17 -H- J1y111 1.8 2.7 11 :5,11 middle flI 23:2
24:22 23:3,4,11.13
filcd11•1 4 3 : ,196 �. l6 handcd1JJ 12 2316·1◄ Millcr11 •1 1:14 2'8,8,11
din:ctl (I'. 20•1 9 10 17:1320 19 239 2 17 5.310:18 11:3,9
;\ 8 hcar� 111 i.2 l 6 12 18 6 Joc111 14:7
disc111•1J1 7 2 1 17. 9 I 'I 25 21 .24.25 22.24
l:l0.21 2· 1 joint111 24:7
discu,scd 111 6:21 19.9 Fin11!ym 14·10 24.25 �-��ft J udgc,,, I:22 2·1 l 4:20 25:16
;.
di1mi11111 514 finding(JJ 325 19.19 hereby 111 26 5 1 4 2317:7,10 20.S 21·20 mine111 1 9·16
di1m.i111l111 2 .13 �nc111 8.22 21:23 1110Dtbp1 14·2S
holding111 22'3
di1mi1::cd111 2:10.1◄ f1ncd111 3·14 � udgmcnt111 25:1 morning111 13,1
Honor11 1 no 31 s 4
66 fini1h111 21 20 7'1 I 8 2 i1 25 24 1 0 judicial11• 1 l 4.24 4 21 motbcr111 17-3
District,,, I:6.1 S.2 4 4 25 5'9 6·2S 12 S 23-8 motioos1■1 ;7 13.16.17
firc111 12.18 Honorablc1•1 1· 14,14 26·5.18
21:13 2 6·S,18 1 .17.22
17 20 2, 1.23.2) 19:9
fircarm121 12.18 14·1 7 Juli111111�·115·17 14 22 mwtiplc111 22.9
Diviaion,,, 3 23 20 20
fint Ill 2 II 15 17 honoring111 ll 3 15 9.19 20 12 21:,
24 S, 14,22 murdcr1u1 2 23.23 3:4
docwnccu 111 s 2s 6:1 firat-dcgn:,c III 8.9 hopc11 1 9:23 �ury ,,, 6:6 11.1,10 19 s )1. 1,21 5: 198.6.12 9. 1.2
6:4 8.9 22:),6,8,11 fivc1•1 3138 12.13 hoUICd Ill 20 21 19·5 9 6.7,11 11.17.19 15:1 1
1 2:19 J111tice1JJ I IS 24 6 1518 23:1 3.16,19.20.23
doc■n't111 20.24
noo, 111 26 20 2324
donc121 15:17 20:23 +
follow 1• 1 4 21 6 20 10.1 my'1111 IS 19
down Il l 16 14 22.2 identificd111 22.15 -K-
1 0.9 24 3.11
duly111 11:6 11111 4 11 kept (11 21.1
folluw1ng1z1 1 ;21 2:15
during111 2s 2 immcdi1tcly111 23 6 Key 12 1 l◄-21 IS 1: 2
-N-
follows111 11·1 1>1
implicllle111 4.9 killiD&111 1 1421 N 1·t8 2·1.t
Foran 1>1 1:14 IS .19 16 7
-E- implicatcd111 5'2 new Ill 253.4 IWDC1•1 11.10.11 23-2.S
forcc111 9:19
Et>1 2 1. .1,I imprc11iou111 7 12 Knowi11g111 16:22
forccd111 7 2
23'.9,II
improper 11, 919 kDowiugly121 6:14 a-.d111 4 25
Earlr11 14.14 foregoing 11I 26 6
CUCtl l 8 324 24 include 11 1 6.17 20·24 14.IJ urrat.ivc111 J8·17
form121 21:12 26:9 lnwwlcdgc111 18·11 ncccuuily111 2·11
Edwarda111 14:14 i11CludcdIll 3 l 9.1.7
formaJ 111 7 25 I1·18 132 2314.19 IICCiCUU1 I II 4.23
cithcr111 25.14 forma111 i2. 4 includina Ill 6'.S -L· acitbcr121 2 0 5.7
eligible t IJ IQ•24 Fort1>1 1:16.1926 21 incrimi11atc111 6·23 Lacey!') 1 44 acxt111 22:18
Enaliab111 6·1 5 fortbcoming111 15.18 ind.icatedt1 1 6 4.11 late 11 1 251 8 aoacdlclcaa I II I no
cnter111 6:14 follDdt•I 12.11 19·17
l1w 1•1 1.18 7 I 916 llfJi 111 )I ; )
CDtcn:d1,1 J 25 6.15 fourth111 19 20 indicates 111 4 6 1'108111 I 3
12-2 19 14 231 0.11 11·2512:2 24·16
frcc111 16 7 indicted 111 3.S 9 6.11 l1 rr•1 6.10.1610 21 DCMI 111 17 6
Cllablilbcd I I I 1 2:) frccl 1•1 6:14 7·9 1 8 11 11:1 6 1 6 K 21� Nodua&111 21 .2s
cvcaina111 1 3.10 18. 1 r19 13 22.10 iDd.ic:t111ent11ei 9·10.12 lcutt>I 17.1318.7 19:19
12 S : S I! 21 6.4 aoticc,,, 4·21.25 5-9
�t 1 froat111 223 11 1 3 JJ.9 14.10 16 8,14
23: I 7.22.24 lepl l>J 5.25 22.1 24.e
cvid0Dcc121 22.�J 26:13 fwl t>J 7:24 JO.I 26·6
1
20-.ll
qally111 4·2 · IM'tif1111 III 20'.2:>
lauwaatioa14I 2:1,9 flillly111 7.151 0 1 iDd.ic:tmcDtl (71 2:6 7:20
11:1 19:2 7 21.2512·1 1518 236 lcaida111 22:9 IIOtify III l0· 2l
fulllJCIII ll:IS lcastby111 11.15 Nc>%adur,.,. 1:11.lO
umplc111 5:1 6 iad.ividul 111 3:11
12:11 13:1 ),21 ,22 1 4:4.7
l:2,2 4.5 19'5.6
rcxcblqc111 6·22 lca111 3:12
-0- 14·'4 IIOWIII 15:20
DBBRA MA.IN, CSR

(117) 114-2996
1
STATE VS. ROBBY JAY� INSON Multi-Page "' #07220600 - dealt
4 2 .1 2 121 25:8,9 agn:ed Ill 24:9 Boctcher111 1 7:1� conditicn11 1 13:2
HEARING ON GtnLTY PLL-iS VOLUME 1 OF I
-#- _______ agreeing 12 1 4:22 22:7 bn:a ch111 1 5:4 conditions111 4:3
#072 201\00 fl I I: 14 -5_-___ agn:mnc11t121I2:163:2 bribed 1IJ 9:18 confession 1s1 6:25 12:5
3 : 21 4:4,6,16,1 7,23 5:1 2 bring 121 6:8 16:5 17:17 1 8:4 23:8
#14073650111 1:14 5:2012 1 4:5 6:2
_____
5: 14, 2 1 6: 18,20,22 7:4 confined111 15:11
#17536800111 1:17 5:30 Ill 2:3 1 0:7,8.9 12:16,23 22:16
brought121 6:7 13:1
#24311 1 26:22 24:1.2.3,7,9.13 Bart111 4:11 5:17 14:22 confinement121 3:23
- 15:9,10,19 20:12 21:2
___-...:6:....___ 1 15:4 confront 121 6:9.9
24:4
6:0� 111 25:19 ahead ill 21:9

ag rccm cntsr1
constitute ll 1 26:6
allegation111 13:23
-c-
$10,000()) 3:14 8:12 6thJ11 26:20
-$-
consultation111 19:14
8·21 allegations1,1 2:9 9:12 C111 2:1
13:8,13, 25 calendar IIJ 19:20 contained1•1 4: 11 7:3
:1:24 24:1
alone121 19:15,16 calls 111 2:4
703200A 121 2:22 9:5
-7-
along 121 5:12 17:�3 cannot11 1 20:4 8:1 0
-0-
0631888(21 2:5.1 2
contemporaneously
703205A fl1 2: 23 Alvin11 1 4:11 capital111 2:22,23 5:19
063181J8All1 1:3 703209A 121 3:5 8:7 contcnt(IJ IR:17
8:5 9:1.6 1 1:1 7 15:1 8
fl)
0703200A 141 I :3 2:5 amount111 17:9 control11 1 21:6

