You are on page 1of 29

Validation and Optimization of Front End Cooling

Module for Commercial Vehicle using CFD Simulation


Ashok Patidar, Umashanker Gupta, Nitin Marathe
VE Commercial Vehicles Ltd. INDIA
(A VOLVO GROUP AND EICHER MOTORS JOINT VENTURE)
VE Commercial Vehicles Ltd - Overview

Trucks : 5 Tons – 40 Tons Buses : 12 seater – 65 seater


Haulage: 5 Tons – 31 Tons School Buses:

Tipper: 8 Tons – 25 Tons Staff Buses:

Articulated Tractor: 40 Tons City Buses & Special applications:

Wednesday, September 26, 2012 2012 Automotive Simulation World Congress 2


Contents

 Introduction

 Methodology

 Results

 Summery

Wednesday, September 26, 2012 2012 Automotive Simulation World Congress 3


Introduction
In CFD modeling full vehicle is modeled considering front
bumper, grille, cabin, cargo, surrounding under hood and
under body components.
The flow resistance of heat exchangers is considered
using porous modeling technique.
Heat exchanger performance data generated from 1-D
Kuli software is taken in simulation using single pass
Heat Exchanger model.
Front End Cooling analysis is done for max power and
max torque vehicle conditions.
Wednesday, September 26, 2012 2012 Automotive Simulation World Congress 4
Introduction
Preliminary CFD Front End Cooling analysis is done on
existing commercial vehicle and correlated well with
field test results.

Front grille Opening Intercooler Radiator


Developed and validated CFD Front End Cooling process
is implemented on new commercial Vehicle.
Hot and cold air recirculation zones are identified in
under hood compartment. Elimination of recirculation
showed good improvement in radiator and intercooler
cooling performance.
Wednesday, September 26, 2012 5
2012 Automotive Simulation World Congress
Methodology: CFD Simulation
CAD Model

CAD Cleanup Using HyperMesh

Mesh Model Generation Using TGrid

Setup and Solver (solve


Using Fluent
fundamental equations)

Post Processing and Result


Using CFD Post
Interpretation

No Is met
Design Change Recommendation the
targets?

Yes
Final Proto Test Verification
Wednesday, September 26, 2012 2012 Automotive Simulation World Congress 6
Methodology: Mesh Generation
Non conformal mesh technique is used for heat exchanger
modeling
Tri Shell @ Intercooler tank
headers & Hoses

Quad Shell @ Intercooler


Faces

Non conformal Mesh @ Intercooler


Wednesday, September 26, 2012 2012 Automotive Simulation World Congress 7
Methodology: Mesh Generation
Non conformal mesh technique is used for heat exchanger
modeling
Tri Shell @ radiator tank
headers & Hoses

Quad Shell @ radiator


Faces

Non conformal Mesh @ Radiator


Wednesday, September 26, 2012 2012 Automotive Simulation World Congress 8
Methodology: Mesh Generation
Non conformal mesh technique is used for heat exchanger
modeling

Radiator Tank
Radiator
Radiator Fan

Intercooler
Under-hood components
Volume Mesh @ Computational Domain
Wednesday, September 26, 2012 2012 Automotive Simulation World Congress 9
Methodology: Input Conditions
Vehicle Speed & Fan Speed:
Max Power Max Torque
Vehicle Speed (KMPH) V1 V2
Radiator Fan Speed (RPM) N1 N2

Input Parameters for thermal analysis :


Max Power Max Torque
Radiator
Coolant Flow Rate (kg/s) mc1 mc2
Coolant Inlet Temp ( C) Tcin1 Tcin2
Intercooler
Charged air Flow Rate (kg/s) ma1 ma2
Charged air inlet temp ( C) Tain1 Tain2

Heat Exchanger Model:


• Ungrouped Macro Based Model is used
• Fix inlet temperature
Note : Owing to IPR policy the numerical values cloud not disclosed
Wednesday, September 26, 2012 2012 Automotive Simulation World Congress 10
Methodology: Input Conditions

Heat exchanger performance data generated through 1-D


KULI software for computing heat rejection and outlet
temperature of coolant and charged air :
Radiator performance data : Intercooler performance data :
Coolant flow charged air flow
c1 c2 c3 c4 c5 c6 c1 c2 c3 c4 c5 c6
rate (kg/s) rate (kg/s)
Air Flow rate Air Flow rate
Heat Transfer (W) Heat Transfer (W)
(kg/s) (kg/s)
a1 h11 h21 h31 h41 h51 h61 a1 h11 h21 h31 h41 h51 h61
a2 h12 h22 h32 h42 h52 h62 a2 h12 h22 h32 h42 h52 h62
a3 h13 h23 h33 h43 h53 h63 a3 h13 h23 h33 h43 h53 h63
a4 h14 h24 h34 h44 h54 h64 a4 h14 h24 h34 h44 h54 h64
a5 h15 h25 h35 h45 h55 h65 a5 h15 h25 h35 h45 h55 h65
a6 h16 h26 h36 h46 h56 h66 a6 h16 h26 h36 h46 h56 h66

