You are on page 1of 4

International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 53 (2010) 2935–2938

Contents lists available at ScienceDirect

International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer


journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ijhmt

Technical Note

Natural convection around a radial heat sink


Seung-Hwan Yu, Kwan-Soo Lee *, Se-Jin Yook
School of Mechanical Engineering, Hanyang University, 17 Haengdang-dong, Seongdong-gu, Seoul 133-791, Republic of Korea

a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t

Article history: This paper presents the details of an experimental and numerical investigation of natural convection in a
Received 15 October 2009 radial heat sink, composed of a horizontal circular base and rectangular fins. The general flow pattern is
Received in revised form 11 February 2010 that of a chimney; i.e., cooler air entering from outside is heated as it passes between the fins, and then
Accepted 11 February 2010
rises from the inner region of the heat sink. Parametric studies are performed to compare the effects of
Available online 19 March 2010
three geometric parameters (fin length, fin height, and number of fins) and a single operating parameter
(heat flux) on the thermal resistance and the average heat transfer coefficient for the heat sink array. In
Keywords:
addition, a correlation is proposed to predict the average Nusselt number for a radial heat sink.
Natural convection
Heat sink
Ó 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Circular base
Correlation

1. Introduction with rectangular bases, which might be inefficient for cooling cir-
cular LED lights.
Light-emitting diode (LED) lights have recently attracted the In this study, natural convection from a heat sink with a circular
attention of the illumination industry, due to their lower power base and rectangular fins is numerically and experimentally ana-
consumption, longer life, and smaller, more durable structure com- lyzed, and the thermo-flow pattern is observed. The effects of the
pared to other light sources. However, their use presents a thermal number of fins, fin length, fin height, and heat flux on the thermal
problem, since about 70% of their total energy consumption is resistance and the average heat transfer coefficient are investi-
emitted as heat. An efficient heat sink design is essential to solve gated. A correlation is proposed to predict the average heat transfer
this problem. Natural convection heat sinks are appropriate for coefficient for this type of heat sink, as a function of heat sink
LED lights, considering their overall advantages. However, natural dimensions and heat flux.
convection heat sinks commonly have rectangular bases, whereas
LED lights are generally circular. It is therefore desirable to inves-
tigate natural convection heat transfer via a heat sink with a circu- 2. Mathematical modeling
lar base.
Numerous experimental [1–4] and numerical [5] studies of Fig. 1 shows a radial heat sink consisting of a circular base and
rectangular fin or pin fin heat sinks have been carried out. Starner rectangular fins. The fins were arranged radially at regular inter-
and McManus [1] experimentally investigated natural convection vals. The heat sink base was oriented horizontally. The heat sink
heat transfer from four heat sinks of differing dimensions, with was made of aluminum, whose properties are listed in Table 1.
the heat sinks oriented vertically, at a 45° angle, and horizontally.
Welling and Woolbridge [2] conducted an experimental study of
2.1. Governing equations
vertically oriented rectangular fins of constant length attached to
a vertical base. They found that there exists an optimal fin height,
For the numerical analysis, the following assumptions were
corresponding to a maximum rate of natural convection heat
imposed.
transfer, for any given fin spacing. Harahap and Mcmanus [3] per-
formed experiments to calculate the average heat transfer coeffi-
(1) The flow was steady, laminar, and three-dimensional.
cients for two different fin lengths, and established a correlation
(2) Aside from density, the properties of the fluid were indepen-
with non-dimensional parameters and relevant fin dimensions.
dent of temperature.
However, most of these studies were concerned with heat sinks
(3) Air density was calculated by treating air as an ideal gas.
(4) Radiation heat transfer was negligible.
* Corresponding author. Tel.: +82 2 2220 0426; fax: +82 2 2295 9021.
E-mail address: ksleehy@hanyang.ac.kr (K.-S. Lee). The governing equations were as follows.

0017-9310/$ - see front matter Ó 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2010.02.032
2936 S.-H. Yu et al. / International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 53 (2010) 2935–2938

Nomenclature

b spacing between fins, mm t fin thickness, mm


cp coefficient of heat capacity, J/(kg °C) u x-component of velocity, m/s
F view factor v y-component of velocity, m/s
h heat transfer coefficient, W/m2 K w z-component of velocity, m/s
H fin height, mm
k thermal conductivity, W/m °C Greek symbols
L fin length, mm e emissivity
Mw gas molecular weight, kg/kmol l dynamic viscosity, N/m2 s
Nu Nusselt number, hL/k h angle, °
n number of fins in the normal direction q density, kg/m3
Pr Prandtl number r Stefan–Boltzmann constant, 5.67  108 W/m2 K4
p pressure, N/m2
q_ heat flux, W/m2 Subscripts
Rc universal gas constant avg average
RTH thermal resistance, °C/W f fluid (air)
_ 3
q2 gbcp pðr2o r2i ÞqL
Ra* modified Rayleigh number, i inner
lLk2
r radius, mm o outer
T temperature, K or °C s solid (heat sink)