1 76106111 1:19 care111 25:1 3
13:9 23:14 amplc111 7:21 coopcratc111 4:13
'16196121 1·16 26:21 Anthony 1•1 4:1� 5:6 Carter11J 13:22
0703205A ]SJ 1:3 2:5 copies121 7: 20 19:9
8:25 14:! 23:18 ------- )4·24 15:5 CISC(t] 2:13 3:15,17,23
copy111 21:12-15
nnticipate111 15:3 .1 9 5:18 10:24 J3:25 16:18
0703209A 1'1 I:3 2:6 19:4 correct 1u1 2:17 4:20 7:5
-8-
9:10 14:10 23:22 817111 26:21 1 6·3
cases11'1 2 :.,6 3:12 6: 5 7:22 9:24.25 1 0:4,9, 24
817.625.2337111 1:19 appcalJ11 5:13 6: l 2 7:o, J9 S:l.1 4, lH:lS
12:8 9 13:1 4 15 23 24
817.625.2380111 1:19 14:15 1 7:4 l(l:1°1,17 19:11
1' 13
10:12 11:13,1 7, 1 812:14 19·12
817.884.1695(1) 1 :16 ' '20 20·! . '13 26·7
·
S111
12:18 1 4:1 6 17:14 19:5
-1- APPEA RANCE
I 121 1:2,2
10111 2:6 817.884.3333(1! 1:16 apphes Ill 3:17 C&USC8(7I 1 :21 3:22 corrcctly121 14:23 26:12
884-2996111 26:21 appointed1i1 2 5:I I 2 2:17 24:3.11,25 26:8 COStli (II 25:12
12111 2:8 arrangements111 19:IO Centcr111 1 ·15 counsel (41 7:8,24 20:18
- -- --- .
12-3 1-98111 26:23 - lnwSt111 24:1 9 22:20
-9 - ccrtainly[IJ 15:17
13th111 26·.1 4 Arti::le111 25:6 <;Ount111 17:1 3
CCrt'f ' tc Ill 2:14
I IC&
14th(J) 13:11 1 4·2,12 9911 1 3:138:12.19 aspectJ11 16:6 County11 11 1:8,15, 25
19111 1:11 2:2,2
Certification12 I 26,22 13:11 14:2,!2 16:5 24:21
-A-
assessed iii 2:II 26:23
1990 1 •1 13:II l 4:3.i 3 26:2'5'19
1:1 5 J 1:23 26:1 7
1 9:18 COurtlCflJ 25:5
above-captioncdJ11 IJSUOICllJ 12:10 15'8 CCrtl Y121 26:6,II
Assistant11 1 Certificd12
19961•1 1 6:9,14 1 7:18 26:8 i5:io
·r court1721 1:3,6,24,24 2:4
18·12 cbairi11 1 0:19 2:4,14,111.21 3.8.11,!9
. I ed Pl 1 :21 assurancesI2I 20:10.13 cbarge1,1 5:15 8:12,16 4:18,21 ,24,255:11,ll,23
1998 1 1:11 20 2:2 2 4: 5 ac e t 1 3:1 :7 10:8
26:1 / ' • 1 assun:11I 21:14
abovc-ent1t
9:8 1 5:12 23:16 5:25 6:1.7,IO 7:8,1 2.18
IO:ll,23 23:15, 20, 23 24:2 charged171 2:22 4:1 3 8:5 7:24 8:3.4,9,1 6,18,2),24
attomey111 1:182:24
c p 1,
199911 16·4 9:5,10.1 4.1 8,22 10:t.6. 6
acccp�d111 24:12 6:47:1 91 2:25 22:IJ,19 8:25 11:1 2 23:23,24
19th i�1 1.·20'4.·5 according111 1 7:6 IO:l l . l7.2o ll:3 i9:I
1ttomcy's12 1 6:19 21:13 cbargcs141 2:25 8:6.1 9 20:18,19 11:1 .9,2412:1,6
.
act1ngJ11 13: 5 24:20
Attomcys11J 1:15 22:12,14.17.21 23:1,4,JO
addcndum111 21:3 autjmatiCJIJ 8:6 citizen11J 5:23 24:11,24,25 25:1,9,ll.17
-2-
2121 25:6, 9 addition fll 4:16 aware IIJ 17:1 4 clerk 141 7:1 4 22:12 23:5 26:4,5,18,1 8
20 ( 1) 2:9 additional121 4:6 24:20 awhile pi 1 0:22 2�:IO Court'11•1 2:5,156:3,1 7
24(If 18:1 6 addrcss111 26:20 _______ chcnt1,1 4:18 7:8.12 8:11 courtroom111 14:25
25 (JJ 2:11,12 26:6 admitpJ 6:24.25 10.)3 8 :13 13
-8- crcdit11 1 24:18
•?:
27121 2:1 4 1 7:13 11 dmittc d tlJ 26:13 ----"---- C 11,:nt 8(1) 21 :4 Cnnun
· • a) Ill 24:S 25.7.
Barill. .
admitting111 12:6 . 1 14•1 4 '17 C lOSC(tJ 22:23 2S:JO
barg:11n12,1 2:24 3:20 20:25 21:4
., _ _ . hmc nts1,1 2:5 4-4 16 1 7 5·.1 2 14 20 6·18 1 closcdi21 croaa"i:&aminc:Jil 6·.10
6:2,18 8:5 22:1 6 23:8 closes111 _22:25 custody1,1 20:25 21 :4
-3-
�- 10111 2.5 6;20,22 7:3 JO'.s 2:1 6'.23
awuun1s
adviscd1s1 2:24 3:19 D:3 15:4 16:1 , 6.24 1 1:1 co-con1p1rators111 14:13,1 9,21
i
30th (2) 19:5,6 4:12
7:1 9 8:11 10:21 19:10 22:7,1 6
3'\I I Ill 1:18 co-dcfcndants111 4:IO
affirmsp1 22:17 baqtains11J 5:7
372nd14J 1:4.24 26:4.18 25:'l,9
afternoon1•1 11:15,11 based IJJ 23:14.18 24:7 Codc121
-D-
3:55 (I) 17:7 D111 2:1 ,1
16:21,22 17:◄.M 17:6 cocrccd1�1 7:1
3g (2) 25:6.9 again111 5:19 bebalf1,16:813:5 1 7:1 4 commt1S1on111 25:2
bcganilJ
date (SI 5:6 6:3 9:24 24: 1 9
_ DA111 21.6
against 1s1 4:9 6:99:20 Belknap 111 26:20 competent121 6:13 7:15 24:20
---◄-'----- 15:5,19 ben:fitpJ 9:24 COIICCl'lllll) 20:15 dea,lly1,1 3:24 19:111
401 (II 26:20 aggravatcd111 19:18 hllat,21 18:io,14 concludcd111 25:19 25:2,3,5
4212) 3:22 24:4 ago1,1 7:20 10:22 14:25 concunently121 3:24 dcaliniil (I) 7:13
blind,11 JS:IJ
42·yc&r(4J 5:1 3 24:12 agrcr. 121 4:8 6:23 Beard111 1 9:24 24:17 dealtr11 11:11
24:1 5.16
DBBRA MAIN, CSR Index Page I
(817) 884-2996
STATE VS. ROBBY JAY R,. ,INSON Multi-Page ™ VOLUME I OF I
HEARING ON GUILTY PLLrtS NOVEMBER 19, 1998
Page 26
I STATE OF TEXAS I
2 COUNTY OF TARRANT I
3
4 I, Debra Main, Oflicinl Coun Repor1Cr for the 372nd
S Judicial District C.oun of Tarrant County, Texas, do hereby
(
6 certify that the foregoing 25 pages constitute n full. true,
7 and .:nm>11 tranrcription of the procccdings bod in the
8 Hrn· 1g on Picas �f Guilty of the above-captioned causes;
9 thcn:aftcr, reduced to typcwrit1c11 fonn by me and under my
10 supervision.
II I further certify that this L"llnscription of tlic record
12 of the proceedings truly and correctly n:flccts the exhibits,
13 .
if any, admincd into evidence.
fil�"',.�=
14 WITNESS MY OFFiCIAL SlGNA Tl/RE on thia 1he, 13th day nf
IS l')eccmbcr, 1998.
15
17 'ti� .
- r.a��
18 Coun
19 Tarrant County, Texas
"°' . 11e1w,61h6196/1oof
r:"1ll(\.',ad..,_
rm�':tiffll
20
21
22 Sla&e Cenifiudon 120
23 Ccltification Expira: 12·31 ·98
24
25
DBBRA MAIN, CSll l1 Page 26 . Page 26