Note : Owing to IPR policy the numerical values cloud not disclosed
Wednesday, September 26, 2012 2012 Automotive Simulation World Congress 11
Results: Existing Vehicle – Max Power Condition
Intercooler Radiator
Velocity contours (m/s) Velocity contours (m/s)
Max Max

Velocity = 5.2 m/s


Min

Velocity = 7.2 m/s


Min

Temperature contours ( C) Temperature contours ( C)


Inlet Face Outlet Face Inlet Face Outlet Face
Coolant flow direction
Max
Charged Air Flow direction
Max

Min
Min

Test Charged Air ∆T =63.7 C CFD ∆T = 76.5 C Test Coolant ∆T = 4.7 C CFD ∆T = 5.5 C
Wednesday, September 26, 2012 2012 Automotive Simulation World Congress 12
Results: Existing Vehicle – Max Power Condition
Intercooler Radiator
Velocity contours (m/s) Velocity contours (m/s)
Max Max

Velocity = 5.2 m/s


Min

Velocity = 7.2 m/s


Min

Temperature contours ( C) Temperature contours ( C)


Inlet Face Outlet Face Inlet Face Outlet Face
Coolant flow direction
Max
Charged Air Flow direction
Max

Min
Min

Test Charged Air ∆T =63.7 C CFD ∆T = 76.5 C Test Coolant ∆T = 4.7 C CFD ∆T = 5.5 C
Wednesday, September 26, 2012 2012 Automotive Simulation World Congress 13
Correlation: Existing Vehicle – Max Power Condition

Predicted vehicle level performance of intercooler and


radiator at fixed inlet temp
Intercooler Radiator
Ambient Temp = 28.5 C Correlation Correlation
Test CFD Test CFD
(%) (%)
CFD Inputs
Flow Rate (kg/s) ma1 ma1 -- mc1 mc1 --
Coolant/ Inlet Temp (°C) Tain1 Tain1 -- Tcin1 Tcin1 --
Charged air
side CFD Outcomes
Outlet Temp (°C) Taout1Test Taout1CFD -- Tcout1Test Tcout1CFD --
Temp Drop (°C) 63.7 76.5 80 4.7 5.5 83
Heat Rejection (kW) 8.3 10 79.5 42.6 49.9 82.8

Wednesday, September 26, 2012 2012 Automotive Simulation World Congress 14


Results: Existing Vehicle – Max Torque Condition
Intercooler Radiator
Velocity contours (m/s) Velocity contours (m/s)
Max Max

Velocity = 2.2 m/s


Min
Velocity = 3.1 m/s
Min

Temperature contours ( C) Temperature contours ( C)


Inlet Face Outlet Face Inlet Face Outlet Face
Coolant flow direction
Max
Charged Air Flow direction
Max

Min
Min

Test Charged Air ∆T =47.3 C CFD ∆T = 52.5 C Test Coolant ∆T = 5 C CFD ∆T = 5.8 C
Wednesday, September 26, 2012 2012 Automotive Simulation World Congress 15
Results: Existing Vehicle – Max Torque Condition
Intercooler Radiator
Velocity contours (m/s) Velocity contours (m/s)
Max Max

Velocity = 2.2 m/s


Min
Velocity = 3.1 m/s
Min

Temperature contours ( C) Temperature contours ( C)


Inlet Face Outlet Face Inlet Face Outlet Face
Coolant flow direction
Max
Charged Air Flow direction
Max

Min
Min

Test Charged Air ∆T =47.3 C CFD ∆T = 52.5 C Test Coolant ∆T = 5 C CFD ∆T = 5.8 C
Wednesday, September 26, 2012 2012 Automotive Simulation World Congress 16
Correlation: Existing Vehicle – Max Torque Condition

Predicted vehicle level performance of intercooler and


radiator at fixed inlet temp
Intercooler Radiator
Ambient Temp = 29 C Correlation Correlation
Test CFD Test CFD
(%) (%)
CFD Inputs
Flow Rate (kg/s) ma2 ma2 -- mc2 mc2 --
Coolant/ Inlet Temp (°C) Tain2 Tain2 -- Tcin2 Tcin2 --
Charged air
side CFD Outcomes
Outlet Temp (°C) Taout2Test Taout2CFD -- Tcout2Test Tcout2CFD --
Temp Drop (°C) 47.3 52.5 89 5 5.8 84
Heat Rejection (kW) 3.1 3.4 90.3 20.1 23.4 83.6

Wednesday, September 26, 2012 2012 Automotive Simulation World Congress 17


New Vehicle – Geometry Details

Intercooler – Radiator
-Fan Module (IRFM)

