71

LAMPIRAN

Lampiran 1 Hasil Output Uji Analisis

One-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test

L_GGN L_CUCI
L_USIA L_DIDIK L_MASA L_LAMA KULIT TANGAN L_FREK L_APD

N 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

Normal Mean .500 .910 .480 .250 .750 .260 .640 .810
Parametersa,b Std. Deviation .5025 .2876 .5021 .4352 .4352 .4408 .4824 .3943
Most Extreme Absolute .340 .533 .350 .467 .467 .462 .412 .495
Differences Positive .340 .377 .350 .467 .283 .462 .268 .315
Negative -.340 -.533 -.330 -.283 -.467 -.278 -.412 -.495
Test Statistic .340 .533 .350 .467 .467 .462 .412 .495
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) .000c .000c .000c .000c .000c .000c .000c .000c

a. Test distribution is Normal.

b. Calculated from data.
c. Lilliefors Significance Correction.

FREQUENCIES VARIABLES=L_USIA PendidikanTerakhir L_MASA L_LAMA

KeahlianPekerja L_GGNKULIT Gatal Kemerahan Bengkak Mengelupas
KulitKering PenebalanKulit KulitBersisik L_CUCITANGAN L_FREK L_APD
RiwayatPengobatan
/ORDER=ANALYSIS.