(817) 884-2996
STATE VS. ROBBY JAY RMINSON Multi-Page ™ VOLUME I OF I
HEARING ON GUILTY PLT.'Js NOVEMBER 19, 1998
Page 22 Page 24
I THE COURT: Just real quick before you step back I written pica agccmcnt as contained in writing and filed in
2 down, Mr. Robinson. 2 the : ecords or this ca:ise, I wil accept the agreement,
3 You sec all these documents I'm hold:ng in fro11t or 3 follow the agreement, and therefore in each of these causes I
4 me? 4 will S<.'Olence you to 42 years confinement in the
5 That's your signature. You signed all these 5 Institutional Division or the Texas Department of Criminal
6 documents that I've talked to you about in open court today 6 Justice.
7 waiving your rights and agreeing tc, this pica bu.rgain in 7 Based on the joint trial and plea agreement, I will
8 these six pieces or paper or six legal documents, should I 8 remand •· well, any legal reason why I shoulrln't sentena, him
9 say, all or which arc multiple pages in length, and is that 9 since I agreed to follow the pica agreement?
10 }'OU( si1,'llatur.: and dad you freely and voluntarily execute all 10 MR. SALINAS: Ne,, Your Honor.
11 these documents in the presence of your attorney and the 11 TIIE COURT: In each of these causes as rear! into
12 clerk and the State and rm in open court today? 12 the record, having accepted the 42-ycar recommendation and
13 TIIE DEFENDANT: Yes, sir. 13 agreement, I will remand you to the c1Lo;tody of the Sheriff to
14 HIE COURT: I'll let the record n:ncct the 14 be transported to the director of the Institutional Division,
15 Defendant has identified all or the pica papers •· his 15 to serve the 42-year sentence in each rcapectivc cause as
16 written rtea admonishments nod pica bargain agrocmcnt i11 all 16 required by law. Each of the throe 42-year sentences will be
17 causes ·· and affirms his signature rn O(X,'11 court. 17 ordered to run concurrently with each other, and in each
18 And with that you can have a scat back next to your 18 St'Tltencc I will give you credit for all time you spent in
19 atwmcy. 19 cus:ody since tht' date of your original 11rrcst on thcli0
20 (Defendant seated at counsel tahlc.) 20 charges through today's date, such additional time as you
21 11:E COURT: From the viewpoint or 21 remain in Tarrant Cowity custody until actually transported
27 punishment-hearing testimony and pica testimony, both si&:s 22 and, livered to the director of the 1.nscitutional Division
23 rest and close as l'\.'l!arding cvidcmx:? 23 to serve thcsi: scntcncr.s.
24 MR. MILLER: The State docs. 14 (Court al ca.9C.)
1---------------------·-4-----------------·- --
25 MR. SALINAS: Defense rests and cl=. 25 TJIE COURT: Finally, in each of the9c ca!JICS,
Page 23 Page 25
I THt COURT. All right. 1k11, Mr. Robin100 •• and I Court will order that Ire judgment and !IC!ltcncc n:nc:ct that
2 for ti.: n:cord, )'our n,iddlc name is what? 2 a deadly WCl\pon was used or exhibited during the commillion
3 nm DEFENDANT: Jay. 3 of the felony offcnsc and thal the Deicndant knew a deadly
4 TIIE �OURT: Robby Jay Robinson. 4 weapon would be used, waa a party to the offense, and knew
S And th&, clcrk swore you and placed your true name S that a deadly weapon would be lL'ICd or exhibited in the counc
6 on the face of your indictments immcdiaacly prior IO going on 6 of tlte offense, as required by Aniclc Jg 111bsec1ion (A)(2)
7 the n:cord at the time six: sworc you ond Llic written pica 7 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedlll\'i.
8 admonishments were sworn and your judiciol conf,:s1ion was 8 MR. SAUNAS: ;bat's 42.12.
9 sworn and filed in my pn:scncc and in her pn:scncc true name 9 TI IE COURT. 42. I 2, !ICCtion 31 (A)(2) of the Code of
Ill was cnlcn:d by the cicrk, but lei the court reporter's record 10 Criminal Prro:dWI!.
11 show the Defendant c:itlfflld a true name of Robby Jay Robinson 11 And you're appointed, Mr. Sal�, so all court
12 in cocb of these cause nwnbcn. 12 costs arc waived.
IJ All right. Robby Jay Robinion, in Cause No. 13 And I think lhal takes care of it. Anythifli clllC
14 0703200A. based on your pico of guilty to the lesser included 14 from either side?
15 offcruc of mwdn', I accept your pico a,,d find you gui!ty of 15 MR. SALINAS: No, sir.
16 murder as the lcssa- offauc of the original c hargc in that 16 MR. MILLER: No, sir.
17 indictment. 17 TIU: COURT: All right. Thank you, gentlemen, for
18 In Cau'IC 0703205A, in that cause, based on your 18 staying so late.
19 pica nf guilty to the l:sscr included offense of murder, I'll 19 (Proceedings c-mcludcd at 6:05 p.m.)
20 accept your pica and find you guilty of munlcr in lhat cau'IC 20
21 as well. 21
22 And in 0703209A. in tliat indictment which 22 ·.J
23 originally cbaraal you with murder, I accept your pica aud 23
24 find you guilty of murdr:r 1.1 cbarp in that indictmcnt. 24
25 In all lbra: of tbcsc CIUIC oumbcn placed oo the 25
DBBRA MAIN, CSR P3gc 22 - Page 25
(817) 814-2996
STATE VS. ROBBY JAY �INSON Multi-Page ™ VOLUME I OP t
IIEARJNG ON GUILTY PLL,S NOVEMBER 19, 1998
I,
2
A. Yes, sir, I understand.
Q. With regard to your statcm�nt that you guve the
Page 18
I
2
A. That's com,ct.
Q. Do you undcrsta�d tbarl
Page 20
3 police -- and I don't have it here with me -- but that was� A. Yes, sir.
4 tapc-n:.-con]c(l confession, was it n,lt'I 4 Q. In other Wllrds, I cannot tell whclhcr you' JI mokc
5 A. Y�-s, sir. 5 parole: neither can the Judi!c.
6 Q. And I don't know if you actually hcl!rd the tape, 6 A. Right
7 but have you at leas: seen a transcript of that oral 7 Q. Neither con the Stak•. Do you undcrstnnd?
8 stateuX,-nt to the dctccuvcs? 8 A. Yes, sir.
!i A. Yes, sir. 9 Q. One thing you did request of me and you wonled me
JO Q. Okay, and is that statefll(.-nt to L'1e best of your IO to put it on the record nnd )'OU want assurances from the
11 'mowlcdge true ard cc,rrcct and was given freely und 11 S1a1c. that you will not be sent IO r. pcnilClltiary wbcrc
12 voluntarily to th.: dctcctivcs back in I '}967 12 Julian Burt is localed, ond I told you thal they have given
13 A. Yes, it was frocly given. It has some blind spots 13 me verbal assurances thal will not happen, com:ct?
14 in it, but ns best as I can recall. 14 A. Yes.
IS Q. Sure. It was a lengthy -- I think the transcrilx.'<1 I5 Q 1bat was one of your concc:n•?
16 statement wa.�. I think, 24 pages or something like that, but 16 A. Yes, sir.
17 the ovcr,111 content and the narrative is correct; is that 17 Q. Okay.
18 right'/ 18 nm COURT: Counsel, I'll order lbc ''SI officer 10
19 A. Ye.�, sir. 19 place on lhc PSI tbal's fil.Jd Also, thal. the Court din:cll,
,o Q. ls there anything you want to ask me about anything 20 notifics the director of the lnslihltional Division thal Ibis
21 that we have gone over with before I let Mr Salinas ask you 21 inmate shall not be housed •• I can'I lolally order ii. but I
22 some questions? 22 can funlx:r no1ify and rcinfon:c the Slate's no1icc. I'll
23 A. No, sir. 23 have thut Jone as well.
24 Q. 11iank you. 24 THE DEFENDANT: That di.un't include putting me in
25 MR. MILLER: I'll pass the witness. 25 closed custody or anythill8?
Page 19 Page 21
THE COURT: Mr. Salinas. I TIIE COURT: -bat will juAt say you will be kept
2 EXAMINATION 2 separated from thc prisoner Julian Burt. I'll put that on
3 l3Y MR. SAUNAS: 3 the PSI us an addendum lo reinforce the Slate's honori111 the
4 Q. Robby, you understand that your case is sci for 4 client's request, und whether ther put you in cl� custody,
S jury trial November 30th. Was. Your cuscs wen: set for jury 5 uncustody, trusty, that's up to them, that's their Nin. I
6 trial Novcmbl.-r 30th? 6 have no control over it, yow- lawyer or the DA, no more than
7 "· Yes. 7 parole. Du you understand tha:7
8 Q. And I visited with you this past week, gave you 8 THE DEFENDANT: Yes.
9 copies of the pn:1rial motions. we discussed the possibility 9 THE COURT: Go ahead.
10 of the plea bargain and made IIITill1gcmcnts fu you to speak 10 DY MR. SALINAS:
11 with your pan.'111.: today, correct? 11 Q. And the other thing you wanted from me was you
12 A. Correct. 12 wanted a copy of the stalcmcnl of facta form that the
13 Q. You understand that your plea was fredy and 13 District AtWmey's Office sends with your pen packet, and I
14 voluntarily entered in consultation with your p..n,.i,ts am! 14 told you I don't know when that would be ready, but 1-.-c
15 myself, but the decision w-- yours alone'/ 15 you I would get a copy and give it lo yo,A u1 the futun:.
16 A. Yes, mine alone. 16 A. Yes. I would like lo have one, 11:ea8C.
17 Q. Okay. Also indicated to you or told you in the 17 Q. Which is paragraph twelve?
18 past that bai:k in I 9QO, an asgravated offense or deadly I8 A. Yes, sir.
19 weapon lin<iing means that you've got to do at lcai,1 a 19 Q. Okay. Do you have any qucstiona to ask of me or
20 calendar one fourth. I told you that, correct? 20 the Judge or -- on anything before, you know, you finish yru
21 A. Yes, 1.ir. 21 leslimony7
22 Q, Aud I also •old you and I believe your father al110 22 A. No, sir.
23 told you there's no guarantee you will make parole. You will 23 Ma. SAUNAS: Thal's all I have, Judfc.
24 be eligible, but that's up to the Board of Pardons and 24 lllE COURT: Anythi• clsc, Mr. Miller7
25 Paroles'/ 125 MR. MILLER: Nochilll!, Ylllll' Honor. Thank you.
DBBRA MAIN, CSR Page 18 - Pqe 21
(817) 184-2996
STATE VS. ROBBY JAY R.iilNSON Multi-Page™ VOLUME I OF I
HEARING ON GUILTY PL�S NOVEMBER 19, 1998
Page 14 Pagr. 16 1
I 0703205A. is it likewise your sworn testimony that you, Robby 1 bargain?
2 Robinson, in Tarrant County, Texas, on or nbout the 14th day 2 A. Ye.;, sir.
J or Moy, 1990, did then and there cow� the death of an 3 Q. And I don't anticipate th�t this will be• problem.
4 individual, lames Lacey, as u party? 4 but in tl>e c:wnt sornc1imc in 1999 or whcncvc:r that we wen: t.,
5 A. AJ o party, yes. S bring yo11 bock to Torront County and you inform us that you
6 Q. Is it also your sworn tcstimony that you did then 6 will not live- up to that aspect or the pica bargain, that you
7 ond tlicrc inlCntionully cau1e the death or an individual, Joe 7 then undcrstund 1,1at Mr. Foran ond myself ore free Ill pursue
8 Wava-s. DJ a party? 8 the original indictment wltich you were indi�tod on bl\Ck in
9 A. As a rarty. yes. 9 19967 You understand that?
10 Q. Finally, with l'C(!Drrl to indictment munlx.T 07032091\, 10 A. Yes. sir.
11 Is it likewise your sworn tcstimony that you, Robby Robinson. II Q. That's not go,ng to occur, is it?
I 2 in Torront County, Texas. on or about ti.: 14th doy or Moy. 12 A. No, sir.
13 I 990, did thcn and there in1entio.-,a1Jy or knowingly cause the 13 Q. You wldc:ntand that lhc decision lo proceed 0<1 the
14 death of an individUlll, l.'.arl Edwards, os a pnr',y? 14 original indicuncnt that was handed uown in 1996 resit solely
I5 A. Yes, slr, that is correct. IS \\ith you, so to spcalt. You understand lhtit?
16 Q. And in cucb or lhcsc cases because dcatb n:sultecl, 16 A. Yes, sir.
17 was a fircnrm in fact used'/ Not b;: you.,.sclf, but by the 17 Q. II wiU be your dc::ision os to if anything ever
18 other panics involvod? 18 happens on that case?
19 A. Yes, sir. 19 A. Yes. sir.
20 Q. And who were the other Individuals involved in the 20 Q. Okay. We have gone ova- a lot or lllllti:nal hen:
21 Olm Key killings? 21 lhis afternoon. You've iigncd a lot or papen here this
22 A. Ju�an Burt, Malcom Griffin and Tony Fennell. 22 aftanoon. Knowine Mr. Salinas us I do, I'm sure be was YCIY
23 Q. And SJ Judge Wisch comx:tly recited and I think 23 thorouah with you, but let me ult you: Is tbcrc anything you
24 you know. Malco,r, Griffin and Anthony Fennell have oli\:ady 24 wish to ask mc about anythill(! about this 1'lca bargain or
25 pied @\lilly In this very courtroom about a month ogo, do you 25 anything that you think is cxpa:led ol you in this pica
Page 15 Page 17
I understand that? I bargain?
2 A. Yes, sir. 2 A. No, sir.
J Q. So I do not anticipate that, unless they somehow 3 Q. And for 1hr record, your molh:r and father arc hen:
4 were to breach their plea bargain agreements, thul you would 4 today, this afternoon; is that correct?
S have to �tify against Malcom Griffin and Anthony Fennell, S A. Yes, sir.
6 do you understand that? 6 Q. And according to my no� they began to visit with
7 A. Yes, sir. 7 you in Judge Wisch's jury room at about 3:55 p.m. this
8 Q. Although it's possible, I asswnc. 8 aflcmoon, and you and your parents and Mr. Salinas have had
9 However, with regard to Julian Burt, you know that 9 a significant amount of time to discuss lhe9c: matters back in
10 •• well, I assume you know that Mr. llurt is currently 10 Judge Wisch's jury room, have you IIOI.?
11 confined in the Texas penitentiary on an unrelutcd murder 11 A. Ye:;, sir.
12 charge that happened after the GI� K.:y, do you know that? 12 Q And also Mr. Salinas, prior to today's procudi ..,
13 A. No, sir. 13 had filed by my COWi! at least 27 pretrial motioru, on your
14 Q. Let me infonn you !hut is where he is at M we 14 behalf in thes: cases. You're aware of that?
IS speak. IS A. Yes, sir.
16 Let me further inform you that I don't know 1f I 16 Q. One of those fll()lions, or I guess two of thole
17 could get it dauc this term, but certainly in the first of 17 motions specifically dealt with the L-ipcd confcuioo that )'OU
18 the year, capital murder indiclmenlS will be forthcoming 18 gave to �lives Boetcher and Thornton back in 1996 at the
19 against Julian Burt. I anticipate it's Mr. Foran und my's 19 Texas i;rison unit'/
20 in1ention right now that we will in fact try lum to se..k the 20 A. It was three motions.
21 death penalty. In the event we do that, you will tcslify, 21 Q. Well, three motions. Okay.
22 Mr. Grilfln will testify, and Mr. Fennell will testify. You 22 And yt;.i Ll'.'ldmtand that by plcadi1111Uilty here
23 understand that, do you not'i 2) today, that tllOlllC motions along with all the other IDOUOIII
24 A. Yes, sir. 24 arc sort of null and void and waiwd for all p�. Do
2s Q. And you undentand d,..t that is a part of this r l.:a 25 you undmtand that?
DEBRA MAIN, CSR Page 14 - Pap 17