2.1.1. Air side 2.1.2. Solid side


Continuity equation: Energy equation:
@ðquÞ @ðqv Þ @ðqwÞ @2T @2T @2T
þ þ ¼0 ð1Þ þ þ ¼0 ð6Þ
@x @y @z @x2 @y2 @z2
Momentum equations: The density of air was calculated from the ideal gas law,
!
@ðqu2 Þ @ðquv Þ @ðquwÞ @P @2u @2u @2u Patm
þ þ ¼ þl þ þ ð2Þ q¼ ð7Þ
@x @y @z @x @x2 @y2 @z2 ðRc =M w ÞT
!
@ðqv uÞ @ðqv 2 Þ @ðqv wÞ @P @2v @2v @2v where Mw of air is 28.966 kg/kmol.
þ þ ¼ þl þ þ
@x @y @z @y @x2 @y2 @z2 Periodic boundary conditions were adopted in accordance with
the geometry of the heat sink (Fig. 1). Because of the number of
þ gðq  qa Þ ð3Þ
! grids and the computational time involved, only a single fin was
2 2 2
@ðqwuÞ @ðqwv Þ @ðqw Þ @P 2
@ w @ w @ w considered, as shown in Fig. 2.
þ þ ¼ þl þ 2 þ 2 ð4Þ
@x @y @z @z @x2 @y @z
2.2. Numerical procedure and validation
Energy equation:
!
@ðquTÞ @ðqv TÞ @ðqwTÞ k @ 2 T @ 2 T @ 2 T The numerical simulation was conducted using Fluent V6.3, a
þ þ ¼ þ þ ð5Þ commercially available CFD code based on the finite volume meth-
@x @y @z cp @x2 @y2 @z2
od. The grid dependence was investigated by varying the number
of grid points from 22,680 to 285,714. We selected 65,016 grid
points; additional grid points produced a change of less than
0.5% in the average heat sink temperature for the reference model
of n = 20 and ro = 75 mm.
The numerical results were validated with experimental data by
comparing the differences between the ambient and heat sink tem-
peratures. The geometric parameters of the experimental model
were n = 20, ro = 75 mm, L = 55 mm, H = 21.3 mm, and t = 2 mm.
Fig. 3 compares the temperature differences between the experi-
mental and numerical results in terms of the heat flux applied to
the heat sink base. This implies that the present numerical model
can correctly predict the natural convection flow around a radial
heat sink.

Table 1
Air and heat sink properties.

Material cp (J/ l (N/m2 s) k (W/m °C) q (kg/


kg °C) m3)
5 5
Air 1005.585 1.834  10 2.643  10 Eq. (7)
Heat sink 2800 – 193 880
(aluminum)
Fig. 1. Radial heat sink with a circular base and rectangular fins.
S.-H. Yu et al. / International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 53 (2010) 2935–2938 2937

40
Computational results
Experimental results

30

Tavg− T∞
20

10

0 200 400 600 800


2
q(W/m )
Fig. 3. Comparison of the temperature differences between the experimental and
Fig. 2. Computational domain and dimensions. numerical results.

3. Results and discussion since the heat transfer coefficient was very small. Consequently,
there exists optimum number of fins that gives the minimum ther-
Parametric studies were carried out by numerically investigat- mal resistance.
ing the effects of the number of fins, fin length, fin height, and heat Fig. 4(b) shows the effect of the fin length. As the fin length in-
flux on the thermal resistance and the heat transfer coefficient. creased, the thermal resistance and average heat transfer coeffi-
Based on these results, a correlation was proposed to predict the cient decreased. The thermal resistance leveled off and reached a
Nusselt number for a heat sink with a horizontal circular base steady value when the fin was longer than 55 mm. This was be-
and rectangular fins. cause the air temperature in the inner region was almost the same
as the heat sink temperature, and hence any additional fin length
3.1. Thermo-flow characteristics beyond 55 mm did not contribute to the heat transfer rate.
Fig. 4(c) indicates the effect of the fin height. A lower thermal
There are two flows, i.e., vertical and horizontal flows, around resistance resulted from the increased heat transfer surface area
the radial heat sink. The vertical flow is in the upward direction, created by the incremented fin height. However, the change in
since air is heated by the heat sink (which is maintained at a higher the heat transfer coefficient was relatively small, since the velocity
temperature) and becomes lighter than the surrounding air. The of the air entering from outside increased very little with increas-
horizontal flow is created by air entering from outside the heat ing fin height.
sink to make up for the vertical flow in the inner region. Therefore, Fig. 4(d) illustrates the effect of the heat flux applied to the heat
the overall flow pattern is chimney-like. The temperature of heat sink base. The decrease in thermal resistance due to increasing
sink maintains almost uniformly high because of high conductivity heat flux resulted in a greater rising air velocity, which in turn in-
of aluminum. The heat transfer rate in the outer region of the heat creased the flow rate of the cooler air entering from outside.
sink was higher than in the inner region. This was because the tem- Accordingly, the average heat transfer coefficient increased almost
perature difference between the air and the heat sink decreased as linearly, thanks to the enhanced effect of natural convection.
the cool air proceeded towards the inner region of the heat sink.

