Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Studies of Studies
Users of Usage
- socio-economic
factors - transaction
-ethnicity, national data, both
origin, language, automated and
etc. traditional
- non-users
Basic Problems
• Is there a theoretical basis to the analysis?
• Are the results reproducible?
• What can be changed based on the findings?
• How do we know changes will help?
Possible solution:
- Develop theoretical approach early
Typical Steps in Social Science Research
Socio-economic factors
Institutional factors
Funding Research output
Revised Bibliometric Model of Scholarly Productivity
Socio-economic factors
Institutional factors
Computer use /
Internet use
Revised Bibliometric Model of Scholarly Productivity
Socio-economic factors
Institutional factors
Computer skills/literacy
Computer use /
Internet use
Major issues:
- What sample/universe to use?
- How to measure inputs?
- How to measure outputs?
- Functional form? (linear?, additive?)
List of Selected Processes
Mail Pnews archie cnrmenu elm eudora finger ftp gladis gopher
imap irc kermit lynx mail mailtool mailx melvyl netscape newmail
nn nslookup pine popper rlogin talk telnet tin trn trn-artc
weather webster xrn rsh rcp whois
Percentage of Faculty Using Each
Service
100 94%
90
80
70 62%
% of Faculty
60
50 44%
37% 35%
40
25% 24%
30
16% 13%
20
9%
10 3%
0
WAIS
Sequence
FTP
WWW
Gopher
Telnet
Newsgroup
Supercomp
E-mail
Listserver
E-journal
ana.
uter
Services
% of Faculty Using Internet Services
from Questionnaire and Log
100
90
% of faculty using the
80
70
60 Que %
service
50
40 Log %
30
20
10
0 Gopher
FTP
WWW
Telnet
Newsgroups
E-mail
Services
Our main hypothesis in this research is that scholars'
Internet-use data add explanatory power to models of
scholarly productivity. The formal null and alternate
hypotheses are:
H0: Internet use data does not add explanatory
power to the Traditional Publication Model.
H1: Internet use data adds explanatory power to
the Traditional Publication Model.
We used multiple regressions to estimate the four models
listed in Figure 5. Since we are interested in whether a set
of one or more Internet-use variables “improves” the
explanatory power of the traditional model, the appropriate
measure is the F-statistic from a comparison of the
restricted (traditional) model with the unrestricted (new)
model.
Dependent Variable: PUBAV
Analysis of Variance
Sum of Mean
Source DF Squares Square F Value Prob>F
Model 6 56.72845 9.45474 1.230 0.3148
Error 35 269.07034 7.68772
Total 41 325.79879
Parameter Estimates
KEY:
N Number of cases