(817) 884-2996
STATE VS. ROBBY JAY R,QBINSON Multi-Pagc n.1 VOLUME J OF J
HEAIUNG ON GUJLTY PI.1"1S
--------.----------=--=-.;,.;::==:...:.:;.:..;.,;..;.=.,
NOVEMBER i9, 1998
Page 10 Page 12
I Tl IE COURT: All right. You take full I docs not require us lo plead S\.Ch in the indictments, your
2 n:spoMibility by your plea, I tnkc it, then. for your 2 picas here arc being entered pursuant to the law of parties
3 purtlcipation in each nnd every one oft� offcnsCJ; is J as established in the State of Texas, and you have on the
4 that corrcc t? 4 three long fom1s of papers that you signed, you have where it
5 THE DPFF.NDANT: Yes, sir, S has the judicial confession, you and Mr. Solina� have
6 THE COURT: And you promise the Court through this 6 specifically written in there that you are admitting your
7 plea agrcancnt you will fully follow all terms of what's 7 guilt and participation in these offenses as a party to these
8 lilcd es the Written i'lce llargoin Agrccmcnl if I accept your 8 offenses; is that correct?
9 plc:a and follow U1is egn.:mcnt: is that correct? 9 A. That's correct.
10 THl.1 DEFENDANT: Yes sir. 10 Q. I assume you have II good understanding of what it
11 Tl II: COURT: Then I will accept your plcu of guilty 11 is when un individual is found guilty as a party to an
12 in each of lhae cases. 12 offense?
IJ Mr. Salinas, do you 1e11dcr your clic-nt to the State 13 A. Yes, sir.
14 if Oicy wish to call him for pJl'J'OSCS of saiisfying Uic 14 Q. And in each of these throe CllSCs which we're going
15 requirements of this pa? IS 10 talk abou: •• and it's n:flectcd in iiem number twelve of
16 MR. SALINAS: Yes. sir.
.
16 the written pica bargain agreement ·• you understand the
I
17 TIIECOURT: S1a1ecall lhcDcfcndant'/ 7 State is taking the position that in each of these throe
I� Mil. MILi.ER: I do. 18 cases you did not personally fire a fircann or you pc:rsonally
19 (Defendant seated in the witness chair.) 19 did not cause the death of any of these five individuals, but
20 THE COURT: All right. Mr, Robinson. with ell this 20 nonetheless you are guilty as a party. You understand that?
21 paperwork you signed with your lawyer hen: tocfoy. you advised 21 A. Yes, �ir.
22 me in writing and you IOld me: awhile ugo that you're willir,g 22 Q. All right. And for the record •• and I think Mr.
2) to admit guil� accept rcsronsibilily and waive your right to 23 Salinas has handed you the plCII barg'lin agreement·· for the
24 ranein silent, and tbot's still the case: is U-.01 com:ct. 24 =rd, I would like to state that the ill.m that is contained
25 .1ir? 25 in number twclv� was an item that Mr. Salinas, your attorney,
Page 11 Page 13
! 111(: DEFENDANT: Yes, sir. I specifically brought to me earlier this morning and inquired
2 (Defendant sworn.) 2 if ti:at could be included as a term and condition of the plea
3 TIIE COURT: Mr. Miller. 3 bargain, and I wanted you to know that. That wasn't
4 Whereupon, 4 somctning that I e.ame up with; that was somet:ting that Mr.
5 ROBBY JAY RODINSON, 5 Salinas did acting very well on your behalf on that issue.
6 the Dcfondant, called as a witness, hJving been duly sworn, 6 Do you undcntand 1hat'I
7 testified on his oa!h as follows: 7 A. Yes, sir.
8 EXAM!NA 1 ION 8 Q. Okay. All right. With regard to the allegations
9 BY MR. MILLER: 9 in indictment number 0703200A, is it your sworn testimony
10 Q. Would you please st.ate your name'' 10 here this evening that you, Robby Robinson, in Tarrant
11 A. My name is Robby Jay Robinson. lI County, Texas, on or about the 14th day of May, J 990, d.d
12 Q. Are you the sar.te Rol)by Robinson lhat is �harged in
I :2 tool and there intentionally cause the death of an
13 each of these three cases by indictment'/ 13 individual, Robert Satterwhite? Anl thoac: allqptions l1Ue
14 A. Yes, sir. 14 and correct? As a party?
15 Q. Mr. Robinson, you understand here this aftemoon 15 A. As a party, comx:t.
16 that evC!l though you were indicted on two of the •• two of 16 Q. As a party.
17 the cas,,,--s for the offenses of capital munler, that in those 17 And all of th..:se of what I 'in going to talk about
18 two cases wi;'re going to prooced on the lesser included 18 arc as a party, you undet!ltand that'!
19 off�se of murder? You understand that, do you not'/ 19 A. Okay.
20 A. Yes, sir. 20 Q. b it likewia: your swcm teslunony that IIIOlbcr
21 Q. As we go through this here this afternoon, if I ask 21 individual •· that you did then and thcr: intmtiooally came
22 you something you do not understand, please stop me IIJld let 22 the death of another individual, Timolhy Cl11er? Is thal ••
23 me know, okay'/ 23 as a party. Is that allcplioo true and correct?
24 A. All right. 24 A As a party, that' I correct.
25 Q. And we're aiso proceeding·· even though the law 25 Q, With rcprd IC the allepti.ons in cue number
.._
DEBRA MAIN, CSlt Page 10 - Page 13
(817) 884-2996
STATE VS. ROBBY JAY RJiWINSON Multi-Page ™ VOLUME I OF I
II EARING ON GUILTY PIP1S NOVEMBER 19, 1998
I
Page 6 Page 8
I O!X,"n court today. Each of these docwncnts is styled Wrillcn I cnscs'/
2 Pica Admonishments, They arc al.o filed marked at 5:20 p.m. MR. SALINAS: Yes, we do, Your Honor.
3 today's dme in the Court's file, and in each of these (CoLrt at case.)
4 documents you and your attorney have si!!llCd and indicated to 4 111[! COURT: I guess for the record, on the written
5 me that you understand in each of these cases •• including 5 pica admonishments, as originally charged, on the two capital
6 the one that's being dismissed·· that you could have a jury 6 mnrdcr charges, the range of punishment is automatic life if
7 trial: that you could have witnesses brought to court on your 7 the death pc.'lla\:y is waived; on the third, 70320CJA, in
8 behalf; that you could n�uire the State to bring witnesses 8 writing, it is in writing the range of punishment for a
9 against you to testify and confront you and you confront them 9 first-dP..gree felony. Tiiese documents arc all signed in court
10 in open court anrl have your lawyer cross·cxamirie those 10 at the <;amc time and contemporaneously. And I verbally
11 witnesses; you've indicated that you know you could try th ese 11 advt, cl, Mr. Salinas, you and your client that to the leo;ser
12 cases one ut a time, but that you want them all heard at the 12 charge of murder it's five to 99 years or life or Sl'),000.
13 same timc; and that you're rrientally competent that your plea 13 Arc you satisfied your client understands that's
14 that you inK'lld to 1-'lltcr is knowingly, frccly and volun1arily 14 the range of punishment in each of these cases?
15 entered; that you can read and write English and understood 15 MR. SALINAS: Yes, sir.
16 all this paperwork that you and your lawyer signed und filed 16 T!IE COURT: Regardless of the original charge?
17 in the Court's file, which would include tlic written pica 17 MR. SALINAS: Yes.
18 admonishments as well as the pica bargai11 awcc='llt; and that 18 TIIE COURT: Mr. Robinson, y.iu understand it's five
19 you're satisfied with your attorney's representation; you 19 to 99 years or life in each of \.hl:se charges'/
20 would like me to follow th.: pica bargain agn.:cmcnt: and you 20 TIIE DEFENDANT: Yes, sir.
21 give up all those rights I have discussed as well as all your 21 TIIE COURT: And up to $10,000 in each of these
22 other rights in exchange for this pica bargain agreement and 22 cases as a possible fine?
23 �pccifically agree to irierimin�u: yourself and give up your 23 THE DEFENDANT: Yes, sir.
24 right to remain silent; to admit guilt today, to sign a 24 Tl IE COURT: All right. Tiien I'm going to ask you
25 judicial confession and admit guilt specifically under the 25 in Cal.l!iC No. 0703205A, which you're originally charged will!
Page 7 Page: 9
I law of parties: and lhnt no one's thn:ai.-rAl you, coerced I lhc offense of capital murdtr, to the: lesser included offeok>
2 you, forced you or persuaded or rrcirnisi.,l ycu 3nythinu otl>.:r � of murder I'll ask, what is your pl.:a, sir? Guilly or not
3 than what's spc,cilicnlly con:ained in 11-.t plcn bargain 3 guilty.