3.3. Correlation
3.2. Parametric study
A correlation for predicting the Nusselt number for a heat sink
The effects of the number of fins, fin length, fin height, and heat with a horizontal circular base and rectangular fins was derived
flux on the thermal resistance and the heat transfer coefficient as a function of the parameters investigated in the previous sec-
were investigated. The reference model is n = 20, ro = 75 mm, tion, as well as other geometric parameters, and was obtained from
L = 55 mm, H = 21.3 mm, t = 2 mm, and q_ ¼ 700 W=m2 . numerical data. This formula is based on the correlations for rect-
The effect of the number of fins on the thermal resistance and angular heat sinks obtained in previous studies [1,3], using average
heat transfer coefficient is shown in Fig. 4(a). The average heat fin spacing and the modified channel Rayleigh number,
transfer coefficient decreased as the number of fins increased, since
the flow rate of the cooler air entering the spaces between the fins  1:35  0:444  0:142  1:4
nbavg ro ro ro
decreased and the air was heated more quickly on account of the Nu ¼ 0:195ðRa Þ0:263 ð8Þ
H L bavg H
reduced space between fins. However, when the number of fins
was less than 36, the thermal resistance of the heat sink decreased _ 3
q2 gbcp pðr 2o r 2i ÞqL
with increasing n, since the effect of the increased heat transfer where Ra ¼ lLk2
; bavg = {(2pro/n  t) + (2p(ro – L)/n  t)}/2 ,
surface area was larger than the effect of the decreased heat trans- and the properties are based on the film temperature.
fer coefficient. When the number of fins was greater than 36, the The predicted correlation was consistent with the numerical da-
thermal resistance of the heat sink increased with increasing n, ta, with an error of less than 10%, when t = 2 mm, 20 6 n 6 36,
2938 S.-H. Yu et al. / International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 53 (2010) 2935–2938

3.00 7
2.75 RTH RTH
havg havg
6

h avg(W/m K)
havg (W/m K)

RTH( C/W)
RTH( C/W)

2
2
2.50 2.75

o
o

4
5

2.25
2 2.50 4
24 32 40 40 50 60
n L (mm)
(a) The effect of the number of fins (b) The effect of the fin length

3.0 6 3.5 7
RTH RTH
havg havg

2.5 3.0 6
h avg(W/m K)

h avg(W/m K)
RTH( C/W)
2

2
RTH( C/W)

5
o
o

2.0 2.5 5

1.5 4 2.0 4
20 30 40 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
H (mm) 2
q (W/m )
(c) The effect of the fin height (d) The effect of the heat flux
Fig. 4. The results of parametric study. (a) The effect of the number of fins, (b) the effect of the fin length, (c) the effect of the fin height, (d) the effect of the heat flux.

21.3 mm 6 H 6 63.9 mm, 75 mm 6 ro 6 102 mm, 40 mm 6 L 6 creased in proportion to the heat flux applied to the heat sink
80 mm, and 300 W=m2  q_  1100 W=m2 . base. A correlation was proposed to predict the average Nusselt
number for a radial heat sink.
4. Conclusions
References
Natural convection from a radial heat sink was experimentally
and numerically investigated. The general flow pattern was like [1] K.E. Starner, H.N. McManus, An experimental investigation of free convection
that of a chimney; i.e., the cooling air entering from outside was heat transfer from rectangular fin arrays, J. Heat Transfer 85 (2) (1963) 273–
278.
heated as it passed between the fins, and then rose from the inner [2] J.R. Welling, C.B. Wooldridge, Free convection heat transfer coefficients
region of heat sink. Parametric studies were performed to compare from rectangular vertical fins, Trans. ASME J. Heat Transfer 87 (3) (1965)
the effects of the number of fins, fin length, fin height, and heat flux 439–444.
[3] F. Harahap, H.N. McManus, Natural convection heat transfer from horizontal
on the thermal resistance and the heat transfer coefficient. As the
rectangular fin arrays, J. Heat Transfer 89 (1) (1967) 32–38.
number of fins, fin length, and fin height increased, the thermal [4] R.T. Huang, W.J. Sheu, C.C. Wang, Orientation effect on natural convective
resistance and heat transfer coefficient generally decreased. How- performance of square pin fin heat sinks, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 51 (9–10)
ever, there existed optimal values of the number of fins and fin (2008) 2368–2376.
[5] S. Baskaya, M. Sivrioglu, M. Ozek, Parametric study of natural convection heat
length to obtain an effective low heat sink temperature. The ther- transfer from horizontal rectangular fin arrays, Int. J. Therm. Sci. 39 (8) (2000)
mal resistance decreased and the heat transfer coefficient in- 797–805.

You might also like