Frequencies

Frequency Table
L_USIA

Valid Cumulativ
Frequency Percent Percent e Percent

Valid .0 50 50.0 50.0 50.0

1.0 50 50.0 50.0 100.0

Total 100 100.0 100.0

Universitas Muhammadiyah Jakarta

 72

Pendidikan Terakhir

Valid Cumulative
Frequency Percent Percent Percent

Valid SD 44 44.0 44.0 44.0

SMA 9 9.0 9.0 53.0

SMP 45 45.0 45.0 98.0

Tidak Sekolah 2 2.0 2.0 100.0

Total 100 100.0 100.0

L_MASA

Valid Cumulative
Frequency Percent Percent Percent

Valid .0 52 52.0 52.0 52.0

1.0 48 48.0 48.0 100.0

Total 100 100.0 100.0

L_LAMA

Valid Cumulative
Frequency Percent Percent Percent

Valid .0 75 75.0 75.0 75.0

1.0 25 25.0 25.0 100.0

Total 100 100.0 100.0

Keahlian Pekerja

Valid Cumulative
Frequency Percent Percent Percent

Valid Melester Tembok 17 17.0 17.0 17.0

Memasang Bata 3 3.0 3.0 20.0

memasang batu
18 18.0 18.0 38.0
saluran air

Memasang Keramik 1 1.0 1.0 39.0

Memasang Paving
11 11.0 11.0 50.0
Block

Membuat Pondasi 22 22.0 22.0 72.0

Mengecor Jalan
10 10.0 10.0 82.0
Perumahan

Pengaduk Semen 18 18.0 18.0 100.0

Total 100 100.0 100.0

Universitas Muhammadiyah Jakarta

 73

L_GGN KULIT

Valid Cumulative
Frequency Percent Percent Percent

Valid .0 25 25.0 25.0 25.0

1.0 75 75.0 75.0 100.0

Total 100 100.0 100.0

Gatal

Valid Cumulative
Frequency Percent Percent Percent

Valid Tidak 45 45.0 45.0 45.0

ya 1 1.0 1.0 46.0

Ya 54 54.0 54.0 100.0

Total 100 100.0 100.0

Kemerahan

Valid Cumulative
Frequency Percent Percent Percent

Valid Tidak 58 58.0 58.0 58.0

Ya 42 42.0 42.0 100.0

Total 100 100.0 100.0

Bengkak

Valid Cumulative
Frequency Percent Percent Percent

Valid Tidak 84 84.0 84.0 84.0

Ya 16 16.0 16.0 100.0

Total 100 100.0 100.0

Mengelupas

Valid Cumulative
Frequency Percent Percent Percent

Valid Tidak 80 80.0 80.0 80.0

Ya 20 20.0 20.0 100.0

Total 100 100.0 100.0

Universitas Muhammadiyah Jakarta

 74

Kulit Kering

Valid Cumulative
Frequency Percent Percent Percent

Valid Tidak 82 82.0 82.0 82.0

Ya 18 18.0 18.0 100.0

Total 100 100.0 100.0

Penebalan Kulit

Valid Cumulative
Frequency Percent Percent Percent

Valid Tidak 81 81.0 81.0 81.0

Ya 19 19.0 19.0 100.0

Total 100 100.0 100.0

Kulit Bersisik

Valid Cumulative
Frequency Percent Percent Percent

Valid Tidak 68 68.0 68.0 68.0

Ya 32 32.0 32.0 100.0

Total 100 100.0 100.0

L_CUCI TANGAN

Valid Cumulative
Frequency Percent Percent Percent

Valid .0 74 74.0 74.0 74.0

1.0 26 26.0 26.0 100.0

Total 100 100.0 100.0

L_FREK

Valid Cumulative
Frequency Percent Percent Percent

Valid .0 36 36.0 36.0 36.0

1.0 64 64.0 64.0 100.0

Total 100 100.0 100.0

Universitas Muhammadiyah Jakarta

 75

L_APD

Valid Cumulative
Frequency Percent Percent Percent

Valid .0 19 19.0 19.0 19.0

1.0 81 81.0 81.0 100.0

Total 100 100.0 100.0

Riwayat Pengobatan

Valid Cumulative
Frequency Percent Percent Percent

Valid Tidak 83 83.0 83.0 83.0

Ya 6 6.0 6.0 89.0

Ya, tidak sembuh 11 11.0 11.0 100.0

Total 100 100.0 100.0

CROSSTABS
/TABLES=L_USIA L_DIDIK L_MASA L_LAMA L_CUCITANGAN L_FREK L_APD BY
L_GGNKULIT
/FORMAT=AVALUE TABLES
/STATISTICS=CHISQ RISK
/CELLS=COUNT
/COUNT ROUND CELL.

Crosstabs
Case Processing Summary

Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent

L_USIA * L_GGN
100 100.0% 0 0.0% 100 100.0%
KULIT
L_DIDIK * L_GGN
100 100.0% 0 0.0% 100 100.0%
KULIT
L_MASA * L_GGN
100 100.0% 0 0.0% 100 100.0%
KULIT
L_LAMA * L_GGN
100 100.0% 0 0.0% 100 100.0%
KULIT
L_CUCI TANGAN *
100 100.0% 0 0.0% 100 100.0%
L_GGN KULIT
L_FREK * L_GGN
100 100.0% 0 0.0% 100 100.0%
KULIT
L_APD * L_GGN
100 100.0% 0 0.0% 100 100.0%
KULIT

Universitas Muhammadiyah Jakarta

 76

L_USIA * L_GGN KULIT

Crosstab
Count

L_GGN KULIT

.0 1.0 Total

L_USIA .0 13 37 50

1.0 12 38 50
Total 25 75 100

Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. Exact Sig. Exact Sig.

Value df (2-sided) (2-sided) (1-sided)
a
Pearson Chi-Square .053 1 .817
Continuity
.000 1 1.000
Correctionb
Likelihood Ratio .053 1 .817
Fisher's Exact Test 1.000 .500
Linear-by-Linear
.053 1 .818
Association
N of Valid Cases 100

a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is
12.50.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate

95% Confidence Interval

Value Lower Upper

Odds Ratio for

1.113 .450 2.753
L_USIA (.0 / 1.0)
For cohort L_GGN
1.083 .549 2.138
KULIT = .0
For cohort L_GGN
.974 .776 1.221
KULIT = 1.0
N of Valid Cases 100

Universitas Muhammadiyah Jakarta

 77

L_DIDIK * L_GGN KULIT

Crosstab
Count

L_GGN KULIT

.0 1.0 Total

L_DIDIK .0 0 9 9

1.0 25 66 91
Total 25 75 100

Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. Exact Sig. Exact Sig.