4 agrcancnt which is liL(xl with tht-sc records L, this Cause. 4 THE DEFENDANT: Guilty.
5 Is C\'tt}'lhin;1 I've staioo true and com-ct ii, ei:ch 5 THE COURT: In cauM: 703200A, whc:rc you' re
6 of lilCSC cnscs? 6 originally indiclal for the offense of c.apital munlcr, to the
7 THE DEf'E:,,jDANT: Yes. sir. 7 lesser included offcn!IC of murdcr, w• 41 is yow plal to that
8 Tl 113 COURT: Counsel. are you satisr.w. )'Our client 8 cha rge. sir? Guilty or not guilty?
9 understand., all those ngnts uod freely nnd voluntarily 9 TIIE DEFENDANT: Guilty.
IO waived all those rights'/ 10 TIIE COURT: And in indictment 0703209A, when, you
11 MR. SALINAS: Yes, Your Ho1101, I am. 11 arc iodicllld for the: offense of murdcr, wbat is Y•'llr plai to
12 THE COURT: And my impressions of your cfa'llt in my 12 the allqJations in this i11dictmcm? Quilty or not auilty?
13 dealings with him in various prcttial proccc:dings, observing 13 THE DEFENDANT: Guilty.
14 him today responding to the clerk and deputies, i, that oo 14 TIIE COURT: Arc you pleadin& auilty in cacb aod all
15 appears :o be fully compc-.cnt to plead guilty and to stand 15 tlin:e of tbcsc caSQ bccawc: you an: in fact guilty as you
16 trial. IJ t.bMt your opinion as wcU7 16 understand the law aod for no Olbc:r reason?
17 MR. SALINAS: II is. 17 THE DEFENDANT: Yes. sir.
18 THE COURT: I guess for the record, in each of 18 Tl lE COURT: Has ..:,yonc thmitmcd YoU, bribed you,
l9 these cases your attorney advised me before this hearing that 19 trickal you or used any improper infl!ICIICC t:, force you to
20 you and he had received copies of your indictments long ago 20 plead guilty vgainst your will1
21 and had ample opportunity to discuss those icdictmc11ts bcfon: 21 THE DEFENDANT: No, sir.
22 ttv:!ay. I, that also com:c� sir? 22 THE COURT: Are you plt:ading gw1ty bu:at11e you an:
2; nm Ci:!FENDANT: Yes. sir. 23 gwlty and not bccawc of IOlllC delusive hope of pudoo or
2, nm COURT: Couruc:I, c you then waive a full and 24 reward or some benefit at a Ian dale; is tbat c'.lffllCt?
25 fonr.a.1 n:iaclq of each of these indictmcol> !n each of tbcsc 2� 11-IE DEFENDANT: That's com,ct.
'llUlA MAIN, CSR i'agc6- Page9
''Y)884-29%
STATE VS. ROBBY JAY R,COINSON Multi-Page ™ VOLUME I OF I
E ARI O LT
H_ _ _ N_G_ _N_G_tn_ __Y P_f �.s_____ _________ "lOVEMBEJ l 19, 1998
I _. _
r �
Page 2 Page 4
I PROCBBDINUS weapon as a party to the offense, or anotht.T person did for
�� 19.1991
2 2 whom you arc legally n:sponsiblc as a party; as well JS all
3 t,1.1,':;.i,;.,
J)lffCnl,) 3 other conditions that are filed in each cause und styled by
4 TIIE COURT: All right. Coun calls for purposes of 4 the title Written Pica Bargain Agreement. It's file markrd
5 1rial oncVor pica Couse No. 063 I 88�. 07()32001\, 07C3205A, 5 Novcmlx.T 19th, 1998, 5:20 p.m., in each of thellC caUllC
6 07032091\, all styled the S1a1e of Texas \'CfSU\ Robby 6 numbers. Additional part of the pica agro.-mcnt indicates
7 Robinson. 7 thut you not only accept responsibility for your involvement
8 Mr. Mill .1, in llus cause nwnhcr, the r>cfcndan1 8 in these ol fcr.�s, but spccilically that you will agree to
9 pleads to srnnc of thcK allc@aticms, or nre any of thc,;c 9 implicate, truthfully testify against any or ull of the
IO going lo be dismissed? 10 co-dcfC;"tdants you an: culled upon to testify in their trials,
11 MR. MILLER: The first nwnbcr lhnt yau n:ad off. 11 specili.:ally one Julia.'I Burt, Malcom Alvin Griffin II, and
12 Judge. 0631888. I will •· I'm prcparaJ IO not ncccssanly, 12 Anthony Fennell, and if any other unindictcd co-conspiraton
J 3 but I have pn;-parod a dismissal on lh.!1 cue. 13 arc ultimately charged or tncd, you will also cooperate,
t4 Tl IE COURT: That will be dismissed in a timely I� testify truthfully in th08e trials.
15 fnshion ul Wmc poinl upon the Coun's following Ile pica 15 Mr. Salinas, is that your understanding of the ))lea
t 6 �I on thc other ca>CS? 16 bargain &gro.,'mt-nl in addition to the other spcc11ic written
17 MR. MJLLBR: Tiiat's com:cl. 17 provisions contained in th.: written pica �in agrcen,cnt of
18 TIIE COURT. Is that your undcrsianding. Mr 18 which you and your client, State of Tc�as signed in coun
19 Salinas? . 9 toda:,, which arc riled in th: r�'COl'ds of i.hi� cause'?
20 MR. SALINAS· his, Your llunor 20 MR. SALINAS: Thal is correct, Judsc.
21 Tl IE COURT: All right. Mr. Robin.1on, ).U're 21 I think the Court can take judicial notice that Mr.
22 cha-gc,d originally in 7032001\ wilh the offense or capilal 22 Griffin and Mr. Fennell already "'IIW, but he's agrcc:ing to
23 murder. and 703205A wilh the offense of capilal murder. Your 23 follow the agrocmcnt if necessary.
24 auomcy itH advised me a pica b�ain has bmt n:aclxxl tha1 24 TIIE COURT: All rigl,t. And S,ate have any
25 if you wunl lo plead guilly to each of lhosc charg,:1 and 25 objection to the Cou.,; taking judicial llC'ticc thollC two named
Pagr 3 PaacS
I ucccpt responsibility for your participation in these I persons have already pied and in fact in their pleas
2 offcnSc..-s, that he has worked out an ugrocmcnt with the State 2 implicated this Dcfcn1ant in their picas?
3 when: they will proceed on the lcs.1Cr included offense of 3 MR. MILLEk: No_
4 murder in each of those cause numbers, and that's what you're 4 And for explanation, Your Honor, that was put in
5 indicted for in 703209A. 5 there in what I s<ISpeCt the unlikely event that Mali;0111
6 ls that your undcr,tanding, Mr. Salinas? 6 Griffin and Anthony fei,nell 111 some lalcr daa: refUICd to
7 MR. SALINAS: It is, Your l lon.'lr 7 Ii 1·c up 10 their terms of their n:specth-c pica baliains,
8 TIIE COURT: Mr Robinson, is that your 8 wluch would put us back to square one, so to speak, but yes,
9 understanding as well, sir? 9 I ha1e no objection to you tak11111 JuJicial notice of their
10 TIIE DEFENDANT: Yes, sir. 10 picas.
11 TIIE COURT: The ranse of punishment for murder in 11 TIIE COU!lT: 1he Court will do so.
12 all three of those c.:ascs is by a sentence of nOI less than 12 If I go along with this plea bargain agreement, you
13 live years nor more th'lll 99 years or life in the 13 will h.l1·e no right to appeal thc9c 42·)Ur sent:ellllcll, and
14 penitentiary. You could also be fined up to SI0,000 in each 14 part or the plea bargain il8fCC1tlalt is that I diamisa the
15 cu:. 15 other cbarJI,: without prtjudioc, which means if you WCR to.
16 Do ym understand the ranse of puni. :im:nt \hat 16 for example, later rcfUIC to tntify ur to tc1tify
17 applies to each individual ca!lC? 17 untruthfully in the trial of Julian Bun, then the Stale
18 THE DEFENDANT: Yes, sir. 18 would have the riaJit to refile that Cll9C and prosecute you
IS' TJIE COURT: I have been advised in wriung and 19 again for the offc1uc of capital murder.
20 verbally prior 10 this proa,etiing there is a pica bargain 20 Do you Wlderstand all that part of the plea barpin
21 agreement that if you plead guilty to murder in each ur � 21 lljlNCIJICllt, sir?
22 three e&WICS, you'll NCCivc a ,entence of 42 yeani 22 TIIE DEFENDANT: Yes, sir.
23 confinement in the lmtitutional Dtvisioo in each case, said 23 TIIE COURT: � you a citi21m of :he United Slalcs7
24 !iClltcDccs to run concwn:ntly with Ul('b other; that a dudly 24 11IE DEFENDANT: Yes, sir.
25 wi;:apc,n findinc will be fflleicd that you u.1Cd or exhibited a 25 nm COl1 RT: You tianed lbn:c lcpl documcnll
_i!,_
DRBRA MAIN, CSR PBF2 · Pl&e 5
(117) 114-2996
STATR vs. RQaJIY JAY ROBINSONMulti-Pare ™ VOLUMB I OP I
HEARING o,f"�lJJLTV PLEAS NOVBMBBJl 19, 1991
Page 2
1 I ND EX
HEARING ON PLEAS OF GUILTY
2 NOVEMBER 19, 1998
4 Page
5 Court's admonishm�nts toDefendant.................. 3-10
6 Defendant's pleas to indictments ................ ,... 10
7
Testimony of R•JBBY JAY ROBINSON
8
Examination by Mr. Mill�r ...................... 12
9
Examination by Mr. Salinas.................... 20
10
11 Punishment assessed ................................. 25
12
Sentencing............... ........ .... .............. . 25
13
14 Reporter's certificate.......... . . . .. ........ . . ..... 27
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
DBBIA MAIN, CSR

