Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Studies
A/Prof Colin Dunstan
colin.dunstan@sydney.edu.au
In Vivo Research
• In vivo research (literally “in life”) is research in
living animals
• in vitro research (literally “in glass” is research
done in glass (or plastic ...). Does include cell
culture
• A major difference for In Vivo Studies is the
ethical issue of conducting research in animals
capable of sensing pain, stress, fear, isolation
and environmental deprivation.
Advantages and Disadvantages
Compared to organ culture, cell culture
and test tube
Advantages Disadvantages
• Direct relevance to whole animal physiology • High variability due to low numbers, genetic
• Model complex interactions of several and environmental heterogeneity
systems ie assess pharmacokinetics of • Complexity makes interpretation difficult ie
dosed factor direct versus indirect effects
• Model disease processes • Compensatory mechanisms may modify or
• Can identify novel actions nullify effects
• Effects likely to be predictive of human • Confounding responses are frequent
physiology or pathology • Experimental animals may not reflect
human response
How are the ethical issues
addressed in science
• Monitor animals
– frequently for signs of pain, distress, or other morbidity
– Continually while anesthetized for temperature,
respiration and recovery
– For changes in appearance
– For changes in behaviour – eating, drinking, grooming
– For weight loss
– Respond to adverse indications with euthanasia, or with
analgesia, suspension of experiment etcetera as
covered by protocol.
IRMA animal ethics application
Transgenic Overexpression
Introduce multiple copies of a gene into the genome of a mouse under a
promotor to induce high levels of local protein expression.
• Constitutive promotor – protein expressed in all tissues ie actin
promotor
– Advantage: High exposure to the protein as expressed in all tissues
– Good for discovery studies where gene function unknown
– Disadvantage: Significant probability of lethal effects. Can occur
during development of the embryo. Phenotype can be complex.
• Tissue specific promotor eg apoE promotor to give liver expression
– Advantage: effects in a particular cell type or tissue can be isolated
– Disadvantage: Developmental effects can obscure normal
physiological role
• Conditional promotor – promotor regulated by nonphysiological
chemical administered by investigator eg tetracycline
– Advantage: Avoids the effects of compensatory pathways that
develop over time
– Disadvantage: Expression levels often low
Inducing transgenic overexpression of
a gene
Blastocyst
Surrogate
Heterozygote Heterozygote
Homozygote (knockout)
Vitamin D Receptor Knockout
+/+
-/-
6 months
OPG Deficiency in Mice Produces High
Bone Turnover Osteoporosis and
Changes in Cortical Architecture
Wildtype
OPG-/-
In Vivo Tools - Genetic Manipulation
• Gene Knockout
– Disrupt gene in germ line to produce no expression or a
totally inactive product
Advantages Disadvantages
• Guaranteed gene deficiency • Redundancy or compensation
• Phenotype reveals function may mean no phenotype
• Phenotype may reveal • Deletion may be lethal
unanticipated function • Phenotype could be complex
• Provides animal model for • Challenge may be needed to
challenge studies unmask phenotype
Nucleotide sequence from human or mouse genome for protein of unknown function
Discovery
•Tissue distribution of expression
•Effects of overexpression in a transgenic mouse
•Effects in vivo of recombinant protein
•Effect of gene deletion
Translation
•Action of drug (recombinant protein, antibody, small molecule of antisense
construct) in animal models of human disease
•Determine pharmacokinetics of handling of drug (2-3 species)
•Determine safety margin between efficacy and toxicity in animal models (usually 2
species)
Use of Challenges
Wildtype
OPG-/-
Pharmacokinetics: Animals are used to
determine how drugs are absorbed and
cleared to help determine dosing
3
10
2
10
1
10
0
10
10 -1
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 9
Study Month
Toxicology Studies
(one of the more contentious forms of
animal experimentation)
• Generally two species used: rats and one larger species (rabbit or
dog are common)
• Animals receive escalating doses of the drug
• Dosing continues until the maximum planned dose reached or
toxicity is detected (illness or death in a proportion of animals)
• After euthanasia, animals are thoroughly investigated to identify
tissue pathologies
• Results direct dosing in humans, and monitoring for adverse
effects during clinical trials.
Conclusions
• In vivo (in animals) methods can be very powerful experimental
tools
• Research with animals must be ethically justified
• Can study be done another way?
• Is the study likely to produce novel and scientifically
interesting results, or have some other significant value?
• Does the importance of the results justify the level of
invasiveness of procedures or potential pain and suffering in
the animal?
• Do investigators have the skill, knowledge and facilities to
conduct the study ethically
• Research must be approved by an animal welfare committee
• Minimal numbers must be used
• Pain and suffering must be anticipated and minimised
• Animals must be monitored closely