Value df (2-sided) (2-sided) (1-sided)
a
Pearson Chi-Square 3.297 1 .069
Continuity
1.994 1 .158
Correctionb
Likelihood Ratio 5.469 1 .019
Fisher's Exact Test .107 .066
Linear-by-Linear
3.264 1 .071
Association
N of Valid Cases 100

a. 1 cells (25.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is
2.25.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate

95% Confidence Interval

Value Lower Upper

For cohort L_GGN

1.379 1.215 1.565
KULIT = 1.0
N of Valid Cases 100

L_MASA * L_GGN KULIT

Crosstab
Count

L_GGN KULIT

.0 1.0 Total

L_MASA .0 16 36 52

1.0 9 39 48
Total 25 75 100

Universitas Muhammadiyah Jakarta

 78

Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. Exact Sig. Exact Sig.

Value df (2-sided) (2-sided) (1-sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 1.923a 1 .166

Continuity
1.335 1 .248
Correctionb
Likelihood Ratio 1.946 1 .163
Fisher's Exact Test .248 .124
Linear-by-Linear
1.904 1 .168
Association
N of Valid Cases 100

a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is
12.00.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate

95% Confidence Interval

Value Lower Upper

Odds Ratio for

1.926 .757 4.900
L_MASA (.0 / 1.0)
For cohort L_GGN
1.641 .802 3.359
KULIT = .0
For cohort L_GGN
.852 .679 1.069
KULIT = 1.0
N of Valid Cases 100

L_LAMA * L_GGN KULIT

Crosstab
Count

L_GGN KULIT

.0 1.0 Total

L_LAMA .0 12 63 75

1.0 13 12 25
Total 25 75 100

Universitas Muhammadiyah Jakarta

 79

Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. Exact Sig. Exact Sig.

Value df (2-sided) (2-sided) (1-sided)
a
Pearson Chi-Square 12.960 1 .000
Continuity
11.111 1 .001
Correctionb
Likelihood Ratio 11.899 1 .001
Fisher's Exact Test .001 .001
Linear-by-Linear
12.830 1 .000
Association
N of Valid Cases 100

a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is
6.25.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate

95% Confidence Interval

Value Lower Upper

Odds Ratio for

.176 .065 .477
L_LAMA (.0 / 1.0)
For cohort L_GGN
.308 .162 .584
KULIT = .0
For cohort L_GGN
1.750 1.150 2.663
KULIT = 1.0
N of Valid Cases 100

L_CUCI TANGAN * L_GGN KULIT

Crosstab
Count

L_GGN KULIT

.0 1.0 Total

L_CUCI TANGAN .0 19 55 74

1.0 6 20 26
Total 25 75 100

Universitas Muhammadiyah Jakarta

 80

Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. Exact Sig. Exact Sig.

Value df (2-sided) (2-sided) (1-sided)

Pearson Chi-Square .069a 1 .792

Continuity
.000 1 1.000
Correctionb
Likelihood Ratio .070 1 .791
Fisher's Exact Test 1.000 .509
Linear-by-Linear
.069 1 .793
Association
N of Valid Cases 100

a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is
6.50.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate

95% Confidence Interval

Value Lower Upper

Odds Ratio for

L_CUCI TANGAN (.0 1.152 .403 3.294
/ 1.0)
For cohort L_GGN
1.113 .499 2.480
KULIT = .0
For cohort L_GGN
.966 .753 1.240
KULIT = 1.0
N of Valid Cases 100

L_FREK * L_GGN KULIT

Crosstab
Count

L_GGN KULIT

.0 1.0 Total

L_FREK .0 7 29 36

1.0 18 46 64
Total 25 75 100

Universitas Muhammadiyah Jakarta

 81

Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. Exact Sig. Exact Sig.