(117) 114-2996
p� /13o
STATE VS. R9"'8Y JAY RO BJN ti
O ul -Pagc™
HEARING mt....,(JJLTY PLHAS S NM VOLUME
NOVE I OP I
MBHR 19, 1991
1
RE '
REP O T R S R ECOR D
VOLUME 1 OF 1 VOL EUM
I
TRIAL COURT C U SE NOS. 6
A 0 31 88A, 0703200A, 0703205A, 0703209A
TnE STATE OF T XAE
S E 372ND
IN T H JUDIC IAL
vs. DIST R O T OF
I CT C UR
HEA I - 1
R NG ON PLEAS OF G UI T
LY l
J
Nov ember 19, 1998
----- - - - -- --- - - - -- -- -- ----- - - -- -- ---- ---- ---- - ---
Af'PEARANCE :
S
HO ORABLE GREG MILLER
N
State Bar #14073650
HON O RA BL E RO ERT FORAN
B State Bar #07220600
Assi st ant D.◄.st::-ict Attornel- · s
Tarran t C unt J i
ce Cent er
Fort Wor o y ust
th, Te xas
Ph : 817
.
884 1 9 761 9 6 FO R THE STATE
:
on e .6 5
Fax 0 .33-,
81 7. 84
HONORABL I NA
E SA.NT AC,O SAL I S
Att o rney at Law St ta e B ar #1 536 7 8 0
3311 N. Main
For tn � Worch , 625Te xas 3
Pho : 817 . 76106 FO R THE DBFENDANT
.2 37 Fax: 817.625.2380
- - ---B �--- - --- ----- - -
IT REM�ERED tha-t 01. the- - - -- - --- - ---- - - -- -- -·�------ -------
E 9t d y f Nov mb et·,
h a o
e 1 e 1 98,
th
aboveHearin
-e ntitl g odn Plea s of Gui l t y came on to be heard in th e9
nd umb � au ses ; and the fo o w
p ro c eed in s ew e ea h and ered
ll i ng
Wisch Pre�idin g r b
d :efore e Hon ro ab le Scott
g Ju g e h
,
DEBRA MAIN, CERTIFI
ED S HORTHAND RE PO R ERT
Offici al Cour t Repor ter
372nd Judicial District Co u rt
T arrant County, Tex as
csa
DBBaA MAIN
,
(1 17 ) 11 -2996
4
& AGG ROBB-OW
□- DD
OFFE SC
l.M lTAL r,URDL:R
DATE 05- 14 -
T
i 90
X N S !:: N
I A
I. .P KO��RT SATli:.RWHllE
, ,, O '-' CC. 0629508 0618413