Wednesday, September 26, 2012 2012 Automotive Simulation World Congress 18


Results: New Vehicle – Under-hood Thermal Flow Field
Hot air recirculation in front of
intercooler

Hot air recirculation in front of


intercooler

Path Lines coloured by Temperature ( C)


Wednesday, September 26, 2012 2012 Automotive Simulation World Congress 19
Results: New Vehicle – Under-hood Thermal Flow Field
Hot air recirculation in front of
intercooler

Hot air recirculation in front of


intercooler

Path Lines coloured by Temperature ( C)


Wednesday, September 26, 2012 2012 Automotive Simulation World Congress 20
Results: New Vehicle – Baseline IRFM Packaging

Intercooler – Radiator –Fan


Module

Wednesday, September 26, 2012 2012 Automotive Simulation World Congress 21


Results: New Vehicle –Improved IRFM Packaging

IRFM Sealing

Intercooler – Radiator –Fan


Module

 introduced IRFM Sealing to stop hot air recirculation in under-hood compartment as


shown in above fig.
Wednesday, September 26, 2012 2012 Automotive Simulation World Congress 22
Results: New Vehicle – Under-hood Thermal Flow Field
Baseline – IRFM Packaging Improved – IRFM Packaging

Hot air recirculation in No hot air recirculation in


front of intercooler front of intercooler

Path Lines coloured by Temperature ( C)


Wednesday, September 26, 2012 2012 Automotive Simulation World Congress 23
Results: New Vehicle – Max Power Condition
Baseline – IRFM Packaging Improved – IRFM Packaging
Intercooler Intercooler
Velocity contours (m/s) Velocity contours (m/s)
Max
Max

Improved ambient air


Velocity = 5.2 m/s
Velocity = 5.2 m/s temperature profile at
Min
Min the intercooler inlet
Temperature contours ( C) face
Temperature contours ( C)
Inlet Face Outlet Face Inlet Face Outlet Face
Charged Air Flow direction Max
Charged Air Flow direction

Max

Min
Min
CFD ∆T = 70.1 C CFD ∆T = 78.5 C
Wednesday, September 26, 2012 24
2012 Automotive Simulation World Congress
Results: New Vehicle – Max Power Condition
Baseline – IRFM Packaging Improved – IRFM Packaging
Intercooler Intercooler
Velocity contours (m/s) Velocity contours (m/s)
Max
Max

Improved ambient air


Velocity = 5.2 m/s
Velocity = 5.2 m/s temperature profile at
Min
Min the intercooler inlet
Temperature contours ( C) face
Temperature contours ( C)
Inlet Face Outlet Face Inlet Face Outlet Face
Charged Air Flow direction Max
Charged Air Flow direction

Max

Min
Min
CFD ∆T = 70.1 C CFD ∆T = 78.5 C
Wednesday, September 26, 2012 25
2012 Automotive Simulation World Congress
Results: New Vehicle – Max Power Condition
Baseline – IRFM Packaging Improved – IRFM Packaging
Radiator Radiator
Velocity contours (m/s) Velocity contours (m/s)
Max
Max

Improved ambient air


temperature profile at Velocity = 7.3 m/s
Velocity =7.3 m/s Min
Min the Radiator inlet face

Temperature contours ( C) Temperature contours ( C)


Inlet Face Outlet Face Inlet Face Outlet Face
Coolant flow direction Coolant flow direction
Max Max

Min
Min
CFD ∆T = 5.9 C CFD ∆T = 6.4 C
Wednesday, September 26, 2012 2012 Automotive Simulation World Congress 26
Results: New Vehicle – Max Power Condition
Baseline – IRFM Packaging Improved – IRFM Packaging
Radiator Radiator
Velocity contours (m/s) Velocity contours (m/s)
Max
Max

Improved ambient air


temperature profile at Velocity = 7.3 m/s
Velocity =7.3 m/s Min
Min the Radiator inlet face

Temperature contours ( C) Temperature contours ( C)


Inlet Face Outlet Face Inlet Face Outlet Face
Coolant flow direction Coolant flow direction
Max Max

Min
Min
CFD ∆T = 5.9 C CFD ∆T = 6.4 C
Wednesday, September 26, 2012 2012 Automotive Simulation World Congress 27
Summery
 Correlation level between Field test and CFD simulation is
more than 80%

 Hot air recirculation has been identified for new vehicle


under-hood compartment using validated CFD process

 Under-hood compartment thermal flow field has been


improved by stooping hot air recirculation by introducing
sealing, thus improved :
 12% Intercooler performance &
 8.5% Radiator performance

Wednesday, September 26, 2012 2012 Automotive Simulation World Congress 28


THANK YOU !!

Contact:
Ashok Patidar
akpatidar@vecv.in
Wednesday, September 26, 2012 2012 Automotive Simulation World Congress 29

You might also like