Value df (2-sided) (2-sided) (1-sided)

Pearson Chi-Square .926a 1 .336

Continuity
.521 1 .470
Correctionb
Likelihood Ratio .951 1 .329
Fisher's Exact Test .471 .237
Linear-by-Linear
.917 1 .338
Association
N of Valid Cases 100

a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is
9.00.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate

95% Confidence Interval

Value Lower Upper

Odds Ratio for

.617 .229 1.658
L_FREK (.0 / 1.0)
For cohort L_GGN
.691 .320 1.496
KULIT = .0
For cohort L_GGN
1.121 .898 1.399
KULIT = 1.0
N of Valid Cases 100

L_APD * L_GGN KULIT

Crosstab
Count

L_GGN KULIT

.0 1.0 Total

L_APD .0 2 17 19

1.0 23 58 81
Total 25 75 100

Universitas Muhammadiyah Jakarta

 82

Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. Exact Sig. Exact Sig.

Value df (2-sided) (2-sided) (1-sided)
a
Pearson Chi-Square 2.621 1 .105
Continuity
1.754 1 .185
Correctionb
Likelihood Ratio 3.024 1 .082
Fisher's Exact Test .144 .087
Linear-by-Linear
2.595 1 .107
Association
N of Valid Cases 100

a. 1 cells (25.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is
4.75.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate

95% Confidence Interval

Value Lower Upper

Odds Ratio for

.297 .063 1.388
L_APD (.0 / 1.0)
For cohort L_GGN
.371 .096 1.438
KULIT = .0
For cohort L_GGN
1.250 1.017 1.536
KULIT = 1.0
N of Valid Cases 100

End of job: 25 command lines 1 errors 0 warnings 0 CPU seconds

End of job: 29 command lines 1 errors 0 warnings 0 CPU seconds

Universitas Muhammadiyah Jakarta

 83

CROSSTABS
/TABLES=L_USIA L_DIDIK L_MASA L_LAMA BY L_CUCITANGAN
/FORMAT=AVALUE TABLES
/STATISTICS=CHISQ RISK
/CELLS=COUNT
/COUNT ROUND CELL.

Crosstabs
Case Processing Summary

Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent

L_USIA * L_CUCI
100 100.0% 0 0.0% 100 100.0%
TANGAN
L_DIDIK * L_CUCI
100 100.0% 0 0.0% 100 100.0%
TANGAN
L_MASA * L_CUCI
100 100.0% 0 0.0% 100 100.0%
TANGAN
L_LAMA * L_CUCI
100 100.0% 0 0.0% 100 100.0%
TANGAN

L_USIA * L_CUCI TANGAN

Crosstab
Count

L_CUCI TANGAN

.0 1.0 Total

L_USIA .0 43 7 50

1.0 31 19 50
Total 74 26 100

Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. Exact Sig. Exact Sig.

Value df (2-sided) (2-sided) (1-sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 7.484a 1 .006

Continuity
6.289 1 .012
Correctionb
Likelihood Ratio 7.709 1 .005
Fisher's Exact Test .011 .006
Linear-by-Linear
7.410 1 .006
Association
N of Valid Cases 100

a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 13.00.

b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Universitas Muhammadiyah Jakarta

 84

Risk Estimate

95% Confidence Interval

Value Lower Upper

Odds Ratio for

3.765 1.410 10.051
L_USIA (.0 / 1.0)
For cohort L_CUCI
1.387 1.087 1.771
TANGAN = .0
For cohort L_CUCI
.368 .170 .798
TANGAN = 1.0
N of Valid Cases 100

L_DIDIK * L_CUCI TANGAN

Crosstab
Count

L_CUCI TANGAN

.0 1.0 Total

L_DIDIK .0 9 0 9

1.0 65 26 91
Total 74 26 100

Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. Exact Sig. Exact Sig.