,, SEX
RACE
:, AGE
,,6 DOB
,._-\ C.7 AGENCY
M
(DAT OQ 0 6- r WURfH �D
E
E )
r
. 063 llSS FIL ED:

96 oP
S NC llll:.t;I DElF
C• A 1�A< D OFFENSE O ?0�514)5 COURT 037:!
fll''IN[D
TE
A
R:
T !" '. !' ;s f

E I WJ)JlT
0. Po 31 F SB A
JJ
I
D Alr rHORITY O Tl IE STATE O TEXAS: _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _
_ ___ _
F
AME AN B Y F
J RO RS O TARRA T COUNTY . TEXAS. dul elected, tried , empal'cled,
F )'
D
THE GRAN U
n ch arg d to in q u i re o f o Oe n se, c ommitted in Tarrant County, in the
orn
s w a d e
S
t a o
t e f
Tcx �a
,
u o
p
n t � r
h i
o aths d
o
p
t e � cnl in and to the * * * * * * * * *
372n DISTRICT COUR of aid Count ' . a * *
rt T ) ; t
he e ina '" e Dc , in the C, )1 ,11t o

i1 r r y f
RO �� t □�JN�ON
r fte ail d frndan t
91,
n u, n Sta e a res aid n or out th e 14 rH da of MA
Tar 1 a d t , o a y Y
fo b
AN .[ Ol\i t\ L , K f, i;►/lT
1H[N ANll IHUl[ l"lli:.NlJON A LLY LAU E IH E D IH I H O F
5 A N ll>U
A f ,.REA 1l t- . �,� ,Hr.

