TABLOF CONTENTS

SUMMARY
1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The project building is on a slightly sloping terrain at Marcos Highway, Baguio City.
CONTINUE.....
2. BRIEF SUMMARY PROJECT’S IEE PROCESS
3. SUMMARY OF IMPACT ASSESSMENT ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN
4. SUMMARY OF ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING
MAIN IEER
1. BASIC PROJECT INFORMATION
2. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECTS EIA PROCESS
2.1 EIA TEAM
Pinera, Sandy Jane R
Dawaton,
2.2 EIA STUDY SCHEDULE
2.3 EIA STUDY AREA
2.4 EIA METHODOLOGY
3. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
3.1 PROJECT LOCATION
3.2 PROJECT RATIONALE
3.3 PROJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN, PROCESS/TECHNOLOGY OPTION AND PROJECT
COMPONENTS
3.4 DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT PROCESS
3.4a PRE-CONSTRUCTION/ PRE-OPERATIONAL PHASE
3.4b CONSTRUCTION/ DEVELOPMENT PHASE
3.4c OPERATIONAL PHASE
3.4d PROJECT DURATION AND SCHEDULE

MITIGATING AND
PREDICTED IMPACTS SIGNIFICANT IMPACTS **
ASSESSMENT MEASURES

+/- LT/ST R/I

A. PRE-CONSTRUCTION/ PRE-OPERATIONAL PHASE

A1. Increase in dust generation due Short  Regular watering of

to clearing, civil works and earth Term unpaved roads and
moving activities exposed soil/ground
 Remove soil/mud
from the tires of
trucks and
equipment before
leaving the area
 Hauling trucks should
be covered with
canvass of any
 equivalent material
 Set-up temporary
fence around the
construction area
A2. Top soil removal and loss due Short  Stockpile the top soil
to earthwork activities, transport Term in the safe place and
access road construction use a final grading
material or final layer
 As soon as possible
rip-rap or re-vegetate
the area

A3. Erosion from exposed cuts and Negative  Conduct construction

landslide due to earthmoving and Impact activities during dry
excavation activities season
 Avoid long exposure
of opened cuts
 Installation of net
barriers
A4. Sedimentation and siltation of Indirect  Set-up temporary silt
drainage or waterways from Impact trap/ponds to
unconfined stockpiles of soil and prevent siltation
other materials  Proper stockpiling of
spoils (on flat area
and away from
drainage routes)
 Spoils from civil
works be disposed
from filling materials
A5. Pollution of nearby water due Negative  Set-up temporary
to improper disposal of Impact disposal mechanism
construction materials. within the
construction area
and properly dispose
the generate solid
wastes
 Set-up adequate
toilet facilities
 Strictly require the
contractor and
workers to observe
proper waste
disposal and proper
sanitation
A6. Loss of vegetation due to land Short  Limit land clearing as
clearing Term much as possible
 Provide temporary
 fencing to vegetation
that will be retained
 Use of markers and
fences to direct
heavy equipment
traffic in the
construction site and
avoid damage of
plants
 Re-plant/plant
indigenous trees
species and
ornamental plants
A7. Disturbance or loss of wildlife Reversible  Re-establish or
within the influence area due to impact stimulate the habitat
noise and other and construction of the affected
activities wildlife in other
suitable area
 Schedule noisy
activities during day
time
 Undertake proper
equipment
maintenance and use
of mufflers

A8. Noise generation that can Short  Schedule noisy

affect nearby residents Term activities during day
time
 Undertake proper
equipment
maintenance and use
of mufflers
A9.Generation of employment Positive  Hiring priority shall
impact be given to qualified
local residents
A10. Conflicts in the right of way Indirect  Conduct consultation
Impact and settle
agreements before
finalizing detailed
design
A11. Increase of traffic and possible Short  Strict enforcement of
congestion term traffic rules and
regulations
 Proponent should
provide traffic aid
during peak hours
A12. Increase in the incidents of Negative  Strictly require
crime and accidents Impact contractor and
workers to follow
safety rules and
regulations in the
construction and in
the locality (in
coordination with the
local authorities)

B. OPERATIONAL PHASE OF THE PROJECT

B1. Generation of domestic Long  Provision of an

effluents Term effective (at least
three chamber of
septic tank)
 Provision of
adequate
wastewater
treatment facilities
B2. Generation of solid wastes Long  Segregation of
Term recyclable materials
 Proper collection and
disposal of solid
waste
 Proper housekeeping
and waste
minimization
B3. Increase of traffic and possible Short  Strict enforcement of
congestion as well as increase risk term traffic rules and
of vehicular and vehicular related regulation
accidents  Placement of signage
and warnings
appropriate places

4. BASELINE ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS, IMPACT ASSESSMENT AND MITIGATION

4.1 THE LAND
4.1a LAND USES AND CLASSIFICATION
4.1b TERRESTRIAL BIOLOGY
4.2 THE WATER
4.2a HYDROLOGY
4.2b OCEANOGRAPHY
4.2c WATER QUALITY
4.2d FRESH WATER BIOLOGY
4.2e MARINE BIOLOGY
4.3 THE AIR
4.3a METEOROGY
 4.3b AIR QUALITY AND NOISE
4.4 THE PEOPLE

5. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN

PROJECT PHASES MITIGATING RESPOSIBLE

IMPACTS GUARANTEE
ACTIVITIES MEASURES PERSON/ UNIT
Construction Positive and
Proponent
Phase negative impacts
Direct and indirect
Proponent
impacts
Long term and
Proponent
short term
Reversible and
irreversible Proponent
impacts

6. RECOMMENDATION
The prevailing sub-surface soil conditions at the proposed building site were made on the basis
of field investigation and laboratory test of the professionals.

Borehole number 1 showed findings with a layer of reddish to grayish brown, coarse to fine silty
clay, hard soil of medium plasticity, moist soil. The soil structure is classified as “CL-ML” in USCS
chart. High values of the Standard Penetration Test (STP) are observe at six meters and onwards.
Drilling was terminated at about twelve meters from the natural grade line. At this level, it
become unpractical to continue the boring operation utilizing the wet type wash bore
equipment. Other holes were bored but to no avail, the soil was stiff and penetration is difficult.
The ground water was not observed in the drilled boreholes.

The sub-surface soil profile correlates the findings from both boreholes
The following shall be taken in consideration:
a. Structures to be erected must lay the foundation at a level of three (3) meters depth from
the natural grade line using a net allowable soil bearing capacity of one hundred twenty four
(124) kpa. Verification shall be made when excavation is in progress. The soils engineer shall
be invited to confirm depths. This capacity increases with depth however relative to the
Standard Penetration Test (SPT) blow count values.
b. Verification of the depths of the individual foundations is to be made because of the rather
limited scope of the study which was based only on the exploratory boreholes and samples
retrieve.
c. This net allowable bearing pressure should not be arbitrary increase by 33% in designing
foundations affected by earthquake loads.
d. Differential settlement shall not exceed 25 mm or else, the allowable bearing of the soil
should be decrease accordingly.
7. BIBIOGRAPHY/ REFERENCES
8. ARMEXES
8.1 SCOPING CHECKLIST
8.2 ORIGINAL SWORN ACCOUNTABILITY STATEMENT OF PROPONENT
8.3 ORIGINAL SWORN ACCOUNTABILITY OF IEE PROPONENT
8.4 BASELINE STUDY