Value df (2-sided) (2-sided) (1-sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 3.475a 1 .062

Continuity
2.149 1 .143
Correctionb
Likelihood Ratio 5.726 1 .017
Fisher's Exact Test .107 .058
Linear-by-Linear
3.440 1 .064
Association
N of Valid Cases 100

a. 1 cells (25.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is
2.34.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Universitas Muhammadiyah Jakarta

 85

Risk Estimate

95% Confidence Interval

Value Lower Upper

For cohort L_CUCI

1.400 1.229 1.594
TANGAN = .0
N of Valid Cases 100

L_MASA * L_CUCI TANGAN

Crosstab
Count

L_CUCI TANGAN

.0 1.0 Total

L_MASA .0 45 7 52

1.0 29 19 48
Total 74 26 100

Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. Exact Sig. Exact Sig.

Value df (2-sided) (2-sided) (1-sided)
a
Pearson Chi-Square 8.852 1 .003
Continuity
7.546 1 .006
Correctionb
Likelihood Ratio 9.081 1 .003
Fisher's Exact Test .003 .003
Linear-by-Linear
8.764 1 .003
Association
N of Valid Cases 100

a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is
12.48.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate

95% Confidence Interval

Value Lower Upper

Odds Ratio for

4.212 1.574 11.270
L_MASA (.0 / 1.0)
For cohort L_CUCI
1.432 1.112 1.844
TANGAN = .0
For cohort L_CUCI
.340 .157 .736
TANGAN = 1.0
N of Valid Cases 100

Universitas Muhammadiyah Jakarta

 86

L_LAMA * L_CUCI TANGAN

Crosstab
Count

L_CUCI TANGAN

.0 1.0 Total

L_LAMA .0 52 23 75

1.0 22 3 25
Total 74 26 100

Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. Exact Sig. Exact Sig.

Value df (2-sided) (2-sided) (1-sided)
a
Pearson Chi-Square 3.396 1 .065
Continuity
2.495 1 .114
Correctionb
Likelihood Ratio 3.804 1 .051
Fisher's Exact Test .072 .052
Linear-by-Linear
3.362 1 .067
Association
N of Valid Cases 100

a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is
6.50.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate

95% Confidence Interval

Value Lower Upper

Odds Ratio for

.308 .084 1.134
L_LAMA (.0 / 1.0)
For cohort L_CUCI
.788 .639 .971
TANGAN = .0
For cohort L_CUCI
2.556 .838 7.791
TANGAN = 1.0
N of Valid Cases 100

End of job: 25 command lines 1 errors 0 warnings 0 CPU seconds

End of job: 29 command lines 1 errors 0 warnings 0 CPU seconds

Universitas Muhammadiyah Jakarta

 87

Crosstabs

Case Processing Summary

Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
L_AKHLI *
100 100.0% 0 0.0% 100 100.0%
L_GGN KULIT

L_AKHLI * L_GGN KULIT

Crosstabulation
Count

L_GGN KULIT

1.0 2.0 Total

L_AKHLI 1.0 4 13 17

2.0 0 3 3

3.0 1 17 18

4.0 0 1 1

5.0 2 9 11

6.0 7 15 22

7.0 0 10 10

8.0 11 7 18
Total 25 75 100

Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig.
Value df (2-sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 21.653a 7 .003

Likelihood Ratio 24.183 7 .001
Linear-by-Linear
6.255 1 .012
Association
N of Valid Cases 100

a. 9 cells (56.3%) have expected count less than 5. The

minimum expected count is .25.