SAHlH�' HJ1E , �y SHOO Hi C HIM wll' H DEA L Y IJl::A ON, 10-1.111. )
'1
f-'
RH �OMHill lN� � �lTt��rJ�.

SAIV E�E. LANT IJ� l fN ANV l H E I N IH I:: CUURSE O F M
D l:.N l � ROB&ER O E ROD � R r SAlllRWHllE ,
l
il lh F r S O R Y F
COMM O N
t-Rk:: �.NTl::D l N AN D o SAll) CO , l ' U ll➔l �AJI)
1,;0IINT It.IQ: ND , [l 1S I URIHl:.R
S LIKl HA
lH� 14T
r
A A�O ES io ON 0� A�U I
uE LN ANl, IN TH CO NlY O F T kRANf nN STAT �
A R n
F O I U �N OliHri C.LY WtHt.E IN ,Ht

E
INTl:: llUN l. lN O R
D
DAY O MAY, 1990, DI D lHfN ANI> IIIERF

N A
F M
D Wl! H I ttNI l� OB IN UK N
COUKSE Ot �OMHlTfIN� THE� T 0� PRO lR Y AN
P T TA AINTAI
t;UtHRUL CJF SAIV f'RQ,... [ Rll' , I t1R l .:.Tl N OR

, A D TH I:.
P
L
ACE RUliER
D Ei LNOANT l
itR"-
1-i
lTE. Pl •:tAit OF
Dl.> THE ►/ ,.,"" T!,f . K t USE O
R
s ·, ,
IMM.NF NI f"JDT ,Y INJURY OR1 DEAT
N
IJll A FIREA O�
H
lX H!i ll . A l>E� .
T t.l EFlf·O N , 0- I ,
I YI
Fil d (Cler ' • U I C OJ

e k I Y
)
t-lltD
-
naNA.WIU9. DIST. Cl.EM
TMIWfT :U.'WlY, TOAi
N D OJ. T STATE.
GAINST H PEA C I H
Y
T E A
E D GNIT E
dl-·�-

ShowTransactionImageFile PDF

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

ShowTransactionImageFile PDF

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

STATE OF TEXAS Ve.

FILED� 09/06/96 AAA�STE0: OR/27/o�

Appeals Attorney ___________________.

-,iisibfii .1M, jffiib i,fMfcf W ....�

t·t llftS .. I U !)f 1fi!�1WI n

COMPLA,INT NO. •J.,·,rnt;•�,

Filed (Clerk•• use only)

PEACE AND DIONITY OF THE STATE.

C.ASE: r.ib3t888 DOCI E·I': CID: (!Jl5937

OEFl!''J!)ANf: i:. □ E I NS□ r.J, ROBb'I t�pf;·RANT: 1),!,31888

1:0URTi D3 2 TRANSFE.: COURT:

O1SP06IT1CN OFFENSEt --- - ---------------

,_, A�l)UNT: PAID:

R(l[<BY ROB IN.'."DN TH6ffi\!.J'im 'illl 1!!�

issued under my hand and seal of office

Byc9.S - Cot,y ' De puty

THE STATE OF TEXAS

TO DAVID WILLIAMS, SHERIFF OF TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, GREETINGS:

nm STATE OF TEXAS INTIIE372ND

ORDER APPOINTING COUNSEL FOR TIIE DEFENDANT

Date of Order: OCTOBER 3, 1996

IT IS fflEREFORE ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED by the Court t!iat

a regularly licensed and practicing attorney is hereby appointed to represent the

TIIE STATE OF TEXAS IN THE J 7�UDICIAL

Bo h by 'fob, csn TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS

STATE'S ANNOUNCEMEi'([ OF REAJU'.

TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF SAID COURT:

Writ to Serve indictment

To Any Peace Officer of the State of Texas - GREETINGS:

YOU ARE HEREBY COMMANDED to immediately deliver to

the defondant, in person, in the case of the STATE OF TEXAS vs.

pending in the Criminal District Courts of Tarrant County,

the accompa'1yir>'J certified co py of Indictment in said cause.

HEREIN FAIL ,·�oT, znd mak11 due roturn hereof FORTHWITH.

WITNESS my signature and official seal on this the

OFFICER"S RETURN: (i;°" ·'' a ,c

Form O.C. 141A

SU5SCR!BED AND SWORN TO EE�ORE ME BY THE ABOVE SIGN�D

DECLARATION OF CONFLICT BETWEEN ATTORNEY AND CLIENT

TO THE HOilC�;.3LE �'ll%E OF SAl D COURT :

<l.) F�iLURE OF COUNSEL TO FILE MGTIONS REQUESTED BY CLIENT,

(5.) FAILURE OF COUNSEL TO MEET �!iH DEFENDANT ARD/OR

DANT (OU - '1•11 i�t,!l

fl -,)DR.TH 1x 7t/9/p Tl/TIO _3 :31) .

:;_::- THDM'1S VILJ:>£R :3 7 :)_

Ii .. , 1,11," .. Ill, I,., II,,., ,I II

W//atcJH, PR£/'!J&S t/Jf/Sit£R£b, JJE/Ml)/lUT --­

t(J;sp.(,t, Tl'l/li y SVIJnl.i T/"Lb, -

TflRR.fWT CDlJAITY; ID<.A�

])ECL�RllTIDN Of CIJUfillT B£TW££��;��l&t"""'

(J.) !AIL/JR£ or C,DtJA}S[,J.. 7Z> /'IL.£:, )1{); TO)/

_L NQUIR£ INTD TIIL K[JJSDIJ.S ,c'D/?.. bISSllTISF'/J�T:IDAi..,

S'95, 5.Tl'I t.2.R. 197:J

l;/)lm;·DR.::, P1?£.111SLS CDJJ.SZbER.ch, W£1J'Dr1).)T

SlJBSt.K!Blb AVJ> 81.,.JDR,'>J Tt..1 Blf'!Jl?£ 11£ BY TH€

'vv'.4.ITI/\1(:J ON 7/-IE STitlE 1tJ Milk£ A 1V/DV€.

13£ Thl[EN /1,TTORNl Y -4Al,D <!_LIEN T 11m,

--ro ti/£ I-IDNDRA5lE. S!.lbe£ SAID COURT :

TARRANT COUNTY JAIL MAI QOOt

{YZbGJ<Ep -r,1,147 T,,t-lc Arof<.£811.Ib Mo r_zc,;J IC !l&l?.BY:

lxuurr B. : �,FDJ]Yy;l/T .rs StJ/k/7-JAJf?

\,jj.{£Rff/Jt£ • 'J>l/'Dfb!WT ffl/1',)S TIII/T TIit: :r.J.lbZC r�tcN r

_ Sut&,f,zfJEI;> /IA/2) .s,...� 7b BvoRe )1!: /JP T£ Aft)Vc

W//atcJH, PR£/'!J&S t/Jf/Sit£R£b, JJE/Ml)/lUT --

BE IT REMEMBERED, that on the _ day of ______