Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Teacher(s): Kelly Houpt (LMS), Rikki Lauer (Grade 2), Nina Wolfe (Grade 2 Magnet)
Unit: Habitats
Grade Level: 2
Plan Date: Marking Period 2
Time Frame: Approximately 3 Weeks
Project Calendar
Outline of Learning Actions
T-Teacher and L-Librarian
Pre-assessments will be given at least one week prior to the beginning of the
Before unit.
Unit T: Administer Habitat Pre-Assessment (Classroom)
L: Administer Inquiry Process Pre-Assessment (Media Center)
T & L: Introduce and unpack the project. Facilitate question generation and
help students refine questions. Identify relevant questions and record in a
Google Doc to be used as a note-catcher for Day 2. (Media Center)
Day 1
Assessment: Observations from question generation will be used to plan
instruction for Step 1 during the third marking period.
T & L: Facilitate reading activity to establish background knowledge regarding
grasslands (or savanna), temperate forest, tropical rain forest, desert, polar ice,
and tide pool habitats. Students in each group will be provided 3 different texts
and will be asked to choose the best resource for their work.
L: Use the Google Docs on the iPad to model note taking using questions from
day 1.
T& L: Monitor students and support note taking. Allow students to choose to use
Day 2
paper/pencil or Google Docs
Assessment:
Source Selection: formative feedback will be provided to help students
make the appropriate choices. Observations from this activity will be
used to plan source selection activities for animal research on day 5.
Note Taking: observations from day 2 will be used to plan note taking
support for day 3 in small groups.
T: Students will finish reading and note-taking in guided groups. (Classroom)
Day 3 Assessment: Groups will synthesize habitat notes by posting 3 big ideas about
their habitat in Google Classroom. T will check for accuracy and clarify any
misunderstandings.
T: Facilitate question generation and refinement in order to begin research of
animals from the habitat. Students will be asked to independently generate
and record one question. Students will then share out questions to be recorded
by the teacher. The teacher will model the process of identifying the relevant
Day 4 questions needed and record in a Google Doc to be used as a note-catcher
for Day 5. (Classroom)
Day 7 Assessment:
Venn diagrams will be used to evaluate students’ choices. Feedback will be
provided to those groups who may have applied flawed analysis of the
information. Students will have the opportunity to use feedback to change the
combination of animals prior to construction of the model.
Days 8&9 T & L: Students create their models.
T: Students present and defend their models.
Day 10
Summative Assessment:
Students will be assessed using the Habitat Task Rubric.
Note Taking Checklist
Yes No I can read my notes.
The planning wasn’t as collaborative as I would have hoped. I was able to meet briefly with
the two classroom teachers prior to accessing the existing unit plan via Google Drive. We
discussed the direction they were hoping to go and how I might be able to support their
goals. This unit developed out of an existing unit the team has used over the last three years.
They felt that the model habitat project was a component of the unit that could be further
developed. Independently, I spent time exploring the overall unit and then specifically looked
at how the habitat project could be expanded. I’ve had brief chats with each teacher in the
hallway before or after school and have had multiple email exchanges with them to be sure
I’m going in the right direction to support their goals while still meeting my inquiry model goals.
As a group, we are happy with the unit. We know that there will need to be adjustments
made to the timeline. We also know that there are other opportunities for instruction to be
developed further. We would like to incorporate math and social studies content into the unit
but didn’t have the time to explore that at this point. I’ve also made some suggestions for
possible literacy lessons that could occur in the classroom and/or the library, which we will add
later.
The biggest stumbling blocks were related to timing. I can see how more content could be
embedded into the unit as well as opportunities to go more deeply into the reading strategies
associated with information literacy. Unfortunately, the unit is something we will use during the
second marking period and the teachers didn’t have time to look that far ahead. I think we
will be able to refine the unit later when they are closer to the end of the marking period.
Establishing the timeline for the project was also a stumbling block. While I have a hybrid
schedule, a committee schedules the integration blocks. Teachers submit requests for
integration lessons and preferred dates. Then, the committee schedules the blocks in a way
that everyone gets an opportunity for an integration lesson in each encore area throughout
the month. As a result, we aren’t sure how we will fit all of this in within our time frame. On
paper, the timeline seems to work however we will work together to adjust as needed once
the integration calendar is completed for the second marking period.
This experience was positive overall and feels like an inroad has been established. I can see
this unit evolving between now and the implementation. And, because this project is part of a
larger unit the teachers have previously used, I think there will also be opportunities to refine
this for future use.
Works Cited
Standards for the 21st-Century Learner in Action. American Association of School Librarians,
2009.