End of job: 25 command lines 1 errors 0 warnings 0 CPU seconds

End of job: 29 command lines 1 errors 0 warnings 0 CPU seconds

Lampiran 2 Kuisioner penelitian

Universitas Muhammadiyah Jakarta

 88

KUISIONER PENELITIAN
Assalamu’alaikum wr. wb.
Bersama ini, saya Mahasiswa Program Studi Pendidikan Dokter Fakultas Kedokteran dan
Kesehatan, Universitas Muhammadiyah Jakarta, ingin memberitahukan kepada bapak-bapak
bahwa saya sedang melakukan penelitian dengan judul “Faktor-Faktor yang
Mempengaruhi Kejadian Dermatitis Kontak Iritan Akibat Semen dan Perilaku Cuci
Tangan pada Pekerja Konstruksi di Pembangunan Perumahan Park Place Kecamatan
Setu Kabupaten Bekasi”
Data atau informasi yang saya dapatkan melalui kuisioner ini akan saya jaga kerahasiaannya,
sehingga tidak memungkinkan adanya intervensi dari pihak lain. Bila bapak masih
tidak/kurang mengerti dengan penjelasan saya di atas, maka bapak dapat
mempertanyakannya langsung kepada saya.
Demikian penjelasan dari saya. Atas partisipasi dan kesedian waktu dari bapak, saya ucapkan
terima kasih.
Wassalamu’alaikum wr. wb.

Peneliti

(Aulia Ariesta Kusuma Putri)

Identitas Responden

Universitas Muhammadiyah Jakarta

 89

1. Nama : …………………………………………………………
2. Umur : …………………………………………………………
3. Alamat : …………………………………………………………
4. Pekerjaan yang dilakukan : …………………………………………………………
5. Pendidikan terakhir : …………………………………………………………

No Pertanyaan Jawaban
.
Keahlian pekerja
1. Jenis pekerjaan apa yang bapak kerjakan dalam
proyek ini?

Lama kontak
2. Berapa lama bapak bersentuhan dengan semen atau
adukan beton dalam sehari? ……. jam/hari

Masa Kerja
3. Sudah berapa lama bapak bekerja sebagai pekerja
konstruksi? ……… tahun

Riwayat Penyakit Sekarang

7. Saat sedang bekerja, apakah bapak pernah
mengalami gangguan pada kulit? a. Ya
b. Tidak

8. Gangguan kulit apa yang bapak alami?

a. Gatal
b. Kemerahan
c. Bengkak
d. Seperti terbakar
e. Mengelupas
f. Kulit kering

Universitas Muhammadiyah Jakarta

 90

g. Penebalan kulit
h. Kulit bersisik
i. Lainnya …………..

Boleh isi lebih dari satu

9. Apakah bapak pernah berobat untuk mengobati
kelainan kulit yang bapak alami? a. Ya, sampai sembuh
b. Ya, tidak sembuh
c. Tidak melakukan
pengobatan

Frekuensi Mencuci Tangan

10. Ketika sedang bekerja dan tangan bapak kotor oleh
semen, apa yang bapak lakukan? a. Langsung
mencucinya dengan
air
b. Mengelap dengan
menggunakan lap
kering
c. Membiarkan

11. Secara rata-rata berapa kali dalam sehari bapak

mencuci tangan? ……. x/hari

Penggunaan APD
12. Ketika bekerja, apakah bapak selalu menggunakan
alat pelindung diri berupa sarung tangan? a. Ya, selalu
b. Kadang-kadang
c. Tidak pernah
Lampiran 3 Riwayat Hidup
Riwayat Hidup

Nama Lengkap : Aulia Ariesta Kusuma Putri

Tempat, Tanggal Lahir : Bekasi, 9 April 1996
Jenis Kelamin : Perempuan

Universitas Muhammadiyah Jakarta

 91

Agama : Islam
Status : Belum Menikah
Kewarganegaraan : Indonesia
Alamat : Kompas Indah Jl. Kedondong C9/14 Rt. 06 Rw. 08 Mekarsari
Tambun Selatan Bekasi 17510
Email : auliaariesta@gmail.com
Telp : +6285710617964

Riwayat Pendidikan
2000 – 2001 : TK Al Muhajirin
2001 – 2007 : SD Negeri Mekarsari 04
2007 – 2010 : SMP Negeri 1 Tambun Selatan
2010 – 2013 : SMA Negeri 2 Tambun Selatan
2013 – sekarang : S1 Program Studi Pendidikan Dokter Fakultas Kedokteran
dan Kesehatan Universitas Muhammadiyah Jakarta

Universitas Muhammadiyah Jakarta